What have the sedevacantists got right? Why we should listen to them.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 июл 2024
- The pope does not have authority, and neither does anybody else, to change the liturgy as was done in 1955. This over-reach of authority, this infidelity to God, this contempt for Tradition, has multiplied and multiplied in its consequences. This includes the invention in 1968 of a new rite of consecration of bishops which arguably invalid, certainly deficient and evidently, for all to see, a disaster for the whole Church.
Sedevacantists such as Fr Anthony Cekada, RIP, argued that we have had no pope since Pius XII and that the consecration of bishops according to the 1968 rite are invalid. Even if Catholics do not agree with his conclusions, it is important to listen to his reasoning. He is absolutely right to point to the 1955 changes to Holy Week as the trigger of the growing crisis we see in the Church today.
🕒 Time stamps 🕞
0:00 Intro
1:40 Pope not greater than Tradition
4:40 Undermining trust in the Bible
6:33 New rite for bishops (1968)
13:30 Solutions
14:35 Strength from St Agapitus
📚 Details of Fr Mawdsley's NEW OLD book series may be found here:
amazon.com/author/fr.james.mawdsley
🔴 Adam's Deep Sleep: The Passion of Jesus Christ Prefigured in the Old Testament (1 July 2022) bit.ly/Adams-Sleep
🔴 Crushing satan's head: The Victory of the Virgin Mary Foretold in the Old Testmanet (8 Dec 2022 - ebooks available for pre-order now) bit.ly/Crushing-satan
🔴 Crucifixion to Creation: Roots of the Traditional Liturgy Traced back to Paradise (25 March 2023 - ebooks available for pre-order now) bit.ly/Crucifixion-to-Creation
Please pray for me, for the conversion of myself into the Catholic Church, and God willing, that my husband and children become believers and follow suit soon after. 🙏🏻
May Lord Jesus’ Will be done, praying for you Sister Salina.
Stear clear of Catholicism, for within it you'll never find salvation, only obedience to their rituals and man made tradition. You're much better off finding yourself a Baptist church. Good luck.
Don’t do it it’s a house of cards and a lie. You need to wake up.
God rest
🙏❤ May the Holy Spirit descended upon you and remain with you in discovering and discerning the one holy, Catholic (universal) and apostolic church that God created here in earth though His Son for us gain eternal life and union with Him - our creator - in heaven.
@@save2a4all You must have copied & pasted that response of yours off of some Papist cult site. I mean, I really hope you haven't allowed yourself to become that mind controlled by that Satanic Papist cult. Good luck.
I attended my first TLM on the feast of the Assumption this year. It was so beautiful. I'm in mid Wales, so it's a bit of a trek, but I'm determined to attend as much as possible. Thank you Fr Mawdsley.
Deo gratias! Tradition cannot be stopped, because people will search for it and will make any sacrifice for it, because it transmits to us the best thing on earth: Jesus Christ.
Where? I'm in Defed
@@ScriptureandTraditionFrJM Father, my faith has been tittering lately but I still remain. I wonder where at some point we are going to be able to attend the TLM in the near future? I live in Alabama , just recently moved here from blue state. I wish that I could chat with you.
Yes !
I was lead to the TLM recently .
It is PRECIOUS to me.
Nothing else on earth as beautiful .
@@crowlikemadness there is sedevacantist valid and licit Mass in southern Alabama, and a big CMRI parish in far north Alabama. Clergy who do not compromise.
Pray for the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. 🙏🙏📿📿
Dear Fr., my dad was an ordained Catholic Deacon-used to say that a long homily took 15 minutes to prepare but a 15 minute homily took 5 hours to prepare. It is obvious to me that the time you put into these ‘short’ talks takes hours of research, etc. to prepare. Thank you! I pray 3 Hail Marys for you each time I watch one.
"If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter."
I once read that Abp. Fulton Sheen spent four hours preparing for a ten minute homily.
10 years ago I thought that sedevacantists were mad......I don't any more.
I agree
This Bible passage shows how Francis is anathema which means he is not Catholic.
Galatians 1:8-9 "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema. As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be anathema.”
Francis professes the following:
All men are saved, the Quoron is a holy book, Martin Luther had good intentions on justification, there are non-Catholic saints, homosexual "marriage" is acceptable, it is a grave sin to convince people of the Catholic faith.
I have playlists on my channel that support sedevacantism.
Me too. I became one last year
I am sedevacantist in Austin Tx. Everyone I know thinks I am crazy. But... 1967 my First Grade Nun, who grows in stature every year, gave me a statue of Mother of God and Child Jesus.
After that, the lights went out. I learned about Catholic faith from Man for All Seasons and Becket. And Dad, Grandma who fell away in a few years.
I pray for that Dear Nun EVERY DAY.
Mother of Sorrows, Valiant Woman, Mother of MERCY, pray for us
Never given a Catechism. Taught bizarre things, many if which as a child, teenager I knew to be bizarre.
Ven Catherine Emmerich said when the end goes down there will be barely 100 priests who are still Catholic. This could explain that prophecy
Where can I find this prophecy
@@ChrisEAdlay I first heard it on tradcatknight, then several other places. You should be able to search it. I would think goo gle would have scrubbed it. Like Hidegard of Bingen's prophecy of the mass of Babylon. The mass of many tongues that Christ said was not of Him. The one so disrespectful that they had women in pants by the altar.
