There have been people mentioning that "he is not one of those good players and critizises way too much, because he is bad compared to them". Those people must understand: This critizising is the purest form of German culture. Germans constantly criticize stuff, and it is not taken as insult. In the grand scheme of things, it helps for imrpoval in all questions of daily life, methods, business, manufacture, etc.
"This critizising is the purest form of German culture. Germans constantly criticize stuff, and it is not taken as insult." Depends on what is criticized and in what form. It can certainly be .. exhausting at times ;) Anyway Chris, nice replay, thanks :)
Also ich fands einfach herrlich unterhaltsam! Zum einen die Englisch-Deutsch Hybridsätze die manchmal kommen, wenn er schnell redet und zum anderen die Sache mit den gepanzerten HQs, die ReviewGameX in wirklich jeder Wargame-Runde predigt xD Vielen Dank für die fachkundigen Analysen und weiter so!
All that talk about the riverside forest, and the misuse of tanks during midgame... It just goes to show you how a good diversion strategy can confuse even a spectator. One look at Redfor's eastward advance can tell you that the riverside mayhem (and armor sacrifice) was probably deliberate, to cause Redfor to split up and slow down before the town garrison got steamrolled. Very nice video, I'm still trying to learn the game properly, and this was some great help!
I really like your German videos... And now I watched this and it was so awesome :D. Your english is freestyle level 10000! :D Good video by the way :)
I don't wanna be a smart ass but.....(1) the "light" on the Centurion Mk 5 is an IR-search light (for night fights used with the appropriate goggles)...it was used back in the days as the tanks had no Thermal sights (Wärmebildgerät). The prob. was its an aktive device and both sides were able to track the IR-search lights...and (2) the Ontos have 6 x106mm recoilless guns...but still u r a good good gamer and analyst, when I'm big - I will challenge u...
Best players in the world? They make so many mistakes. At the beginning when he fights the pioneers with his Jaeger troops and the tanks keep firing at this infantry, he could've just moved his troops to the next building, which is not in plain sight of the tanks. He also took ages to move his infantry into cover. He could have avoided all this skirmishing, if he would have moved his infantry slightly quicker to destroy the incoming APCs before they were able to deploy their troops.
Biggest mistake both blufor and redfor made in this game was ignoring the western advance. Blu gave a nice shot with the helicopters that got red to overcommit on AA, but a single good force either way would've rolled up the entire flanks. Instead both sides dumped into a stalemate in the east. When you hit a wall, you go around it, not smash your head into it some more.
These guys don't play Red Dragon for the same reason I enjoy it, and that is pitting East vs West. They are both playing Blue forces for balancing reasons. It would be actually interesting if one side was to play a red deck
they are allies of the US, both were heavily influenced (Japan was rebuilt by the USA) by the States, and both are pillars of the western world in a region ruled by the eastern block ideologies (communism, china) and just simply Russia which is still the States's number one Nemesis.
Jawohl mein Herr! Did you send in ze sturmtrooper? You must annihilate zem, ja! : ) anyway, why do you have renegade nato forces? Looks like a revolution
In fact his english is really good, it's hard to comment in a foreign language. I speak english as a foreign language ar least as good as him, but to comment this would be a hard task even for me. Okay the accent is really funny... Jaja wirklich...
well... it"s not a ranked map ... it"S not a ranked game ... and non of the above is correct but i love to hear you make commentry in that german accent non the less ...you sound like those german generals in those ww2 movies so .. i will give you a like hahahaha
Arty is not a problem at all in the game. It only seems a problem for players of lower skills since they do not yet possess the skills in the game for pushing. Once u have the skills to push any arty will be pretty useless. Ofc u can always snipe 1 or 2 AA or inf, but for those 240points arty+75 fob u could have rushed in the sector with many many maaaaany units and win the games by conquest points. Destruction is a different story. But then destruction mode is not what any good player plays :.-)
+Johan Kettunen nerf everything is a constant topic on eugen forums^^ they ruined air power in WRD all bombers are suicide bombers and prices of heavy stuff are just insane for units that insta die. No wonder these great players use cheap units. Eugens listen the cry babies and now basically all units for each country are exactly the same! just the names and pictures are different. Without moding tools to UNBALANCE all that we wouldn't even play.
