China, Elon Musk and the Space Race to Launch Thousands of Satellites | WSJ U.S. vs. China
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 май 2024
- To keep up with Elon Musk’s Starlink and the U.S., China plans to launch thousands of broadband satellites into low-Earth orbit. Of the roughly 8,000 functioning satellites in orbit, about 55% belong to SpaceX’s Starlink. China is making strides as more satellite companies like SatNet are getting more funding and making advancements.
WSJ explores how broadband satellites work and whether China can secure its spot in a crowded stretch of space.
0:00 China building its capabilities
1:03 How broadband satellites work
2:46 China’s space sector
4:55 Global expansion of satellite broadband
6:32 Overcrowding in low-Earth orbit
U.S. vs. China
This original video series explores the rivalry between the two superpowers’ competing efforts to develop the technologies that are reshaping our world.
#SpaceX #China #WSJ
every village in China has access to either 4G or 5G or both, so 342M people without internet is probably from data 20 years ago.
"As of December 2022, the size of non-netizens in China was 344 million, down 37.22 million from
December 2021." from China Internet Network Information Center
@@cuihaoify 那些都是非常小的小孩和很老的老人。
@@cuihaoify Most of them are child and elderly people.
Same thing in Africa. Areas without 4G are becoming few, and at the current pace, there will be no use case for satellite internet by the time it’s ready.
@@cuihaoifynon netizen是不上网，不是没有Wi-Fi😂
362 million people no internet in your dream
That shows the quality of WSJ research 😂
read it yourself, from china internet network information center
@@cuihaoify 珠穆朗玛峰都有人直播，怎么会漏了这些人。这个数字是说这些人不使用互联网，不代表他们生活的地方没有互联网。
@@cuihaoify I've already replied on another thread, but I'll copy and paste it here :
Your quoted source is beside the point.
There are people not on the internet for various reasons.
The reporter is saying there are 362 million people without access to the internet *MEANING THEY CANNOT GET ACCESS TO* the internet.
.... And that supposedly they will be able to access the internet IF THERE WAS INTERNET COVERAGE.
They is what the reporter is saying.
What I'm saying is there *IS* internet coverage covering the ENTIRE country. It's *NOT* that they don't have coverage. It's that they are not on the internet for various reasons.
I can list MANY reasons : Eg, babies and toddlers ; very old people ; a monk or nun ; a hermit ; a recluse not having a phone ; etc etc etc.
These people WON'T be on the internet regardless of whether you have a million satellite constellation above your head.
China *DOES NOT* have a non internet coverage issue.
362m Chinese don't hv internet, that is a straight lie.
It's based on ccp reports. Rural china is unlike anything those urban china. Old people still prefer their country lifestyle
Yeah. mobile coverage is 99%, I wonder how the 362m got left alone.
@@TheKing-xp7lqthen it's probably more lol
@@TheKing-xp7lq Many people can't read, but some old people around me can't read but understand, they only install an APP on their mobile phones, Tik Tok.
How can one belittle others and elevate oneself without saying that
342M Chinese live in non-internet coverage area? Do you really mean it?
342M Chinese are most elderly， they don't use internet not because they aren't in in coverage but they are reluctant to use electronic gadget
估计是老人小孩加一起的数字，珠峰脚下都有网红直播了 不是网络的问题
就这一句话，就知道这视频 毫无任何真相和逻辑可言！
you are one of awke person not fooled by those false medias. as a Chinese I can hardly find a person can't access to Internet in mainland China. only few areas not covered with 5G.
西方人的話語術, 就算他不抹黑中國，他們也玩弄文字和數據, 來營造自己的優越感, 當我聽到他說，中國做哪些東西是試驗性的時候, 我就看不下去了. alan musk, space x做哪些東西不是在試驗階段嗎，是在邊做邊出問題邊改, 遠不到成功的時候.
At the beginning of the video, the data made me laugh out loud. You only said that 362 million Chinese people did not have access to the internet, but did not say that the total population of children under 10 years old and elderly people over 70 years old in China exceeded 340 million, which indirectly mocked how weak China is, right?
In other word,more than 1000000000 chinese have access to the internet😂. 3x the number of usa
Also, China has the largest number of 5G stations in the world to date.
我妈妈今年83岁，现在与他的姐妹街坊邻居的日常联系就是手机微信软件
@@vonbuted898 yeah, it says it in the video. pay attention
most children under 10 years old and most elder people over 70 have access to the internet by useing 5G mobile and ipad
The real question is here: Why are so many pieces of debris wandering in low-earth orbit? According to many space and satellite experts, the USA holds more than 50% of the total satellites in orbit. So did NASA not have precise and efficient protocols to maintain/dispose of their old/broken equipment? Shouldn't NASA be accountable for its poor satellite management and operation? I guess America is going to blame the Chinese or Russians when the satellite overcrowding happens in a few years.
That’s exactly what they’ll do, that’s why the rush to get up there. They’ll have the upper hand in blaming others for problems.
I don't think you grasp how small these pieces of debris are compared to the vastness of space
Never seen one Chinese without internet. Where did you find 362M?
Insane to consider satellite internet infrastructure is anywhere near as cost-effective as land based
@@kanding3369the problem I have with spacex is that they don’t plan to just cover rural areas, they plan to cover EVERYWHERE. Makes sense over the ocean and over sparely populated parts of the world, but they’re purposefully launching enough to cover the entire world which is beyond wasteful. At that point, they’re just inflating the demand for their own rocket service.
It is more reliable and performant so it could be more profitable if the market is able to facilitate equilibrium using price and quantity of service expected quality to find a price point (set by private sector businesses competing).
As I understand it, Space Force and NASA must coordinate for various reasons including international conflict affecting market security ....
It is more cost effective. Maybe if you had a brain you’d be able to tell that too.
depends on the situation, for remote areas, it could very well be more cost-effective
What this report doesn't cover and fails to mention is that almost all of that investment, and MORE, has already been wasted and near zero return. Because tens of thousands of "start-ups" as well as existing companies, many in industries that had nothing to do with space or tech in general, created offshoot companies to claim these subsidies from the government and used it as a money grab. This is not an exaggeration, this is a gross under exaggeration. Literally billions in funds from China's tech subsidies was completely wasted and many of the companies have disappeared or went under.
Sending more and more satellites without cleaning and clearing the past space debris making the biggest trap which may hamper the future space exploration
Any volunteers?
@@FighterFlashhow about making people/entities clean up their own mess??
Yes,SpaceX needs to send some JCB's to clean up the space debris...🥲🥲😅😅
Just like unknown planet in lost in space. Good point bro.
Modern satellites are designed to self-deorbit after a certain lifetime. There won't be new space debris unless a satellite gets shot with a missile or hits an asteroid
Here in China: if you spend 4 USD a month like I do, you can get 150G data traffic (5G/4G...), and 100 minutes of free phone call. Answering a phone call is free of charge.
I don't know the cost in the US.
In new York, $100 USD/month u get 5 phones all with unlimited 4g data. I don't think it's as fast as 5g but I can stream RUclips no issue everyday while I m driving.
Here in India, you can get unlimited calling & SMS + 60GB(4G/5G) Internet, if you spend 2.5 USD a month
@@yuglobalcitizen2246I traveled a lot in America.some places have totally no internet signal
Good info 👍
Lol , almost everyone has internet in China !!
I don't trust that 362 million number in the beginning. I believe there may be that many people who don't frequently use the internet (could be they are too young or too old), but that's not the same as "not having access".
@@lucascavalcantidossantos Many elderly people in China don't know how to use smartphones, they only use phones like Nokia
The internet penetration in rural China is 62% (293 million people) it’s lower than the Urban which is 84% for sure but it isn’t that low to be honest and it’s rising really fast
(1.9 million 5G stations, covering 96% of counties and towns in the country)
Look at all those Xl Dumping Debre everywhere... like the Polusian on Earth.....
*Have* *u* *seen* *the* *RiversBeaches?* Every Step I take... *Everywhere*
This doesn’t count those use app users on their mobile device, who uses WeChat QR pay even the furthest rural area.
@@lucascavalcantidossantos No, that is impossible, I am a Chinese living in a small village in China, every body has a smart phone, it is unimaginable for us who live here without phones, other than the children or the lderly.
It’s not about money or profit. It’s about military and LEO orbits.
US military & Chinese military gonna compete
ding ding ding ding, we got a winner
Usa is more about military power gains...
Just look at its own cities and its people.
Vs what China has....
Big big difference
(Obviously those who has been to both will understand)
Por que no los dos?
@simpolang Big differences, China just put them up for face and self padding... disregard any social, environmental, etc impacts. Nothing more for its people, but for outsiders to see how Great China is moto, a facade.
Did they mean the old generation that didn't want to use internet in China?
add the 3ys baby
What's funny is Elon looks more Chinese than the Chinese.
YUP
already liked the videom @ 1:42 please, include km to the number presentation
Thanks, Greetings from Greece
where is the data "362 million" in the beginning of this video come from? 🤔
Pure propaganda video to make you think China is far behind.
If it is 362 million people in China doesn't have Internet access, that would mean the other 1100 million people have Internet access. US is the one need to play catch up, not China..
I also doubt it, it is ridiculous
Although, it is still better than saying the Chinese dictatorship plans to rule the world
It's on Wikipedia as well. This is just the commonly sourced number. "As of July 2023, 1.05 billion (73.7% of the country's total population) use internet in China."
@@Ergzay china has many people who live in rural areas, I think they don't need the internet, not that they don't have access to the internet.
Low earth orbit is usually more like 200 miles altitude... the international space station is a good example. Apparently LEO includes up to 1/3rd Earth's radius.
The video makes a massive blunder. lol
Yes
i think if you are talkin about space satellite deliviries you should also mention isro aswell
this news is completely wrong. In China, the internet access coverage is nearly 100%, even 5g coverage is more than 4g in the US. the space internet is not for commercial use, it's too expensive and completely not necessary. it will be only military use.
“上个月，中国互联网络信息中心 (CNNIC) 发布的第49次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》也显示，截至2021年12月，我国网民规模达10.32亿，与联网普及率达73.0%。无法上网用户占比同样超过1/4.”
ISRO sitting in Silence and laughing 😂😂😂
and why?
The Chinese one lacks the twitter technology of spacex
Now its the time for real estate in space.
Very interesting
where is the data "362 million" in the beginning of this video come from? Really fake news, you'd better show me the data source.
Pure propaganda video to make you think China is far behind.
If it is 362 million people in China doesn't have Internet access, that would mean the other 1100 million people have Internet access. US is the one need to play catch up, not China..
Many people have no idea how big a billion is. China has 1.41 billion population.
fake news
fake news
I'm still waiting for my since April 1st 2021
Come on! Your scale for GEO vs LEO is messed up!
it's nothing to do with how many people not online, it's about strategic and military potential.
every body knows what happen in Ukraine
When I hear it, I just laughed. They think we are so naive to the point that we don't understand the real motives behind it.
@@dnn32 Pure propaganda video to make you think China is far behind.
If it is 362 million people in China doesn't have Internet access, that would mean the other 1100 million people have Internet access. US is the one need to play catch up, not China..
Many people have no idea how big a billion is. China has 1.41 billion population.
I'm old enough to see "life report" of the gulf war on television, but we know received the news what happened in Ukraine just couple hour and everyone there had cameras on their phones...its crazy 😅
Thanks we have more satellites over our heads now.
Emissions Emissions amd more CO2 Emissions. Elon is smart to Off set SpaceX CO2 Emissions with Tesla. But whether Tesla's EVs are the best for vehicles powered by renewables, that's another story
Its a big opportunity for space x, alot of people around the world have no access to internet because of their remote locations.
Elon will make you pay a fortune for whatever social work you think he'll do with this
And most of them can only spend about 10$ for it a month!
A lot of people *EXCEPT* in China though.
Just about EVERYONE has internet access in China.
WSJ is probably mixing up people who don't have landline internet service with people who don't have internet service.
That is not the same thing!
No-one in China has no internet service. Just about EVERYONE has a smartphone.
In China, you can access the internet with a smartphone EVEN IN THE MIDDLE OF A DESERT.
It's 100% coverage.
@@gabrielaleactus9932 what
@@brunoheggli2888 even $10/month is too much for the majority
‘362 million don’t have internet?’ What a shade, also where is the resource for this number?
Yes, I’m highly skeptical of this number, I’ve seen vloggers upload from remote no man’s land areas in Xinjiang.
@@mabelaeroThe number is so absurd, I never found someone here without the Internet, aka without a phone.
@@mabelaero Pure propaganda video to make you think China is far behind.
If it is 362 million people in China doesn't have Internet access, that would mean the other 1100 million people have Internet access. US is the one need to play catch up, not China..
Many people have no idea how big a billion is. China has 1.41 billion population.
A quick google will show that number.
@@mabelaero Just because the vlogger can get to internet doesn't mean each individual has internet. There's plenty of areas in the world where you can _go_ somewhere and get access to the internet but it doesn't mean you have access to the internet from home.
Stop comparing each other as if it is a zero sum game. It is a win-win situation, always.
I'm traveling to the US in 2019. I'm going from Los Angeles to San Francisco ending up in Salt Lake City and then to Yellowstone National Park. The internet quality was good while in Los Angeles and San Francisco. But on the highway to Salt Lake City and many places in Yellowstone National Park there is no 3G 4G signal. I am from Guizhou, China, one of the poorest provinces in China. But all of our counties here have highways and 4G signal all the way. All the popular places in our province have 5G signal. So I can't understand why an attraction like Yellowstone National Park would still have no 5G signal.
@@freedomlogical All villages have access to broadband and 4G networks. This is a fact that just happened in 2022. It's just because of the difference in the way the statistics are done. If China's statistics are used, the Internet penetration rate in the United States will be greatly reduced. I have been to many typical remote areas in our region, which are more than 70km away from the central area by car, and the altitude difference from the central area is more than 2000 meters. Even villages with only five or six households can access 500m downlink broadband.
@@freedomlogical Universal broadband service in all villages is an achievement that Chinese telecom companies are touting every day in 2022.
@@freedomlogical Please name the village. China already has 100% of villages with fiber optic internet and 4G signals. If it's a single house in one of those no man's land in Tibet then there may be no internet. But any administrative village already has internet signal.
China is only racing to cover the internet because they want to show off to the world, but in essence, they are still copying American technology.
Using fuel to launch a rocket is classical 🦃
With s big statement in the beginning, it should be easy for China to de-Internet from almost 100% of 4g/5g coverage to 75% by simply cutting off the power.
WSJ needs to do better research than this.
Just about EVERYONE in China has a smartphone.
In fact, in the earlier days you can't even pay by cash in some shops. You need a phone to pay for items.
And ALL smartphones in China can access the internet, EVEN in the middle of a desert!
WSJ probably got mixed up with people who don't have landline internet service with people who don't have internet.
They are not the same thing.
@@ChinaSongsCollection It's mostly children and the elderly that do not have access. When you consider China's 1 billion+ population and demographics it's really not that much overall.
@@CausticLemons7 Hi. But that's not what the reporter meant.
The reporter is talking about internet coverage.
She is saying there are 362 million people without access to the internet meaning they CANNOT GET ACCESS TO the internet.
.... And that supposedly they will be able to access the internet IF THERE WAS INTERNET COVERAGE.
That is what the reporter is saying.