@@livingpurgatory3 so where am supposed to go for the sacraments? There's an Assyrian church of the East that accepts Catholics here. I don't know what to do
@@ChrisEAdlay Padre Pio said the time would come when you were reduced only to your rosaries.
He said a fake church would take over the real church. Look at the last prophecy of St Francis for a wake up call. I believe Quo Vadis did a vid where the read the prophecy.
It will be spiritual communion and rosaries
I don't think that Anna Katharina Emmerich said that.
All praise and thanks be to God for His lowly, loyal servant, Fr. Mawdsley.
🙏🏻 God’ Bless you Father, Amen:
From Dublin Ireland 🇮🇪🇻🇦
R. I. P., Fr. Cekada 🙏
Thanks this good father for a tribute to the late father Csekada. He was a great mind and true visionary. I recommend wholeheartedly his book ‘Work of human hands’, which deals how Novus Ordo Missae was established, and how and why is it different from the traditional Mass of the Ages. God bless and Ave!
Excellent book.
Thank you, Fr. Mawdsley. God bless you.
God bless Father Cekada. May he Rest In Peace. Long live CMRI.
Fr. Cekada was not with the CMRI. He was ordained in the SSPX, expelled and helped form the SSPV but later broke off and sided with Bishop Dolan against Bishop Kelly.
May God have mercy on his soul.
@@kansasguthries7259 I wonder why such divisions happened….I pray that all this chaos ends soon
@@binyamin3716 pride....modernist priests are prideful but sadly so are many Traditional priests...Satan knows how to tempt priests
Agreed!! Father Cekada is amazing!!!
The legitimate bishops (=named by a pope) constitute the hierarchy of the Church. To cut oneself off from them, as the sedevacantists do, has already been condemned by Leo XII and Leo XIII.
These popes were targeting a group whose members denied the legitimacy of Pope Pius VII: like the sedevacantists.
Leo XII, Pastoris Aeterni: “Your Little Church cannot therefore in any way belong to the Catholic Church. By the very admission of your masters, or rather of those who deceive you, there are no longer any French bishops who support and defend the party you follow. Moreover, all the bishops of the Catholic Universe, to whom they themselves have appealed, and to whom they have addressed their schismatic claims in print, are recognized as approving the conventions of Pius VII and the acts which followed, and the whole Catholic Church is now entirely favorable to them.”
Leo XIII, Eximia nos laetitia: “Absolutely no bishop considers them and governs them as his sheep. From this they must conclude with certainty and evidence that they are defectors from the fold of Christ.
Now, just as the Little Church had no bishop who recognized them, so the sedevacantists had no legitimate bishop who recognized them, all of whom recognized the Council in 1964 and 1965 (they were consecrated under Pius XII).
I have such DEEP RESPECT FOR YOU FOR SAYING GOOD THINGS ABOUT FATHER CEKADA.
A dear priest, A kind man, who helped me.
Bishop Daniel Dolan conditionally confirmed me . traveled to Dallas from Ohio.
My deepest gratitude
Thank you Fr. JM for explaining the importance of Traditional mass. Praying that many will come back to TM. God bless and protect you always.
Thank you Father for these helpful teachings.
Thank you, Father Mawdsley, for your teaching in these matters. It is always a blessing to learn from your scholarship.
Thank you so much for discussing Sedevacantists. Much appreciated. Of note as well for the Sedes-many of their priests and religious these days were the children of wise parents that fled with their families to protect them from the disastrous falsehoods of Vatican II. These parents had much foresight and fortitude, so these priests and religious were never malformed by the modernists. Pax et Bonum.
The legitimate bishops (=named by a pope) constitute the hierarchy of the Church. To cut oneself off from them, as the sedevacantists do, has already been condemned by Leo XII and Leo XIII.
These popes were targeting a group whose members denied the legitimacy of Pope Pius VII: like the sedevacantists.
Leo XII, Pastoris Aeterni: “Your Little Church cannot therefore in any way belong to the Catholic Church. By the very admission of your masters, or rather of those who deceive you, there are no longer any French bishops who support and defend the party you follow. Moreover, all the bishops of the Catholic Universe, to whom they themselves have appealed, and to whom they have addressed their schismatic claims in print, are recognized as approving the conventions of Pius VII and the acts which followed, and the whole Catholic Church is now entirely favorable to them.”
Leo XIII, Eximia nos laetitia: “Absolutely no bishop considers them and governs them as his sheep. From this they must conclude with certainty and evidence that they are defectors from the fold of Christ.
Now, just as the Little Church had no bishop who recognized them, so the sedevacantists had no legitimate bishop who recognized them, all of whom recognized the Council in 1964 and 1965 (they were consecrated under Pius XII).
@@fidefidelis4912 Do Bps. Mendez and Thuc not count?
@@luked7956 They weren't sede in 1965, they even signed V2, Bp. Mendez even signed a document in 1966 where he accepts Paul VI and V2.
@@fidefidelis4912 Yes, that's true. Is there a group of sedevacantists you can identify from 1965 which didn't have support from a bishop at the time?
@@luked7956 They existed, but not as an united group, plus they rejected only Paul VI post-1964/5, not John XXIII. And they weren't recognized by any bishop, which proves that their position is schismatic and that Paul VI was a true pope. Also, the fact that all bishops recognized John XXIII's and Paul VI's acts in 1960s prove they were true popes.
