Which Disney villains do YOU think were right? Let us know below, and check out our video of the Top 20 Disney Characters Who Are Actually the Villain - ruclips.net/video/qPeBG5GCgFw/видео.html
Actually maleficent was invited to the party it was one of the fairies fault they didn't deliver her invitation right so saying she wasn't wanted was actually not right she actually was wanted at the party turns out the fairy was too scared to go into maleficent's Castle so if the fairy hadn't been afraid to deliver maleficent's Castle she would n't she wouldn't have a reason to put her curse upon the princess so if the fairy apologize to maleficent
I agree with you about captain Hook as the misunderstood character but the one thing I don't know you know is someone actually did what you said about switching pan and hook's about but it was also different in the same time and that series is called once upon a time although you don't see hook till the second session I think and pan till second three and again I think as can't remember at this time.
Even though Skinner was exploiting Gusteau's name for proffit, he was still just doing his job, trying to keep a clean and irderly kitchen. Reporting Remy to the healt department was totally justified. If he were more pleasant to be around, you'd really feel sorry for him.
Frozen meal business is good. Considering Skinner was doing it after the death of a famous chief, it is t hard to imagine he’s doing it in case the restaurant does go out of business. Matpat was right about Skinner.
I understand why Skinner made that choice to make profit, the restaurant was falling apart and was doing what he can to keep the business alive, he just went about it the wrong way. I wouldn't want my promised inheritance to go to someone incompetent either. I think if Linguini showed more competence, Skinner would've let it happen but also would've tried to found a way to make more profit out of it.
@@vetarlittorf1807 I know, right? This channel doesn’t seem to understand that Ursula was a manipulative control freak who wrongfully kills merpeople who failed to pay the price. It’s like scamming or bamboozling people out of their money, even if it contributes to their unexpected execution.
@vetarlittorf1807 gonna be this guy but.... it's probably because the character of Ursula is based on a drag queen. And thus lots of people now are more sympathetic for the warped reason that they think she's a victim or just seeing her as a Trans symbol.
@@LegoReader12345hello Not to mention terrorizing Mr. Incredible’s family by shooting missiles while they were aboard a plane and nonchalantly allowing Mr. Incredible to crush Mirage, who was willing to sacrifice her well-being to help him. Syndrome is clearly an ungrateful supervillain.
@@pbsfundingaddict790His descent into villainy ought to serve as a cautionary tale about letting one's ego get the best of oneself as well as a lesson in taking no for an answer.
Selling his inventions to the highest bidder once he “had his fun “ doesn’t make Syndrome a man of the people as much as some believe. He had no qualms allowing children to die when he launched a missile at Helens plane nor did he blink when Mirages life was threatened Likewise he wouldn’t care he’d be selling weapons and technology to really shady individuals if they paid the right price
@@nicholassims9837 No it didn't. It showed the point of view of toys that actually don't mind being lost. A toy created from trash, toys that were left in an antique shop, as well as plush dolls that never get played with because the carnival games are rigged. And in the end it was Woody's choice to make his own life decisions
A better title for this video should have been "villains who have a point" rather than villains were right all along because the current title makes it sound like everything they said was correct. Even when it's so blatantly obvious it was self-serving and used to manipulate the heroes
She means that while the villain was wrong, it’s the heroes fault that they have to do this. If only they weren’t so selfish, this wouldn’t have happened.
I gotta disagree with Ursula. True Ariel could have swam away, but Ursula cheated. She had no intention of letting Ariel win. It was all a ploy to get the throne.
Honestly that defense is more in line with the sea witch from the fairy tale since the sea witch was honest from the start and never interfered with the mermaid’s attempts at winning the prince.
Yep, Ursula cheated. She hated humans and we can’t forget that she killed innocent merpeople who were unable to pay the price. Were it not for King Triton, Ursula would’ve gotten away with it and Ariel and Eric would’ve never been a married couple and Ariel would’ve still been a human. The throne is a privilege, not a right.
Also Ariel is a minor, and contracts with minors aren't binding, the very moment the go nope they don't want to continue the contract is null and void... however went triton co-signed that made it binding to him
Nope. Ursula manipulated the whole situation to make sure that she was there to pick up the pieces. Just because Ariel signed away her voice willingly doesn't mean she was pure in intent. She clearly wasn't when she tried to take over Triton's kingdom.
I agree with you. Ursula is a manipulative control freak who tricked Ariel into trading her voice for human legs and had killed broke merpeople who failed to pay the price. Now that’s a murderer if I’ve seen one.
@@pbsfundingaddict790she didn't kill them, she turned them into those weird creatures that are into her entrance that tried to stop Ariel from going to see her. But because they looked creepy Ariel simply was spooked and didn't understand what they wanted. She even warned Ariel that's what will happen to her if she fails during her song poor unfortunate souls with pictures. And that's what she turned her into when she failed. And that's what she turned Triton when he chose to take Ariel's place. She was very manipulative, BUT she never lied or killed anyone, at least in the animated version.
That's just how villains are, but at least Ursula wasn't a liar. And that contract was legal at all terms, and would have been whether it was by her will or not.
Right. If Ursula hadn't interfered with Ariel's wooing of Eric, then Ursula would've been right all along. However, she had her minions actively sabotage Ariel's efforts even going so far as to brainwashing Eric so that Ariel would run out of time and then be held accountable to the terms of the contract. That then allowed her to make a play for Triton's throne. Was Ursula's plan genius? Yes. Was she correct in doing it? No.
Well to be fair, Yzma was overstepping her bounds by doing Kuzko's job so her being fired was kind of justified whether of not what of kind of person Kuzko was.
to be specific, in all probability Yzma was increasingly ignoring the other half of her regency job (reporting/doing proper paperwork and asking Kuzco's opinion before actually implementing stuff)
Robert Callaghan was right, but, as seen in a previous video, he went to extremes to avenge his daughter’s supposed death. In the end, he got to see his daughter again, but he carted off to jail shortly after.
For what it’s worth, Callahan addresses the Tadashi tragedy at the end of the series’ first season when Hiro went to inquire about a separate matter in incarceration. Callahan concluded by saying he hopes that Hiro could find it within him to forgive him. Hiro didn’t immediately, but hoped to follow suit eventually. As far as we know, he never did.
Contrary to popular belief, Syndrome was not right all along. Now allow me to explain. As we know, when he was Buddy Pine, all he wanted was to join Mr. Incredible and help him out, but Mr. Incredible kept refusing and rejecting him, which drove him to villainy. However, it never occurred to Buddy that his hero was only trying to protect him. After all, being a superhero can be dangerous, especially for children. If Mr. Incredible did let Buddy join him, he would have been allowing him to put his life in danger. Not to mention, Buddy had already proven how unfit he was to be super as he clearly didn't realize there's more to being super than cool suits, gadgets and beating up bad guys. If his massive ego hadn't prevented him from realizing the dangers of being super and that Mr. Incredible just wanted him safe, he wouldn't have turned bad. So really, it's Buddy's fault he turned bad. Though I do agree that Mr. Incredible could have been much more nicer about rejecting him.
True, Mr. Incredible should have explained it to him instead of pushing him away and yelling at him, then maybe buddy would have understood and not been evil.
The "Self-Serving Memory" page on TVTropes takes this a step further: "While Syndrome guilts Mr. Incredible into thinking he was wrong to have rejected him as a sidekick, his flashback conveniently omits all the problems _he_ caused that night. The scene of Mr. Incredible telling Buddy that he works alone is a particularly interesting example: In the actual events, Mr. Incredible was struggling against a supervillain named Bomb Voyage while trying to both apprehend the villain and convince Buddy to leave the dangerous situation. In Syndrome's flashback, Mr. Incredible's pose and tone is far more condescending and dismissive, and Bomb Voyage is entirely absent, making it seem like Mr. Incredible was pushing Buddy away for no reason at all."
@@TheMaskGamer2007 The thing is although Mr. Incredible could have treated him better, perhaps even if Mr. Incredible had not rejected him, he would either still become a villain eventually, or at least an anti-hero as his reckless nature aside, Buddy's self-serving nature made him unworthy of being a hero.
@@TheMaskGamer2007 He yelled at Buddy right after his antics let Bomb Voyage get away and almost killed dozens if not hundreds of people by exploding a bridge. He was rightfully pissed that Buddy was so sure of himself that he didn't even realize what a big mess he made.
There's a reason you don't let 10 year old drive or vote. I remember as kid accidentally destroying a portion of plant while playing was big enough reason to get yelled at. If getting mad like this I would be buddy 100x.
I’m sorry, Sid was horrible and Lotso had his chance for redemption but threw it away. I feel bad for what happened to him, but proved himself irredeemable when he left the toys to be incinerated.
The filmmakers never intended to make Lotso sympathy when they made his backstory so they increased his cruelty to have that thrown out the window and assure people that his defeat is well deserved.
Syndrome formerly known as “Incrediboy” went from the Mr. Incredible fanboy to the genius villain and a murderer in 2004’s ‘The Incredibles’, one of my top 3 favorite Pixar movies.
Plus when he was still "Incrediboy" Mr. Incredible really saved his life when he took off the bomb that Bombvoyage had put on his cape when he went for the police (simply choosing to save him instead of defeating the villain)
It’s worth noting that the sea witch in “The Little Mermaid” by Hans Christian Andersen isn’t as evil and manipulative as Ursula. Sure, the conditions that the sea witch laid out for the mermaid were harsh and bloody, but she never lied to the little mermaid about them. The sea witch never interfered with the mermaid’s plans to win the prince’s heart. However, when the little mermaid was unable to win the prince’s heart, the mermaid’s sisters were able to renegotiate the deal with the sea witch by trading in their locks of hair in exchange for a dagger that the mermaid would plunge into the prince’s heart in order to turn her back into a mermaid as opposed to sea foam. Furthermore, the little mermaid went to the sea witch on her own volition (as opposed to escaping an abusive father); and the sea witch initially refused to allow the mermaid become human for the prince only to then give in despite the sea witch’s warnings to the little mermaid that it would lead to heartbreak.
@@Wiiguy1606 That’s more than I can say for the filmmakers of “The Little Mermaid” (1989) who most likely didn’t read, let alone understood, the source material. I’m honestly convinced that Disney’s decision to turn “The Little Mermaid” into a romantic comedy was due to the success of “Splash”, a 1984 fantasy rom-com about a mermaid (played by Daryl Hannah) who falls for the first human guy she saves from drowning (played by Tom Hanks) and then acquires legs in order to be with him on land for a few days, even though she can’t talk. “Splash” was released under Disney’s adult facing label “Touchstone Films”, so yes, “Splash” counts as a Disney movie. And sure, the fairy tale “The Little Mermaid” predates “Splash” by a century, but there are some elements in Disney’s “The Little Mermaid” that did not exist in the fairy tale but did exist in “Splash”: - Ariel swimming through a sunken ship - Ariel being fascinated by a music box featuring a dancing couple on it - Ariel exhibiting terrible table manners while wearing a nice pink dress on her dinner date with Prince Eric in which the main course is some form of crustacean - Ariel transforming into a mermaid while wearing a nice blue dress in front of everyone including Prince Eric - Prince Eric chasing after Ariel in the water to save her from the bad guys during the film’s climax
@@beethovensfidelio Well filmmakers aren't exactly obligated to follow every plot point to the letter and they do their own takes sometimes which is why a lot of media based on existing material isn't done verbatim. It's why there is many different versions of things wether it be movies, TV Shows or video games etc.
