HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024
- Telegram - t.me/AlphaDefe...
Discord - / discord
Our Web:alphadefense.in
*******************************************************
Join us on Social Media.
FB: / thealphadefense
Twitter: @alpha_defense
Instagram: @thealphadefense
Alpha Defense Hindi: / alphadefensehindi
#AlphaDefense #IndianArmy #indiannavy
Indian Navy never fails to amaze me. They always end up taking the Perfect Decision.
This is why despite it's small size, it is one of the most powerful navies in the world.
P
The best among all the three armed forces!! 🙏
Indian navy: Jalwa He Hamara 🔥
That's why I have a feeling, tedbf aircraft programs mein chahe sabse last mein develop ho par induct sabse pehle hoga
@@kamalbhullar5035 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.
I don't think that at any point in the future IN would need more than 5 Aircraft Carriers looking at our non agressive policy....3 for 3 sides of our peninsula and 2 as reserved for refit/patrolling the Indo Pacific.....so I think it's great if we are setting up a system/mechanism for the same....
Typical Indian brain . One hand your strategic policy says "Indian Ocean is our lake" on the other hand Awww we want good boy patch , validation from others , we are non agressive .
Absolute shameful . That's what a defeated society says .
I disagree, Although we have non agressive policy, we also have assets all over the world that we need to protect(military bases, ports, economic zones in foreign land, etc). hopefully, these assets will be growing in numbers in coming 20 years. We need to secure them and for that a capability intervene in 30 min at any position the world is necessary.
Every desire , directly linked with your economy.
Till the date where India reach 10 trillion dollars economy India should remain Non-agressive.
Nahi toh Russia ka haal seekh lo , unki economy bhi India itni hi thi , par abhi kya ho rakha hai.
Woh toh apne natural resources ke wajah se bach gya warna soviet Union ke tarah yeh bhi tut jata.
@@SonuKumar-xs3ge While It is true about economic power defining the Non Agression part...India already sits right on top of the global supply chain geographically....If we retain control over the Indian Ocean we have the control over entire supply chain of resources of the world....and 5 Aircraft Carriers, Andaman, Nicobar, Lakshadweep and The Islands we have on lease or have logistics access to like Assumption Islands, Maldives, Seychelles and the port's like Duqm, Chabahar, Changi, Egypt, Israel, and in the near future Gwadar....would be more than enough to do that....That alone has the power to bring the world to its knees without shooting a bullet....And Pacific, Artic and Atlantic are inaccessible to India....US has this very god gifted position to have direct (land) access to 5 of the 4 oceans of the world (North and South Atlantic on the East Coast, Pacific on the West Coast, Artic on the West of Alaska) that with their money and Dominance policy gives rise to such a dominant navy....so we must focus on that one ocean where US does not have a major presence(It does but there are other navies here like Japanese, Chinese, Indonesian and Indian Ofcourse ...)
We already have our Islands which In future will be used as an aircraft base on both sides of the peninsula.. in my opinion 5 aircraft carriers will be an overkill considering the budget of the navy
Indian Navy can have 4 aircraft carriers . INS Vikrant and its sister carrier and 2 LHDs can act as Aircraft carriers with LCA Navy as main carrier fighter similiar to approach followed by America class carriers of US Navy which are big LHDs.
2 repeat order of INS Vikrant makes sense for Indian navy. This will help us to replace Vikramaditya asap. 5 years per Vikrant means 10 years. Average lifespan of aircraft carrier is 30 years. This means Indian navy will have a period of around 18-20 years for INS Vishal.
Truly Fact Based Discussion Covered Every Each Sector.
You Deserve Millions Of Subscriber.
सत्यमेव जयते 🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏🙏.
Mai to hamesha se kehte aaya hoon Navy ko 2 aircraft carrier par work krna chahiye jab IAC 3 bankar ready hoga tab tak INS Vikramaditya ke retirement ka time aa jayega uske retire hone ke direct bad Navy IAC-3 ke hi design par IAC-4, 5 aur bhi aircraft carrier plan kar sakti hai economy aur enemy ko dekhte huye. Nice step
Subodh your voice is one of the many things because of which your video quality becomes top class. Its very soothing to ears. Ignore trolls who are jealous of your voice.
