+Michael J. Caboose this video posting is distributing ignorance and preventing it is a good thing. u kinda supported my arguement with that line buddy
I'll say, fine speech! She should've really mentioned nuclear energy, though. Or at least realize some problems with trying to move to fully renewable energy, she made it sound as if it's the obvious choice and that we've been stupid to not have done it yet.
+Anston Music Solar power produces more than nuclear in total (if you look at how much area they require). So if you want to build a nuclear plant, you can just build a solar station instead and have less space used.
Jon Wise I really like the potential of solar power too, but there is the problem that we still can't really store energy, so if we had most of our electricity using solar energy we could have a power shortages during nights, dark and cloudy days and in the north: winters. It's a bit unreliable and doesn't work everywhere. I live in Finland for example, and it'd be difficult to produce solar power effectively here. Besides, I don't think that area thing is really correct, could you elaborate? Otherwise I'm all for solar power.
Anston Music About area.. I heard that Elon Musk saying in a conversation with the energy minister of Germany. You have to factor in that Nuclear plants besides themselves have exclusion zones and solar panels don't need any geographical buffer around them. 1 square km of 100 solar efficiency is one gigawatt hour. This means 5 square km are 1 gigawatt hour at 20% efficiency. As for storing, Tesla currently making some innovation in this space. They already have powerpack which can store relatively large amount of energy are getting experimented with by big companies like Amazon and they have powerwall for users. Yes, they don't cost that cheap, but it's still a solution.
What struck me most was that the developed countries have fully benefitted from fossil fuels and other unhealth emissions and are now heavily advocating for use of clean energy methods leaving the undeveloped countries behind a step.
You might think that a lot of ppl are downvoting this because it's about climate change, or because she's a woman and she's talking (as a white male this triggers me omg!). But people might actually be *downvoting it because she's a famous politician*. She was president of Ireland. Seriously, look at all the other TED talks with politicians, they get voted down pretty hard. Politics always attracts a cloud of hate along for the ride. I think i much prefer this being the reason people are hating on her, rather than the alternatives mentioned above. edit: oh, it's TEDwomen. Yeah ok that's probably the reason it's being downvoted, i'm convinced that people have votebots triggered by any mentioned on TEDwomen.
+Rikortez It's just curiosity, I never watched the video and therefore couldn't judge its content. Sadly that's because I can't put up with any kind of climate change video anymore. Activism and scepticism both have good points, and there is no reasonable way for me to judge which information is objective,accurate and representative. And being convinced of anything to a religious level never can be good.
Yes it's from people who aren't just accepting lies as facts, you see a lot of that right now in 2020, people beiieving lies and they happy to stay at home, masks on their faces breathing in their own carbon dioxide, now they're busy protesting for blm another pysop. Soon there's going to be another lock down... maybe this time we;; all have to crawl to be safe from a virus which hovers 3 feet above the ground..
yeah cuz the idea that climate change is caused by carbon is stupid and has no scientific evidence. look up climategate and you'll see that the same scientist that proposed this have investing in it and never released the Raw data.
+Alex Curtis lmao you resort to insults with noe evidence. evolution isnt real. where is the monkey/ human mix? but thats for another day. look up climategate and youll see these scientists are deathly afraid of relaesing their raw data. climate change happens normally. its the cycles of the planet. and that how we had ice ages before. dont be daft and do your own research.
+Alex Curtis thats a blatent lie!! 99% my Brown Culo. more like 65% 20% are silent on the issue for fear of public shaming and there are only a few scientist that cant be bought or feared into it.
Seriously, we will need a substantially new way of thinking if humanity is to survive on this earth for years to come. If we deny climate change and don’t care about environmental degradation; we are no more than those people who are willing to be stupid because someone else was stupid in the past. All i'm saying is Actions speaks louder than words, countries must do something before it's too late.
20 minutes in and already 16 dislikes. _I wonder why_. Chauvinism has to stop. All the man children here can't stand being educated by a *_gorgeous_* and *_intelligent_* woman. Sort out your subscribers, _Little Think_. Kind Regards, Wyatt Nite
+Wyatt Nite Heh, we meet again. This is quite a decent speech though, all in all. Some obscure remarks here and there and some things left unmentioned to keep the agenda clear, but you couldn't hope for more from this kind of speech.
educate yourself on climate change and climate gate. look at the raw data and how many differnet labs have been caught skewing data to support their claims. i dont need to watch this to know its a blue. cuz when someone tells me the sky is red when its clearly blue i use my own discernment.
Kevin Jaquez I've been frustrated by this guy before, see that his name is "White Knight", he's a troll, and a funny one at that! But I don't get what you're trying to say, are you claiming that climate change is a hoax?
Responsibility, accountability, and altruism for others beyond self interests ...mostly people don't like being told what to do especially if feeling prejudice or bigotry over something. Doesn't surprise me that so many would dislike a video they would never watch. Also it doesn't surprise me feelings of human rights, poverty, science, climate change, conspiracy opinions, and of a majority. Will humans adapt as a whole? We shall see.
Jennifer Isaacs conspiracy opinions, try conspiracy FACT easy to call it opinion if you've not watched the skies for five decades isn't it, when you've' basically been brainwashed by a common core indoctrination you call education to believe in climate change when the weather and climate is in fact being engineered, purposeful, maybe you're studying to be one of the many who reap benefits from pushing an agenda, the deceivers.
+Vincent Reich When the Eldritch deities take over the planet you'll understand the roll humans play and why they shouldn't expect anything as rightfully theirs. #ChtuhluforPresident2016
+Vincent Reich Her argument is that climate change is bad because it infringes upon the rights of resources (food,water, etc)... even assuming global climate change, without labeling resources as human rights she doesn't have a rational argument.
I am fortunate enough to live in a big city in India. I would prefer to go through public transport any for my job. However I don't. Cuz the public transport is pathetic, there's barely a place to keep my foot. The frequency of vehicles is quite less and they are never punctual. I blame my government for this. Even if people want to use public transport, so that they can save some money. They can't because of the pathetic services provided by government.
