EXORCIST: BELIEVER (Spoiler Review) - The Patriarchy COMPELS YOU!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- Just when we thought we were safe from Exorcist sequels, David Gordon Green comes along and makes a direct sequel to the orignal film. After the smashing success that was his Halloween trilogy, he's now ready to elevate another of the most iconic horror films in history. Is he up to the task?
Check out all our videos and subscribe!
/ @hardcutreviews
Music by @whitebataudio
#exorcistbeliever #exorcist #moviereview #horror #halloween #halloweenends #blumhouse #davidgordongreen #jasonblum #exorcistreview #horrormovie #shocktober
Gotta love when they try to make an excorcism inclusive for a modern audience.
You love to see it.
SUPER BEST FRIENDS 😂
It can be inclusive without the only point of the movie being a moral lesson on inclusivity which is what this was so fuck this movie. The dude who ruined Halloween ruined the Exorcist.
Well you do realize most xtians. Were NOT catholic in 1973 right? So that little attempt at….A dig at some group I’m sure kinda falls flat. What you thought those were generic non denominational priests? 🙄😂
Oh Im sorry - perhaps I was a bit unclear. I meant to say the movie is shit. Does that compute or do I have to draw you a theological schematic?@@6Haunted-Days
What genius thought of that thumbnail?! Pazooozooo in a p#$$y hat 😂
It fits BELIEVER 😂
😂😂😂
Slay queen
I hollered 😂😂😂
“I. AM. PUSSZOOZOO” -modern audiences (2024)
The girl could not be killed because of a blessing.....a blessing so powerful it didn't stop her from being possessed.
Let the writers stay on strike because a 14 year old can spot that plot hole.
That’s not true. Angela’s father didn’t choose one girl over the other and Katherine’s father did. It was a trick.
The first one still gives me the creeps- it totally holds up. Solid story, compelling characters, everyone's motivation makes sense, etc. etc. I don't even wanna bother with this new garbage. Why do they have to ruin everything with an agenda only like 10% of people pretend to care about?
That's the age-old question, and one of the main reasons why our channel exists.
The cinematography of the original is the most difficult to achieve BECAUSE it was so naturalistic. Many movies of the 70s and 80s have that look, like Coming Home, French Connection and Midnight Run. Even Jackie Brown, which is supposed to be like a movie from the 70s, had that look! Anyway, I think that films that used to trust actors to fill the frame with their acting in medium and wide shots and don't overdo the lighting, the angles or editing until appropriate are glorious! The power of Sydney Lumet compels you!
Its always bad when a "serious horror movie" makes me laugh out loud several times. This was an embarrassment to the orginal.
The movie is implying that all roads lead to God, which then makes none of the religion mean a damn thing. It's a pathetic copout and a slap in the face of the original's convictions. I literally pray this movie bombs so hard that it will cripple the possibility of a trilogy.
With a 30M budget, you can bet they're already working on part 2. This new one has already pulled in more than double that.
@@hardcutreviewsGod damn it. 🤦♂️
The final act was the "coexist" bumper sticker coming to life. Happy anniversary fellas.
Lol. Facts.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
what's wrong with coexisting? is coexisting woke now? lmfao @@hardcutreviews
No, there is nothing wrong with coexisting with members of other religions. That's not "woke", that's called having neighbors. LmFaO. The issue is that the world of The Exorcist is a catholic world. This was established by the cathothic author of a book that was made into a catholic centric film. Catholicism does not recognize these other religions in these matters so now you're up against a massive plot hole from the beginning of the story. It's lazy writing. We said in the review that if you want to tell a story about a group of exorcists from a different religion, then go for it. But by setting this film in the universe of the original Exorcist, you're ignoring the lore set up in your own franchise. @@fuentesdevidamusic
But of course with that voodoo coming out on top....girl couldn't die because of a blessing.
A blessing so powerful it allowed her to be possessed in the first place.
