Jazakum Allahu Khairan. Brilliant! Knowledge is never enough, although not everyone can honestly accept the truth and deal with it. Surely, the Ummah is in a dilemma... Subhaan Allah.
Ayesha siddiqa razi Allah anha is the mother of believers, whose evidence of purity and dignity is given in Qur'an, how can you believe a non believer and not Allah s.w.t
An excellent review and an exhaustive effort, May Allah reward you brother Malik and whoever contributed to the making of this video, MORE OF THE SAME ... PLEASE😅
I've heard it said that, according to the Shia, Aisha wasn't a child-bride, but already a well-developed teenager at the time of her marriage to the Prophet. If so? Why do the Sunnis insist on her having been a child? To imply that an innocent baby-girl couldn't have made up all the things she reported?
@@gudduthakur1249 I heard she was 16 or 18 or 19, I never heard 24 or 26 and I never heard before the divorcee part. Where did you get that information.
This is mind boggling awesome, brilliant presentation of facts. A blatant naked Truth for any intellectual thinker. Anyone who denies this facts is either living in a bubble or his too emotional to face the truth either way one believes it or not.The facts are not going to change, its just unfortunate that Aisha's transgressions gives bad name to Islam and that is the sad part about it.
Salam Alaikum. Thank you for sharing this information. Truth is truth. Facts are facts. You cannot change them. For me truth and God's love are the most important things in the world. I love God dearly in truth and with my whole heart. God bless you.
When Aisha smeared Kadija RA name in front of Muhammad SAWs face I lost all respect for her and the Battle of Jemel just proved she was not the ideal wife
This is iralavant shi go against the sunna ....the desputes between these charicters and thier personalities ...shi are not devout u know this i have seen enough of you ...were is the shi hafiz go find one ...stop being sherp
Is everything that suits our previous notions and teachings would always be easily considered a FACT without assessing others' perspectives? If that so, we would be lost to any misinformation that suits our whims.
None of this should be too surprising. A strong theory about the origin of the conflict with Ali is that she wanted Talha, her supposed lover, to become Khalifa replacing Ali and his sons. It’s stunning that the Quran itself strongly bars any Muslim from marrying any of the prophet’s wives after his passing as if anticipating this very scenario.
@@SH-np9vu don’t worry friend if we brought every book in the world as evidence you will reject because you have a fantasy in your head that you cannot overcome. Read the Quran well and thoughtfully and you will see what I mean.
dear viewers must read the following books Peshawar nites, then i was guided, black Thursday, al murajaet etc to learn the truth and follow the true Islam these books have all your answers or doughts with Sahi hadiths mentioned with references from top books like sahi bhukari etc and come close to allah....all the best. it made my decision to be in true religion.
@@binthaydar Most welcome. Let me know if you're interested in reading hadith/sermons by the Holy Imams (a) regarding various topics. i got way many. See some for instance, (I'll post some regarding tawheed) _(The book) ‘Al Ihtijaj’ - From Hisham Bin Al Hakam who said,_ ‘The atheist asked Abi Abdillah Master Al Saadiq (a), He said, ‘From which thing did Allah Create the things?’ He (a) said: ‘From nothing!’ He said, ‘So how did a thing come from nothing?’ He (a) said: ‘The things are not vacant from either having been created from a thing or from without a thing. If these were created from a thing, it would have been with Him. So that thing would be ancient, and the ancient cannot happen to be an occurrence, nor can it perish, nor change. And that thing cannot be vacant from being one essence, and one colour. So, from where did these difference colours and the many existing essences come to be in this world, from various types? And where did the death come from, if the thing from which the things had been created, was alive? And from where did the life come from if that thing was dead? And it is not allowed that a living and dead both be ancient, nor ceasing to be, because the living is such that dead cannot come from it and He does not cease to be alive, nor is it allowed as well that the dead be ancient, not ceasing to be with what is attributed with the dead, because the dead, there is not power for it, therefore it cannot last’. He said, ‘From where are they saying that the things are eternal?’ He (a) said, ‘These are words of a people who are rejecting management of the things, so they are belying the Messengers and their words, and the Prophets (a) and what they have informed on His behalf and named their books as ‘stories of the former ones’, and they placed a religion for themselves with their own opinions. And their approbation is that the things point upon their occurrences from rotations of the spheres with whatever is in it, and these are seven spheres, and the earth and the ones upon it are moving, and the turning of the times, and interchanging of the time, and the newly occurring events which occur in the world, from the increase and the decrease, and death, and afflictions, and the restlessness of the soul to the calmness, (point) that there is a Maker for it and a manager. Can’t you see the sweet becoming sour, and the sweet (becoming) bitter, and the new (becoming) decayed, and all are to change and perishing? And he (the narrator) continued the Hadeeth until he said, ‘The atheist said, ‘And the one who claims that Allah did not cease to be and with Him was harmful clay. So He could not Separate from it except by mixing it with it and inserting it into it. So, from that clay, He Created the things’ He (a) said, ‘Glory be to Allah! How frustrated is a god who is described as being with the power not being able to separate from the clay! If the clay was alive, eternal, there would be two gods, both ancient. So, they mixed and managed the word from themselves. It that was like that, then from where did the death come, and the annihilation? And if the clay was dead, so there is no lasting for the dead along with the eternal, the ancient, and the dead is such, the living cannot come from it. These are the words of Al-Daysaniya, the staunchest of the atheists in words’. Then he (a) said in a place from this Hadeeth, ‘If it was ancient, eternal, it would not change from a state to a state, and the eternal cannot be changed by the days, nor can the annihilation come upon it’’. *[Bihar Al Anwaar - V 54 The book of creation - Ch 2 H 53]* _(The books) ‘Nahj Al-Balagah’, and ‘Al-Ihtijaj’ - In a sermon of Amir Al-Momineen Ali (a),_ ‘The One (Allah) His ancientness is evidenced upon by the newly occurrence of His creation, and by the newly-occurrence of His creation upon His existence’ - up to his (a) words, ‘The newly occurrence of the things testify upon His eternality.' And in another famous sermon (186) ‘The times do not accompany Him nor do the devices behind Him. His existence precedes the times and the non-existence and the beginning of His eternality.' Up to his (a) words, ‘The stillness and the movement does not flow upon Him. How can it flow upon Him what He has Flowed and Returns in Him what He had Begun, and how can it occur in Him what He is it’s Occurer? Then His Self would be diverse, and His existence would be in parts, and it would not prevent eternity of its meaning’. Up to his (a) words, ‘He Says when He Wants its existence: “Be!” So it comes into being. Not by a voice reverberating nor a call being heard, and rather His Speech, Glorious is He, is a deed from Him He Grew it and Represented it. It did not happen to exist from before that, and had it existed anciently, it would have been a second god. He cannot be said to have existed after having been non-existent, so the descriptions of the newly occurring events would flow upon Him, nor does there happen to be any gap between it and Him, nor would there be any merit for Him upon it, so the Maker and made would be the same, the Initiator and the initiated would be a match. He Created the creature not based upon any prior example from others, and He was not assisted upon their creation by anyone from His creatures, and He Grew the world and Withheld it from without any occupation and Spread it unsettled, and Made it stand without any legs, and Raised it without any pillars, and Fortified it from the bends and the crookedness, Prevented it from the crumbling and splitting. He Spread its pegs and Struck its barriers, and Swept its springs, and Dug out its valleys. It did not weaken Him what He had Built nor did what He had Strengthened, weaken’. Up to his (a) words, ‘He will be the Annihilator of it after its existence, until its existence becomes like lost, and the annihilation of the world after its beginning is not stranger that its growth and its invention’. Up to his (a) words, ‘And surely, He the Glorious, after the annihilation of the world, would return to be Alone, there not being anything with Him. Just as He used to be before its beginning, like that He would be after its annihilation, without there being any time, nor place, nor moment, nor era. The terms and the timings would be non-existence during that, and the years and the hours would cease. So there will be nothing except the One, the Subduer Who, to Him is the destination of entirety of the matters. Without any power from it was the beginning of its creation, and without prevention from it would be its annihilation, and had it any power upon the prevention, its lasting would be permanent. The Making of something had not obstacle for Him when He Made it, and it did not fatigue Him what He had Formed and Created, and He did not Bring it into being in order to strengthen Authority, nor out of fear from a decline and loss, nor to be assisted by it over an overwhelming adversary, nor to be protected by from an avenging opponent, nor to increase in His Kingdom by it, nor to propagate (boast) to an associate in His association, nor for loneliness which was from Him so He Wanted to be comforted to it. Then he shall Annihilate it after bringing it into being, not due to any tedium having come upon Him in its upkeep and its administration, nor for any rest to come to Him, nor for a burden of anything from it upon Him. The length of its lasting does not tire Him so He would leave it to the quickness of its annihilation, but He, the Glorious, Manages it with His subtlety, and Withholds it by His Command, and Makes it precise by His Power. Then He will Repeat it after the annihilation from without there being any need from Him to it, nor will anything from it assist Him upon it, nor to exchange from a state of loneliness to a state of comfort, nor from a state of ignorance and blindness to (state of) knowledge and search, nor from poverty and need to richness and abundance, nor from humiliation and weakness to honour and power.' *[Bihar Al Anwaar - V 54 The book of creation - Ch 2 H 6]*
@@nihatkarazade07If we did you would say we made it up 😂 The reason we use your books to prove our points is because you can use your own book along with logic and reasoning to come to the truth
It’s kinda reassuring (not that i was suspicious) that this book depicts her (idk how to spell her name 🤡) from a completely unbiased perspective since the writer(I’m assuming) not shi-e nor muslim… sooo yeah
@@zahra-fg5ig you are bragging about something which has no authentic evidence i.e. references, chains given. And delete that emoji, ALLAHU ALAM it might also in depicting humans which is a severe sin in ISLAM
Subhannalah Thank you for the wake up I am born a sunni moroccon God bless you for the truth The sunni believe is a gangsterthugfaith build with lies subhannalah
Alhamdolillah im syed and shea Athna Ashri. And all our Imams taught us to respect the house of the Holy Prophet saw and a Prophet's wife can never commit adultery or any other sexual sin. Allah made it impossible so that His Prophet's progeny and generation remain pure
العراقي موجود عندي هذا الاختيار على جهاز اندرويد بس ما تطلع ترجمة ربما هذه الترجمة متوفرة في بعض الأجهزة الحديثة فقط أو تعتمد حسب إعدادات اللغة في الجهاز أو سبب آخر
The only thing they say is tht aisha is wife of mohammed saws and poor those who dare to talk against her or bad about her....such person is a kafir in their eyes like she is a goddess or something....They know NOTHING about aisha other that she is Mohammed saws wife and mother of believer .....and they treat her as she is best woman ever lived .....They don't read or hear facts about aisha......They only repeat what they have heard from others......