+Eric21ND I completely agree. But what about the services we rely on? Atleast they have to be acceptable. Just look at the documentary for "local trains in Mumbai" & you will get the clear picture of what I am talking about. If the public transport was average, I would have loved to travel by it. Atleast the government in my area should increase the frequency. So that there's some leg space. Trust me if I prefer public transport, I can save upto more than 80% of cash from which I am currently spending on commute to work.
we need to sort out the agricultural situation first. it's the most destructive and disruptive force against nature and the climate. but people keep there mouth shut about that because they don't want to upset the meat eaters.
+Jack Edwards Many do not keep their mouth shut. People who are hooked don't want to hear about it, though. A kind of drug use, with the same old effects. Premature death, significantly lowered quality of life while the decline is in progress, cost society a lot of money... not throwing offenders in prison yet to cure them of their behavior yet, that I know of.
watercup123456 Plant based food is more energy efficient (a LOT more), causes less mass extinction of all life, is better for human health, leads to a lot less land use, stops killing all life in the oceans, reduces the use of antibiotics (80%+) and thus resistance, reduces the development of pandemics (SARS, MERS, Ebola, AIDS, Bird Flu, Swine Flu, etc)... sounds like you lack a relevant university degree, most likely. There are zero benefits in including animal based foods in ones diet, unless to stave off immediate starvation or similar, until one can eat real food again.
@@JakEddzTransmitting Wrong eating meat is not a drug, it's sustenance. What is a drug is your incessant brainwashing pick on livestock but millions of miles of bleating corn grown for ethanol and bio fuels via gmo corn at that is okay. Livestock manure enriches the soil, small farmers offer a great service to man and earth. And you idiot Maxander2001 with your stupid comment "Premature death, significantly lowered quality" brainwashed or UN parrots or also PETA shills?
“For the last hundred years, the ocean has risen 20 cm - but for the previous hundred years the ocean also has risen 20 cm and for the last 300 years, the ocean has also risen 20 cm per 100 years. So there is no unusual rise in sea level. And to be sure you understand that I will repeat it. There is no unusual rise in sea level,” Giaever said. - Nobel prize winner
When she started talking about men, woman and equality I lost any interest in the video. Social justice warriors, you won, no matter what's the subject of the video, you will be there.
*+João Vicente* It's unfortunate this trend is a constant these days. 9:20 is insulting, considering how many boys and men die each year mining, logging, pumping the fuels that these poor women inhale in their homes.
Adrian Reminds me of a great quot from miss Hilary Clinton: "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat"
It is far easier to terrorise common people with climate hoax than big companies. They know how to avoid stupid laws. Common people have no chance to do so.
I subscribed to this channel to see some new ideas and broaden my horizons. 90% of what i see on here now is just a big circle jerk where "Oh we all think the same!" I think its clear to see that anyone who disagrees with the main point are resisting these opinions wholeheartedly. Bring something fresh, teach me something new.
+Jim Quinlan All this talk of rights to land, shelter, food, water but ignore the rights of the people who would have to provide all these things, you know, for "free." Why are people listening to politicians anyway?
+banphrionsa Fantásía I appreciate that. But, when you ignore science to promote your position, as she does here, then you should not be taken seriously.
***** There's no debate? The people of Europe just believe what they read? And this is some how better? lol I seriously doubt "every educated person has examined the evidence." What's more likely is that they consumed someone else's interpretation and opinion of the material. Also, No True Scottsman fallacy.
***** So those who have read the material and have rejected it in some fashion are then educated meaning your statement "because every educated person has already examined the evidence beforehand" is hollow. Your statement is tautological. I seriously doubt that everyone who has read the "scientific articles" (and by your definition are now educated) agrees with the conclusion that global warming (Whatever that term is supposed to mean this week) is man-made, non-cyclical, etc. This is where the debate is... sort of: "educated" people disagree with the method or the conclusion thereby bringing the matter to debate. There are scientists who do not agree with the "concensus." In fact, there are scientists who's work has been misinterpreted to support anthropogentic global warming. These scientists have tried to speak out but get silenced or ignored.
"I wasn't really impressed by the images of polar bears. It was because of the impact on people and their rights"... human rights are important, but don't let it turn into speciecism...
“When government muzzles scientists for political reasons, it cuts at the fundamental principals of good science,” said Stephen Hwang, professor of general internal medicine at the University of Toronto.
Why is that? Is it because you don't know the weather and climate is actually controlled and engineered? Because you don't know that you, we all are breathing in nano particles from the aerosols they spray in our air which are in the so called "green" bio fuel? I think that may be why you love her, and others like her.
The powers that be are modifying the weather and climate and have been for decades. It's all planned and intentional terraforming earth. We've been inhaling sensors for years via the aerosols they spray. Look at climateviewer . com and weathermodification history dot com.
@@roberthicks1612 oh, hmm were you on earth 100 yrs ago no, but some of use have been here for longer than you have say 60yrs when the skies where a clear deep dark blue and pale and not full of lines and plasma clouds and nano particles and so sorry but the climate is controlled by local weather when the weather is controlled globally it's affects the climate when the jet stream can be manipulated through the use of microwaves that can and does create droughts and floods,. Criminals get away with crimes because there are too many indifferent and or brainwashed humans on earth.
@@RosyOutlook2 No, but I know how to read science journals. I was here 60 years ago, and so I know the pollution was worse in the 1980's and 1990's than they are now. Nor did the pollution start then. You must be looking back with rose colored glasses because there was a lot of push for clean air in the 1960's. In order to have climate control, there has to be evidence that the climate change has happened. There is no scientific evidence that the climate has change in any way that is not natural. Go ahead and believe your religion, but there is no science to back it up.
Don't you fkn DARE talk about Climate Change & Human Rights when you are one of the most notorious criminal offenders on the planet when it comes to Human Rights & Climate Change, just like the rest of your Organised Crime & Terrorist Gang...
When did TED talks stop being about science and more about backing social issues with science; That isn't to say I think global warming isn't very real issue(it fugging is!) but rather in previous years TED was mostly about what was happening in science, how it was improving the lives of people, helping the planet; the concrete improvements that the sciences are bringing about. Now it seems 2/3 talks pertain to some person or another's opinion on the abstract of social problems.
