India has every reason to be proud of this accomplishment. Military technology takes a lot of time, talent, and resources to develop. Especially if you're not willing to steal it like some of India's neighbors in the region do.
For a country to be successful on the seas, it needs to have at least two aircraft carriers. Because in case one is sunk, the planes will have the other one to land on. As an Armenian proud to see India turing into a technological jagernout with slow but very steady steps. Much love from Armenia.
India actually at max needs 7 aircraft carriers, 2/3 on either side of Arabian sea and Bay of bengal, 1 in the andaman & nicobar islands and 1 in maintenance. Considering INS Vikramaditya wont operate in the navy past 15 years from now, 1 is in construction right now named, INS Vishal and would be in service by 2030. By 2047 India should have at leastin total 5 carriers with 2 of them being supercarriers and nuclear powered.
As a matter of fact, India has not maintained strong navies historically. Only South Indian empires like cholas had significant naval presence. In fact if India had a strong navy then Britishers could not have colonised it so easily.
@@tusharsharma8952 waise toh tjh jaise logo ko mjhe justify krne ki zarurat nai hai but still, as per Indian Navy "Indians took to the sea for trade and commerce rather than for political ends. Thus, the period up to about 16th century witnessed peaceful sea-borne commerce, cultural and traditional exchange between countries." Now if you know more than the Indian Navy then I have no idea what we can do about your delusion.
@@tusharsharma8952 Agar tune Indian history padhi hoti toh aise sawal krta hi nahi. And this is an objective information, don't try to see it through a "lens".
Indian Navy is soon going to reorder another Vikrant Class carrier. And also they are designing a 3rd Super-carrier with 65000+ displacement and EMALS Technology called INS Vishal (means Huge) to replace the Russian origin INS Vikramaditya. Indian Navy always wanted to use 3 carriers at a same time. One each for Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal and another in reserve.
@@TomW-ks3gp Kochi Shipyard Limited, the builder of Vikrant Class has told that they shall deliver the ship within 5 years of deal. And INS Vikrant is 76% indigenous and the 2nd ship shall have more indigenous content. Indian Navy will retire Russian Origin INS Vikramaditya within 15 years, so they already started designing of new 65000+ tons displacement Super Carrier.
@@TomW-ks3gpindia can built next carrier in 5-6 years ....but navy wants bigger (may be nuclear) and catapult carrier which will take time for redesigning...or india can take blue prints from uk...will is practical for time saving
@@durgeshsssthey already have taken the help UK France and USA are providing help to India in 65000 tonne carrier USA has decided to sell the EMALS technology and UK media has reported that India has bought blueprints for Elizabeth class carriers
@@ashrithrao06Anna ignore him he is either a Porki or their new found Father's,the bat munchers (golgappe eating wumao's courtesy of 16 Bihar Regiment)!! Vande Matram
India should return to the seas Look we used to control one of the wealthiest empires when navies of chola Empire were kings of indian Ocean.. When we stopped that..we became weaker and wealer Our strength should be retained from the seas..not just land routes
Thanks to our current Govt. for this. They gave the utmost priority to the Make in India initiative and expedited every process related to it. Kudos to the govt 👍
Yar tum log na kuch bhi. Pura gyan lia karo.. 2005 se bn rha h. First tha islye time lga. Second will take 6 Years because r&d is already done and infrastructure is ready. Tejas ka First version b pehle bn gya tha..arihant bhi. Chndrayan 1 bhi. Mars mission bhi. Arjun tNk bhi agni prithvi brahmos etc also We were going to purchase 126 aircrafts in 2014 which this government delayed and we got only 36. Gap between India and china keep increasing. Now after 10 years we need much more. After china captured Indian land in Ladakh and russia attacked ukriane government rose from slumber, and realised war won't wait for their model. They realised every interest is safe if country is safe. So last 1 year or so government doing fine job, because now they realise its urgent.
I read from other sources that this ship is basically the integration of many different parts from different countries. The last time this ship showed off itself without fighter planes on deck. What use an aircraft carrier has with no aircraft?
Same vikrant class with small modifications is under consideration already Indian navy sent proposal to Indian cabinet 😊 So that means India will have three operational aircraft carriers by 2030
I feel India's 4th and 5th,6th Carriers should be named after greatest martime emperors of bharat. INS RAJENDRA CHOLA INS RAJA RAJA INS CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI
I think it is deliberate that they are not named after them. It is safer to name land based Navy bases after Emperors. Especially, Emperors that are closer to people's hearts i.e. whom they have an emotional connect with.
It may not be the most powerful but we are proud of the fact that it was made in our country and now we have the technology to make aircraft carriers. Similarly, a country can develop well by not being dependent on others but by developing them on its own. Making things and learning. We may not get success in the beginning but if we do it again and again we will definitely get it. We are proud that our country is moving towards self-reliant India day by day.❤️🇮🇳
I only have a few dollars to bet with. But I will put my money on an Indian-made aircraft carrier than a Chinese-built aircraft carrier. Filipino-American watching in Virginia, USA.
The Indian Indus valley civilization had shipbuilding and ports which were used to trade with Mesopotamians and Egyptians. Then the Gupta Empire and Roman Empire trade thrived flooding Indian coffers with Roman gold in exchange for Indian silk and Wootz steel. The chola empire conquered a lot of southeast Asia with the use of their robust navy and finally great Maratha King Shivaji revived the Indian naval glory by establishing a navy that challenged Europeans in the Arabian sea. India has a rich shipbuilding and naval history. So this is just the start of a lethal Indian Navy.
@@GehraRajyaKaAnmolTattu *South East Asia ... and you're right that it was not conquered by force. The King's merely went on trade expeditions and eventually settled and the Empire expanded amicably. South East Asia acknowledges the Indian cultural heritage it has.
Gupta was 400-600AD, Western Rome Ended in 400AD. NOT to mention, Indian did not have the know how to produce refined silk until it was brought in form China during Gupta. What a butt load of fantasy.
@@mottscottison6943 Roman Empire ended in the 5th century 🤡🤡🤡 Also, it doesn't matter where the silk was found first, what matters is who produced export quality silk.
@@mottscottison6943 Also, indus vally coins and artefacts have been found in Mesopotamia and Egypt, along with port cities like Lothal in indus valley civilization. Try harder.
Putting all those VLS tubes on a carrier is a waste of resources, compromises space on the ship, and is less effective at protecting the carrier. There is a reason the American and Chinese carriers carry zero missiles. Instead they carry and launch AEW aircraft, which will search out possible threats, and then all your escort guided missile frigate/destroyer/cruisers will use THEIR missiles to destroy the threat long before it gets close to the carrier itself. The carrier just needs the best CIWS system available as a last line of defense against a stray missile that might get through. Instead the Vikrant is carrying its OWN air defense missiles, has a near obsolete CIWS setup, and on top of that, which ever foreign company that manufactured the cannon managed to con the Indian navy into installing them onto the carrier as well. GUNS???? What are you supposed to do with guns on an aircraft carrier in this modern age. Even WWII era carriers didn't sport cannons!
@@Sinner85 US and Chinese carriers do not use VLS medium range missiles, because that's what their destroyer escorts are for. What they DO USE are two things: short range anti-air missiles (such as the ESSM) in trainable HORIZONTAL launchers suited for close in defense, as well as the highest quality CIWS they have, as last line of defense against any supersonic missiles that have gotten through all other layers of defense. What does the Vikrant carry? 1. 32 cell VLS which either carry Barak 8 for medium range air defense (which the destroyers should be doing from far away) or Barak 1 short range air defense. Except vertically launched short range air defense will not give you good enough reaction time compared with trainable launcher like the US and Chinese use. 2. 4 AK-630 CIWS units, which are some of the most antiquated CIWS systems in the world, and is considered only adequate to defend against subsonic threats. India does not make its own CIWS AFAIK. 3. Most bizarrely, 4 OTO Melara 76 mm guns. Essentially a 76 mm flak cannon, and it is even worse than the AK-630 and won't be able to intercept any type of modern anti-ship missile, but the Italian consultants hired by the Indian Navy somehow conned them into buying FOUR of these babies for their brand new aircraft carrier!