Your voice very cute 🥰
Proper explaination makes your video ultimate....Jai hind from overseas 🧘♂️🇮🇳🙏🪖💪🤝🫂🌍
Can you Please make videos on Indian Naval Doctrine and doctrines of other services if possible.
Indian Navy is always Proactive amongst all the services would love to know about their doctrine.
actually i was thinking about this last month. Why not have another vikrant and make Vishal IAC 3.. then i was like NAHH im sure the navy wont have such an Idea.. but look at the irony.😌
yes
I also think India should go for a Vikrant class carrier i mean 1 CATOBAR and 1 ski jump doesn't add up it's better we induct 2 Vikrant class and 2 Vishal class flat top carriers by 2040.
I think IN should not wait for EMALS for IAC-2 it may take too long to mature...instead go for conventional flat-top with steam catobar & 52-55000 ton wt class...then go for nuclear power & emals in IAC-3
Now that it has been almost final that a follow on order of Vikrant class will be given we will have these in service at least for next 30 years.....and looking at the payload and fuel limitation of STOBAR carriers Navy should seriously consider buying its own dedicated 4 A330 MRTT or B767 MMTT so that our aircrafts can take off with full weapons load and limited fuel but can top up their fuel through aerial refuellers
Eh bro.. thats very impractical
@@Stephen7344 please suggest your approach to overcome limitations of STOBAR carriers.....pls don't say make a flat top carrier
@B&B no brother obviously not. I have 3 suggestions
1. Atleast 2 fixed wing aircraft can act as Tankers by carrying as many External fuel tanks as possible and do buddy buddy refueling
2. Have a drone like MQ-5
3. Have tanker Version on V22 osprey.
If u think properly. We have a lot of options
@@Stephen7344 in all options the buddy refueling is viable and practical option!
But i do hv few points to suggest like as far as i can get from past/recent articles published:
as navy is recalculating its assets and they r trying to go beyond IOR!
With 2 AC in operation in near future navy as already started thinkin abt carrier deployment beyond IOR!
As we know Vikrant is going to b operationalize by end of this year but the actual deployment will b only possible after 2025-26!
Before this it will sail in IOR and do exercises with different navy's and they will develop their tactics for operations!
Whereas its CBG components r still either maintenance/refit or under production.
Delhi class is under refit
Nilgiris r under production
By 2025-26 all will join the navy and will form CBG for vikrant and hoping till then few of Rafale will arrive!
Now deploy Vikrant in SCS we need strong CBG and lethal airwing!
Now the real problem of aircraft takeoff weight matters.
In SCS we can't airborne with less wepons but also we can't airbornes for just few hour coz of less fuels:
So the best option is dedicate Few aircrafts on carrier for buddy refueling but this will hamper actual capability of airwing and its like underuse of capability!
So my point is just try to acquire permission to few countries in SCS for accessing their Base for deployment of our tankers on these bases!
If Malaysia/Philippines allow us to use their bases for our tanker so they can increase of airborne time exponentially!
Having tanker in airspace for refueling is best way and this is possible if we have either bases their or permission of few countries to use their base.
@Ãlphãťřøñ Mëmëš having tankers in the Airspace near SCS is one of the worst decisions we can take rn. They have a huge RCS and can be shot down with AWACS killers. Plus we already deployed Ins Vikramaditya with INS Delhi And 3 other Arliegh Burke class destroyers of USN in SCS once somewhere in 2020 or 2021. That also was a one time thing. No country will risk sending an entire CSG/CBG near china.. cause the Chinese are stupid and need the smallest reason to start a war and they can start by sinking yr CSG if they get too close. US lost 2 Carrier strike groups minimum in every simulated conflict with China. Our navy will be purely a Defensive Navy.. will not conduct missions in SCS. Only nuclear powered vessels can venture that far from home land. None of our Aircraft carrirs will go that far during a conflict.
Anyway. The point is.. Buddy buddy refueling is best rn and is also being used. Other way we have V22 osprey cheaper than MRTT
Yes, Even If Indian Navy Wants To Build 45,000 Ton Class Aircraft Carrier Then Also Flat Top Aircraft Carrier Will Unlock Seamless Possibilities !!!
One reserve and three carriers for three directions of our ocean
The Navy can ask for the flat top carrier, get all the work done and get the knowledge and know-how; once it's made and when Vikrant goes into primary refit, ways can be looked to fit the catapult mechanism on it.