When all the common core indoctrinated X gen got their smart phones and they realizes they could brainwash them to beg for their own & the entire western world's downfall making Agenda21's job that much easier. The weather is controlled globally with science and technology, which liars will never disclose, they instead say " we need to save earth and geoengineer the planet " " We need to dump sulphur and aluminum nano particles and millions may die" but oh well look up WeatherModificationHistory. com and climateviewer
I'm a moral realist, I think rights are to be derived from observing actual best practices for win/win human interaction. Politics is just bullshit. TED isn't supposed to be about politics, hence no 'P' in the acronym.
You think you can calculate the optimal parameters, is that what you're saying? Technocracy fails at this part, as you can't predict the outcome of a chaotic system, especially when it is this big. Not even the Illuminati have cracked the code on this at the moment.
TheAnnoyingGunner I think we can observe what truths are available to us with current technology and do our best. Strict philosophical (logical & objective) arguments are also quite useful in this regard. It's not an all-or-nothing proposition. We also have a historical record which strongly suggests that cultures which prize individual freedom advance quickly to the benefit of all.
***** That's not an argument. I'd be happy to discuss the possibilities of free will and individual freedom, but you'd have to stop trolling and actually state your objections.
+Kevin Jaquez As if noone have ever given you a link to NASA or IPCC and you have dismissed it outright because it does not match your worldview. If you have not bothered googling "NASA raw data" yourself can you honestly say that you have any actual interest in the raw data?
willie quarton um.. that too, but that's not what I meant. I meant the tax revenue from a carbon tax should be used to subsidize renewable energy and things that use renewable energy.
of course by bombing the terrorists: theintercept.com/2015/10/05/the-radically-changing-story-of-the-u-s-airstrike-on-afghan-hospital-from-mistake-to-justification/
What about attacking animal agriculture? Why does no one talk about the carbon emissions that comes from animal agriculture and why are we not tackling it when it is reportedly the number 1 cause to climate change?
We are the ones who caused this, we are the ones who will pay the price, the poor, the rich, everyone. There's no one else to blame but us. The thing that matters is whether we decide to fix this. But from now up until that point, we suffer,
@@nguyencaotri3879 Duh. No I did not cause this spider boy, weather and climate engineering caused this, sending rockets and satellites into space caused this. Earth don't need rights you brainwashed child.
@@Elladajosie 1st it's not thousands, that's already a bleating lie, most of the IPCC is not science it's governmental, and that's right wrong and a LIE. The weather and climate is engineered, and it has been for decades, well before were born, you'd know that if you didn't have your mind brainwashed by the UN and the IPCC's thousands of cronies . WeatherModificationHistory. com Climateviewer. com. " Weather Modification Using Electromagnetic Beams common knowledge at Aquiess,Inc.SD" "Owning the Weather" "Project Popeye" "Project Cirrus" " Weather and Climate Modification - National Science Foundation" 'Weather modification operations in California,' June 1955." "S. 3383 (94th): National Weather Modification Policy Act Introduced: May 5, 1976 94th Congress, 1975-1976 Status:Enacted" "S.517 - Weather Modification Research and Development Policy Authorization Act" " NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL OD-14 Office of the Director Boulder, Colorado May 1972 Cumulus Clouds And Their Modification" "Why Big Oil Conquered the World"
The biggest problem, to me at least, the seemingly hardest choice that seems to be: If we carry on growing econmically, we put out selves in ever more danger from climate change. However, in order to reduce climate change to under 2 degrees, we effectively have to plundge ourselves into poverty. And we are just so close to ending poverty. In the 15 years, there will be no poor countries. So we either get grower riches and the planet warms up, or, we reduce the change but we're all poor. Either way, we're fucked. Another thing: Why do we call it mother earth? Why are there people who asume that nature is a conscious, real thing?
+Malcolm Pagett We don't have to plunge ourselves into poverty to reduce CO2 Emissions. Even with current technology we could have 50% renewables + 50% nuclear at a reasonable price. The price of solar is on an exponential curve, just like microprocessors. "mother earth" is just an expression. lol.
Human induce climate changed directly affected a bad crops event in a village in Uganda? You have any scientific backing on that extraordinary claim? Do you realize how many "bad crops" there where in human history long before CO2 emission machines where even a thing? I'm sorry, but this lady is just making assumptions without bases.
although human CO2 emissions are a big problem, it is far from the biggest fish to fry on this. CO2 is useful for crops, it needs to be in the right places (such as not over the ocean), and we will need CO2 to provide food because of the changing weather cycles. many old farms will drought, many will flood, those that are left must be able to provide enough food for the populations. we will have to actively cool the world by blocking sunlight, this will require us to go to space and move celestial objects. a geosynchronous asteroid or 10,000 will be needed to help block out the growing sunlight. don't think it has to do with the sun? go ahead and explain the changing weather on the other planets then. we aren't polluting jupiter.
Mary Robinson, I had the privilege to drive you & husband from Limerick train station to Motel on Dublin rd I wanted to ask Mr. Robinson if we were related My family is Casey+ Robinson Relations in the north I have never met I am going back to Steve Coughlan period in Limerick if you or Mr. Robinson could reply please, My Gran always said MR Robinson was related Family in England I have never met Lady you are beautiful A Irish woman.
Climate change is a physical reality, that is and will continue to destroy vast numbers of species, and the way we are going, us as well. Human rights is a concept only, an assertion of our superior condition, and is a gross conceit. Not offered to the other species we destroy and enslave. Personally, I am unconcerned with human rights; my concern is the continuation of all life, and not the gross murder by our gross arrogance.
You've been well brainwashed to hate humans eh, well indoctrinated, vegan I bet and common core schooled, watch cowspriacy, fork over knifes and a slew of rubbish, look down at your phone a lot I bet but never up at the skies or you may know the weather and climate is engineered and has been since before your mummy was born. Have not a clue the skies should be a clear deep dark blue and not the millennium pale blue and white crap you were born under, your parents didn't pay any attention either, so they didn't teach you squat. And not surprising for a cc shill. Your channel doesn't have any content
How did this old woman get to this conference? Did she walk or cycle a bike? Doubt it. I'd say she was driven to the airport. I'd say she flew to California . I'd say she had a car waiting for her at the airport. I'd say she has a carbon footprint that is more than thousands of families combined. I'd say she is a multi millionaire. I'd say the burning of fossil fuels paid a huge part in her wealth creation. I'd say she got handsomely rewarded for this speech. She is a complete hypocrite. If she was genuinely worried about climate change and leaving the poor of the world behind couldn't she have given her speech through Skype? A joke.