No mention of the Indian Combat Management System CMS-71 that has Cooperative Engagement Capability which only a select few Navies in the world possess.
@@ion8264 What is Cooperative Engagement Capability? Alright, say that you have one Indian frigate acting as a screen 30 km out on the flank from the main Indian aircraft carrier fleet that has a couple of destroyers escorting a carrier and a support ship. And this frigate screen detects an incoming threat of around a 100 anti-ship missiles that pop up on the radar due to their hi-hi-lo flight profile, hurtling towards the main carrier fleet. Now the frigate alone can hope to intercept at max 32 anti-ship missiles before they get in range of the carrier fleet and when they get close to the carrier, interception would become much more difficult because by then the anti-ship missiles will start flying a sea-skimming profile, making it harder for the S-band radars to detect until they are very close. Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) allows this one frigate to intercept all 100 anti-ship missiles before they get close to the carrier. How? Because it slaves the VLS in the both the destroyers and the carrier to the frigate's combat management system. So when the frigate detects the incoming 100 anti-ship missiles, it fires all of its own SAM missiles as well as half the missiles of the main fleet at the incoming threat. Without CEC, the main fleet would have to wait for the threat to appear on its own radars before being able to fire its own missiles by which time it'd be too late. If it was a Royal Navy carrier fleet instead, it would be toast because Royal Navy doesn't have CEC yet. In near future, Navy will extend this capability to allow even fighter jets from Indian carriers and drones to do the job that the frigate did in the above scenario.
@@ion8264 basically multiple vessels/aircrafts operate together using software systems to efficiently take out targets or perform surveillance, as the case may be.
The fact that we can make air craft carriers even though we have to import some parts ( its understandable that not every component can be indigenous), the capability of making it on our own is remarkable and great.
Dude no country in the world can build an aircraft carrier with 100% it's own resources, hence Indigenously US made/Indian Made/France made aircraft Carriers, all have components imported from outside
When British first saw Indian naval vessels & engineering they immediately felt threat to their own industries and decided to finish Indian manufacturing to secure their own. Like a parasite they drained India to their max capacity but the nerves and neurons and the soul... remains.
@@Mrcoops85Lol Britain isn't even the powerhouse of Europe anymore. We have great relations with the French and Germans who run the show. 👍 We'll slowly progress. Keep insulting.
@@Mrcoops85 Keep crying, greatness can't be achieved in one day but with time and effort it can be achieved we are better than Brits in the space sector and the second domain will be the defence wait for next ten to 15 years
Indians, please stop talking about China all the time or linking China with India. The Chinese have never cared about India. There is nothing related to India in Chinese life.
Indians, please stop talking about China all the time or linking China with India. The Chinese have never cared about India. There is nothing related to India in Chinese life. India doesn't even have the ability to plagiarize, so what right does it have to say that its neighboring countries are plagiarizing?
A country like ours which is surrounded by water from 3 sides its important to have have atleast 6 of these kind of Aircraft carriers. Considering the threat from all sides India has finally realised the importance of protecting its seas.
Not being nuclear and having a ski jump limits it. But it depends on their purpose for it. For global missions it would be limited because of refueling and aircraft having less payload and burning more fuel. But for protecting their local interests it works just fine.
Vikrant costs 4 Bil$. A same sized CATOBAR design and Nuke powered would cost no less than 8 Bil$, and a longer build time. India needs multiple Carriers in short duration. So if i have 8 Bil$, i would go for 2 Vikrant Class Carriers, than 1 INS Vishal (The nuke powered CATOBAR Carrier planned by the Indian Navy).
@@n3v3rforgott3n9 But can 1 CATOBAR Carrier be at 2 places at once? India needs atleast 2 Carriers in theory, one for the Western Seaboard against Pakistan and one for the Eastern Sea board against China. Apart from theory, in practical, it needs 3 Carriers, because usually at any given time, there will be 1 Carrier undergoing repairs/maintenance while 2 Carriers are operational.
@@rohitb5834 You will be having half or even less of the capabilities of a CATOBAR carrier. Frankly the distance it not so massive you need a carrier on both sides at all times. 1 Carrier being able to strike twice as many targets and put up its own EWACs and refueling aircraft is massive to help India control the Straights of Malacca which is the biggest strategical objective in the region. Will India have the planes, trained crew, and support vessels do man 2 or even 3 carrier strike groups in any short order.
@@n3v3rforgott3n9 Distance isnt massive? The distance is 2100 nm , or a 5-day sailing period from the Eastern to the Western seaboard or Vica versa. 5 days is a lot in war. India does not need a Carrier to control the Straits of Malacca. It has the Andaman and Nicobar Islands right at the entrance of the Malaccan strait. Having islands there with military bases and large airfields act like an "unsinkable aircraft carrier". India can completely block the straits there within a matter of hours if the need be, even today. I think the area where India needs it Carrier fleet is the Sunda Strait, between Java and Sumatra, lower down the world map. Thats another Strait where the Chinese fleet can enter the IOR. India will need a whole massive Carrier Battle Group there to block that strait in case of a war. Yes, India will have the planes, trained crew and support vessels for 3 Carrier Battle Groups by the early 2030s when the 3rd carrier enters service. Right now, it has 2 active Carrier Battle Groups. And i agree with the CATOBAR benefits, but before venturing into that, India needs to quickly cover its basic interests in the near future.
I'm Chinese. No Chinese people in China see India as an enemy. Because India is not qualified to become a competitor to China. We Chinese people despise India and the Indian army.
@@yashkumar3196 I hope Indians read carefully and experience with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India determines the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of both countries and you will understand. India was colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, with its strength greatly reduced and its position replaced by the United States. India took the opportunity to achieve independence through a "non violent and non cooperative" approach. In other words, India's independence has not experienced the test of blood and fire, so an independent country lacks cohesion and willpower, as well as a sense of national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since the British defeated the corrupt and incompetent Qing government in 1840, the Chinese people have been living in a state of deep suffering. Various disasters and wars followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, suffering various humiliations. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan becoming a Japanese colony, the Eight Nation Alliance burning the Old Summer Palace, and the subsequent comprehensive and brutal invasion of China by Japan. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion of China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese military and civilians rose up to resist, fought in bloody battles for fourteen years, and suffered 30 million casualties, ultimately achieving victory. Do you know why there are so many casualties in China? There are hundreds of reasons, and I will only give an example to illustrate one of them: Chinese troops are in conflict with the Japanese army. Often, if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war is 100, they only have 20 to 30 firearms. The remaining soldiers did not give up resistance or surrender. They bravely fought against the Japanese machine guns and cannons with machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks until they sacrificed. This spirit of returning to death and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties because India's knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance. Do you know why there was the "Nanjing Massacre"? Because of the desperate resistance of the Chinese military and civilians, they will never surrender or give up. After Japan broke through Nanjing, it was first to vent its anger and secondly to scare off other Chinese soldiers and civilians who were resisting. However, the "Nanjing Massacre" not only did not deter any Chinese people, but also further stirred up the resistance of the Chinese people. The establishment of New China has gone through the test of blood and fire. Do you know why the Chinese national flag is red? That's because the establishment of New China was bought with the blood of countless Chinese ancestors, and we Chinese people will always remember it. From 1945 to 1949, during the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a peaceful life they had long longed for, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out, lasting three years. The Chinese Volunteer Army successfully resisted the US northward route without air or sea control, outdated military equipment, and extremely poor logistics, at the cost of losing hundreds of thousands of brave PLA soldiers. As for the 1962 Sino Indian War, which India never forgets and feels extremely humiliated, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. Firstly, it only took 32 days. Secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years after its founding, during which many people starved to death. In 1962, India's economy far surpassed that of China. The United States, Soviet Union, and Britain both support India. At that time, India implemented a "forward policy" and used elite troops to attack China. We Chinese people really don't want to go to war. The Chinese troops who joined the war with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense forces, not regular People's Liberation Army. In China, military personnel are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and military personnel are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the border of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not yield, resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it is a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than yielding is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess. So, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand tall in the world like China? Absolutely impossible.
