Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
INS Viraat 2 : 4 Aircraft Carrier for Navy ?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 апр 2022
- / discord
Our Web:alphadefense.in
*******************************************************
Join us on Social Media.
FB: / thealphadefense
Twitter: @alpha_defense
Instagram: @thealphadefense
Alpha Defense Hindi: / alphadefensehindi
#AlphaDefense #IndianArmy #DRDO
We need a fleet of 60 Subs, 25 destroyers, 30 Frigates, 45 Corvettes and 20 Minesweepers. 3 carriers.
Be realistic bro....
Submarine will be so late, but others can be fulfilled or may be take time
25 subs is more realistic target
We need a fleet by 2036-38:
24 SSK
8 SSN
8 SSBN
24 Destroyers
32 Frigates
18 ASUW Corvettes
24 ASW Corvettes
24 FAC/Missile Boats with Displacement of 800-1000 tonnes
24 OPV armed with 76mm Naval gun,2 CIWS & 8 SR SSM
4 Helicopter Carriers
3 Aircraft Carriers
18 Minesweepers
36 Rafale M & 90 TEDBF
48 MH60R, 80 IMRH NAVAL
48 IMRH ARMED for Helicopter Carriers
150 ALH MK3 NUH
18 P8I Poseidon,18 Kawasaki P-1/A320/321 MPA
12 C295 MPA for Coast Guards
24 LR Bombers
48 UCAV (18 Ghatak+18 IAI Eitan +12 Rustom 2)
6 Regiments of BMD + 6 Regiments of XR SAM+ 6 Regiments of Barak 8ER/Barak 8+6 Regiments of Akash NG+ 8 Regiments of VL SRSAM for Coastal Protection
Assault: 8 Regiments of LR LACM probably Bramhos ER with range of 800+km as Coastal Defense Batteries
Bro I have a question।
All imported ship cargo millitry fighter are big in size।
Any enemy can install gps system inside deep material wall or by manufacturing in it।
It is possible or any chance of it, it happened in past with any country or not???
Why not we make IAC-II be as Charles de Gaulle !!
Supports 30-40 fighters
Nuclear
Steam catapult system/ Emals
Same weight as Vikrant ~45k ton.
So we can get the platform within 7years.
Economical as well as giving the qualitative edge!!
Not so easy as ur words...
@@miralam2582 nothing right comes easy in life!
Indian Navy needs to enlarge itself adding capital ships like more destroyers, frigates and submarines within the next decade ...they Navy can deploy these ships to the new Carrier like Vikrant while if Vishal starts getting developed in 2030 it will take another 8 yrs or so to get launched... then Navy should be able to bear the cost ..if Indian govt. and Navy is thinking that they will not add numbers only quality then it will be a very wrong move regarding China as PLAAN is already adding ships not only in huge quantity but the newer ships are good in quality too...in this way Indian Navy will face huge challenges in maintaining the security of IOR in future
even with CATOBAR, chinese navy will find it dificult to operate so far from home with a stretched logistics chain...in contrast, 3 STOBAR carriers will pack more punch given that they will operate in their own backyard...as indian economy grows, we cam add more carriers later! in the age of VTOL UAVs...not having a flat top might not mean much of a disadvantage...its time navy stops thinking like USN and build to be able to think like one in future
@John Hero i think the time taken for a F35B to take off and land vertically u canlaunch two traditional fighters off the deck...the only advantage is when runway os out of commission, in which case its moot anwyay. yes to fly with full load u need catobar...but that will not happen before 2035...we canbuild a stop gap IAC2 in meantime...we dragged a veteran INS viraat for far too long...we can suddenly make a IAC2 for cheap and build more frigates with the money foregone by avoiding INS vishaal for now...because we might have to go for indigeous SSK in next few years...
All hype
Indian navy should capable to show its full potential ,. STOBAR have not much advantage , but CATOBAR do. Dont compare IN with USN . Indian navy have necessary of CATOBAR carrer ,. We have budget , we have BARC nuclear reactor .
