Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile: 💥 con.onelink.me/kZW6/wcy3xpbf Receive 13K GOLD & 1 month premium subscription, only available for the next 30 days!
An interesting video and the technology on this station is impressive. But the fact that China doesn't care about strewing it's used rocket wreckage over foreign countries shows it's lack of respect for other nations.
Is there a game titled "Cooperation of Nations"? Would like my kids and grand kids to play that if it exists. If not, I found that Chinese checkers helped them learn how to cooperate with each other to reach their goals. Team sports also help. I grew up in China in the 1970s and remember watching documentary films at the movie theaters on the US and Soviet space accomplishments. Kids like me were just wowed and dreamed of 1 day being able to explore space also. During the 40+ years that I've lived in the US, I've visited China twice. The 1st time about 16 years ago and the 2nd time was just a few months ago this year. When I witnessed the amount of improvement on the standard of living with the next level technology and infrastructure accessible to the general public it felt like a dream. It's the same dreamlike feeling as when I watched the American and Soviet rockets blasted off into space over 40 years ago. Back then, we felt no fear or animosity towards the Americans nor the Soviets, I just find it so strange that here in the US, there is so much negativity towards China because of the fear mongering and fake news from our media and politicians. I hope more Americans can travel to China to see what's it's really like there and see that people there live just as happily as Americans, many of them probably happier. Peace😉.
You mentioned Taiwan towards the end of the video. Hope you will get to visit there and talk to different generations of people so that they can tell you in person their different versions of the history of what they officially call The Republic of China (ROC). ROC officially claims Mongolia in addition to all of the territorial land and waters that the People's Republic of China claims, which also includes the island of Taiwan as one of its provinces.
In 1960s China have no money and technology to do so. They launched their first very simple satellite in 1970. At that time USA have already reached moon.
CPC is accountable for everything, good or bad, and it bears the blunt or praises forever, unlike democratic countries where elected leaders only blame the other parties for committing bad things.
@@ex0duzz Correct, chemical has the Isp required for quick burns (as does cold gas), which shows the limitations of ion, which is both power hungry and low thrust.
THey also need to mention that the Chinese Space Station has a functional microwave oven. The other Space station does not. Sounds trivial but to have the voltage capacity for microwave oven is not easy.
I wonder if any more people saying its "made in China" comment here😂. One thing people forgot to think is, China capable of making quality products. Just dont pay cheap. You get what you paid for. You pay shit, you get shit 😂
No more "made in China" jokes to be made, almost everything that we have now have a component that is made in China from the cheapest to the most expensive stuff
To be fair, i grew up in an aerospace engineer family in China in 1960-1980s when my parents worked for a highly classified aerospace industry base, the west completely closed its door to Chinese aerospace industry, however chinese aerospace industry grew from zero to success. I remember when I was kid, I spent sometime at my dad s office, he did not have computer that time (1970s) , all he had is a lot pencils, and all sorts of blueprints he drew. Every time when new satellites or rockets were launched, my parents were really happy. I m very proud of my parents. Btw, china sent its first satellite to space in the early 1970 when china was completely isolated from outside world.
@@rustygates3367no，China and the Soviet Union fell out in the late 1950s, with the Soviet Union withdrawing all its experts and technical assistance, while China launched its first satellite in 1970
@@zzzz-sd1wr there are papers published on the scale of transfers through '48 to '66, its not a small amount. Yes, they cut ties off after that, but through the 90s and 2000s after the fall of USSR, the Russians sold alot of technology to China until Moscow clamped down on it in 2006.
@@DOSFS after the illegal dissolution of the ussr the new russian government was trynna lick the boots of the americans, at that time they were allies, well as much as any other subject of the american empire is its ally.
@@DOSFS Russia's existence is due to the fact that the basic cabin and technology of the International Space Station come from Russia, and the United States has long relied on Russian launch vehicles, so the United States cannot rule out Russia
China will definitely expand Tiangong because the components for expansion have actually been built. They are actually backups of the current space station, originally intended as replacements in case the first component failed. In fact, this is the tradition of CNSA. For example, China’s second artificial satellite is the backup of the first, the second lunar probe is the backup of the first, the second spacecraft is the backup of the first, etc.
They have an extra Tian He module already built and on standby when they launched the first one. It's only about when they refurbish that one and launch it.
This is by far the best detailed video, explaining the Chinese space station. Let alone Chinese pronunciations are correct in this video. The only thing missing in this video is Wentian module, which also serves as the backup platform of the core module with capability of space station control and management, has its own airlock served as main exit for spacewalking and a second robotic arm for the station, which can connect to the main robotic arm. Mengtian module has its own airlock for supplement and equipment transportation. Xuntian Telescope will be planned Chinese space station telescope currently under development. It will feature a 2-meter (6.6 foot) diameter primary mirror and is expected to have a field of view 300 times larger than the Hubble Space Telescope. This will allow the telescope to image up to 40 percent of the sky using its 2.5 gigapixel camera over ten years.
@ericliume........a lot of what this guy was saying is BS. Like for instance the ISS does have wireless for it's laptops and ipads but it's not for internet, it's for NASA communication networks including with other satellites.
The story of the Chinese space station illustrates that technological blockade is only effective against countries that lack scientific research foundation. For big countries, technological blockade can only have a short-term effect, because in the long term, technological blockade will increase the country's motivation to upgrade technology in disguise. Their original backward technology has no advantage compared with foreign countries. If it can be purchased, they usually will not choose to develop it themselves (economically uneconomical). However, after the technology blockade, the cost of purchasing advanced technology exceeds that of their own research and development. which will stimulate their home markets to upgrade technology. In other words, technological blockade makes their research and development cost-effective.
@@evrythingis1 Isnt everything in China a "national security concern" in us? Only place where you can live american dream is in china. China is like US but clean, safe & actually developed.
@@FemboyLegendGD You Wumao need to work on your technique. Does your boss know that you accidently make Chinese people seem belligerent? China is a country that is still learning how to use toilets, has polluted over 90% of their own ground water, has air pollution so bad from dirty coal plants that they are forced to only use EV's in some cities, and then they have the poor quality Chinese cars catching fire in the streets.
For example, China's Zhurong Mars rover is named after an ancient Chinese mythological figure. It is the Chinese God of Fire and taught humans how to use fire.
While China was sending the lander to the moon, the United States and its allies were sending their weapons to Ukraine and Israel. Then they say China has military aims!
So I guess all that expansion of their Army and Navy and seizure of the in the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea and their daily harassment shipping IN INTERNATIONAL WATERS of the South China Sea...that doesn't belong to them and never has and never will. Those islands are in the territorial waters of Vietnam and the Philippines. Also they daily threaten Taiwan. So YES they have military aims. And that includes the moon!!!
In the movie "2012", the state secretary of the US said " if you want to get something done, leave it to the Chinese". I know it's just a line from a movie, but still, that says something, eh?
And you forgot to mention that Chinese space station only costs about 8 billion dollars and ISS costs around 110 billion dollars and it’s was in the early 90s and early 2000s. Imagine how much more money would it be for NASA to build one today.
@@ghostmantagshome-er6pbyou have union labors, look those road constructors, two poor guys work and other eight just stand and watch them. And those are good guys since there are a lot of guys do nothing and just claim welfare or become homeless. And you can see military pay over thousand dollars for a office chair, that is why US government pay high price for everything. Dummy
It’s called Government over inflating the budget to fund the most money out of all the counties involved building the ISS. The amount spent does not mean the actual cost to build. A big portion of the money went towards launch and payload insurance. Do you know who sits on the board of those insurance companies? It’s not the Government, but money going into their pockets. So your comparison of cost doesn’t mean one is better than the other. It just means the American Government and people are corrupt.
You forgot to say that Chinese astronaut they can video call daily with theur families and when they have working at the space is on live in China TV's even in the children's school to show what they are doing at space.
Yes astronauts can use 5G technology to access the Internet, chat with their families and whtch TV shows, or they will be bored in their 6 month mission. They can watch live football matches as well, but unfortunately team China fails.
By the time 2026, when NASA finally landed on the moon, they will find a China Town on the dark side of the moon complete with Chinese takeaways, 5G network and Aliexpress
Yet the bullies are Chicoms and they're showing nothing about the station, except what they'll only allow us to see. Your argument doesn't make any sense.
@@texan-american200 Fucking hell Americans are propagandised. America has only been at peace for 17 years of its entire 247 year existence. China's last war was 45 years ago. America has had control over most international financial and monetary institutions since the end of the second world war which has allowed it to unilaterally sanction their political enemies and starve their civilian populations. The US has 800 military bases around the globe. China has 1. The US spends more on its military than the next 10 largest militaries in the world combined. Who's the real bully?
@@texan-american200 "they're showing nothing about the station, except what they'll only allow us to see." Agreed. It's naive for anyone to think China is providing real information about their stations. The flaws of the ISS are all on display. Flaws on China's station will be hidden from the world.
Except thats entirely wrong, but not your fault, the facts are never really mentioned. Check historical facts first. It was first and foremost a US space station, with added partners from the western world and Japan. Russia's involvement was post Soviet-collapse and a political move to stop the tech flowing to N.Korea, China (who barely had anything going at that stage, manned-wise) and Iran. The space stations first name was Freedom, then Alpha, to which the Russians objected, and ISS was the last name that everyone okayed on. China was never a partner and they only started going on the present program once they'd bought what they needed from Russia.
What’s interesting is that I usually notice a lot of people from the west be like “China didn’t build their technology! They stole it from us!”, trying to claim the credit for technology developed by China. I mean how can China steal something you don’t even have😂
If you have no shame, you are shaming yourself.. all parts from the China Space program and Chang'er 6 are made in China. Sanctions have no power. I hope to see America build a few satellites around the moon.
Except retirement of ISS keeps getting pushed back as more money is budgeted. It'll be like the B52 which was designed in the early 50's and is still the main bomber today.
The USA is planning to retire the ISS and replace it with a newer space station. Rather than an all-USA project it will involve participation for USA allies in its development, production, and transport of parts/assemblies into space (Japanese, Euro/ESA space rockets and private rockets like Space X's 'Falcon' plus rockets that a few other companies are developing).
@@r.i.t.randominterestingthi4031 Why dont you go live in china and tell us all how awful it is over there then mr. China is so great. I refuse to get near chinese infrastructure much less a space station made in china.
@@dragoncpu2226those 1.3 billion people are so miserable. I live in Seattle and all the heavy lifting machineries at the port are built, packaged, and shipped from China and assembled here. How miserable those workers are having to deal with Chinese crap equipments risking their lives all day just to get your Amazon package on time.
1:48 actually the ISS is indeed Mir 2.0. Did you know that the Russian segment modules (Zvezda in particular) were manufactured in 1985 as a component for the cancelled Mir-2 project. It was placed in storage in the Khrunichev factory until 1996, where it was refurbished and launched in 2000. Also the Shuttle-Mir program was considered the 1st phase in the ISS program.
Not only that, Soviets had a policy of doubling production - two of everything - in case of failure. If no failures they make it the next development, which is never very much: the scientists (at the time) always thought the one they worked on would be the last and it would be cancelled, so there wasn't much point. So Mir didn't fail, its backup became Mir-2, then Zvezda, and FGB backup became Nauka MLM. (Soon to be) ISS was actually about 5% Space Station Freedom before they included the Russians (With Soyuz as lifeboats, landing in Australia) - the Integrated Truss structure was all Freedom in 92 before they changed names circa 93.
perhaps some Russian modules can trace their lineage back to the ill-fated Mir-2 project, but most of ISS is much closer to Freedom. Sure, Mir-2 was supposed to have a truss section akin to that of ISS, but Russia never got there
@@thomasafb Actually, the truss is entirely Space Station Freedom - the design was developed 1991-1992 when they realised that the tinker-toy boom and the huge amount of EVA's required to build it were not going to happen. So ITS was already looking at fabrication by the time of ISS. Mir-2 had a type of truss, but most of its backbone was becoming the modules, as they found the same problems building in space as the US did (US tested deployment in 1986, Soviets had trusses erected on Salyut 7 and Mir, and everyone had trouble with them). Fair amount of paperwork available to see it all. So, yes, the ROS is all Mir-2 in pieces, and USOS is Space Station Freedom cut-down.
I came across a bunch of chinese comments bashing the ISS for being too old and outdated. It's unfortunate that they don't know that the ISS modules are already more than 2 decades old. Back then, even space station tech was largely unknown.
Well, whether in terms of internal volume, number of modules, scientific research capabilities, permanent personnel, or supply capabilities, the International Space Station is better than the Tiangong Space Station.
The Chinese are very practical and capable people. It’s sad that some people still look down on them. That’s what divisiveness brings to a country….total shame. Some of those still hope to divide China…lives in Taiwan.
@@jagery679Yea, all while copyright trolling and patent trolling every one. As they preached open markets and other blah blah nonsense to everyone else. They keep blaming others for doing what they themselves keep doing.
there are many plans for future stations supposed to be happening in the next few years and i for one am really exited about it. for far to long people have ignored space but finally we are increasing are presence out there and making meaningful plans to branch out. and i actually think the competition between countries might help because americans love to think there the best at everything and will move mountains to prove it
No mention of the downlink speed? the tiangong has a downlink of downlink rate is 1.2 Gbps whilst the ISS has a downlink of 100 Mbps. It's not that bad but certain experiments on the ISS save the real data on storage devices and brought back to earth to not interupt the flow of data Also you probably have noticed if ever theres a life broadcast from the ISS the quality can be iffy
your information seems somewhat outdated. the iss bandwidth was upgraded from 300 Mbps to 600 Mbps in 2019. additionally, i'd like to point out that it's a research facility and not a television studio, so video quality is not exactly a prime concern.
Having bandwidth and real time high quality video comms is good to have. Same as transferring any information at double the rate or more. It's like Bill Gates saying we only need 64K memory or whatever. Sure you can do things with 64K and even go to the moon with it but what you can do will ultimately be limited by your hardware limits. Same as you can do things with less power but you can obviously do even more with more power, and why they upgraded the bandwidth and the solar arrays and everything else they can. This is even more important when you can get more for less with newer tech and designs(ie more ability for less space/weight)
@@feignitclowns? Lol. More bandwidth is better, even if you never use it. One day you will. Compression is not ideal, and if you don't need it, it's better to not do compression since ultimately you will be giving up detail/quality and/or time due to your more limited bandwidth. You can also use compression with more bandwidth, there's literally zero downside. You can do twice as much in half the time. You could also do Morse code with 1kb to transfer information back doesn't change the fact that more bandwidth is better and will allow more data to be transfered which opens up possibilities that would otherwise be impossible. Like just say you saw a UFO, and now China can send highest quality video back to earth in real time while also maintaining live video conference calls with multiple people. So while you can only do one video call low quality, I could be transferring massive universe mapping data from xuntian space telescope(even if compressed, the universe is massive) and also high quality live streaming UFO and other members on board could also be doing live broadcasts and video calls with multiple sources, while another one is also having a break and watching high quality live stream if his favourite movies or talking to his family etc. Who knows. All you need to know is that more bandwidth is always better and you will find uses in the end. Even if it's not maxed out, it will still transfer faster. And that is always a good thing. Maybe you are one day in life and death situation and you need to transfer something quickly and also have high quality video stream the whole time. Maybe you have emergency medical issue and surgeon in earth needs live video feed and needs to operate remotely in the future. It's the same as saying we went to the moon with computer the size of a telephone booth and with processors less power than my calculator from 20 years ago. So why need more powerful or faster computer? Such flawed copium mentality. Lol. There's literally unlimited examples where faster is better. There's no situation where slower is better so i don't see what your even trying to argue about. Clowns. 🤣
Importantly, Apollo and astronauts got it from the moon decades ago.😊 NASA will do it again soon. Indians just did it unman, although Jews failed. go figure
And it will have the opposite effect that the commenters intended. Instead of seeing China for it's good and bad when younger people see disparaging comments like that they'll immediately see it as propaganda because people on TikTok don't talk like that.
What's interesting is , the module names of chinese space station comes from our ancient poetries and mythical legends. “tiangong” （天宫）means heaven or some place gods live there, it was first mentioned in a myth called (about AC 266-420). The space lab module “wentian” is from a poem written by "屈原" in BC 340-278， names “天问” （Asking to the sky）. Then the "meng tian" （梦天）means dreaming about sky(or may be cosmos), "tianzhou”（天舟） means sky boat driven by the gods, "tianqin" （天琴）means music from heaven, "tianhe”（天和）means we all stay harmonious in the sky (that's why he is the core module). I can't describe how beautiful those names are, those names carries our ambitious dream about the universe, and those dreams last for over 4000 years. And there's also something intresting, Most of chinese don't worship gods before Tang dynasty, they worship the "天” (the sky), they belive there's some super naturel power over there, so the chinese local religion Taoism worship the creator and world keeper "天". When we talking about the sky or the cosmos, every thing happend on the surface of this planet is insignificant, we humans will step out of this planet and even this solar system, it's the curiosity engraved in our genes, and the ultimate dreaming about the world.
How is that? All the molds etc will be hiding behind the walls where it will be hard to clean as well as repair if something breaks, like when a mircometeor hits.
It also slows access during critical times when trying to put out a fire when wires have shorted. That's one of the reasons so much was left exposed in international launches, so astronauts could quickly access and address problems. Looks clunky but it's functional.
@@tomwhone9804 Yeah. People (see: This video) get really carried away with things looking like an iPhone. Everyone has consumer brain - companies don't even want you to know how their stuff works, let alone be able to work on their products. Design requirements are different for professionals.
a little nitpick, the name "wentian" "问天" actually mean "ask the heaven" as if they asking or questioning, inquiring the heavy to learn its secrect, kind of poetic isn't it
those who advocated for legislation to prohibit china from participating in any projects related to the ISS must have mixed feelings now. "what does not kill me only makes me stronger" applies to china.
America never learns --- it was the space station, now it is 5G, 6G, semiconductors, NEVs, ai chips, quantum chips, renewable energy and more. China will dominate and then the U.S. will lose a big chunk of the global market.
Don't glorify the American model so much; it's outdated. look at human history over thousands of years - in times of war, does anyone care if it's military or civilian facilities? It's hypocritical protectionism and exclusivism.
@@diogocarvalho2934 Don't hype up the American model so much， it's merely a representation of a specific era. If you reflect on thousands of years of human history, during wartime, does anyone really care whether it's a military or civilian facility? It's such a hypocritical stance of protectionism and exclusivity.
On top of amazing technological advancement achieved by the Chinese space programme, the names they've given to each module and rockets is simply poetic; they're named after characters from Chinese folklores
@@不染铅华 Who said I'm worried? I will enjoy the shit show that China under the CCP is. What will crumble first - the three gorges dam, the financial system or the space station?
Please remind us all of the US national debt. Of course Ms Yellen says US can afford two simultaneous wars. Uhh, against who I wonder. The debt is big enough to worry the leading speakers for the Republican party when contemplating Biden's subsidies for Ukraine . It's frequently discussed in Congress. Prospects of a crumbling economy for USA ?? Lets see some balance and perspective in comments please.
The United States has therefore banned China from accessing the ISS, but wishes to carry out missions on the Chinese Space Station... Banning your opponents is the best way to boost their development... 'Keep your friends close but your enemies closer' Sun Tzu in The Art of War
The ISS is a hybrid between the planned Soviet Mir-2 and the US Freedom space station. That is why there is a distinct "Russian Orbital Segment" and a distinct "United States Orbital Segment." Pressurized Mating Adapter 1 (PMA-1) connects the US Node-1 "Unity" module to the Russian "Zarya" module which was the core of Mir-2. Russian modules are attached to Zarya, while American, ESA, Italian, and Japanese modules are attached to the US Unity and Harmony nodes. The US nodes, along with the ESA, Italian, and Japanese nodes, were all intended for Space Station Freedom. The ISS shares the "Integrated Truss Structure" planned for Space Station Freedom. The ISS is a chimera of Mir-2 and Freedom. To suggest it is simply an evolution of Mir is technically and historically incorrect. Also, China's Tiangong space station's Tianhe module heavily leverages the Russian Zarya module design, and its Wentian module heavily leverages the Russian Zvezda module design. Also, China's Shenzhou spacecraft is effectively a scaled up Soyuz. Design-wise, Tiangong is just as much an evolution of Mir as the Russian Orbital Segment of the ISS. The cleaner interior of Tiangong is likely due to the fact it has not been continuously occupied for decades, like the ISS. Constant additions of experiments, equipment, etc. have caused more equipment to be attached, and more power and data cables to be extended. Photos from the early ISS expeditions show a much less cluttered interior.
Needs an edit: There were two development leads here: Zarya was an FGB block, originally planned for Mir, not Mir-2, and history put paid to its use; Zvezda was originally earmarked for Mir-2, and as such was built in the mid 1980s. FGB's were just modules never cores, just a development from TKS, from when it competed with the Soyuz design. There was some infighting on the Russian side which led to the FGB inclusion, otherwise it would have developed without it. Crucially, the extended modules of Tiangong and Tianzhou, are essentially the projects that Russia could not afford to build - the science modules are from Russias science & power module development and Tianzhou is the extended Progress path. Japanese module Kibo was the largest module on the ISS and when you see it after installation it looked incredibly spacious, as do all things when we first first move into them. Due to historical events, both SSF and Mir-2 looked in danger of never happening, but, mainly for political reasons, they ended up saving each other, whilst adding a bridging space station between the two: the Shuttle-Mir program, the importance of which cannot be overlooked.
Westerners: China stole European and American “space station” technology.😈 ：But Europe and the United States have not built their own space stations.😮 Westerners: This is not the point. What we are concerned about is that the Chinese stole our space station technology.🤡
At 14.45 you say that the module generates 7kW. This feels wrong. I think this array is around 200 squares metres. The best panels in space will probably generate about 300W per square metre. That works out around 60kW. I am estimating some of this but cannot belive these panels only generate 7kW.
Hi, below info is from an Chinese article. It says the area of the solar panel on Tianhe core module is 134 square metres with output greater than 18kW. Together with solar panels on Wentian and Mengtian expansion modules, the total output is expected to be more than 90 kW. This is roughly 80% of power output when compared to the ISS. The article also mentioned that the energy conversion efficiency of the solar panels is 30% compares to the 18% for the ISS. I dont know how accurate this is though, hope it makes sense.
The Soviet Union had a great influence on the new China. Like a teacher, the Soviet Union helped establish the industrial base. Later, the United States became New China's business partner and developed economic and trade. China is good at learning from the strongest countries and absorbing the parts that are beneficial to itself.
There is a pretty clear and huge leap in Space Station design going from Skylab to Mir. The change from monolithic to modular is the most significant change is station design so far.
I find it interesting how this creator has shown Skylab in multiple videos as if it were made from the S2 Stage 2 stage of the Saturn 5 instead from the S4B Third stage from which it was actually made. The S4B stage is 22 feet in diameter and the S2 stage was 33 feet in diameter. 11 extra feet wide would have been awesome but unfortunately was not the case. Enjoy what you are doing. keep trying and shoot for a little better accuracy. I was only 6 at the time Skylab flew but there are those here that weren't her at all when Skylab flew. Cheers.
Yes, it's at about the one-minute mark. "The Space Race" seems generally an insightful YT channel- maybe the graphics person screwed that up. Still it should have been caught. It looks ridiculous.
Current Situation in dialogues: 1 Americans: No Space Stations! 1 Chinese: Understood. Developing Space Stations. Tiangong go live in 5 years! 2 Americans: No Chips! 2 Chinese: Understood. Developing Chips. Kirin Chipsets go live in 2 years! 3 American: ... 3 Chinese: hey, what's up? why are you weird? What's next? 4 American: ............
I would really like to see China build a space station like that seen in Stanley Kubrick's "2001 - A Space Odyssey" which will really shake things up. The current space stations are really just reiterations of past "clip-on" booster rocket segment versions.
China is moving forward in a rapid pace, its as if they think 20 years ahead of everyone nowadays, and they complete stuff so quick! Made in China started as a meme and ended with a WIN!
It's hilarious that you think propaganda designed for internal use on illiterate Chinese citizens will ever change how the world views the China. In the west, China is the same as Africa. it's where we go for slaves, that is all they are good for.
The functioning of LM-5B is not really original. This was used for the Space shuttle and Ariane-5 and in fact the Soyouz launcher use it also. It is sometime called one stage and half.
Long march is an amazing name for a space rocket. Liked it since i read near-future sci-fi 20+ years ago. China's predicted space industry growth often played key roles in many world saving projects in those books.
Yeah, unfortunately NASA and Canada didn't make as much noise about it as the Chinese, and now they're drowned out by the false claims of Chinese do everything first, and better. *sigh* Chinese refuse to hear that they are not first.
@@naokiokusa5578 "Unlike the original Canadarm, Canadarm2 is not permanently anchored by one of its ends. Both ends have a locking effector (LEE) that can be used as an anchor point while the opposite end performs various tasks, including gripping an electromechanical terminal (PDGF) on the Station. This concept allows Canadarm2 to move around the Station like a spanner caterpillar, by fixing its ends in turn to the electromechanical terminals (PDGF) distributed at various points on the exterior walls of the Station." And it did so already back in 2001.
*UNLIMITED SOCIAL CREDIT* EDIT made this comment as a joke, but I sorted by new and holy shit some of of you are not capable of independent thought. "Hey guys did you know China has a space station?" - "HOW MUCH DID THEY PAY YOU!"
i just love how any shape or module alignment works in space. nothing has to be streamlined. you're limited by your imagination and necessities to complete your space experimentation and or missions. would be cool if they invented the first space nuclear reactor
Tiangong is essentially Mir but modernised. Its still a radial modular station, using a core module that others are attached to. ISS is a true modular station with separate pressurised modules connected in chain with multiple nodes, and a separate truss for solar panels and cooling. Tiangong has integrated solar and cooling. You mention the ISS has bottlenecks, I'd argue that Tiangong is the station that exhibits bottlenecks as it has a central point where all modules connect. This also doubles as the airlock, limiting access to other sections when a spacewalk is in progress
Its likely that all these projects respect launch constraints. Cylindrical units sized to the diameters of the rockets. It would be nice to build something more interesting but maybe utility rules apply. The Swiss Chalet style will have to wait. Its likely UTube critics are not engineers but Star Wars addicts.
In technology terms, 20 + years is a very long time, so it shouldn’t be a surprise. Unlike the ISS modules which had to have backwards compatibility to older designs, multiple standards and runs on a lot of tech that goes back to well before smartphones. It was also mostly designed to be transported by space shuttle, limiting dimensions and weight and the differing needs of the international modules and purposes. It was a set of pragmatic decisions based on what was practical given the limitations above. China didn’t have to worry about any of that which was a huge advantage, along with newer technology to play with as well as tons of knowledge gained from all the existing space programs from the US, Russia and Europe. It also didn’t have to worry about congress dicking around with funding and endless committees.
Thanks for the video, really interesting and best of luck to China on future modules for their space station....this is really cool...I think the US regrets their law preventing them from going on the Chinese space station as the ISS is on it's last space endeavours...
Thanks for the information, one note for improvement: please do not use this flickering effect (like here 10:55, and here 11:15), your video is very peacefully paced, these transitions may be annoying to viewers. Thanks in advance.
Once they begin to extract scarce industrial resources from space, these stations will adapt to become the platforms we see in the High Frontier and 2001
Thanks for the video summary. It is also interesting that the TianHe Core Module carries a set of Hall Effect Thrusters that can help to maintain orbit height. However it is not clear how effective it actually is.
@@luutuan7162 My 'statement' is a sarcastic comment against the ISS and a praise to Tiangong! You need to improve your English comprehension! In sarcasm, there is no need for details and it's not a matter of like or dislike. How old are you? you sound like you're a 12 year-old wanting to be a 22 year-old!
Smart Chinese ! There space station is 100% made by and invented by Chinese. Same for their global positioning system, up to 1 meter accurancy. They even invented their own atomic clock all by themselves. Amazing achievements by one country.
The stations modules are entirely based on Soviet DOS and OPS modules. It's not something they invented at all. Just something they bought in the 90's and 00's from Russia.
@@VG_164 China also bought a very stripped hulk carrier ship from Ukrain in late 90's, now they are making their own 4th carrier with nuclear power. China is able to significantlly & quickly improve/re-invent it from the old tech. The west slows down a lot in renovation because they are too self competence now. How long can they live with their old patents ?
This Chinese space-station is heavily influenced by Russia, clean(bacteria-free), Station MIR was retired after human bacteria mutated and began to eat rubber and metals, Russian designed Mir 2(ISS) which does away with these problems, Russia's new station ROSS its NEM-1 core completed will operate in a higher orbit.
20 years difference in technology is a big difference!! We can't speak of it like it isn't. Just compare the cellphones of 2004 with the phones we have today!
Sometimes I wonder if we need a completely new and separate nation that anyone around the world can join, with the intent to improve human capabilities without political intervention.
@@zander_the_space_nerd While made in China is cheap.😊Made in USA, Bentley, Rolls Royce, 007 drives American made Aston Martin, Bugatti, Mercedes Benz, BMW, Porsche, Ferrari, Lamborghini, just to name a few. Hope I made you happy.
"like a Mir version 2.0".... thats because the ISS is... The core of the ISS is Mir 2.0 Zarya and Zvezda modules were supposed to be a Mir 1/2 modules and were used as the core of the the ISS. To this day the Russian modules on the ISS are the main/first modules on the ISS eg Zvezda life support systems.
I get why America would block China but not Russia (while wasting hundreds of billions to Ukraine) from the ISS, but the reasons are so silly and annoying.
It's cause Russians plaay a key role in still running the ISS along with contingencies, I've always thought Space ought to bypass politics down on the ground if possible and serves as a means of reconciliation and what we can do together
I mean if you take Chinese grammar into account than then names should be closer to ‘to dream about space' and 'to ask about space/ knock on the heaven for answers'
@@Andrew_ATC I would argur that since 梦 is used in the front, it serves as a verb here. And i do believe that 巡 is generally used to mean patrol/search, espacially when it's not being paired with other words. Other than that, I do find your translation sharp and clean, good job.
@@chenkunnie Thanks, 😃. I chose "Gazers" because "天巡" is a telescope, if I remember right. "巡", in this context, means to scan the space. Chinese is a very compact language so the literal translation into English can often be too wordy. Adaptation is necessary to make the end product sound nice in the target language. If I were to name the modules in English, I would drop "in Heaven" and make them simply Dreamer, Inquirer, Gazer, and Peace/Harmony. IMHO.
@@Andrew_ATC One thing that I hate about the English language is that new words always need to be created in order to express precise meanings. Now this huge vocabulary has exceeded one million words, and I can't even imagine how many words there will be in 100 years.
1. The Long March is the 4th most powerful rocket behind NASA's Space Launch System, the Falcon Heavy, and the Delta IV Heavy. I'm a little surprised you didn't know that. The SLS launch was a pretty big deal. 2. Regarding the arm, matching the size is not the same as matching capability. There are many factors to consider, and an extra joint is a weak point. We don't know the exact capabilities of the combined arm(s), but it's safe to say that it doesn't quite have the same strength as Canadarm 2 (let alone 3, under construction for the Lunar Gateway). 3. Nothing about this space station, as you have described it, is a reinvention. It is a very respectable achievement, certainly, but it is essentially a copy of existing technologies. They have done excellent work in other domains, however.
Similarly, this mechanical arm is only the first generation, and the second generation will be online soon. But also can be directly installed, which is very convenient to operate.
Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile: 💥 con.onelink.me/kZW6/wcy3xpbf Receive 13K GOLD & 1 month premium subscription, only available for the next 30 days!
I love China, I've lived and worked there, but please catch a but of _The China Show_ to see what is happening on the ground today.
An interesting video and the technology on this station is impressive. But the fact that China doesn't care about strewing it's used rocket wreckage over foreign countries shows it's lack of respect for other nations.
Is there a game titled "Cooperation of Nations"? Would like my kids and grand kids to play that if it exists. If not, I found that Chinese checkers helped them learn how to cooperate with each other to reach their goals. Team sports also help. I grew up in China in the 1970s and remember watching documentary films at the movie theaters on the US and Soviet space accomplishments. Kids like me were just wowed and dreamed of 1 day being able to explore space also. During the 40+ years that I've lived in the US, I've visited China twice. The 1st time about 16 years ago and the 2nd time was just a few months ago this year. When I witnessed the amount of improvement on the standard of living with the next level technology and infrastructure accessible to the general public it felt like a dream. It's the same dreamlike feeling as when I watched the American and Soviet rockets blasted off into space over 40 years ago. Back then, we felt no fear or animosity towards the Americans nor the Soviets, I just find it so strange that here in the US, there is so much negativity towards China because of the fear mongering and fake news from our media and politicians. I hope more Americans can travel to China to see what's it's really like there and see that people there live just as happily as Americans, many of them probably happier. Peace😉.
You mentioned Taiwan towards the end of the video. Hope you will get to visit there and talk to different generations of people so that they can tell you in person their different versions of the history of what they officially call The Republic of China (ROC). ROC officially claims Mongolia in addition to all of the territorial land and waters that the People's Republic of China claims, which also includes the island of Taiwan as one of its provinces.
🛰
On China side, there is no space race like in 1960s, it is just progressing its space exploration program based on road map set 15-20 years ago =)
In 1960s China have no money and technology to do so. They launched their first very simple satellite in 1970. At that time USA have already reached moon.
i want to post a newpaper 😅
CPC is accountable for everything, good or bad, and it bears the blunt or praises forever, unlike democratic countries where elected leaders only blame the other parties for committing bad things.
yeah and the budget is very very low compared to gdp of china.
There *should* be space race, in my opinion. The competition gave humanity so many good technologies
I think the only thing you didn’t mention is that it’s propulsion is based on ion propulsion not chemical. Much more efficient to boost orbit.
It has both ion thruster and traditional chemical. They need chemical to dodge space X satellites lol
@@ex0duzz Correct, chemical has the Isp required for quick burns (as does cold gas), which shows the limitations of ion, which is both power hungry and low thrust.
THey also need to mention that the Chinese Space Station has a functional microwave oven. The other Space station does not. Sounds trivial but to have the voltage capacity for microwave oven is not easy.
請問~你對美國宇航員不是一次破壞國際太空站有什麼看法？
@@fredh8065 What makes you think that exactly?
I wonder if any more people saying its "made in China" comment here😂. One thing people forgot to think is, China capable of making quality products. Just dont pay cheap. You get what you paid for. You pay shit, you get shit 😂
😂😂😂
No more "made in China" jokes to be made, almost everything that we have now have a component that is made in China from the cheapest to the most expensive stuff
😂
@@matony189 nice! at last some one said out my heart voice!!!!!!!! I am not very educated , let me thank you with a simple 牛逼！！！！！！
no but international corporation pay shit in china, and sell the end product to their U.S. customers at rip-off price
To be fair, i grew up in an aerospace engineer family in China in 1960-1980s when my parents worked for a highly classified aerospace industry base, the west completely closed its door to Chinese aerospace industry, however chinese aerospace industry grew from zero to success. I remember when I was kid, I spent sometime at my dad s office, he did not have computer that time (1970s) , all he had is a lot pencils, and all sorts of blueprints he drew. Every time when new satellites or rockets were launched, my parents were really happy. I m very proud of my parents. Btw, china sent its first satellite to space in the early 1970 when china was completely isolated from outside world.
🎉🎉
反华者们根本不了解中国的近现代历史背景，明明自己的国家出了大问题，还在洋洋得意，真是无奈又好笑
There was a LOT of space technology transfer from the Soviets. It was never 'zero' to begin with.
@@rustygates3367no，China and the Soviet Union fell out in the late 1950s, with the Soviet Union withdrawing all its experts and technical assistance, while China launched its first satellite in 1970
@@zzzz-sd1wr there are papers published on the scale of transfers through '48 to '66, its not a small amount. Yes, they cut ties off after that, but through the 90s and 2000s after the fall of USSR, the Russians sold alot of technology to China until Moscow clamped down on it in 2006.
To the United States the word international means national plus allies
It's typical Westoid settler-regime insecurity where the thief thinks everyone else is a thief!
Allies that don't imprison and organ harvest any and all live prisoners deemed a threat to the CCP.
Russia : What?
@@DOSFS after the illegal dissolution of the ussr the new russian government was trynna lick the boots of the americans, at that time they were allies, well as much as any other subject of the american empire is its ally.
@@DOSFS Russia's existence is due to the fact that the basic cabin and technology of the International Space Station come from Russia, and the United States has long relied on Russian launch vehicles, so the United States cannot rule out Russia
China will definitely expand Tiangong because the components for expansion have actually been built. They are actually backups of the current space station, originally intended as replacements in case the first component failed. In fact, this is the tradition of CNSA. For example, China’s second artificial satellite is the backup of the first, the second lunar probe is the backup of the first, the second spacecraft is the backup of the first, etc.
Its actually very clever. Sadly they don't seem to do this when it comes to missions to Mars, and the upcoming missions to Jupiter, Venus etc.
@@aprilpower1158每个任务都有，但有的任务成本太高，不能在重复发射一次
@@aprilpower1158we shall wait and see, they’re taking their time on this
They have an extra Tian He module already built and on standby when they launched the first one. It's only about when they refurbish that one and launch it.
@@leonzspotg They would have given out information by now if they planned to make 2 Venus probes and 2 Mars sample return crafts.
This is by far the best detailed video, explaining the Chinese space station. Let alone Chinese pronunciations are correct in this video. The only thing missing in this video is Wentian module, which also serves as the backup platform of the core module with capability of space station control and management, has its own airlock served as main exit for spacewalking and a second robotic arm for the station, which can connect to the main robotic arm. Mengtian module has its own airlock for supplement and equipment transportation. Xuntian Telescope will be planned Chinese space station telescope currently under development. It will feature a 2-meter (6.6 foot) diameter primary mirror and is expected to have a field of view 300 times larger than the Hubble Space Telescope. This will allow the telescope to image up to 40 percent of the sky using its 2.5 gigapixel camera over ten years.
这颗太空望远镜还可以从空间站分离并伴飞
the Hubble space telescope was launched over 30 years ago…
@@yessir7147 Yeah, but "Nokia" already died🤣
Isnt this a chinese yt?
@ericliume........a lot of what this guy was saying is BS. Like for instance the ISS does have wireless for it's laptops and ipads but it's not for internet, it's for NASA communication networks including with other satellites.
The story of the Chinese space station illustrates that technological blockade is only effective against countries that lack scientific research foundation. For big countries, technological blockade can only have a short-term effect, because in the long term, technological blockade will increase the country's motivation to upgrade technology in disguise. Their original backward technology has no advantage compared with foreign countries. If it can be purchased, they usually will not choose to develop it themselves (economically uneconomical). However, after the technology blockade, the cost of purchasing advanced technology exceeds that of their own research and development. which will stimulate their home markets to upgrade technology. In other words, technological blockade makes their research and development cost-effective.
Yeah, but that would only be true if they were capable of research and development, LOL
@@evrythingis1 Isnt everything in China a "national security concern" in us? Only place where you can live american dream is in china. China is like US but clean, safe & actually developed.
@@FemboyLegendGD You Wumao need to work on your technique. Does your boss know that you accidently make Chinese people seem belligerent? China is a country that is still learning how to use toilets, has polluted over 90% of their own ground water, has air pollution so bad from dirty coal plants that they are forced to only use EV's in some cities, and then they have the poor quality Chinese cars catching fire in the streets.
@@FemboyLegendGD 并不，我们只是一个发展中国家，美国有很多值得学习的地方。妄自尊大、闭门造车是不行的。
简单来说就是研究所可以更容易向政府要到资金。对于大国来说科技能力几乎等同于投入资金的大小。只不过技术封锁会让被封锁国家花更多的钱
Love how the Chinese gave their space station such a mythic vibe with mythical names " Heavenly Palace," "Heavenly Quest".
Sounds like those cruise ships naming.
The names come from a well-known fairy tale in China.😊
@@lanbo316 Oh, that's nice
All of the Chinese space vehicles are named after mythical stories in their history.
For example, China's Zhurong Mars rover is named after an ancient Chinese mythological figure. It is the Chinese God of Fire and taught humans how to use fire.
While China was sending the lander to the moon, the United States and its allies were sending their weapons to Ukraine and Israel. Then they say China has military aims!
美国有量子卫星吗？美国有超级电脑吗？没有有5g...6g系统吗？美国有新能源汽车吗？美国有独立自主的宇宙空间站吗？美国高超音速飞弹吗？美国有领先全球的无人机吗？？美国能造出领先全球的全电系统航空母舰吗？美国的电磁大炮能装军舰吗？美国可以打无人机的激光系统吗？。。。很显然没有都没用，那是因为我们偷了美国未来的技术！所以现在美国没有了！哈哈哈。。。
美国只害怕别人超越他，只会耍手段加害超越他的国家
The West is owned by Zionists
Don't know why the mentality of America/Europe is always aggression, violence and war. They're so preoccupied with such thoughts
So I guess all that expansion of their Army and Navy and seizure of the in the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea and their daily harassment shipping IN INTERNATIONAL WATERS of the South China Sea...that doesn't belong to them and never has and never will. Those islands are in the territorial waters of Vietnam and the Philippines. Also they daily threaten Taiwan. So YES they have military aims. And that includes the moon!!!
it's like comparing the NYC subway with the Shanghai subway
you can compare any european subway with NYC and still NYC is garbage lol. nothing about the US subway system is good
I didn't dare to take the NYC subway when I visited NYC several years ago, because I didn't want to be pushed onto the rails.
@@amaoseu lmao xD
🤣😂🤣😂
Indeed. The NY Subway has worked well for over 100 years.
It remains to be seen if communist China can build ANYTHING that lasts that long.
In the movie "2012", the state secretary of the US said " if you want to get something done, leave it to the Chinese". I know it's just a line from a movie, but still, that says something, eh?
It's not a random line, it was based on reality, Chinese are doing things since ever, it's a millennial civilization for a reason.
我们竟然同名^_^
@Painkiller-h5g 确实太少见了😂
I remember this
it is simple, the Chinese space station grow like this: 1. 上，2. 工，3. 土，4. 王，5. 田，6，囍
😅
😂😂😂
final form 魑魅魍魉
@@andyliu7922 final final form 龘龘龘龘
@@leezhieng lol what is this character, dragons on top of each other?
And you forgot to mention that Chinese space station only costs about 8 billion dollars and ISS costs around 110 billion dollars and it’s was in the early 90s and early 2000s. Imagine how much more money would it be for NASA to build one today.
@@ghostmantagshome-er6pb lol, repeating the same rhetoric from the MSM
@@ghostmantagshome-er6pbyou have union labors, look those road constructors, two poor guys work and other eight just stand and watch them. And those are good guys since there are a lot of guys do nothing and just claim welfare or become homeless. And you can see military pay over thousand dollars for a office chair, that is why US government pay high price for everything. Dummy
@@ghostmantagshome-er6pb Turn your brain on,Slaves can't build a space station.
It’s called Government over inflating the budget to fund the most money out of all the counties involved building the ISS. The amount spent does not mean the actual cost to build. A big portion of the money went towards launch and payload insurance. Do you know who sits on the board of those insurance companies? It’s not the Government, but money going into their pockets. So your comparison of cost doesn’t mean one is better than the other. It just means the American Government and people are corrupt.
@@ghostmantagshome-er6pbyeah slave labors make the best space station.😂😂
You forgot to say that Chinese astronaut they can video call daily with theur families and when they have working at the space is on live in China TV's even in the children's school to show what they are doing at space.
Yes astronauts can use 5G technology to access the Internet, chat with their families and whtch TV shows, or they will be bored in their 6 month mission. They can watch live football matches as well, but unfortunately team China fails.
@@amaoseu😂😂😅
@@amaoseu我喜欢你的幽默😂😂😂
@@风大-可稍息否 哈哈哈
@@amaoseu humorous guy
I don't like our football team either
By the time 2026, when NASA finally landed on the moon, they will find a China Town on the dark side of the moon complete with Chinese takeaways, 5G network and Aliexpress
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
美国人在那里找不到自己的国旗，因为他们擅长作弊
人才
The moon don't have a dark side. It a far side, which is equally lit the side we see.
lol😂
China: "Okay, then we'll just do it ourselves, and do it better."
America: wait that wasn't the goal thou-
China: "Too late."
Sure, go along with that farcical thought.
Better, LOL!
@@texan-american200someone hurt the American didn’t they
@@texan-american200I know. Truth hurt your anal
@@NewTrip_NewAdventure i am waiting for the next chinese that will call you a racist for calling them copy cats...
this is like when some kid try to join project with Bullies but got rejected then that kid try make their own better than Bullies
Yet the bullies are Chicoms and they're showing nothing about the station, except what they'll only allow us to see. Your argument doesn't make any sense.
@@texan-american200 Fucking hell Americans are propagandised. America has only been at peace for 17 years of its entire 247 year existence. China's last war was 45 years ago. America has had control over most international financial and monetary institutions since the end of the second world war which has allowed it to unilaterally sanction their political enemies and starve their civilian populations. The US has 800 military bases around the globe. China has 1. The US spends more on its military than the next 10 largest militaries in the world combined. Who's the real bully?
@@texan-american200 "they're showing nothing about the station, except what they'll only allow us to see."
Agreed. It's naive for anyone to think China is providing real information about their stations. The flaws of the ISS are all on display. Flaws on China's station will be hidden from the world.
Except thats entirely wrong, but not your fault, the facts are never really mentioned. Check historical facts first. It was first and foremost a US space station, with added partners from the western world and Japan. Russia's involvement was post Soviet-collapse and a political move to stop the tech flowing to N.Korea, China (who barely had anything going at that stage, manned-wise) and Iran. The space stations first name was Freedom, then Alpha, to which the Russians objected, and ISS was the last name that everyone okayed on. China was never a partner and they only started going on the present program once they'd bought what they needed from Russia.
When you get bullied because of your persecution of ethnic minorities.
US : we ban china to enter ISS
China : okay, we just make a better space station !
ong ! frfr ! no cap !
@@ah11980 Is Porsche 911 a copy from VW beetles?
@@ah11980 “We lied, We cheated, We stole” - Mike Pompeo
@@ah11980 Fine, tired of your westners' nonsenses with no facts supported. Keep living in your fantasies.
@@ah11980😁
China asked NASA, EU (& Russia) politely but was refused. OK, DIY and done better than anyone else ever, period.
Now get used to it.
Well done China.❤
@@raymondthom1699 People only give that heart of yours to China because they succeeded.
They did not refused.
@astronotics531 whatever, it's too late to regret
@astronotics531 are you sure? not refused? then rejected?
What’s interesting is that I usually notice a lot of people from the west be like “China didn’t build their technology! They stole it from us!”, trying to claim the credit for technology developed by China. I mean how can China steal something you don’t even have😂
If you have no shame, you are shaming yourself.. all parts from the China Space program and Chang'er 6 are made in China. Sanctions have no power. I hope to see America build a few satellites around the moon.
The Chinese stole our time machine to steal our yet to be invented tech is the only logical explanation. Someone need to make a movie about that. lol
If you keep on saying this, your children is falling behind.
Like what? What does China have that the west doesn't?
因为他们被youtube上的一些片面和肤浅的信息洗脑了，形成了一套错误的逻辑推导理论体系，然后就来不懂装懂
The thing about CSS is all them modules are replacable with new module so the whole space station won't retire like ISS.
It is because of modular construction that CSS is capable of expanding to a larger size in the future.
Except retirement of ISS keeps getting pushed back as more money is budgeted. It'll be like the B52 which was designed in the early 50's and is still the main bomber today.
@@ChatGPT1111 wars and displacing brown people comes first, space exploration needs to wait
@@ChatGPT1111Patch it and then use it.😂
The USA is planning to retire the ISS and replace it with a newer space station. Rather than an all-USA project it will involve participation for USA allies in its development, production, and transport of parts/assemblies into space (Japanese, Euro/ESA space rockets and private rockets like Space X's 'Falcon' plus rockets that a few other companies are developing).
Good video, and nice to see a western channel who do not just do china bashing, but show the actual things.
Time is changing
@@Blue-b3f1u some people refused to change apparently. going as far as hating over nothing
@@Blue-b3f1u nope just independent jounalist hobbiests
@@r.i.t.randominterestingthi4031 Why dont you go live in china and tell us all how awful it is over there then mr. China is so great. I refuse to get near chinese infrastructure much less a space station made in china.
@@dragoncpu2226those 1.3 billion people are so miserable. I live in Seattle and all the heavy lifting machineries at the port are built, packaged, and shipped from China and assembled here. How miserable those workers are having to deal with Chinese crap equipments risking their lives all day just to get your Amazon package on time.
Желаю удачи китайским товарищам!
俄罗斯同志一起共同发展！
俄罗斯人在太空是无敌的！--来自《流浪地球2》
谢谢，俄国同志
世界人民大团结万岁！感谢来自俄罗斯的同志，乌拉！
thanks
Thanks
ISS: We are on a collision course please change your trajectory!
Tiangong: Meow
Russian section: Ima outta here
1:48 actually the ISS is indeed Mir 2.0. Did you know that the Russian segment modules (Zvezda in particular) were manufactured in 1985 as a component for the cancelled Mir-2 project. It was placed in storage in the Khrunichev factory until 1996, where it was refurbished and launched in 2000. Also the Shuttle-Mir program was considered the 1st phase in the ISS program.
The U.S. segment is the old Space Station Freedom plans.
Not only that, Soviets had a policy of doubling production - two of everything - in case of failure. If no failures they make it the next development, which is never very much: the scientists (at the time) always thought the one they worked on would be the last and it would be cancelled, so there wasn't much point. So Mir didn't fail, its backup became Mir-2, then Zvezda, and FGB backup became Nauka MLM. (Soon to be) ISS was actually about 5% Space Station Freedom before they included the Russians (With Soyuz as lifeboats, landing in Australia) - the Integrated Truss structure was all Freedom in 92 before they changed names circa 93.
perhaps some Russian modules can trace their lineage back to the ill-fated Mir-2 project, but most of ISS is much closer to Freedom. Sure, Mir-2 was supposed to have a truss section akin to that of ISS, but Russia never got there
@@thomasafb Actually, the truss is entirely Space Station Freedom - the design was developed 1991-1992 when they realised that the tinker-toy boom and the huge amount of EVA's required to build it were not going to happen. So ITS was already looking at fabrication by the time of ISS. Mir-2 had a type of truss, but most of its backbone was becoming the modules, as they found the same problems building in space as the US did (US tested deployment in 1986, Soviets had trusses erected on Salyut 7 and Mir, and everyone had trouble with them). Fair amount of paperwork available to see it all. So, yes, the ROS is all Mir-2 in pieces, and USOS is Space Station Freedom cut-down.
I came across a bunch of chinese comments bashing the ISS for being too old and outdated. It's unfortunate that they don't know that the ISS modules are already more than 2 decades old. Back then, even space station tech was largely unknown.
China: We have a space party, guess who's not invited?
Wby not ? Asia has so much to teach the west
I am Ireland. Can we join please, lots of young students need to hear from you in PRC China ?
@@causewaykayak好像是可以的，美国是不行的。中国空间站全部是中文系统和标识，所以外国宇航员先要学习中文
@@weno6747 that makes sense, its a Chinese space station after all.
@@causewaykayak ESA and JAXA have already signed partnerships with the Chinese space program. You can join as long as you are not american
The Americans said the Chinese can't join the ISS, so China made a better one.
truly
Well, whether in terms of internal volume, number of modules, scientific research capabilities, permanent personnel, or supply capabilities, the International Space Station is better than the Tiangong Space Station.
@lengchenwu9471 Lol, have you been to both of them? Don't be like a child and tell others that the toys you like are better.
@@Athedgewu 傻逼。
@@Athedgewu 可怜的中国台湾省司马键种😂
Go, China, go go go go !!!
谢谢😊
谢谢你介绍中国的空间站。每一次美国禁止中国的某样东西。就迫使中国自己研发自己的东西。
Prohibition will only make people surpass It won't work
Ok COVID hakka noodles Chinese bots 😂😂
@@Robert_austia yeah, every chinese is a bot.
@@iyi3305 ohh COVID hakka noodles Chinese bots activated
@@Robert_austia right right right,you are right😂
The Chinese are very practical and capable people. It’s sad that some people still look down on them. That’s what divisiveness brings to a country….total shame. Some of those still hope to divide China…lives in Taiwan.
@AlbionOnline-nz2xbyou just stated exactly what America did to the rest of the world lol
❤
Good CCP bot.
@@tomphann1903good cia bot
@@jagery679Yea, all while copyright trolling and patent trolling every one. As they preached open markets and other blah blah nonsense to everyone else. They keep blaming others for doing what they themselves keep doing.
Sounds to me the biggest challenges in space travel aren't in space but right down here on earth in the rooms and halls of our government buildings.
there are many plans for future stations supposed to be happening in the next few years and i for one am really exited about it. for far to long people have ignored space but finally we are increasing are presence out there and making meaningful plans to branch out. and i actually think the competition between countries might help because americans love to think there the best at everything and will move mountains to prove it
In order to do that, the US must let go of the war machine, good luck!
That's a much better place to compete, rather than trade war or hot war.
americans think there are the best at everything, china thinks they can prove otherwise....the latter is usually not true.
No mention of the downlink speed? the tiangong has a downlink of downlink rate is 1.2 Gbps whilst the ISS has a downlink of 100 Mbps. It's not that bad but certain experiments on the ISS save the real data on storage devices and brought back to earth to not interupt the flow of data Also you probably have noticed if ever theres a life broadcast from the ISS the quality can be iffy
your information seems somewhat outdated. the iss bandwidth was upgraded from 300 Mbps to 600 Mbps in 2019. additionally, i'd like to point out that it's a research facility and not a television studio, so video quality is not exactly a prime concern.
Having bandwidth and real time high quality video comms is good to have. Same as transferring any information at double the rate or more.
It's like Bill Gates saying we only need 64K memory or whatever.
Sure you can do things with 64K and even go to the moon with it but what you can do will ultimately be limited by your hardware limits. Same as you can do things with less power but you can obviously do even more with more power, and why they upgraded the bandwidth and the solar arrays and everything else they can. This is even more important when you can get more for less with newer tech and designs(ie more ability for less space/weight)
That's why we invented compression, what experiments need 1.2Gb/s back to earth, clowns.
@@feignitclowns? Lol. More bandwidth is better, even if you never use it. One day you will. Compression is not ideal, and if you don't need it, it's better to not do compression since ultimately you will be giving up detail/quality and/or time due to your more limited bandwidth. You can also use compression with more bandwidth, there's literally zero downside. You can do twice as much in half the time.
You could also do Morse code with 1kb to transfer information back doesn't change the fact that more bandwidth is better and will allow more data to be transfered which opens up possibilities that would otherwise be impossible.
Like just say you saw a UFO, and now China can send highest quality video back to earth in real time while also maintaining live video conference calls with multiple people.
So while you can only do one video call low quality, I could be transferring massive universe mapping data from xuntian space telescope(even if compressed, the universe is massive) and also high quality live streaming UFO and other members on board could also be doing live broadcasts and video calls with multiple sources, while another one is also having a break and watching high quality live stream if his favourite movies or talking to his family etc.
Who knows. All you need to know is that more bandwidth is always better and you will find uses in the end. Even if it's not maxed out, it will still transfer faster. And that is always a good thing. Maybe you are one day in life and death situation and you need to transfer something quickly and also have high quality video stream the whole time. Maybe you have emergency medical issue and surgeon in earth needs live video feed and needs to operate remotely in the future.
It's the same as saying we went to the moon with computer the size of a telephone booth and with processors less power than my calculator from 20 years ago. So why need more powerful or faster computer? Such flawed copium mentality. Lol.
There's literally unlimited examples where faster is better. There's no situation where slower is better so i don't see what your even trying to argue about. Clowns. 🤣
Importantly, Apollo and astronauts got it from the moon decades ago.😊 NASA will do it again soon. Indians just did it unman, although Jews failed. go figure
Any video about China will never lack hate speech in comments
Well this is RUclips, a USA website after all, not surprising since USA hates China the most.
And it will have the opposite effect that the commenters intended. Instead of seeing China for it's good and bad when younger people see disparaging comments like that they'll immediately see it as propaganda because people on TikTok don't talk like that.
any platform with Amurikkans will never lack hate comments, whether the target is china, mexico, russia or any non-US vassal states
@@kangkim150 Western democracy is about allowing oneself to be a rogue and not allowing others to speak
all western Sinophobe's that cant handle that China is doing fine. they keep believing in anti china propaganda told by the US. all brainwashed.
What's interesting is , the module names of chinese space station comes from our ancient poetries and mythical legends. “tiangong” （天宫）means heaven or some place gods live there, it was first mentioned in a myth called (about AC 266-420). The space lab module “wentian” is from a poem written by "屈原" in BC 340-278， names “天问” （Asking to the sky）. Then the "meng tian" （梦天）means dreaming about sky(or may be cosmos), "tianzhou”（天舟） means sky boat driven by the gods, "tianqin" （天琴）means music from heaven, "tianhe”（天和）means we all stay harmonious in the sky (that's why he is the core module). I can't describe how beautiful those names are, those names carries our ambitious dream about the universe, and those dreams last for over 4000 years. And there's also something intresting, Most of chinese don't worship gods before Tang dynasty, they worship the "天” (the sky), they belive there's some super naturel power over there, so the chinese local religion Taoism worship the creator and world keeper "天". When we talking about the sky or the cosmos, every thing happend on the surface of this planet is insignificant, we humans will step out of this planet and even this solar system, it's the curiosity engraved in our genes, and the ultimate dreaming about the world.
"Clean walls" also helps to reduce the amount of dirt (dust, molds, ...). Fighting it after the fact is pretty hard in space.
How is that? All the molds etc will be hiding behind the walls where it will be hard to clean as well as repair if something breaks, like when a mircometeor hits.
@@johnarnold893 Yeah, having your eyes on everything should make it easier to keep things clean.
It also slows access during critical times when trying to put out a fire when wires have shorted. That's one of the reasons so much was left exposed in international launches, so astronauts could quickly access and address problems. Looks clunky but it's functional.
@@tomwhone9804 Yeah. People (see: This video) get really carried away with things looking like an iPhone. Everyone has consumer brain - companies don't even want you to know how their stuff works, let alone be able to work on their products. Design requirements are different for professionals.
*antagonist space mold enters the chat*
Wentian = Asking the Heavens; Mengtian = Dreaming of the Heavens.
NO！ tian=sky
Its so cool that wentian is actually a research lab, kinda bares the meaning of asking for heaven's answer to their questions which is really poetic
@@xiaoyanshe797 That's direct surface translation which is dumb. Go back to school.
@@xiaoyanshe797 sky is sky, heaven is heaven, 天问 is asking to the god/heaven, wondering the answer, how can sky reply?
天 指的是 天道，问天 是 占星。@@chungwayne1624
The space station looks like you can stand up and walk around and enough room for everyone even space for personal needs.
It's truly a marvel of engineering and a huge step up in quality of life for those on board!
@@TheSpaceRaceYTJust because the ISS interior has an industrial appearance it doesn't imply that the residents have a poorer quality of life.
lol wut did you actually watch this video smh
@@anthonyshiels9273 I was just saying that it has more room for scientific experiments and personal space for astronauts that's all.
@@davidchou1675 Yes I did and part of the vehicles popping interior of the space station that's I was commenting about.
a little nitpick, the name "wentian" "问天" actually mean "ask the heaven" as if they asking or questioning, inquiring the heavy to learn its secrect, kind of poetic isn't it
中国关于航空的命名都是来自中国古代的著作，人物和传说。中国古代的东西都很有诗意
those who advocated for legislation to prohibit china from participating in any projects related to the ISS must have mixed feelings now. "what does not kill me only makes me stronger" applies to china.
America never learns --- it was the space station, now it is 5G, 6G, semiconductors, NEVs, ai chips, quantum chips, renewable energy and more. China will dominate and then the U.S. will lose a big chunk of the global market.
That was never the point. China's space agency is directly part of the military. You can't mix a civilian structure and military personnel.
@@diogocarvalho2934 --- Why???? Why must every one follow the U.S. or western model? Every nation has the absolute right to do things its own way!
Don't glorify the American model so much; it's outdated. look at human history over thousands of years - in times of war, does anyone care if it's military or civilian facilities? It's hypocritical protectionism and exclusivism.
@@diogocarvalho2934 Don't hype up the American model so much， it's merely a representation of a specific era. If you reflect on thousands of years of human history, during wartime, does anyone really care whether it's a military or civilian facility? It's such a hypocritical stance of protectionism and exclusivity.
Not easy for the Chinese to achieve this, under NASA's total isolation.
In another sense, once they really achieve this, they have full control over their own intellectual property rights.
Agreed
NASA’s total isolation?
WTF? Apparently now the USA is responsible for funding and developing every nations space program.
I repeat, what the fuck?
Your every nation doesn’t include China.
@@yessir7147 Are you sure it includes China? Prove it.
On top of amazing technological advancement achieved by the Chinese space programme, the names they've given to each module and rockets is simply poetic; they're named after characters from Chinese folklores
The unofficial name of the station is 豆腐渣工程, Dòufuzhā Gōngchéng.
Classic case of inferiority complex and inability to admit the technological advancement China has achieved.
@@Astuga then why you guys worry so much :) sit tight and enjoy the firework
@@不染铅华 Who said I'm worried?
I will enjoy the shit show that China under the CCP is. What will crumble first - the three gorges dam, the financial system or the space station?
Please remind us all of the US national debt.
Of course Ms Yellen says US can afford two simultaneous wars.
Uhh, against who I wonder.
The debt is big enough to worry the leading speakers for the Republican party when contemplating Biden's subsidies for Ukraine .
It's frequently discussed in Congress. Prospects of a crumbling economy for USA ?? Lets see some balance and perspective in comments please.
The United States has therefore banned China from accessing the ISS, but wishes to carry out missions on the Chinese Space Station...
Banning your opponents is the best way to boost their development...
'Keep your friends close but your enemies closer' Sun Tzu in The Art of War
2:29 ...As a chinese, I do not know why, but I laugh SOOO hard when I saw the decorations🤣...I have the almost same one on my front door.
It is logical, normal, and expected, that each generation be an improvement over the last.
The name alone is glorious
I have seen many pictures of the International Space Station, and the interior looks like a garbage dump full of wires.
Cuz it was built 40 years ago without major rehabilitation for the past 20years
and yet no crackheads have stolen all that wiring . Gee , I wonder why ? 😂
Excellent visual and illustration.
Just to add, the longer arm is also able to crawl around to different mounting point.
So can canadarm
He said it
ok.... so?
@@Aiophgy Canadarm2 also includes a track and a mobile base that can move a long distance along ISS structure.
CanadArm does this for decades
Special thanks to America for pushing China to strive for the very best.
America is still pushing for China to land a human on the moon. I mean it's only been over 50 years.
Trump又来推动啦
The ISS is a hybrid between the planned Soviet Mir-2 and the US Freedom space station. That is why there is a distinct "Russian Orbital Segment" and a distinct "United States Orbital Segment." Pressurized Mating Adapter 1 (PMA-1) connects the US Node-1 "Unity" module to the Russian "Zarya" module which was the core of Mir-2. Russian modules are attached to Zarya, while American, ESA, Italian, and Japanese modules are attached to the US Unity and Harmony nodes. The US nodes, along with the ESA, Italian, and Japanese nodes, were all intended for Space Station Freedom. The ISS shares the "Integrated Truss Structure" planned for Space Station Freedom.
The ISS is a chimera of Mir-2 and Freedom. To suggest it is simply an evolution of Mir is technically and historically incorrect. Also, China's Tiangong space station's Tianhe module heavily leverages the Russian Zarya module design, and its Wentian module heavily leverages the Russian Zvezda module design. Also, China's Shenzhou spacecraft is effectively a scaled up Soyuz. Design-wise, Tiangong is just as much an evolution of Mir as the Russian Orbital Segment of the ISS. The cleaner interior of Tiangong is likely due to the fact it has not been continuously occupied for decades, like the ISS. Constant additions of experiments, equipment, etc. have caused more equipment to be attached, and more power and data cables to be extended. Photos from the early ISS expeditions show a much less cluttered interior.
Your so called information are pure misinformation.
Thank you for you take on the station's design :)
Needs an edit: There were two development leads here: Zarya was an FGB block, originally planned for Mir, not Mir-2, and history put paid to its use; Zvezda was originally earmarked for Mir-2, and as such was built in the mid 1980s. FGB's were just modules never cores, just a development from TKS, from when it competed with the Soyuz design. There was some infighting on the Russian side which led to the FGB inclusion, otherwise it would have developed without it. Crucially, the extended modules of Tiangong and Tianzhou, are essentially the projects that Russia could not afford to build - the science modules are from Russias science & power module development and Tianzhou is the extended Progress path. Japanese module Kibo was the largest module on the ISS and when you see it after installation it looked incredibly spacious, as do all things when we first first move into them. Due to historical events, both SSF and Mir-2 looked in danger of never happening, but, mainly for political reasons, they ended up saving each other, whilst adding a bridging space station between the two: the Shuttle-Mir program, the importance of which cannot be overlooked.
有效信息👍
天宫里面的马桶还是按照美国马桶的模式来设计的😂
Westerners: China stole European and American “space station” technology.😈
：But Europe and the United States have not built their own space stations.😮
Westerners: This is not the point. What we are concerned about is that the Chinese stole our space station technology.🤡
At 14.45 you say that the module generates 7kW. This feels wrong. I think this array is around 200 squares metres. The best panels in space will probably generate about 300W per square metre. That works out around 60kW. I am estimating some of this but cannot belive these panels only generate 7kW.
Agreed. The upgrades to the ISS put it at 200KW theoretical.
The 7kw number is probably a mistake and a guess to the "Hall electric propulsion" this station uses a ion engine to boost it's altitude
Did seem low.
Approximately 90kw
Hi, below info is from an Chinese article. It says the area of the solar panel on Tianhe core module is 134 square metres with output greater than 18kW. Together with solar panels on Wentian and Mengtian expansion modules, the total output is expected to be more than 90 kW. This is roughly 80% of power output when compared to the ISS. The article also mentioned that the energy conversion efficiency of the solar panels is 30% compares to the 18% for the ISS. I dont know how accurate this is though, hope it makes sense.
The Soviet Union had a great influence on the new China. Like a teacher, the Soviet Union helped establish the industrial base. Later, the United States became New China's business partner and developed economic and trade. China is good at learning from the strongest countries and absorbing the parts that are beneficial to itself.
确实是这样
你总结得非常到位
yes
I doubt the solar cells only generate 7KW, more likely 70 KW
design of CSS is 90kw, plus power generation by space ships, up to 120kw
There is a pretty clear and huge leap in Space Station design going from Skylab to Mir. The change from monolithic to modular is the most significant change is station design so far.
I find it interesting how this creator has shown Skylab in multiple videos as if it were made from the S2 Stage 2 stage of the Saturn 5 instead from the S4B Third stage from which it was actually made. The S4B stage is 22 feet in diameter and the S2 stage was 33 feet in diameter. 11 extra feet wide would have been awesome but unfortunately was not the case. Enjoy what you are doing. keep trying and shoot for a little better accuracy. I was only 6 at the time Skylab flew but there are those here that weren't her at all when Skylab flew. Cheers.
Yes, it's at about the one-minute mark. "The Space Race" seems generally an insightful YT channel- maybe the graphics person screwed that up. Still it should have been caught. It looks ridiculous.
Current Situation in dialogues:
1 Americans: No Space Stations!
1 Chinese: Understood. Developing Space Stations. Tiangong go live in 5 years!
2 Americans: No Chips!
2 Chinese: Understood. Developing Chips. Kirin Chipsets go live in 2 years!
3 American: ...
3 Chinese: hey, what's up? why are you weird? What's next?
4 American: ............
15:23 there's another use for the robotic arms, as depicted in 'Space Force' 😁
哈哈，剪掉翅膀
_Japanese animators working noises_
Yeah murica making robots to press button in their station, well remote been around for almost 100years now.. what a waste..
I would really like to see China build a space station like that seen in Stanley Kubrick's "2001 - A Space Odyssey" which will really shake things up. The current space stations are really just reiterations of past "clip-on" booster rocket segment versions.
At present, the solar power of China's space station is 100-120KW
China is moving forward in a rapid pace, its as if they think 20 years ahead of everyone nowadays, and they complete stuff so quick! Made in China started as a meme and ended with a WIN!
Anyone who's into tech knows the real deal of how great Made in China is. I'm an artist and Huion beats Wacom any day.
It's hilarious that you think propaganda designed for internal use on illiterate Chinese citizens will ever change how the world views the China. In the west, China is the same as Africa. it's where we go for slaves, that is all they are good for.
这个源于邓小平，是他让中国做一只蚂蚁，一定要保持低调，现在已经发展成一头大象了，实在是隐藏不了了，那就干脆和美国勇于亮剑
The functioning of LM-5B is not really original. This was used for the Space shuttle and Ariane-5 and in fact the Soyouz launcher use it also. It is sometime called one stage and half.
Long march is an amazing name for a space rocket. Liked it since i read near-future sci-fi 20+ years ago. China's predicted space industry growth often played key roles in many world saving projects in those books.
The Canadarm could also do the caterpiller movement along the ISS.
Second one yeah!
Yeah, unfortunately NASA and Canada didn't make as much noise about it as the Chinese, and now they're drowned out by the false claims of Chinese do everything first, and better. *sigh* Chinese refuse to hear that they are not first.
中国的机械臂也可以进行转位
In your dream？
@@naokiokusa5578 "Unlike the original Canadarm, Canadarm2 is not permanently anchored by one of its ends. Both ends have a locking effector (LEE) that can be used as an anchor point while the opposite end performs various tasks, including gripping an electromechanical terminal (PDGF) on the Station. This concept allows Canadarm2 to move around the Station like a spanner caterpillar, by fixing its ends in turn to the electromechanical terminals (PDGF) distributed at various points on the exterior walls of the Station." And it did so already back in 2001.
Great job pal!
It was a pleasure to watch this vid.
*UNLIMITED SOCIAL CREDIT*
EDIT made this comment as a joke, but I sorted by new and holy shit some of of you are not capable of independent thought. "Hey guys did you know China has a space station?" - "HOW MUCH DID THEY PAY YOU!"
i just love how any shape or module alignment works in space. nothing has to be streamlined. you're limited by your imagination and necessities to complete your space experimentation and or missions.
would be cool if they invented the first space nuclear reactor
This thing looks great.
Tiangong is essentially Mir but modernised. Its still a radial modular station, using a core module that others are attached to.
ISS is a true modular station with separate pressurised modules connected in chain with multiple nodes, and a separate truss for solar panels and cooling. Tiangong has integrated solar and cooling.
You mention the ISS has bottlenecks, I'd argue that Tiangong is the station that exhibits bottlenecks as it has a central point where all modules connect. This also doubles as the airlock, limiting access to other sections when a spacewalk is in progress
Its likely that all these projects respect launch constraints. Cylindrical units sized to the diameters of the rockets. It would be nice to build something more interesting but maybe utility rules apply. The Swiss Chalet style will have to wait. Its likely UTube critics are not engineers but Star Wars addicts.
Great way to downplay someone else's accomplishments just to make yourself feel better about your limited worldview.
@@boxtears Limited by nature or deliberately downplaying a perceived adversary ... maybe more America First or Down With Commies
This is just a CCP propaganda piece dude...
@@evrythingis1 If you followed this channel you would know it's impartial.
In technology terms, 20 + years is a very long time, so it shouldn’t be a surprise. Unlike the ISS modules which had to have backwards compatibility to older designs, multiple standards and runs on a lot of tech that goes back to well before smartphones. It was also mostly designed to be transported by space shuttle, limiting dimensions and weight and the differing needs of the international modules and purposes.
It was a set of pragmatic decisions based on what was practical given the limitations above. China didn’t have to worry about any of that which was a huge advantage, along with newer technology to play with as well as tons of knowledge gained from all the existing space programs from the US, Russia and Europe. It also didn’t have to worry about congress dicking around with funding and endless committees.
Thanks for the video, really interesting and best of luck to China on future modules for their space station....this is really cool...I think the US regrets their law preventing them from going on the Chinese space station as the ISS is on it's last space endeavours...
Thanks for the information, one note for improvement: please do not use this flickering effect (like here 10:55, and here 11:15), your video is very peacefully paced, these transitions may be annoying to viewers. Thanks in advance.
Agreed, I love the information, I don't like the blink-cuts. It's disorientating and distracting from your truly fascinating info.
Once they begin to extract scarce industrial resources from space, these stations will adapt to become the platforms we see in the High Frontier and 2001
Well done China, very informative
Thanks for the video summary. It is also interesting that the TianHe Core Module carries a set of Hall Effect Thrusters that can help to maintain orbit height. However it is not clear how effective it actually is.
Put it this way, Tiangong is 21st century stuff, while ISS was so last century.
But isn't Tiangong is a project from 1 country while the ISS was joined forces?
@@luutuan7162 Correct, and your point is?
@@syncmaster915n your statement is lacking crucial detail, so i just kindly added it. You don’t like that?
@@luutuan7162 My 'statement' is a sarcastic comment against the ISS and a praise to Tiangong! You need to improve your English comprehension! In sarcasm, there is no need for details and it's not a matter of like or dislike. How old are you? you sound like you're a 12 year-old wanting to be a 22 year-old!
What happens when your space research isn't limited by the capacity for profit.
Smart Chinese ! There space station is 100% made by and invented by Chinese. Same for their global positioning system, up to 1 meter accurancy. They even invented their own atomic clock all by themselves. Amazing achievements by one country.
100% made, but not invented. It is mainly Soviet station, conceptions, technologies.
The stations modules are entirely based on Soviet DOS and OPS modules. It's not something they invented at all. Just something they bought in the 90's and 00's from Russia.
@@VG_164 China also bought a very stripped hulk carrier ship from Ukrain in late 90's, now they are making their own 4th carrier with nuclear power. China is able to significantlly & quickly improve/re-invent it from the old tech. The west slows down a lot in renovation because they are too self competence now. How long can they live with their old patents ?
A century ahead is a gross overstatement.
Excellent and informative presentation!!
和GPS一样，当初美国对中国关闭了GPS，导致中国的船被困在海上很久，于是中国就组建了北斗定位系统。
Chang 'e-6 scanned the entire far side of the moon but never found the American lander. One small step for man, one giant leap for Hollywood😂
😀
Open a book and learn that the USA never landed an apollo mission on the far side of the moon
interesting😄
They never landed on the far side of the Moon 🤦♀
This Chinese space-station is heavily influenced by Russia, clean(bacteria-free), Station MIR was retired after human bacteria mutated and began to eat rubber and metals, Russian designed Mir 2(ISS) which does away with these problems, Russia's new station ROSS its NEM-1 core completed will operate in a higher orbit.
Oh my G-d.
So so proud of China 🇨🇳.God bless China 🇨🇳 and all Chinese people, we are truly humbled. May Almighty God 👑 crown your efforts 😊
China: build space station. Explore space.
USA: gay. Trans. Trans woman is woman. lesbian, gay, bi, trans, queer and ace
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ تحياتي لك اخي
😂😂😂😂😂😂
这正是我所担心的，因为2028年洛杉矶奥运会指不定会有多少带着睾丸参加女子类比赛。
20 years difference in technology is a big difference!! We can't speak of it like it isn't. Just compare the cellphones of 2004 with the phones we have today!
When you ban the neighbourhood nerd from playing with your PS3 so he goes and buys a PS5
LMAO
Great video as usual 👍🏻 That “glitch” transition effect is really horrible on the eyes though.
I can't believe how far down I had to scroll to find this. It made me stop watching while very interested, please stop using this effect
FIrst time I saw it I thought "ouch, bad edit." Then they kept doing it. The old "do it once, it's a mistake, do it repeatedly and it's cutting edge."
Sometimes I wonder if we need a completely new and separate nation that anyone around the world can join, with the intent to improve human capabilities without political intervention.
Hell, wasn't that supposed to be the UN? Could still be, if people didn't keep messing it up. lol
我们的
@@jxiaozhuo 不是中国
bro，that‘s what communist aim for
@@zander_the_space_nerd While made in China is cheap.😊Made in USA, