The MOST powerful smartphone chip 3.0! A16 vs 8+ Gen1 vs Tensor 2 vs Exynos vs Dimensity vs Kirin!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
- Head to squarespace.co... to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code "versus"!
Round 3 of the best and most detailed chipset comparison on RUclips is underway! With a few upgrades like Apple's A16 Bionic, Google's Tensor 2, and the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, we are sure to achieve some different results. Joining them is the Exynos 2200, the Dimensity 9000, and the Kirin 9000. Which one will outperform the other in this showdown, and which is your favorite? Let us know in the comments below!
Check out our social media 👇
Instagram: / versus_comparisons
TikTok: / versus_com
Facebook: / versusio
Ozzy's Instagram: / ozzyuncu
For more details check out #VERSUS 👉 versus.com/
Get the devices here 🛒
iPhone 14 Pro Max: amzn.to/3zfQeBx
Google Pixel 7 Pro: amzn.to/3F3hdDU
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra: amzn.to/35KTF7l
Xiaomi 12S Ultra: amzn.to/3Cf56AM
Oppo Find X5 Pro: amzn.to/3NNnK7I
Huawei Mate 40 Pro: amzn.to/3nbwl6i
Gear we use to make videos 📷
Camera: amzn.to/2RuWSgC
Lens: amzn.to/3c3h4ji
Mic: amzn.to/3ntp5Cz
Main light: amzn.to/3iBDEln
Second light: amzn.to/2FIJVgy
* All Amazon links above result in a commission given to us by Amazon, with no extra cost to you! 
Наука
![Eminem - Somebody Save Me (feat. Jelly Roll) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Vwa0HenQMi4/mqdefault.jpg)
Used to care a lot about chipset performance by comparing benchmark scores. But now I only care about the chipset efficiency for better battery endurance.
Yes, the growth of technology has drastically improved such that, e.g. SD 778 a midrange chip of 2022 performs much better than flagship of 2020, as you said efficiency and battery life is need of the hour,
This test is not really a good example for battery efficiency. Keep in mind that Android SoC have immense peak power draw. Some can reach 10-11W. This sound bad for the battery but it actually generate so much heat that the power goes all the way down hence why we see android chips performing so much worse than A16. Yet A16 draws a lot less power but sustain it for longer thus losing slightly more % points than SD device for example.
@@davout5775 That happened only in snapdragon 888 and 8Gen1
Mainly because of the really inefficient Samsung fabrication process and that only happened in Gaming phones with Max performance turned on
Now the 8+Gen1 peaks at 7W even in gaming phones
Normal phones only go 4 ~ 6W now
I agree. Personally I think that in the coming years the phone industry is going to be more battery based while having great features without drastically killing your battery.
Facts
Interesting is the fact that tensor was the coolest in most tests
How good it would be if it was from tsmc foundry.
well slower it goes cooler it runs. tensor is lagging behind when it comes to speed
@@sercan272727 can't deny but at final it wasn't slowest processor and i compare it to previous year tensor which could rub shoulders with exynos and dimensity in this surface
@@kishoredhonishoty let's hope they make it in the future and not Samsung
Also the slowest...
I think you should have compared the battery percentage loss in relation with the size of the battery. 22% loss in a 5000 mah battery is a greater loss than 24% loss in a 4300 mah battery.
He didn't because that is irrelevant for user experience.
¿No es lo mismo?, ambos perdieron mismo porcentaje
Exactly 👌
4 watt is the current mobile cpu technology. I think you're talking about resolution. 1440p will drain faster than 1080p. Then the apps, wifi, 4g 5g, brightness, 120hz, and aod.
Then he would have had to also take a look at the brightness, refresh raze and resolution of the screen Mate
You should have not included the Kirin because it's a 2020 processor and looks like the scores are dropped too much then before, maybe because of updates and lack of Google
With 2019 cpu cores the A77
@@user-hm8xh9yw5w 在2021年的时候，骁龙以及苹果芯片都还没有太多优势，对于麒麟，要拿麒麟笔的话，应该拿骁龙888或者a14和天机1100。
True and this guy wonders why it takes longer here and there, i commented just 2 minutes that's its a CPU from 2020. Like either don't include it all or don't wonder bcs that's kinda cringe
Thanks for this content! Would've been interesting if in place of Kirin there was a midrange chip like SD 778G just to check how far they are vs top class
sd 778g is a beast
No matter ehat snap was that apple is far better when it comes to a battery bench performance chipset
no, it's for kirin fanboy, and wish they will do comeback !!