@kalyan Gandhi woh indian u tube channel hai
Nowadays Alpha Defence is on its ultimate phase..... nice to see you 🤩🤩
Given the limited budgetary provision it is quite understandable that our Navy can not afford to have luxury of super carriers in multiple numbers but it should atleast must have the optimum numbers of them which is 3 in numbers at any given of time to have total dominance over the sea in our backyard.
India needs at least 15 aircraft carriers to ensure superiority in future confrontation with US!
I fully agree with you. But those carriers must have proper escort groups of DDG for LR AAW & ASuW and FFG for ASW with AO for resupply.And then there must be enough of these classes that after allotting ships to carrier groups the other operations of the navy are not affected.
If India continues the 3.2% defence budget, it will be 210-320 billion by 2030-31 and 600 billion PPP adjusted if we go full "make in India".
Yeah, 4 carriers shouldn't be a huge deal then
That would never happen.
We are spending 2.1 not 3.2%
@@Sacrafago90 govt. Has plans to increase in future
But the engines and much of the equipments including jets are imported costing too much and cannot be considered in terms of ppp.
@@stairwaytoheaven1719 india will make engine with rolls Royce
@@sigmachadtrillioniare6372 Our present carrier engines are from US,i think we will continue the same unless we develop our own engine.When we can deal with the boss why would we deal with little guys,so no for Rolls-Royce
Defence and isro budget need to be increased heavy specialy for isro too
Abe bhai ye America ya china nahi h jahan log amir h
Yahan free ka itna kuch sarkar deti h ki likhate likhate hanth me dard ho jayega mera
@@Vik_ash007 haa
Isro should give up launching pslv and gslv to industry and focus on developing bigger launchers and space station
@कुजो जितेंद्र । Kujo Jitendra we spend 2% and america spends 4% even china spends 2.5%
@@stairwaytoheaven1719 also mars and human missions in space
Do we have enough subs to defend Carrier Battle Group or we are just increasing our battle stake ...
Dont we need urgent replacement for fast depleting under waster arm of IN?
Yes we need additional carrier as well but with available funds we need to prioritise requirement.
we do have sub hunters
Very good analysis.India should increase our Aircraft carrier fleet as visal.its very encouraging for us
China = 40+ Destroyers_70+ Submarines_2 Carriers, 2 super carriers in future .....
Even if we compete it will take 100 years
🤣our requirements are 69420 times the procurement 🤣
India needed atleast 3 Ac (1) Western (2) Eastern (3) Southern Naval command. 2 Moveable fleet @ Andaman Fortress & Laqshdweep Fortress
Ok
4:01 A self contradictory logic being applied here when calculating the overall cost of 3rd Carrier.. On the one hand Navy says they want one Carrier each on each of the sea-boards.. And the 3rd as a reserve if one of the Carrier is not available due to maintenance/refit.. That means only two Carrier Battle Groups will be operational at any given time, third will be in maintenance or refit.. Then why should this 3rd Carrier (under maintenance) have the other Destroyer, Frigate, submarine etc. Ambiguity is the first enemy of success of a plan..
Navy also says they want CATOBAR carrier (the 3rd one )
Valid point, the formation ships can be same for both the aircraft carriers...
What you said would only make sense, if the Carrier Battle Group components like submarines, destroyers, frigates, etc are assigned to Aircraft Carrier in a completely modular fashion.
In times of crisis, Millitary can use them in modular fashion, but those are not really the optimal use case scenario.
3 carrier battle groups will be needed as even the battle groups will need maintenance and can't be switched with carriers and used all the time.
@@AlphaDefenseHindi i think indian navy should go with ssn and other things pakistan is a dead rat yes they still have some underhanded tricks but ins vikrant should be enough to intimidate china in indian ocean otherwise what our former cds said that we should go with more subs is more sensible i think pmo should increase their budget otherwise it will hurt navy alot becuase during war only navy will choke the chinese in indian ocean turning tides of war in favour of india
Indian Navy can go for 4 Lhds as for now and can think of INS VISHAL after or in 2030
or just put ins vishal on hold and remake another ins vikrant in 5 yrs.