People wach Program about Dubai’s missing princess Latifa. This Mary so calld Humen Wright protecter HANDElD absolutely WRONG in HER Case. SHAME on HER.
Awwww... I thought that climate alarmism has been burried for good after all the lies and the forgeries that have been exposed. But there seems to be a bunch of extremists that still hasn't given up on the idea to tax (carbon based) life itself. My advice: First, get the science straight, stop lying, stop insulting sceptics. If there will be a case left for carbon reduction (what I doubt) - come up with proposals that don't push millions of people into poverty.
How riddled this is with Internal contradictions is kinda miraculous. Yet, the seals clap in unison and on command. Climate related deaths have shrunk by 92 percent over the last century lady, BECAUSE of fossil fuels. Once technology develops that can match the output potential of fossil fuels, I promise you we will transitions. Till then, the fossil fuel show goes on.
Such a boring speech because it lacks real concrete examples. This is the weakness of 9 out of 10 speeches on TED Talk. Without concrete, descriptive examples, not only would professors fail you on your report or speeches, but you just come out with a vague, time-waster, general, dehumanizing speech.
Very few people know about her...but she was real human right rockstar of those old days.
Oh god. Don't read the comments. If you see this, you have found the comments, FOR GOD'S SAKES SAVE YOURSELF AND SCROLL BACK UP
+Lee O only doing yourself a disservice. ingnorance is NOT Bliss
+Lee O
You can't escape the Illuminati. We are everywhere.
+Michael J. Caboose this video posting is distributing ignorance and preventing it is a good thing. u kinda supported my arguement with that line buddy
+Michael J. Caboose I take your advice, and because I take it I'll never know whether it was good advice or not. Thanks anyway :P
+Michael J. Caboose Thank you for the warning.
I will happily accept it.
I'll say, fine speech!
She should've really mentioned nuclear energy, though.
Or at least realize some problems with trying to move to fully renewable energy, she made it sound as if it's the obvious choice and that we've been stupid to not have done it yet.
+Anston Music You said that 16 minutes ago. This video was released 17 minutes ago. It's 21 minutes long.
...
+Victor G Nope, if you can read, you'll see that the comment has been modified. I had just an "ookay" there as a placeholder.
+Anston Music Solar power produces more than nuclear in total (if you look at how much area they require). So if you want to build a nuclear plant, you can just build a solar station instead and have less space used.
Jon Wise I really like the potential of solar power too, but there is the problem that we still can't really store energy, so if we had most of our electricity using solar energy we could have a power shortages during nights, dark and cloudy days and in the north: winters. It's a bit unreliable and doesn't work everywhere. I live in Finland for example, and it'd be difficult to produce solar power effectively here. Besides, I don't think that area thing is really correct, could you elaborate?
Otherwise I'm all for solar power.
Anston Music
About area.. I heard that Elon Musk saying in a conversation with the energy minister of Germany. You have to factor in that Nuclear plants besides themselves have exclusion zones and solar panels don't need any geographical buffer around them. 1 square km of 100 solar efficiency is one gigawatt hour. This means 5 square km are 1 gigawatt hour at 20% efficiency. As for storing, Tesla currently making some innovation in this space. They already have powerpack which can store relatively large amount of energy are getting experimented with by big companies like Amazon and they have powerwall for users. Yes, they don't cost that cheap, but it's still a solution.
What an inspiration, a woman of real substance and a living legend. Meas mór!
What struck me most was that the developed countries have fully benefitted from fossil fuels and other unhealth emissions and are now heavily advocating for use of clean energy methods leaving the undeveloped countries behind a step.
You might think that a lot of ppl are downvoting this because it's about climate change, or because she's a woman and she's talking (as a white male this triggers me omg!). But people might actually be *downvoting it because she's a famous politician*. She was president of Ireland.
Seriously, look at all the other TED talks with politicians, they get voted down pretty hard. Politics always attracts a cloud of hate along for the ride. I think i much prefer this being the reason people are hating on her, rather than the alternatives mentioned above.
edit: oh, it's TEDwomen. Yeah ok that's probably the reason it's being downvoted, i'm convinced that people have votebots triggered by any mentioned on TEDwomen.
Purely based on this speech, if there was a leader named to lead the entire earth, I'd vote for Mary Robinson.
im sure youll settle for the anti-Christ too huh?
I don't believe in such things as religion, so I tend to answer 'no'.
I just came here to see if my guess about the dislikes on this was correct.
+MegtaBubble Confirmation bias much?
+MegtaBubble Turns out we guessed right.
+Rikortez It's just curiosity, I never watched the video and therefore couldn't judge its content. Sadly that's because I can't put up with any kind of climate change video anymore. Activism and scepticism both have good points, and there is no reasonable way for me to judge which information is objective,accurate and representative. And being convinced of anything to a religious level never can be good.
Yes it's from people who aren't just accepting lies as facts, you see a lot of that right now in 2020, people beiieving lies and they happy to stay at home, masks on their faces breathing in their own carbon dioxide, now they're busy protesting for blm another pysop. Soon there's going to be another lock down... maybe this time we;; all have to crawl to be safe from a virus which hovers 3 feet above the ground..
I'm leaving these tags for myself. 5:47 6:45 7:47 8:01
14 dislikes before anyone could have possibly even watched the video..
yeah cuz the idea that climate change is caused by carbon is stupid and has no scientific evidence. look up climategate and you'll see that the same scientist that proposed this have investing in it and never released the Raw data.
+Alex Curtis lmao you resort to insults with noe evidence. evolution isnt real. where is the monkey/ human mix? but thats for another day. look up climategate and youll see these scientists are deathly afraid of relaesing their raw data. climate change happens normally. its the cycles of the planet. and that how we had ice ages before. dont be daft and do your own research.