The Qur’an, according to the Shiite belief is distorted, and now you are citing it as evidence. This is if there are verses that prove what you are saying about Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) !!
Regardless of the differences between Shia and Sunni narratives and beliefs, what does this say about the prophet of Islam? The most troubling part of this narrative is that one cannot ignore the possibility that the prophet was at least a lousy judge of character to marry this supposedly evil woman and spend the rest of his life with her. Not only that, but to surround himself with not one but a group of close companions who obviously did not believe in him or his message and conspired against him and assassinated him. How gullible, misguided and fallible could he be? How can Mohammed not see through the evil around him if he was truly filled with the light of Allah? How could God not guide him and reveal to him the evils of those closest to him? This narrative forces us to either question the veracity of the narratives of both Sunni and Shia Islam or question the prophet himself.
Allah sets forth an example for the disbelievers: the wife of Noah and the wife of Lot. Each was married to one of Our righteous servants, yet betrayed them.1 So their husbands were of no benefit to them against Allah whatsoever. Both were told, “Enter the Fire, along with the others!”
And Allah sets forth an example for the believers: the wife of Pharaoh, who prayed, “My Lord! Build me a house in Paradise near You, deliver me from Pharaoh and his ˹evil˺ doing, and save me from the wrongdoing people.”
Khaled Amalki. Aisha was married to Jubayr ibn Mutim ibn Adi, and was divorced when her father Abu Bakr ibn Abi Qahafa decided to convert to Islam. She was divorced aged in her twenties and brought to the Prophet as a woman who had suffered due to her father's conversion. [She was not 6 or 9 years old as according to ibn Katheer, for no child was born aged minus 13 years]. To be fair to the Prophet of Islam, he did warn the ummah when he pointed to Aisha's hut as the source of the Devil's horn, but fell short of divorcing her. Her second marriage was not consummated and planned to marry Talha ibn Ubaydullah after the Prophet had died. But her plan was demolished with the Quran prohibiting wives of the Prophet to re-marry. Academics do concede that history of Islam would have been terror-free if she had been divorced and allowed to marry Talha ibn Ubaydullah, and her sexual frustrations would have made her far less promiscuous. She never gave up on Talha, and after inciting the ummah to "Kill Na'thal (Uthman ibn Affan ) for he has become a kaafir", after the latter refused to restore her allowance, and was angry when she learned that Uthman had been killed but the people of Madina had not opted for Talha. She then waged war against Ali bn Abi Talib.
I see where you are coming from but marriage in medieval Arabia, it was a common practise among tribes as a means of cementing bonds. For 1 man to found a religion that went on to become one of the largest in the world (where he actually governed over followers) in a short period was inconceivable. In the early days in particular it was miraculous that the religion survived because it was unsettling to the other established religious communities, the Pagans, Jews & Gnostic Christians. Islam was under threat from the beginning, it was therefore necessary to make firm alliances with tribal stalwarts. Many of the companions coveted the marriage of Fatima and had come forth with proposals but they were rejected, a* suitable consolation was to take their daughters*. In addition, it’s not about a poor judge of character but rather a refusal to intervene in free will. When you take an objective look into the faith, these “mistakes” in history have been necessary to see the truth of what transpired.
الرجل متعب نفسه ٩٠ دقيقة تصوير ومصادر ومونتاج ووو … فقط حتى يطعن؟ سبحان الله يعني إذا أنا قلت عن أبو لؤلؤة رضي الله عنه، هل بهذه الطريقة أثبت أني على حق؟ ما يصير هذا الكلام
Do you think that Aisha's corruption began when she was groomed and then became a child bride? I wouldn't be surprised if she ended up with severe trauma from such abuse.
Yam Jam yes and maybe even some non-Shia Muslims too, although Omar Suleiman questions the objectivity of this opinion at the end of his lecture on Aisha’s age 😒
In the light of Ayat e Tatheer is it possible even that The Prophet ever consummated his marriage with Ayesha LA. Don't think it is possible. Nevertheless it is a question which needs an answer.
I guess I am a sushi muslim 😂 because there are certain things I believe from both sides. I love my sunni and shia brothers for Allah. I just can't be convinced of certain things that would make me 100% sunni or shia. There is lack of historical evidences...
احسنتم كل مقلته صحيح وواضح ولكني لم اكن اعرف ان هذا الكاتب كشف عن كل هذه المعلومات واكثرها مذكورة في كتب السنة وخاصة العنوان الذي ادعته لنفسها وتوصل الى هذه النتائج الصادمة للسنة سؤالي متى بدأت عائشة تحدث وهل يذكر التاريخ تاريخا له لانها لايمكنها فعل ذلك في زمن ابوبكر وعمر وعثمان لانهم منعوا التحدث بأحاديث النبي أما في زمن الامام علي ع فأكيد انها لاتجرئ ان تحدث فهل استخدمها معاوية لتحرف وتسئ الى النبي ص واهل بيته الطيبين الطاهرين وهل سمها معاوية وقتلها بنفس الطريقة التي قتلت بها رسول الله ص ولذلك اوصت بدفنها في البقيع لانها أحدثت بعد رسول الله اي انها أجرمت ومع ان جرائمها كثيرة ولكن سم الرسول ص هي اعظم الجرائم
I just watched this video. While I find this video interesting and informative, there are certain parts of the video that made me squirm and incredibly uncomfortable. I understand that the purpose of the video was to show how a non Muslim man reading Islamic history made his own conclusions about Aishas character, there are some aspects of the book which I really don’t think you should have read and were unnecessary. The sexual references were quite frankly disgusting and even if you want to prove there is evidence of her being promiscuous, reading aloud sexual references from this fictitious novel was unnecessary. As much as I hate Aisha just hearing those did not sit well with me and I do not believe the prophet would approve of this, because she was still his wife anyway. To me poisoning the Prophet (saw), waging the war on Imam Ali , her hatred of sayeda Fatima and the Ahlulbayt should be sufficient for us to hate Aisha as they are the worst crimes to ever be committed. Anything extra is unnecessary and will not convince anything to anyone who already has a liking to her or already dislikes her. This is my honest opinion. I Have watched a few videos from Rafida and have really liked them but this one just didn’t sit too well with me.
@may2001 I agree, some of the content was very explicit and shocking. However, I feel that the aim of this video was actually to shock people severely and in tern stimulate them to go and research these matters for themselves. Of course this can be dangerous and it often worsens sectarian tensions, but I do believe there were cases of people converting from Sunni to Shia Islam after hearing such shocking things and attempting to refute them through historical research but instead finding that they were undeniably true. I converted from Sunni to Twelver Shia Islam in 2015 through independent research sparked by curiosity. However, in my case it was listening to respectful discussions and lectures bye Shia speakers that by the mercy of Allah lead me to convert. I think in most cases, respectful and academic criticism is much better than insults and shaming when putting across our narrative to our fellow Muslims.
Alhamdulillah for your conversion to Shia Islam. That is great you had an open mind to research and go further and find the answers you needed. This video had some great academic discussion about the character of Aisha, although I just felt some content was unnecessary. I certainly don’t think this video will be accepted by people who have been raised to hold Aisha in high esteem their whole life. But I guess if some people felt shocked at the content it may get them to Further investigate InshaAllah.
Interesting that your sensibilities are disturbed. Explicit female sexual details offend you more than murdering the Prophet. Perhaps some of these people are not worthy of respect considering their crimes and obvious abhorrent character and yet here you are squirming and being offended. The Prophet with his 11 wives and going through them in one night like a dose of salts without bathing once and all his sex slaves and slave booty and marrying a 6 yr old doesn’t make you squirm as much as Aisha’s “lewd”behaviour just because she was the wife of your Prophet. They say that a woman behaviour reflects that of her mate. “ The male beast always finds the female beast”The truth is the truth whether it makes your stomach turn or not. If she wasn’t the Prophet’s wife you wouldn’t give two figs. Decency towards woman in Islamis absent they should not be seen or heard so I guess this Aisha person is quite an anathema to you. Women are as evil as men but men are more heinous because they have more power. The Caliphs spread corruption in the land and they were power hungry murdering Imam Hussain as he prayed with such disgusting brutality and the sacking pillaging and the rape of 1000 women in Medina is not worthy of your comment . so what if a female learned much from her master. Unrestrained sexual appetite in Muslim men is abhorrent, unspiriritual and disgusting inspired by the Celestial Pornographic orgies involving 72 Sex dolls promised to men in heaven. Your sexist hypocrisy is obvious to all. Take some Omeprazole and open you bigoted eyes.
Lanet Bar Iblees and Aisha, Beshumarr Lanat. Dont Read that Book it will take you away from the Straight Path. Iblees la. says He is God. Therefore people follow him, because they are blinded. Dont know how to believe and find God Allah. Allah Akbar min Malaikatihi.
I have read this book many times, I don't think what you said is correct about exposing Ayisha. The book is perspective based not exposing Ayisha rather than taking it from what people seen or heard based on the interaction. Most importantly the respect is kept by Imam Ali (AS) toward Ayisha even though there was bad blood between them because of relationship of Ayisha and Prophet(PBUH). either way I highly recommend the book.
Take this down. A salacious novel like this should never be publicised or reported on. It does not give fresh insights. It has no benefit. Analyse hadith by all means but drop this sickening book
Hazrat Aeisha was not Maasoom (infallible). Only the Prophet & Hazrat Fatima Zahra and the 12 imams are infallible. So the problem is not with Hazrat Aeisha but with the Sunni ulama's who insist on portraying her as infallible and so some of the the Shias, without considering her situation and her human weakness, insist on completely downgrading her. Only the infallible Hazrat Fatima Zahra and her glorious father and her magnificent husband and their 11 descendant Imams are the actual models for all muslims to follow.
نحن بحاجة لهكذا أشخاص متمكنين من اللغة الإنكليزية ليحاضروا للغرب عن التشيع العظيم والإسلام الحقيقي ويبينوا جرائم اعداء أل محمد عليهم السلام أحسنت أخ مالك, فلقد تابعتك جيدا اثناء حدوث الضجة المفتعلة من ابناء عائشة على فيلم سيدة الجنة, وكانت ردودل رصينة وحكيمة وبطريقة راقية ومميزة تابع ولك الأجر والثواب عند مولاتنا الزهراء(ع) وثبتك الله على دين محمد وأله الطاهرين وعلى منهاجهم الصحيح المتمثل بمنهاج سماحة الشيخ ياسر الحبيب دام ظله الشريف
May Allah's laanah be on those who lied in this book, eho believed those lies and upon those, who are glad that the prophet's beloved wife, mother of believers is utterly mispresented like this! Most of these who are rejoicing to a kafeer written book are mushrikeen here. I even saw a comment asking madat from Ali radhiyAllahu anhu. May Allah give hidaya to thosr of you, ya mushrikeen, who deserve it.