Backward thinking will do india nothing. If the Indian government directs the money from all these useless corrupt public programs ins vishaal is a piece of cake.
Directly nuclear powered EMALS catobar aircraft carrier bnana CHAIYE... Kitna b late ho, aur hm loan pr b bna skte h bcoz future me GDP growth se pay kr skte h...
China ka 3rd carrier emals catobar hoga & 4th carrier emal catobar nuclear hoga...
So, as a superpower bnne k liye Krna chaiye....
& Shipyard ko LPD bnane ka order do instead of ins sister ship
*India should acquire 6 nos of 65000 Tons Nuclear Power Aircraft Carriers ,12 Nos Multi Role Amphibious Assault Ships, 50 Submarines with 10 SSBN, 10 SSN, 30 SSK,Along with Destoyers,Frigates,Corvettes,Minesweepers to maintain Maritime Supremacy in Indian Ocean*
I think the question here is not whether India should acquire a 3rd or 4th aircraft carrier,
the moot question is whether that 3rd or 4th carrier, can that be a CATOBAR type of aircraft carrier?
A CATOBAR and even a nuclear power plant can be installed in a Vikrant sized aircraft carrier. The French carrier Charles De Gaulle is a shining example of it. The problem here is the technology. The ones who have it won't share, and the ones who do share (Russia) don't have it.
That is I think the real predicament facing the Naval planners at the moment.
Haha.. bigger question is do we have enough planes for all these carriers.
@@AemondTomahawk Planes won't be a problem. By the time an aircraft carrier is built and inducted, it will be a good 8 to 10 years. In that time we might even see our very own desi bird, the TEDBF take to the skies.
The main problem is deciding on the platform from which those birds will operate.
@@finderskeepers7293 we have the EMAL/CATOBAR tech but it was decided not to be put on Vikrant to reduce cost.. for me putting on STOBAR feels kind of wasteful
I think most people don't know that both of our aircraft carrier have combined have less aircraft capacity then a single Nimitz class carrier , USA has 10 of these and will have 10 more (30+30)
We don't need to compete with USA..
It is a hostage Ally for nearly 40 yrs🤘
No. USA is planning to retire the nimitz class carrier and will have 10 more ford class carriers
@@GhantaRavan Good for Them and US then😅😅
They should bring this project ( IAC manufacturing) under National infrastructure pipeline. With this some fund could be drawn from the massive budget allocated for this.
Budget for NIP is 102 lakh crore.
India started from ground 0 and thats the best part because you have that infra to get past to better ships and subs
Love ins Visakhapatnam ❤️...plz India 🇮🇳 navy build more battleships & frigates .
45000 ton class conventional power aircraft carrier with 24 fighters + 6 electronics warfare fighters + 3 aewa + 7 anti submarine - multi role helicopter + 5 Ghatak Drone with steam catapult can be good combination in affordable price.
Seems lot of imagination
80,000 ton class is better
Thanks for update bhaiya
Good analysis as usual. Just wondering why there are always delays and projects are not initiated on time? Delays are main reason for price inflation and using out dated technology which doesn't give any edge.
The reason IN needs flattops is not so much Chinese navy as much as it is the ability to have an effective AEW cover. Ka31 doesn't quite cut ice. Since E2D is the ONLY effective AEW aircraft, IN doesn't have much choice, but go for CATOBAR operation. As also the fact that a flattop is capable of launching ac with higher payload. Even if India goes for Vikrant class 2, it would preferably be a flat top for the same reason. And it makes sense for IN to go for it, cos Vikramaditya is mostly a training ACC. Unlikely to be sent for any conflict. A replacement for that will in any way be needed, with or without Viraat.
If not chineese who else are we gonna fight in naval domain :) let's say the unsaid ;)
@@AlphaDefenseHindi It isn’t a question of whom we are fighting but a question of what we need to fight. IF there was an effective Osprey based AEW with E2D type capability, then, despite take off limitations, IN would have remained with STOBAR. Cos whether Rafale or TEDBF India would still be able to field potent systems against them. And it isn’t as if China wasn’t a threat when Vikrant was designed.