Matthew 4:17 (KJV) From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
For some reason, it seems that the A16 Bionic is most powerful when it comes to rendering, no idea how or why but somehow it makes sense
Because apple focuses on that the most
NVME storage >>> UFS
We must not forget that Apple’s GPU is TBDR, from a research on this Technology.
@Schwozboi nahh, all the games which we are playing in mobile run smoothly in ios better. iPhones get high frame rate compared to android. Mac only doesn’t have many AAA games because of games support in macos. iPhone provides the best gaming experience.
cause apple has the smallest chip
you should also add the throttling test.Helps to know the real performance winner
yeah, like the ul benchmark shown stable result in percentage, after long heavy test, that will be good 😊
Thank you for this amazing comparison and we really appreciate your efforts.
I would love to see a comparison between generations of the best snapdragon processors within the last 5 years.
Same with apple bionic processors, I know you can do it 🔥🔥
A generations of Exynos processors
It’s not only this add also that the cameras of iPhone 14 pro are something we never seen in a phone you can record video and focus on something really close and you can see every little detail it’s impressive I prefer this by just taking photos of the moon! The moon is just moon but this option can give you some really good photos in the nature and in everything else 😉
Gotta say I love the way you do your graphs. They are super clean and professional looking. Keep it up 👍
You probably wanted to test the latest Kirin processor respectively the latest and greatest model from all known brands. However, it is still nonsense to test the old HiSilicon Kirin 9000. At it's time, it was one of the most powerful smartphone processors. Since then, however, newer and more advanced processors have come onto the market.
what is the latest of kirin?
@@debatetv5794 HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G from 2020
@@y43s yes 9000 from 2020 crystal, what is the latest chip of kirin 2022?
@@debatetv5794 The Kirin 9000 was the last chip Huawei made. Because of the US sanctions, they couldn't develop new ones.
@@y43s ah, i thought they made a new chip.
Bro you definitely deserve 10M subs bro, Because of your impressive work...
You are too kind!
Congrats on 125K subscribers! Onwards and upwards team Versus! 🍻🤩👏
Thank you! 😀
I ran that web based test on my iPhone SE (2020) and got 755.91 in it!!
geek bench-802(single) & 1365(multi)
ML-313
I'm impressed!!
This is really insane. Every video you made is just awesome and I just love it. Keep working. Love you brother.
Thank you very much!
Jk
Do this again when 8 gen 2 and 9200 comes on a phone
We will!
That bionic chip is crazy fast! I will notice it especially when editing videos. I just can't imagine the other three chips since I'm already having bad experience with Snapdragon on my Samsung Ultra.
@grous sucks but still it performs better than any other chip can ever achieve in a decade
@grous but android phones need at least twice the amount of RAM to even compete… I’ll have some of what you’re smoking 🤣
@@D3ZG1978 not to mention the best battery life is still on iphones, i don't know about current gen but last gen the 13 pro max was so far ahead of androids that it beat some android flagships with 20-50% more battery duration despite having half the battery capacity.
Android gen 8 💪💪💪
@@D3ZG1978 because ram speed are better on apple
Could you rank the chips based on their overall performance at the end?
A16- snap 8+gen 1 - dimencity - tensor.- Exynos- kirin
Google said the ML Benchmarking tools aren't designed to properly capture what Tensor is capable of. Either way, it's still the chip that makes the most of it's ML capabilities in a visible and beneficial way to the user.