I mean he did show authentic hadiths in the video which were either hassan or sahih which essentially proves his point. While I still think you should be respectful to Aisha as Imam Ali (AS) was, you can see still see her for what she was. And also asking Imam Ali (AS) for Madat is a form of intercession, he won't necessarily be able to help you directly but he will ask Allah (SWT) to help you. Anyways I hope this cleared up some misunderstanding Inshallah and May Allah bless you 👍
Aisha's Life with Muhammad Aisha's Behavior in Muhammad's Harem Was she a good wife in Muhammad’s harem? Given that she was by far the most rebellious among the wives, the answer is an emphatic 'no'. Islamic sources attest that Aisha remained as an immature child in Muhammad’s harem. Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: that 'Umar entered upon Hafsa and said, "O my daughter! Do not be misled by the manners of her who is proud of her beauty because of the love of Allah's Apostle for her." By 'her' he meant Ayesha. Omar added, "Then I told that to Allah's Apostle and he smiled (on hearing that)". Sahih Bukhari 7:62:145 'Umar, the second Caliph of Islam, testified about the "perfect Mother of Believers's" bad mannerisms in a sahih hadith, warning his daughter to not be misled by her. Islamic sources also tell us that there was much fighting within Muhammad’s harem. The wives were divided into two groups with Aisha in control of one. Narrated 'Urwa from 'Aisha: The wives of Allah's Apostle were in two groups. One group consisted of 'Aisha, Hafsa, Safiyya and Sauda; and the other group consisted of Um Salama and the other wives of Allah's Apostle... Sahih Bukhari 3:47:755 Was Aisha happy with Muhammad’s wife-collecting spree? Again, no, she was not. When made privy of Muhammad intentions of making a further addition to his harem in the form of Zainab bint Jahsh, his paternal cousin[1] and his son-in-law’s wife, Aisha exploded. This frantic outburst even warranting an intervention from Muhammad’s alter-ego, Allah, with holy verses. Narrated Aisha: I used to look down upon those ladies who had given themselves to Allah's Apostle and I used to say, "Can a lady give herself (to a man)?" But when Allah revealed: "You (O Muhammad) can postpone (the turn of) whom you will of them (your wives), and you may receive any of them whom you will; and there is no blame on you if you invite one whose turn you have set aside (temporarily)." (33.51) I said (to the Prophet), "I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires." Sahih Bukhari 6:60:311 The truth is, she was never happy with Muhammad, and their marriage was far from being a match made in heaven. We have Sahih sources which confirm this. In one Bukhari hadith, she recalls how she "disliked to face him." Narrated 'Aisha:....I saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip away for I disliked to face him." Sahih Bukhari 1:9:490 She once went so far as to plot against Muhammad, and by extension, this can be construed as a plot against Islam itself. Narrated Ibn Abbas: I intended to ask 'Umar so I said, "Who were those two ladies who tried to back each other against the Prophet?" I hardly finished my speech when he said, "They were 'Aisha and Hafsa." Sahih Bukhari 6:60:436 So, even during Muhammad's lifetime Aisha was subversive towards Islam and she, along with Hafsa, rose up against him. Once again, Allah, the alter-ego of Muhammad, had to intervene with verses to fix the problem. We find these verses in the Qur'anic chapter At-Tahrim.[2] Aisha's Attitude Towards Muhammad So far we have looked at Islamic sources and how they reflect on Aisha but, if we take a careful look at the ahadith that Aisha narrated, the nature and content of many of them are derogatory towards Islam, and very often she is found mocking and belittling her husband. This is not merely propaganda but a fact which anyone with an impartial outlook can confirm for themselves. Here are just a few examples: Aisha said Muhammad was affected with magic, and black magic is considered to be the devil’s doing, thereby she is in fact proclaiming he was under the influence of the devil. Muhammad had lost all sense of reality and acted quite bizarrely. This has been recorded in many places. In Sahih Bukhari alone, it appears six times.[3][4][5][6][7][8] Muhammad, the final Messenger of Allah, being controlled by the devil. This, from the lips of the Mother of Believers. She also created the impression of a very forgetful and clumsy Muhammad. Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet heard a man (reciting Quran) in the Mosque, and he said, "May Allah bestow His Mercy upon him. No doubt, he made me remember such-and such Verses of such-and-such Sura which I dropped (from my memory)... Sahih Bukhari 3:48:823 She disclosed things which Muhammad had told her in private. Narrated Aswad: Ibn Az-Zubair said to me, "Aisha used to tell you secretly a number of things. What did she tell you about the Ka'ba?" I replied, "She told me that once the Prophet said, 'O 'Aisha! Had not your people been still close to the pre-Islamic period of ignorance (infidelity)! I would have dismantled the Ka'ba and would have made two doors in it; one for entrance and the other for exit." Later on Ibn Az-Zubair did the same. Sahih Bukhari 1:3:128 And she betrayed Muhammad’s private affairs. Narrated 'Urwa from 'Aisha: The wives of Allah's Apostle were in two groups. One group consisted of 'Aisha, Hafsa, Safiyya and Sauda; and the other group consisted of Um Salama and the other wives of Allah's Apostle. The Muslims knew that Allah's Apostle loved 'Aisha, so if any of them had a gift and wished to give to Allah's Apostle, he would delay it, till Allah's Apostle had come to 'Aisha's home and then he would send his gift to Allah's Apostle in her home. The group of Um Salama discussed the matter together and decided that Um Salama should request Allah's Apostle to tell the people to send their gifts to him in whatever wife's house he was. Um Salama told Allah's Apostle of what they had said, but he did not reply. Then they (those wives) asked Um Salama about it. She said, "He did not say anything to me." They asked her to talk to him again. She talked to him again when she met him on her day, but he gave no reply. When they asked her, she replied that he had given no reply. They said to her, "Talk to him till he gives you a reply." When it was her turn, she talked to him again. He then said to her, "Do not hurt me regarding Aisha, as the Divine Inspirations do not come to me on any of the beds except that of Aisha." On that Um Salama said, "I repent to Allah for hurting you." Then the group of Um Salama called Fatima, the daughter of Allah's Apostle and sent her to Allah's Apostle to say to him, "Your wives request to treat them and the daughter of Abu Bakr on equal terms." Then Fatima conveyed the message to him. The Prophet said, "O my daughter! Don't you love whom I love?" She replied in the affirmative and returned and told them of the situation. They requested her to go to him again but she refused. They then sent Zainab bint Jahsh who went to him and used harsh words saying, "Your wives request you to treat them and the daughter of Ibn Abu Quhafa on equal terms." On that she raised her voice and abused 'Aisha to her face so much so that Allah's Apostle looked at 'Aisha to see whether she would retort. 'Aisha started replying to Zainab till she silenced her. The Prophet then looked at 'Aisha and said, "She is really the daughter of Abu Bakr." Sahih Bukhari 3:47:755 Negative Views of Aisha Among the Ummah When all is said and done, it is very hard to believe that Aisha was in fact a true Muslim. There is little wonder that most Shi'ites view her with contempt. They are treating her memory in accordance to her merits in Islam. Yes, it may come as a surprise to many but 1/10th of the world's Muslim population considers Aisha as not being a true Muslim, not in the absolute sense of the word. Due to her (Aisha’s) actions against Imam Ali during the times of the Prophet and after his death (including the famous battle of the Camel), the followers of the ahl al-bayt are not encouraged to keep her name for their children. Al-Islam The Shi'ite cleric, Shaykh Yasser Al-Habib, has also accused Aisha, along with Hafsa, of being responsible for the poisoning and death of Muhammad.[9] Aisha's Hatred of Ali Ali, Muhammad's son-in-law, once suggested for him to divorce Aisha when she had become involved in a scandalous affair with a man named Safwan; and there is evidence in Islam’s authentic sources which affirm that Aisha kept hold of her vengeful hatred towards Ali for the rest of her life. So much so, she could barely bring herself to mention him by name. Narrated 'Aisha: "When the Prophet became seriously ill and his disease became aggravated he asked for permission from his wives to be nursed in my house and he was allowed. He came out with the help of two men and his legs were dragging on the ground. He was between Al-Abbas and another man." 'Ubaid Ullah said, "I told Ibn 'Abbas what 'Aisha had narrated and he said, 'Do you know who was the (second) man whose name 'Aisha did not mention'" I said, 'No.' Ibn 'Abbas said, 'He was 'Ali Ibn Abi Talib.' " Sahih Bukhari 1:11:634 Furthermore, the troubled state-of-mind of this young woman led to the first civil war in Islamic history caused by a woman. She led an army against Ali, the fourth elected Caliph of the Muslims. Her actions ultimately caused the death of twenty thousand Muslims in the war now known in history as the “Battle of the Camel”.
Ali is am imam selected by Allah. Ayat al kursi, "who is it that can intercede." Allah has allow intercession from the prophet and the shia alhul bayt imams. Sunni bukhari sources, the biggest sin you are co.mitting.
GREAT VIDEO. Love it...Thank you for the fantastic truth about Aisha. i knew she was very bad but not that it was that bad. Alhamdulilllah for the truth i got now. You are so right... That is what they say....aisha was Mohammed (pbuh &hf)wife so one should not dare to talk against her. Wahabi /salafis claim that if one criticizes aisha one is a kafir...Was a wahabi who told me... Like she is a goddess or something. They don't read their own books, they have NOOOO real knowledge about aisha, they they just repeat what they have learned from their families and teachers/sheikhs....... No research done..... They ALL say the same about Aisha....And attack shia for hating the wives of Mohammmed pbuh&hf.......LOL....Really. Since when was aisha and hafsa the only wives of mohammed pbuh&hf? They are really brainwashed to think that being wife of a prophet makes them perfect. They even claim that wives are part of ahle al bayt a.s.......
I'm stuck and don't understand, why did Ali let Aisha go free, if she was indeed the one who poisoned prophet and was responsible for so much bloodshed? Ali stood for haqq didn't he? He had power didn't he to bring justice didn't he?
If he did kill her, others would’ve killed him and every other kind of Muslim. So many people (men) liked her so if he tried to kill her he and islam would’ve died. The prophet also told him to remain patient or the worse might happen. There’s a lot going on at that time and killing wasn’t easy and done like it sounds
@@Missionhearts That makes no sense because Imam Ali could have easily killed her after the war with Muawiya. The fact that he won the war shows how much power he had at the time. He actually forgave her after the war for joining.