What they did to Chris in this movie is absolutely insane. DGG went in there with no knowledge of the nuances of the story(I don’t think he even watched the original) and shit out a movie with the obligatory cameo. If anyone wants a good wrap up/a spiritual successor to the 1972 movie, I’d highly recommend Season 1 of The Exorcist tv show!
I just started watching the show. Its actually pretty good. Lot better than this fucking shit. I also highly recommend the directors cut to exorcist 3. The theatrical is good too but had a lot of studio interference. The directors cut is more true to blattys vision.
That was a killer show and you're exactly right season 1. I wish they got the nuns more involved. I'd love to see nuns whup the demon. That would be tolerable woke for me. Even the gay priest.
Read the book. Karras died in victory. He didn’t go to Hell. Blatty discusses this in interviews. But, I agree. The new movie broke the 4th wall with the patriarchy remark. Everyone, including the characters, knew that was a BS line.
It’s been over 25 years since either of us have read the book and there are some differences between the book and film but thanks for clarifying on the Karras sacrifice. That makes sense. Will have to read it again before Deceiver hits theaters and sinks the franchise even lower.
@@hardcutreviews yes! Same. I decided to reread it after watching “Believer”, and I’m glad I did.
Good call. Will check out some of those old interviews as well.
A film made by people who saw The Exorcist, but didn’t actually understand what it’s about. A half-assed rush job made solely to capitalise on the 50th anniversary of the original. What an absolute train wreck.
What made the original so good is that it was based on a true story. The only other exorcism movie that was good was THE EXOCISM OF EMILY ROSE, another movie based on a true story.
And that's probably the only other truly effective demon possession flick...
not only that, but it was shot in a way that made it feel *authentic* (the director, Friedkin, had a documentary background iirc)
""""""""""True Story""""""""""""
Great review! You saw through everything they did to destroy this story.
I admit - the only reason I paid money to see this film was because of Ellen Burstyn, and they destroyed her. "The Patriarchy" line was so uncalled for. Like you said, Believer started out nicely, then the director couldn't stop himself from going the gratuitous route, over-using CGI, and forgetting what made the original so good. All I can say is if this is the first of a proposed trilogy, don't bother.
It's a shame. Started off ok then went off a cliff.
David Gordon Green loves to ruin the classics. First Halloween and now the Exorcist!
Moving forward Blumhouse, keep this man away from any more classic horror sequels.
He should stick to contemporary originals.
@@hardcutreviewsmainly comedy and shit buddy films
@@hardcutreviews I wouldn’t even give him that. Just keep this man off the filmmaking medium, period.
Green already signed a deal to do a Hellraiser TV show. No joke.
@@derkeheath5172 Jesus Christ
Rumor has it Pazuzu will be a Black lesbian in the next entry
She’d have to be the hero.
Of course the white girl went to Hell. 🤣🤣🤣
This review was absolute quality - some of the dry and absolutely spot on observations were priceless It had me laughing on several occasions - keep up the good work.
Appreciate that, dude.
If Patriarchy is so bad why I'm I still asked to kill spiders and open up jars for the matriarchy? Yeah I thought that part was just taking a shit on the graves of the 2 men who died saving Regan! It's just a DGG virtue signal in yet another classic horror franchise! Cause thats all that matters these days lol! Great Channel Cheers!
YOU are so right! Quality, integrity, truth: all things of the past. Now it's all about the all mighty dollar. I guess it's yet another example of the apathy and entitlement that seems to be rampant these days.
Congratulations Gentlemen on your 1st year,, absolutely the best channel to check out a movie review on, Entertaining and informative! The movie The Exorcist, was still the best horror film I’ve seen, being 17 when it came out, it was at the apex of horror for the boomer’s generation. It changed the look of film as much as Bonnie and Clyde did in 1967.
Will I check this out,,,, maybe the first half? Thx again for another solid review!
Thank you, sir. The original is still relevant today. This film is a poor attempt to recreate the original with none of the gravity.
This movie started off okay and I enjoyed the first half of it. I felt exactly the same way you guys did about that part. But it fell apart after Ellen was brought in. I noticed the 'patriarchy' line too but forgot to mention it in my own review. David Gordon Green has proven himself to be an untrustworthy director. I'm now convinced that his solid performance on Halloween 2018 was a fluke.
Would rather watch Halloween 2018 any day of the week over this. At least that was fun. This had a promising start until they remembered they only make movies for the “modern audience” now.
there always has to be a caveat that one of his identical halloween movies was not so bad. they were all shit, okay?
Nah, 2018 was great and I loved it. The other two were shit.
@@CynsCorner okay.
The second movie is going to have the entire town running around with holy water and crucifixes trying to take down the demon and they’ll feel bad for two seconds because they accidentally exorcised the wrong girl and then continue hunting the real demon like nothing happened, then the third movie is going to follow a new character who slowly loses their faith until they’re possessed for six minutes and then exorcised before the actual climax of the movie starts, and Ellen Burstyn will have no problem beating the shit out of Pazuzu in her kitchen.
Sounds about right.
I found enjoyment in this movie, however, the film The Possession is proof that this kind of film can be done with other religions in mind. The Possession is a Jewish exorcism movie. I liked that film as well and thought the Jewish spin was unique for this genre. The Exorcist Believer could have gone down a similar path instead of trying to include multiple religions. However, I thought the film was okay for what it was, a mostly generic possession movie.
The idea of other religions coming in and showing how they deal with demonic possession are interesting and deserve their own films, such as The Possession. That film doesn’t exist in this “Exorcist” universe. It was a hard sell for us since they came in and just piggybacked off of the legacy and name in a world that is established as Catholic. If they had not done that I think you would have seen less criticism. Appreciate the comment.
That thumbnail 😂
The writing was on the wall with he dogs fighting in the opening. Right from that point. At best, it's saying this is a poorly made copy.
A little throwback here and there to let you know this is the same universe while taking a dump on that universe at the same time.
lol the thumbnail
I don't like how they bright her back just to poke her eyes out 😡
It comes across as dark comedy. She comes into the movie to criticize the original Exorcists only to immediately have her ass (or eyes) handed to her on a plate. It COULD be interpreted as her paying a price for her own hubris if I for a second thought the script was that smart.
@@derkeheath5172 the trailer made it seem like it was going to be all about her and that was the reason why I chose to watch the movie and was excited about it, the return of her character. And then she's barely has any screen time and they poked her eyes out wtf
You guys are terrific.
Appreciate that.
Y'all are hilarious. I am going to add your channel to my watch list.
The highest praise. Thank you, sir.
Glad I found this channel , the critique, analysis and commentary hits the nail on the head. Thanks for calling out how woke agenda "diversity" garbage has taken a shit on yet another classic movie's legacy.
Thanks, dude. Appreciate the comment!
Just stumbled across your channel. Looking forward to your reviews in the future.
Thanks, dude!
I haven't seen the movie but based on your description. By the Christian view, the demon won.
The demon killed the unsanctioned dollar store priest because he wasn't a Exorcist and still he was the only legit threat 😂
The demon got a girl soul and convince the dipshits the freestyle religious stuff worked.
Pazuzu is going to stop being a laughingstock in Hell for losing to a faithless priest and a 99.9% dead exorcist.
The demon 100% won. It gave the families a choice and the “Christian” guy played along.
@@hardcutreviews I feel like this embodies the joke of a 100 chimps with time can write Hamlet. Crap movie but at least it makes sense in that way. It's a shame Chris became an ass.
I think the higher ups either went through a period of transition or the existing ones forced revisions late in the game.
Best analogy of the film I have ever heard. Great job!
Burstyn needs to take a lot of heat for this. They begged her to be in it, and as part of the original that made her a lot of money and fame, she should have looked at that line and refused to read it. What were they going to do? Fire her over it? They needed her.
Instead she utters a line that shits all over the meaning of the original....
Time to stop blaming only studios and writers. Harrison Ford sold out to destroy two legacy characters, but all we hear about is Kennedy, Disney and Phoebe what's her name....Ford agreed to this, he is complicit.