I do not agree. I would argue that A16 is maybe just as useful. The amazinf camera performance of any iPhone since iPhone X is boosted by the amazing NPU of Apple. The AI chip is also used in the Face ID system, translation through the camera, Live text where the AI recognizes text from photos no matter handwritten or not. You can even use that feature in videos. Also something very interesting at least to me is how powerful Apple's AI is within the new customization on the lock screen. The AI can even recognize when the material in the photo is solid or transparent like a glass and make it transparent so you can actually see the part of the time that is behind the object. Extremely impressive! Also something that Google had before but Apple made it better is the ability to take a person from a photo and paste is somewhere else. There are ofc other applications and especially in 3rd party apps. That's why IMO the iPhone's AI is just as good as Google's
Mediatek Deminsity 9200 already surpasses Tensor 2 in AI and ML. Tensor is a brand name so Google could easily use the Deminsity 9200 next year for Tensor 3.
they said that coz they know its a piece of shit
@@j0ps-xfx Except that Google knows more about ML than you and I do considering they are the biggest AI company in the world. Also, the Pixel 7 / Pro are two of the smoothest and most fluid phones out there.
Still google competes with apple and beats apple most of the times when it comes to A.I.
Imagine how much capable it will be with good hardware
1:54 People: “I am exited about this, but NO”😂
Quality video, thanks for making this. Lots of details, very informative and entertaining
Would love to see the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 be thrown into the mix. My S23 Ultra with this chip is both mindblowing in speed and battery efficiency.
I feel like 1,3 million score on Antutu would provide enough compute performance on a phone, at least until 2030. They need to stop trying to be the highest performer on it's class and goes hard on making the chip more efficient while being used at it's max. Also enhance the AI learning ability, ISP, and etc. We need compact phone for sure, it could be easier to make compact phone if the chip is more efficient, doesnt need bigger battery to run full day of daily usage.
exactly, even midrange phones have better CPU than my fucking desktop PC, normal people aren't gonna use the whole potential of 1,3M antutu. they really should focus on improving AI, power efficiency, ram management and this stuff.
I'm not apple guy but i gotta admit that apple did this right. they may have lower score even by half but the iphones are less laggy and last several years because of these optimisations
For snapdragon tests in future pls use proper ultra performance devices like ROG, iqoo that are better optimised for performance than 12s ultra that usually scores less, due to performance not being the main concern of device
No, those phones are mostly game-oriented phones. but Xiaomi 12S ultra appeals to general performance.
@@_aa_a6643 its score is less than most general snapdragon phones.
also if u leave rog then also samsung is fully optimizing exynos for its phone, tensor for google and apple just has edge for having everything under control. so whats the problem if snapdragon and MT are being optimised
@@devanshanil2468 i agree with the other guy.
For daily perfomance testing putting gaming phones aside is ideal, they got internal cooling which is kinda cheating.
This test is about best perfomance dailydrivers power and battery wise not about the most powerful.
@@saulsulca5010 i told in the reply to leave rog (and other ultra performance )aside then also general device has better scores than 12s because it scores less compared to other normal phones. iqoo , realme devices all have good scores while exynos , tensor , bionic all are fully optimizes for one single phone they come with. i will say that even more being biased towards those performance. MT and SD make general socs that scores good in optimized devices and little bit less in these not for general audience devices(like 12s). so a oneplus realme iqoo these do good in MT and SD chips.
12s Ultra is the fastest android phone it has avarage 59fps on Genshin Impact max graphics even better than the whole iPhone 14 Series.
Rumor is that S23 series will ditch the Exynos chipset for once and for all :)
And other rumors says otherwise, also Exynos is excellent
The A16 Bionic is insane. I'm glad that I ordered the new iPhone :D
i got 14 pro max 1 tb 3000$
8gen 1 💪💪
@@luckydepressedguy8981 the 14 pro max 256 was enough storage for me :D hope it will arrive soon.. waiting for a month now
Unpopular opinion: This Channel is better than Twitter.
Very popular opinion!
@@Versusdotcom LOL okay
Would have loved to see the basemark test all on Chrome, as Safari is extremely optimized for Apple devices and Chrome is available on all devices but not the built-in Android browser so it does not have inherent preference. I use Vivaldi as my browser both on my phone and desktop, and did a comparison between Vivaldi and Chrome, 337 and 406 respectively with a Galaxy S10e on Android 12
Just tested it on my iPhone 13 Pro Max in chrome, the score was 1321 - so still beating the new snapdragon by much though.