@@Missionhearts You said that Imam Ali had no power, if he did he wouldnt have been the 4th caliph and he would have been able to end Aisha, implying he couldnt when he was fourth caliph. He clearly could have since he won the war showing his side was more powerful. Just because you read something in a Hadith doesn't make it true. There are a ton of bias/fabricated hadiths.
@@Veiled_Ventures Surah Noor is about Aisha accusing Mariah the Coptic of committing zina when she said Ibrahim (as) wasn't the son of RasoolAllah (sawws). The only person narrating that Aisha was the accused and not the accuser, is Aisha herself. I'm sorry your sunni/bakri/umari scholars lied to you.
@@mohammedal-nedawi6646 maybe, but it would have stayed on Google even if Amazon removed it. I tried in German too. I'm not saying the book doesn't exist, it's just weird no search engine knows about it.
@@toobalkain I just googled “aischa mohammeds leibling frau by kurt freischler” and clicked “repeat the search with the omitted results included” and it showed four websites offering the German edition of the book for sale.
All of this is irrelevant, reading and making conclusions based on the character of a person as described by her enemies is a waste of time. Then go ahead and accept all the Christian Claims about the Holy Prophet Muhummad (saw). Both sunnis and Shias are delirious and arguing over nothing, just for power.
1) Sunni, wun Munafiqeen `Sahaba' ka Mazhab hai jinkar Allah ne Quran ki 18 Surao ki 41 Ayato me LAANTE ki hai1 2) Sunni, Rasoolullah ke Qatilo ka Mazhab hai! 3) Sunni, Hazrat Fatima binte Rasool Alaihis Salaam ke Qatilo ka Mazhab hai! 4) Sunni, wun Chutio ka Mazhab hai jinko Rasoolullah ne 16 Saal ke Hazrat Osama RA ki Fauz me shamil hone ka Hukm dia tha! 5) Sunni, wun 4 Haraamio ka Mazhab hai jinpar Maula Ali Alaihis Salaam Allah ki Laanate karte the. 6) Sunni, wun 2 ka Mazhab hai jinko Hazrat Fatima binte Rasool Alaihis Salaam ne Allah ki Laanate bheji thi 7) Sunni, Munkir-e-Rasool ke Sunnat ka Mazhab hai! 8) Sunni, Munkir-e-Quran ke Sunnat ka Mazhab hai. 9) Sunni, Peshaab aur Khoon se Surah Fatiha ko Bemaar ki Peshaani par likhne ka Mazhab hai! 10) Sunni, Rasoolullah ke Namak-Haraamio ka Mazhab hai! 11) Sunni, Kafiro ka Mazhab hai! 12) Sunni, Rasoolullah ke Gaddaaro ka Mazhab hai! 13) Sunni, Rasoolullah ke Har Gazwa se Farraro ka Mazhab hai 14) Sunni, Choro aur Dacaeto ka Mazhab hai! 15) Sunni, Allah ke Laanatio ka Mazhab hai! 16) Sunni, Munafoqeen Sahabao aur wunki Betio ka Mazhab hai 17) Sunni, Munafiq aur Behen ka Beta Umar bin Sahak binte Khattab ka Mazhab hai 18) Sunni, Haraami aek saath 3 Talaaq ki Haraami Paidawar hai. 19) Sunni, Nikah-Hahala se apne Baap ke bhi Bhai hote hai! 20) Sunni, Maula Ali AS ke Bageeo ka Mazhab hai 21) Sunni, apne Ammi, Behen aur Betio ke Mammo ka Dood 10x Pilwakar, Namehram ko Mehram banaane ka Mazhab hai!
Then you have insulted Rasoolullah and His Ahlul-Bayt of QISA. None of them gave their Bayat to trhe Dacoits! Who did the Bayat of whom in Gadeer, on the command of Rasoolullah? Why is the grave of the legitimate owner of FADAK and legitimate INHERITOR of Rasoolullah and the richest business person Hazrat Khatijah binte Khuwalyd RA a secret? Why was the grave of the legitimate Khalifa Maula Ali AS a secret for about 200 years? These are the proofs that the 33 of Saqeefa were Munafiqeen, Murtad, Dacoits, Murderes, Terrorists and Legitimate Bastards!
in conclusion all this talking are we defining that the Holy Koran to be the word of God or are we talking about the spiritual belife of a group of human beings that brought forth the religion of Islam in according to the spiritual belief of a culture of a group of human beings like myself ? better fix the issue and bring forth the truth Sunni and Shia together as soon as possible otherwise no one would believe you God bless you both and may he guide you towards the truth to bring it forth
The sheep eating the paper under Aisha's pillow was the first ever example of 'the dog ate my homework.'
Nah this got me😭😭😭😭🤣🤣🤣
😭😭
Masterpiece of a video. May Allah bless you.
Jazakum Allahu Khairan. Brilliant! Knowledge is never enough, although not everyone can honestly accept the truth and deal with it. Surely, the Ummah is in a dilemma... Subhaan Allah.
Ayesha siddiqa razi Allah anha is the mother of believers, whose evidence of purity and dignity is given in Qur'an, how can you believe a non believer and not Allah s.w.t
Don't just believe anything without any authentic evidence of those narrations which have no references, chains
I was Sunni but became rightly guided and now I am a Rainham with a capital R
lol
liar
🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑
Don't just believe anything without any authentic evidence of those narrations which have no references, chains
رائع الله يبارك فيك مجهود جبار لم ار شخص ينشر الدين بالانجليزية مثلك.
An excellent review and an exhaustive effort, May Allah reward you brother Malik and whoever contributed to the making of this video, MORE OF THE SAME ... PLEASE😅
I've heard it said that, according to the Shia, Aisha wasn't a child-bride, but already a well-developed teenager at the time of her marriage to the Prophet. If so? Why do the Sunnis insist on her having been a child? To imply that an innocent baby-girl couldn't have made up all the things she reported?
They want to present her as a virgin I’ve heard someone say. While the other wives were previously married when he was married with Aisha in Madina.
Aisha was a divorcee and was about 24 or 26 when she got married to rasool e Pak saaw
@@gudduthakur1249 yes she was already divorced, thank you
@@gudduthakur1249 that absolutely correct 💯, thanks 🙏
@@gudduthakur1249 I heard she was 16 or 18 or 19, I never heard 24 or 26 and I never heard before the divorcee part. Where did you get that information.
Masha'Allah, such great work! 🙏👍
Jazakum Allah khair! 🤲❤️
This is mind boggling awesome, brilliant presentation of facts. A blatant naked Truth for any intellectual thinker. Anyone who denies this facts is either living in a bubble or his too emotional to face the truth either way one believes it or not.The facts are not going to change, its just unfortunate that Aisha's transgressions gives bad name to Islam and that is the sad part about it.
I want to read this book since so long. Please do share it. I’ll be extremely thankful to you🙏
Brilliant analysis
Don't just believe anything without any authentic evidence of those narrations which have no references, chains
Salam Alaikum. Thank you for sharing this information. Truth is truth. Facts are facts. You cannot change them. For me truth and God's love are the most important things in the world. I love God dearly in truth and with my whole heart.
God bless you.
Don't just believe anything without any authentic evidence of those narrations which have no references, chains
Brilliant, in-depth research and amazing insight.
When Aisha smeared Kadija RA name in front of Muhammad SAWs face I lost all respect for her and the Battle of Jemel just proved she was not the ideal wife
Riveting to say the least!!! Thank you for your due diligence!!! Where others flinch you and the blessed, Sheikh Yasser Al-Habib, will dare!!
Don't just believe anything without any authentic evidence of those narrations which have no references, chains
Sunnis can’t deny this fact!
Sunni are too brainwashed and love Dubai 😂
This is iralavant shi go against the sunna ....the desputes between these charicters and thier personalities ...shi are not devout u know this i have seen enough of you ...were is the shi hafiz go find one ...stop being sherp
Is everything that suits our previous notions and teachings would always be easily considered a FACT without assessing others' perspectives? If that so, we would be lost to any misinformation that suits our whims.
@@maxmaxmaxgoon5602 lmao u go find one we have more than you ajeeb jahil
@@maxmaxmaxgoon5602 bro take a english course first then come here and write an essay
Honestly great video but I cracked up at 24:24 "we're off to a great start" 😭😭😭😭
You can be a great narrator, I can hear you on Nation Geography documentaries :-)
None of this should be too surprising. A strong theory about the origin of the conflict with Ali is that she wanted Talha, her supposed lover, to become Khalifa replacing Ali and his sons. It’s stunning that the Quran itself strongly bars any Muslim from marrying any of the prophet’s wives after his passing as if anticipating this very scenario.
This guy is on a mission to tarnish the Rafida by pretending to be one of them and saying the Quran is corrupted. Screenshot captured ✅
Don't just believe anything without any authentic evidence of those narrations which have no references, chains
@@SH-np9vu don’t worry friend if we brought every book in the world as evidence you will reject because you have a fantasy in your head that you cannot overcome. Read the Quran well and thoughtfully and you will see what I mean.
Enlightening ❤🔥💕
Please make another video in this style!
Hopefully we can help by sharing and recommending some good videos to people 💚
If anyone knows where to buy that book from or read its pdf, please reply
I want to read this book since so long. Please do share it. I’ll be extremely thankful to you🙏
Only Ahlebait a.s saved & protected Islam 👍
I’m gonna have to place this book on hold from my local library
YA ALI (AS) MADAD MAY ALLAH AZZWAJAL BLESS YOU IMMENSELY IN THIS LIFE AND IN THERE HEREAFTER MY BROTHER ❤️☪️🤲🏼🕌🕋
dear viewers must read the following books Peshawar nites, then i was guided, black Thursday, al murajaet etc to learn the truth and follow the true Islam these books have all your answers or doughts with Sahi hadiths mentioned with references from top books like sahi bhukari etc and come close to allah....all the best. it made my decision to be in true religion.
They are foolish books that appeal to the illiterate and irrational
@@ZaydDepaor like you exactly foolish n illitrare
Mashallah. May Allah swt increase you in knowledge and may the Ahlulbayt (as) be our intercessors InshAllah ♥️
Salam. I guess you mean intercessors?
@@dominancepreserved8749 yeah lol, thanks
@@binthaydar Most welcome. Let me know if you're interested in reading hadith/sermons by the Holy Imams (a) regarding various topics. i got way many. See some for instance,
(I'll post some regarding tawheed)
_(The book) ‘Al Ihtijaj’ - From Hisham Bin Al Hakam who said,_
‘The atheist asked Abi Abdillah Master Al Saadiq (a), He said,
‘From which thing did Allah Create the things?’