🤦🏾♂️
Bhai woh toy ship nahi hai , ship designing har chez ko dhyan mai leke ki jati hai jisse uska centre of gravity sahi rahe.
Aur ha koi bhi apne ek lothe best asset pe experiment nahi karta.
Russia ne bhi cruiser ko vikramaditya tab banaya tha jab woh retire hogya tha aur is kaam mai bhi 10 saal lag gaye thae.
@@SonuKumar-xs3ge tabhi maine likha hai "ways can be looked". System modelling and simulation krke phle dekha jaa skta hai ki if it's possible or not. If itys feasible something can be considered if not you can have one ac already made.
Indian Navy must have at least aircraft carrier for national security threats and sovereign including Indian Ocean region security. Jai Hind.
👍 Jay hind 🇮🇳
It's a wow factor for the INDIAN Navy. In total 4 Aircraft Carriers is a good development & simultaneously the Submarine fleet is also to be addressed. ❤️🇮🇳🪔
Iac 2 has to be equipped with EMALS system
I think this is a good decision from the Navy. It is never wrong to have more numbers.
Usually raat ko video aati hai. Aur soft spoken tone behtar hai.
Conflict X ki Akashwani wali voice with sudh Hindi bhi mast hai.
Mere hissab se
Jai Hind 🇮🇳
Nice video, have watched it fully. But keeping our economy and MOD in mind I can tell 3 aircraft carrier is a mere fantasy, let alone 4.(as given in thumbnail)
Hey , Alpha
can you make and video on new dimension of warfare especially space and cyber warfare
And Bharat's preparation toward them
Jai hind🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
And then BARC will get sufficient time to build a 500mw small nuclear power plant to be fitted in IAC-3❣️
Navy nuclear attack submarines bhi lelo
Naval version of Tejas should be developed at high priority to equip all the carriers
Bahut hi achhi plan hai hmare navy chief ka. But Mai unse khta hoon ki pls aap 3 helicopter carriers pe kaam shuru kre. Ye indian navy ko aur majboot krega. 👉👉😥💔🙏🙏👉👉😥😥💔💔🙏🙏😥😥💔🙏🙏👉👉😥😥💔💔🙏🙏😥😥💔🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
I'm just a normal student but cant get proper answer for why we rnt concerned bout SUBMARINE fleet,we r 8th or sl,while in AC we r 3rd or so...?
I should go ahead with Flat top aircraft carrier
Under water robitc solder be focus
Very good news. 😍
I am thinking that will the TEDBF have catapult mechanism ... Only then Navy can construct CATOBAR carrier
JAI HIND 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳
4 Aircraft Carriers for Bharat Navy is a good idea, don't worries for funds our govt ias babus can fund as many Aircraft Carriers is needed ! Jai Hind Jai Bharat
India needs a lot of next generation submarines to defend its teritory against china
Vikrant type(dimensions) with catobar configuration .take help from France or usa . It will be a learning experience for Vishal.
No subodh bhai. Navy is going correct. At that time vikrant 2 is making sense. Navy is only the force in India showing great mind in using available resources unlike IAF who want to remain in dreams
Gazab ka video 👌🏻
Add to cart kr diya h bus payment pending h
😂😂😂
😂😂.
Yehi haal mine swiper , MMRCA , project 75i , LHD ka hai 🙏
Why flat bed aircraft carrier ?
Well with my viewpoint of very long term indian navy should go for 3 AC's which will be flatops with nuclear powered having a project timeline of 15 to 20 years and this should go in parallel with Nuclear powered submarines.
Please explain Rocket Assisted Take off ( RATO) . Is it used in aircraft carriers? If not ,why not ? And where is it used ?
RATO aka JATO is kinda wasteful for usual carrier take offs since it uses rocket boosters iirc
Awesome 👍
Thank you! Cheers!
Indian navy under utilizing its budget .
China is planning to build 10Aircraft carrier by 2035
Dear Alpha Defence . Can you give some update about IJT-36 Sitara. Is it's all trails completed? .When will IAF order these as a replacement of Kiran trainers ?
It will happen after
50 years .
100% 🙏👏👏
India has a lot of money to make a 3rd and 4th carrier.
IAC -1 took 13 years ,🤔.