We need 3-4 45 tonnes aircraft carrier despite of type.
Good India navy 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Indian Navy should focus on submarine and Minesweeper
Frigates also ..
@@PraveenKumar-kt1qr yess...
High ambitions never comes cheap🌱🌱🌱
जय हिन्द जय भारत जय जवान 🙏🙏
JAI HIND🇮🇳
This is admirable that your channel and large no of its followers are concerned for our strategic preparations. However what we Indoans miss out on is professional planned strategy and execution by our Govt and forces. The procurement planning and decion making should be based on scientific methodology of war gaming to predict future war scenarios. Accordingly when we think of Indo-Sino theatre and naval engagements, logically we understand that Indian Navy is no USA navy and there's no chance of GOI telling Indian navy to enter South China sea and attack Major cities in Eastern China or coast or launch amphibious operations there. Going by present national strategic capbilities, Indian navy's normal role may be defending IOR and indian shipping lanes for trade and energy supplies. Atmost Indian navy will move on to choke malacca straits. Also we ahould not forget that our second adversary Pakistan's navy has no aircraft carrier no has any chance of getting one in forseable future. Considering these scenarios, Indian navy strategy experts should dwell upon the question that whether a third aircraft carrier is required. India already has advantage of Nicobars and Lakshdeep islands which can be utilized as unsinkable carriers by deploying 3-4 squardons of heavy weight fighters, Awacs, drones there for full coverage of IOR. India must take offer of developing Chittongan port by Bangladesh and deploy its warships there. Even if India aquires a 3rd carrier in repetetion of IAC-1 such small Indian carriers are of no use for offensive on China's own backyard, for which flatbed super carriers are required. What Indian war planners have been missing is getting into Chinese boots and finding out Indian navy's weakness. If China goes by its plans and field 5 carrier strike groups by 2035, they will atmost deploy 3 groups towards IOR, since ot will need to deploy to large carriers towards Pacific to balance American force formations. Indian navy will have advantage of fighting in own backyard, however what we really fall short in is sea denial capabilities in Nuclear Attack Submarines SSNs. Now with USA more open to helping India in reducing relaince on Russia, Modi Govt should take full benefit of this hour and negotiate a deal for 6-8 SSNs with USA similar to Australian deal with TOT clause. Once India gets this complicated miniaturised nuclear power plant and low noise propulsion technology experience, we can always manufacture more SSNs to develop a formidable force of 24-30 SSNs to take on our adversaries even in a worst scenario of 2 front war. So presently the funds should be utilized in a nuclear attack submarine project to aquire high end tech rather than on repeating limited capabilities small sized 45k mt carrier which anyways will not serve any purpose.
I know I will sound ridiculous but we should think out of the box.
I think we need multirole vehicle/fighter plane that can fly and land on ocean. That don't need protection like aircraft carrier do.
Imagine such 10 thing randomly go and sit in one side of the ocean, scanning ocean below and above.
High Technology would be needed but I think if we start doing it then this would over all solution. And cost will less.
First India need to increase its defense budget. We don't need to go for 4th aircraft carrier, 3 are enough. We should go for more diesel electric submarine, need 8-12 ssbn and 8-12 ssn submarine.. Calculation for 24 diesel electric submarine is old enough. Pakistan will have 8 submarine in future and china already have more than 70 submarine.. So i think we should go nearly 30 diesel electric, SSNs and SSBNs ..
For now we can use the gained expertise for building LPDs I guess, which we need in number of 4
Jitna export krenge utna budget issue km hoga... Otherwise every year sbi deal pr ese Rona pdega... & Decades tk pending rhe kr cancel kr denge
. It should be 55000 tons
Too big
CSL 45k ton displacement के चार LHA बना सकता है INS VIKRANT के PLATFORM को MODIFY करके जोकि US TRIPOLI CLASS के होंगे, वहीं पर NAVY को 65K TON DISPLACEMENT के IAC-2 के लिए UK ELIZABETH CLASS पर FOCUS करना चाहिए।
👍 Jay bharat 👍
Vary advanced technology setup
INS vishal should be at the priority of the navy because modernizing your technology is better than relying on old ones. Like use EMALS OR STEAM catobar. Go nuclear powered carrier even if it has total displacement of 60000 tons.