+Alex Curtis thats a blatent lie!! 99% my Brown Culo. more like 65% 20% are silent on the issue for fear of public shaming and there are only a few scientist that cant be bought or feared into it.
+Rand Huso where is the missing link? stop nit picking the small things and show me the raw data that shows man has a major role in climate change.
+Rand Huso Paid Troll
Seriously, we will need a substantially new way of thinking if humanity is to survive on this earth for years to come. If we deny climate change and don’t care about environmental degradation; we are no more than those people who are willing to be stupid because someone else was stupid in the past. All i'm saying is Actions speaks louder than words, countries must do something before it's too late.
Wake up the whole climate farce is a wealth distribution plan.
Bs
20 minutes in and already 16 dislikes. _I wonder why_.
Chauvinism has to stop. All the man children here can't stand being educated by a *_gorgeous_* and *_intelligent_* woman. Sort out your subscribers, _Little Think_.
Kind Regards,
Wyatt Nite
+Wyatt Nite
Heh, we meet again. This is quite a decent speech though, all in all.
Some obscure remarks here and there and some things left unmentioned to keep the agenda clear, but you couldn't hope for more from this kind of speech.
educate yourself on climate change and climate gate. look at the raw data and how many differnet labs have been caught skewing data to support their claims. i dont need to watch this to know its a blue. cuz when someone tells me the sky is red when its clearly blue i use my own discernment.
Kevin Jaquez I bet you watch FGM videos for entertainment.
Kind Regards,
Wyatt Nite
Kevin Jaquez I've been frustrated by this guy before, see that his name is "White Knight", he's a troll, and a funny one at that! But I don't get what you're trying to say, are you claiming that climate change is a hoax?
+Wyatt Nite Dr. Ivar Giaever look up his position and then try to insult
This brightened my day.
Brilliant talk.
Responsibility, accountability, and altruism for others beyond self interests ...mostly people don't like being told what to do especially if feeling prejudice or bigotry over something. Doesn't surprise me that so many would dislike a video they would never watch. Also it doesn't surprise me feelings of human rights, poverty, science, climate change, conspiracy opinions, and of a majority. Will humans adapt as a whole? We shall see.
Jennifer Isaacs conspiracy opinions, try conspiracy FACT easy to call it opinion if you've not watched the skies for five decades isn't it, when you've' basically been brainwashed by a common core indoctrination you call education to believe in climate change when the weather and climate is in fact being engineered, purposeful, maybe you're studying to be one of the many who reap benefits from pushing an agenda, the deceivers.
Thanks
I TOTALLY AGREE!
That is the consequences of labeling resources as human rights. Humans should not reasonably expect any resources as a "right".
+FTWSkillDrain what? haha lol
+Vincent Reich When the Eldritch deities take over the planet you'll understand the roll humans play and why they shouldn't expect anything as rightfully theirs. #ChtuhluforPresident2016
+Vincent Reich Her argument is that climate change is bad because it infringes upon the rights of resources (food,water, etc)... even assuming global climate change, without labeling resources as human rights she doesn't have a rational argument.
+banphrionsa Fantásía Just because I feel that I need a resource does not mean I have a right to it.
I am fortunate enough to live in a big city in India. I would prefer to go through public transport any for my job. However I don't. Cuz the public transport is pathetic, there's barely a place to keep my foot. The frequency of vehicles is quite less and they are never punctual. I blame my government for this. Even if people want to use public transport, so that they can save some money. They can't because of the pathetic services provided by government.
+Tariq Mulla Don't rely upon government to save you.
+Eric21ND
I completely agree. But what about the services we rely on? Atleast they have to be acceptable. Just look at the documentary for "local trains in Mumbai" & you will get the clear picture of what I am talking about.
If the public transport was average, I would have loved to travel by it. Atleast the government in my area should increase the frequency. So that there's some leg space. Trust me if I prefer public transport, I can save upto more than 80% of cash from which I am currently spending on commute to work.
Very good video!
we need to sort out the agricultural situation first. it's the most destructive and disruptive force against nature and the climate. but people keep there mouth shut about that because they don't want to upset the meat eaters.
+Jack Edwards Many do not keep their mouth shut. People who are hooked don't want to hear about it, though. A kind of drug use, with the same old effects. Premature death, significantly lowered quality of life while the decline is in progress, cost society a lot of money... not throwing offenders in prison yet to cure them of their behavior yet, that I know of.
+Maxander2001 meat eating is one of the biggest and most normalized addictions there is. I agree like a drug.
watercup123456 Plant based food is more energy efficient (a LOT more), causes less mass extinction of all life, is better for human health, leads to a lot less land use, stops killing all life in the oceans, reduces the use of antibiotics (80%+) and thus resistance, reduces the development of pandemics (SARS, MERS, Ebola, AIDS, Bird Flu, Swine Flu, etc)... sounds like you lack a relevant university degree, most likely. There are zero benefits in including animal based foods in ones diet, unless to stave off immediate starvation or similar, until one can eat real food again.
@@JakEddzTransmitting Wrong eating meat is not a drug, it's sustenance. What is a drug is your incessant brainwashing
pick on livestock but millions of miles of bleating corn grown for ethanol and bio fuels via gmo corn at that is okay. Livestock manure enriches the soil, small farmers offer a great service to man and earth.
And you idiot Maxander2001 with your stupid comment
"Premature death, significantly lowered quality" brainwashed or UN parrots or also PETA shills?
@@Maxander2001 "Plant based food is more energy efficient" WRONG.
What she has done to princess Lathifa makes me sick , give me a break.
She is not authentic. Shameful!
Hello Jeannie, could you help have a clue on that which transpired between both?
@@sandra220386 watch the news or just research it ... we live in a globalised world 🤦♀️👀
still relavant
Is Howard Stern on vacation right now?
Culture in heart digity in work.
Very great! save the wold.
“For the last hundred years, the ocean has risen 20 cm - but for the previous hundred years the ocean also has risen 20 cm and for the last 300 years, the ocean has also risen 20 cm per 100 years. So there is no unusual rise in sea level. And to be sure you understand that I will repeat it. There is no unusual rise in sea level,” Giaever said. - Nobel prize winner
Totally liked it.