India should buy atleast one cvn75 from USA on urgent basis.....
If this order for another air-craft carrier is sought , hope it is not going to be another “cart before the horse” planning ! A/C is ready but no fighters !
Bhai lift badi bnaa lena bas
Noted bro🤓
Ins vikrant ka lift bada hi hai
Ho yeh galti toh sudhar jaayegi 😄
Just a Question curiosity of sorts, the navy couldn't get the kind of AC it wants because of budget constraints so hence their gonna order another class of our current AC but they'll go with another of the kind the navy wants at a later date but won't that be an even bigger waste of money rather than order another current class why not instead make it now instead of a 4th AC why not just go ahead with the kind of Carrie they wanted alot of money could be save just a curiosity
*India should target making a twin engine Naval LCA. Use GE 404. The rest is more or less there.*
So what do you think TEDBF is.
@@SonuKumar-xs3ge Uses GE 414 and is much heavier plus has a different geometry to Tejas.
@@Value_Pilgrim frist off all if we intall twin GE-F404 engine then it wouldn't remain LCA , it will became Medium weight fighter.
And fir installing 2 engine it's width , length will be increased , basically it will became a new fighter jet . And it's all testing will be done from scratch as fuel consumption , payload capacity power generation everything will be changed.
The what is the point of developing it.
We are already working in TEDBF.
BHARAT SHOULD CONTINUE CONSTRUCTION OF 4TH /5TH /ON WARDS AIRCRAFT CARRIERS AS THERE CAN BE NUMEROUS PURCHASER FOR THE SAME AND SHALL YIELD MORE AND MORE INCOME TO OUR COUNTRY. I WORKED ON 1ST I.N.S. VIKRANT ON BOARD IN MID-1980s. IN THAT THERE WAS NO AC CABINS EVEN FOR COMMISSIONED OFFICERS. BUT NOW THE SYSTEMS ARE 99% ADVANCED. BUT THE MAIN ENGINES MUST BE RUN WITH NUCLEAR POWER AND IF FEASIBLE AUXILIARY ENGINE FOR POWER GENERATION ALSO MAY BE NUCLEAR TOO.
Bhai , how many shells can we theoretically manufacture in an year ?
Size of coming carrier should be atleast 40% bigger
New conspcet
IAC 2 Kum se kum catobar to hona hi chahiye aur tedbf ki nose cone ki length mujhe graphics k hisaab se kum lagti hai.......
How about a go fund navy and air force campaign to help armed forces to meet their goals
Best option France ka new pang class carrier 75k ton hai mere hisab se abhi navy ko p75 alpha pe focus karna chahiye 3 carrier ko thoda delay karke pang class carrier banana chahiye 2030 se construction start karke 2040 tak commissioned hojayega fir every dacade 1 carrier banake 2070 tak 4 catobar carrier ho jayega (vikramaditya 2050 & vikrant 2060 me retire kardo) fir 2080 se new design ke sath 80k to 85k ton ka new generation se inhe replace kardo isse every decade new carrier banane se ek ecosystem vi create ho jayega & s5 class submarine ka 2 nuclear reactor se pang class ko power vi kiya ja sakta hai
ROCKET BUSTERs (extra ) should be used to launching of heavy air carft.....Is it possible?
those things arent reliable ! experiments were done in past
@@AlphaDefenseHindi right, rockets uses solid fuel and once they fire there is no stopping or can't be controlled.
@@AlphaDefenseHindi new technology/ upgraded ROCET BUSTERS could have changed the scenario.... already being used in drones....
@@AlphaDefenseHindi tu air craft carrier ko frigate toh nahi samajh ta hai na tere videos dekh ke aisa lagta hai ke kal hi india 6th generation fighter jet introduced krwa dega
the thing is vikramaditya is dud... so three more to achieve goal of having 3 carrier.
means by 2030 vikramaditya would be retired , even if they launch the new carrier in 2028 and then start construction of another then they will still be on time plus in 5 years most of technologies could be gained for new IAC 3 and tested even so its a better decision .
Not happening before 2045!
Need a larger CBG to patrol Indian Ocean.
We need more aircraft carrier, we need at least 5 air carriers by 2030 as china will operate minimum 8/10 aircraft carriers by 2030, so we urgently need 5 aircraft carriers as well as 4 Helicapter carriers,
I wud say india sjould Go for 3 vikrant size ship ..