He (a) said: ‘From nothing!’
He said, ‘So how did a thing come from nothing?’
He (a) said: ‘The things are not vacant from either having been created from a thing or from without a thing. If these were created from a thing, it would have been with Him. So that thing would be ancient, and the ancient cannot happen to be an occurrence, nor can it perish, nor change. And that thing cannot be vacant from being one essence, and one colour. So, from where did these difference colours and the many existing essences come to be in this world, from various types?
And where did the death come from, if the thing from which the things had been created, was alive? And from where did the life come from if that thing was dead? And it is not allowed that a living and dead both be ancient, nor ceasing to be, because the living is such that dead cannot come from it and He does not cease to be alive, nor is it allowed as well that the dead be ancient, not ceasing to be with what is attributed with the dead, because the dead, there is not power for it, therefore it cannot last’.
He said, ‘From where are they saying that the things are eternal?’
He (a) said,
‘These are words of a people who are rejecting management of the things, so they are belying the Messengers and their words, and the Prophets (a) and what they have informed on His behalf and named their books as ‘stories of the former ones’, and they placed a religion for themselves with their own opinions.
And their approbation is that the things point upon their occurrences from rotations of the spheres with whatever is in it, and these are seven spheres, and the earth and the ones upon it are moving, and the turning of the times, and interchanging of the time, and the newly occurring events which occur in the world, from the increase and the decrease, and death, and afflictions, and the restlessness of the soul to the calmness, (point) that there is a Maker for it and a manager. Can’t you see the sweet becoming sour, and the sweet (becoming) bitter, and the new (becoming) decayed, and all are to change and perishing?
And he (the narrator) continued the Hadeeth until he said,
‘The atheist said,
‘And the one who claims that Allah did not cease to be and with Him was harmful clay. So He could not Separate from it except by mixing it with it and inserting it into it. So, from that clay, He Created the things’
He (a) said,
‘Glory be to Allah! How frustrated is a god who is described as being with the power not being able to separate from the clay! If the clay was alive, eternal, there would be two gods, both ancient. So, they mixed and managed the word from themselves. It that was like that, then from where did the death come, and the annihilation?
And if the clay was dead, so there is no lasting for the dead along with the eternal, the ancient, and the dead is such, the living cannot come from it. These are the words of Al-Daysaniya, the staunchest of the atheists in words’.
Then he (a) said in a place from this Hadeeth,
‘If it was ancient, eternal, it would not change from a state to a state, and the eternal cannot be changed by the days, nor can the annihilation come upon it’’.
*[Bihar Al Anwaar - V 54 The book of creation - Ch 2 H 53]*
_(The books) ‘Nahj Al-Balagah’, and ‘Al-Ihtijaj’ - In a sermon of Amir Al-Momineen Ali (a),_
‘The One (Allah) His ancientness is evidenced upon by the newly occurrence of His creation, and by the newly-occurrence of His creation upon His existence’ - up to his (a) words,
‘The newly occurrence of the things testify upon His eternality.'
And in another famous sermon (186)
‘The times do not accompany Him nor do the devices behind Him. His existence precedes the times and the non-existence and the beginning of His eternality.'
Up to his (a) words,
‘The stillness and the movement does not flow upon Him. How can it flow upon Him what He has Flowed and Returns in Him what He had Begun, and how can it occur in Him what He is it’s Occurer? Then His Self would be diverse, and His existence would be in parts, and it would not prevent eternity of its meaning’.
Up to his (a) words,
‘He Says when He Wants its existence: “Be!” So it comes into being. Not by a voice reverberating nor a call being heard, and rather His Speech, Glorious is He, is a deed from Him He Grew it and Represented it. It did not happen to exist from before that, and had it existed anciently, it would have been a second god.
He cannot be said to have existed after having been non-existent, so the descriptions of the newly occurring events would flow upon Him, nor does there happen to be any gap between it and Him, nor would there be any merit for Him upon it, so the Maker and made would be the same, the Initiator and the initiated would be a match.
He Created the creature not based upon any prior example from others, and He was not assisted upon their creation by anyone from His creatures, and He Grew the world and Withheld it from without any occupation and Spread it unsettled, and Made it stand without any legs, and Raised it without any pillars, and Fortified it from the bends and the crookedness, Prevented it from the crumbling and splitting.
He Spread its pegs and Struck its barriers, and Swept its springs, and Dug out its valleys. It did not weaken Him what He had Built nor did what He had Strengthened, weaken’.
Up to his (a) words,
‘He will be the Annihilator of it after its existence, until its existence becomes like lost, and the annihilation of the world after its beginning is not stranger that its growth and its invention’.
Up to his (a) words,
‘And surely, He the Glorious, after the annihilation of the world, would return to be Alone, there not being anything with Him. Just as He used to be before its beginning, like that He would be after its annihilation, without there being any time, nor place, nor moment, nor era. The terms and the timings would be non-existence during that, and the years and the hours would cease.
So there will be nothing except the One, the Subduer Who, to Him is the destination of entirety of the matters. Without any power from it was the beginning of its creation, and without prevention from it would be its annihilation, and had it any power upon the prevention, its lasting would be permanent.
The Making of something had not obstacle for Him when He Made it, and it did not fatigue Him what He had Formed and Created, and He did not Bring it into being in order to strengthen Authority, nor out of fear from a decline and loss, nor to be assisted by it over an overwhelming adversary, nor to be protected by from an avenging opponent, nor to increase in His Kingdom by it, nor to propagate (boast) to an associate in His association, nor for loneliness which was from Him so He Wanted to be comforted to it.
Then he shall Annihilate it after bringing it into being, not due to any tedium having come upon Him in its upkeep and its administration, nor for any rest to come to Him, nor for a burden of anything from it upon Him. The length of its lasting does not tire Him so He would leave it to the quickness of its annihilation, but He, the Glorious, Manages it with His subtlety, and Withholds it by His Command, and Makes it precise by His
Power.
Then He will Repeat it after the annihilation from without there being any need from Him to it, nor will anything from it assist Him upon it, nor to exchange from a state of loneliness to a state of comfort, nor from a state of ignorance and blindness to (state of) knowledge and search, nor from poverty and need to richness and abundance, nor from humiliation and weakness to honour and power.'
*[Bihar Al Anwaar - V 54 The book of creation - Ch 2 H 6]*
@@dominancepreserved8749 tysm for this reference. i was actually looking for a similar hadith about an athiest.
@@binthaydar I've got more similar reading material. Let me know if i should send it out here.
Wow. How disturbing. And how much of these stories are covered up. I can’t believe a person can revere a woman like this.
Prove cover ups with your own hadith books.
@@nihatkarazade07If we did you would say we made it up 😂
The reason we use your books to prove our points is because you can use your own book along with logic and reasoning to come to the truth
Don't just believe anything without any authentic evidence of those narrations which have no references, chains
A thorn in the eye of the omaris
MashAllah more videos by Abdul-Malik.
I think these are good videos to share and recommend to people :)
It’s kinda reassuring (not that i was suspicious) that this book depicts her (idk how to spell her name 🤡) from a completely unbiased perspective since the writer(I’m assuming) not shi-e nor muslim… sooo yeah
This has a bit of a lengthy start and the intro is a bit of a click bait but the video really starts at 24:00. Very good video, very well cited.
he kind has to make a lot of disclaimers so sunnis don’t get mad in the comments to be fair🤷🏻♀️
@@zahra-fg5igDon't just believe anything without any authentic evidence of those narrations which have no references, chains
@@zahra-fg5ig you are bragging about something which has no authentic evidence i.e. references, chains given. And delete that emoji, ALLAHU ALAM it might also in depicting humans which is a severe sin in ISLAM
It’s good he’s quoting from sahih Hadiths
Well done brother keep it up
Subhannalah Thank you for the wake up
I am born a sunni moroccon
God bless you for the truth
The sunni believe is a gangsterthugfaith build with lies subhannalah
Thanks for the sahih references! No reasonsable man can deny the facts you laid out.
Where he gave references which have been claimed in that book?
Where can i find the pdf version ?
I want to read this book since so long. Please do share it. I’ll be extremely thankful to you🙏
Fantastic from the other side Shia side. Video excellent editing
Alhamdolillah im syed and shea Athna Ashri. And all our Imams taught us to respect the house of the Holy Prophet saw and a Prophet's wife can never commit adultery or any other sexual sin. Allah made it impossible so that His Prophet's progeny and generation remain pure
Aisha never carried the children off the prophet pbuh for this reason
@rafidaplus
Brother please reupload these video's again. JazakAllah Khair.
LABBAIK YA HUSSAIN ALAYHIS SALAAM 😢
Well Sunni do say she was very jealous of the other wives 💁🏻♀️
If so, she should never create chaos if she was a pious woman
Only Shia Religion is true 👍
نطلب من الاخوة الكرام ترجمة هذه الحلقات
بأمكانك استخدام ترجمة يوتيوب اعلى الشاشة على جهة اليسار ايقونة ضبط ادخل عليها واختار ترجمة الى العربية
بأمكانك استخدام هذه الخاصية مع اي فديو يوتيوب
العراقي موجود عندي هذا الاختيار على جهاز اندرويد بس ما تطلع ترجمة
ربما هذه الترجمة متوفرة في بعض الأجهزة الحديثة فقط
أو تعتمد حسب إعدادات اللغة في الجهاز
أو سبب آخر
@Fatima Maykh تمت إضافة ترجمة عربية لهذه الحلقة وبعض الحلقات الأخرى
salafis will still deny this even if truth is looking at them may Allah swt guide them to true Islam lanat on the enemies of ahlebait
The only thing they say is tht aisha is wife of mohammed saws and poor those who dare to talk against her or bad about her....such person is a kafir in their eyes like she is a goddess or something....They know NOTHING about aisha other that she is Mohammed saws wife and mother of believer .....and they treat her as she is best woman ever lived .....They don't read or hear facts about aisha......They only repeat what they have heard from others......
Where is the Hadith reference from imam Al Sadie ( Peace be upon him ) regarding the (“3 Maine people “) I want to reference this
Even quran proves our point
The Qur’an, according to the Shiite belief is distorted, and now you are citing it as evidence. This is if there are verses that prove what you are saying about Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) !!
What a cool podcast
Maybe the person in your profile picture will try to imitate brother Abdul Malik too like he tried to imitate Sheikh al-Habib
@@mohammedal-nedawi6646 scared of emir al quraishi? 🤣🤣🤣HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Hasan Ali you really want to spread this pollution everywhere, don’t you?