The European union didn't exist in 1973.
Guncriminal no but the European Economic Community, the precursor to the EU, did and that’s what she was referring to
@@garrettwyckoff8711 then that's what she should of said, if it's possible for politicans pushing lies, to speak honestly
Guncriminal right and too bad it was every formed.
Then stop the Geoengineering or Chemtrailing of our skies.
+havfaith S. you want a tinhat with that? hahaha
+havfaith S. Sigh...You would be funny if you werent so sad.
We need geoengineering to safe the world from morons, like Trump.
such an inspiration 💓💓
When she started talking about men, woman and equality I lost any interest in the video. Social justice warriors, you won, no matter what's the subject of the video, you will be there.
+João Vicente ok, sir. bc talking about injustice is just soo wrong hahaha
*+João Vicente* It's unfortunate this trend is a constant these days. 9:20 is insulting, considering how many boys and men die each year mining, logging, pumping the fuels that these poor women inhale in their homes.
Adrian Reminds me of a great quot from miss Hilary Clinton: "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat"
João Vicente
Hehe yes, that's a comment along those lines as well.
+João Vicente
they need to start with the big corporations first then the the the citizens of the world
It is far easier to terrorise common people with climate hoax than big companies. They know how to avoid stupid laws. Common people have no chance to do so.
Mary Robinson - best president Eire ever had!!!
James Fraher - Rubbish!
No
'The Iron Mountain Report'
8 years since this talk. I wonder if she gave up oil since then.
Great talk.
Why she didn't use typhoon haiyan as an example? Cause that killed thousands and corpse are just lying in the ground
I subscribed to this channel to see some new ideas and broaden my horizons. 90% of what i see on here now is just a big circle jerk where "Oh we all think the same!" I think its clear to see that anyone who disagrees with the main point are resisting these opinions wholeheartedly. Bring something fresh, teach me something new.
Sad that she is not willing to rely on facts, but calls for strong action which will limit rights.
+Jim Quinlan All this talk of rights to land, shelter, food, water but ignore the rights of the people who would have to provide all these things, you know, for "free." Why are people listening to politicians anyway?
+ZombieX13 Agreed. Sheeple.
+banphrionsa Fantásía I appreciate that. But, when you ignore science to promote your position, as she does here, then you should not be taken seriously.
***** There's no debate? The people of Europe just believe what they read? And this is some how better? lol
I seriously doubt "every educated person has examined the evidence." What's more likely is that they consumed someone else's interpretation and opinion of the material.
Also, No True Scottsman fallacy.
***** So those who have read the material and have rejected it in some fashion are then educated meaning your statement "because every educated person has already examined the evidence beforehand" is hollow. Your statement is tautological.
I seriously doubt that everyone who has read the "scientific articles" (and by your definition are now educated) agrees with the conclusion that global warming (Whatever that term is supposed to mean this week) is man-made, non-cyclical, etc. This is where the debate is... sort of: "educated" people disagree with the method or the conclusion thereby bringing the matter to debate.
There are scientists who do not agree with the "concensus." In fact, there are scientists who's work has been misinterpreted to support anthropogentic global warming. These scientists have tried to speak out but get silenced or ignored.
"I wasn't really impressed by the images of polar bears. It was because of the impact on people and their rights"... human rights are important, but don't let it turn into speciecism...
animals and tress are living things and have right to be on this planet.
“When government muzzles scientists for political reasons, it cuts at the fundamental principals of good science,” said Stephen Hwang, professor of general internal medicine at the University of Toronto.
+Kevin Jaquez and what does he have to do with climate change? LOL
+Vincent Reich there is no raw data that supports climate change being man made. the SUN has that role
+Kevin Jaquez "raw data" as in data you have seen and personally approved of, you mean?
+Maxander2001 absolutely not read my other comment
+Maxander2001 www.mediatheque.lindau-nobel.org/videos/34729/ivar-giaever-global-warming-revisited/laureate-giaever. here is real data
I love this lady
Why is that? Is it because you don't know the weather and climate is actually controlled and engineered? Because you don't know that you, we all are breathing in nano particles from the aerosols they spray in our air which are in the so called "green" bio fuel? I think that may be why you love her, and others like her.
Its a really good thing that the atmosphere is not nearly as sensitive to the co2 change thus will never be that bad.
The powers that be are modifying the weather and climate and have been for decades. It's all planned and intentional terraforming earth. We've been inhaling sensors for years via the aerosols they spray.
Look at climateviewer . com and weathermodification history dot com.
@@Meekseek Sorry, but there is no evidence of the climate being any different than it was 100 years ago.
@@roberthicks1612 oh, hmm were you on earth 100 yrs ago no, but some of use have been here for longer than you have say 60yrs when the skies where a clear deep dark blue and pale and not full of lines and plasma clouds and nano particles and so sorry but the climate is controlled by local weather when the weather is controlled globally it's affects the climate when the jet stream can be manipulated through the use of microwaves that can and does create droughts and floods,. Criminals get away with crimes because there are too many indifferent and or brainwashed humans on earth.
@@RosyOutlook2 No, but I know how to read science journals. I was here 60 years ago, and so I know the pollution was worse in the 1980's and 1990's than they are now. Nor did the pollution start then. You must be looking back with rose colored glasses because there was a lot of push for clean air in the 1960's.
In order to have climate control, there has to be evidence that the climate change has happened. There is no scientific evidence that the climate has change in any way that is not natural.
Go ahead and believe your religion, but there is no science to back it up.
@@RosyOutlook2 You should probably loosen that hat you're wearing. I think it's cutting off your circulation
What's going on at that US Military Base in Northern Ireland with your mates Fenech, Al Maktoum & Blackwater Mary?
Don't you fkn DARE talk about Climate Change & Human Rights when you are one of the most notorious criminal offenders on the planet when it comes to Human Rights & Climate Change, just like the rest of your Organised Crime & Terrorist Gang...
Mna Na hEireann.. Mary Robinson what a class act..
ONE EARTH WORLD
ONE CONSTITUTION
ONE DEMOCRACY
ONE ELECTION
ONE PATH TO EXTINCTION.