Hahaha, such a useless broken ship, how could you see its strength? Even when driving normally, the bow of the ship has to fluctuate up and down. How to make the plane take off and land
🕉 Satyameva Jayate: Truth and Honesty and Reality gets created when Good Thoughts, Good Deeds, Good Acts are allowed to achieve the small steps needed for the correct choices and correct decisions to be made. Satyameva Jayate
This is an accomplishment. But, it means little until India has enough carriers to keep one or two deployed all the time. Also, IMO, India needs to have a CATOBAR true carrier. Catapult launched planes can carry more weapons and more fuel, increasing their lethality.
@@sohanelavarthy5397 India's economy is growing. Firms are moving out of China, and many will go to India. I expect India to become a true regional power with a powerful army, navy, and air force. Not there yet, but pretty far along, IMO.
@@craigkdillon There was a huge debate- spend more on Carriers or Nuclear submarines? INS Vishal, a 65,000 tons CATOBAR EMALS design was proposed as India's 3rd Active Carrier, along with a fleet of 9 additional Nuclear Submarines. Offcourse both couldn go together, budget constraints. So finally, the Indian Navy decided to tone it down to a 45,000 tons STOBAR, similar to the above INS Vikrant, as its 3rd Carrier, and most likely proceed with the 9 Nuclear Submarines over the next 15 years. INS Vishal will be taken up in the late 2020s to replace India's INS Vikramaditya .
@@craigkdillonalso another point, India is the 4th most powerful military on the planet, and 4th or 5th most powerful Navy. Its also in a status of a "Potential Superpower", and is the world's 3rd largest naval shipbuilder in terms of number of Naval ships under construction at the moment. So im pretty sure it has already passed the status of a "Regional power" as of 2023.
It is a proud moment but catapult should have been fitted as it allows aircraft to take more ordenances and a bigger aircraft carrier which could carry Awacs like the American aircraft carriers. Raffles for the aircraft carrier instead of Mig aircraft.
I think India may be planning to move straight to vertical take off and landing aircraft which will not require the catapult system at all. My understanding is that Rafale-M have recently been decided for the carriers. I don’t think India plans on following/copying American equipment. I think India is now looking few steps ahead and/or fully ingenious defence equipment. We would have to if we don’t want to be CONSTANTLY trailing behind other powers and if we want to break the cycle. Also, American and Chinese are invading/offensive forces while India is a defensive force. The requirements are not the same and frankly neither is the budget.
The reason India is not a global superpower is because India does not project it's military power in other areas of the world, INS Vikrant is diesel powered and can not operate far from refuelling port or friendly ports hence India only uses it in the Indian ocean near to home port. However, India does not create nuclear aircraft carriers as it has no interest in taking it's military power far from home. India still remains a nation that has never attacked or invaded another country and has always defended itself during war.
India's Aircraft Carriers, Destroyers, Frigates has operational ranges of 8000 kms - 10,000 kms + and can sail for 45 days+, India has 4 large replenishment ships that can double the range and endurance as well as overseas ports for refueling. However with the China and Pakistan threat, 70% of the fleet has to remain in the Indian Ocean Region. But the Indian Navy often deploys smaller fleets to the South China Sea, East China Sea and Western Mediterranean showing its Blue water capabilities.
@AkarshShukla-fn9ou @AkarshShukla-fn9ou Yes missiles and coastline length are not related. But you sure need to polish your basic knowledge of English. Read the comment for which my response was made. The point by @diksh777 was about ship range not missile range. Better luck next time
India has an experience of operating Aircraft Carriers for more than 5 decades, something China will never be able to catch-up with considering they've started operating AC's as well now.
Indian typtical logic is like this: In 2005, China GDP is 3 trillion , In 2022 India GDP is 3 trillion, so it means India is just 18 yrs behind China. so In 1980 Bill gates has 100 dollars in his bank account, in 2023 i have 100 dollars in my pocket, so Bill gate is just 43 yrs ahead me , after 43 years , i will be the next Bill gates?
@@_KRONET_108 Type 002 last drill 600 times take off & landed. This time just happening now close to 600 and increasing in South China Sea according to the Japanese news.Can Indian AC do that.There are no match between India and China.
@@northatlanticterroristorga1222Ur mentioning INS Vikramaditya. Actually two more are coming. One is a replica of INS Vikrant and another larger one after that to replace the purchased from Russia, INS Vikramaditya.
Not really something you'd see talked about on an engineering channel. Explaining why Pakistan is damn near a failed state is best left to geopolitics channels.
yeah by head nodding, Indians becme the richest ethnic group in the USA & UK. - CEOs of global 500 companies. - founders of highest unicorn companies in the US , of foreign birth. right in front of your rac-sit face....& there is nothing u can do about it. would love to see your reaction when Vivek Ramaswamy becomes US president.
@@岩兔at anytime India can become like china if we showed so much blind faith and sympathy towards one political party and in alcoholic state approved them to became communist, establish one party rule in happiest state.
@@martinluther4720 so what. Do you find it proud that india going to foreign and adoption citizenship of America. Do you think it is matter of proud? And stop doing shit
Yeahhh, along with the entire Pakistan in the next 30 minutes...Dude, to get a carrier, you have to breach at least 5 layers of Air defence systems...that's not an easy task for a country like Pakistan.
@@eladphawa7301 All imported parts, and Italy design, Italy only can design mini AC, this is why India Ac is mini version. that is India type indigenious😅
Can we just be objective? Its not the most advamced by any means. Its capabilities just shouldn't be hyped as world class. But it is a great achievement in terms of learning experience and indigenous effort. All narions have to start somewhere. That shouldn't be belittled.
1 - No catapult (has a ski jump that cheap and technologically backward carriers use) 2 - No decent aircraft for the carrier (MIG-29s are literally one of the worst aircraft in the world) 3 - Not nuclear powered 4 - Zero supporting infrastructure around it (supply tankers, support ships) 5 - India has been operating aircraft carriers since the 1960s (I remember reading about the original Vikrant being inducted into the navy 52 years ago) 6 - Meanwhile China just started operating aircraft carriers 10 years ago and has left India waaaaaaaaaaaaay behind. *Stop patting yourselves on the back, roll up your sleeves and actually compete with China!*
18 years it's to long to make a indigenous carrier...this should be 5 years maximum... India need 4 more aircraft carriers..to back up... enemy's are increasing no one can trust need to self sufficient..
@@marcd5196designing started in 2005. But cus it was the first time india has build anything by themselves, they had to figure out everything from scratch. Next one will take 5 years.
@cjjk9142policies and interests change over time. Anyway in short run India would have 3 Carriers. Maybe it would go upto 5-6 in the long run, say 2050.
We already have around 80mw of nuclear rectors for submarine's. And currently working on the development of 190mw nuclear reactors. So possibly when we start to build 65k ton carrier possible we able Power it by nuclear power. Currently we have properly working Kaveri Marine gas turbine engein that have enough power to run 2500 to 3000 ton class ships. And nave already have plains for it. I just hope government start the development of more powerful marine gas turbine engein. On bases of kaveri Marine gas turbine engein for the future navy ships and submarine's.
The wakes trail on both port and starboard sides are like giant protruding teeth of mechanical saw. Wobbling up and down unsteadily like a wild YoYo.😂😂
@@chinazieswillstartww3253 lol first look at how many foreign technologies used I your boat before talking. Then my country happens to be one of the countries can indigenously build aircraft carriers with EMALS
Great, due to its vast ocean cover and also to maintain equal power as per our neighbours, India need two more such carriers. Of course, it is epensive to manage but due to the magnanimous size of our shore and also two critical and sensitive islets on east and west, we had to induct two more to safe guard our watery borders.
There’s a reason India had to add so many weapons to this carrier. It has terrible radars. It takes forever to launch and land an aircraft. US carriers can launch 30+ jets in less than 45 minutes. It would take 45 minutes just for the Vikrant to launch a single jet. Plus all of the weapons and aircraft are from other countries. What a joke
@@Austin-cx2xe "joke"? Say that to almost all NATO allies, who are solely dependent on the US. Even economically mighty Japan, South Korea, etc rely on US. Atleast Bharat (India) has indigenous manufacturing capabilities. And BTW, INS Vikrant carries indigenous Tejas aircraft too.