@@beethovensfidelio No. They did read and understand the source material. That much is clear with how the first act follows very similar story beats. However, they just wanted a more secular and happier version.
For Maleficent you have to keep in mind she's also a member of the Fae. So some fairies getting invited while another was "not wanted" breaks fairy hospitality laws(which are mandatory, even if you're not informed) so Maleficent was following her own laws as they are within their rights to curse any member of the offending party.
No way, I can't agree on BALTHAZAR. Just because he worked for Madame for an extended period doesn't mean he's entitled to her ENTIRE estate. Normally in these situations there would be a generous lump sum set aside for him - commiserate with his longevity and diligence, but that's IT; he was an employee, neither friend nor family. Madame was entitled to give HER money to whomever she so chooses... no matter how outrageous the amount or how seemingly silly. Absolutely NOT 'misunderstood.'
The one thing that I love about all these Disney villains is that even though their motives for villainy are all different they are all also understandable. Some of the characters on this list may not have chosen to be villains but for some of them being bad feels so good.
Yeah, Gantu wasn't even doing anything that malicious towards our heroes in Lilo and Stitch neither, at least not as bad. but it still just feels as though you can't help but feel sorry for this big guy. Especially with how much abuse he would eventually had to endure when he decided to work with Dr. Hanstaveil in both Stitch the Movie and Lilo and Stitch the Series. In hindsight, Gantu is definitely one of the most underrated sympathetic villains in the Disney canon.
In my personal opinion the real villain in the original Lilo & Stitch movie was the Grand Councilwoman not Captain Gantu. the end result of his mission makes him out to be an anti-hero not a villain. if I were in his shoes when told that he was being fired for failing a single mission I'd go off script and slap the Grand Councilwoman in the face and say "you think you can fire me? well you can't fire me and you won't because I quit."
@@nicholassims9837 well put yourself in his shoes would you put up with such a decision from the boss of any job much less an intergalactic empress like the Grand Councilwoman?
@@PrincessKnightNekolucario8742 Except for me, I didn't loos my hand to a alligator, I went through so much hell as a kid and everyone saw me as a bad guy even tho I wasn't.
Maleficent was actually entitled to a invitation. Based on the time period, the birth of an heir was something that'd even call a ceasefire in wars because you invite all neighboring monarchy to the event.
Exactly. And the "You aren't wanted" was the main reason why she went for such a strong punishment. King and Queen should have stepped in and apologize for the fairy (which they even invited). Insulting one of the most powerful persons around the kingdom wasnt very smart
With Ursula, while Ariel DID go to her willingly, the only reason she failed was because Ursula took her own human form, hypnotized Eric, and used Ariel's voice to trick him on the last day. Not to mention her minions (probably on her orders) interrupted the kiss during the song "Kiss the Girl".
Couldn’t agree more. He took his anger out on other toys, especially Big Baby, Chuckles and Andy’s toys. Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully belonged to Daisy, but Lotso let his disappointment completely consume him and snatched the two innocent toys away from Daisy. It’s ridiculous how he turned Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and issued wrongful punishments against Andy’s toys for attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and showing connections to their owners. Most importantly, he nearly killed Andy’s toys at the incinerator even after Woody and Buzz saved his life. Lotso is ultimately a spiteful toy with a heart made of stone incapable of redemption.
@@BG-be8di I agree with you. What Lotso did was virtually inexcusable and unforgivable compared to this. - Even though he was once a loving, kind-hearted and caring friend of Big Baby and Chuckles, all of that changed completely the moment he saw Daisy with another Lotso, turning himself into a wrathful and abusive tyrant who imprisoned innocent toys for pleasure. While he justified his actions to Buzz by saying that children in the caterpillar room, he later admitted he sent toys to the caterpillar room so they’ll be thrown away. - He transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a depressing prison where he forces toys who are lower in the pecking order to be beaten, abused and played with roughly by the younger kids, eventually causing them to break, at which point they get sent to the dumpster and are likely incinerated. Toys that defy Lotso are placed into the sandbox. He even has this happen to Mr. Potato Head and lets Ken see to it happening twice. He's also providing a cutting and choking hazard for the kids by providing them with age-inappropriate toys in the first place. This makes his torture unique compared to Sid, who was kind of a jerk to his sister, but had no idea that toys were alive. - It is implied that he had Chuckles beaten, broken and even injured after he decided that he wasn't going to have any part of Lotso's empire, despite him being his friend. - He brainwashed Buzz Lightyear into becoming one of his henchmen when the latter refused to join the Butterfly Room alone, manipulating him into thinking Andy's toys are helpers of Emperor Zurg and then having him beat down and lock up his own friends all while smiling maliciously. - When he finds out that Andy's toys have escaped and saw that Chatter Telephone was involved in this, he and his gang tortured and injured him to confess their whereabouts until he told him that the protagonists are at the dumpster. - After Big Baby hears the truth about Daisy from Woody, Lotso (who had continuously lied to him over the years about her not loving them anymore and replacing them while also pretending to be his father figure) smashes his pendant before violently poking him with his mallet in front of everyone else, including his own minions whom Lotso calls dummies. - He orders Stretch to push Woody and the other toys into the dumpster. Amongst said other toys is Ken, whom Lotso personally throws there with as a petty punishment just for loving Barbie. Even his henchmen are disgusted by this; hence, Stretch doesn't like being called a dummy and watching his friend Ken be abused, and never tries to push the toys as he was ordered to. - He drags Woody into the dumpster so that he can make sure the cowboy dies along with him. - He leaves Andy's toys to die in the incinerator, despite Woody and Buzz risking their own lives to save him from the shredder earlier, thus he would have succeeded of having the toys massacred if not for the Aliens' intervention. - Although his minions served him, Lotso doesn't even care about them because he only just used them as his slaves for following his orders and doing the horrible dirty work of ruling Sunnyside. - As Woody points out, Lotso's backstory doesn't justify anything he did. No matter how much Daisy "abandoning" him hurt him, his actions surpassed the excuse because: - The reason why Daisy replaced Lotso was because he was her favorite toy and she lost him purely by accident, not because she didn't love him. - He forced Chuckles and Big Baby to run away from home and join him in his suffering, even though they weren't even replaced at all, only him. Big Baby would spend years assuming he had been replaced too. Even when Chuckles tried to point out the truth about Lotso's replacement as well. - The toys that Lotso took his anger out on had nothing to do with him getting replaced at all. - To summarize it, Lotso abandoned Daisy, not the other way around, due to not being able to accept someone else having her if he couldn't, making his motive a selfish one, and by extension, it turns his horrendous treatment of the other toys into his way of angrily lashing out at everyone else with the mindset that if he can't be happy, no one can. Also, when he left Woody and the gang to die, all the sympathy was thrown out of the window.
@@jarjaxle Test audiences who sympathized with Lotso for his backstory wanted him to push the button in the incinerator scene to redeem himself. However, according to the DVD commentary, director Lee Unkrich explained that the filmmakers decided to drop Lotso's chance for redemption in order to make the audience who had gotten to know Andy's toys over the past fifteen years in three movies care about the heroes even more as they went to the fire when it looked like the end for them before the Pizza Planet Aliens rescued them with the claw. Another reason is because they did not want Lotso to get off so easy, so they just increased his cruelty to ensure to the audience that he deserved what he got in the end (being strapped to the grille of a garbage truck).
And despite his cruelty in telling Hiro that Tadashi's death was his own mistake, he does appear to be correct in saying so, as Tadashi chose to run into the SFIT building by himself, thus resulting in his death. That said as he acknowledges, nothing excused his callous way of saying it.
@@DavidBContentExtravaganza3967 Here's the thing though, it's unknown how the fire started or even if Callaghan attempted/refused to help Tadashi after he ran in to save him so hard to say if Callaghan is completely blameless in it.
@@Altoryu given how quickly the explosion happened after Tadashi went in, it would have been unlikely he got much beyond the entrance. That said, it doesn't alter the fact that Callaghan set the fire to start with; even if Tadashi didn't run in, he would have put first responders at risk, not to mention the possible environmental damage and health risks from the smoke created from who knows what at a science fair full of plastics and chemicals.
Agreed and Sid’s behavior was perfectly normal for boys his age and he didn’t know that toys were alive. Sid can’t be that bad and is far from pure evil.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 No way, that kid was one step away from becoming a psychopath. First it’s toys, then little animals, and before you know it… people. I’ve watched a lot of Criminal Minds episodes.
@@chuumon95 As a little girl, I used to take apart Lego knights, turn them into giant scorpions, then organise Lego scorpion fights. Haven't murdered anyone yet. My two cats are spoilt rotten.
For Ursula, we don‘t know why she was banned and therefore we can‘t say, if her revenge plan was justified or not. In regard of Ariel, she lost her justified position at the moment, when she stole prince Eric from Ariel to guarantee, that Ariel would lose her part if the contract.
For Sid I believe I heard a theory that his father is abusive and drunk (seen in the commercial scene, he’s asleep but he could be passed out drunk ) so he takes his frustration out on the toys to let out the anger and pain he gets from his father
That's a fair point, since he ends up befriending Lilo and Stitch anyway and because he was just fighting for what he saw as justice. I agree with you 100%
Now I can see why Edgar would want to get rid of the cats. He was loyal to the woman for I don’t know how many years, but she left her fortune to her cats. I mean…what are the cats are going to do with the money?
Edgar should have realized that cats can’t use money, he probably would still have the money, just has to dedicate money for the cats, like maintain them and care for them, then he would have the money when they pass away
@@LegoReader12345helloI blame her for that. She could've at least told Edgar that the money doesn't go to the Cats directly, but rather left the Money for Edgar to mainly take good care of them. And before that call, Edgar was nothing but nice to the Cats.
Peter Pan and Wendy kind of reversed the good guy and bad guy roles. It made Peter a bad friend and Hook a misunderstood character who just wanted to go home
11:33 But Ursula did play dirty. Ariel almost got Eric to kiss her, but was foiled by Ursula’s eels. Then she put a spell on Eric to fall in love with the wrong girl.