Firns, delta, pool, thank you
When did TED talks stop being about science and more about backing social issues with science; That isn't to say I think global warming isn't very real issue(it fugging is!) but rather in previous years TED was mostly about what was happening in science, how it was improving the lives of people, helping the planet; the concrete improvements that the sciences are bringing about. Now it seems 2/3 talks pertain to some person or another's opinion on the abstract of social problems.
When all the common core indoctrinated X gen got their smart phones and they realizes they could brainwash them to beg for their own & the entire western world's downfall making Agenda21's job that much easier. The weather is controlled globally with science and technology, which liars will never disclose, they instead say " we need to save earth and geoengineer the planet " " We need to dump sulphur and aluminum nano particles and millions may die" but oh well look up WeatherModificationHistory. com and climateviewer
Heard a lot of politics, not a lot of science.
It's foreseeable when even the title contains the words "human rights".
I'm a moral realist, I think rights are to be derived from observing actual best practices for win/win human interaction. Politics is just bullshit. TED isn't supposed to be about politics, hence no 'P' in the acronym.
You think you can calculate the optimal parameters, is that what you're saying? Technocracy fails at this part, as you can't predict the outcome of a chaotic system, especially when it is this big. Not even the Illuminati have cracked the code on this at the moment.
TheAnnoyingGunner I think we can observe what truths are available to us with current technology and do our best. Strict philosophical (logical & objective) arguments are also quite useful in this regard. It's not an all-or-nothing proposition. We also have a historical record which strongly suggests that cultures which prize individual freedom advance quickly to the benefit of all.
***** That's not an argument. I'd be happy to discuss the possibilities of free will and individual freedom, but you'd have to stop trolling and actually state your objections.
where is the raw data?!?!
+Kevin Jaquez haha hidden, you can't see it under your tinfoil hat.
+Vincent Reich troll
+Kevin Jaquez As if noone have ever given you a link to NASA or IPCC and you have dismissed it outright because it does not match your worldview.
If you have not bothered googling "NASA raw data" yourself can you honestly say that you have any actual interest in the raw data?
Start with NASA.
+David Patterson nasa has been caught skewing data
If we're going to have a carbon tax, can we have an oxygen credit as well? It's about the balance right?
+willie quarton There should be a renewable energy credit. Plants will turn the CO2 back into oxygen.
+Patternicity carbon recapture credit. I like it
willie quarton um.. that too, but that's not what I meant. I meant the tax revenue from a carbon tax should be used to subsidize renewable energy and things that use renewable energy.
Carbon tax is an incentive to make renewable energy instead of burning fossilized dinosaurs which emit their co2 .
@tony ryan Then we should tax the oil company's and rich people. Ever heard of climate justice?
KB had HD c
the planet is burning!!!
She is the Irish face of the Sabatean frankists.
pushing climate change as the weather and climate is controlled I'd say that is a face of evil and there are many of her.
Can I put it this way: Climate Change Is not a big Threat to Human Rights, the luxury way of your living style is. :-P
+dujoin in what way will it NOT jeopardise human rights?
of course by bombing the terrorists: theintercept.com/2015/10/05/the-radically-changing-story-of-the-u-s-airstrike-on-afghan-hospital-from-mistake-to-justification/
I thought we were talking about global warming?
PTfilekiller SHE is talking about "global warming", we are talking about defending human right, and I am talking about violating human right.
i asked you in what way global warming will NOT jeopardise human rights, it obviously will, and you link something about bombing terrorists...
join them brother hood hsssssssssssssssssss
Everyone just counterlike, ... that is if u think the reasoning is sound
BTW, interesting perspective
19:45 ☝️
Crossing my fingers that "Global Warming" finally kicks back in this winter after such a long hiatus… I really don't like the cold…
Fuel Cell Energy in Connecticut,USA is the answer.
I didn't know Irish could sound so posh.
+TheLivirus The upper class here in Ireland (myself included) do sound quite British but those who are not very educated speak quit commonly.
+Paul Brosnan alri bud?!
+Paul Brosnan She doesn't sound 'British' at all as there's no such thing. She has an Irish accent.
It's just a phase we have to get over... Like in the teenage years...
+XDRosenheim ?
+XDRosenheim probably a pretty long "phase" my friend. suggest you re-think that comment
A phase can't be long?
+XDRosenheim LOL
we found a winner
What about attacking animal agriculture? Why does no one talk about the carbon emissions that comes from animal agriculture and why are we not tackling it when it is reportedly the number 1 cause to climate change?
+James Chang Maybe because livestock, like cows, cause methane not CO2. And people do talk about it.
Methane contributes to the greenhouse gases which leads to climate change.
*****
thank you captain ovbious
We need to do all those things, or use geoengineering.
bc it isn't
I knew TED talks were in decline but this was the first title I saw that was nothing but buzzwords.
+FTWINZOR Finally someone gets it.
I beleave the awnser to this problem is The Venus Project or RBE
We are the ones who caused this, we are the ones who will pay the price, the poor, the rich, everyone. There's no one else to blame but us. The thing that matters is whether we decide to fix this. But from now up until that point, we suffer,
Besides, human rights are the least of our worries, save the Earth, save us. You want back your human rights? Give Earth back its rights first.
@@nguyencaotri3879 Duh. No I did not cause this spider boy, weather and climate engineering caused this, sending rockets and satellites into space caused this. Earth don't need rights you brainwashed child.
world bank are you serious? common!
This is based on modelling and projections. All these extrapolations are wrong. They have always been wrong. Just sayin'
You are saying that the peer-reviewed modelling and projections of thousands of scientists are wrong?
@@Elladajosie 1st it's not thousands, that's already a bleating lie, most of the IPCC is not science it's governmental, and that's right wrong and a LIE. The weather and climate is engineered, and it has been for decades, well before were born, you'd know that if you didn't have your mind brainwashed by the UN and the IPCC's thousands of cronies . WeatherModificationHistory. com Climateviewer. com. " Weather Modification Using Electromagnetic Beams common knowledge at Aquiess,Inc.SD" "Owning the Weather" "Project Popeye" "Project Cirrus" " Weather and Climate Modification - National Science Foundation"
'Weather modification operations in California,' June 1955."