You are wrong in this case. IN also need to maintain numerical edge as we are at advent of hypersonic and aeroballistic missile. So quality an well as quantity is important for IN. Also for IAF 4.5 gen fighters are cheaper than 5th gen so they will take care of quantity and fighter like AMCA will take care of quality.
Why don't navy ask for budget increase. We know that we have 2 enemy in same sea we need bigger force to fight both of them at same time we need more than 3 aircraft carrier.
Quantity also matters
Need to develop the planned 4 LHDs in between
India's focus should be on aub surface vessels.
Anything above water is easy target with drones.
Future battles will change.
Seeking stealth is easier under water.
India should concentrate over INS Vishal. As you said earlier Navy may reduce their budget by going ahead with 45000 Ton class aircraft carrier instead of 65000 Ton class.
But it should not compromise with flat top, catobar system and nuclear power plant.
Air craft carrier banane hi hai to nuclear reactor propulsion engine ke sath banaao agar kharch jada hone se bhi bas ek bar hi hoga, fuel ke muskil se bach jayegi !
Against the speedy increase in the numbers of Chinese aircraft carriers India needs to go for more aircraft carriers in adequate proportions. Even mini aircraft carriers may be considered. To my perception India needs 4 large aircraft carriers and 2 or 3 relatively smaller aircraft carriers which could keep on board some 20--25 fighters and choppers at least. That will give teeth to our maritime attacking powers. Jai Hind.
Queen Elizabeth model UK ne offer kiya tha use kharid sakte hai kya?
We have focus on smaller CATOBAR aircraft carriers like Charles de Gaulle but in large number instead of supercarriers.UCAVs should be used in place of manned fighter on future aircraft carriers.
If the arena is limited to Indian Ocean then it looks like a good choice. Another INS Vikrant type can work in tandem with an immovable 'carrier' like Andaman. In fact Indian Navy should scatter its 'carriers' all over Indian Ocean, movable as well as static and make them work in tandem. We don't need super carriers to stop an invading force like China. Decentralised and synchronised platforms would be better.
जय हिंद
If we retain our order it's our best option too
*Indian Navy should definitely go with 45000 Tons with Nuclear Propulsion Technology*
No need for battlegroup, have 2 carriers in single battlegroup. This way it increases no. of deployable air assets and avoid RnD of new ship of bigger displacement. Just make another carrier in fleet mode, keeps costs low and tight timeline. If French and US gets the news of 4th carrier within 5-6yrs, they might even sweeten the naval jet deal.
JAI HIND 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳
Even in coming years INS Vikramaditiya will also get decommissioned as it is already very old use Russian aircraft carrier...
Jai Hind
4 active aur 2 reserved rakhni chahiye.....CARRIER BATTLE GROUP chaiye protection ke liye
Budget ki permission chhahihe. 😁
Paise tu dedena😒
Sala US aur China 15 Trillion USD+ economy hai
2 reserved pe kya football khelenge
@@AmongUs-qt3uo tum carrier battle groups se football khelte ho 😲🧐
@@tanmayadas68 dock kiye hue carrier ke sath battle group kyu chaiye
❤️
Indian navy should focus on to build an offensive capabilities drones,future warfare will decided by which Forces have technical superiority and advance drone technology.
But brother next generation frigates, destroyers toh already development phase main hai. Toh or ek IAC k liye extra frigates, destroyers specially thodi na banana padega.? Ins vikramaditya - Kolkata class destroyers+ talwar class frigates, Ins Vishal- p15b class destroyers + advance talwar class frigates,
Ins Vishal/virat- project 16 + nilgiri class frigates and by the way jab 2 carriers operational rahega 1 overhaul k liye jayega toh uske battle group toh Khali rahege.