Its completely the opposite imo. Destructions point system doesnt really encourage to aggressive gameplay since capping a sector can cost a game. So when the front line is stable, both sides will just camp and arty the hell out of each other for easy points. 10v10 destruction is cancerous most of the times for that reason
the Point you're missing with These unarmored CVs is their availabillity. You get 6 of These per Card, while the armored ones give you not more then 4... thats the important difference, 'cause you need so many CVs in Conquest with all These CV sniping tacitcs. The other reason is, that 1 armor really dont helps a lot agains Bombers or even machine guns. If you choose to have CV tanks or CV inf in your deck you always Need a complementary Card of 6 CV Jeeps or you run out of them very fast
I am not convinced by ur point. If u need 6 CV so u can spam them in case of snipping why is then a armored one where u need less since they survive more snipping (ofc not all) not working? For the 1 armor point 1 Armor can do a lot for u. But more important, 10 hp compared to 5 hp does most for u. And u get it for just a few points more. Also I do not see how 1x 1000kg bomb is killing an abram cv or how 10 mg of helicopter would do that.
WTF...Gaming Well, ist not spamming, ist just not running out of CVs ;). What i mean is, when you choose to take a Card CV inf (3 CVs) or CV tank (also 3 CVs) most Player really like to get more then 4 CVs from the other CV Card. So the question is not, will a Abrams withstand a 1000 kg bomb, but will a fuchs Füfu (lovely Name) survive that. So ist not the Question between CV tank or Jeep. Its, getting 4 Füfu or 6 Jeeps. And you know that the survivability of a 1 armor Cv is really not that much higher then a Jeep. Allthough youre right, the biggest Advantage is the 10 hp. But still, i dont see that a Füfu would have survive against a SAS rocket or Heli spam.
The point is that even with armor 1 or armor 2 the CV can be sniped by the exact same things as a unarmored unit does, namely 1ton bombers, rocket jets and atgm jets. 90% of CV kills are probably due to these aircraft so there's very little reason to spend a extra 40p on them as well as the slashed availability.
Sleksa sleska 0 armor cv normally come with 5 hp instead of 10 like 1 to 2 armor cv. So they have a higher chance to survive most attacks. Also any arty bombardement on a av 0 is killing it very easily while a av 1-2 needs more hits.
ReviewGameX ASMR? Youve not heard? Look up the videos theres a whole community,basically its tingles and neural responses that one receives from hearing people whisper or crinkle objects, and other similar actions, to again give you a tingly sensation and help you feel relaxed and fall asleep. It would be similar to "white noise". I think your voice if very calming and soothing is why, to compliment you sir. =)
I think after one of our games he raged or something..I normally mute only for rage/insults/language. Nothing serious though..at least I cannot remember^^
I think the literal translation for Panzer is "Armor", so something like the Panzerkepfwagen IV literally means "armored fighting car" It's just kind of interesting to me how Americans think of tanks are some bulky block shaped thing made only for war, and Germans thought of it like a car they slapped a few tons of armor on it, gave it a cannon, and sent it out to ruin someone's day.
Well plus i disagree with some gemeral stuff he says. Command sniping needs no skill?well kinda wrong. And then if he says its a shame that such games are decided by command sniping, then why don't they simply play destruction. Because that's decided by kills instead of command points!
Because income in destruction is determined by command points so if you control less your losing fromm less income and probably less units. Instead in conquest income is constant and equal. Both game modes can have command sniping but one makes you take ground back after losing it were as the other makes it virtually impossible to take ground back from both lesser income and less units.
Quinn Steeves I have seen Destruction matches where one player controlled way less resources and had a small lead in points. So the enemy must attack. And the in the attack he loses way more units and points, because attacking more difficult than defending in Wargame. Then despite not having that many resources, the guy with a lot fewer resources wins decisively.
Quinn Steeves Okay, that's probably true, but saying that command sniping needs no skill and that it's a pity that the game is decided that way is still very wrong imho
Woah. Not the best players in the world though. Lol. -- 4 players with full armies... zero artillery/mortars (no bombardments, no smoke); especially considering the river cuts the map in half. all players should be working some sort of arty. -- lousy supply lines with no fobs; chopper supply should be supplying the forward vehicle supply trucks -- airstrikes are all launched perpendicular to the battle line; air should always fly in as parallel to the line as possible to improve evac routes and minimaize time over enemy aa ... for starters... ...2014, so I guess i can give em a break. but this is not pro play.
Those are not the best players...and win rate says nothing !!! About aplayer ability If anything ..it says the opposite..because total loser players use two account and win againt them selves in ranked... You want to know who is real good ? Look for players with more defeats than victories that got a high military rank in the game because that means they have beaten the best players and only lost to players in the same rank they have
There have been people mentioning that "he is not one of those good players and critizises way too much, because he is bad compared to them". Those people must understand:
This critizising is the purest form of German culture. Germans constantly criticize stuff, and it is not taken as insult. In the grand scheme of things, it helps for imrpoval in all questions of daily life, methods, business, manufacture, etc.