Burstyn spit on her own legacy in a movie she was in for fifteen minutes then stabbed off because her prescreens was a bait and switch.
Screw this movie and anyone who gives Green another horror movie to ruin.
100% She could have just said, No, stop calling me. Go make your own iconic film. She was completely complicit in it. Most actors don’t get to say they are not going to say a line. She was in a rare position where she held a lot of power and could have shut that down. It’s baffling. Same with Ford. I mentioned that way back when we reviewed the Indy 5 trailer. He keeps agreeing to this trash. It wouldn’t exist if he just said, no this is garbage. What can they do? They are relying on these legends on to come back so people will go see it.
*How PROGRESSIVE to show nothing but contempt for the two brave men that DIED saving your daughters life*
Peak toxic masculinity.
ummm.... Where do I get a Hard Cut tshirt?!!?!
They go on sale when we hit 10K subs, lol.
I'd love to see you guys take on Exorcist 3 and give it some love. I know the RLM guys did it years ago, but, I love that movie.
Exorcist III is seriously solid.
The group that tried to perform the exorcism, remind me of a story in the Bible.
Theseven sons of Sceva attempt to remove an evil spirit from a man, only to receive a resounding beating. Rather than the demon fleeing the man, Page 2 WHY DO THE SEVEN SONS OF SCEVA FAIL?
the seven sons of Sceva are forced to flee the house naked (Acts 19,13- 17)
You guys are great I'm glad I found this channel. I predict you guys are going to be big this is going to grow so much.
Thanks, dude. Appreciate that.
The 2 girls acting was good
I never knew this channel channel existed until I came across this video and i can say i am a huge fan! Your review was better than the movie😅
This review was spot on everything you guys said was 100% true, insightful and hilarious! You gained a subscriber.
Thanks! Appreciate it!
You guys lost me when you said the main actor was good. That was one of the most one-note, dull, emotionless performances I have ever watched.
He starts off okay enough. There's a decent foundation there for him as an everyman. Is he dull? Yes. Does his character inevitably go nowhere? Absolutely. We were just implying that he was fine enough and a decent actor.
@@hardcutreviews i respect your views but the character was put through hell and the actor wasnt able to show ANY emotion. Looking somber from beginning to end aint acting. He didnt bring it, at least for my taste.
Agree so much with all this. No way theyd be a sequel to this, david maybe shouod go back to doing comedies tho i liked Halloween 2018
Comedy seems to be his genre. Outside of H2018, the rest have kind of been bad comedies.
When Chris said "It's because of the patriarchy", that's when I completely lost interest in what the rest of the movie offered...
You felt the air suck completely out of the room. Funny how one line can ruin everything. I guess the writers never heard the term ‘subtext’ to get their messaging across in a more palatable way. Now characters just flat out say what the writers want to inject in.
You can't ruin a character worse than they did ellen
Can’t wait to see what they do with Regan in the sequel.
This movie was Unbelievable
Best spoiler review for this dog $h*t film, i had to subscribe for more. You guys nailed it and have awesome chemistry. I just watched this last night and they completely missed what made the original iconic.
THANK YOU for bringing up why did no one get arrested at the end, like wtf?
Thanks, dude. Appreciate you checking our stuff out. Yeah, they just gloss over the fact that there are dead bodies and blame no one. Surprised there wasn't a slow motion shot of the white parents getting led out in handcuffs.
If they had a video of Chris talking about Regan and Regan only as a little Easter egg, then had the dad doing research and eventually finding his way to an actual Exorcist then that would have not only make much more sense but made it 100% better. They didn't need Linda or Ellen at all.
I get the Haiti spiritual stuff had to come back in at some point because of the start but the OG Exorcist is based on Catholicism. They could have had the Haiti spiritual things not work to drive home they need a priest. They could have kept the church saying no and the priest praying and then ignoring their orders but, you know, NOT dying 2 seconds after? And then actually almost exorcising the demons and the other girls dad coming out with his choice. I thought that was actually a good twist. With cutting out a few other things (like the nurse all of a sudden becoming an exorcist because she regained her faith but still being present and her faith waning, the speeches, the boxing seeing as it NEVER comes up again ETC.) that would have saved the second half of the movie and it would have been decent. At least enough that people would actually want a sequel.