Adding stobar carrier would be a foolish move but we can look for a smart and flexible option by developing heavy helicopter carrier which our navy can use it for limited fighter aircraft operation till the time INS Vishal is ready then after that it can be modified or restored for its original helicopter carrier operations.....just a wild thought from my end :)
Jai bharath
Indian should simultaneously work on Aircraft carriers,submarines,destroyers because if we only focus on carriers,it will be difficult for our NAVY to expand. And if we don't have CATOBAR tech then we shouldn't waste time searching for it and develope INS Vishal with STOBAR, and think abt CATOBAR of our 4th aircraft carrier
Yes aur 2 chahi hai.
WHEN MOSKOVA CAN BE DOWNED, THERE'S NO REASON FOR A CARRIER NOT TO BE. 3 CARRIERS ARE MORE THAN ENOUGH.
AT THE COST OF 1 CARRIER YOU ARE GETTING 5-10 SUBS OR DESTROYERS.
WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE 10 CARRIERS OR 100 DESTROYERS!?
NOW, FOR THOSE SAYING "PROJECTION OF FORCE", YOU POST 10 DESTROYER WITH 64 BRAHMOS WITH 700KM RANGE, JUST 20 KMS AWAY FROM ANY COAST, THAT IS WHAT IS CALLED POWER PROJECTION!!
INDIAN NAVY MUST GO FOR MORE SURFACE AND SUB SURFACE SHIPS! CARRIERS LOOK COOL AND ALL, BUT THEY ARE NO MORE PRACTICAL AT THIS AGE OF ADVANCED AND HYPERSONIC ANTISHIP MISSILES!
Aircraft Carrier Battle Group Is Like A Mini 'Super Power Of The Ocean' !!!
INS Vikrant In Arabian Sea
INS Vickramaditya in Bay of Bengal
Island 🌴AC In Andaman
When our economy grows then other investments
Already Vikramaditya is a floating throne
Many Things are Possible with Good Management Capability...
गुड न्यूज है तयार कर लेना चजिये
Jai hind
No.
Subs are the real need.
Military = not a fancy dress competition.
There Should Be, INS Vikrant Class Aircraft Carrier But With CATOBAR Conifiguration Like French Charles De' Gaule Where India Can Take France's Guidance After That Indian Navy Should Take Big Leap Like Should Aquire 65,000 Tonn "INS Vishal" CATOBAR With EMALS Powered By Nuclear Energy !!!
बात एक बड़ी गाड़ी... बहुत बड़ी गाड़ी..... की नहीं है... 🤔
बात ये है कि, पूरा काफिला भी खड़ा करना पड़ेगा। 🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑
जिसमें कई छोटी-बड़ी गाड़ियां होंगी सपोर्ट-एस्कॉर्ट करने के लिए😊😊🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
💙
Looking at our huge waters to guard we need to have atlist 4 as 1 will be in the servicing.
I must say navy should take time but atleast get a flattop nuclear powered super carrier.
But we dont have enough jets to place on those carriers
We need more destroyers and frigates not just aircraft carriers.
How much we need just asking
@@rahulezhava98 atleast 25 destroyers and 40 frigates and 40 submarines as well. That would be enough to protect India from any of attacking forces
@@darthashpie3370 so why this government going slow with submarines.
@@anujsethi7845 we just got 6 new conventional submarines . We don't have technology for SSN submarines. That's why talk is going on. India is used to importing instead of developing their own technology. It's gonna take some time to be self reliant.
@@darthashpie3370 lol Kaveri class running behind schedule.
P75I hasn't tendered yet it's also getting delayed.
In this government no new submarine contract given all projects were by vajpayee ji initiative.
Navy should use INS Vikrant for 1 year and whatever are the shortcomings and changes they observe should be reported and then in 2025 ship building company should be given the specs for INS Viraat 2.0. Definitely, Indian Navy should go for Viraat 2.0 for 5 billion and later in 2030 should go for flat top carriers but meanwhile you can't let shipbuilding company sit idle for 5 years.