@@_Mohit_Joshiyour carrier is just a christmas tree of foreign tech & components. your Tejas is useless. you need Rafales but your government is still haggling over the price. real joke haha
a few years back there was some problems with supply of spares for the Mig29K, and hence the operational levels were low. However , its much better since 2021. Currently, 21 Mig29K and 12 Helicopters serve on the Vikrant.
@franktoh3041 yes your family checked them out...they were so pissed off we built a carrier all by ourselves that they had to shit out their anger 😂😂😂
The five permanent members of the United Nations were established through military strength. The Republic of China is a victorious country in World War II and is eligible to enter. The People's Republic of China relied on the Korean War to enter the five permanent members of the United Nations.
Everything is relative, the narrator should compare this to a US supercarrier. It would makenthis Vikrannt look like a toy. Also many of the conponents of the Vikrant sre sourced-not home made, butni guess you gotta start from somewhere.
It's indigenously built . Next one will compete with the best . As far as rankings go indian military is ranked number fourth in the world . As india grows economically so will its military .
@Akarsh2008 The US Navy has had experience building carriers since the 1940s. We're just getting started. It'll take time, but with help we'll catch up in the next 2 decades.
⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out!
*SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE
Meeting the aircraft carrier kowtowing for the first time
Go India. Stay strong my brothers. Filipino here.
Love from India 😊
Support to India & Philippines!
@@stockholm1960where are you from?
@@singhrajput6949 Stockholm. I love India 🙂💚🤍🧡 (not pakistan or Russia)
@@stockholm1960 why do you hate Pakistan🇵🇰 and 🇷🇺?
Support india from Philippines 🇵🇭
@Qwerty01012 both countries has a one problem china
Love you too bruh❤
Both are Poor country 😢
@@isleephungryIndia is not a poor country it was mad poor now India is 5th largest and fastest growing economy in the world
@@RudraiyaEven India has good economy, it will never change the fact that India is one of most dirtiest countries in the world. Lmao “Indian food agh”
India has every reason to be proud of this accomplishment. Military technology takes a lot of time, talent, and resources to develop. Especially if you're not willing to steal it like some of India's neighbors in the region do.
Shots fired at me??😂
@@Xinnie_The_Flu🤣
@@Xinnie_The_Flu-1000 Social Credit. Your family going to camp now 👍🏽
@@BasedTruthSeeker nice name. #PKMKBForever
@@Xinnie_The_Flu Only the reality #LongLivePKMKB
For a country to be successful on the seas, it needs to have at least two aircraft carriers. Because in case one is sunk, the planes will have the other one to land on. As an Armenian proud to see India turing into a technological jagernout with slow but very steady steps. Much love from Armenia.
India has 2 aircraft carriers...INS Vikrant this one and the older INS Vikramaditya
Third is under construction
India actually at max needs 7 aircraft carriers, 2/3 on either side of Arabian sea and Bay of bengal, 1 in the andaman & nicobar islands and 1 in maintenance. Considering INS Vikramaditya wont operate in the navy past 15 years from now, 1 is in construction right now named, INS Vishal and would be in service by 2030. By 2047 India should have at leastin total 5 carriers with 2 of them being supercarriers and nuclear powered.
@@pranayghosh4413 I guess officials know more than you
@@anonymous-zt9xw freedom of speech my friend. It was just an opinion though
Navies used to be a thing of great importance in ancient Indian empires, time to go back.
Time to go back is wrong sentence
'Bring that time back' is correct
As a matter of fact, India has not maintained strong navies historically. Only South Indian empires like cholas had significant naval presence.
In fact if India had a strong navy then Britishers could not have colonised it so easily.
@@puneet90 source? kahan se quote kar raha hai ki gujrat ports me navy nahi thi? fact hai to quote kar?
@@tusharsharma8952 waise toh tjh jaise logo ko mjhe justify krne ki zarurat nai hai but still, as per Indian Navy "Indians took to the sea for trade and commerce rather than for political ends. Thus, the period up to about 16th century witnessed peaceful sea-borne commerce, cultural and traditional exchange between countries."
Now if you know more than the Indian Navy then I have no idea what we can do about your delusion.
@@tusharsharma8952 Agar tune Indian history padhi hoti toh aise sawal krta hi nahi. And this is an objective information, don't try to see it through a "lens".
Indian Navy is soon going to reorder another Vikrant Class carrier. And also they are designing a 3rd Super-carrier with 65000+ displacement and EMALS Technology called INS Vishal (means Huge) to replace the Russian origin INS Vikramaditya. Indian Navy always wanted to use 3 carriers at a same time. One each for Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal and another in reserve.
Indian “soon” means 20+ years. And the core parts will be all from other countries. Lol
@@TomW-ks3gp Kochi Shipyard Limited, the builder of Vikrant Class has told that they shall deliver the ship within 5 years of deal. And INS Vikrant is 76% indigenous and the 2nd ship shall have more indigenous content. Indian Navy will retire Russian Origin INS Vikramaditya within 15 years, so they already started designing of new 65000+ tons displacement Super Carrier.
@@TomW-ks3gpindia can built next carrier in 5-6 years ....but navy wants bigger (may be nuclear) and catapult carrier which will take time for redesigning...or india can take blue prints from uk...will is practical for time saving
@@durgeshsssthey already have taken the help
UK France and USA are providing help to India in 65000 tonne carrier
USA has decided to sell the EMALS technology and UK media has reported that India has bought blueprints for Elizabeth class carriers
@@ashrithrao06Anna ignore him he is either a Porki or their new found Father's,the bat munchers (golgappe eating wumao's courtesy of 16 Bihar Regiment)!!
Vande Matram
India should return to the seas
Look we used to control one of the wealthiest empires when navies of chola Empire were kings of indian Ocean..
When we stopped that..we became weaker and wealer
Our strength should be retained from the seas..not just land routes
Better not to be proud of mythological past that has been exaggerated 😂😂
@@Peter-jo6yuhistorical chola control 2100 year indian ocean
History isnt mythology A hole
@@Peter-jo6yulaughing without any reason is a sign of Lunacy and don't cry and apply burnol in your ❤️🔥
@@Peter-jo6yuilleducated
Thanks to our current Govt. for this. They gave the utmost priority to the Make in India initiative and expedited every process related to it. Kudos to the govt 👍
Yar tum log na kuch bhi. Pura gyan lia karo.. 2005 se bn rha h. First tha islye time lga. Second will take 6 Years because r&d is already done and infrastructure is ready. Tejas ka First version b pehle bn gya tha..arihant bhi. Chndrayan 1 bhi. Mars mission bhi. Arjun tNk bhi agni prithvi brahmos etc also
We were going to purchase 126 aircrafts in 2014 which this government delayed and we got only 36. Gap between India and china keep increasing. Now after 10 years we need much more.
After china captured Indian land in Ladakh and russia attacked ukriane government rose from slumber, and realised war won't wait for their model. They realised every interest is safe if country is safe. So last 1 year or so government doing fine job, because now they realise its urgent.
Tell your gov to build toilets and feed the hungry first
@@kimchiba4570 jealous much?
I read from other sources that this ship is basically the integration of many different parts from different countries. The last time this ship showed off itself without fighter planes on deck. What use an aircraft carrier has with no aircraft?
Be wise bro! Don't mix government and politics with our Defense, our India
Same vikrant class with small modifications is under consideration already Indian navy sent proposal to Indian cabinet 😊
So that means India will have three operational aircraft carriers by 2030
Vikramaditya might end her terms of service by then ngl
Same type ka nahi banana chahiye.
Next Carrier, Nuclear Powerd banana chahiye and not desiel Powerd.
no 4, another 1 is being made, unless our Navy retires Vikramaditya
I think we got 4 now idk
INS Vikrant is powerful than all USA carrier. !
We pakistanis are also trying to make indigenous 70 cc bike
Lage raho munna bhai
@@faizansiddique572🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭
@@Anirbannandi2001 sahi to baat hai na
@@faizansiddique572 Aap kon se desh se ho?
