CLEAR WINNER!! TaylorMade P790 v’s Ping i530

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 мар 2024
  • #matthewgalleygolf #golf #golfclub
    This week I compare two of the leading hollow body irons in the form of the TaylorMade P790 against the Ping i530. These are both an ‘all round’ iron where manufacturers aim to combine distance and forgiveness with looks and feel.
    I compare distance, spin, launch, ball speed and much more using a TrackMan 4.
    Enjoy the watch, like and subscribe if you are enjoying the content!
    SUBSCRIBE - / @matthewgalleygolf
    ONLINE COACHING: skillest.com/app/profile/matt...
    Use Code: MATT25 for 25% off
    Watch this next:
    1. TaylorMade QI Iron - FULL REVIEW
    • TaylorMade QI Iron - F...
    2. Ping have done it again! i530 Review
    • Ping have done it agai...
    #matthewgalleygolf #golf #clubreviews
    Instagram: @matthewgalleygolf
    Twitter: @MGalleyPGAPro
    Facebook: Matthew Galley Golf
    Website: www.matthewgalleygolf.co.uk
    Email: matthewgalleygolf@gmail.com
  • СпортСпорт

Комментарии • 38

  • @leeloopatsy
    @leeloopatsy 2 месяца назад +7

    For me the most important thing is control and trajectory with as little dispersion as possible. The distance is a plus. But provided you can control it, if the balls go all over the place then it is of no interest. Besides, going 150 yards with a 9 iron or a 7 or a 5 is of no importance. What matters is to know which iron you must use to be able to cover this distance and have balls that are always more or less in the middle of the fairway and/or green. This is why I chose the retro loft i530.

  • @Teamtimp88
    @Teamtimp88 2 месяца назад +9

    Would love to see the spin rates with an 8 iron (i530), guessing same spin as the P790 7 iron…same same, would rather hit an eight into the green as opposed to a seven iron

  • @bobbygoodman2875
    @bobbygoodman2875 3 месяца назад +8

    I believe you can get the Pings in retro-spec (more loft).

  • @Skye_the_toller
    @Skye_the_toller 3 месяца назад +4

    I had the p790.. I liked it, but the gap was quite difficult to adjust… if the Ping are longer… it will be worst!!! I still like my I230… one + club shorter, but more « predictable » trajectory… consistent.

  • @nataliedeyton6829
    @nataliedeyton6829 3 месяца назад +6

    I was fitted last weekend and the i530 and the ZX4 I hit great .. both were absolutely the same for me .. went with the pings but it was a personal preference

  • @atamagashock
    @atamagashock 2 месяца назад +2

    These comparisons should be done with the same loft. I’d like to see the difference in spin and distance if they both played at 30.5. I think they would play a lot closer. I’m personally not a fan of all these sets with such strong lofts. At 29 degrees that’s a 6 iron not a 7. So that alone changes the numbers. You should see more distance, lower spin numbers, less height.
    I’m going on Sunday for an iron fitting and I’m looking into the players distance category. But I’ve played a 33 degree 7 iron for so long now, I’m just used to it. I don’t mind a slightly stronger lofted 7, but the 790s 30.5 is sbout as strong as I’d want. Really I’m hoping to go 1 or 2 degrees weak, but I guess we will see how it all plays out on Sunday.

  • @rickylee3161
    @rickylee3161 3 месяца назад +2

    Genuinely surprised such difference with the distance. I played the i525 and it’s never the longest.

  • @peterbuzz7279
    @peterbuzz7279 3 месяца назад +3

    Interesting outcome, wasn't expecting the one club difference in distance with the ping.
    I would still prefer to be hitting the ping 8 iron instead of the P790 7 iron.

  • @LeslieGreenwood-bu9tn
    @LeslieGreenwood-bu9tn 2 месяца назад

    I went with PXG 0311 P because looks , sound , feel , sensible distance , gerat spin numbers & the front to back dispersion is the best I've ever had, oh & the TT elevate shafts.