يبقى الاسلام عظيم
نحمد الله على نعمة التشيع
Dear wake up moses was never acused of been drunk
Regardless of the differences between Shia and Sunni narratives and beliefs, what does this say about the prophet of Islam? The most troubling part of this narrative is that one cannot ignore the possibility that the prophet was at least a lousy judge of character to marry this supposedly evil woman and spend the rest of his life with her. Not only that, but to surround himself with not one but a group of close companions who obviously did not believe in him or his message and conspired against him and assassinated him. How gullible, misguided and fallible could he be? How can Mohammed not see through the evil around him if he was truly filled with the light of Allah? How could God not guide him and reveal to him the evils of those closest to him? This narrative forces us to either question the veracity of the narratives of both Sunni and Shia Islam or question the prophet himself.
Allah sets forth an example for the disbelievers: the wife of Noah and the wife of Lot. Each was married to one of Our righteous servants, yet betrayed them.1 So their husbands were of no benefit to them against Allah whatsoever. Both were told, “Enter the Fire, along with the others!”
And Allah sets forth an example for the believers: the wife of Pharaoh, who prayed, “My Lord! Build me a house in Paradise near You, deliver me from Pharaoh and his ˹evil˺ doing, and save me from the wrongdoing people.”
Khaled Amalki. Aisha was married to Jubayr ibn Mutim ibn Adi, and was divorced when her father Abu Bakr ibn Abi Qahafa decided to convert to Islam. She was divorced aged in her twenties and brought to the Prophet as a woman who had suffered due to her father's conversion. [She was not 6 or 9 years old as according to ibn Katheer, for no child was born aged minus 13 years].
To be fair to the Prophet of Islam, he did warn the ummah when he pointed to Aisha's hut as the source of the Devil's horn, but fell short of divorcing her. Her second marriage was not consummated and planned to marry Talha ibn Ubaydullah after the Prophet had died. But her plan was demolished with the Quran prohibiting wives of the Prophet to re-marry.
Academics do concede that history of Islam would have been terror-free if she had been divorced and allowed to marry Talha ibn Ubaydullah, and her sexual frustrations would have made her far less promiscuous. She never gave up on Talha, and after inciting the ummah to "Kill Na'thal (Uthman ibn Affan ) for he has become a kaafir", after the latter refused to restore her allowance, and was angry when she learned that Uthman had been killed but the people of Madina had not opted for Talha. She then waged war against Ali bn Abi Talib.
I see where you are coming from but marriage in medieval Arabia, it was a common practise among tribes as a means of cementing bonds. For 1 man to found a religion that went on to become one of the largest in the world (where he actually governed over followers) in a short period was inconceivable. In the early days in particular it was miraculous that the religion survived because it was unsettling to the other established religious communities, the Pagans, Jews & Gnostic Christians. Islam was under threat from the beginning, it was therefore necessary to make firm alliances with tribal stalwarts. Many of the companions coveted the marriage of Fatima and had come forth with proposals but they were rejected, a* suitable consolation was to take their daughters*. In addition, it’s not about a poor judge of character but rather a refusal to intervene in free will. When you take an objective look into the faith, these “mistakes” in history have been necessary to see the truth of what transpired.
This is a test from Allah swt to see where the umma will stand with truth or falsehood
Where can I buy that book?
Yeah I need the link
@@EpicRevelations i dont have it .. i was asking where to buy😀
@@ekremgj he was jus sayin that he agrees and wants to know where he/she can also buy the book
I want to buy this book and have been looking for the book called The other face of Aiasha by Sheikh Habib Yasser
@@lailakurji1350 You can call or message fadak tv on WhatsApp
They will send you the book as pdf insha'Allah
Can someone please tell me where I can find this book and buy it/ download it
Available on Amazon
اللهم صل على محمد وآل محمد وعجل فرجهم والعن أعدائهم أجمعين
The Lady of Heaven♥️La Dame du paradis
48:36 to 48:44. You 'Sunni' folks! Wake up!
Asalam Alikum my brother i am from Trinidad i would like to know where can i get this book please sister k.
Don't just believe anything without any authentic evidence of those narrations which have no references, chains
حسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل في كل من يطعن في امنا ام المومنين عائشة رضي الله عنها و صحابة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم
الرجل متعب نفسه ٩٠ دقيقة تصوير ومصادر ومونتاج ووو … فقط حتى يطعن؟ سبحان الله
يعني إذا أنا قلت عن أبو لؤلؤة رضي الله عنه، هل بهذه الطريقة أثبت أني على حق؟ ما يصير هذا الكلام
Do you think that Aisha's corruption began when she was groomed and then became a child bride? I wouldn't be surprised if she ended up with severe trauma from such abuse.
She married the Prophet at the age of 19.
@@RafidaPlus is that what Shia's believe?
Yam Jam yes and maybe even some non-Shia Muslims too, although Omar Suleiman questions the objectivity of this opinion at the end of his lecture on Aisha’s age 😒
Shias believe Aisha lied about her marriage age, this because she tried to defame the Prophet every chance she got.
In the light of Ayat e Tatheer is it possible even that The Prophet ever consummated his marriage with Ayesha LA. Don't think it is possible. Nevertheless it is a question which needs an answer.
They can't deny it no chance, the truth is out,
How can I get this book
I guess I am a sushi muslim 😂 because there are certain things I believe from both sides. I love my sunni and shia brothers for Allah. I just can't be convinced of certain things that would make me 100% sunni or shia. There is lack of historical evidences...
where can I find this pdf? thanks (if there is any)
Rasool SAW she was swahib e yousuf. "The women at yusuf AS palace who were even worse than shaitan himself.
احسنتم كل مقلته صحيح وواضح ولكني لم اكن اعرف ان هذا الكاتب كشف عن كل هذه المعلومات واكثرها مذكورة في كتب السنة وخاصة العنوان الذي ادعته لنفسها وتوصل الى هذه النتائج الصادمة للسنة
سؤالي متى بدأت عائشة تحدث وهل يذكر التاريخ تاريخا له لانها لايمكنها فعل ذلك في زمن ابوبكر وعمر وعثمان لانهم منعوا التحدث بأحاديث النبي أما في زمن الامام علي ع فأكيد انها لاتجرئ ان تحدث فهل استخدمها معاوية لتحرف وتسئ الى النبي ص واهل بيته الطيبين الطاهرين وهل سمها معاوية وقتلها بنفس الطريقة التي قتلت بها رسول الله ص ولذلك اوصت بدفنها في البقيع لانها أحدثت بعد رسول الله اي انها أجرمت ومع ان جرائمها كثيرة ولكن سم الرسول ص هي اعظم الجرائم
I just watched this video. While I find this video interesting and informative, there are certain parts of the video that made me squirm and incredibly uncomfortable. I understand that the purpose of the video was to show how a non Muslim man reading Islamic history made his own conclusions about Aishas character, there are some aspects of the book which I really don’t think you should have read and were unnecessary.
The sexual references were quite frankly disgusting and even if you want to prove there is evidence of her being promiscuous, reading aloud sexual references from this fictitious novel was unnecessary. As much as I hate Aisha just hearing those did not sit well with me and I do not believe the prophet would approve of this, because she was still his wife anyway.
To me poisoning the Prophet (saw), waging the war on Imam Ali , her hatred of sayeda Fatima and the Ahlulbayt should be sufficient for us to hate Aisha as they are the worst crimes to ever be committed. Anything extra is unnecessary and will not convince anything to anyone who already has a liking to her or already dislikes her.
This is my honest opinion. I Have watched a few videos from Rafida and have really liked them but this one just didn’t sit too well with me.
@may2001 I agree, some of the content was very explicit and shocking. However, I feel that the aim of this video was actually to shock people severely and in tern stimulate them to go and research these matters for themselves. Of course this can be dangerous and it often worsens sectarian tensions, but I do believe there were cases of people converting from Sunni to Shia Islam after hearing such shocking things and attempting to refute them through historical research but instead finding that they were undeniably true. I converted from Sunni to Twelver Shia Islam in 2015 through independent research sparked by curiosity. However, in my case it was listening to respectful discussions and lectures bye Shia speakers that by the mercy of Allah lead me to convert. I think in most cases, respectful and academic criticism is much better than insults and shaming when putting across our narrative to our fellow Muslims.
Alhamdulillah for your conversion to Shia Islam. That is great you had an open mind to research and go further and find the answers you needed. This video had some great academic discussion about the character of Aisha, although I just felt some content was unnecessary. I certainly don’t think this video will be accepted by people who have been raised to hold Aisha in high esteem their whole life. But I guess if some people felt shocked at the content it may get them to
Further investigate InshaAllah.
Interesting that your sensibilities are disturbed. Explicit female sexual details offend you more than murdering the Prophet.
Perhaps some of these people are not worthy of respect considering their crimes and obvious abhorrent character and yet here you are squirming and being offended. The Prophet with his 11 wives and going through them in one night like a dose of salts without bathing once and all his sex slaves and slave booty and marrying a 6 yr old doesn’t make you squirm as much as Aisha’s “lewd”behaviour just because she was the wife of your Prophet. They say that a woman behaviour reflects that of her mate. “ The male beast always finds the female beast”The truth is the truth whether it makes your stomach turn or not. If she wasn’t the Prophet’s wife you wouldn’t give two figs. Decency towards woman in Islamis absent they should not be seen or heard so I guess this Aisha person is quite an anathema to you. Women are as evil as men but men are more heinous because they have more power. The Caliphs spread corruption in the land and they were power hungry murdering Imam Hussain as he prayed with such disgusting brutality and the sacking pillaging and the rape of 1000 women in Medina is not worthy of your comment . so what if a female learned much from her master. Unrestrained sexual appetite in Muslim men is abhorrent, unspiriritual and disgusting inspired by the Celestial Pornographic orgies involving 72 Sex dolls promised to men in heaven. Your sexist hypocrisy is obvious to all.
Take some Omeprazole and open you bigoted eyes.
Food for food vessel for vessel sounds like a threat.
Lanet Bar Iblees and Aisha, Beshumarr Lanat. Dont Read that Book it will take you away from the Straight Path. Iblees la. says He is God. Therefore people follow him, because they are blinded. Dont know how to believe and find God Allah. Allah Akbar min Malaikatihi.
I have read this book many times, I don't think what you said is correct about exposing Ayisha. The book is perspective based not exposing Ayisha rather than taking it from what people seen or heard based on the interaction. Most importantly the respect is kept by Imam Ali (AS) toward Ayisha even though there was bad blood between them because of relationship of Ayisha and Prophet(PBUH). either way I highly recommend the book.