So what I'm saying is there IS internet coverage covering the entire country. It's NOT that they don't have coverage. It's that they are not on the internet for various reasons.
These people WON'T be on the internet regardless of whether they send more satellite constellations above our heads.
China DOES NOT have a non internet coverage issue.
@@ChinaSongsCollection it's according to China . Most of those are elders , check comments
@@unknown2723 The other person already mentioned that. I've already responded to the comment.
Please read my response.
He is a national security threat
4:30 counterproductive concept
Game over for Space X
Is no one else losing their mind at the fact that a single American company owns 55% of all satelites in orbit?
ELON musk is a south africans, not american
Guess what % of Tesla is made in China? :)
and all those space junk out there
Nope. Because SpaceX is owned by Elon Musk and the internet/media hates him and downplays everything.
@@xinyiquan666Is Google a Russian company just because on of its founders fled from Russia?
Can we not?
What about rocket lab?
I know the space industry worldwide is not controlled properly. But somehow they should be made to clean up X amount of spent space junk before they can launch a new object.
Great traffic jam or junk in outer space. It may create great hindrance to launch satellites of another countries for research and technology.
Thanks to Elon's work and visions for over 20 years ,we have the great space race
Do you think a company can compete with a country, hahahahahaha 2025 and we'll see you later
@@coolewily8185 I dunno, SpaceX has launched more rockets in 2023 than any other entity.
@@coolewily8185CHINA CONTROLLED SPACE AGENCY IS GOVT OWNED, UNLIKE STARLINK, MEANT FOR GENERATING MAX REVENUES. CHINA IS MORE IN COMPETITION WITH NASA, TO PROVE THEY ARE BEST. FOR SENDING SATELLITES, NO OTHER COUNYRY BARRING PADISTAN & FEW POOR COUNTRIES WILL RELY ON CHINA FOR SENDING THEIR SENSITIVE COMMUNICATION SATELLITES, INTO SPACE.
@@alxz3707launch more small rockets for the project starlink. china just started starlink concept project, u will see china will launch hundreds rocket if not thousands for that purpose 😂
@@fannyalbi9040 while an alternative satellite internet constellation is good for many purposes. China will no doubt be a contender for a top satellite constellation, though they will probably not be able to catch up to SpaceX for a long time. SpaceX is also ramping up cadence as well. In addition to the thousands of satellites already up there, it will be a while until China catches up, if they commit to their satellite constellation.
Only by competing with each other can human progress!
Over 300 million people don’t have access to the internet? As a native Chinese, I highly doubt the authenticity of this number.
Be real,
this is SpaceX vs China (or some Chinese company?).
Change my mind.
Space x is a company in the USA, run by Americans and loyal to America
China's private aerospace company called "LandScape" beated SpaceX with the world's first methane fuel rocket launch...
what is the average life span of satelite . 5 years ? 10 years ? what will happen to all these satelites after that
Starlink satellites will deorbit after there use is done. The ploblem in Elon has no plans for sattiltes that were dead on arrival or damaged before lifespan ended and can’t deorbit themselves
@@TheAmericanCatholic They'll deorbit regardless because they're in such low orbits. Even without intentional deorbiting, the atmosphere brings them down in a couple years.
LEO satellites sounds like a nightmare in space pollution, hope that concern is kept in mind while operating.
I'm only asking for metric measurements, as an international view
US: FRAAAP (fart)
China: did you hear that?! let's copy it.
Glad that China did not copy the US gun policy
Like aircraft seperation there is a mechanism in side the UN Space Treaty as quoted here there must be at least a 2degree sepperation in the orbital track, 100's of thousands of aircraft criss-cross the skys with on a .03 of a degree of separation (1000' / 300000') separation diveided by total hight. Ther volume of 1 starlink Satalite is is amout the size of a kitch table. and because microwaves ahve a wave length os 1 anstom they will basicall pass thtoug a cluster of other satalites as if the were not there. Space Collision only happen in the Movies
We will always support this channel. They're incredible at what they do.