@@maxxkx have you seen a big change between Safari?
@@klausjackklaus Safari surprisingly scored less with 1189 points :D
AFAIK all browsers use Safari under the hood on iOS
I love the nerdy and informative content...😊
More to come!
I think you are the only tech youtuber doing this, Really appreciate your efforts keep it up,
Thanks a ton!
Nah a ytuber geekerwan did the same thing in even more detail but that test does not have Kirin chips or the A15,A16
@@shreshta_yt bro, thanks for recommending that geekerwan, just now watched, geekerwan analysis is exemplary and remarkable, if you some other channel pls suggest, of I had know that channel last month it would have helped in buying better mobiles in Flipkart BBD / Amazon GIF
@@rrr-pc6rm no i don't have any more geeky channels to offer but cheak out | mores law is dead | or | gamers nexus | if ur into pc stuff
Glad i could help someone
640 single core on exynos?
mine performs about 1100 on android 13
You should make a performance test opening apps and games and seeing how long it takes the devices to do so and if they keep them open in the background
That's actually a really good idea!
There are many channels that do this kind of test already.
@@Nippleless_Cage yea, than this channel do this kind of test mean it's already good, no need test like other do much already
Looks like Tensor is the best optimized for it's real world performance though it's scores are very less.
It is slowest not best optimized
@@Rahat2995 as per the tests it's the weakest chip but if you see the real world performances it's actually fast and very smooth.
@@Gopinathk17 these are real world lmao
@@rebel2809 no, these are just the chip performance tests based on some benchmarks, not the real world tests/use cases. Believe me at times I felt it's laggy, jittery and slowness on my S22 ultra but not even a single time my pixel 7 pro was slow, using it past 1 month, it's my smoothest experience that I ever had on Android. I can say it's on par with iPhone (I know because I use an iPhone as well). I'm not a hard gamer so can't talk abt it, but I play subway surfers and temple run sometimes, never had an issue.
The one and only issue that I have on my 7 pro is, battery heating issues(some times) and slow charging, recently observed that signals were last 1-2 times at some places( could be genuine network provider issues, not sure).
All chips seem capable but for battery and heat tensor does appear the winner
It would be awesome if Nothing would be included on this test, I know that it doesn't use the latest chipset but it's at least a damn good performing phone so it would be awesome to see it get compared
In a day to day usage, nothing beats the Pixel and the iPhone!
imagine kirin fighting even without google services, and it's already over a year old! hats off for huawei for a job well done!
it used to be in top 3, along bionic and snapdragon, now for me it's been replace by tensor
#kirintensorteam 🤗😙
Kirin is 2 years old but is still keeping up with new phones.
So far, A16Bionic is the most powerful chip in the world, but Redmagic 8 and Vivo x90 pro plus will soon be released with the most powerful Snapdragon 8 GEN 2 chip
O A17 também vai lançar e ganhar de todos de novo 🤣🤣🤣
A17 launches and will kick everyone's butt once again 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. Google will never rest as long as Apple exists.
Overall Rankings:
1) A16
2) SD
3) Dimensity
4) Exynos == TENSOR
6) Kirin
kirin should have higher antutu score if turn on performance mode (around 700k)
Kirin is an outdated chip at this point
@@user-hm8xh9yw5w outdated but still better than 888 8gen1 in terms of power efficiency
@@khunrocky606
Of course because it's tsmc's made chip
@@user-hm8xh9yw5w before 888 it's still better than Qualcomm
@@khunrocky606
Nah 870 is better
For 8+ gen1 the Asus rog would have been the better choice to test with
The rog phones specs are too high vs the other phones, which would give it an unfair advantage.
@@Granolora Asus can beat everybody but against Apple... I'll be very hard.
....unfortunately there wont be an Exynos next year!... but I also get much better values with the current one with some 1200/3700 on the Geekbench....
I really enjoying this comparison.
And you make a different video as always.
keep it up bro 👍
That snap 8+ doing good , wooow impressive
Thanks for your video.