Basically everything you said would have made the second half of this film palatable. But it wouldn't be very modern of this film to take a dump on any other religion other than Catholicism.
The trailer was better than the movie. They even had parts that didn't appear in the movie at all! When Chris tells the demon "We've met before", It's not true because apparently the demon in this movie is called Lamashtu and it's not Pazuzu from the original...
Yeah, we’re learned about this other demon after shooting the review. It makes no sense for Chris to say that.
The Exorcist (1973) is Catholic centred - William Peter Blatty was Catholic after all - though I just wonna point out that Friedkin opens his film, as The Exorcist title appears, with the Arabic Muslim chant ‘Allahu Akbar’ (God is great), because Friedkin wanted a global sense of good vs evil on Earth. Catholicism is the focus and Catholics win the day in the original - thankfully Friedkin wasn’t ‘modern’ enough to do “Exorcists Assemble!” like in this latest pile of shit.
Father Karass didn't go to hell for killing himself. He sacrificed himself, which is John 15:13: "Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one’s life for his friends."
What an insult this movie is to the original. What a desecration of the material it is.
It's worse than Exorcist II: The Heretic because that film actually TRIED. They were a bunch of rich California New Agers so they knew nothing about The Exorcist, good and evil, and competent storytelling. But THIS abomination.
I'm sure they thought they'd killed it when they pitched it to the idiot diversity hire who green lighted this.
And then they went to get high to celebrate.
Thanks for the context with John. I was always a little unclear about whether he did or didn’t. Either way, still very impactful and purposeful.
Anyone who thought this was gonna be good, before it was released, are probably, those movie goers, who have season passes. Come on, two girls possessed at once, one black girl one white< Huh? Bums on seats Laddie. Bums on seats. The demon brought his brother along for the ride.
It was a rollicking good time.
Horror, or at least Monster/ demon/ ghost movies don't work anymore. The world has become a much smaller place today with all the technology we see real life horror constantly..
Lmfao! I'm rolling! New sub!
Appreciate it, dude!
The very SECOND I saw this was a Blumhouse movie, I knew it was going to be a disaster. I'm curious to see just how many beloved horror franchises get to be annihilated by David Gordon Green before somebody puts a stop to him. All this time waiting for a sequel, only to have this guy get his hands on it. Very sad!
Don’t know how they make these decisions. They’ll probably have him do a direct sequel trilogy to Psycho next.
Fantastic review guys. I agreed with EEEEVERYTHING you both said. What a disappointment. Subbed.
Thanks, dude. Appreciate that.
Thanks for the review guys. I’d sooner set my taint aflame than to watch that ridiculous sequel. Trying to follow up the exorcist is like the many failed attempts at trying to recreate the Texas chainsaw massacre.
God help us when they race and gender swap a remake of Jaws. 😂 Hollywood window licker$$$
A good flaming taint would have been more enjoyable.
If they wanted to make an exorcist movie without making an exorcist movie, they should have made The Making of The Exorcist. That would be interesting.
I’d watch it.
As an actual amateur exorcist, I'm offended by these characters 😂 Also, all diverse religions are valid in this fight!
>Demons only respond to Jesus' name and Christian scripture. 😂 Noooo he's a Kawanzza demon you guise! Reeeeeeeeee!
When I went with my friend and her son to see it, I remember after about the first 45 min I turned to my friend and said "this isn't so bad". Boy what a change after that 45 min. It went immediately into the dumper. I don't get it. I've never been to a movie that falls apart so fast.
It’s lulls you into a false sense of security and then… off the cliff you go.
chris mcneil and ragan have a falling out in the tv series because chris tries to monetize the experience in a book. i think the new movie tried to play off that.