Even when he was a child, his anger at Mr. Incredible rejecting him became heavily outweighed by his lack of regard for what a super means and self-serving desires. This is especially true since: As a child, he was very reckless and ignorant; he went into Mr. Incredible's car without permission and even claimed that he didn't have to worry about training him because he, as Mr. Incredible's biggest fan, already knows his every move. He simply assumed that the reason he was told to go home was because he had no superpowers, even though it's evident that it's much more because he was interfering while Mr. Incredible was trying to stop Bomb Voyage and that Mr. Incredible was worrying about his safety, which he exploited. He believes that being a super is about wearing cool outfits and beating people up instead of saving lives. This shows that he had no desire to help other people and only wanted to be a super just for fame. Neither as a child or adult does he acknowledge that his recklessness nearly got himself and civilians on a train killed if it weren't for Mr. Incredible, leading to one of the lawsuits that forced supers into hiding. The other supers whom he killed and the citizens he endangered with his Omnidroids had nothing to do with Mr. Incredible rejecting him at all. While he didn't have a full understanding of what it means to be a superhero at the time, he developed vindictive personalities all because of Mr. Incredible rejecting him, despite being a little too harsh. So even though Mr. Incredible had rejected him in a harsh way, he doesn't deserve to have his whole family in danger. Ultimately, Mr. Incredible rejected him not only because he preferred to work solo, but also that it would have been irresponsible of him to take a child under his wing in a dangerous field of work. His ignorance and unawareness of the danger almost got himself killed by Bomb Voyage had Mr. Incredible not forgone apprehending him to save him, therefore he brought his own misery onto himself. Although Mr. Incredible could have handled it better, he still went far beyond the excuse. Even as a child, Syndrome is made clear to have already had self-serving desires and a total disregard for superhero principles. He believed that being a superhero was about wearing cool outfits and getting to beat people up, showing no real desire to help others. Essentially, Syndrome just cared for the "Super" part and not for the "Hero" one. This was proven when Syndrome tells Mr. Incredible that all he wanted is to help him, a flashback of Syndrome's memory is seen and the terrorist Bomb Voyage is absent from his mind. Therefore, although Mr. Incredible could have treated him better, perhaps even if Mr. Incredible had not rejected him, he would either still become a villain eventually, or at least an anti-hero as his reckless nature aside, Buddy's self-serving nature made him unworthy of being a hero. To be fair, however, he was a kid at the time, so he may not have understood what being a superhero really meant, though despite this, he didn't realize as he grew up that Mr. Incredible wasn't in the wrong, and even if he didn't want to forgive Mr. Incredible for his harsh treatment on him, that didn't justify going after supers who had nothing to do with his rejection. Also, when he recalled on how Mr. Incredible treated him that time, he omitted Bomb Voyage's presence and made his quote ("Fly home, Buddy. I work alone.") in a condescending tone rather than for his own good. As Woody points out, Lotso's backstory, while somewhat pitiful, doesn't justify anything he did. No matter how much Daisy "abandoning and replacing" him hurt him, his actions surpassed the excuse because: The reason why she replaced him was because he was her favorite toy and she lost him purely by accident, not because she didn't love him. Also, her parents are the ones to blame since they did not pick up her toys when she fell asleep and bought a replacement for her instead of going back to find him. Then again, replacing their child's lost toy rather than going out of their way to retrieve it in a remote location makes sense from an adult's perspective. He forced Chuckles and Big Baby to leave Daisy and join him in his suffering, even though they weren't even replaced at all, only him. Big Baby would spend years assuming he had been replaced too. Even when Chuckles tried to point out the truth about his replacement as well, he didn't listen and instead furiously insisted that she replaced all of them. To summarize it, he was the one who actually abandoned her and not the other way around, because as explained above, he forced his two former friends to run away from her even if they weren't replaced at all. The toys that he took his anger out on had nothing to do with him getting replaced and him abandoning her at all, with his horrendous treatment of them being his way of angrily lashing out at everyone else with the mindset that if he can't be happy, no one can, also when he left Woody and his gang to burn to death in the incinerator, all his sympathy was thrown out of the window. The animators also admitted that they increased Lotso's cruelty in the final version of the film in order to ensure that people understood that he deserved his defeat in the end. While her getting banished by King Triton sometime before the events of the franchise could be seen as a bit tragic, it is never played for sympathy nor does it justify her actions in any way, as she simply wants to overthrow him and take control of Atlantica herself instead of simply ruling by his side. Not to mention that she is not against turning him into a polyp (which is considered a fate worse than death) just to get what she wants. There's no proof of mistreatment from Triton so you can't put the accusing finger on him. Shere Khan also puts fear into other animals and show sadistic pleasure in doing it and hunts for pleasure and malice as opposed to survival according to Kaa's dislike which also makes him a villain besides his hatred of Man. Since Yzma stated that she practically raised Kuzco, it's obvious that he became selfish thanks to his upbringing by her which means that she's always bad before getting fired. We like the original Disney Peter Pan film and book the way they are including Peter Pan as the main protagonist and Captain Hook the main villain regardless of the boy's flaws so no swap is needed. Most of the time, Disney Villains are never misguided, just evil despite reasons and even then, they don't excuse their actions so they're mostly wrong and never right. Hopefully no more villains who are right things in future for you to correct yourself and the info I show to you will help you see and understand things.
Majority if not all of these are a very large stretch. Just because they may have small relatable points. Doesn't mean their actions or behaviors are by any means appropriate. Can't just say, "well they felt this and that" and blah blah blah. Then expect us to accept their terrible behavior and actions.
If anything they are creating more victims like them. Much to say they have bad desires of their own and given slightest chance won't hesitate to strike back.
Lotso: “trauma response”? I understand that he went through a rough time after being forgotten by Daisy (his original owner), but how can that explain why he simply left the toys on the conveyor belt to fall into the incinerator? It doesn’t add up
Not to mention mistreating the toys in Sunnyside who had nothing to do with his backstory. He also dragged Chuckles and Big Baby despite that he's the only one replaced.
Also he was replaced not because Daisy hated him but because he was the favorite toy and lost completely on accident. With no knowledge of toys being sentient naturally a new lotso would've been bought. Note that Chuckles and Big Baby we're not replaced, only Lotso
Bruh wanted to be sold to be looked at by all. Woody wanted to get back to the kid who loved him Pete wasn’t even seeing residuals he just wanted some attention on him again
I agree with Shenzi, Banzai & Ed Imagine being kicked out of ur home and being left to starve for possibly years? We have no idea how long they had gone without food, and someone all of a sudden came up to u and promised u tons of food if u followed their lead? Would u not do what they say? They were hungry and Scar promised them that they’d never go hungry again as long as he was king. That’s just my opinion anyway
No. 15, Woody: "Lotso, she was like 5 okay. And she didn't replace you, her parents did. And they only replaced you 'because' Daisy loved you so much. Lots O'Hugging Bear: "You're right, all this time I've been angry for nothing. I'm sorry, everybody." Rex: "Yeah, if anyone should be furious it should: Big Baby or Chuckles. They didn't replaced at all."
I don't think Ursula gets to be counted in this. Yes, Ariel signed the contract willingly. HOWEVER - Ariel was going to quite easily fulfill her end of the deal, but Ursula deliberately sabotaged it. Ariel didn't try to back out of the deal she agreed to, she was going to win, but Ursula went out of her way to interfere.
I don't see Denhai as evil at all, he wasn't like that until he thought he lost both Sitka and Kenai... actually, he was the one trying to stop Kenai taking revenge on Sitka in the 1st place. It's Kenai that left him no choice but to be this way - if he wasn't this stubborn, none of it would have happened. Kenai in my opinion in a way reminds me of Kuzco the main character who's actually the reason many of the bad stuff happened in the 1st place and we just get the chance to see them evolving and changing for the better. had both of them behaved better and smarter - they wouldn't find themselves in this situation. again - that's my opinon (and i am a sucker for BOTH films of Brother Bear)
While it is true the contract Ursula had was binding, she did sabotage Ariel's efforts in the midst of her getting closer to Eric. So..... not exactly what I'd call completely justified/fair. Also, Kuzco's way or ruling was influenced by Yzma. If supplemental material is taken into account. His parents died and she did raise him. And the way she treats people is much the same as him at the start.
Also Yzma was shown to be doing Kuzco's job and being even more selfish. Kuzco was an asshole sure but he even told Pacha to move the village and clearly never would let his people starve
The fortune was left to the Duchess and her kittens Marie, Berlioz, and Toulouse which means any kittens born from Marie, Berlioz, or Toulouse would inherit the fortune. So Edgar would never inherit the fortune because it would belong to the generations of kittens born from Marie, Berlioz, and Toulouse.
On the aristocats one. It's not unheard of in several places in the world to write pets as heritants and people as their steward, it's a construction to guarantee the animals' wellbeing. The steward gets access to the resources for all practical purposes. What the cats would do with the money is let their steward manage the house, and pay himself a reasonable salary until they go
I really feel for Goob. It all could have worked out if he or the mc talked about it. He should have switched rooms. People be more inclined to listen in on others feelings.
Tbf goob never wanted that kind of thing from the start. He just wanted Lewis to feel his pain not ruin the world. He does change completely when Lewis wakes him up first so that way he can have a better future
Dark Path. Sure, I don’t exactly call throwing eggs at your old roommate’s home a “dark path” but being used by Doris, invented by Lewis, is. Doris might be a hat but she uses Michael to get revenge on her inventor but Michael didn’t want that kind of revenge
I’ve never believed that Maleficent was motivated by ‘not being invited’. She didn’t care about that. She just wanted to rob the kingdom of its future by cursing their newborn princess. Her goal is to make as many people miserable as possible.
I may be wrong, but I think to not be invited to a christening, especially a royal christening would have been a pretty big insult back in the day. So, for them to not just invite her by mistake but actually snub her, that would be a lot to get mad at. Of course, she still is the villain.
@@JD10503 in the original tale, people thought she's been dead because *no one has heard of her for so long* , so it's still her fault for going incognito...
Yzma was no better a ruler than Kuzco. At the start of the movie, she tells the father of a starving family that he "should have thought of that before becoming peasants." And Callaghan losing his daughter does not justify him murdering Tadashi and attempting to kill Hiro and his other students.
Even though I understand WHY some of these characters did what did it still doesn't mean it was okay or justified per se some were just hurt or misunderstood but some were just bad or evil
Hades being worked in the underworld is a Grimm job and he hates it. Honestly, you can’t blame a guy that hates his job of his every day. Even not being like his brothers Zeus and Poseidon
But fairer question: Whose going to the job if not him? And also, both the movie and the tv series show that Hades is to blame for the standards of the underworld. Such as forcing the dead to float in the styx rather then go to an abode like in the myths. So really, if Hades's life is hell, its of his own making.
