Nice video, I take this opportunity to remind you that the Italian branch still has only Dante Alighieri. It would be time to add the Cavour and Duilio class, including the modernized variants armed with 320mm guns.
Let's recall that France had a navy that rivaled Italy, yet don't have a navy of their own, while Germany who had a smaller navy than both France and Italy, has one.
the scharnhorst is not invincible. its hard to kill if your dumb and don't know were too shoot it. but if you know where to shoot it it can easily be 1 tapped one of its ammo rooms are lightly armor and a half salvo will pen and kill it in 1 shot
@@GWMsharpshot21 all the magazines on that ship are protectet equally (and very well i might add), almost every battleships can be one tapped if you are lucky and know were to shoot but scharnhorst is very tanky and saying otherwise is borderline insane
I had so much fun playing my American battleships during the last naval ec session, but this year we got a ton of new ships i can't wait for naval ec again! I hope one day it can be a full gamemode like heli ec!
man, only if naval got an ec a permeant ec.. Helicopters get EC, and soon PvE planes get EC tanks get sim Ships get, CBC with battleships with 30~ minute matches. 🤦♂
I might be wrong but I’m pretty sure gaijin is trying to steer away from the modern battleships for now. If you notice, all the ones in game are of ww1 vintage or interwar at the latest
@@lonelylad3023 I believe devs just add ships of a similar caliber and penetration. So battleships with 380-410mm guns (even if they are WWI era like Bayern) just be on higher ranks.
Increase the battle timer. "dont get close to enemy ships" don't worry, with a 30 minute battle timer you LITERALLY cant get near enemy ships or spawns if you try lol. No idea what crazy person decided to make 'realistic' naval battles have a shorter battle timer than air battles.
@@Robert53area yeah.. I don't mind smaller maps so much, I love some of the naval maps. But for me the naval timer is a massive joke. I think they should make it one hour and just double all point requirements to win. Just slow the gsme down generally. Make it so you actually can get to the enemy spawn to sink their convoys etc and so there's a point to moving in formation.
I tend to agree. arizona is a worthless battleship that is more then OP on paper but shitty in battle. Kongo and hyago is leaps better then american battleships.
With the longest reload time for the main guns, the Arizona has almost double the reload time of PK. it is also slow and has rubbish AA. The ship is not even in the top 5 of Battleships. Do you guys ever look at the in-game stats before you create your videos? I'm sorry but you got this one all wrong.
I totally agree with you. Although the arizona has a nasty HE shell with 40kg. I am yet to find one threatening to my Kongo or Scharnhorst. I will have uocked it soon myself so I'll be able to run it through its trials
Sales trick is all that is. Arizona is great, see we said so, buy eagles, buy the ship, quick. Kongo and scharnhorst should've been top 5 at least. Surprised that PK wasn't top, it being Russian and all lol
In Gaijin are idiots: after a year of waiting, they give us (finally) a naval enduring. Now, when the event is in progress... what a logic, event is not for enduring battles :(
Some people would say that the Schanhorst wasn't added to the list, because it's actually a Battlecruiser, Not a battleship, that's because Schanhorst has only 11 inch guns
Bismarck, Tirpitz, Bayern-class, P.E.Friedrich-class.🇩🇪 Yamato-class, Nagato, Ise-class, Fuso-class.🇯🇵 KGV-class, Queen Elizabeth, Warspite, Hood, Renown, Vanguard.🇬🇧 Iowa-class, South Dakota-class, North Carolina-class, Colorado-class, California-class.🇺🇲 Cavour, Roma, Vittorio Veneto.🇮🇹 Bretagne, Dunkerque, Richilieu, Jean Bart.🇨🇵 Been dreaming to have these beasts in the game
@@Stavrosstavrosstavros there are lots of ships to add to WT that were actually built, before adding paper ships. With their addition rate it will take years. Maybe for particular nations like Soviets that hadn't had real life ships similar to other WWII battleships.