Jay hind
If resources are not a major hurdle, then Navy can indeed go in for a CATOBAR aircraft carrier. I believe the Charles de Gaulle is of a similar displacement as the INS Vikrant.
Yes…India should bargain hard with France for this technology in return of the huge Rafale deal it is going to place!! Kuch to milna chahiye in return.
@@uniani01 What I ment to say was that it is possible to have a CATOBAR system in a 45,000 to 50,000 tonn displacement carrier. The Charles De Gaulle is a good example of one.
The French system is steam operated I think & not an Electro Magnetic launch system.
@@finderskeepers7293From where do you will arrange nuclear reactor.
Because France wouldn't provide it.
@@SonuKumar-xs3ge True, French arguably have the most efficient nuclear tech and they are very possessive of that. They won't share nuclear technology with us or quote a price which would be downright unaffordable.
But I read somewhere that BARC is developing nuclear reactors better than the one plying on INS Arihant for our new SSNs; maybe we can use the same tech to power our Aircraft carrier.
@@Dennis56781000 BARC is yet on overdrive mode they are busy till 2032-35 for developing nuclear reactor for our 6 upcoming sub .
INS arihant 83MW is a 2nd gen reactor
And upcoming reactor is based on Russian tech which will have power rating of 190 MW.
0:30 But in the title , it says 4 .
I am sure Vikramadiya won't be decommissioned so easily
What about LHDs? Its been 2 decades now still no tie up or indigenous option.
2 decades ?? Huh
I think they have forget that they need LHD and mine swiper ships
Badass Hari Kumar
India ke pass 10 aircraft carrier hona chahiye or nuclear submarines pr jayeda Dhyan de tab yuddh jitna aasan hoga
Sir payment aap cash mai dege , ya card se.
USA walo ki 10 carrier samhalne mai band baj rahi hai jinke 700 billion dollars Defence budget hai.
😅😅😅😅😅🤦♂️
India can design 42-ton class the charles de gaulle aircraft carrier by make in India
I believe cochin shipyard can design that...
This will be the best option for the Indian navy rather than the 65-ton class ins Vishal
Well I'm very glad that India going to procure 4 aircraft carriers
Instead of CDG, we can collab with the French for their under-the-works aircraft carrier
Just cut some freebies and subsidies 😒 itna mushkil kya hai isme .
Infrastructure and expertise
Why we don't make AC like charlsdegol class & vikrant class hibrid. Means tonnage 40 to 45 thousand flat top carrier
We don't have expertise , of either nuclear reactor nor of flat top carrier designing
Why to retire ins vikramaditya so early?
Its life projected 40 - 50 years
Woh said it's life is 25 years max - extended to 30 .
It's modified retired cruiser battle ship.
Instead of 65 tons carrier india navy can have 45 tons ins vikrant type it is easy losing one ship we can have 4 carriers
First of all built the aircraft carrier and then show the power of Indian navy
one more vikrant class... one 65k and another 100k+ class aircraft carrier.
Bhai bas kar kahi 5th carrier aap 150k+ mat bol dena , USA wale bhi ro dege. 😂
3 carriers are sufficient to cover Indian Ocean par next 2 carriers flat top wale built karne chahiye, aur Jo 65 ton wala hai wo to nuclear powered hona chahiye
Aur Jo uske next wala ho wo to udna bhi chahiye
@@सलमानरुश्दी-ह1छ can be considered 😂
Yehi Pe Khaoge Ya Phir Pack Karwa Doon Sir ?
@@Biplab23 pack karwa dena aur bache paiso ki tip rakh lena.
@@tumbler8324 Paise diye Bina bhaag Gaye tum 🤣
Govt crowd fund bhi kar sakti hai Aircraft Carriers ke liye... Me bhi de dunga 100-200 rupaye
Why are we obsessed with getting emals. When Steam catapults can do the job at least for a couple of decades. NLCA also can carry more payload.
I fact make IAC-2 stobar and then upgrade IAC-1 also to stobar.
Because it takes a large space , you have to wait for long time as to generate required steam pressure for launch .
@@SonuKumar-xs3ge but it would still be faster than ski jump right?
With advantage that one aircraft can carry 3 times the payload as compared to ski jump
@@pravinmeher2036 ya it's better than ski jump.