But it was zeus that sent he there to begin with even though hades should technically be the king of God's as he is the older brother and zeus is the youngest
Top ten Pixar characters we can identify them as mcu characters 1. Woody: captain America 2. Buzz lightyear: iron man 3. Bo peep: black widow 4. Sulley and mike: hulk, or groot and rocket 5.Jessie: Hawkeye 6. Lotso: thanos 7. The incredibles: the guardians of the galaxies or black widows family 8. Boo: baby groot or Cassie lang (the young version) 9. Hopper: thanos 10. Flit: Scott lang
I have to disagree with shere khan the tiger being justified. The only reason he has it out for humans is because he wants to stay at top of the food chain in the jungle, he knows that humans are above tigers in the food chain, so he wants to get rid of the kid. It has nothing to do with him wanting the jungle and it’s animals to be safe from humans.
You know, when looking at things from Sid Phillips' point of view, I can see him psychologically as either a surgeon or an engineer, like my Papa! Maybe if he would not be psychologically scarred by the alive toys, if the toys were not sentient, he would probably grow up with a pretty well-paying job. Maybe as he matures, he'd probably be a pretty good, decent-at-worst, co-worker with my Papa at Textron. And on the case of Maleficent... yeah, if I were the king, I would invite Maleficent over to Aurora's baby shower. Even as a villain, though, I think she's quite a charismatic character, with her majestic appearance, and Elanor Audley's voice, I would probably invite her, even with a little... tips for her, like try not to scare the baby, but make her dramatic appearance as she wishes. Maybe request some entertainment from her too.
Sorry, but Sid from Toy Story WAS wrong. You seem to have missed that a lot of those toys he destroyed were NOT, in fact, his. They were his SISTER’S. So he was completely in the wrong.
I have to disagree on the subject Ursula. Even though she never made Ariel do anything she didn’t want to do, she sabotaged almost every aspect of the deal to work in her favor
You forgot Stinky Pete in Toy Story 2. He convinces Woody that is loving rightful owner Andy is growing up and will eventually out grow him. And we all know what ended up happening in toy Story 3 and 4.
@@DavidBContentExtravaganza3967 the bad guys wouldn't show restraint simply because there's a kid in the room. Besides, even if Mr. Incredible was looking for/considering getting a sidekick, Buddy was too young despite his intelligence. I personally think that there's an unspoken rule about a minimum age limit when it comes to recruiting new heroes or sidekicks.
Also, your quip about maleficint "if you didn't want to invite her, you should have kept it as a small party" gives off victim blaming vibes. "Well if you didn't want your child to die in the shooting, you should have had them befriend the shooter!"
I have to give some support to Syndrome. I totally agree that he felt insulted ,and that told him that superheroes suck and need to be eliminated for a good cause, but when he decided to kill Bob's family by sending bullets to the plane, That totally crossed the line.
I literally never comment on a WatchMojo video. They usually have a pretty good grasp on reality with their lists. But there is a first time for everything. There's no way you all can look at Sid and try to convince me that he was "just a kid" "not hurting anyone", etc. He bullied his little sister and other children, taking their stuff (stealing) and butchering them. He did not know the toys were alive, but he liked to believe they were while he tortured them, frequently talking about them as if they were going to respond while he burned, deconstructed and otherwise destroyed them. he didn't have the makings of a surgeon or anything of the sort. Those types of people usually find joy in "operating" on their toys and successfully recuperating them. He displayed textbook future psychopath behaviors. Also props for being so blind as to call Sid "just a kid" for the crap he does while protecting child manipulators (Ursula) Attempted Child murderers (Shere Kahn) And Nepoticide (Hades). Like I get it. A lot of Disney villains are likeable for some reason or another, but to title this list as "Right all along" is BS
In Greek Mythology, Hades felt like the only normal god there. If you look at what the other gods are doing, especially Zeus, Hades is Kida the gentleman here
You guys are completely WRONG about Hades. He wasn't BANISHED to the underworld, he was ASSIGNED the underworld. SOMEONE has to manage the dead, after all. Hades wanted to take over Olympus for S&Gs
For Sleeping Beauty, during that timeframe it was actually considered incredibly rude not to invite someone to events like a christening. It was a huge slight on Maleficent to not invite her, regardless of how they felt about her
I blame the writers for not allowing denahi to hear his brother's voice inside the bear's body. If that was possible, then denahi would have realized the truth sooner
Captain Gantu: Retire? But I’m too young to retired! Grand Councilwoman: Captain Gantu, When I said I’m retiring you, I mean I’m fireing you! Captain Gantu: You mean I’m fired? But Grand Councilwoman! Grand Councilwoman: No buts!
The answer is Scar. Yes, Mufasa turned out to be a great king and Scar was absolutely wrong for killing him, but what if Mufasa wasn't go great? He was only king because of birth order, and Simba only inherited the kingdom because he was the oldest son of the son. I feel like most of the world has already figured this out about monarchies, but...That's a really messed up way to do things. What if the leaders/future leaders are incompetent or corrupt? They get to be in charge just because of birth order and gender? What could go wrong? (I think the history books show us what could go wrong.) The only way to save the kingdom would be to do something like Scar did. In the case of "The Lion King," Scar turned out to be the evil one, but what if he wasn't evil? What if Mufasa and/or Simba were evil? Then Scar's actions would have been justified. While he went about it in the wrong way, Scar wasn't wrong in his opinion that the birthright system is extremely flawed. Theoretically, how is it fair that he never had a chance to be king? Just because his brother fathered a son? The fate of the entire kingdom depended on what kind of child (if any) Mufasa had.
One that should have been on here is Finding Nemo. The dentist wasn't trying to kidnap Nemo he actually thought he was saving him and his niece Darla wasn't trying to kill the fish she thought they were sleeping. She loved fish!
Sid from Toy Story will never be redeemable in my eyes. He may be be creative, but the act of dismembering toys and reattaching them is the first sign of a sociopath. Next, he'll upgrade to animals and before you know it, we'll have another Jeffrey Dahmer on our hands
![Digital Circus Episode 4 [TRAILER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/abZtsmMUbJo/mqdefault.jpg)
![Twenty One Pilots - “The Line” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E2Rj2gQAyPA/mqdefault.jpg)
Which Disney villains do YOU think were right? Let us know below, and check out our video of the Top 20 Disney Characters Who Are Actually the Villain - ruclips.net/video/qPeBG5GCgFw/видео.html
Actually maleficent was invited to the party it was one of the fairies fault they didn't deliver her invitation right so saying she wasn't wanted was actually not right she actually was wanted at the party turns out the fairy was too scared to go into maleficent's Castle so if the fairy hadn't been afraid to deliver maleficent's Castle she would n't she wouldn't have a reason to put her curse upon the princess so if the fairy apologize to maleficent
You were 100% wrong on Sid; he was a mean, mean kid. He needed a spanking.
I agree with you about captain Hook as the misunderstood character but the one thing I don't know you know is someone actually did what you said about switching pan and hook's about but it was also different in the same time and that series is called once upon a time although you don't see hook till the second session I think and pan till second three and again I think as can't remember at this time.
Auto Pilot
@@marcuslynn3961 he almost gave me nightmares. He was a pretty evil kid.
Even though Skinner was exploiting Gusteau's name for proffit, he was still just doing his job, trying to keep a clean and irderly kitchen. Reporting Remy to the healt department was totally justified. If he were more pleasant to be around, you'd really feel sorry for him.
Agreed
Yeah, true.
Frozen meal business is good. Considering Skinner was doing it after the death of a famous chief, it is t hard to imagine he’s doing it in case the restaurant does go out of business. Matpat was right about Skinner.
I understand why Skinner made that choice to make profit, the restaurant was falling apart and was doing what he can to keep the business alive, he just went about it the wrong way. I wouldn't want my promised inheritance to go to someone incompetent either. I think if Linguini showed more competence, Skinner would've let it happen but also would've tried to found a way to make more profit out of it.
@@loganentertainment1814
Danganronpa protagonist: I agree with that.
Ursula was actively sabotaging Ariel (in the lake and with the brainwashing of Eric) so she wasn't exactly in the right.
I honestly don't know why this channel sympathizes with Ursula. It's implied she was banished in the first place because she manipulates people.
@@vetarlittorf1807 I know, right? This channel doesn’t seem to understand that Ursula was a manipulative control freak who wrongfully kills merpeople who failed to pay the price. It’s like scamming or bamboozling people out of their money, even if it contributes to their unexpected execution.
Saying Ursula was in the right is basically like taking the gaslighter's side
@@vetarlittorf1807: Exactly. That means Ursula shouldn't even be on here XD
@vetarlittorf1807 gonna be this guy but.... it's probably because the character of Ursula is based on a drag queen. And thus lots of people now are more sympathetic for the warped reason that they think she's a victim or just seeing her as a Trans symbol.
Even though he died, Syndrome was right when he said nobody would be super if everybody was
@angiereyes7856plus he was putting people in danger by using the omnidroid
@@LegoReader12345hello Not to mention terrorizing Mr. Incredible’s family by shooting missiles while they were aboard a plane and nonchalantly allowing Mr. Incredible to crush Mirage, who was willing to sacrifice her well-being to help him. Syndrome is clearly an ungrateful supervillain.
@@pbsfundingaddict790His descent into villainy ought to serve as a cautionary tale about letting one's ego get the best of oneself as well as a lesson in taking no for an answer.
Selling his inventions to the highest bidder once he “had his fun “ doesn’t make Syndrome a man of the people as much as some believe.
He had no qualms allowing children to die when he launched a missile at Helens plane nor did he blink when Mirages life was threatened
Likewise he wouldn’t care he’d be selling weapons and technology to really shady individuals if they paid the right price
I don’t care what he says, everyone needs a hero 🦸 🦸♀️ 🦸♂️.
I loved how much of a father figure John Silver was to Jim in Treasure Planet. He may have been a pirate, but he had the heart of a good man.
He had a heart of gold. Guess you could say that his heart was the real treasure all along
@@WannabeArtist55 absolutely
I agree with Gabby Gabby. She's not really malicious, and desperately wants to be played with. At least she gets a happy ending.
Ya even when I saw Toy Story four for the first time I never saw her as evil
Heck, she even bonded a lot with Forky
although at first she gave me vibes of looking like a villain, she really only wanted the love of a kid, and yeah she yes was very friendly with Forky
Look at How Toy Story 4 ruined everything
@@nicholassims9837 No it didn't. It showed the point of view of toys that actually don't mind being lost. A toy created from trash, toys that were left in an antique shop, as well as plush dolls that never get played with because the carnival games are rigged.
And in the end it was Woody's choice to make his own life decisions
A better title for this video should have been "villains who have a point" rather than villains were right all along because the current title makes it sound like everything they said was correct. Even when it's so blatantly obvious it was self-serving and used to manipulate the heroes
Yeah, bad decision! 😢
Agreed
But doesn't every villain has a point? A villains point decide a person's path towards heroism
She means that while the villain was wrong, it’s the heroes fault that they have to do this. If only they weren’t so selfish, this wouldn’t have happened.
@@LoganHaley-c4y You calling the heroes selfish?! I don't like people who do give characters Ron the deatheater treatment.