@@spaceman112211 yea i guess to keep the game balanced and match the real ships some nations would require paper ships so that the tech tree could progress. Russians would need something heavier than cruisers to match north carolina and all that post dreadnought stuff
_..while tempting to build these Extra Large ..Heavy Battleships, they are vulnerable to fast, smaller warships they can't even aim at, much less hit or fire at.. these are great for escorting Transporters (when trading or ferrying)_
@@BucketandOnly Seen This guy on so many WT vids the same comment layout every time, I don’t think he’s a bot cuz he has vids, but I don’t think he’s particularly smart like the name says
USS Arizona? Are you guys joking? You have it an unhistorical reload rate of 60 seconds meanwhile in reality it was closer to 30, you made the turrets miserably slow, there is no SAP or high capacity HE, there is no AA defense, the armor is alright but that's really the only pro.
@@allena5545 The Bismarck is not a mega battleship. It's similar to other European battleships of the same period, like the Richelieu and Littorio classes. Actually, it's even inferior to them in most ways.
i just unlocked my first battleship the U.S.S Wyoming its alot of fun more than i thought it would be. id personally love to see the Alaska and West Virginia (after refit) and the Alaska would be perfect to go up against Scharnhorst i know Alaska isnt a battle ship and you didnt ask for opinions on other classes of ship but shes just so cool. oh and not that i play the french tech tree but they need a navy. how cool would it be sometime in the future of the game to have the Massachusetts vs the jean bart.
ok, arizona has 50 sec to reload with poor ap shell and parizhiskaya kommuna has less than 30 sec to reload with most powerful sap shell in game. and also this video says arizona is the most powerful battleship in the game. wow gaijin, are you guys serious?
You can really tell who in the comments has actually played naval and who hasn't. I've seen at least four faces I recognize here as good naval players - including two naval content creators - who think this list is fundamentally wrong. Everyone in the naval groups I'm in disagrees with it, including yet another WT ship reviewer. There's a lot of factors that go into this and the list does mention some hard facts as well. However, I think that saying that (release-state) Arizona with its a-historical reload and anemic bursting charges is top-tier is completely false. It also leaves out Scharnhorst, which for our purposes is a battleship, and easily in the top three. There are other iffy statements, but those are the two most noticeable ones.
Coming from "another" naval warfare game, so far, I am glad I left wowsl. Looking forward to playing Thunder, and aquiring true works of art in Thunder! Great game so far. Looks awesome!
WOW player here. I gave up on War Thunder, after grinding for God knows how many months, just to get a Corvette. I estimate ten years of playing no other game, to get one example each of a; cruiser, destroyer and Battleship. WT is broken.
Gaijin is really lagging behind in graphics. The quality and definition of wave effects, splashes, and explosions are sub-par. Ship movement looks outdated. WarGaming really has an advantage here. Gaijin effects need a total overhaul.
quick tutorial on battleships in WT: all Soviet battleships with SAP that with 1-2 salvoes (from 12 shots (!)) destroy anything even hitting the water near the belt, or hyuga-kongo which are even more op. end of the tutorial
Imagine sayin Arizona is #1, when she does not have her SAP. She has a horrendous reload and her shells deal a very small amount of damage (compared to other battleships). Only good thing about her is her armor, but that does not matter if you cannot remove ships from the match and end up with 10 ships all firing at you. (Exception being IJN Hyuga and the poltava/imperatritsa that get insta ammo racked…) Gaijin please fix this mess of a ship, she does not deserve it, and much less to be #1 here.
@@kentmacalalad Actually, we do have radar in naval. The most noticeable ones are Neustrashimy and top-tier coastal ships. Unfortunately, their only purpose right now is to search and track planes. (but I could be wrong though)
I think Ijn Hyuga should be at the top followed Kaiser at 2nd and 3rd Hms Marlborough. Japanese really had/ have the great battleships. Please add Legendary Yamato and Nagato in the game, it will be awesome.
Great stuff as always! Bruce - just a heads-up for future reference, the Hyuga's name is pronounced "hugh-gah" as Japanese vowels work a bit differently. Hope this helps.