But you can't fit steam catapult in IAC as it runs on Mraine jet engine rather than steam boilers as what is present in INS vikramaditya or older vikrant.
So from where do you will generate steam.
@@SonuKumar-xs3ge how about adding a INS Arihant type nuclear reactor? I know it's complicated but it's doable isn't it?
ऐसा हे सैना के सामने ज्यादा रास्ते नही और हे भी तो उनकी लिमिट हे अभी जो मिल रहा हे सैना को लेना चाहिए बाकी रोते रहो जब मुसीबत सामने होगी तब ना समय होगा ना पैसा फिर एक दुसरे के मु ताकना वेसे भी 10 15 साल बाद एक कैरियर तो कबाड मे जाएगा।
Clickbaity title - IN will only ever have 3 aircraft carriers, with INS Vikramaditya being decommissioned before IAC 3's commissioning. By your title's reckoning of including decommissioned vessels - the IN "has" 4 carriers already, counting the old, decommissioned INS Vikrant and INS Viraat.
VKD won't go out so easily
Atleast 20 more years
@@AlphaDefenseHindi Remember, that hull is already 40 + years old, and operates beyond it's designed displacement as a helicopter-carrying cruiser. That's at a time when modern navies generally decommission conventional vessels after 35 years or so.
The reason we retained the Viraat as a zombie carrier limping along for so long, was to retain carrier ops knowhow and doctrine during the VKD delay. With IAC 1 and 2, there will be no reason to keep the already problematic VKD in service beyond another 15 years at most. And that's an optimistic timeline for a 65,000 ton IAC 3.
Mark my words..
India will never buy IAC 3.
Coz developing greater nicobar is equilent to 2 aircraft carriers...
Plus we need submarines nd fighter drones at priority,
So i dunt see order of IAC3 in next 15 years
We have atleast 4 to 5 carriers in future believe or not. Remember this
Yeah but once we have 5 we have INS Vikrant Already going to Retire
damn, a random youtube account is saying this, this is fore sure a true prophecy
We will have , as our economy will increase everything will be possible .
Dedo bhai repeat order
Thanks. It was frank comment. No offense.
🙂
Ind need to focus navy heavily but ind govt very slow and thatswhy china roam freely roam around indian ocean stronger the navy stronger secure our eco
Pahle new aircraft carrier k liye aircraft to lelo
Sir kya Romiyo helicopters deliver hochuke hai?
yup
@@AlphaDefenseHindi sare?
I think Indian Navy should collaborate with French Navy to develop new aircraft carrier. Because French Navy already in process to develop their 2 aircraft carrier.
Can catapult be combined with an angled deck?
it can be but it will create problems to aircraft , there are chances of it to crash more often that's the reason they use it on flat deck based carriers but it can be combined just the problem is aircrafts ground clearance as the fuel tank would blast if it undergoes more friction than prescribed one.
I sure they would have simulated that
@@AlphaDefenseHindi with nuclear propulsion, possible catapult assisted system and bigger lifts, IAC 2 might be a better Charles de gaulle class ship. And a test bed for IAC 3 technologies.
@@jishnuprakashbaruah from where do you will get , nuclear reactor.
Four in your dream.
By the time the fourth AC is ready INS Vikramaditya will be outdated
Why can't India go for 2 mini lighting carrier with drones in it we can deploy it in South China with friendly countries when China comes to Indian ocean.
It is not a replacement of aircraft carriers.
Until we have our next carrier China will be in our doorstep.
If we have something similar to Japanese careers will add value to it... If we are going for same size careers.
Japanese carrier cost almost equivalent toh INS vikrant.
Kapil Sharma Show Dekhna Band Kar Du Kya ?
lol
Chalu hi kyu kiya tha 😂😂
🤣🤣
The show is not fun anyways..
Ab bhi dekh te ho ?
No way We don't have that much money to waste on Navy's fancies More so when we need many more submarines which are 10x more important
News - total of 1 minute.
Video - total of 6 minutes
😐😐😐😐
You sure you are here for news ?? Galat jagha pe aagaye aap
@@AlphaDefenseHindi yes I subscribed here and not other defence channels for news and updates only.
But sadly in recent times this channel is also quickly becoming like other defence channels who unnecessarily stretch the video.