👍👍👍👍yeah we do
Pure propaganda video to make you think China is far behind.
If it is 362 million people in China doesn't have Internet access, that would mean the other 1100 million people have Internet access. US is the one need to play catch up, not China..
Many people have no idea how big a billion is. China has 1.41 billion population.
But they DEFINITELY need to do better research.
I can assure you that the very first statement is not only incorrect, it is EXTREMELY FAR from the truth!!
Internet service in China covers the ENTIRE country of China (including the deserts! YES INCLUDING THE DESERTS)
And just about *EVERYONE* has a smartphone. So EVERYONE regardless of in the city or in the rural areas *HAS* internet service.
In fact, in the earlier days you can't even pay by cash in some shops. You need a phone to pay for items.
It was EXTREMELY hard to survive in China without a smartphone! It still is although the government has recently made it mandatory for shops to accept cash.
WSJ probably mixed up people who don't have landline internet service with people who don't have internet service. Millions of people in China don't have landline internet service.
But that is not the same thing. No-one in China has no internet service
😂
BeiDou is far more advanced than GPS, but WSJ says it's "comparable to GPS".LMAO~😂
Not more advanced than the GPS III/IIIF
@@Ronmexico211 On wikipedia it does
@@Ronmexico211 Yup, first it's a regional, not global navigation system. Second it's only about 10% the accuracy of GPS and 10x the cost per receiver.
@@huas5350 It's a good thing everything on wikipedia is true.
Wrong. Its a global navigation network like GPS. It provides better accuracy in China and Asia Pacific region than the latter. No idea about the cost.
Whats the point of slow spotty expensive satellite connection without some degree of information flow ? (hint: China's Great Firewall)
Interesting how they pronounced beidou correctly
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Where the 362million number come from? 😮 that’s not true
中国互联网络信息中心
@@cuihaoify 逻辑是人口-上网人数=没有网络覆盖的人数？ 这合理吗？
@@Im-mono 362 million听起来很大，其实在中国不算大。。
Pure propaganda video to make you think China is far behind.
If it is 362 million people in China doesn't have Internet access, that would mean the other 1100 million people have Internet access. US is the one need to play catch up, not China..
Many people have no idea how big a billion is. China has 1.41 billion population.
@@Im-mono “上个月，中国互联网络信息中心 (CNNIC) 发布的第49次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》也显示，截至2021年12月，我国网民规模达10.32亿，与联网普及率达73.0%。无法上网用户占比同样超过1/4.”
@@cuihaoify 没有上网和无法上网是一回事吗？
I have complete faith in China. They never disappoint in terms of results, while the quality differs sometimes.
India Providing 5G Internet with it's own satellites......Should have mentioned that
No double. The only country is capable to compete with the USA is the great nation - India in the world
@anthonyverdi7394 But even the US can't compete with China in terms of internet coverage.
Internet service covers the ENTIRE country of China (including the deserts! YES INCLUDING THE DESERTS)
And just about EVERYONE has a smartphone. So EVERYONE regardless of in the city or in the rural areas HAS internet service.
That is one thing that the US does not have. That is the reason they need someone like Elon Musk.
(PS. WSJ mixed up people who don't have landline internet service with people who don't have internet service. That is not the same thing. No-one in China has no internet service)
@@ChinaSongsCollectionAre you ok? You really don’t think most people in the US have a phone?
@@defintity_9951 No, I didn't say that.
Of course people have smartphones!
I was talking about internet coverage. Not phone ownership.
That's not the same thing. If you don't have signals, you can't go online.
And we still have flat earthers 😂
我的妈呀开篇第一句话就无敌了😋
“上个月，中国互联网络信息中心 (CNNIC) 发布的第49次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》也显示，截至2021年12月，我国网民规模达10.32亿，与联网普及率达73.0%。无法上网用户占比同样超过1/4.”
@@cuihaoify 珠穆朗玛峰都有人直播，怎么会漏了这些人。这个数字是说这些人不使用互联网，不代表他们生活的地方没有互联网。
中国人自己踏实做就行，它们爱说啥咱不管。如果把它们说的话当真，中国人就没法发展了。
6:25 this dude sounds like Blackberry, Steve Balmer and co when iPhone launched
starlink is basically used by military....no surprise there
China should step in so any cost correction to starlink
I don't think this is accurate...even in tve most remote places...internet 4G..5G is very often surprisingly availiable...
It is said...during frequent earthquake...Huawei engineers are often on the ground first...even faster then tbe army..
Restarting communication is 👍
Elon Musk's success has peaked it seems to me. He and Zuckerberg jumping the shark together.
I don't think so. You have to take a closer look at things, dude.
China won't oust SpaceX with their rockets.
The man is only just getting started with Starship.
@@mymixedbiscuit9159 Twitter rebranded to X seemed like a doubtful move but it could actually turn out to be the correct move since X will be much more than just messaging, so I have changed my mind a bit and Elon Musk's success may still increase, we will see.
Competition is good.
寇可往，我亦可往！
Ardo 1b for pmi
what race? All these launches have been planned years ago.
How many LEO satellites would it take, assuming they’re painted with reflective material, to slow or stop global warming? Someone do the math
All china has to do is go to a higher orbit than starlink and on the way up spit out a bunch of ball bearings at the same height star link is at every time they go up ...just a little bit more damage creating material every time. It's brutal but they won't have any problem with it.
What happened to Blue Origin......media doesn't even mention it
Wow
4000+🙄
where is blue origin ??
China is the winner of the space race.❤😊
God Bless America\SpaceX
They are going to have 5 customers, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Iran, North Korea.
Six including Mar-A-Lago.
learn to count please
I suppose African nations didn't figure in your tiny computer on top of your neck?
Include central asian and middle east countries and many countries from Africa.
The first statment is already so OUTDATED! So is wall street journal.
Literally US has more than 70% of world consumers/markets on its side and allies on its side. China as a single country is building to provide internet for its country is seen as a threat to the US.
Btw US is not a traditional country. Rather u can it is a amalgamation of whites/capitalists from europe and its allies. Lately people from Asia have also participated in this congregation.
1. It is also good and bad in a sense
Good as it provides concentrated focus for the people to build something,have opportunity/power that they didn't have in their home country.
2. Bad as it blocks innovation/collaboration as Only Sillicon valley ,wall street can't be the world centres. There comes a plateau and recession comes . As world dependent on US for innovation and economic output. But US can't keep that promise forever .
So in short we need globally distributed centre of finance and Tech . Built by people across the world. Not built by US and used by the world.
2:31 Micah! You sound like a Valley-Gurl with that vocal fry. You don't need to try that hard.
fancy wifi range extender basically lol
Elon vs China. Well, we know China will win. 😂
I think the sat.. fall and bang my head in future. 😮🛰☄️🪦
Xinhua cheque arrived at WSJ.
Sour grapes
liquid fuel rockets doesn't mean reusable many rockets use liquid fuel but they are not reusable
Isro silently making grounds
Racing towards full fledged Kessler Syndrome
SAVE FREEDOM 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
@0:01. _"...362 million people don't have internet in China..."_
You have got to be joking!! WSJ needs to do better research than this!
Just about EVERYONE in China has a smartphone. In fact, in the earlier days you can't even pay by cash in some shops. You need a phone to pay for items.
ALL smartphones in China can access the internet, EVEN in the middle of a desert!
Where do you get your stats from?
Could it be that 362 million people don't have a landline internet service? That is believable.
But that is NOT the same as saying 362 million people don't have internet.
Next part，Who will be the first to send a man to the moon?XD
usa ，China！NO ！it is Indian！😂
1:05 this fact needs to sink in - more than half of all satellites are SpaceX Starlink
all thanks to Elon Musk
Excuse me, where is NASA in this...?