>refuses to call Scharnhorst a Battleship as stated on her blueprints >refuses to put her into the list because you conveniently didnt call her BB >successfully avoided talking about how broken her DM and armour model is task failed successfully
Yea but its not first time It happened in WT remember that famous American light tank we called the M18 tank destroyer i will wait for everyone to remember
@@HMSVanguard46 The British called anything over 25knots a Battlecruiser. By that definition, Bismark, Iowa and Yamato are all Battlecruisers. Besides Scharnhorst is German, doesnt matter what the British called her, she is a fast Battleship
@@Libarate17 by your own train of thought, the HMS Vanguard, HMS King George and sisters were battlecruisers? That was the world war one standard, by ww2 is was designated by armour and speed and firepower in a combined equation, for example If a ship has a fast speed, and thick armour, but 11 inch guns, it would be a battle cruiser, it it had fast speed, thin armour and big guns, it would be a battlecruiser. A fast battleship has all three.
@@HMSVanguard46 they were battleships, were classified as such. They were going to be fitted with their original 15" guns but sharnhorst ended up being sunk and her sister being used a blockade. It doesn't matter what the British thought.
Q: Hey gaijin: my brain work again and i was thinking ! SO! : you add modern stuff and all but...what about..DYNAMIC Battle ? Can we have Modern Dynamic campaign PWEAAAZ
Please add animation and mecanic for shooting war ship like in real life . War ship dont shot all there gun in the same time but one turret shot one gun at the time whit a slight delay before next gun shot
Welp its gonna be updated later on when they add Fuso and North Carolina class of battleships haha or even the addition of 1 Queen Elizabeth class battleship would render this ships obsolete
In my opinion the Scharnhorst is better than the Bayern, it has very good firepower and is very good agil. Scharnhorst is like the "Leaopard 1" and the SMS Bayern is the "Maus"
I'd argue she's better than Hyuga due to how low she sits in the water and how fast she is, while also having superior gun angles for maximum firepower.
@@BleedingUranium To be fair, this video also claims a battleship with a 50s aced reload and a 65 base reload, no SAP, mediocre HE, and no mobility is the best battleship in the game, so their list can be taken with a massive grain of salt. Kongo's also future-proofed as in her 1944 fit, she has fire control radar whenever they model that )))
Well the Pennsylvania class super-dreadnought battleships were on part with the Queen Elizabeth ones, ....PLEASE THE HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH & WARPSITE!!!!!
@@PaladinGhost1337 sure has a harder time dying than the other battleships. I agree not the heaviest. But it is hard if not harder to sink when using 12 inch guns.
How or where can I recommend for future updates, the addition of more units or certain improvements? It would be good if, as in land and air vehicles, there are even the most modern ones that are the same at sea or that one more tab be added in nations so that the player can arm his forces with the units of different nations without the need to use a nation every time he wants to use a specific unit. that would be great!!!!!!Cheers
I still don't really understand the point in having a stern bow gun setup and weak belt armour. To get full salvo you have to expose the belt it's that simple 😂
We need German battleship! KMS Bismarck! And of course we need a legendary battlecruiser is HMS Hood! Come on Warthunder! There battle will be legendary!!
Don’t, the ship is awful just like the rest of the American battleships, that’s why I quit grinding that tree and I’m now grinding the Japanese tree for Kongo
The Arizona is probably the worst battleship on this list, certainly not the best. It had an insanely long reload and the AP rounds don’t really do much damage. Even the survivability isn’t too great since it loses crew rather quickly. On paper it seems good, but those things really let it down in game.
Nice video, I take this opportunity to remind you that the Italian branch still has only Dante Alighieri. It would be time to add the Cavour and Duilio class, including the modernized variants armed with 320mm guns.
Oh yes. Italy had the 4th biggest navy in the world. I don't understand why they don't add more battleships to the tech tree.
@@normaluser5755 yeah I've been questioning
Let's recall that France had a navy that rivaled Italy, yet don't have a navy of their own, while Germany who had a smaller navy than both France and Italy, has one.
@@lavrentivs9891 It will be funny when weahrboos will find out that the Richelieu and Littorio classes have thicker armour than the Bismarck.