A good argument for german culture :-)
"This critizising is the purest form of German culture. Germans constantly criticize stuff, and it is not taken as insult."
Depends on what is criticized and in what form. It can certainly be .. exhausting at times ;)
Anyway Chris, nice replay, thanks :)
***** Oh the Iron E .. :)
***** but, they still lose in the end...
Do you do that in the middle of sex?
Nice video man :-) if you ever want a game then let me know
6:22 "all the helikopter, i mean wirklich all the helikopter" :D nice commentary and analysis m8, learned a lot x)
Also ich fands einfach herrlich unterhaltsam! Zum einen die Englisch-Deutsch Hybridsätze die manchmal kommen, wenn er schnell redet und zum anderen die Sache mit den gepanzerten HQs, die ReviewGameX in wirklich jeder Wargame-Runde predigt xD Vielen Dank für die fachkundigen Analysen und weiter so!
+U584 Ui das doch das hoi3 Ladebild :-) Bist mir direkt sympatisch.
Typical German Accent...
Thanks for the info :)
WTF...Gaming nicht gemeint um zu beleidigen, klingt einfach witzig
Awesome video man. I love listening to your commentaries.
All that talk about the riverside forest, and the misuse of tanks during midgame... It just goes to show you how a good diversion strategy can confuse even a spectator.
One look at Redfor's eastward advance can tell you that the riverside mayhem (and armor sacrifice) was probably deliberate, to cause Redfor to split up and slow down before the town garrison got steamrolled.
Very nice video, I'm still trying to learn the game properly, and this was some great help!
Great analysis of the tactics and the meta. More of these detailed discussion videos. This is very helpful!
Thx.
can someone tutor me for this game...
will teach english in exchange
I'd do that, but I've got Clan M8s teaching me EVEN nowadays!
i can help you with that)
+Orangeparty I'll tutor you in English _and_ Wargame if you tutor me in German. :P
forgive zis mann's german accent
I am not good but I need to work english.
Your match reviews are good, you deserve a higher view count.
+Dan Teivel I have a higher view count..at least on my german channel. But it doesnt matter, it is all about the fun for me.
You say so many german words in your english sentences... :D Sounds very funny. But still, your english is better than mine ^^
It is all about fun and that people can understand you :-)
I really like your German videos... And now I watched this and it was so awesome :D. Your english is freestyle level 10000! :D
Good video by the way :)
I don't wanna be a smart ass but.....(1) the "light" on the Centurion Mk 5 is an IR-search light (for night fights used with the appropriate goggles)...it was used back in the days as the tanks had no Thermal sights (Wärmebildgerät). The prob. was its an aktive device and both sides were able to track the IR-search lights...and (2) the Ontos have 6 x106mm recoilless guns...but still u r a good good gamer and analyst, when I'm big - I will challenge u...
Best players in the world? They make so many mistakes. At the beginning when he fights the pioneers with his Jaeger troops and the tanks keep firing at this infantry, he could've just moved his troops to the next building, which is not in plain sight of the tanks.
He also took ages to move his infantry into cover. He could have avoided all this skirmishing, if he would have moved his infantry slightly quicker to destroy the incoming APCs before they were able to deploy their troops.
For me best players are Putin187, Razzman, Kort right now
Very good assessment, old video, but still good.
Really nice analysis
outstanding analysis. subbed!
thx
You sound like Milton from Office Space.
Biggest mistake both blufor and redfor made in this game was ignoring the western advance. Blu gave a nice shot with the helicopters that got red to overcommit on AA, but a single good force either way would've rolled up the entire flanks. Instead both sides dumped into a stalemate in the east. When you hit a wall, you go around it, not smash your head into it some more.
These guys don't play Red Dragon for the same reason I enjoy it, and that is pitting East vs West. They are both playing Blue forces for balancing reasons. It would be actually interesting if one side was to play a red deck
Right, because south korea and japan are western.
they are allies of the US, both were heavily influenced (Japan was rebuilt by the USA) by the States, and both are pillars of the western world in a region ruled by the eastern block ideologies (communism, china) and just simply Russia which is still the States's number one Nemesis.
Jawohl mein Herr! Did you send in ze sturmtrooper? You must annihilate zem, ja!
: ) anyway, why do you have renegade nato forces? Looks like a revolution
In fact his english is really good, it's hard to comment in a foreign language. I speak english as a foreign language ar least as good as him, but to comment this would be a hard task even for me.