@@Anirbannandi2001 India
This ship has 4 Multirole Melara cannons, 32 VLS for SAM missiles like Barak 8 & Barak 8-ER
That's better defended than even the USN fat nuclear carriers.
@@nuclear-strategic256 fat vs tiny
Congtats India
INS Vikrant is powerful than all USA carrier. !
no bro
Impressive, congratulations India.
I feel India's 4th and 5th,6th Carriers should be named after greatest martime emperors of bharat.
INS RAJENDRA CHOLA
INS RAJA RAJA
INS CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI
👍👍
@@KS-op9bb
PNS Donkey
@@KS-op9bb
PNS donkey
@@KS-op9bb INS hater
I think it is deliberate that they are not named after them. It is safer to name land based Navy bases after Emperors. Especially, Emperors that are closer to people's hearts i.e. whom they have an emotional connect with.
Seriously Congratulations to India ❤
It may not be the most powerful but we are proud of the fact that it was made in our country and now we have the technology to make aircraft carriers. Similarly, a country can develop well by not being dependent on others but by developing them on its own. Making things and learning. We may not get success in the beginning but if we do it again and again we will definitely get it. We are proud that our country is moving towards self-reliant India day by day.❤️🇮🇳
I only have a few dollars to bet with. But I will put my money on an Indian-made aircraft carrier than a Chinese-built aircraft carrier. Filipino-American watching in Virginia, USA.
Thank you so much for your trust and support🙏
Love from 🇮🇳
can i bet against you?
😂good luck
You loosed😢@@fatdoi003
I can tell why you only have a few dollars.
Support to India 💚🤍💛 & Philippines! ❤💙🤍
The Indian Indus valley civilization had shipbuilding and ports which were used to trade with Mesopotamians and Egyptians. Then the Gupta Empire and Roman Empire trade thrived flooding Indian coffers with Roman gold in exchange for Indian silk and Wootz steel. The chola empire conquered a lot of southeast Asia with the use of their robust navy and finally great Maratha King Shivaji revived the Indian naval glory by establishing a navy that challenged Europeans in the Arabian sea. India has a rich shipbuilding and naval history. So this is just the start of a lethal Indian Navy.
Don’t think south East Asia was conquered with force. Or even conquered in the first place.
@@GehraRajyaKaAnmolTattu *South East Asia ... and you're right that it was not conquered by force. The King's merely went on trade expeditions and eventually settled and the Empire expanded amicably. South East Asia acknowledges the Indian cultural heritage it has.
Gupta was 400-600AD, Western Rome Ended in 400AD. NOT to mention, Indian did not have the know how to produce refined silk until it was brought in form China during Gupta. What a butt load of fantasy.
@@mottscottison6943 Roman Empire ended in the 5th century 🤡🤡🤡 Also, it doesn't matter where the silk was found first, what matters is who produced export quality silk.
@@mottscottison6943 Also, indus vally coins and artefacts have been found in Mesopotamia and Egypt, along with port cities like Lothal in indus valley civilization. Try harder.
it will be interesting if you feature Brahmos missile system.
Brahmos anti-ship is already use in our kolkata class destroyer and talwar class frigate
Vikranth has BrahMos missiles 😉
Putting all those VLS tubes on a carrier is a waste of resources, compromises space on the ship, and is less effective at protecting the carrier. There is a reason the American and Chinese carriers carry zero missiles. Instead they carry and launch AEW aircraft, which will search out possible threats, and then all your escort guided missile frigate/destroyer/cruisers will use THEIR missiles to destroy the threat long before it gets close to the carrier itself. The carrier just needs the best CIWS system available as a last line of defense against a stray missile that might get through.
Instead the Vikrant is carrying its OWN air defense missiles, has a near obsolete CIWS setup, and on top of that, which ever foreign company that manufactured the cannon managed to con the Indian navy into installing them onto the carrier as well. GUNS???? What are you supposed to do with guns on an aircraft carrier in this modern age. Even WWII era carriers didn't sport cannons!
@@tren133those guns are ciws pal.. even us carriers carry essam and ciws
@@Sinner85 US and Chinese carriers do not use VLS medium range missiles, because that's what their destroyer escorts are for. What they DO USE are two things: short range anti-air missiles (such as the ESSM) in trainable HORIZONTAL launchers suited for close in defense, as well as the highest quality CIWS they have, as last line of defense against any supersonic missiles that have gotten through all other layers of defense.
What does the Vikrant carry?
1. 32 cell VLS which either carry Barak 8 for medium range air defense (which the destroyers should be doing from far away) or Barak 1 short range air defense. Except vertically launched short range air defense will not give you good enough reaction time compared with trainable launcher like the US and Chinese use.
2. 4 AK-630 CIWS units, which are some of the most antiquated CIWS systems in the world, and is considered only adequate to defend against subsonic threats. India does not make its own CIWS AFAIK.
3. Most bizarrely, 4 OTO Melara 76 mm guns. Essentially a 76 mm flak cannon, and it is even worse than the AK-630 and won't be able to intercept any type of modern anti-ship missile, but the Italian consultants hired by the Indian Navy somehow conned them into buying FOUR of these babies for their brand new aircraft carrier!
We support india from Philippines 💪🇵🇭🇮🇳
❤ 🇵🇭
Philippines 💝
With what support? By shouting?
Filipinos will give bananas to Indians 🤣
No mention of the Indian Combat Management System CMS-71 that has Cooperative Engagement Capability which only a select few Navies in the world possess.
what is that?
@@ion8264 What is Cooperative Engagement Capability? Alright, say that you have one Indian frigate acting as a screen 30 km out on the flank from the main Indian aircraft carrier fleet that has a couple of destroyers escorting a carrier and a support ship. And this frigate screen detects an incoming threat of around a 100 anti-ship missiles that pop up on the radar due to their hi-hi-lo flight profile, hurtling towards the main carrier fleet. Now the frigate alone can hope to intercept at max 32 anti-ship missiles before they get in range of the carrier fleet and when they get close to the carrier, interception would become much more difficult because by then the anti-ship missiles will start flying a sea-skimming profile, making it harder for the S-band radars to detect until they are very close.
Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) allows this one frigate to intercept all 100 anti-ship missiles before they get close to the carrier. How? Because it slaves the VLS in the both the destroyers and the carrier to the frigate's combat management system. So when the frigate detects the incoming 100 anti-ship missiles, it fires all of its own SAM missiles as well as half the missiles of the main fleet at the incoming threat. Without CEC, the main fleet would have to wait for the threat to appear on its own radars before being able to fire its own missiles by which time it'd be too late.
If it was a Royal Navy carrier fleet instead, it would be toast because Royal Navy doesn't have CEC yet.
In near future, Navy will extend this capability to allow even fighter jets from Indian carriers and drones to do the job that the frigate did in the above scenario.
@@ion8264 basically multiple vessels/aircrafts operate together using software systems to efficiently take out targets or perform surveillance, as the case may be.
Salute to the makers & hard workers! 🫡🇮🇳
India 🇮🇳 ❤🔥
The fact that we can make air craft carriers even though we have to import some parts ( its understandable that not every component can be indigenous), the capability of making it on our own is remarkable and great.
Dude no country in the world can build an aircraft carrier with 100% it's own resources, hence Indigenously US made/Indian Made/France made aircraft Carriers, all have components imported from outside
@@Devastating-queen-destroyrKing that's what I said and I appreciate India's increasing capabilities.
congratz India. great achievement respect from Pakistan
Thanks from india❤. Hope we became supportive partners in future ✌
When u don't know its for u 😂😂
@@YessEthan we have CM-400AKG missiles to naturalie the threat of Aircraft carrier. i just appreciated india to build this carrier at home.