But I’m curious: Isn’t the iPhone downloading files prior to convert them? It doesn’t look like the Androids are doing that. Could you explain it? Or maybe redo the test and check the results?
And in the battery test it would be better to state out the battery sizes for each device and note down the "used mAh" values for each device. This will clearly show the iPhone has much better battery efficiency.
Great high quality editing, very well put together, keep it up!
Much appreciated!
can you do this test with mid chips? so you can compare all the categories
I came here after watching previous video :)
Would like a new review with the Snapdragon 8Gen2 and Dimensity 9200
Nice comparison the remaining iphone battery would still beat the s22 though
Interesting... Seems like machine learning and optimization are what makes Apple faster. Snapdragon and Dimensity on the other hand need to work with Android and the multitude of phone brands for optimizations. 😪
Some of these benchmarks aren't really using the phones capabilities... You do a tensorflow benchmark and let it run on the cpu on the pixel. It has dedicated cores for that. If you run the proper benchmark you should get around 2200
Snap 8 gen 1 is really great but rn no phone could take me away from my pixel 6a, google support and integration in everything is a whole other thing, it just makes everything easier once you get used to it. On top it's a compact, i honestly had enough of big ass phones i can't even hold in my hand EVEN THO i can palm a basketball.
Only device that I'm willing to try is the new Zenfone 9, that shi got me hooked
I wish I could get thr zen phone 9 in the US. I also want to try a smaller form factor phone. I'm thinking about Pixel 7 but not sure if it will become a laggy mess after 6 months or so...
@@SofaKingA If u don't want it to start lagging, just disable OS updates
They do be ruining the performance
Maybe the strongest chip is the friendships we made along the way
😎
They didn't run multiple trials on the exynos clearly because I'm running a s21 fe and it score close to the tensor 2 even, and that's with the exynos 2100
Tensor catching up with the others. FOr a moment let's imagine, it was fabricated in TSMC fab, then it would have been a different game.
very informative stuff. Keep it up
Bionic A16 is good because iOS have a best recipe to make it's full performance come out.
Would have been better if you started from 100% battery and updated current change with each test
Did any of you observe in Adobe the pics processed in iPhone were different from all other phones used
Hey! The Geekbench score of the Dimensity seems off. I have Vivo X80 and have no problem in getting 1200+ on the single core and 4000+ on multi core results.
Compare chipsets on same devices like Samsung s22 ultra exynos version and snapdragon version with latest chips
Extreme test 🔥🔥😍
Snapdragon 🔥
A16 bionic 🔥
Another easy win for Apple
The 8 Gen 2 and Dimensity 9200 are coming.
D9200 already lauched
It's a great one mate👍
Thank you! Cheers!
Come on people they all knows what a A16 Bionic can do
The pictures looked different on the iPhone
Interestingly, I got a score of about 540,000 on the antutu test with the huawei p40 pro, which has an older kirin 990.
I got 570,000 with my P40 pro
@@unicsher4598 Yes, but with performance on max.
@@unicsher4598 Now it's weird that the Huawei Mate 40 Pro has this score in the video.
They don't use performance mode on huawei when they make those tests even tho huawei normal mode is to save power
@@unicsher4598 Yes, but it's still a small score for that device.
Tensor chip is basically an Exynos
Bionic the leader of all times
Wow, since many other youtube reviewers are focusing solely on geekbench 5 as a performance indicator, I genuinely thought A16 chip would obliterate snapdragon in almost every test, but I was completely wrong. It's great to be able to see the results in various applications.
geekbench is a poor measure of real performance
Even in performance, A16 still obliterates every Android Chip.
I enjoyed it! Subscribed 👍
Have an iPhone 11 and there’s no app on App Store who can make it slow. I think iPads and iPhones reach peak performance and the battle now is about performance per watt.
Can't believe how good of a video is this.almost like mrwhosetheboss levl.sad to see less views 🥺
It happens sometimes. 🥺
Tensor is Exynos special version.
why dont we have dimensity 9000+ ???
It wasn't released during the time we were shooting.