Wow, so they were even less original than we thought. Let’s copy a thread from the TV show in our fresh sequel to the original.
David Hacky Green 🤣
Hi guys , new to your show. I like it alot, the rainbow 🌈 rating is hilarious, brilliant
Thanks, dude. Appreciate you checking it out!
Yo matt you look so young in that shirt.🧡
Aww thanks ❤
Dude that’s creepy af 😂
😂😂
She was a Hoodoo practitioner. They use the Bible a lot. It's a real thing in the American South.
Thanks for clarifying. Honestly couldn’t remember what she was representing. Wish they had gone into the background for that a little more to make it accessible for a larger audience.
Hoodoo?
@@hardcutreviews they handled it pretty slopilly
@@pinehawk9600 yeah. So, it's the practice that developed among African slaves in the Protestant predominant areas of the South. It uses the Bible a lot because those slaves were permitted to have Bibles. But it's a similar evolution as Voodoo. Though in Voodoos case, the predominant culture was French, and the French were Catholic, so the practitioners could disguise their dieties or spirits as saints.
Then they will bring old ladyEllen again to reprise her role from Requiem for a dream 😅
It had to be re shot. NY test audience hated it.
Well...I'm not sure if it was because I came in with low expectations, but I enjoyed it... I had reread the book when I heard this was coming out and I think this also make me enjoy this film. It was less religion and more cerebral. i think that's where they were going with the film.
Curious what moments you found to be more cerebral. The original is a deeply physiological film. In our opinion, they didn't push any of that further in this one at all. The demon didn't torment the father over his decision to save the mother until the end. It should have been getting in his head about that the entire film. Thanks for the comment.
Thank you for telling it like it is!!! The new Exorcist movie is a woke joke. Unwatchable garbage.
I would say this movie was a perfect metaphor for today's society in that the woke mobs ideas for what is good and works and will make society better, but actually is responsible for making it infinitely worse, more degenerate and terrible it has become. Everything they think is a strength is a weakness. Everything the think is inclusive is exclusive. Everything they think is good is actually evil. When the patriarchy line was said in the movie, I actually turned it off and refused to watch the rest. I've had it with movies, especially beloved ones being remade or 're-imagined' (which ironically have next to no imagination in them) being used for political agendas rather than what they were initially made for .......entertainment. It's truly incredible how so many people involved in such a franchise, especially one that cost half a billion to actually get to our screens, and THIS is what they came up with? This? A student film maker or even a big film fan could've written and produced something better. It just defies belief a collective amount of people with millions of dollars and technology, actors etc at their disposable can't come up with anything better.
You missed the riveting 3rd act where they all come together and try to beat the demon with multiculturalism. It was quite hilarious yet painful to sit through.
@@hardcutreviews Jesus f$_king Christ seriously? That would be funny if it didn't make me want to cry......So did you know if the trilogy has been cancelled then??? Please say yes haha
Lol I must be the only one who likes this movie, I thought it was neat that it was like a rag tag team of exorcist and also there was a nice struggle of morale, I felt like damn how are these amateur hour exorcist going to win
She should have reacted the way James woods, reacted in that exorcist spoof, was it scary movie, or 2?
Scary Movie 2 lol
I wish Peter Blatty was alive he would have never allowed this shit in my opinion the possession wasn’t drawn out enough, like the original so act two should’ve been the girls progression into being possessed, not going from being found to being possessed within the space of 10 minutes
Blatty would have hated this garbage.
@@hardcutreviews unfortunately being “woke” means more these days then a good movie they didn’t care in the 70’s and we shouldn’t now, I can’t believe Ellen Burston would even agree to say what she said
Couldn’t have taken much convincing to get her in the film. The script is awful. All 3 pages of her material.
Tbh she doesn’t look like she’s in good health anyway I’m pretty sure she was limited to how much and what she could do with that said that one line has left a sour taste in my month from someone I look up after seeing the original as a 8 year old
Even more of a reason to not waste the precious time they have left with her. But this is what they do with her.