Pakistani kab sudhroge tumlog😂
@@ahsanfarooq55 INS vikrant Range 15 thousand
Pakistan Shaheen 3 small made in China maximum Range 2750
😭😭🙏
Very impressive, with a powerful swing as it moves across calm seas. 0:01
这样，它搭载的飞机就可以原地起飞了。
that's an animated video clip
Just the look of this mighty warship is enough to make any potential adversary trembles with fear
😂😂
@@kinte1870you Pakistani can laugh in your wooden boats 😂 and laughing without any reason is a sign of Lunacy
so funny
The Gerald R Ford would like a word
@@GrindingMidnight just like how USS Enterprise fleed in the sight of Russian made submarines in 1971 Bangladesh Liberation war 😂😂
I N S VIKRANT 🥰
When British first saw Indian naval vessels & engineering they immediately felt threat to their own industries and decided to finish Indian manufacturing to secure their own. Like a parasite they drained India to their max capacity but the nerves and neurons and the soul... remains.
That Carrier is a turd mate. You’re not even included in the conversation when it comes to projecting power overseas.
@@Mrcoops85Lol Britain isn't even the powerhouse of Europe anymore. We have great relations with the French and Germans who run the show. 👍 We'll slowly progress. Keep insulting.
@@Mrcoops85 Keep crying, greatness can't be achieved in one day but with time and effort it can be achieved we are better than Brits in the space sector and the second domain will be the defence wait for next ten to 15 years
@@Mrcoops85Ungrateful Britain is a totally insignificant Isolated Small Island struck in its illusion past...
@@Mrcoops85 still better than aircraft carrier in uk which broke down
Chinese bots in comments 🤡
Not actually Chinese but pakistani representing them as Chinese 😂 son and father relationship 😂
Indians, please stop talking about China all the time or linking China with India. The Chinese have never cared about India. There is nothing related to India in Chinese life.
India will soon build 4 other aircraft carriers within 2 decades ❤
So many US Homeless are crying in comment section...
They are from NATO nations who can't build even basic ammunition and launch their own satellites. Showing how big their daddy is
They are pakistani imposters using fake names .not US peoples
The total population of US is equal to the total homeless people in India. Shut your mouth
Go India! Love from China
JAI HIND VIKRANt 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
India was able to send a moon rover without COPYING. Unlike it’s neighbor.
Powered by holy cow dung.
Indian products are buy off shelves and assembled.
Indians, please stop talking about China all the time or linking China with India. The Chinese have never cared about India. There is nothing related to India in Chinese life. India doesn't even have the ability to plagiarize, so what right does it have to say that its neighboring countries are plagiarizing?
Neighbours were powered by small eyed dragon😂😂😂😂
A country like ours which is surrounded by water from 3 sides its important to have have atleast 6 of these kind of Aircraft carriers. Considering the threat from all sides India has finally realised the importance of protecting its seas.
Today Defense Minister has said that Indian navy will go for 6 carriers Vikranth is just a beginning.
Not being nuclear and having a ski jump limits it. But it depends on their purpose for it. For global missions it would be limited because of refueling and aircraft having less payload and burning more fuel. But for protecting their local interests it works just fine.
Vikrant costs 4 Bil$. A same sized CATOBAR design and Nuke powered would cost no less than 8 Bil$, and a longer build time.
India needs multiple Carriers in short duration.
So if i have 8 Bil$, i would go for 2 Vikrant Class Carriers, than 1 INS Vishal (The nuke powered CATOBAR Carrier planned by the Indian Navy).
@@rohitb5834 Catobar design could easily double the sortie rate if not more.
@@n3v3rforgott3n9 But can 1 CATOBAR Carrier be at 2 places at once? India needs atleast 2 Carriers in theory, one for the Western Seaboard against Pakistan and one for the Eastern Sea board against China.
Apart from theory, in practical, it needs 3 Carriers, because usually at any given time, there will be 1 Carrier undergoing repairs/maintenance while 2 Carriers are operational.
@@rohitb5834 You will be having half or even less of the capabilities of a CATOBAR carrier. Frankly the distance it not so massive you need a carrier on both sides at all times. 1 Carrier being able to strike twice as many targets and put up its own EWACs and refueling aircraft is massive to help India control the Straights of Malacca which is the biggest strategical objective in the region. Will India have the planes, trained crew, and support vessels do man 2 or even 3 carrier strike groups in any short order.
@@n3v3rforgott3n9 Distance isnt massive? The distance is 2100 nm , or a 5-day sailing period from the Eastern to the Western seaboard or Vica versa. 5 days is a lot in war.
India does not need a Carrier to control the Straits of Malacca. It has the Andaman and Nicobar Islands right at the entrance of the Malaccan strait. Having islands there with military bases and large airfields act like an "unsinkable aircraft carrier". India can completely block the straits there within a matter of hours if the need be, even today.
I think the area where India needs it Carrier fleet is the Sunda Strait, between Java and Sumatra, lower down the world map. Thats another Strait where the Chinese fleet can enter the IOR. India will need a whole massive Carrier Battle Group there to block that strait in case of a war.
Yes, India will have the planes, trained crew and support vessels for 3 Carrier Battle Groups by the early 2030s when the 3rd carrier enters service.
Right now, it has 2 active Carrier Battle Groups.
And i agree with the CATOBAR benefits, but before venturing into that, India needs to quickly cover its basic interests in the near future.
Lots of pissed off Chinese and Pakistanis in the comment section. Their fear is nice.
I'm Chinese. No Chinese people in China see India as an enemy. Because India is not qualified to become a competitor to China. We Chinese people despise India and the Indian army.
In the eyes of us Chinese, India is a spineless country. The army established by India has no combat power in front of China.
@@mingmuyiyang8615so if we block ur trade route near Indonesia and India ,what will u do?
@@yashkumar3196 I am an ordinary Chinese, and I don't know what we Chinese people can do. Are you happy to hear such a reply?
@@yashkumar3196 I hope Indians read carefully and experience with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India determines the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of both countries and you will understand. India was colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, with its strength greatly reduced and its position replaced by the United States. India took the opportunity to achieve independence through a "non violent and non cooperative" approach. In other words, India's independence has not experienced the test of blood and fire, so an independent country lacks cohesion and willpower, as well as a sense of national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since the British defeated the corrupt and incompetent Qing government in 1840, the Chinese people have been living in a state of deep suffering. Various disasters and wars followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, suffering various humiliations. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan becoming a Japanese colony, the Eight Nation Alliance burning the Old Summer Palace, and the subsequent comprehensive and brutal invasion of China by Japan. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion of China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese military and civilians rose up to resist, fought in bloody battles for fourteen years, and suffered 30 million casualties, ultimately achieving victory. Do you know why there are so many casualties in China? There are hundreds of reasons, and I will only give an example to illustrate one of them: Chinese troops are in conflict with the Japanese army. Often, if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war is 100, they only have 20 to 30 firearms. The remaining soldiers did not give up resistance or surrender. They bravely fought against the Japanese machine guns and cannons with machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks until they sacrificed. This spirit of returning to death and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties because India's knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance. Do you know why there was the "Nanjing Massacre"? Because of the desperate resistance of the Chinese military and civilians, they will never surrender or give up. After Japan broke through Nanjing, it was first to vent its anger and secondly to scare off other Chinese soldiers and civilians who were resisting. However, the "Nanjing Massacre" not only did not deter any Chinese people, but also further stirred up the resistance of the Chinese people. The establishment of New China has gone through the test of blood and fire. Do you know why the Chinese national flag is red? That's because the establishment of New China was bought with the blood of countless Chinese ancestors, and we Chinese people will always remember it. From 1945 to 1949, during the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a peaceful life they had long longed for, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out, lasting three years. The Chinese Volunteer Army successfully resisted the US northward route without air or sea control, outdated military equipment, and extremely poor logistics, at the cost of losing hundreds of thousands of brave PLA soldiers. As for the 1962 Sino Indian War, which India never forgets and feels extremely humiliated, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. Firstly, it only took 32 days. Secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years after its founding, during which many people starved to death. In 1962, India's economy far surpassed that of China. The United States, Soviet Union, and Britain both support India. At that time, India implemented a "forward policy" and used elite troops to attack China. We Chinese people really don't want to go to war. The Chinese troops who joined the war with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense forces, not regular People's Liberation Army. In China, military personnel are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and military personnel are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the border of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not yield, resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it is a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than yielding is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess. So, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand tall in the world like China? Absolutely impossible.
Looks so clean.
India will become next superpower, the new aircraft carrier is amazing.