I gotta disagree with Ursula. True Ariel could have swam away, but Ursula cheated. She had no intention of letting Ariel win. It was all a ploy to get the throne.
Honestly that defense is more in line with the sea witch from the fairy tale since the sea witch was honest from the start and never interfered with the mermaid’s attempts at winning the prince.
Yep, Ursula cheated. She hated humans and we can’t forget that she killed innocent merpeople who were unable to pay the price. Were it not for King Triton, Ursula would’ve gotten away with it and Ariel and Eric would’ve never been a married couple and Ariel would’ve still been a human. The throne is a privilege, not a right.
Also Ariel is a minor, and contracts with minors aren't binding, the very moment the go nope they don't want to continue the contract is null and void... however went triton co-signed that made it binding to him
Cheating or not, she's still a fab villian. 🎉❤
@@dieterdelange9488 Can't argue with that!
Nope. Ursula manipulated the whole situation to make sure that she was there to pick up the pieces. Just because Ariel signed away her voice willingly doesn't mean she was pure in intent. She clearly wasn't when she tried to take over Triton's kingdom.
I agree with you. Ursula is a manipulative control freak who tricked Ariel into trading her voice for human legs and had killed broke merpeople who failed to pay the price. Now that’s a murderer if I’ve seen one.
@@pbsfundingaddict790she didn't kill them, she turned them into those weird creatures that are into her entrance that tried to stop Ariel from going to see her. But because they looked creepy Ariel simply was spooked and didn't understand what they wanted. She even warned Ariel that's what will happen to her if she fails during her song poor unfortunate souls with pictures. And that's what she turned her into when she failed. And that's what she turned Triton when he chose to take Ariel's place. She was very manipulative, BUT she never lied or killed anyone, at least in the animated version.
@@Magelog490
She literally cheated to ensure Ariel can't win 💀
That's just how villains are, but at least Ursula wasn't a liar. And that contract was legal at all terms, and would have been whether it was by her will or not.
Right. If Ursula hadn't interfered with Ariel's wooing of Eric, then Ursula would've been right all along. However, she had her minions actively sabotage Ariel's efforts even going so far as to brainwashing Eric so that Ariel would run out of time and then be held accountable to the terms of the contract. That then allowed her to make a play for Triton's throne. Was Ursula's plan genius? Yes. Was she correct in doing it? No.
Well to be fair, Yzma was overstepping her bounds by doing Kuzko's job so her being fired was kind of justified whether of not what of kind of person Kuzko was.
to be specific, in all probability Yzma was increasingly ignoring the other half of her regency job (reporting/doing proper paperwork and asking Kuzco's opinion before actually implementing stuff)
She even said that she practically raised Kuzco which probably didn't help his " it's all about me" attitude growing up
True, Kuzco may have been a jerk at that time, but Yzma really deserved it.
Not to mention how she was the one who made Kuzco into the way he was, which makes it more the ironic that he fires her.
And the one time they showed her doing "his"job she was not caring, in saying "well you shouldn't have been born poor"
"After all...I am your biggest fan" will always be an iconic line
😆 lol
Robert Callaghan was right, but, as seen in a previous video, he went to extremes to avenge his daughter’s supposed death. In the end, he got to see his daughter again, but he carted off to jail shortly after.
Meanwhile Hiro is still left without a brother due to his actions so it ends up feeling a bit uneven in the end imo.
For what it’s worth, Callahan addresses the Tadashi tragedy at the end of the series’ first season when Hiro went to inquire about a separate matter in incarceration. Callahan concluded by saying he hopes that Hiro could find it within him to forgive him. Hiro didn’t immediately, but hoped to follow suit eventually. As far as we know, he never did.
What the professor did was terrible, selfish and unforgivable. Besides just because he lost his daughter doesn’t mean she’s dead.
"You can't have heroes and villains when the wrong side is making the best sense." Roger Ebert on "I am Sam."
It’s funny that Hades is a “villain” because he really is passive in Greek mythology
Contrary to popular belief, Syndrome was not right all along. Now allow me to explain.
As we know, when he was Buddy Pine, all he wanted was to join Mr. Incredible and help him out, but Mr. Incredible kept refusing and rejecting him, which drove him to villainy. However, it never occurred to Buddy that his hero was only trying to protect him. After all, being a superhero can be dangerous, especially for children. If Mr. Incredible did let Buddy join him, he would have been allowing him to put his life in danger. Not to mention, Buddy had already proven how unfit he was to be super as he clearly didn't realize there's more to being super than cool suits, gadgets and beating up bad guys. If his massive ego hadn't prevented him from realizing the dangers of being super and that Mr. Incredible just wanted him safe, he wouldn't have turned bad. So really, it's Buddy's fault he turned bad. Though I do agree that Mr. Incredible could have been much more nicer about rejecting him.
True, Mr. Incredible should have explained it to him instead of pushing him away and yelling at him, then maybe buddy would have understood and not been evil.
The "Self-Serving Memory" page on TVTropes takes this a step further: "While Syndrome guilts Mr. Incredible into thinking he was wrong to have rejected him as a sidekick, his flashback conveniently omits all the problems _he_ caused that night. The scene of Mr. Incredible telling Buddy that he works alone is a particularly interesting example: In the actual events, Mr. Incredible was struggling against a supervillain named Bomb Voyage while trying to both apprehend the villain and convince Buddy to leave the dangerous situation. In Syndrome's flashback, Mr. Incredible's pose and tone is far more condescending and dismissive, and Bomb Voyage is entirely absent, making it seem like Mr. Incredible was pushing Buddy away for no reason at all."
@@TheMaskGamer2007 The thing is although Mr. Incredible could have treated him better, perhaps even if Mr. Incredible had not rejected him, he would either still become a villain eventually, or at least an anti-hero as his reckless nature aside, Buddy's self-serving nature made him unworthy of being a hero.
@@TheMaskGamer2007 He yelled at Buddy right after his antics let Bomb Voyage get away and almost killed dozens if not hundreds of people by exploding a bridge. He was rightfully pissed that Buddy was so sure of himself that he didn't even realize what a big mess he made.
There's a reason you don't let 10 year old drive or vote. I remember as kid accidentally destroying a portion of plant while playing was big enough reason to get yelled at. If getting mad like this I would be buddy 100x.
“Cutting your hand off was only a childish prank” yeah because it’s normal for a kid to sever someone’s limbs
Hook was justified in hating Peter but going after anyone else was wrong especially when he kidnapped Jane in the second movie.
@@tanandalynch9441Whom he thought was Wendy at first but the point still stands. You are correct.
I’m sorry, Sid was horrible and Lotso had his chance for redemption but threw it away. I feel bad for what happened to him, but proved himself irredeemable when he left the toys to be incinerated.
The filmmakers never intended to make Lotso sympathy when they made his backstory so they increased his cruelty to have that thrown out the window and assure people that his defeat is well deserved.
Agree with the Lotso comment but disagree with Sid is still just a mentally challenged kid
Syndrome formerly known as “Incrediboy” went from the Mr. Incredible fanboy to the genius villain and a murderer in 2004’s ‘The Incredibles’, one of my top 3 favorite Pixar movies.
2094
@@NevLither
Oops. 😅🤣
@@justapeacefulmanwhosbornin7291 My Top 3 Pixar movies are
🥇 Toy Story 1
🥈 Toy Story 2
🥉 A Bug’s Life
Plus when he was still "Incrediboy" Mr. Incredible really saved his life when he took off the bomb that Bombvoyage had put on his cape when he went for the police (simply choosing to save him instead of defeating the villain)
It’s worth noting that the sea witch in “The Little Mermaid” by Hans Christian Andersen isn’t as evil and manipulative as Ursula.
Sure, the conditions that the sea witch laid out for the mermaid were harsh and bloody, but she never lied to the little mermaid about them.
The sea witch never interfered with the mermaid’s plans to win the prince’s heart.
However, when the little mermaid was unable to win the prince’s heart, the mermaid’s sisters were able to renegotiate the deal with the sea witch by trading in their locks of hair in exchange for a dagger that the mermaid would plunge into the prince’s heart in order to turn her back into a mermaid as opposed to sea foam.
Furthermore, the little mermaid went to the sea witch on her own volition (as opposed to escaping an abusive father); and the sea witch initially refused to allow the mermaid become human for the prince only to then give in despite the sea witch’s warnings to the little mermaid that it would lead to heartbreak.
Thank you for actually doing your research
@@Wiiguy1606 That’s more than I can say for the filmmakers of “The Little Mermaid” (1989) who most likely didn’t read, let alone understood, the source material.
I’m honestly convinced that Disney’s decision to turn “The Little Mermaid” into a romantic comedy was due to the success of “Splash”, a 1984 fantasy rom-com about a mermaid (played by Daryl Hannah) who falls for the first human guy she saves from drowning (played by Tom Hanks) and then acquires legs in order to be with him on land for a few days, even though she can’t talk.
“Splash” was released under Disney’s adult facing label “Touchstone Films”, so yes, “Splash” counts as a Disney movie.
And sure, the fairy tale “The Little Mermaid” predates “Splash” by a century, but there are some elements in Disney’s “The Little Mermaid” that did not exist in the fairy tale but did exist in “Splash”:
- Ariel swimming through a sunken ship
- Ariel being fascinated by a music box featuring a dancing couple on it
- Ariel exhibiting terrible table manners while wearing a nice pink dress on her dinner date with Prince Eric in which the main course is some form of crustacean
- Ariel transforming into a mermaid while wearing a nice blue dress in front of everyone including Prince Eric
- Prince Eric chasing after Ariel in the water to save her from the bad guys during the film’s climax
@@beethovensfidelio Well filmmakers aren't exactly obligated to follow every plot point to the letter and they do their own takes sometimes which is why a lot of media based on existing material isn't done verbatim. It's why there is many different versions of things wether it be movies, TV Shows or video games etc.
@@beethovensfidelio No. They did read and understand the source material. That much is clear with how the first act follows very similar story beats. However, they just wanted a more secular and happier version.
358: Denahi isn’t exactly a villain but he wasn’t aware of his brother’s transformation. I love it that he gets mentioned
Ursula cheated to win though. That's not right. Especially after she gave Ariel tools advice to get Eric after she questions giving up her voice.
For Maleficent you have to keep in mind she's also a member of the Fae. So some fairies getting invited while another was "not wanted" breaks fairy hospitality laws(which are mandatory, even if you're not informed) so Maleficent was following her own laws as they are within their rights to curse any member of the offending party.
I can’t help to think if I was a villain I would be the likes of Shere Khan. We both have the “whatever humans touch they destroy”mentality
Agreed
No way, I can't agree on BALTHAZAR. Just because he worked for Madame for an extended period doesn't mean he's entitled to her ENTIRE estate. Normally in these situations there would be a generous lump sum set aside for him - commiserate with his longevity and diligence, but that's IT; he was an employee, neither friend nor family. Madame was entitled to give HER money to whomever she so chooses... no matter how outrageous the amount or how seemingly silly. Absolutely NOT 'misunderstood.'
Right that’s like what if she left her money for her kids was he go try to take out the kids lol
The one thing that I love about all these Disney villains is that even though their motives for villainy are all different they are all also understandable. Some of the characters on this list may not have chosen to be villains but for some of them being bad feels so good.
But we also remember that it doesn't excuse their actions mostly.
I always sympathized with Gantu, even as a kid. He was just a soldier taking orders and ended up being fired for the one time he failed a mission
Yeah, Gantu wasn't even doing anything that malicious towards our heroes in Lilo and Stitch neither, at least not as bad. but it still just feels as though you can't help but feel sorry for this big guy. Especially with how much abuse he would eventually had to endure when he decided to work with Dr. Hanstaveil in both Stitch the Movie and Lilo and Stitch the Series. In hindsight, Gantu is definitely one of the most underrated sympathetic villains in the Disney canon.
Personally I don't see Gantu as a villain but rather an antagonist due to not really doing any actions that can be considered evil.
In my personal opinion the real villain in the original Lilo & Stitch movie was the Grand Councilwoman not Captain Gantu. the end result of his mission makes him out to be an anti-hero not a villain. if I were in his shoes when told that he was being fired for failing a single mission I'd go off script and slap the Grand Councilwoman in the face and say "you think you can fire me? well you can't fire me and you won't because I quit."
@@RevanSecuraIf he did that hell go to jail
@@nicholassims9837 well put yourself in his shoes would you put up with such a decision from the boss of any job much less an intergalactic empress like the Grand Councilwoman?
I can feel Captain Hook's pain.
Need a hand oh wait 😅
@@PrincessKnightNekolucario8742 Except for me, I didn't loos my hand to a alligator, I went through so much hell as a kid and everyone saw me as a bad guy even tho I wasn't.
Thanks also to that fateful encounter, Hook has horophobia (the fear of clocks).
Wasn't he always the way he is even before he met Peter Pan An evil parate who keeps stealing and trying to conquer Neverland
Maleficent was actually entitled to a invitation. Based on the time period, the birth of an heir was something that'd even call a ceasefire in wars because you invite all neighboring monarchy to the event.
Exactly. And the "You aren't wanted" was the main reason why she went for such a strong punishment. King and Queen should have stepped in and apologize for the fairy (which they even invited). Insulting one of the most powerful persons around the kingdom wasnt very smart
With Ursula, while Ariel DID go to her willingly, the only reason she failed was because Ursula took her own human form, hypnotized Eric, and used Ariel's voice to trick him on the last day. Not to mention her minions (probably on her orders) interrupted the kiss during the song "Kiss the Girl".
Yes since Ursula always rigged the deals to make the merfolk failed in paying the price and turn them into polyps.
Exactly she's a villain because she was doing everything she can to use Ariel to get to Triton and his power
Thank you for saying that. That part had me very upset. I'm like, did Miss MOJO watch the movie
I disagree with Lotso. He was the only toy who was replaced by Daisy. 6:51
Couldn’t agree more. He took his anger out on other toys, especially Big Baby, Chuckles and Andy’s toys. Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully belonged to Daisy, but Lotso let his disappointment completely consume him and snatched the two innocent toys away from Daisy. It’s ridiculous how he turned Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and issued wrongful punishments against Andy’s toys for attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and showing connections to their owners. Most importantly, he nearly killed Andy’s toys at the incinerator even after Woody and Buzz saved his life. Lotso is ultimately a spiteful toy with a heart made of stone incapable of redemption.
I say the same, he took out all his anger towards others, becaming in a monster, mistreating and hating the new toys
@@BG-be8di I agree with you. What Lotso did was virtually inexcusable and unforgivable compared to this.
- Even though he was once a loving, kind-hearted and caring friend of Big Baby and Chuckles, all of that changed completely the moment he saw Daisy with another Lotso, turning himself into a wrathful and abusive tyrant who imprisoned innocent toys for pleasure. While he justified his actions to Buzz by saying that children in the caterpillar room, he later admitted he sent toys to the caterpillar room so they’ll be thrown away.
- He transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a depressing prison where he forces toys who are lower in the pecking order to be beaten, abused and played with roughly by the younger kids, eventually causing them to break, at which point they get sent to the dumpster and are likely incinerated. Toys that defy Lotso are placed into the sandbox. He even has this happen to Mr. Potato Head and lets Ken see to it happening twice. He's also providing a cutting and choking hazard for the kids by providing them with age-inappropriate toys in the first place. This makes his torture unique compared to Sid, who was kind of a jerk to his sister, but had no idea that toys were alive.
- It is implied that he had Chuckles beaten, broken and even injured after he decided that he wasn't going to have any part of Lotso's empire, despite him being his friend.
- He brainwashed Buzz Lightyear into becoming one of his henchmen when the latter refused to join the Butterfly Room alone, manipulating him into thinking Andy's toys are helpers of Emperor Zurg and then having him beat down and lock up his own friends all while smiling maliciously.
- When he finds out that Andy's toys have escaped and saw that Chatter Telephone was involved in this, he and his gang tortured and injured him to confess their whereabouts until he told him that the protagonists are at the dumpster.
- After Big Baby hears the truth about Daisy from Woody, Lotso (who had continuously lied to him over the years about her not loving them anymore and replacing them while also pretending to be his father figure) smashes his pendant before violently poking him with his mallet in front of everyone else, including his own minions whom Lotso calls dummies.
- He orders Stretch to push Woody and the other toys into the dumpster. Amongst said other toys is Ken, whom Lotso personally throws there with as a petty punishment just for loving Barbie. Even his henchmen are disgusted by this; hence, Stretch doesn't like being called a dummy and watching his friend Ken be abused, and never tries to push the toys as he was ordered to.
- He drags Woody into the dumpster so that he can make sure the cowboy dies along with him.
- He leaves Andy's toys to die in the incinerator, despite Woody and Buzz risking their own lives to save him from the shredder earlier, thus he would have succeeded of having the toys massacred if not for the Aliens' intervention.
- Although his minions served him, Lotso doesn't even care about them because he only just used them as his slaves for following his orders and doing the horrible dirty work of ruling Sunnyside.
- As Woody points out, Lotso's backstory doesn't justify anything he did. No matter how much Daisy "abandoning" him hurt him, his actions surpassed the excuse because:
- The reason why Daisy replaced Lotso was because he was her favorite toy and she lost him purely by accident, not because she didn't love him.
- He forced Chuckles and Big Baby to run away from home and join him in his suffering, even though they weren't even replaced at all, only him. Big Baby would spend years assuming he had been replaced too. Even when Chuckles tried to point out the truth about Lotso's replacement as well.
- The toys that Lotso took his anger out on had nothing to do with him getting replaced at all.
- To summarize it, Lotso abandoned Daisy, not the other way around, due to not being able to accept someone else having her if he couldn't, making his motive a selfish one, and by extension, it turns his horrendous treatment of the other toys into his way of angrily lashing out at everyone else with the mindset that if he can't be happy, no one can. Also, when he left Woody and the gang to die, all the sympathy was thrown out of the window.
Yeah especially after he leaves Woody and rest to die in Inferno when he could stop it? Yeeaah no redemption or being right with this bear
@@jarjaxle Test audiences who sympathized with Lotso for his backstory wanted him to push the button in the incinerator scene to redeem himself. However, according to the DVD commentary, director Lee Unkrich explained that the filmmakers decided to drop Lotso's chance for redemption in order to make the audience who had gotten to know Andy's toys over the past fifteen years in three movies care about the heroes even more as they went to the fire when it looked like the end for them before the Pizza Planet Aliens rescued them with the claw. Another reason is because they did not want Lotso to get off so easy, so they just increased his cruelty to ensure to the audience that he deserved what he got in the end (being strapped to the grille of a garbage truck).
Syndrome is one of the best villains of animated movies , better than many villains of movies and he has good points
As a kid, I hated Disney Villains but as a grown up, I can understand them
WatchMojo-“Sid is developing skills surgeons, scientists, and engineers hone.”
Me-“And serial killers.”
Robert Callaghan may be a villain out for revenge but he is right to tell Hiro not to trust Keri
And despite his cruelty in telling Hiro that Tadashi's death was his own mistake, he does appear to be correct in saying so, as Tadashi chose to run into the SFIT building by himself, thus resulting in his death. That said as he acknowledges, nothing excused his callous way of saying it.
@@DavidBContentExtravaganza3967 Here's the thing though, it's unknown how the fire started or even if Callaghan attempted/refused to help Tadashi after he ran in to save him so hard to say if Callaghan is completely blameless in it.
@@Altoryu HE SET THE FIRE!! HE IS LITERALLY AN ARSONIST
@@Altoryu given how quickly the explosion happened after Tadashi went in, it would have been unlikely he got much beyond the entrance. That said, it doesn't alter the fact that Callaghan set the fire to start with; even if Tadashi didn't run in, he would have put first responders at risk, not to mention the possible environmental damage and health risks from the smoke created from who knows what at a science fair full of plastics and chemicals.
@@Altoryu I know that, just saying about the way he said it to Hiro instead of gentler.
I like how she defends the actions of Sid because she thinks there's nothing wrong his actions
Agreed and Sid’s behavior was perfectly normal for boys his age and he didn’t know that toys were alive. Sid can’t be that bad and is far from pure evil.
@@pbsfundingaddict790exactly, I mean no wonder he freaked out in the end, possibly because of what he’s done of his actions
It was sarcasm, of course his actions were wrong, are you stupid or something???
@@pbsfundingaddict790
No way, that kid was one step away from becoming a psychopath. First it’s toys, then little animals, and before you know it… people. I’ve watched a lot of Criminal Minds episodes.
@@chuumon95 As a little girl, I used to take apart Lego knights, turn them into giant scorpions, then organise Lego scorpion fights. Haven't murdered anyone yet. My two cats are spoilt rotten.
Fun fact: Sid is the garbage man from Toy Story 3. They even brought his original voice actor, Erik Von Detten, back for the role.
I like to think he saves toys from the garbage.
@@TCHorwood-xq7mw He does have a couple of them mounted onto his truck. :(
@@reikun86 That's a different truck.
Interested
OMG I didn’t know that
For Ursula, we don‘t know why she was banned and therefore we can‘t say, if her revenge plan was justified or not. In regard of Ariel, she lost her justified position at the moment, when she stole prince Eric from Ariel to guarantee, that Ariel would lose her part if the contract.
She lost any justification when she sent her eels to interfere.
For Sid
I believe I heard a theory that his father is abusive and drunk (seen in the commercial scene, he’s asleep but he could be passed out drunk ) so he takes his frustration out on the toys to let out the anger and pain he gets from his father
At least Gantu gets redemption and his job back
He gets fired again for bad karaoke singing and goes back to working for hampsterviel
@@michaeldillon8217 that was in the stitch anime, which is non canon
That's a fair point, since he ends up befriending Lilo and Stitch anyway and because he was just fighting for what he saw as justice.
I agree with you 100%
Now I can see why Edgar would want to get rid of the cats. He was loyal to the woman for I don’t know how many years, but she left her fortune to her cats. I mean…what are the cats are going to do with the money?
Edgar should have realized that cats can’t use money, he probably would still have the money, just has to dedicate money for the cats, like maintain them and care for them, then he would have the money when they pass away
@@LegoReader12345helloI blame her for that. She could've at least told Edgar that the money doesn't go to the Cats directly, but rather left the Money for Edgar to mainly take good care of them. And before that call, Edgar was nothing but nice to the Cats.
@@phillipwalling7470 to be fair she never knew Edgar was listening, perhaps she would have told him about the Will but he acted rashly
Peter Pan and Wendy kind of reversed the good guy and bad guy roles. It made Peter a bad friend and Hook a misunderstood character who just wanted to go home
Ironically
A villain in his own story Peter Pan
11:33 But Ursula did play dirty. Ariel almost got Eric to kiss her, but was foiled by Ursula’s eels. Then she put a spell on Eric to fall in love with the wrong girl.
Even when he was a child, his anger at Mr. Incredible rejecting him became heavily outweighed by his lack of regard for what a super means and self-serving desires. This is especially true since:
As a child, he was very reckless and ignorant; he went into Mr. Incredible's car without permission and even claimed that he didn't have to worry about training him because he, as Mr. Incredible's biggest fan, already knows his every move.
He simply assumed that the reason he was told to go home was because he had no superpowers, even though it's evident that it's much more because he was interfering while Mr. Incredible was trying to stop Bomb Voyage and that Mr. Incredible was worrying about his safety, which he exploited.
He believes that being a super is about wearing cool outfits and beating people up instead of saving lives. This shows that he had no desire to help other people and only wanted to be a super just for fame. Neither as a child or adult does he acknowledge that his recklessness nearly got himself and civilians on a train killed if it weren't for Mr. Incredible, leading to one of the lawsuits that forced supers into hiding.
The other supers whom he killed and the citizens he endangered with his Omnidroids had nothing to do with Mr. Incredible rejecting him at all.
While he didn't have a full understanding of what it means to be a superhero at the time, he developed vindictive personalities all because of Mr. Incredible rejecting him, despite being a little too harsh. So even though Mr. Incredible had rejected him in a harsh way, he doesn't deserve to have his whole family in danger.
Ultimately, Mr. Incredible rejected him not only because he preferred to work solo, but also that it would have been irresponsible of him to take a child under his wing in a dangerous field of work. His ignorance and unawareness of the danger almost got himself killed by Bomb Voyage had Mr. Incredible not forgone apprehending him to save him, therefore he brought his own misery onto himself. Although Mr. Incredible could have handled it better, he still went far beyond the excuse.
Even as a child, Syndrome is made clear to have already had self-serving desires and a total disregard for superhero principles. He believed that being a superhero was about wearing cool outfits and getting to beat people up, showing no real desire to help others. Essentially, Syndrome just cared for the "Super" part and not for the "Hero" one. This was proven when Syndrome tells Mr. Incredible that all he wanted is to help him, a flashback of Syndrome's memory is seen and the terrorist Bomb Voyage is absent from his mind. Therefore, although Mr. Incredible could have treated him better, perhaps even if Mr. Incredible had not rejected him, he would either still become a villain eventually, or at least an anti-hero as his reckless nature aside, Buddy's self-serving nature made him unworthy of being a hero. To be fair, however, he was a kid at the time, so he may not have understood what being a superhero really meant, though despite this, he didn't realize as he grew up that Mr. Incredible wasn't in the wrong, and even if he didn't want to forgive Mr. Incredible for his harsh treatment on him, that didn't justify going after supers who had nothing to do with his rejection. Also, when he recalled on how Mr. Incredible treated him that time, he omitted Bomb Voyage's presence and made his quote ("Fly home, Buddy. I work alone.") in a condescending tone rather than for his own good. As Woody points out, Lotso's backstory, while somewhat pitiful, doesn't justify anything he did. No matter how much Daisy "abandoning and replacing" him hurt him, his actions surpassed the excuse because:
The reason why she replaced him was because he was her favorite toy and she lost him purely by accident, not because she didn't love him. Also, her parents are the ones to blame since they did not pick up her toys when she fell asleep and bought a replacement for her instead of going back to find him. Then again, replacing their child's lost toy rather than going out of their way to retrieve it in a remote location makes sense from an adult's perspective.
He forced Chuckles and Big Baby to leave Daisy and join him in his suffering, even though they weren't even replaced at all, only him. Big Baby would spend years assuming he had been replaced too. Even when Chuckles tried to point out the truth about his replacement as well, he didn't listen and instead furiously insisted that she replaced all of them.
To summarize it, he was the one who actually abandoned her and not the other way around, because as explained above, he forced his two former friends to run away from her even if they weren't replaced at all.
The toys that he took his anger out on had nothing to do with him getting replaced and him abandoning her at all, with his horrendous treatment of them being his way of angrily lashing out at everyone else with the mindset that if he can't be happy, no one can, also when he left Woody and his gang to burn to death in the incinerator, all his sympathy was thrown out of the window. The animators also admitted that they increased Lotso's cruelty in the final version of the film in order to ensure that people understood that he deserved his defeat in the end. While her getting banished by King Triton sometime before the events of the franchise could be seen as a bit tragic, it is never played for sympathy nor does it justify her actions in any way, as she simply wants to overthrow him and take control of Atlantica herself instead of simply ruling by his side. Not to mention that she is not against turning him into a polyp (which is considered a fate worse than death) just to get what she wants. There's no proof of mistreatment from Triton so you can't put the accusing finger on him. Shere Khan also puts fear into other animals and show sadistic pleasure in doing it and hunts for pleasure and malice as opposed to survival according to Kaa's dislike which also makes him a villain besides his hatred of Man. Since Yzma stated that she practically raised Kuzco, it's obvious that he became selfish thanks to his upbringing by her which means that she's always bad before getting fired. We like the original Disney Peter Pan film and book the way they are including Peter Pan as the main protagonist and Captain Hook the main villain regardless of the boy's flaws so no swap is needed. Most of the time, Disney Villains are never misguided, just evil despite reasons and even then, they don't excuse their actions so they're mostly wrong and never right. Hopefully no more villains who are right things in future for you to correct yourself and the info I show to you will help you see and understand things.
I agree with you
@@chloeeng6811 Thanks. Just posting info for MsMojo and everyone else to know. Wikis can be helpful you know.
Majority if not all of these are a very large stretch. Just because they may have small relatable points. Doesn't mean their actions or behaviors are by any means appropriate. Can't just say, "well they felt this and that" and blah blah blah. Then expect us to accept their terrible behavior and actions.
If anything they are creating more victims like them. Much to say they have bad desires of their own and given slightest chance won't hesitate to strike back.
Especially with Ursula she literally cheated twice on the contract so Ariel failing was because Ursula made it
Lotso: “trauma response”? I understand that he went through a rough time after being forgotten by Daisy (his original owner), but how can that explain why he simply left the toys on the conveyor belt to fall into the incinerator? It doesn’t add up
Not to mention mistreating the toys in Sunnyside who had nothing to do with his backstory. He also dragged Chuckles and Big Baby despite that he's the only one replaced.
Also he was replaced not because Daisy hated him but because he was the favorite toy and lost completely on accident. With no knowledge of toys being sentient naturally a new lotso would've been bought. Note that Chuckles and Big Baby we're not replaced, only Lotso
Yeah, Lotso was straight up abusive and toxic towards the other toys! 😡😒
What about Stinky Pete from Toy Story 2? He was right when it's a dangerous world out there for toys and not being in good condition.
Bruh wanted to be sold to be looked at by all. Woody wanted to get back to the kid who loved him Pete wasn’t even seeing residuals he just wanted some attention on him again
At the end of Ratatouille all I could think of was the obscene amount of rat hair that must be in all the food
True 😅
According to TV Tropes this list would be an example of "Anti-Villain," "Villain Has a Point" and "Well-Intentioned Extremist."
I agree with Shenzi, Banzai & Ed
Imagine being kicked out of ur home and being left to starve for possibly years? We have no idea how long they had gone without food, and someone all of a sudden came up to u and promised u tons of food if u followed their lead? Would u not do what they say? They were hungry and Scar promised them that they’d never go hungry again as long as he was king. That’s just my opinion anyway
I understand that
who said anything
about anyone kicking
anyone outta their home?
@@noorbohamad5796 they were banished from the pride lands
No. 15, Woody: "Lotso, she was like 5 okay. And she didn't replace you, her parents did. And they only replaced you 'because' Daisy loved you so much.
Lots O'Hugging Bear: "You're right, all this time I've been angry for nothing. I'm sorry, everybody."
Rex: "Yeah, if anyone should be furious it should: Big Baby or Chuckles. They didn't replaced at all."
That was one of the first How It Should Have Ended videos I ever watched.
@@nathanielpatterson-rc9dq I saw it too
I don't think Ursula gets to be counted in this. Yes, Ariel signed the contract willingly. HOWEVER - Ariel was going to quite easily fulfill her end of the deal, but Ursula deliberately sabotaged it. Ariel didn't try to back out of the deal she agreed to, she was going to win, but Ursula went out of her way to interfere.
Twice mind you.
I don't see Denhai as evil at all, he wasn't like that until he thought he lost both Sitka and Kenai... actually, he was the one trying to stop Kenai taking revenge on Sitka in the 1st place. It's Kenai that left him no choice but to be this way - if he wasn't this stubborn, none of it would have happened. Kenai in my opinion in a way reminds me of Kuzco the main character who's actually the reason many of the bad stuff happened in the 1st place and we just get the chance to see them evolving and changing for the better. had both of them behaved better and smarter - they wouldn't find themselves in this situation.
again - that's my opinon (and i am a sucker for BOTH films of Brother Bear)
I mean, Evelyn being right all along is a reach. The supers weren’t vigilantes, they were federally recognized officers of the law.
Syndrome: "It's bigger! It's badder! Ladies and gentlemen, it's too much for Mr. Incredible! Whoa-hoa!"
While it is true the contract Ursula had was binding, she did sabotage Ariel's efforts in the midst of her getting closer to Eric. So..... not exactly what I'd call completely justified/fair.
Also, Kuzco's way or ruling was influenced by Yzma. If supplemental material is taken into account. His parents died and she did raise him. And the way she treats people is much the same as him at the start.
Also Yzma was shown to be doing Kuzco's job and being even more selfish. Kuzco was an asshole sure but he even told Pacha to move the village and clearly never would let his people starve
Edgar only had to take care of the cats then he would have inherited anyhow...
Right. Edgar was just dumb and impatient.