Ayesha = Fahisha
ALLAH's blessings!
your german sounds great masallah
Link to this book, please. Thanks, or better scan it and upload it.
Where to read this Book from?
Take this down. A salacious novel like this should never be publicised or reported on. It does not give fresh insights. It has no benefit. Analyse hadith by all means but drop this sickening book
Only one book for you then. Burn all books you don’t like. The illiterate 6th century Arabia is the only world for you. I hope you are there.
Hazrat Aeisha was not Maasoom (infallible). Only the Prophet & Hazrat Fatima Zahra and the 12 imams are infallible. So the problem is not with Hazrat Aeisha but with the Sunni ulama's who insist on portraying her as infallible and so some of the the Shias, without considering her situation and her human weakness, insist on completely downgrading her. Only the infallible Hazrat Fatima Zahra and her glorious father and her magnificent husband and their 11 descendant Imams are the actual models for all muslims to follow.
I am sad that our prophet had to put up with such a venomous woman
Link to purchase book? Jazakallah Khairoon
What up, it’s John Agha from discord
@@johnahmad2116 Azizam
نحن بحاجة لهكذا أشخاص متمكنين من اللغة الإنكليزية ليحاضروا للغرب عن التشيع العظيم والإسلام الحقيقي ويبينوا جرائم اعداء أل محمد عليهم السلام
أحسنت أخ مالك, فلقد تابعتك جيدا اثناء حدوث الضجة المفتعلة من ابناء عائشة على فيلم سيدة الجنة, وكانت ردودل رصينة وحكيمة وبطريقة راقية ومميزة
تابع ولك الأجر والثواب عند مولاتنا الزهراء(ع)
وثبتك الله على دين محمد وأله الطاهرين وعلى منهاجهم الصحيح المتمثل بمنهاج سماحة الشيخ ياسر الحبيب دام ظله الشريف
كذبت, الدين الشيعي ليس الإسلام ولا يمتله بأي صلة..ثاني شيء ياسر الخبيث متى صار شيخ؟!!!
How you made these claims without any clue, that author hadn't mentioned the narrator, references
Can’t find this book anywhere they really was trying to get rid of any traces of this book. Interesting 🤔
You are a genius
May Allah guide everyone 👍
لَعٌنِ أّلَلَهّ عٌمًر ⏳🦉⛓️//أّتٌـبًرعٌ أّلَأّنِ يِّأّرأّفُـضًـيِّ لَعٌرض أّلَفُـلَمً بًکْنِدٍأّ وٌأّسِـتٌـرأّلَيِّأّ بًأّلَلَغُةّ أّلَأّنِکْلَيِّـﺰيِّةّ وٌأّلَفُرنِسِـيِّةّ لَأّوٌلَ مًرةّ🧿
Mashallah
May Allah's laanah be on those who lied in this book, eho believed those lies and upon those, who are glad that the prophet's beloved wife, mother of believers is utterly mispresented like this! Most of these who are rejoicing to a kafeer written book are mushrikeen here. I even saw a comment asking madat from Ali radhiyAllahu anhu. May Allah give hidaya to thosr of you, ya mushrikeen, who deserve it.
Prove to me this is a lie. All you did was call us mishrikeen but that is because your books of oppression are being exposed among communities.
I mean he did show authentic hadiths in the video which were either hassan or sahih which essentially proves his point. While I still think you should be respectful to Aisha as Imam Ali (AS) was, you can see still see her for what she was. And also asking Imam Ali (AS) for Madat is a form of intercession, he won't necessarily be able to help you directly but he will ask Allah (SWT) to help you. Anyways I hope this cleared up some misunderstanding Inshallah and May Allah bless you 👍
Aisha's Life with Muhammad
Aisha's Behavior in Muhammad's Harem
Was she a good wife in Muhammad’s harem? Given that she was by far the most rebellious among the wives, the answer is an emphatic 'no'. Islamic sources attest that Aisha remained as an immature child in Muhammad’s harem.
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: that 'Umar entered upon Hafsa and said, "O my daughter! Do not be misled by the manners of her who is proud of her beauty because of the love of Allah's Apostle for her." By 'her' he meant Ayesha. Omar added, "Then I told that to Allah's Apostle and he smiled (on hearing that)".
Sahih Bukhari 7:62:145
'Umar, the second Caliph of Islam, testified about the "perfect Mother of Believers's" bad mannerisms in a sahih hadith, warning his daughter to not be misled by her.
Islamic sources also tell us that there was much fighting within Muhammad’s harem. The wives were divided into two groups with Aisha in control of one.
Narrated 'Urwa from 'Aisha: The wives of Allah's Apostle were in two groups. One group consisted of 'Aisha, Hafsa, Safiyya and Sauda; and the other group consisted of Um Salama and the other wives of Allah's Apostle...
Sahih Bukhari 3:47:755
Was Aisha happy with Muhammad’s wife-collecting spree? Again, no, she was not. When made privy of Muhammad intentions of making a further addition to his harem in the form of Zainab bint Jahsh, his paternal cousin[1] and his son-in-law’s wife, Aisha exploded. This frantic outburst even warranting an intervention from Muhammad’s alter-ego, Allah, with holy verses.
Narrated Aisha: I used to look down upon those ladies who had given themselves to Allah's Apostle and I used to say, "Can a lady give herself (to a man)?" But when Allah revealed: "You (O Muhammad) can postpone (the turn of) whom you will of them (your wives), and you may receive any of them whom you will; and there is no blame on you if you invite one whose turn you have set aside (temporarily)." (33.51) I said (to the Prophet), "I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires."
Sahih Bukhari 6:60:311
The truth is, she was never happy with Muhammad, and their marriage was far from being a match made in heaven. We have Sahih sources which confirm this. In one Bukhari hadith, she recalls how she "disliked to face him."
Narrated 'Aisha:....I saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip away for I disliked to face him."
Sahih Bukhari 1:9:490
She once went so far as to plot against Muhammad, and by extension, this can be construed as a plot against Islam itself.
Narrated Ibn Abbas: I intended to ask 'Umar so I said, "Who were those two ladies who tried to back each other against the Prophet?" I hardly finished my speech when he said, "They were 'Aisha and Hafsa."
Sahih Bukhari 6:60:436
So, even during Muhammad's lifetime Aisha was subversive towards Islam and she, along with Hafsa, rose up against him. Once again, Allah, the alter-ego of Muhammad, had to intervene with verses to fix the problem. We find these verses in the Qur'anic chapter At-Tahrim.[2]
Aisha's Attitude Towards Muhammad
So far we have looked at Islamic sources and how they reflect on Aisha but, if we take a careful look at the ahadith that Aisha narrated, the nature and content of many of them are derogatory towards Islam, and very often she is found mocking and belittling her husband. This is not merely propaganda but a fact which anyone with an impartial outlook can confirm for themselves.
Here are just a few examples:
Aisha said Muhammad was affected with magic, and black magic is considered to be the devil’s doing, thereby she is in fact proclaiming he was under the influence of the devil. Muhammad had lost all sense of reality and acted quite bizarrely. This has been recorded in many places. In Sahih Bukhari alone, it appears six times.[3][4][5][6][7][8] Muhammad, the final Messenger of Allah, being controlled by the devil. This, from the lips of the Mother of Believers.
She also created the impression of a very forgetful and clumsy Muhammad.
Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet heard a man (reciting Quran) in the Mosque, and he said, "May Allah bestow His Mercy upon him. No doubt, he made me remember such-and such Verses of such-and-such Sura which I dropped (from my memory)...
Sahih Bukhari 3:48:823
She disclosed things which Muhammad had told her in private.
Narrated Aswad: Ibn Az-Zubair said to me, "Aisha used to tell you secretly a number of things. What did she tell you about the Ka'ba?" I replied, "She told me that once the Prophet said, 'O 'Aisha! Had not your people been still close to the pre-Islamic period of ignorance (infidelity)! I would have dismantled the Ka'ba and would have made two doors in it; one for entrance and the other for exit." Later on Ibn Az-Zubair did the same.
Sahih Bukhari 1:3:128
And she betrayed Muhammad’s private affairs.
Narrated 'Urwa from 'Aisha: The wives of Allah's Apostle were in two groups. One group consisted of 'Aisha, Hafsa, Safiyya and Sauda; and the other group consisted of Um Salama and the other wives of Allah's Apostle. The Muslims knew that Allah's Apostle loved 'Aisha, so if any of them had a gift and wished to give to Allah's Apostle, he would delay it, till Allah's Apostle had come to 'Aisha's home and then he would send his gift to Allah's Apostle in her home. The group of Um Salama discussed the matter together and decided that Um Salama should request Allah's Apostle to tell the people to send their gifts to him in whatever wife's house he was. Um Salama told Allah's Apostle of what they had said, but he did not reply. Then they (those wives) asked Um Salama about it. She said, "He did not say anything to me." They asked her to talk to him again. She talked to him again when she met him on her day, but he gave no reply. When they asked her, she replied that he had given no reply. They said to her, "Talk to him till he gives you a reply." When it was her turn, she talked to him again. He then said to her, "Do not hurt me regarding Aisha, as the Divine Inspirations do not come to me on any of the beds except that of Aisha." On that Um Salama said, "I repent to Allah for hurting you." Then the group of Um Salama called Fatima, the daughter of Allah's Apostle and sent her to Allah's Apostle to say to him, "Your wives request to treat them and the daughter of Abu Bakr on equal terms." Then Fatima conveyed the message to him. The Prophet said, "O my daughter! Don't you love whom I love?" She replied in the affirmative and returned and told them of the situation. They requested her to go to him again but she refused. They then sent Zainab bint Jahsh who went to him and used harsh words saying, "Your wives request you to treat them and the daughter of Ibn Abu Quhafa on equal terms." On that she raised her voice and abused 'Aisha to her face so much so that Allah's Apostle looked at 'Aisha to see whether she would retort. 'Aisha started replying to Zainab till she silenced her. The Prophet then looked at 'Aisha and said, "She is really the daughter of Abu Bakr."
Sahih Bukhari 3:47:755
Negative Views of Aisha Among the Ummah
When all is said and done, it is very hard to believe that Aisha was in fact a true Muslim. There is little wonder that most Shi'ites view her with contempt. They are treating her memory in accordance to her merits in Islam.
Yes, it may come as a surprise to many but 1/10th of the world's Muslim population considers Aisha as not being a true Muslim, not in the absolute sense of the word.
Due to her (Aisha’s) actions against Imam Ali during the times of the Prophet and after his death (including the famous battle of the Camel), the followers of the ahl al-bayt are not encouraged to keep her name for their children.
