Providence Canyon State Park - Take a Closer Look at the Evidence

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 янв 2025

Комментарии • 19

  • @b3nnyspain
    @b3nnyspain Год назад +1

    Thank you sir, I only gained knowledge of this canyon 5 or 6 months ago. I learned of it from a secular source and immediately thought this completely blows the door off of evolutionary theory but so far, I haven't found anything that attributes this phenomenon as refutation against evolution, less this great effort.

  • @debbrapayne5340
    @debbrapayne5340 5 лет назад +2

    Such an amazing lesson! So thankful for the evidence! Amazing ministry! ❤️

  • @Seminight7
    @Seminight7 3 года назад +3

    Epic. Good information and awesome footage.

    • @briandobler3437
      @briandobler3437  2 года назад

      Glad you enjoyed it. I appreciate the feedback.

  • @timothykeith1367
    @timothykeith1367 Год назад +2

    The Grand Canyon would be much wider if it were millions of years old. Providence canyon isn't getting deeper, but each year it grows wider and it is less than 200 years old.

  • @gianfrancoarias9634
    @gianfrancoarias9634 5 лет назад +2

    Amazing site to see..will be sharing.

  • @thefoundationakawoeproduct6103
    @thefoundationakawoeproduct6103 2 года назад +2

    Bro! Just seeing this! Wow thank you SO much for your evidence! You need more videos my man!

  • @AllenIsbell
    @AllenIsbell Год назад

    Apples to oranges...
    The Grand Canyon's rocks, mainly limestone and sandstone, are way tougher and erode at a slower pace than the softer materials-like sand, clay, and silt-forming the grounds of Providence Canyon.

    • @briandobler3437
      @briandobler3437  11 месяцев назад +1

      Post Flood erosion would have gouged the majority of the Grand Canyon while still soft.

    • @AllenIsbell
      @AllenIsbell 11 месяцев назад

      @@briandobler3437 There is no scientific evidence supporting the occurrence of Noah's flood. The geological and archaeological record does not provide the necessary empirical support for a global flood. The scientific consensus overwhelmingly favors natural explanations for geological formations, and the lack of credible evidence for a worldwide flood raises significant doubts about its historicity.

    • @briandobler3437
      @briandobler3437  8 месяцев назад

      @@AllenIsbell All evidence is interpreted through presuppositions. Evolutionists and creationists have the same evidence and use the same science but come to completely different conclusions. That's because they have differing starting presuppositions. Here is a good article: creation.com/presuppositions-the-evidence-doesnt-speak-for-itself Thanks for stopping by.

  • @williamhaines7723
    @williamhaines7723 2 года назад

    No Cap!

  • @elrockero30
    @elrockero30 Год назад +1

    If you believe in the word of God, see Mt 16, 18-19 and look for that only church that Jesus found. Only one, you like history, do the research and do a video!!!😊