India should construct 3 Rd aircraft carrier , 45000 ton based on Charles d goulle with TOT
What is flat top carrier? Is it ski- jump less carrier
Defensive budget aways high as compared to affensive budget...for example cost of bullet or gun always less than bulletproof jacket. Do we need to think on to make submarine hunter planes and develop aircraft hunter missiles to counter naval competition in indian sea. Meanwhile we can build 3rd, 4th or 5th Aircraf carriers as per our budget allocation.
I havequestion how indian navy protect its harbor form missle attack
Alpha defense do we are building anti air tank mounted system or misinformation
We can create a 45000 ton aircraft carrier with diesel engine like USS Midway it had catapults and was able to accommodate fighter jets ranging from A 6 to even the F 18 C Hornet before it's decommissioning so if we want an aircraft carrier and also we need it quick then best configuration would be that of the Midway class aircraft carrier
@John Hero maybe then we should put imported reliable GE boiler engines for a medium aircraft carrier with configuration like Midway and even if only 45000 at will give access to AWACS and a decent variety of new aircrafts to operate from maybe even AMCA could end up in our carriers if such catapult configuration is chosen and yeah only if boilers are present which seems unlikely as rarely any nations makes those
@John Hero but CATOBAR aircraft carrier are considered the best giving access to faster AWACS compared to helicopter AWACS which are slow and CATOBAR aircraft carrier has capability to launch aircrafts faster and with more payload.
And Midway a ship commissioned in 1945 if wasn't reliable how did it manage to remain in service till the 1990s that's almost fifty years
What if we use Viraat 2 in place of Vikramaditya...?
We must use our skilled worker to make new ACC if we did not make another one for a while we may loose the expertise of making ACC . Remaining part is budget India gov hav enough budget to make it. This months GST collection was 1.38 lakh karod rupees. Plus in future we can sell this Acc to other nation too. We can be exporter in this field.
We need third and fourth aircraft carrier
INS VISHAL Indian Nave me add hote hote INS Vikramaditya apne last leg me honge fir kuch saal baad Indian Navy firse 2 Aircraft Carrier me honge so Indian Navy and Indian Government ko jald hi final decision lena padega.
Time to make a duplicate of the Vikrant=5 years; time to make a flat top carrier=15 years.You pays your money and takes your choice.
It is possible to have a 4th carrier project as the 1st will achieve the retirement age when the 4th is completed so this can act as reserve carrier for future.🤔
India needs atleast 50 subs to dominate IOR. Carriers are just big targets!
But we need more submarines,frigates,destroyer than a aircraft carrier
We should purchase big one frm other countries 👍👍👍
Indian Navy's next flat top has to be a dedicated CATOBAR aircraft carrier without a shred of doubt . . . through private sector equity participation in future naval projects Indian Navy can acquire two brand new B.B. Patel class i-SMARTFuelCellΔ HYBRId® powered 104,863 ton (112,050 ton loaded) stealth (CATOBAR) aircraft carrier at the very least . . . unit cost €6.3 Bn - €8.5 Bn approx including a 30 year dedicated after sales & MRO support by OEM on-site . . . the two B.B. Patel class i-SMARTFuelCellΔ HYBRId® powered 104,863 ton (112,050 ton loaded) stealth (CATOBAR) aircraft carrier will be designed & built by a reputed foreign naval shipbuilder like Naval Group & Lockheed Martin Naval Systems etc . . . but iske propulsion Indian hoga (100% indigenous) aur saath mein AESA radar & weapons system bhi Indian made hoga . . . isse both private investors & navy will save a solid €1.0 Bn - €1.2 Bn in acquisition costs . . .
Can ins vikrant be resigned to have catobar and nuclear energy compatible... Then problem can be solved!!
bharat ko 4 se 5 carreer ki jarurat hai jisme 4 running me 1 maintenance me ho. submarine 60 se 65 tak ho jisme 51 neuclear honi chahiye. frigate, distroyer, minesweeper, underwater drone kisankhya adhik matrame ho, quality maintain ho. ships aur submarine rescue vessels ki sankhya bhi jarurat ke mutabik honi chahiye taki har jawan ki jivanko khatre se turant bahar nikala ja sake bina der ke.
Better to build more submarines