Come for the exorcism, stay for the lightshow. 😏
The best part of the light show was the glowing demon breath that left their bodies and meant nothing.
I think they put in these woke tick points because these movies are aimed at 18 to 30 year old. They think they'll get brownie points for it.
It’s funny that they would aim a direct sequel to a film from 1973 at the youngest generation when the ones that appreciate the original are older. Please the 31+ group because Gen Z thinks watching movies on a phone is just as good as doing it in a theater.
Theyre systematically doing that with every great movie of the past. Adding diversity, equity, and inclusion....Its more like revenge porn
Can’t come up with your own story? Just cram a little DEI into a preexisting story and act shocked when people are like, wtf are you doing?
great vid, its nice to see people speaking out against woke nonsense
Appreciate you checking it out!
Exorcist Believer is going to be another Beginning and Dominion lol. As i heard that they are going to restart it again - now this could be just hearsay lol. I mean why The Exorcist? You cannot bring anything new to the table with a possession film as every film in this genere has the same tired checkbox tropes. Im suprised he didnt do The Omen - but its the Two Omen books post the original book trilogy would be interesting to see as films. But then again they would fuck it up no doubt lol.
It’s just a tired rehash of the original. Down to it being a little girl again. But this time two! I don’t know how many times you can retell the exact same story. There isn’t much room for deviation. They rebooted Omen back in 2006. That was terrible.
29:49 wtf? What movie is this?
It's one of life's mysteries.
It's the Seventh Seal. It stars Max Von Sydow who played Father Merrin in The Exorcist.
@@NotMorganFreeman. I saw that film and i don't remember that scene! that's crazy!
thank you!
I'm sure Executive Producer, Stephanie Allain was satisfied with the 'diversity' of religions - diversity and inclusiveness.
There were ideas there worth exploring but trying to do it this way fell completely flat.
So we're going to forget the fact that the mom removed herself from the room in the original movie?
No, it was the patriarchy.
I’m gonna guess the black woman was probably some type of Cajun who are Roman Catholics but also have Santeria in their beliefs. Probably some mashup. But I’d have to see the movie first. Except I don’t know if I’d be able to watch it because of “the patriarchy” lol. I’m out. This movie sounds evil. More attacks on Catholics and Christians. The assault on my religion through worldwide media and entertainment is glaringly obvious. And imo international. What does that tell ya?
It was very unclear what she was and what she represented. They tried to quickly explain it but it just felt like a mix of a few different things jumbled together. Once that patriarchy line hit, the movie derailed, went off a cliff, and exploded when it hit the ground.
Lmaooo
You are confusing voodoo and hoodoo.
Yeah we had no idea what it was because they didn’t bother offering an explanation in the film. Had to look up Hoodoo after the fact to understand what it was and who practiced it.
Great review of this stupid movie.
Appreciate it!
yall just dont get itttt, they show enough of the other family. They show how they lack of love and connection. and the movie is about connection and unity.and showed how unfied the daughter and father were while the other family was not
It was so bad that no one got it and no one cared.
Its a good film
Yeah, well, I liked the movie!
The first step is admitting the problem. Lol.
In the beginning I believed y’all when you said the movie is bad, now I’m convinced you’re just ignorant about other religions and didn’t like the fact that the yt family wasn’t centered enough in the story.
The Exorcist is a uniquely Catholic story. Bringing in other religions is stupid. Happy to watch a movie about exorcisms in other cultures/religions that don’t ride the coat tails of an established IP… like we said in the video.
It's like you didn't even watch the video at all.
If you are sitting around waiting for the exorcist” you missed the point of the whole movie. Not a particularly good movie, but that was a stupid comment.
Please, elaborate on the point. This will be a banger if it ever comes.
one throwaway line and the Beta's go wild... 🤦🏿🤦🏿🤦🏿🤦🏿🤦🏿
We often forgot how many willfully ignorant cucks there are in the world. Thank you for reminding us. And do give our best to your wife’s boyfriend. He’s doing yeoman’s work.