Hahaha, such a useless broken ship, how could you see its strength? Even when driving normally, the bow of the ship has to fluctuate up and down. How to make the plane take off and land
Super power
Without jobs
Without safety
Without hygiene
Without infrastructure 😂
🕉 Satyameva Jayate: Truth and Honesty and Reality gets created when Good Thoughts, Good Deeds, Good Acts are allowed to achieve the small steps needed for the correct choices and correct decisions to be made. Satyameva Jayate
Proud to see Indian warship here
This is an accomplishment.
But, it means little until India has enough carriers to keep one or two deployed all the time.
Also, IMO, India needs to have a CATOBAR true carrier.
Catapult launched planes can carry more weapons and more fuel, increasing their lethality.
True but it’s too expensive to develop given our military budget
@@sohanelavarthy5397 India's economy is growing. Firms are moving out of China, and many will go to India.
I expect India to become a true regional power with a powerful army, navy, and air force.
Not there yet, but pretty far along, IMO.
@@craigkdillon There was a huge debate- spend more on Carriers or Nuclear submarines?
INS Vishal, a 65,000 tons CATOBAR EMALS design was proposed as India's 3rd Active Carrier, along with a fleet of 9 additional Nuclear Submarines.
Offcourse both couldn go together, budget constraints.
So finally, the Indian Navy decided to tone it down to a 45,000 tons STOBAR, similar to the above INS Vikrant, as its 3rd Carrier, and most likely proceed with the 9 Nuclear Submarines over the next 15 years.
INS Vishal will be taken up in the late 2020s to replace India's INS Vikramaditya .
@@rohitb5834 Thanks for the info. Money constraints force all decisions.
@@craigkdillonalso another point, India is the 4th most powerful military on the planet, and 4th or 5th most powerful Navy. Its also in a status of a "Potential Superpower", and is the world's 3rd largest naval shipbuilder in terms of number of Naval ships under construction at the moment.
So im pretty sure it has already passed the status of a "Regional power" as of 2023.
Awesome!
It is a proud moment but catapult should have been fitted as it allows aircraft to take more ordenances and a bigger aircraft carrier which could carry Awacs like the American aircraft carriers. Raffles for the aircraft carrier instead of Mig aircraft.
I think India may be planning to move straight to vertical take off and landing aircraft which will not require the catapult system at all. My understanding is that Rafale-M have recently been decided for the carriers. I don’t think India plans on following/copying American equipment. I think India is now looking few steps ahead and/or fully ingenious defence equipment. We would have to if we don’t want to be CONSTANTLY trailing behind other powers and if we want to break the cycle. Also, American and Chinese are invading/offensive forces while India is a defensive force. The requirements are not the same and frankly neither is the budget.
The reason India is not a global superpower is because India does not project it's military power in other areas of the world, INS Vikrant is diesel powered and can not operate far from refuelling port or friendly ports hence India only uses it in the Indian ocean near to home port. However, India does not create nuclear aircraft carriers as it has no interest in taking it's military power far from home. India still remains a nation that has never attacked or invaded another country and has always defended itself during war.
India's Aircraft Carriers, Destroyers, Frigates has operational ranges of 8000 kms - 10,000 kms + and can sail for 45 days+,
India has 4 large replenishment ships that can double the range and endurance as well as overseas ports for refueling.
However with the China and Pakistan threat, 70% of the fleet has to remain in the Indian Ocean Region.
But the Indian Navy often deploys smaller fleets to the South China Sea, East China Sea and Western Mediterranean showing its Blue water capabilities.
8000 km range is this less for you😂
@@diksh777FYI India's coastline is 7,516 kms. Allowing for coastal clearances for a ship this size implies up-down coastal length of > 8,000 kms
As long as the Indian Ocean is secure, we don't have the need to project power in Pacific or Atlantic Ocean
@AkarshShukla-fn9ou @AkarshShukla-fn9ou Yes missiles and coastline length are not related.
But you sure need to polish your basic knowledge of English.
Read the comment for which my response was made. The point by @diksh777 was about ship range not missile range. Better luck next time
I'll bet the food in there is amazeballz.
😂
Meanwhile driver on the stearing -
Mai nikla oo gaddi leke 😂😂❤❤❤
India has an experience of operating Aircraft Carriers for more than 5 decades, something China will never be able to catch-up with considering they've started operating AC's as well now.
Indian typtical logic is like this:
In 2005, China GDP is 3 trillion , In 2022 India GDP is 3 trillion, so it means India is just 18 yrs behind China.
so In 1980 Bill gates has 100 dollars in his bank account, in 2023 i have 100 dollars in my pocket, so Bill gate is just 43 yrs ahead me , after 43 years , i will be the next Bill gates?
@@michaelzap8528 applying first hand Aircraft carrier operational experience and technical experties to economy 🤲 proper churchish logical woah 🤦♂️
China catch up? India is far behind China.
@@gf-ek9psyou need the dose of current affairs dear.....
@@_KRONET_108 Type 002 last drill 600 times take off & landed. This time just happening now close to 600 and increasing in South China Sea according to the Japanese news.Can Indian AC do that.There are no match between India and China.
Another one made in india carrier coming
Please correct your word, 5% made in India 95 % from Russia
@@northatlanticterroristorga1222exactly.. finally someone with brain
@@northatlanticterroristorga1222Ur mentioning INS Vikramaditya. Actually two more are coming. One is a replica of INS Vikrant and another larger one after that to replace the purchased from Russia, INS Vikramaditya.
@@dharmicwisdom9818and all of them are ski jump-50years old technology
@@amos325 The third aircraft carrier build in Bharat will have EMALS.
🇮🇳
Brilliant
I appreciate all your lovely comments. God bless you all 🙏
This is amazing! I believe soon the Indian navy would surpass China! Congratulations!
Eagerly waiting for your next work. Keep up the excellent work!
How india has gotten way better than their Neighbor Pakistan though
Not really something you'd see talked about on an engineering channel. Explaining why Pakistan is damn near a failed state is best left to geopolitics channels.
Better choices, different preferences,
We choose education over religion
Heard of Izlamic jeehad?
Moral values, ethics, education, future planing, hardwork, patriotism
And putting country first over religion.❤️
India having it's Glow up era rn
I thought only Indians liked to nod, but their ships did too😁
yeah by head nodding, Indians becme the richest ethnic group in the USA & UK.
- CEOs of global 500 companies.
- founders of highest unicorn companies in the US , of foreign birth.
right in front of your rac-sit face....& there is nothing u can do about it.
would love to see your reaction when Vivek Ramaswamy becomes US president.
Keep hating mf.... 😂
@@martinluther4720The reality is that no one cares what India is doing, there is no threat.
@@岩兔at anytime India can become like china if we showed so much blind faith and sympathy towards one political party and in alcoholic state approved them to became communist, establish one party rule in happiest state.
@@martinluther4720 so what.
Do you find it proud that india going to foreign and adoption citizenship of America. Do you think it is matter of proud?
And stop doing shit
Funny how every single westerner is ignoring the aircraft that are arming the carrier. 😂😂😂
India is developing ted bf which will replace mig 29k and will be deployed on 3rd carrier
@@killer-lordsmobile7099bruh rafales would be deployed
@@capteagle9 i was talking about indeginious option
@@killer-lordsmobile7099 ya..but you need to mention that
இந்தியா
Much better than the Chinese US aircraft carrier copycat
as Chinese，I think you are right
Fun fact : India is a 7th largest country and INS VIKRANT is also 7th largest carrier 😉😉
NICE DETIALING BY INDIA👍👍
Indian Military keep rising and rising and sure Indian Military can be strong enough against all Countries Military
Yeahhh, along with the entire Pakistan in the next 30 minutes...Dude, to get a carrier, you have to breach at least 5 layers of Air defence systems...that's not an easy task for a country like Pakistan.
India 🇮🇳🕉️🚩🗿
Nice and cute, India should build 10 at least.
congratulation from China，I think India‘s carrier is much advanced than China’s
India should buy China's 001 and 002 so that together with Vikrant, will be 3 rotational power.