Al-Islam
The Shi'ite cleric, Shaykh Yasser Al-Habib, has also accused Aisha, along with Hafsa, of being responsible for the poisoning and death of Muhammad.[9]
Aisha's Hatred of Ali
Ali, Muhammad's son-in-law, once suggested for him to divorce Aisha when she had become involved in a scandalous affair with a man named Safwan; and there is evidence in Islam’s authentic sources which affirm that Aisha kept hold of her vengeful hatred towards Ali for the rest of her life. So much so, she could barely bring herself to mention him by name.
Narrated 'Aisha: "When the Prophet became seriously ill and his disease became aggravated he asked for permission from his wives to be nursed in my house and he was allowed. He came out with the help of two men and his legs were dragging on the ground. He was between Al-Abbas and another man." 'Ubaid Ullah said, "I told Ibn 'Abbas what 'Aisha had narrated and he said, 'Do you know who was the (second) man whose name 'Aisha did not mention'" I said, 'No.' Ibn 'Abbas said, 'He was 'Ali Ibn Abi Talib.' "
Sahih Bukhari 1:11:634
Furthermore, the troubled state-of-mind of this young woman led to the first civil war in Islamic history caused by a woman. She led an army against Ali, the fourth elected Caliph of the Muslims. Her actions ultimately caused the death of twenty thousand Muslims in the war now known in history as the “Battle of the Camel”.
@@FollowerOfAhluBayt 👍
Ali is am imam selected by Allah. Ayat al kursi, "who is it that can intercede." Allah has allow intercession from the prophet and the shia alhul bayt imams. Sunni bukhari sources, the biggest sin you are co.mitting.
GREAT VIDEO. Love it...Thank you for the fantastic truth about Aisha. i knew she was very bad but not that it was that bad. Alhamdulilllah for the truth i got now. You are so right... That is what they say....aisha was Mohammed (pbuh &hf)wife so one should not dare to talk against her. Wahabi /salafis claim that if one criticizes aisha one is a kafir...Was a wahabi who told me... Like she is a goddess or something. They don't read their own books, they have NOOOO real knowledge about aisha, they they just repeat what they have learned from their families and teachers/sheikhs....... No research done.....
They ALL say the same about Aisha....And attack shia for hating the wives of Mohammmed pbuh&hf.......LOL....Really. Since when was aisha and hafsa the only wives of mohammed pbuh&hf? They are really brainwashed to think that being wife of a prophet makes them perfect. They even claim that wives are part of ahle al bayt a.s.......
Disturbing watch….. any reference for clarification of Surah 24 verses 11-23?
Why would Prophet SAW married her, if this is the case????
you can watch sayed ammar explanation on why the prophet pbuh married her
So the wives of Prophet Lut a.s. and Nuh a.s. weren’t cursed by Allah?
Its Prove that Satan misguide all his favourits in same way
I'm stuck and don't understand, why did Ali let Aisha go free, if she was indeed the one who poisoned prophet and was responsible for so much bloodshed? Ali stood for haqq didn't he? He had power didn't he to bring justice didn't he?
If he did kill her, others would’ve killed him and every other kind of Muslim. So many people (men) liked her so if he tried to kill her he and islam would’ve died. The prophet also told him to remain patient or the worse might happen. There’s a lot going on at that time and killing wasn’t easy and done like it sounds
And he didn’t have any power, if he had he wouldn’t be 4th in caliphate and would’ve been able to end her.
@@Missionhearts That makes no sense because Imam Ali could have easily killed her after the war with Muawiya. The fact that he won the war shows how much power he had at the time. He actually forgave her after the war for joining.
@@SELFMOTIVATION007 so killing is always the best solution? What I said came from a Hadith a brother gave me almost two years ago
@@Missionhearts You said that Imam Ali had no power, if he did he wouldnt have been the 4th caliph and he would have been able to end Aisha, implying he couldnt when he was fourth caliph. He clearly could have since he won the war showing his side was more powerful.
Just because you read something in a Hadith doesn't make it true. There are a ton of bias/fabricated hadiths.
أّلَلَهّـمً أّلَعٌن عٌمًر وٌعٌأّئشُـةّ وٌأّبًوٌبًکْر لَعٌنِأّ کْثًـيِّرأّ دٍأّئبًأّ دٍأّئمًأّ أّبًدٍأً سِـرمًدٍأّ لَأّأّنِقُطِأّعٌ لَأّمًدٍةّ وٌلَأّنِفُـأّذِ لَعٌدٍدٍةّ🤲🏻🤲🏻//
Sir can I get pdf
What about Surah An Noor? What is your response to Allah Subhanahu wa taa'la
What about that surah? Specify it. Make it clear, what your question?
@@nejateshetu7826 ayah 11 onwards, what is the context of the revelation of these verses according to the general Islamic understanding?
@@Veiled_Ventures Surah Noor is about Aisha accusing Mariah the Coptic of committing zina when she said Ibrahim (as) wasn't the son of RasoolAllah (sawws). The only person narrating that Aisha was the accused and not the accuser, is Aisha herself. I'm sorry your sunni/bakri/umari scholars lied to you.
@@red.anon.313 what is the tafseer you are quoting?
@@Veiled_Ventures Tafseer from AhlulBayt (as). Not hypocrite companions.
can't find this book anywhere, looks like google can't either
I remember there was a copy of the book for sale on Amazon, might be sold by now.
@@mohammedal-nedawi6646 there isn't, unless you got the author and the title wrong Google doesn't even find this book.
@@toobalkain That was like 6 months ago or more and if it is sold then the page was probably removed.
Ps: The title was in German.
@@mohammedal-nedawi6646 maybe, but it would have stayed on Google even if Amazon removed it. I tried in German too. I'm not saying the book doesn't exist, it's just weird no search engine knows about it.
@@toobalkain I just googled “aischa mohammeds leibling frau by kurt freischler” and clicked “repeat the search with the omitted results included” and it showed four websites offering the German edition of the book for sale.
All of this is irrelevant, reading and making conclusions based on the character of a person as described by her enemies is a waste of time. Then go ahead and accept all the Christian Claims about the Holy Prophet Muhummad (saw). Both sunnis and Shias are delirious and arguing over nothing, just for power.
Rafida in Sunni world is a derogatory term.
It is a title of honor bestowed by Allah in Shia Islam.
@@mohammedal-nidawi8896omg ikr...? I feel proud for being called that
1) Sunni, wun Munafiqeen `Sahaba' ka Mazhab hai jinkar Allah ne Quran ki 18 Surao ki 41 Ayato me LAANTE ki hai1
2) Sunni, Rasoolullah ke Qatilo ka Mazhab hai!
3) Sunni, Hazrat Fatima binte Rasool Alaihis Salaam ke Qatilo ka Mazhab hai!
4) Sunni, wun Chutio ka Mazhab hai jinko Rasoolullah ne 16 Saal ke Hazrat Osama RA ki Fauz me shamil hone ka Hukm dia tha!
5) Sunni, wun 4 Haraamio ka Mazhab hai jinpar Maula Ali Alaihis Salaam Allah ki Laanate karte the.
6) Sunni, wun 2 ka Mazhab hai jinko Hazrat Fatima binte Rasool Alaihis Salaam ne Allah ki Laanate bheji thi
7) Sunni, Munkir-e-Rasool ke Sunnat ka Mazhab hai!
8) Sunni, Munkir-e-Quran ke Sunnat ka Mazhab hai.
9) Sunni, Peshaab aur Khoon se Surah Fatiha ko Bemaar ki Peshaani par likhne ka Mazhab hai!
10) Sunni, Rasoolullah ke Namak-Haraamio ka Mazhab hai!
11) Sunni, Kafiro ka Mazhab hai!
12) Sunni, Rasoolullah ke Gaddaaro ka Mazhab hai!
13) Sunni, Rasoolullah ke Har Gazwa se Farraro ka Mazhab hai
14) Sunni, Choro aur Dacaeto ka Mazhab hai!
15) Sunni, Allah ke Laanatio ka Mazhab hai!
16) Sunni, Munafoqeen Sahabao aur wunki Betio ka Mazhab hai
17) Sunni, Munafiq aur Behen ka Beta Umar bin Sahak binte Khattab ka Mazhab hai
18) Sunni, Haraami aek saath 3 Talaaq ki Haraami Paidawar hai.
19) Sunni, Nikah-Hahala se apne Baap ke bhi Bhai hote hai!
20) Sunni, Maula Ali AS ke Bageeo ka Mazhab hai
21) Sunni, apne Ammi, Behen aur Betio ke Mammo ka Dood 10x Pilwakar, Namehram ko Mehram banaane ka Mazhab hai!
Then you have insulted Rasoolullah and His Ahlul-Bayt of QISA.
None of them gave their Bayat to trhe Dacoits!
Who did the Bayat of whom in Gadeer, on the command of Rasoolullah?
Why is the grave of the legitimate owner of FADAK and legitimate INHERITOR of Rasoolullah and the richest business person Hazrat Khatijah binte Khuwalyd RA a secret?
Why was the grave of the legitimate Khalifa Maula Ali AS a secret for about 200 years?
These are the proofs that the 33 of Saqeefa were Munafiqeen, Murtad, Dacoits, Murderes, Terrorists and Legitimate Bastards!
AstaghfrAllah. Sunni Islam is the religion of Iblees
لَعٌنِ أّلَلَهّ عٌمًر وٌعٌأّئشُـةّ⏳
in conclusion all this talking are we defining that the Holy Koran to be the word of God or are we talking about the spiritual belife of a group of human beings that brought forth the religion of Islam in according to the spiritual belief of a culture of a group of human beings like myself ? better fix the issue and bring forth the truth Sunni and Shia together as soon as possible otherwise no one would believe you God bless you both and may he guide you towards the truth to bring it forth
NCL 2023 SEASON 2
LIONS VS BRAVES
Silver20$$ IN USD IN NED
GOLD 35$$
Ultra gold 55$$ aluminum 85$$ VIP 100$$ VVIP 135$$ VVVIP 274$$ VVVVVIP 475$$
So Shias get their deen from a German lmaoooo
Even Germans know about the wickedness of Aisha the adulteress
No brother this book written by the references of Sunni books
Are they authentic ahadiths????
Because the Quran defends the wives of the prophet
So idk what those books are but yeah they’re probably fabricated
@@Abu-Yazid22 33:33 of the Holy Quran was for Ayesha but she ended up disobeying Allah (swt) and the Holy Prophet (sawa) at the battle of Jamal.
@@thatshiairaqi no Aisha r.a never disobeyed Allah!! You are wrong