Thank you Fr. Excellent. From Ireland 🇮🇪
Good man Rob.... you never told me about this priest
TRADITION is a MUST
GOD BLESS THE SSPV , WHICH I AM A MEMBER
The legitimate bishops (=named by a pope) constitute the hierarchy of the Church. To cut oneself off from them, as the sedevacantists do, has already been condemned by Leo XII and Leo XIII.
These popes were targeting a group whose members denied the legitimacy of Pope Pius VII: like the sedevacantists.
Leo XII, Pastoris Aeterni: “Your Little Church cannot therefore in any way belong to the Catholic Church. By the very admission of your masters, or rather of those who deceive you, there are no longer any French bishops who support and defend the party you follow. Moreover, all the bishops of the Catholic Universe, to whom they themselves have appealed, and to whom they have addressed their schismatic claims in print, are recognized as approving the conventions of Pius VII and the acts which followed, and the whole Catholic Church is now entirely favorable to them.”
Leo XIII, Eximia nos laetitia: “Absolutely no bishop considers them and governs them as his sheep. From this they must conclude with certainty and evidence that they are defectors from the fold of Christ.
Now, just as the Little Church had no bishop who recognized them, so the sedevacantists had no legitimate bishop who recognized them, all of whom recognized the Council in 1964 and 1965 (they were consecrated under Pius XII).
@Pat Last Even if Vatican II church is false church and Vatican II popes are false popes, it doesn't imply that sedevacantists are true Church.
Fr. Mawdsley:
Thanks so much for these videos!!
It does so much to bring closer together, ALL Catholics committed to Sacred Tradition and the Classical Roman Rite. Perhaps we can’t come together on every jot and tittle, but this does so much. Ad Multos Annos!!!
I hope many FSSP priests listen to you. Some think Sunday precept Is fulfilled in Novus Ordo mass but not in Sedevacantist TLM. I attend any TLM available, and stay away from Novus Ordo.
Sedevacantists have no ordinary jurisdiction nor canonical apostolic mission from the Church. Council od Trent condemned under pain of anathema thesis, that bishops or priest not send lawfully by the Church are legitimate ministers of the sacraments.
The legitimate bishops (=named by a pope) constitute the hierarchy of the Church. To cut oneself off from them, as the sedevacantists do, has already been condemned by Leo XII and Leo XIII.
These popes were targeting a group whose members denied the legitimacy of Pope Pius VII: like the sedevacantists.
Leo XII, Pastoris Aeterni: “Your Little Church cannot therefore in any way belong to the Catholic Church. By the very admission of your masters, or rather of those who deceive you, there are no longer any French bishops who support and defend the party you follow. Moreover, all the bishops of the Catholic Universe, to whom they themselves have appealed, and to whom they have addressed their schismatic claims in print, are recognized as approving the conventions of Pius VII and the acts which followed, and the whole Catholic Church is now entirely favorable to them.”
Leo XIII, Eximia nos laetitia: “Absolutely no bishop considers them and governs them as his sheep. From this they must conclude with certainty and evidence that they are defectors from the fold of Christ.
Now, just as the Little Church had no bishop who recognized them, so the sedevacantists had no legitimate bishop who recognized them, all of whom recognized the Council in 1964 and 1965 (they were consecrated under Pius XII).
What about the indult TLM? Do you attend those?
@@toddpund5761 there are no indult TLM here, only FSSP, SSPX and many independent sedevacantists
Thank you Fr mawdsley!
So right, Father. That sacrilege is inevitable is something that most have missed as they defend the NO.
Praise be to God thnk u Father 🙏
God bless you Father.
Bravo for your questions! The next step to undertake is to find a pre-1968/69 validly consecrated bishop to re-ordain you conditionally! In this way you and we will be sure that you are validly ordained to do really the Lord's work during this time of ecclesiastical eclipse.
Wow. Do you recommend also that for "confirmation"? I was baptized in a Calvinistic"church" where the pastor thinks baptism is just a symbol. So also considering conditional baptism.
@@marce.goodnews The only two sacraments that are NOT effected by the altered rite of consecration are Baptism (which can, in need, be done by anyone, provided the proper form is used) and marriage (which is contracted by the spouses, who intend to do what the Church dies). All others should be conditionally redone. As for Baptism, the mess of NO theology has made it nigh impossible to presume it has been done validly...
@@marce.goodnewsYou could definitely be conditionally reconfirmed. Confirmation is not absolutely necessary for salvation, but I wouldn’t do without it. As to baptism, check to see if the form used in your “Calvinistic” church was correct. If so, it’s valid. The sacrament is in no way dependent upon the personal opinion of the one who administers it.
"It will have SEEMED that the Church has been destroyed"- Our Lady of Good Success to Mother Mariana c.1611 speaking of our times.
Have mercy on us O Lord, hear our prayers for Thy Church, for You have said, "I make ALL THINGS new again"! Our hope is in the Name of the Lord, Now and Forever!! 🙏🏻 Stay strong brothers and sisters, love, charity and perseverance.
Thank you, Father Mawdsley, God bless you.!