UM YES there is an exorcist in the exorcist believer.....there are actually several from different religions all at once.....bro this is far from desecration.....way too much crying lol
That’s not how anything in the established universe works, but ok. It’s a Catholic story, by a Catholic author.
What is this RLM knockoff 😂
Didn’t realize only one YT channel was allowed to sit in a room and discuss movies. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We’ll delete the channel immediately. 👍🏻
@@hardcutreviews if you're gonna rip off their style at least adopt their sense of humor
So we’re ripping them off by not having the same humor. Got it, chief.
Dude, RLM has gone down the tubes. They themselves admit they don’t like going to the theater to see movies-in fact, they WANT theaters to go out of business. Tip of the iceberg.
@@KyleCorwithyeah I stopped watching them when they started phoning it in (and sometimes it seems like they even resent their audience) so I was happy to find a new movie review channel that had a similar format and actually called bullshit out in modern movies.
I love how we’ve had two guys sitting in a room discussing movies since Siskel and Ebert and yet this OP thinks RLM invented this lol
Subscribed and liked!
Thanks! Appreciate that!
Why do gay couples have to wear the same shirts?
Elevated fashion instincts.
Considering how the dad chose his wife over his daughter to begin with I feel it would’ve been a more gutsy ending to have his daughter die at the end instead of the other kid
Good point. He makes that choice in the beginning but he ultimately makes no choice in the end. No guts in that ending.
I agree it would’ve been more effective; especially since her character was more established than the other girl. The next installment could’ve expanded on the other girls backstory.
Shit, you’re right that would have ruled
My understanding was at the end, he chose his daughter, rather than not choosing one girl over the other. Because they chose their own daughters, the demon won (they were willing to lower their morals and choose to save their own daughter and let the other die). That's why they both died. However, because of the blessing at the beginning of the movie, that blessing saved the daughter. Movie is still not good tho lol.
@@hardcutreviews
Imagine instead in The ending, all that buildup, all those Flashbacks during that scene with the 2 girls, with the man and his wife, You have a feeling on what the man’s going to do…..and……He says the word……He Chooses his Daughter Angela.
For a couple of new guys on the scene....Hard Cut is extremely well done. Keep it up guys.
Thanks, dude. Appreciate that.
💯👍
the original exorcist is one of my favorite horror movies, and Im glad I refused to see this. and ofc they had to *contextualize* the first movie with the patriachy nonsense. Like, she wanted to be in the room of her child's exorcism??? Soooooo stupid. I wish the whole house that the UN exorcism was taking place in burst into flames as punishment for everyone involved being so ignorant and unprepared. At least the critics are ripping this movie apart too and arent giving it a pass for being needlessly progressive.
as a side, im pretty disappointed in the horror movies that have come out recently for it being october. My boyfriend and I are really big on horror and theres literally nothing to see that we know wont be awful. FNAF is our last hope which is pretty scary lmao
Yeah- when even the shill media is trashing it, it's definitely garbage.
Ellen Burstyn, evidently, is known for not only her talent, but also her spunk. I'm very surprised she agreed to even say the line about patriarchy. She has been known to challenge a director or two, back in her heyday. It's almost as if they "used" her, who she is, as a lure to get the loyal fans of "The Exorcist", to see this movie. I'm sure it worked.
She agreed because that’s what she believes also. She’s a democrat and more than likely a feminist.
@@Aaremusshut up
@@AaremusUtter nonsense. If that were the case, she wouldn't have refused to do the movie time after time. She only agreed to do it after they quadrupled the offer to set up a scholarship for acting students.
How is the truth utter nonsense? That comment encapsulates the right wing perfectly...railing against reality. As if she can't change her mind over 50 years. @@nellgwenn
It's not the same demon, that's what makes it odd. The one in Believer is called Lamashtu, and it's a female demon (because afcourse it is - the patriarchy reigns in hell too, you know).
They did a really great job of establishing that it was a different demon by having Chris say… “we’ve met before.” A+ on the script.