@@normaluser5755 In my humble opinion they will add these really big boys when coastal gets ASM like exocet on the bussard and the soviet Tarantul.
When is France going to get naval? I’d love to play their battleships
But probably gonna be expensive
Idk if war thunder would want to add baguettes
I’m joking but idk when the French r gonna get baggiest- ships
mmmm the Dourtmound
8 guns on the front
It feels like never at this point…
You just want drift Jean Bart
If the Arizonas reload got buffed, only then would I agree with its #1 placement. Even then, wheres the Scharnhorst? Its invincible
Scharnhorst is a battlecruiser, not a battleship
the scharnhorst is not invincible. its hard to kill if your dumb and don't know were too shoot it. but if you know where to shoot it it can easily be 1 tapped one of its ammo rooms are lightly armor and a half salvo will pen and kill it in 1 shot
@@xXRaulitox01Xx the game classifies it as a battle cruiser but it was very much a battleship irl
@@GWMsharpshot21 all the magazines on that ship are protectet equally (and very well i might add), almost every battleships can be one tapped if you are lucky and know were to shoot but scharnhorst is very tanky and saying otherwise is borderline insane
So where do you shoot at the scharnhorst because at 3k I couldn’t pen the sides and it wasn’t angling
I had so much fun playing my American battleships during the last naval ec session, but this year we got a ton of new ships i can't wait for naval ec again! I hope one day it can be a full gamemode like heli ec!
man, only if naval got an ec a permeant ec..
Helicopters get EC, and soon PvE
planes get EC
tanks get sim
Ships get, CBC with battleships with 30~ minute matches.
🤦♂
We wanted a French Naval. I know it's going to be expensive but it might be worth it.
They said that they will add it after the Italian naval :p
The Italian navy was added two years ago so that's fun for the four people that want the Swedish navy
I hope at some point we'll get HMS Vanguard, USS Iowa, Musashi, KMS Bismarck and maybe Vittorio Veneto or Roma in the game.
Vittorio veneto, please.
@@serjacklucern4584 oops sorry
I might be wrong but I’m pretty sure gaijin is trying to steer away from the modern battleships for now. If you notice, all the ones in game are of ww1 vintage or interwar at the latest
@@lonelylad3023 I believe devs just add ships of a similar caliber and penetration. So battleships with 380-410mm guns (even if they are WWI era like Bayern) just be on higher ranks.
@@spaceman112211 yeah building up
Increase the battle timer. "dont get close to enemy ships" don't worry, with a 30 minute battle timer you LITERALLY cant get near enemy ships or spawns if you try lol.
No idea what crazy person decided to make 'realistic' naval battles have a shorter battle timer than air battles.
They also have smaller maps than most land battles. So some of the open sea maps you start at almost point blank range for BBs
@@Robert53area yeah.. I don't mind smaller maps so much, I love some of the naval maps. But for me the naval timer is a massive joke. I think they should make it one hour and just double all point requirements to win. Just slow the gsme down generally. Make it so you actually can get to the enemy spawn to sink their convoys etc and so there's a point to moving in formation.
I tend to disagree with the #1. IMO kongo is superior to arizona. I had yet to have an arizona do more than barrel damage.
I tend to agree. arizona is a worthless battleship that is more then OP on paper but shitty in battle.
Kongo and hyago is leaps better then american battleships.
Arizona is more for soaking fire then deleting stuff.
With the longest reload time for the main guns, the Arizona has almost double the reload time of PK. it is also slow and has rubbish AA. The ship is not even in the top 5 of Battleships. Do you guys ever look at the in-game stats before you create your videos? I'm sorry but you got this one all wrong.
I totally agree with you. Although the arizona has a nasty HE shell with 40kg. I am yet to find one threatening to my Kongo or Scharnhorst. I will have uocked it soon myself so I'll be able to run it through its trials
I clearly agree i can't imagine they play just one game in top tier. By placing the kommuna 3rd place and this poor Arizona 1rst.