  • @joeclaman9186
    @joeclaman9186 29 дней назад

    How much impact to spin and land angle do you get with retro loft?

  • @robertshields6214
    @robertshields6214 3 месяца назад +7

    Cant this all be attributed to the stronger loft in the Ping?

  • @JOSEGPH2018
    @JOSEGPH2018 2 месяца назад

    Distance only with the driver, te rest must to be focused on controll.
    The number is only to now what club to choice each time.

  • @CatNash007
    @CatNash007 2 месяца назад +1

    The retro spec loft for the Ping would have been more of an apples to apples comparison.

  • @Grunt21Tennessee
    @Grunt21Tennessee 3 месяца назад +1

    Great review!

  • @2tcreative
    @2tcreative Месяц назад

    Where you are hitting a 7 iron with the P790 you would drop down a club (8 iron?) with the i530, which might bring the spin rate more in line with what you want. Distance withe the i530 8 iron might even be slightly longer if those numbers hold up. Was this the power spec or traditional?

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  Месяц назад

      These were standard lofts, yes launch and spin would increase with 8 iron and distance would drop, but most likely still a little longer that P790 8 iron

  • @paulmcgee1867
    @paulmcgee1867 3 месяца назад +1

    Both could be said to have won. It all depends on what the expectations are

  • @thatwilldonicely1314
    @thatwilldonicely1314 2 месяца назад

    hi im a 18 handicapper, could i play with those pings ? or are they to 'difficult' for me? cheers

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  2 месяца назад

      More than likely they’ll be forgiving enough but you need to try them. G430 will offer you more forgiveness in Ping range

  • @CatNash007
    @CatNash007 2 месяца назад

    Standard loft of i530 is same as Power Spec of i525…jacked!

  • @ratbastard4443
    @ratbastard4443 2 месяца назад +2

    Just curious, Were you using the same shaft for both of these??

  • @nachanokr9198
    @nachanokr9198 2 месяца назад

    your Ping I530 data from the club own reviewed and this comparison is way different. In your Ping I 530 review 7 iron spin rate was average 5600 here is 4400. Wonder why such a big gap in the same iron.

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  2 месяца назад

      A combination of ‘human’ element and nature of the club

  • @waywardwest
    @waywardwest Месяц назад +1

    I would take the i530 with retro lofts. The number on the club is irrelevant. Ping has always produced clubs with consistent yardage gaps between clubs. As a lower handicap player I want to know I have a bag of clubs that cover all the yardages not the irons I can brag about hitting my 7 iron 190 yards.

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  Месяц назад +1

      They are so good and retro lofts would help gap the wedges

  • @OSS976
    @OSS976 2 месяца назад +1

    “Clear winner” … proceeds to say he likes TM more but it depends lol

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  2 месяца назад

      Better for my game but if you want more distance then Ping is the answer 🔥

  • @JOSEGPH2018
    @JOSEGPH2018 2 месяца назад +2

    The choice is , distance the Ping, controll the Taylor.
    Easy !! 😂

  • @chrisb.4496
    @chrisb.4496 Месяц назад

    In the search for distance, companies and new golfers have actually backed themselves into a corner...

  • @dickbroomer7877
    @dickbroomer7877 2 месяца назад

    Hi Matt nice review👍 a couple of questions Didn’t hear you mention the lofts are they the same? (& what lofts are they) I think you can get the Ping in std, retro, & power lofts, if this is so you could get the Pings 2deg weaker lofted (just a suggestion), which would increase the spin , great ball striking Matt, can you give us a bit more info on feel and sound and ball control (shot shaping) Thanks Dickey 9hcp 76year senior golfer

    • @MatthewGalleyGolf
      @MatthewGalleyGolf  2 месяца назад +1

      Hi Dickie,
      The i530’s are 1.5 degrees stronger and yes higher/weaker lofts will increase spin. I prefer the feel and sound of the P790’s, shot shaping easier with P790’s