According to sedevacatists, ordinary jurisdiction and power of keys, which are essential components of the Church (according for example to Trent, Vatican I, Leo XIII and Pius XII), has been realy destroyed or lost indeed.
@kamilmurawski1136 no sedevacantist teaches this. I don't know where you get that from.
I heard recently an SSPX defense of the validity of this papacy, an argument from which defense ran that, if the pope is no pope, then the bishops ordained under him are no bishops. A light went off in my mind: Yes, this explains their behavior and worldliness. They cannot be the Successors of the Apostles…
I reacted similarly. Although it would be a terrible thing if it were true, it would explain everything. And the truth is always worth having.
I don't know if it is the case. Some argue that it cannot be true, because God would never let the Church fall into such a disaster. But when I think how God has been treated over the last decades, then why shouldn't He? We need a wake up call proportionate to the distance we have strayed from Him.
@@ScriptureandTraditionFrJM Indeed, we cannot ignore the truth, no matter how unpleasant it might be.
@@ScriptureandTraditionFrJM the gates of hell cannot prevail....that's why vatican II cannot be the church
Wouldn’t it follow then, that most of the priests are invalid? If the priests are not priests, then all of their Sacraments except Baptism and Marriage are invalid. Those who have confessed their sins are not absolved and those who have received Communion have committed idolatry?
Fr., if so, then you should be conditionally re-ordained by a bishop consecrated under the old rite. I actually know someone who might do it who lives in the UK.
Thank you so much, Father.
Don’t need just eastern bishops to consecrate the Latin bishops. The SSPX bishops are validly consecrated by lefebvre in the traditional rite.
The Septuagint and ALL the books thereof need to be restored.
Well said sir, nice to hear from you today. Today I lost E. Michael Jones. I did not know he was a Bergoglian.
True, Father, thank you. We should indeed listen to them.
I certainly believe that when the Church returns to her Pre-1955 Liturgy much of the current crisis in the Church will dissipate. It was the liturgy in place for my Baptism, First Confession & Holy Communion as well as Confirmation. I hope I will receive Extreme Unction when my death is immanent and I will be buried after the proper pre-1955 Requiem Mass has been celebrated. God love you Fr.
I can calm you in one respect: for the Requiem Mass in die obitus (the very first Mass after you die) there have been no changes between the pre-55 and 1962.
Greetings from a fervent pre-55 supporter!
the Church is immaculate, by faith. She cannot make mistakes in such matters. Therefore the wording "the Church returns to her Pre-1955 Liturgy" is wrong. We have to conclude that the religion using the post-1955 Liturgy is not the Church
@@chabedou It's not God's Church that made the mistake of implementing the Novus Ordo Missae, it was the corrupt and misled hierarchy that put in place a drastic and unnecessary change in the liturgy almost to the liking of those with little faith. Perhaps you should reconsider your source of argument.
@@andrewf.castaneda4695 Paul VI promulgated the Novus Ordo...
You are on the right track. The Church needs this. We must return to Tradition. There is no other way. Ave Joseph! Ad te Joseph! Joseph will lead the way!
Our Beloved Church is infiltrated by evil . We have to rise up
the gates of hell cannot prevail...that's why vatican II cannot be the church
GOD Bless You Fr. Mawdsley. So Powerful, I Actually heard Our Lord GOD Jesus Christ Speaking From You !!! Amen. We Must return to TRUE Tradition. Although I Attend ONLY The Holy Tridentine Latin/Roman Traditional Mass. It's still the 1962 Missal. We Need to Return to The Pre 1955 Missals ..... Never going beyond the 1955 Mass !!!!! Amen. Fr.Marcel Lefeabvre Was once Again Correct. /he Even nailed it down to the 1955 Mass as you have Also Done. Ave Maria !!!!!
"Fr.Marcel Lefeabvre Was once Again Correct. /he Even nailed it down to the 1955 Mass." Lefebvre forced the 1962 Missal on the SSPX in the early 1980s.
marcel lefebvre went along with the vatican 2 liturgical changes, he failed in his duty.... why he expelled the nine? because they refused to except the liturgical changes.
Lefebvre forced the Society to use the 1962 Missal, as it continues to do.
@@littlerock5256Yes, mostly. They add in the second Confiteor, but use the 1962 Good Friday prayers. I don’t think Archbishop LeFebvre was a failure. He kept hope that Rome would come back to tradition. He wasn’t given the grace to know what we know today. It’s my guess that if he were still on earth, he’d be saying the pre-‘55 Mass.
@@mariekatherine5238 Yes, the SSPX has added back in the the people's Confiteor, which is technically an abuse, as Lefebvre had no authority to do that. However, the SSPX does not do the people's Confiteor on Holy Thursday. I agree with you, if Lefebvre were alive today I think he would do the pre-1955. I also think he would recognize that Francis does not have papal authority.
It's all masonry plans coming to fruition...we know.and Jesus is allowing it .I'm good with that!+
Anyone with a little knowledge in philology understands the weakness of the Masoretic text. It is unbelievable that our "experts" despise the Vulgate as they do.
Jesus came not to abolish the law but to fulfill. So as we should not abolish any tradition but fulfill it. God bless you Fr.
Actual popes must be actually Catholic. Thus Francis cannot possibly be an actual pope.
yeah but you still deny you have to have water to be baptised
BOD is UNIVERSAL ordinary Magesterium.
@@johnraymond-pz9bo its also rejected by the Council of Trent and the Council of Florence
Ok, so you guys reject BOD which is Ordinary magisterium, and at the same time you condemn SSPX for the rejecting ordinary magisterium. So you condemn yourself in this way.
@@kamilmurawski1136 Ezekiel 36
25 And I will pour upon you clean water, and you shall be cleansed from all your filthiness, and I will cleanse you from all your idols. 26 And I will give you a new heart, and put a new spirit within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and will give you a heart of flesh. 27 And I will put my spirit in the midst of you: and I will cause you to walk in my commandments, and to keep my judgments, and do them
Council of Florence
Ecumenical Council
"Holy baptism holds the first place among all the sacraments, for it is the gate of the spiritual life; through it we become members of Christ and of the body of the church. Since death came into the world through one person, unless we are born again of water and the spirit, we cannot, as Truth says, enter the kingdom of heaven. The matter of this sacrament is true and natural water, either hot or cold. The form is: I baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy Spirit. But we do not deny that true baptism is conferred by the following words: May this servant of Christ be baptized in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy Spirit; or, This person is baptized by my hands in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy Spirit. Since the holy Trinity is the principle cause from which baptism has its power and the minister is the instrumental cause who exteriorly bestows the sacrament, the sacrament is conferred if the action is performed by the minister with the invocation of the holy Trinity. The minister of this sacrament is a priest, who is empowered to baptize in virtue of his office. But in case of necessity not only a priest or a deacon, but even a lay man or a woman, even a pagan and a heretic, can baptize provided he or she uses the form of the church and intends to do what the church does. The effect of this sacrament is the remission of all original and actual guilt, also of all penalty that is owed for that guilt. Hence no satisfaction for past sins is to be imposed on the baptized, but those who die before they incur any guilt go straight to the kingdom of heaven and the vision of God."
"With regard to children, since the danger of death is often present and the only remedy available to them is the sacrament of baptism by which they are snatched away from the dominion of the devil and adopted as children of God, it admonishes that sacred baptism is not to be deferred for forty or eighty days or any other period of time in accordance with the usage of some people, but it should be conferred as soon as it conveniently can; and if there is imminent danger of death, the child should be baptized straightaway without any delay, even by a lay man or a woman in the form of the church, if there is no priest, as is contained more fully in the decree on the Armenians"
"It firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the catholic church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the catholic church before the end of their lives; that the unity of the ecclesiastical body is of such importance that only for those who abide in it do the church’s sacraments contribute to salvation and do fasts, almsgiving and other works of piety and practices of the Christian militia produce eternal rewards; and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed his blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and the unity of the catholic church."
Council of Trent
Ecumenical Council
" For, although no one can be just, but he to whom the merits of the Passion of our Lord Jesus Christ are communicated, yet is this done in the said justification of the impious, when by the merit of that same most holy Passion, the charity of God is poured forth, by the Holy Spirit, in the hearts of those that are justified, and is inherent therein: whence, man, through Jesus Christ, in whom he is ingrafted, receives, in the said justification, together with the remission of sins, all these (gifts) infused at once, faith, hope, and charity. For faith, unless hope and charity be added thereto, neither unites man perfectly with Christ, nor makes him a living member of His body. For which reason it is most truly said, that Faith without works is dead and profitless; and, In Christ Jesus neither circumcision, availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith which worketh by charity. This faith, Catechumen’s beg of the Church-agreeably to a tradition of the apostles-previously to the sacrament of Baptism; when they beg for the faith which bestows life everlasting, which, without hope and charity, faith cannot bestow: whence also do they immediately hear that word of Christ; If thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. Wherefore, when receiving true and Christian justice, they are bidden, immediately on being born again, to preserve it pure and spotless, as the first robe given them through Jesus Christ in lieu of that which [Page 36] Adam, by his disobedience, lost for himself and for us, that so they may bear it before the judgment-seat of our Lord Jesus Christ, and may have life everlasting."
"If any one saith, that man may be justified before God by his own works, whether done through the teaching of human nature, or that of the law, without the grace of God through Jesus Christ; let him be anathema
If any one saith, that man's free will moved and excited by God, by assenting to God exciting and calling, nowise co-operates towards disposing and preparing itself for obtaining the grace of Justification; that it cannot refuse its consent, if it would, but that, as something inanimate, it does nothing whatever and is merely passive; let him be anathema
If any one saith, that by faith alone the impious is justified; in such wise as to mean, that nothing else is required to co-operate in order to the obtaining the grace of Justification, and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be anathema
If any one saith, that men are just without the justice of Christ, whereby He merited for us to be justified; or that it is by that justice itself that they are formally just; let him be anathema
If any one saith, that men are justified, either by the sole imputation of the justice of Christ, or by the sole remission of sins, to the exclusion of the grace and the charity which is poured forth in their hearts by the Holy Ghost, and is inherent in them; or even that the grace, whereby we are justified, is only the favour of God; let him be anathema.
If any one saith, that justifying faith is nothing else but confidence in the divine mercy which remits sins for Christ's sake; or, that this confidence alone is that whereby we are justified; let him be anathema
If any one saith, that man is truly absolved from his sins and justified, because that he assuredly believed himself absolved and justified; or, that no one is truly justified but he who believes himself justified; and that, by this faith alone, absolution and justification are effected; let him be anathema
If any one saith, that nothing besides faith is commanded in the Gospel; that other things are indifferent, neither commanded nor prohibited, but free; or, that the ten commandments nowise appertain to Christians; let him be anathema.
If any one saith, that the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary unto salvation, but superfluous; and that, without them, or without the desire thereof, men obtain of God, through faith alone, the grace of justification;-though all (the sacraments) are not indeed necessary for every individual; let him be anathema.
If any one saith, that by the said sacraments of the New Law grace is not conferred through the act performed, but that faith alone in the divine promise suffices for the obtaining of grace; let him be anathema
If any one saith, that true and natural water is not of necessity for baptism, and, on that account, wrests, to some sort of metaphor, those words of our Lord Jesus Christ; Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost; let him be anathema
Council of Vienne
"All are faithfully to profess that there is one baptism which regenerates all those baptized in Christ, just as there is one God and one faith’. We believe that when baptism is administered in water in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy Spirit, it is a perfect means of salvation for both adults and children. Yet because, as regards the effect of baptism in children, we find that certain theologians have held contrary opinions, some saying that by baptism guilt is indeed remitted in infants but grace is not conferred, others on the contrary asserting that both guilt is remitted and the virtues and sanctifying grace are infused with regard to habit though for the time being not with regard to use, we, considering the general efficacy of Christ’s death, which through baptism is applied in like manner to all the baptised, choose, with the approval of the sacred council, the second opinion, which says that sanctifying grace and the virtues are conferred in baptism on both infants and adults, as more probable and more in harmony with the words of the saints and of modern doctors of theology."
Fourth Council of Lateran
Ecumenical Council
"But the sacrament of baptism is consecrated in water at the invocation of the undivided Trinity - namely Father, Son and holy Spirit - and brings salvation to both children and adults when it is correctly carried out by anyone in the form laid down by the church."
"Certain people who have come voluntarily to the waters of sacred baptism, as we learnt, do not wholly cast off the old person in order to put on the new more perfectly."
This is a fantastic explanation of what has happened to our Church. My family will continue to pray for this good Priest, and our wonderful Holy Catholic Church.
Amazingly clear teaching. Thank you dear Father Mawdsley! You are doing God’s work. May He greatly reward you!
Thank you, Fr JM.
Thank you Father. Keep up the Good fight.
I will only read and trust the Douay-Rheims Bible.
That's just as ignorant as KJV only Protestants. The only difference is that the Douay-Rheims is a trustworthy translation and the KJV is not. But to say it's the ONLY trustworthy translation is just contrary to intellectual honesty and Church teaching
Thank you Father Mawdsley
Very insightful and informative and I will continue to pray that God restore His Holy Order 🙏✝️🙏
God bless you Father ❤
Thank you, Father.
A true pope, even if a great sinner, is prevented by the Holy Spirit from teaching or approving anything injurious to Catholic faith or morals. That has been the case since Pentecost. But all the Vatican II papal claimants have done so. That's the basis for the theological argument for sedevacantism. But there must be a reason how this could have happened, and that's where knowledge of what happened at the 1958 papal conclave is important, as the White Smoke 1958 site explains. The long prophesied Great Apostasy and "eclipse" of the Church (Our Lady of La Salette) is something that should not surprise us, since the Church, like its Divine Head, according to God's permissive will and for His greater glory, is to undergo its Passion, (quasi-) Death, and Resurrection, the latter being the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. All the evidence points to 1958 as the beginning of what has come to be the enemy takeover of the papacy and the visible structures of the Church, but not the Church itself. As St Athanasius said, "Even if the number of Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a mere handful, they are the true Church of Jesus Christ."
So define what the Church is. If Chuch can be deprived of entire hierarchy and jurisdiction, and papacy, and possibility of having pope in future, than hierarchy, jurisdiction and papacy are accidental, not essential for the Church. But this is protestant ecclesiology, condemnned by Council of Trent and Vatican I era magisterial teachings
@@kamilmurawski1136 The believers. The people. If the church was built ON a person, BY a person, then it is the people. Why would it be a building or a hierarchy lol, something thats easily corrupted and destroyed
Áve María, grátia pléna, Dóminus técum. Benedícta tu in muliéribus, et benedíctus
frúctus véntris túi, Jésus.
Sáncta María, Máter Déi, óra pro nóbis peccatóribus, nunc et in hóra mórtis nóstrae.
Amen.
Amen
This was AWESOME! Thank you Father, for your fidelity to Holy Tradition and the Magisterium. I will watch this a few times more, as it clarifies many things for me. God bless you and may Our Lady pray for you always!
Bless you Father!
Thank you Fr. Mawdsley!!!
They've gotten everything right. God bless MHFM and I hope to see a discussion between the Brothers Dimond and Father Mawdsley, soon.
God bless you , father Mawdsley, for your words of truth--may what you said be heard by the whole world and return to the faith -Lord have mercy on us.
Aloha and Mahalo from Hawai’i Fr. Mawdsley.
I thank God for finding your videos packed with information.
May God continue to bless you on all of your endeavors in standing up for the Truth!
God Love you!
God bless you Father. I would seek conditional re-ordination if I were you. Please pray about it.
I fully agree. Thank you, Father.
Thank you Fr may God bless and protect you.
..thank you father for the clarity….I really revered bishop athanasius and father ripperger…but they all deny this truth of changingthe liturgy (From 1955)and the malice of Vatican 2 ……OUR LADY OF SORROWS LEAD ME HERE TO YOUR PAGE…do not compromise father with them that love both masters….I pray that they leave that Pharisees yeast and STAND FIRM IN CHRIST …our lady has guided you all these years and she will until you reach heaven …
AVE MARIA
The Modernists have taken over. End of story. Until they are out, we need not stress what they do as the vast majority like it there and are not Catholics as hard as it was to accept. What we need to worry about is the amount of souls being lost in the Novus Ordo.
I listened to this while in the SSPX and i didn't really understand it much. Now I'm listening to it as a Sedevacantist, and it's so clear. I hope this Priest accepts the fact that you can not be too focused on the Liturgy, but understand that Vatican II is a substantial change to the Church, therefore the modern "Popes" are presiding over something else and not the Catholic Church.
The sedevacantists, including Rev. Cekada, never said that the pope does not have the authority to make changes to the Latin Mass or other liturgies, but it must remain a Catholic rite. The pope must be Catholic. He is not above God's law. The Catholic Church and a true pope cannot err in matters of faith and morals - they are infallible. All Catholics must obey a true pope. Where the pope is, there is the Church. The pope can never teach heresy. No Councils are valid without a true pope's approval - in whole or regarding specific teachings. The Vatican II "Council" was not Catholic. It established a new, evil religion. The pope cannot lead souls toward sin. It is not just the Supreme Magisterium which must be believed, but also the Ordinary Universal Magisterium. The change of all the traditional sacraments and rites invalidated them. This priest is going in the correct direction!!! Keeping the doctrines and morals of the Church is crucial. It cannot be just the Mass. Catholics must keep the Faith, and veering off even by one point means leaving the Catholic Church. There can be no picking and chosing on established doctrine.
Father, thank you for your wisdom and your guidance. May God bless and keep you.
Thank you FATHER for your encouragement for us.is very unfortunate us to remain Catholics. Thank you FATHER so much
Thank you Fr M from Florida 🇺🇸
Amen 🙏 thank you Fr.
Simply great! Blessed be God!
It is no surprise after reading Botte that a secular character has taken over our prelates since the late 1960s. Their readiness to conform to the laws of secular authorities during COVID certainly reinforces this. There is a pattern among older and corrupt religious orders and priests in their calling on "The Spirit" for many things. Why can't they ask the "Holy Spirit," or "Ghost?" The text of the Synodal Documents also refers to this" Spirit." They do not dare ask the Holy Spirit, or Ghost for anything. Instead they call on the spirit of evil, the result of which is never good.
Amen
We can never leave our church. The keys of heaven wasn't given to any group outside the church. They don't speak by the holy ghost. They don't even agree among themselves. They are more like protestant.
Father Cekada was a brilliant and holy priest.
Father Wiseman, SSPX, did a fantastic podcast and video on this subject called ‘The Limits of Obedience In Light of Traditiones Custodes’
I too fully agree... Thank you so much ,Fr... God bless
Blessings and appreciation to you Father from Sydney Australia .
Traditional Latin Mass,
Daily Rosary
Confessions
Holy communion only on the tongue.
I'm glad that a Novus Ordo "Priest" like you have objectively studied the problem of the TLM true valid mass vs INVALID new mass of Paul VI secondly the VALID traditional episcopal consecration vs INVALID 1968 consecration. There are two Novus Ordo "Priest" of Vatican II like you, but they have come to a conclusion that they are invalidly ordained presbyters. These two Priest have to under go into a sedevacantist Traditional Catholic Seminary only to be formed and ordained true catholic priest by traditional and valid bishops. Fr. Michael Oswalt (Rockford Illinois) went to CMRI under Bp Pivarunas and Fr. Michael DeSaye (Scranton New Jersey) went to MHTS under Bp Sanborn. Both have you tube interviews.
For the record: I never attended a Novus Ordo seminary, never learnt to say it, never have said it and never will. (Thought I better clear that up.)
I will look up their interviews, thank you for the information, I’m sure there will be more priests that come to the same conclusion
Fr. Cekada wrote a great book about the new mass called work of human hands. Absolutely excellent book!
read it, brilliant book.
Sedevacantists don’t say merely that the Pope is not above tradition but that a true Pope is a canonically elected Catholic man who had the assistance of the Holy Ghost who can never harm the Church or impose error.
I heard that Pius IX said: "I am Tradition", so he might belive he was above Tradition
Lay people seldom come to know these crisis in the Universal Church. Unshaken Faith in Triune God is essential for Salvation.
I am sedevacantist, but wanted to thank SSPX for defending Our Lady when Francis disgustingly attacked Coredemptrix teaching.
Any defense of Our Lady is very precious to me.
Btw, I have researched these men in white... Some very wicked things from Roncalli (hated Assumption), JP2 denied Marian doctrine Inc BEHOLD YOUR MOTHER. Francis also denied Immaculate Conception. Pachamana over Her who stood as a young teenager and heard dreadful Prophecy of Simeon.
We need to honor Her more and more. The VALIANT, MERCIFUL MOTHER.