The fortune was left to the Duchess and her kittens Marie, Berlioz, and Toulouse which means any kittens born from Marie, Berlioz, or Toulouse would inherit the fortune. So Edgar would never inherit the fortune because it would belong to the generations of kittens born from Marie, Berlioz, and Toulouse.
@@Lilly-dg6xcoh so Edgar
really was just dumb and impatient AND GREEDY
Maleficent is truly one of the most scariest villas of Disney
So true
Sid is a psychopath... the stuff he did is what serial killers do after they grow up. Lotso was just Stalin as a bear.
On the aristocats one. It's not unheard of in several places in the world to write pets as heritants and people as their steward, it's a construction to guarantee the animals' wellbeing. The steward gets access to the resources for all practical purposes. What the cats would do with the money is let their steward manage the house, and pay himself a reasonable salary until they go
15:53 THAT WAS HIS STEAK 🥩.
BUT SID WAS ALSO BULLYING HIS SISTER AND DESTROYING HER TOYS 😡
Once again Syndrome is proven to be the greatest Pixar & Disney villain as he lands the number one spot.
How many times is he going to continue that? Plenty of awards to go.
I really feel for Goob. It all could have worked out if he or the mc talked about it. He should have switched rooms. People be more inclined to listen in on others feelings.
That’s facts but aye im glad he got retribution when Will came and woke him up. Now had he forgot the second time that would’ve justified him fasho
Tbf goob never wanted that kind of thing from the start. He just wanted Lewis to feel his pain not ruin the world.
He does change completely when Lewis wakes him up first so that way he can have a better future
Dark Path. Sure, I don’t exactly call throwing eggs at your old roommate’s home a “dark path” but being used by Doris, invented by Lewis, is. Doris might be a hat but she uses Michael to get revenge on her inventor but Michael didn’t want that kind of revenge
Sid Phillips: *Displays psychopathic behavioral traits.
This video: "He's gonna be a doctor one day!!!!"
I’ve never believed that Maleficent was motivated by ‘not being invited’. She didn’t care about that. She just wanted to rob the kingdom of its future by cursing their newborn princess. Her goal is to make as many people miserable as possible.
I may be wrong, but I think to not be invited to a christening, especially a royal christening would have been a pretty big insult back in the day. So, for them to not just invite her by mistake but actually snub her, that would be a lot to get mad at.
Of course, she still is the villain.
@@JD10503 in the original tale, people thought she's been dead because *no one has heard of her for so long* , so it's still her fault for going incognito...
Treasure Planet was such an underrated gem
Yzma was no better a ruler than Kuzco. At the start of the movie, she tells the father of a starving family that he "should have thought of that before becoming peasants."
And Callaghan losing his daughter does not justify him murdering Tadashi and attempting to kill Hiro and his other students.
URSULA’S CRAZY SISTER!
Lolololol I haven't seen the sequel in yeaaarrsss and remember next to nothing, but god damn, I remember that part for some reason! 🤣
Even though I understand WHY some of these characters did what did it still doesn't mean it was okay or justified per se some were just hurt or misunderstood but some were just bad or evil
Hades being worked in the underworld is a Grimm job and he hates it. Honestly, you can’t blame a guy that hates his job of his every day. Even not being like his brothers Zeus and Poseidon
But fairer question: Whose going to the job if not him? And also, both the movie and the tv series show that Hades is to blame for the standards of the underworld. Such as forcing the dead to float in the styx rather then go to an abode like in the myths. So really, if Hades's life is hell, its of his own making.
But it was zeus that sent he there to begin with even though hades should technically be the king of God's as he is the older brother and zeus is the youngest
Top ten Pixar characters we can identify them as mcu characters
1. Woody: captain America
2. Buzz lightyear: iron man
3. Bo peep: black widow
4. Sulley and mike: hulk, or groot and rocket
5.Jessie: Hawkeye
6. Lotso: thanos
7. The incredibles: the guardians of the galaxies or black widows family
8. Boo: baby groot or Cassie lang (the young version)
9. Hopper: thanos
10. Flit: Scott lang
So glad this got updated
* Sid is a psychopath!
* The hyenas were ruthless.
* Maleficent cursed a child.
^ Hades is a monster.
The hell is wrong with you?
And Syndrome's a toxic fan.
You need to rethink your definition of right. Just because there was a tragedy in their past, doesn't justify bad actions.
I have to disagree with shere khan the tiger being justified. The only reason he has it out for humans is because he wants to stay at top of the food chain in the jungle, he knows that humans are above tigers in the food chain, so he wants to get rid of the kid. It has nothing to do with him wanting the jungle and it’s animals to be safe from humans.
Hades Yzma and Hook are the most relatable to me
I had a feeling that this would be a topic. 🤣
You know, when looking at things from Sid Phillips' point of view, I can see him psychologically as either a surgeon or an engineer, like my Papa! Maybe if he would not be psychologically scarred by the alive toys, if the toys were not sentient, he would probably grow up with a pretty well-paying job. Maybe as he matures, he'd probably be a pretty good, decent-at-worst, co-worker with my Papa at Textron. And on the case of Maleficent... yeah, if I were the king, I would invite Maleficent over to Aurora's baby shower. Even as a villain, though, I think she's quite a charismatic character, with her majestic appearance, and Elanor Audley's voice, I would probably invite her, even with a little... tips for her, like try not to scare the baby, but make her dramatic appearance as she wishes. Maybe request some entertainment from her too.
Kind of hard to put Gabby Gabby in the villain category since Toy Story 4 kind of didn’t have a villain per say… as opposed to the others in 1-3
I'd say the cat in the antique store was more close to being a villain.
Sorry, but Sid from Toy Story WAS wrong. You seem to have missed that a lot of those toys he destroyed were NOT, in fact, his. They were his SISTER’S. So he was completely in the wrong.
I have to disagree on the subject Ursula. Even though she never made Ariel do anything she didn’t want to do, she sabotaged almost every aspect of the deal to work in her favor
You forgot Stinky Pete in Toy Story 2. He convinces Woody that is loving rightful owner Andy is growing up and will eventually out grow him. And we all know what ended up happening in toy Story 3 and 4.
U meant "Disney and Pixar" villans
Syndrome was just a kid who didn't truly know the reality of Superhero life.
But thinks that it means wearing costumes and beat bad guys up, showing no true desire to help others.
@@DavidBContentExtravaganza3967 the bad guys wouldn't show restraint simply because there's a kid in the room. Besides, even if Mr. Incredible was looking for/considering getting a sidekick, Buddy was too young despite his intelligence. I personally think that there's an unspoken rule about a minimum age limit when it comes to recruiting new heroes or sidekicks.
Woody and several other toys scared the crap out of the adolescent character Sid Phillps in the first ‘Toy Story’ movie.
Woody Totally Roasted Sid 💀
Also, your quip about maleficint "if you didn't want to invite her, you should have kept it as a small party" gives off victim blaming vibes. "Well if you didn't want your child to die in the shooting, you should have had them befriend the shooter!"
Same with the forest fires being man made. Not all fires are started by people, thunder strikes are a thing.
I have to give some support to Syndrome. I totally agree that he felt insulted ,and that told him that superheroes suck and need to be eliminated for a good cause, but when he decided to kill Bob's family by sending bullets to the plane, That totally crossed the line.
I literally never comment on a WatchMojo video. They usually have a pretty good grasp on reality with their lists. But there is a first time for everything.
There's no way you all can look at Sid and try to convince me that he was "just a kid" "not hurting anyone", etc. He bullied his little sister and other children, taking their stuff (stealing) and butchering them. He did not know the toys were alive, but he liked to believe they were while he tortured them, frequently talking about them as if they were going to respond while he burned, deconstructed and otherwise destroyed them. he didn't have the makings of a surgeon or anything of the sort. Those types of people usually find joy in "operating" on their toys and successfully recuperating them. He displayed textbook future psychopath behaviors.
Also props for being so blind as to call Sid "just a kid" for the crap he does while protecting child manipulators (Ursula) Attempted Child murderers (Shere Kahn) And Nepoticide (Hades). Like I get it. A lot of Disney villains are likeable for some reason or another, but to title this list as "Right all along" is BS
But when Lewis was returned to his own time, he fixed things for Goob so he caught the ball and went on to have a happy life.
In Greek Mythology, Hades felt like the only normal god there. If you look at what the other gods are doing, especially Zeus, Hades is Kida the gentleman here
You guys are completely WRONG about Hades. He wasn't BANISHED to the underworld, he was ASSIGNED the underworld. SOMEONE has to manage the dead, after all. Hades wanted to take over Olympus for S&Gs
For Sleeping Beauty, during that timeframe it was actually considered incredibly rude not to invite someone to events like a christening. It was a huge slight on Maleficent to not invite her, regardless of how they felt about her
I blame the writers for not allowing denahi to hear his brother's voice inside the bear's body. If that was possible, then denahi would have realized the truth sooner
How could he? Kenai's vocal chords changed as well. So he couldn't speak to any human in a comprehensible way.
Captain Gantu: Retire? But I’m too young to retired!
Grand Councilwoman: Captain Gantu, When I said I’m retiring you, I mean I’m fireing you!
Captain Gantu: You mean I’m fired? But Grand Councilwoman!
Grand Councilwoman: No buts!
The mayor’s secretary in Zootopia should be on this list. 😊
Really having your "Devil's Advocate" cake and eating it here, aren't you?
The answer is Scar. Yes, Mufasa turned out to be a great king and Scar was absolutely wrong for killing him, but what if Mufasa wasn't go great? He was only king because of birth order, and Simba only inherited the kingdom because he was the oldest son of the son. I feel like most of the world has already figured this out about monarchies, but...That's a really messed up way to do things. What if the leaders/future leaders are incompetent or corrupt? They get to be in charge just because of birth order and gender? What could go wrong? (I think the history books show us what could go wrong.) The only way to save the kingdom would be to do something like Scar did.
In the case of "The Lion King," Scar turned out to be the evil one, but what if he wasn't evil? What if Mufasa and/or Simba were evil? Then Scar's actions would have been justified. While he went about it in the wrong way, Scar wasn't wrong in his opinion that the birthright system is extremely flawed. Theoretically, how is it fair that he never had a chance to be king? Just because his brother fathered a son? The fate of the entire kingdom depended on what kind of child (if any) Mufasa had.
One that should have been on here is Finding Nemo. The dentist wasn't trying to kidnap Nemo he actually thought he was saving him and his niece Darla wasn't trying to kill the fish she thought they were sleeping. She loved fish!
Darla was a kid and didn't know shaking the bag would do that. Granted the dentist could've told her not to shake the bag but still.
Sid from Toy Story will never be redeemable in my eyes. He may be be creative, but the act of dismembering toys and reattaching them is the first sign of a sociopath. Next, he'll upgrade to animals and before you know it, we'll have another Jeffrey Dahmer on our hands