Sales trick is all that is. Arizona is great, see we said so, buy eagles, buy the ship, quick. Kongo and scharnhorst should've been top 5 at least. Surprised that PK wasn't top, it being Russian and all lol
In Gaijin are idiots: after a year of waiting, they give us (finally) a naval enduring. Now, when the event is in progress... what a logic, event is not for enduring battles :(
Some people would say that the Schanhorst wasn't added to the list, because it's actually a Battlecruiser, Not a battleship, that's because Schanhorst has only 11 inch guns
Bismarck, Tirpitz, Bayern-class, P.E.Friedrich-class.🇩🇪
Yamato-class, Nagato, Ise-class, Fuso-class.🇯🇵
KGV-class, Queen Elizabeth, Warspite, Hood, Renown, Vanguard.🇬🇧
Iowa-class, South Dakota-class, North Carolina-class, Colorado-class, California-class.🇺🇲
Cavour, Roma, Vittorio Veneto.🇮🇹
Bretagne, Dunkerque, Richilieu, Jean Bart.🇨🇵
Been dreaming to have these beasts in the game
Yeah have fun playing cruiser and got 1 shot by that
I think they should also add the blueprint ships that Wows has, theyve done it with tanks and planes already
@@Stavrosstavrosstavros there are lots of ships to add to WT that were actually built, before adding paper ships. With their addition rate it will take years. Maybe for particular nations like Soviets that hadn't had real life ships similar to other WWII battleships.
@@spaceman112211 yea i guess to keep the game balanced and match the real ships some nations would require paper ships so that the tech tree could progress. Russians would need something heavier than cruisers to match north carolina and all that post dreadnought stuff
_..while tempting to build these Extra Large ..Heavy Battleships, they are vulnerable to fast, smaller warships they can't even aim at, much less hit or fire at.. these are great for escorting Transporters (when trading or ferrying)_
Can we all take a moment to appreciate the work war Thunder's official channel is doing to make us entertain? Man thank you very much!
Entertain?
You choked me there
Smells like Bot account here. ,,cAn We tAkE a mOmEnt...."
@@BucketandOnly Seen This guy on so many WT vids the same comment layout every time, I don’t think he’s a bot cuz he has vids, but I don’t think he’s particularly smart like the name says
What? The game is a sht. What r u talking about?
I lay out this comment to find you guys
The french marine would be perfect !!
USS Arizona? Are you guys joking? You have it an unhistorical reload rate of 60 seconds meanwhile in reality it was closer to 30, you made the turrets miserably slow, there is no SAP or high capacity HE, there is no AA defense, the armor is alright but that's really the only pro.
Bismark and Tirpitz is what I’m waiting for…
I want the good ol' USS "Temper Temper" Wisconsin
one of them if aded to the game is probably a premium ship and i hate it
Q: when will you add the french navy?
Im ready for sweedish navy too...if there are any good
@IS-2 Heavy Tank those mega battleships would be hard to balance, it would be a lot like the maus.
@IS-2 Heavy Tank there is still alot of battleships and battlecruisers to go before those two are added
@IS-2 Heavy Tank No. Why are you non-naval players all hyped up about the Big famous battleships when they won’t bring anything new to naval?
@@allena5545 The Bismarck is not a mega battleship. It's similar to other European battleships of the same period, like the Richelieu and Littorio classes. Actually, it's even inferior to them in most ways.
i just unlocked my first battleship the U.S.S Wyoming its alot of fun more than i thought it would be. id personally love to see the Alaska and West Virginia (after refit) and the Alaska would be perfect to go up against Scharnhorst i know Alaska isnt a battle ship and you didnt ask for opinions on other classes of ship but shes just so cool. oh and not that i play the french tech tree but they need a navy. how cool would it be sometime in the future of the game to have the Massachusetts vs the jean bart.
When is the France naval tech tree going to be released?
Yes yes. That's fine and all. But when will you introduce the Caio Duilio battleship (1913) with the 305mm triple and twin turrets
The French Navy has always been one of the most powerful since the age of sail, where is it, Gaijin?
The British sunk it
@@christopherclaborn1730 not all, and to the end of the War some French ships didnt stop the fight against Germany. Stop being disrespectful.