By the way, Peter Dimond of MHFM also belives that Blessed Virgin Mary should NOT be called Coredemptrix.
Feeneyites such ad Simon's get sedevacantism right. They get UOM , BOD wrong and ain't Catholic. Pope Plus XI, A true pope called Her Coredemptrix.
Dimons aren't free to reject a Popes teaching.
The 5th Marian Dogma will br declared by pope when we get one, imo
Visible church? MHTS , SGG , CMRI IN USA have Masses, Baptisms, Confirmations , religious classes etc
My priest flies Ohio to Austin. Monthly
People drive border to Austin quarterly
How we get a new pope? Father Cekada discusses this. An imperfect conclave. False Cardinals miraculously convert. I reject this.
Or miracle. Peter and Paul descending from Heaven and crowning pope... This is prophecy WAY BEFORE 1958.
I have a couple ways, but sedes can be cowardly...
Pope Pius XI called Her Coredemptrix. Popes are solidifying around this
AMEN!
God bless you too Father. You are a holy priest.
I fear changes that may come and I know our holy mother tells us this will happen. I sit and think sometimes what I can do except pray.
One thing I really don't like about these issues is that Catholics completely write off sedevacantists because they don't accept their position. This is absurd. I am not a sedevacantist, I believe that it is not a logical or tenable position for a Catholic. That being said, they make a lot of points that every Catholic should hear, including the ones that Fr Mawdsley brings up in this video.
it is not logical or tenable to believe in a holy church and accept that the vatican II church is such
No, all Catholics don’t write off sedevacantists. I sometimes attend Mass at a sedevacantist chapel. The priest knows I don’t totally embrace sedevacantism and is okay with that. This is an issue that must be decided by a future true Pope. No one else has the authority to make that determination.
It is ironic to me that the initial NO for Novus Ordo screams "no" to it all.
God is alive and so hope does not die. I attend a Sedevacantist Catholic church, but I'm convinced that the hunger for tradition will breed a deeper obedience in young priests and in time the errors will be corrected: all Catholics will kneel before the altar to worship the source of our gladness and joy, we will suffer through these errors for Christ and He will bless His bride for it.
Sedevacantists do not consitute Catholic Church nor are part of it - at least according to catholic ecclesiology. For to be Church you must have bishop with ordinary jurisdiction.
Thank you Father.🕊️🙏
Thankyou father for the truth 🙏 ❤ like jesus said I am telling the truth❤jesus is the way the truth and the light 🙏 God has got your back father ❤
I am SO lucky to be a Byzantine catholic! We NEVER have to have that thought in the back of our mind that our bishops might not be valid, or our sacraments might not he valid, or about any modern inovations in our liturgy. I still think it will be the Eastern churches that will reevangelize the west!
We've been setting up mission churches at different NO parishes to expose their parishioners to actual beauty and orthodoxy. Its working too!
Glory to Jesus Christ
Slava isusu Christu!
There are some Novus Ordo priests that have changed their rites to the Byzantine Catholic (I know of two who are now Ruthenian) They would be offering invalid Divine Liturgies. The Byzantines are not immune to this
well done and well said
Thank you.
God bless you Fr.
Father. No need to go to the eastern orthodox to remove doubts of validity. if the eastern orthodox are valid, surely the sede vacante bishops are valid.
Thank you Father God bless
God bless you Padre
And God Bless you Fr.
Thank you for this great video! It means a lot to take these ideas serious and to examine them as so
I pray with you and even sent this to SPPX priory pastor. Priests, we cannot assume they have all the knowledge they need .
Thank you 🙏🙏🙏
Dear Father, you should teach our Pope the teachings of the True Church. I consider myself a sedevacantist because he is blessing homosexual unions, banning priests such as Fr Frank Pavone, the holy Bishop Strickland from Texas, etc.. Every priest who is holy, he wants to get rid of but yet he idolizes and places idols such as the Pachimama , an African godess of fertility on the altar of St Peter during Mass.etc..no Latin mass though. I could go on and on. Thank you father for staying true to the Holy Roman Catholic Church.
What a very informative video. Thank you, Fr. Mawdsley.
I've never engaged in conversations with any Sedevacantists (but I would), however, during lockdown I met a Sedeprivationist who invited me to Holy Mass (Pre-55 Liturgy) on someone's farm. I didn't go, though. As far as I understand, they do not think that the Chair of St. Peter has ever been vacant but that all of the popes since Vatican II, including the one we have now (J. Bergoglio? Pope Benedict?)were/are material heretics and that the present pope, in order for him to be truly capable of exercising authority to govern and teach, must recant the changes of Vatican II so that there can be true unity again. I'm sure you already know this, father. it was the first I had ever heard of this sect.
I had never heard of this group before your comment. Glad you mentioned it.
They're right.
ruclips.net/video/0DmRxNm6MeA/видео.html
“Sedeprivationists” believe the Vatican II anti-Popes are formal heretics and outside the Church, which is true. They don’t regard them as true Popes with any authority. The confusing part is, they believe they are “material” Popes, and have the power to elect Cardinals, among other things. The truth is, a heretic can hold no jurisdiction in the Church.
"it was the first I had ever heard of this sect." My Catholic Dictionary says that sect "has no precise meaning" and that is it most commonly applied to "protestant denominations". What do you mean by using the word sect in relation to sedeprivationists?