"S. 3383 (94th): National Weather Modification Policy Act
Introduced: May 5, 1976 94th Congress, 1975-1976
Status:Enacted" "S.517 - Weather Modification Research and Development Policy Authorization Act" " NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL OD-14 Office of the Director Boulder, Colorado May 1972 Cumulus Clouds And Their Modification" "Why Big Oil Conquered the World"
I keep telling Brandon that climate change has nothing to do with his poopy diaper. He will never listen. Just Biden My Time!
our climate has changed before and will change again I don't see why people are trying to stop the inevitable
+ClockinLoot Shouldn't be changing this fast though...
+ClockinLoot when it changes naturally it reaches a new equilibrium. we are perpetually fucking it up
Horlicks
N
It's all a lie!
The biggest problem, to me at least, the seemingly hardest choice that seems to be: If we carry on growing econmically, we put out selves in ever more danger from climate change. However, in order to reduce climate change to under 2 degrees, we effectively have to plundge ourselves into poverty. And we are just so close to ending poverty. In the 15 years, there will be no poor countries. So we either get grower riches and the planet warms up, or, we reduce the change but we're all poor. Either way, we're fucked. Another thing: Why do we call it mother earth? Why are there people who asume that nature is a conscious, real thing?
+Malcolm Pagett We don't have to plunge ourselves into poverty to reduce CO2 Emissions. Even with current technology we could have 50% renewables + 50% nuclear at a reasonable price. The price of solar is on an exponential curve, just like microprocessors. "mother earth" is just an expression. lol.
+Patternicity I hope you're right.
Heuuu
climategate 1&2 look them up
Weather modification history . com that a good one too.
TED = The, Entertainment, District
Quick question, what makes climate change unfair? What makes anything unfair? From a naturalistic belief, is that not just the way of the world?
Is Mary Robinson a vegetarian?
Human induce climate changed directly affected a bad crops event in a village in Uganda? You have any scientific backing on that extraordinary claim? Do you realize how many "bad crops" there where in human history long before CO2 emission machines where even a thing?
I'm sorry, but this lady is just making assumptions without bases.
Loving the conspiracy comments.
This isn't about humanity... This is about earth.
We don't have to care about Earth if it's not about humanity.
I think, she no say nothing over chemtraills
although human CO2 emissions are a big problem, it is far from the biggest fish to fry on this. CO2 is useful for crops, it needs to be in the right places (such as not over the ocean), and we will need CO2 to provide food because of the changing weather cycles. many old farms will drought, many will flood, those that are left must be able to provide enough food for the populations.
we will have to actively cool the world by blocking sunlight, this will require us to go to space and move celestial objects. a geosynchronous asteroid or 10,000 will be needed to help block out the growing sunlight. don't think it has to do with the sun? go ahead and explain the changing weather on the other planets then. we aren't polluting jupiter.
Is she native English speaker?
Hãy tưởng tượng nhiều ngườ phải di chuyển để tìm cuộc sống mới. Thế giới thiếu nước ngọt va thức ăn.
Howdy? You Made The Difference! jar flap What's your opinion about
Mary Robinson, I had the privilege to drive you & husband from Limerick train station to Motel on Dublin rd I wanted to ask Mr. Robinson if we were related My family is Casey+ Robinson Relations in the north I have never met I am going back to Steve Coughlan period in Limerick if you or Mr. Robinson could reply please, My Gran always said MR Robinson was related Family in England I have never met Lady you are beautiful A Irish woman.
Si
Climate change is a physical reality, that is and will continue to destroy vast numbers of species, and the way we are going, us as well. Human rights is a concept only, an assertion of our superior condition, and is a gross conceit. Not offered to the other species we destroy and enslave. Personally, I am unconcerned with human rights; my concern is the continuation of all life, and not the gross murder by our gross arrogance.
You've been well brainwashed to hate humans eh,
well indoctrinated, vegan I bet and common core schooled, watch cowspriacy, fork over knifes and a slew of rubbish, look down at your phone a lot I bet but never up at the skies or you may know the weather and climate is engineered and has been since before your mummy was born. Have not a clue the skies should be a clear deep dark blue and not the millennium pale blue and white crap you were born under, your parents didn't pay any attention either, so they didn't teach you squat. And not surprising for a cc shill.
Your channel doesn't have any content
I'm gonna sue the dinosaurs because they died and left there carbon in the ground!
Overpopulation is a bigger threat to human rights.
She was a SJW before it was cool.
TheAnnoyingGunner it was never cool.
How did this old woman get to this conference? Did she walk or cycle a bike? Doubt it. I'd say she was driven to the airport. I'd say she flew to California . I'd say she had a car waiting for her at the airport. I'd say she has a carbon footprint that is more than thousands of families combined. I'd say she is a multi millionaire. I'd say the burning of fossil fuels paid a huge part in her wealth creation. I'd say she got handsomely rewarded for this speech. She is a complete hypocrite. If she was genuinely worried about climate change and leaving the poor of the world behind couldn't she have given her speech through Skype? A joke.
People wach Program about Dubai’s missing princess Latifa. This Mary so calld Humen Wright protecter HANDElD absolutely WRONG in HER Case. SHAME on HER.
Awwww... I thought that climate alarmism has been burried for good after all the lies and the forgeries that have been exposed. But there seems to be a bunch of extremists that still hasn't given up on the idea to tax (carbon based) life itself. My advice: First, get the science straight, stop lying, stop insulting sceptics.
If there will be a case left for carbon reduction (what I doubt) - come up with proposals that don't push millions of people into poverty.
How riddled this is with Internal contradictions is kinda miraculous. Yet, the seals clap in unison and on command. Climate related deaths have shrunk by 92 percent over the last century lady, BECAUSE of fossil fuels. Once technology develops that can match the output potential of fossil fuels, I promise you we will transitions. Till then, the fossil fuel show goes on.
Such a boring speech because it lacks real concrete examples. This is the weakness of 9 out of 10 speeches on TED Talk. Without concrete, descriptive examples, not only would professors fail you on your report or speeches, but you just come out with a vague, time-waster, general, dehumanizing speech.
Global Waming BS again sigh