😂 sure if they are willing to sell
Blah blah blah, don't you know that India is going indigenious😅
@@eladphawa7301 you didn't get the joke
@@vorrdegard2176 nope bro can you elaborate😂
@@eladphawa7301 All imported parts, and Italy design, Italy only can design mini AC, this is why India Ac is mini version. that is India type indigenious😅
❤🇮🇳❤️
Where is the Engine built?
Licensed and built in india
Can we just be objective?
Its not the most advamced by any means. Its capabilities just shouldn't be hyped as world class.
But it is a great achievement in terms of learning experience and indigenous effort. All narions have to start somewhere. That shouldn't be belittled.
πολυ καλο βιντεο
1 - No catapult (has a ski jump that cheap and technologically backward carriers use)
2 - No decent aircraft for the carrier (MIG-29s are literally one of the worst aircraft in the world)
3 - Not nuclear powered
4 - Zero supporting infrastructure around it (supply tankers, support ships)
5 - India has been operating aircraft carriers since the 1960s (I remember reading about the original Vikrant being inducted into the navy 52 years ago)
6 - Meanwhile China just started operating aircraft carriers 10 years ago and has left India waaaaaaaaaaaaay behind.
*Stop patting yourselves on the back, roll up your sleeves and actually compete with China!*
Hey jack if India had money like China it military would be far ahead.they have the necessary mean to move ahead.mr ccp.
imagine thinking India doesnt have supply tankers & support ships.......
and India is using rafale jets for this aircraft. Not Mig 29s
@@martinluther4720 *as of today NOT ONE RAFALE M JET HAS BEEN DELIVERED* 😜
@@OzzyOzir Without money, stick to bayail-gadis 😆😆
Well ,it has escort ships@@toothlessseer3153
Ccp china:
A sitting duck for our navy.
Huthis:
Look! A huge cargo vessel, FIRE!.
Keep boasting and blowing hot air. What aircrafts are deployed on board the new ship?
Aww Chyna man seems angry, doesn't he? How does that make you feel eh
@@chadj1797, hi simpleton, obviously you have no clue how the world works. Keep dreaming.
@@bhaskarneogi6706not Rafales. 1 Squadron of Mig29K( 21 fighters).
Also no need to reply to bat soup drinkers.
@@chadj1797No just a British waiting for King's funeral
@@ParaSF-im8knbruh rafales would be deployed onboard..the naval varient
🇮🇳👍🙏🙏🙏❤️
18 years it's to long to make a indigenous carrier...this should be 5 years maximum... India need 4 more aircraft carriers..to back up... enemy's are increasing no one can trust need to self sufficient..
18 years? 2019 to 2022 isnt "18 years".
@@marcd5196designing started in 2005. But cus it was the first time india has build anything by themselves, they had to figure out everything from scratch.
Next one will take 5 years.
The latest super carrier of USA "USS Gerald R Ford" took 10 to 12 year to build.
So, 18 year is not that long for a first timer.
@@Dr.Kraig_Ren i know designing started in 2005, but thats not part of the construction period.
By the logic, planning started in 1999.
@cjjk9142policies and interests change over time.
Anyway in short run India would have 3 Carriers. Maybe it would go upto 5-6 in the long run, say 2050.
We already have around 80mw of nuclear rectors for submarine's. And currently working on the development of 190mw nuclear reactors.
So possibly when we start to build 65k ton carrier possible we able Power it by nuclear power.
Currently we have properly working Kaveri Marine gas turbine engein that have enough power to run 2500 to 3000 ton class ships. And nave already have plains for it.
I just hope government start the development of more powerful marine gas turbine engein. On bases of kaveri Marine gas turbine engein for the future navy ships and submarine's.
INS Vikrant is powerful than all USA carrier. !
Nah it's not stronger than usa aircraft carriers
The wakes trail on both port and starboard sides are like giant protruding teeth of mechanical saw. Wobbling up and down unsteadily like a wild YoYo.😂😂
Don’t say your aircraft carrier is powerful if you don’t have EMALS
First go and check how many countries in the world have their own indigenous aircraft carriers then come back kid
@@chinazieswillstartww3253 lol first look at how many foreign technologies used I your boat before talking. Then my country happens to be one of the countries can indigenously build aircraft carriers with EMALS
@@amos325 What is your country? Even American ships have many foreign components kid
@@chinazieswillstartww3253 fine India is number 1, so leave me alone now
@@amos325 You are ashamed to even name your country. I wonder which country is that
Great, due to its vast ocean cover and also to maintain equal power as per our neighbours, India need two more such carriers. Of course, it is epensive to manage but due to the magnanimous size of our shore and also two critical and sensitive islets on east and west, we had to induct two more to safe guard our watery borders.
So don't mess with India now onwards .
Just in a friendly manner
There’s a reason India had to add so many weapons to this carrier. It has terrible radars. It takes forever to launch and land an aircraft. US carriers can launch 30+ jets in less than 45 minutes. It would take 45 minutes just for the Vikrant to launch a single jet. Plus all of the weapons and aircraft are from other countries. What a joke
@@Austin-cx2xe you sound like a jobless online troll
@@Austin-cx2xe "joke"? Say that to almost all NATO allies, who are solely dependent on the US. Even economically mighty Japan, South Korea, etc rely on US.
Atleast Bharat (India) has indigenous manufacturing capabilities. And BTW, INS Vikrant carries indigenous Tejas aircraft too.
@@_Mohit_Joshiyour carrier is just a christmas tree of foreign tech & components. your Tejas is useless. you need Rafales but your government is still haggling over the price. real joke haha
what "problems" did it encounter with MIG29k ?
payment issue?
as it stands today 27 Nov 2023, what aircraft does it has OPERATING on it?
a few years back there was some problems with supply of spares for the Mig29K, and hence the operational levels were low. However , its much better since 2021.
Currently, 21 Mig29K and 12 Helicopters serve on the Vikrant.
It operates mig 29 and will be replaced by Rafael fighter jet
Proud to be Indian
Who's Waiting ins Vishal?
Have toilets been installed onboard the INS Vikrant yet?
@franktoh3041 yes your family checked them out...they were so pissed off we built a carrier all by ourselves that they had to shit out their anger 😂😂😂
Atleast the toilets will be for two genders 👌
Frank, pity your dirty demented mindset. Get well soon. You're sick.
@@gourabneogi2886 Russia repair Vikrant toilets too
😂😂😂😂
INS VIKRANT looks like RF ADMIRAL KUEZNETSOV
Is this old Soviet technology?
Well Russia made extensive repairs to the Indian carrier.
The five permanent members of the United Nations were established through military strength. The Republic of China is a victorious country in World War II and is eligible to enter. The People's Republic of China relied on the Korean War to enter the five permanent members of the United Nations.
I can smell some burning in the comment section
Awesome 👍
Everything is relative, the narrator should compare this to a US supercarrier. It would makenthis Vikrannt look like a toy.
Also many of the conponents of the Vikrant sre sourced-not home made, butni guess you gotta start from somewhere.
😂😂India next super power💪💪 America next super poor😂😂next migrants refugee camps😂😂
It's indigenously built . Next one will compete with the best . As far as rankings go indian military is ranked number fourth in the world . As india grows economically so will its military .
@Akarsh2008
The US Navy has had experience building carriers since the 1940s.
We're just getting started. It'll take time, but with help we'll catch up in the next 2 decades.
What is your fkn point?
@@capteagle9 point being is this carrier is junk.
Hopefully they will install jet deflectors in the near future, otherwise, the number of flights will be severely hampered.
The only problem is that everything is very slow😢😢😢😢
The speed is increasing day by day
@@Sigma_Kitten He is talking about the time it takes to build a ship, not its cruising speed
@@Sigma_KittenHe's talking about DPSU work culture
You're joking right? Just recently MDL finished the shipbuilding 4 months ahead of the schedule, they're getting fast.
@@vatsalpatel9628 Then why are they delaying Scorpene Submarine construction so much?
sure
Nice to see foreigners crying in the comments 😹
Ekplane ekship ek power ek ambulance ek caar ek bus 4:52 ek bike ek bycycle ek hand set ek watch ek pen yha se vha se