@@hyrikul602 humor is like food in Stalin's USSR, not everyone gets it.
@@christopherclaborn1730 lol
i hope they add the IJN Yamato
Best BB in the Gaijin's world is bugged SKR-7!
Got mine aced crew, love it
How is SKR bugged? Seems to slay everyone just fine for me 🤣
KMS Scharnhorst: Am I too OP to you?
Add french naval and a French IFV please
For me the huyga and the kongo are the hest bb's
Remember when they told us that catapult planes wouldn't be able to capture zones?
Without repair fee reduction, battleship is a joke in this game
Life of a battleship in the game is.. Spawn, sail, see the enemy then get bombed by CAS
@@asterixai7161 then pay 70k repair fee
@@pacifickempeitai they gotta decrease it somehow tho or its always unprofitable income no matter how many you killed
ok, arizona has 50 sec to reload with poor ap shell and parizhiskaya kommuna has less than 30 sec to reload with most powerful sap shell in game. and also this video says arizona is the most powerful battleship in the game. wow gaijin, are you guys serious?
for me Arizona is one of the worst 6.7 BB in the game
I haven't watched yet, but i know it's going to be good because it's YOU!! 💕
Why are you here?
@@koki956 paid for the account
@@drytishuuz what?
@@koki956 they paid for that account.
their comment is just to make people go to their page? I honestly don’t know the purpose of those accounts
@@drytishuuz ohhhh so they r spamming these comments in RUclips
For any people wondering, the intro song was 'Winter of My Mind' (from Darlene Hallwell Vance)
Big fan of British vessels, happy to see the HMS Marlborough. Would love to see the King George V or Queen Elizabeth class dreadnoughts added too
hell yeah Bri'ish Gang 💪
also known as floating cancer
2:10 “An allied Dreadnought is en route”
BF1 days
You can really tell who in the comments has actually played naval and who hasn't. I've seen at least four faces I recognize here as good naval players - including two naval content creators - who think this list is fundamentally wrong. Everyone in the naval groups I'm in disagrees with it, including yet another WT ship reviewer. There's a lot of factors that go into this and the list does mention some hard facts as well. However, I think that saying that (release-state) Arizona with its a-historical reload and anemic bursting charges is top-tier is completely false. It also leaves out Scharnhorst, which for our purposes is a battleship, and easily in the top three. There are other iffy statements, but those are the two most noticeable ones.
Coming from "another" naval warfare game, so far, I am glad I left wowsl. Looking forward to playing Thunder, and aquiring true works of art in Thunder! Great game so far. Looks awesome!
I wish you best luck and nerves of steel when you reach 5.0 BR in WT naval and will be facing multiple battleships in a cruiser over and over again.
Don't worry pretty sure they still haven't fixed the currency in war thunder, it's more broken the WOW
WOW player here. I gave up on War Thunder, after grinding for God knows how many months, just to get a Corvette. I estimate ten years of playing no other game, to get one example each of a; cruiser, destroyer and Battleship. WT is broken.
I personally love the scout planes added to war thunder!
Gaijin is really lagging behind in graphics. The quality and definition of wave effects, splashes, and explosions are sub-par. Ship movement looks outdated. WarGaming really has an advantage here. Gaijin effects need a total overhaul.
probably youtubers will make a content out of the "uss arizona'' by making the historical explosion .
Iowa Class Battleships are what's needed!
WoWs: "Hey, what you doin there Gaijin?"
WT: "Oh, nothing really" **nervous laugh**
quick tutorial on battleships in WT: all Soviet battleships with SAP that with 1-2 salvoes (from 12 shots (!)) destroy anything even hitting the water near the belt, or hyuga-kongo which are even more op. end of the tutorial
5:18 definitely not the turret of a FV4005
Imagine sayin Arizona is #1, when she does not have her SAP. She has a horrendous reload and her shells deal a very small amount of damage (compared to other battleships). Only good thing about her is her armor, but that does not matter if you cannot remove ships from the match and end up with 10 ships all firing at you.
(Exception being IJN Hyuga and the poltava/imperatritsa that get insta ammo racked…)
Gaijin please fix this mess of a ship, she does not deserve it, and much less to be #1 here.
Very nice... now bring the chat back
Great. Can we talk about the missing navy’s now?
It needs radar which is going to be similar to WoWs mechanics somehow
@@kentmacalalad Actually, we do have radar in naval. The most noticeable ones are Neustrashimy and top-tier coastal ships. Unfortunately, their only purpose right now is to search and track planes. (but I could be wrong though)
Bismarck when ?
Further away than even 4th gen jets I assure you.
@@kkang2828 :(
I think Ijn Hyuga should be at the top followed Kaiser at 2nd and 3rd Hms Marlborough. Japanese really had/ have the great battleships. Please add Legendary Yamato and Nagato in the game, it will be awesome.
Maybe the best battleships are the friends we made along the way?
not to much of a navy guy, but I do enjoy it sometimes, but something I do enjoy always, is your videos, keep up, war thunder and bruce!
battleships is so fun, only sad it takes long to actually research 1
Let alone researching one. You'll waste almost a year trying to get a single uptier heavy cruiser. Dont forget the ABYSMAL repair cost
I just want to point that Italy still only has one battleship, in case you forgot Gaijin...
Great stuff as always! Bruce - just a heads-up for future reference, the Hyuga's name is pronounced "hugh-gah" as Japanese vowels work a bit differently. Hope this helps.
>refuses to call Scharnhorst a Battleship as stated on her blueprints
>refuses to put her into the list because you conveniently didnt call her BB
>successfully avoided talking about how broken her DM and armour model is
task failed successfully
Depends on the definition my friend.
British definition makes her a battle cruiser, with 11 inch guns, fast speed and decent armour.
Yea but its not first time It happened in WT remember that famous American light tank we called the M18 tank destroyer i will wait for everyone to remember
@@HMSVanguard46 The British called anything over 25knots a Battlecruiser. By that definition, Bismark, Iowa and Yamato are all Battlecruisers. Besides Scharnhorst is German, doesnt matter what the British called her, she is a fast Battleship
@@Libarate17 by your own train of thought, the HMS Vanguard, HMS King George and sisters were battlecruisers? That was the world war one standard, by ww2 is was designated by armour and speed and firepower in a combined equation, for example
If a ship has a fast speed, and thick armour, but 11 inch guns, it would be a battle cruiser, it it had fast speed, thin armour and big guns, it would be a battlecruiser. A fast battleship has all three.
@@HMSVanguard46 they were battleships, were classified as such. They were going to be fitted with their original 15" guns but sharnhorst ended up being sunk and her sister being used a blockade. It doesn't matter what the British thought.
T-35 land battleship is the best confirmed by the snail itself
When naval EC and French navy and more Italian battleships Gaijin?
Q: Hey gaijin: my brain work again and i was thinking !
SO! : you add modern stuff and all but...what about..DYNAMIC Battle ? Can we have Modern Dynamic campaign PWEAAAZ
Please add animation and mecanic for shooting war ship like in real life . War ship dont shot all there gun in the same time but one turret shot one gun at the time whit a slight delay before next gun shot
The best BBs are yet to come.
Not sure how well it’d go but what about adding some submarines.
Warthunder needs to bring in bismarck and Iowa classes
Welp its gonna be updated later on when they add Fuso and North Carolina class of battleships haha or even the addition of 1 Queen Elizabeth class battleship would render this ships obsolete
In my opinion the Scharnhorst is better than the Bayern, it has very good firepower and is very good agil. Scharnhorst is like the "Leaopard 1" and the SMS Bayern is the "Maus"
It is a shame that Kongo's burning love from Japan didn't reach the list (sad)😫
@@PiethagorasTearem wave motion gun ready
I'd argue she's better than Hyuga due to how low she sits in the water and how fast she is, while also having superior gun angles for maximum firepower.
