Helloooo ! I'm making voice over and voice track in Canada, and I'm interrested by this Intellimix. Can you let me know what you think about the mic processor in this console ? Is it easy to achieve good dense sound (for the moment I use digital Symetrix processor) ? And the last is it agreable to monitor the soubd while speaking. Some processors have a little bit of latency, and it's not really nice to spak while monitoring (Wheatstone M2 for exemple...). Thank you for your comment.
Hi, there! The soundprocessing of this console is zero-latency. Because it’s used in radiostations you won’t be able to hear a delay while listening to the final mix. The mic-Signal can be processed by using dynamics, eq, limiter and more on the channel. What the console does not have is a processing for the master-channel. With the Pro-Version you‘ll get plenty of options to route the signals on busses and stuff. For me, the little brother was fine, because my mic-signal is only processed for my monitor-mix in the headphones - my customers get the unprocessed signal, so they can work with it themselves.
@@SebastianEck Great ! Thank you for your answer.s For my part (radio productions in most cases) my clients needs a voice processed, but no process on the beds and liners... so it seems to be good. Latency is a problem for me because I have a lot of recording sessions everyday... The problem for me, is that it's impossible to test before buying...
@@Jihem73 you're welcome! I think there is a pdf-document with specs on the website, where you can find latency-calculation, too. greetings to Canada! :)
Einfach der Sprecher der ZDF-Teaser und des ZDF Fernsehgartens 👍
jetzt fehlt nur noch das versprochene nächste Video ;)
und daaaaaa isses endlich!! 😁 ruclips.net/video/eiod_xJrr8k/видео.html
gutes video
Helloooo !
I'm making voice over and voice track in Canada, and I'm interrested by this Intellimix. Can you let me know what you think about the mic processor in this console ? Is it easy to achieve good dense sound (for the moment I use digital Symetrix processor) ? And the last is it agreable to monitor the soubd while speaking. Some processors have a little bit of latency, and it's not really nice to spak while monitoring (Wheatstone M2 for exemple...).
Thank you for your comment.
Hi, there!
The soundprocessing of this console is zero-latency. Because it’s used in radiostations you won’t be able to hear a delay while listening to the final mix.
The mic-Signal can be processed by using dynamics, eq, limiter and more on the channel. What the console does not have is a processing for the master-channel.
With the Pro-Version you‘ll get plenty of options to route the signals on busses and stuff. For me, the little brother was fine, because my mic-signal is only processed for my monitor-mix in the headphones - my customers get the unprocessed signal, so they can work with it themselves.
@@SebastianEck Great ! Thank you for your answer.s For my part (radio productions in most cases) my clients needs a voice processed, but no process on the beds and liners... so it seems to be good. Latency is a problem for me because I have a lot of recording sessions everyday... The problem for me, is that it's impossible to test before buying...
@@Jihem73 you're welcome! I think there is a pdf-document with specs on the website, where you can find latency-calculation, too. greetings to Canada! :)