A16 💥
apple is just really ahead of its competition
thanks editor for chart
I will wrap clothes in my eyes and chose A16 over any others
Snapdragon 778 5G: Am I joke to you? why im not included?
It's a midrange chip
Looks like some of these phones weren't on performance mode but optimised mode. But to be fair I'm more intrigued at the fact tensor 2 did reasonably well. It's not the brightest spark but did alright here. And my pixel 7 pro is faster and smoother than my iPhone 14 pro max. This shows raw power isn't everything. Very similar to putting a jet engine on a tricycle.
Snapdragon 8+ gen 1 the beast🔥
Great Video! Keep it up brother. 🙂👍
Apple Master Race laughing at Android poors
Owened and produced by China. Meaning asia right? Right? 😏
The test is really only relevant across the android devices, too many other variables when trying to compare iOS (operating system, app optimisation etc)
شكرًا على المقارنة الرائعة ناقص المقطع اضافة الترجمة للغة العربية
there must be something wrong with your s22 ultra, i just did a geekbench 5 test, 1163 single and 3388 for multi..
We know that iOS have the optimized applications, but is not a BATTERYPHONE like somebody said.
I don't understand why Samsung put in EU devices the Exynos processor. I have the S22 Ultra and it is a machine. I have the EU version with Exynos but I don't have any problem with this phone, but Snapdragon version is better. When I need POWER I use the MAX MODE and, trust me, is really really really fast.
Qualcomm version aren't better
why are you surprised the battery wasn't the best? the android phones had a 5000 mah battery while the iphone 14 pro had a 3200mah battery. He shouldve compared the pro max which has a more comparable battery
These phones are more powerful than my main PC lol
Feel myself ripped off by Samsung because of my S22+ with Exynos : Same price, but far less powerful thant their Snapdragon version, and no choice because in EU area...
Hope that some futur updates will optimize Exynos.
Don't feel ripped, Your S22 Exynos version are far more efficient and powerful than Qualcomm, a lot to S22 Qualcomm users complain about battery
@@androidoneiu5206 🙄 Damn bro... Wtf are u smokin?! Did you even watch the video? Exynos is pure garbage, it was behind almost everything...
@@bigcdub and kirin was worse with tensor, same with Mediatek were pure garbage, stop smoking
@@androidoneiu5206 Only one smoking here is you Exynos Fanboi, I own S22U (SD), and 13PM, I would never own garbage Exynos or Kirin junk, nobody wants Exynos which is a failure year after year, or that Kirin Junk...
@@bigcdub You're very drunken, You never have tried Exynos, but in my experience being a Samsung and iPhone user I could say that Exynos is excellent, "nobody wants Exynos", maybe you and the minority.
S23 will be in Snapdragon only then this will be a fair test, can't wait for your S23 videos!
S22 Exynos is excellent, second rumors are rumors and Samsung has the last decision
@@androidoneiu5206 excellent in what its always drawback, why you guys having stone minded 🤦♂️
@@archie7288 it's failing excellently in Adobe Rush :) or it failing excellently in multiple apps against the more than 2 years old Kirin 9000. Just leave that guy, he is a blind Samsung fanboy, you never can convince that who can't even spell properly the One UI (Samsung crying in the corner, because this guy love them).
@@randomcomment9992 Stop the lies, everyone with a little of knowledge would knows that in Adobe Rush the Exynos 2200 can't export thanks to lack of optimization for the RdNa GPU, Exynos is excellent in maintain sustained performance, kirin, tensor and Mediatek falls behind :)
@@archie7288 isn't a drawback, is more efficient and powerful
I thought Samsung was going to get rid of exynos on the new s23
Exynos 2300 exists...
Nice content man
Glad you enjoyed!
With the results, came with the price of each chips hahahaha
Weird, on my Vivo X80 (Dimensity 9000), i got 1*** on single core, and 4*** on multi cores scores in Geekbench 5..also in antutu i got over 1 mil score..maybe the oppo don't really optimized with the chip.
If only this test could be done with each cpu running the same os
Kirin already 2 years old
A16 bionic best processor it rocks. I am keeping the iPhone 14 Pro max. bye!