Kongou deserves better. :(
@@BleedingUranium To be fair, this video also claims a battleship with a 50s aced reload and a 65 base reload, no SAP, mediocre HE, and no mobility is the best battleship in the game, so their list can be taken with a massive grain of salt. Kongo's also future-proofed as in her 1944 fit, she has fire control radar whenever they model that )))
kongo is a battlecruiser though
When is the French Navy coming
Well the Pennsylvania class super-dreadnought battleships were on part with the Queen Elizabeth ones, ....PLEASE THE HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH & WARPSITE!!!!!
I’m currently waiting for Gajen to add Iowa or New Jersey
nice video, awesome voice, but where are the long range maps?in all your maps you start between 10-15 km and its not long range
man i would love to get my hands on some of the british and us battleship/battlecruisers but i still need to research some cruisers
Give us the New Jersey and Satsuma
Bismarck would be nice
im surprised scharnhorst wasnt on the list. thing is a menace to weaker battleships with its survivability and AA protection.
scharnhorst is not a battleship it is a havy battle cruser
even if it is marked as battleship in war thunder
@@PaladinGhost1337 sure has a harder time dying than the other battleships. I agree not the heaviest. But it is hard if not harder to sink when using 12 inch guns.
I hope we eventually get the South Dakota class of Battleships for the Americans. I've actually visited the USS Massachusetts which is of that class.
Any vids of the naval classes explained? I’m sure there is a ton vids, I just can’t find them
Personally, I would just LOOOOOOVVEE if they brought in the USS Iowa with those 17 inch guns
Hyuga is the best change my mind. It eats arisonas for breakfast.
and my north Dakota eats the hyuga for lunch lol. its such a easy ship too knock out lol😂
Hyuga is easy to destroy.
and my scharnhorst eat hyugas for breakfast😅
It'd be nice if Italy could get some of those.
I wonder when they will add the Moscow cruiser.
How or where can I recommend for future updates, the addition of more units or certain improvements? It would be good if, as in land and air vehicles, there are even the most modern ones that are the same at sea or that one more tab be added in nations so that the player can arm his forces with the units of different nations without the need to use a nation every time he wants to use a specific unit.
that would be great!!!!!!Cheers
I still don't really understand the point in having a stern bow gun setup and weak belt armour. To get full salvo you have to expose the belt it's that simple 😂
Wait a few months or years until this video is re-discussed, but with some cooler ships ;)
Patiently waiting for HMS Warspite
Idk why the Scharnhorst isnt here. I have no problem killing any of these ships with it.
they think its a battlecruiser
0:40 that flag was like when a wet dog shakes itself dry
Battleships are always the best xD
my favorite is the battleship espana, bring it in the game war thunder
Arizona number 1, we can observe that not even Gaijin plays Naval
We need German battleship! KMS Bismarck! And of course we need a legendary battlecruiser is HMS Hood! Come on Warthunder! There battle will be legendary!!
Their battle will be pretty much like a real one with Bismarck having 500-600 mm of penetration and the Hood's armor belt is 150-300mm.
French navy when?
Can't wait to take my Arizona to Naval RB EC tomorrow!
Don’t, the ship is awful just like the rest of the American battleships, that’s why I quit grinding that tree and I’m now grinding the Japanese tree for Kongo
Hi I'm confused about the crew of the tbf-1c cause there is a extra gunner that I saw on the x ray
I like Battleship Texas!
I Hope the Iowa Class comes. Especially the New Jersey
What's the most SL one could lose in a single Ground RB Match?
My favorite battleship is the SKR-7!
The Arizona is probably the worst battleship on this list, certainly not the best. It had an insanely long reload and the AP rounds don’t really do much damage. Even the survivability isn’t too great since it loses crew rather quickly. On paper it seems good, but those things really let it down in game.
yea the AP rounds on the Arizona don't do much, I get the most luck with the HE and just try to flood people
I think you shpuld Put IJN Kongo, with her massively strong AA gun enemy plane Will be impossible to Dodge that AA gun
Update the navy tech trees we want iowas and maybe subs give the navy some love. Maybe aircraft carriers
Awesome video! Can't wait to get my hands on these ship, I wonder if the Yamato gets an appearance in the future.
I imagine this video will have to be revisited later on when we have the Yamato and Missouri in the game.