Okay the accent is really funny... Jaja wirklich...
What a great game
Good Denglish
It actualy BYE-son, not bee-son
Damn-son.
Just to toot my own horn, I've beaten Random before with an Anzac deck while he was using US.
well... it"s not a ranked map ... it"S not a ranked game ... and non of the above is correct
but
i love to hear you make commentry in that german accent non the less ...you sound like those german generals in those ww2 movies so .. i will give you a like hahahaha
Why arnent they using smoke or Arty?
Great video friend! Please make more English speaking videos like this.
Geil, ur name, i like it :-)
ReviewGameX Dein Englisch ist besser geworden :D
Pls. tell us the name of the game because I cannot identify from uploads which replay what you recoreded.
I just see it doesnt state the player names. But i looked it up, it was" competitive 2vs2 - Shatzbots vs WTF?.
WTF...Gaming
Thx.
Hey Kumar can you add subtitles?
Is there any kind of chance to add new maps to this game? As it is getting so boring with the limited number of maps
So, I didn't see any artillery, and yet, "nerf artillery" is a constant topic on the forums. Why is that, where is all the artillery?
Arty is not a problem at all in the game. It only seems a problem for players of lower skills since they do not yet possess the skills in the game for pushing. Once u have the skills to push any arty will be pretty useless. Ofc u can always snipe 1 or 2 AA or inf, but for those 240points arty+75 fob u could have rushed in the sector with many many maaaaany units and win the games by conquest points. Destruction is a different story. But then destruction mode is not what any good player plays :.-)
WTF...Gaming
Gib doch mal ein paar Tips fürs "pushen"! Bin auch ein Neuling!
+Johan Kettunen
nerf everything is a constant topic on eugen forums^^ they ruined air power in WRD all bombers are suicide bombers and prices of heavy stuff are just insane for units that insta die. No wonder these great players use cheap units.
Eugens listen the cry babies and now basically all units for each country are exactly the same! just the names and pictures are different. Without moding tools to UNBALANCE all that we wouldn't even play.
thx for this,what replay is this on the link you posted?
Check the player names pls.
I just see it doesnt state the player names. But i looked it up, it was" competitive 2vs2 - Shatzbots vs WTF?.
helicopter = chopper :-D
But I believe the english call it also helicopter. But u r right, chopper sounds so much cooler :-)
WTF...Gaming Helicopter sounds cooler. Or, "Hubschrabbschrabb"!!!
WTF...Gaming To me chopper sounds like Orks in Warhammer 40K.
why dont they play in total destruction
Taurion Martell Cause it is a noob mode :-)
ReviewGameX that explaines why i play it then ;)
Its completely the opposite imo. Destructions point system doesnt really encourage to aggressive gameplay since capping a sector can cost a game. So when the front line is stable, both sides will just camp and arty the hell out of each other for easy points. 10v10 destruction is cancerous most of the times for that reason
@@Lagmaster33 1v1 to 4v4 destruction is fun tho. But conquest is also fun. It's all fun
the Point you're missing with These unarmored CVs is their availabillity. You get 6 of These per Card, while the armored ones give you not more then 4... thats the important difference, 'cause you need so many CVs in Conquest with all These CV sniping tacitcs. The other reason is, that 1 armor really dont helps a lot agains Bombers or even machine guns. If you choose to have CV tanks or CV inf in your deck you always Need a complementary Card of 6 CV Jeeps or you run out of them very fast
I am not convinced by ur point. If u need 6 CV so u can spam them in case of snipping why is then a armored one where u need less since they survive more snipping (ofc not all) not working?
For the 1 armor point
1 Armor can do a lot for u. But more important, 10 hp compared to 5 hp does most for u. And u get it for just a few points more.
Also I do not see how 1x 1000kg bomb is killing an abram cv or how 10 mg of helicopter would do that.
WTF...Gaming
Well, ist not spamming, ist just not running out of CVs ;). What i mean is, when you choose to take a Card CV inf (3 CVs) or CV tank (also 3 CVs) most Player really like to get more then 4 CVs from the other CV Card. So the question is not, will a Abrams withstand a 1000 kg bomb, but will a fuchs Füfu (lovely Name) survive that. So ist not the Question between CV tank or Jeep. Its, getting 4 Füfu or 6 Jeeps. And you know that the survivability of a 1 armor Cv is really not that much higher then a Jeep. Allthough youre right, the biggest Advantage is the 10 hp. But still, i dont see that a Füfu would have survive against a SAS rocket or Heli spam.
The point is that even with armor 1 or armor 2 the CV can be sniped by the exact same things as a unarmored unit does, namely 1ton bombers, rocket jets and atgm jets. 90% of CV kills are probably due to these aircraft so there's very little reason to spend a extra 40p on them as well as the slashed availability.
Sleksa sleska 0 armor cv normally come with 5 hp instead of 10 like 1 to 2 armor cv. So they have a higher chance to survive most attacks. Also any arty bombardement on a av 0 is killing it very easily while a av 1-2 needs more hits.
They are not "blinking".
Ähm...
Do you have look after some words befor you make this?
+GrachLP Yes I prepare a script for all my videos :-)
You should do ASMR whisper videos in English you have a nice voice
cool video
mauigio What is ASMR whisper?
ReviewGameX
ASMR? Youve not heard? Look up the videos theres a whole community,basically its tingles and neural responses that one receives from hearing people whisper or crinkle objects, and other similar actions, to again give you a tingly sensation and help you feel relaxed and fall asleep. It would be similar to "white noise". I think your voice if very calming and soothing is why, to compliment you sir. =)
Missiles not rockets, rockets are unguided weapons.
A little bit Zerman aczent you havez zere
Jaaaa ze ordnung!
sind hunter und random schweizer?
Wow the best player back then is worse than current level players.
This is not shize!! In fact das is fablehaft!!!!!
i dont recall playing at this map !!!(jokie as if i was the best )
why did you mute players like Shade?
I think after one of our games he raged or something..I normally mute only for rage/insults/language. Nothing serious though..at least I cannot remember^^
Pänzer :DDD they are called Tanks in english ;)
You can also say Panzers.
Germania Unleashed The correct plural is "Panzer". The singular is also "Panzer".
johann sebastian bach In german, yes.
I think the literal translation for Panzer is "Armor", so something like the Panzerkepfwagen IV literally means "armored fighting car"
It's just kind of interesting to me how Americans think of tanks are some bulky block shaped thing made only for war, and Germans thought of it like a car they slapped a few tons of armor on it, gave it a cannon, and sent it out to ruin someone's day.
Hi, I sent you a RUclips PM.
это мультиплеер???
да
The Ontos is terrible. Not just fuel, it's also slow af. And no, you don't just drop them, that is so wasteful :(
+Solar Hamster Ontos is the best vehicle for defense purposes. U dont drive around in your own backyard :-)
Is this still the meta game?
no
Can you teach me german
Well plus i disagree with some gemeral stuff he says. Command sniping needs no skill?well kinda wrong. And then if he says its a shame that such games are decided by command sniping, then why don't they simply play destruction. Because that's decided by kills instead of command points!
Because income in destruction is determined by command points so if you control less your losing fromm less income and probably less units. Instead in conquest income is constant and equal. Both game modes can have command sniping but one makes you take ground back after losing it were as the other makes it virtually impossible to take ground back from both lesser income and less units.
Quinn Steeves
I have seen Destruction matches where one player controlled way less resources and had a small lead in points. So the enemy must attack. And the in the attack he loses way more units and points, because attacking more difficult than defending in Wargame. Then despite not having that many resources, the guy with a lot fewer resources wins decisively.
ForceM1782 yes exactly. Destruction promotes camping and defensive play which is boring.
Quinn Steeves
Okay, that's probably true, but saying that command sniping needs no skill and that it's a pity that the game is decided that way is still very wrong imho
Pfft I can tell u now they're not even close to the best players.
Woah. Not the best players in the world though. Lol.
-- 4 players with full armies... zero artillery/mortars (no bombardments, no smoke); especially considering the river cuts the map in half. all players should be working some sort of arty.
-- lousy supply lines with no fobs; chopper supply should be supplying the forward vehicle supply trucks
-- airstrikes are all launched perpendicular to the battle line; air should always fly in as parallel to the line as possible to improve evac routes and minimaize time over enemy aa
...
for starters...
...2014, so I guess i can give em a break. but this is not pro play.
Those are not the best players...and win rate says nothing !!! About aplayer ability
If anything ..it says the opposite..because total loser players use two account and win againt them selves in ranked...
You want to know who is real good ? Look for players with more defeats than victories that got a high military rank in the game because that means they have beaten the best players and only lost to players in the same rank they have
hay wtf gaming hast du wargame airland battle und wenn ja kann ich mal mit dir spielen?
I can barely see a recon unit in the red team..... who said they are the best player.
not so great sad full of nonsense information
Like this comment? :-)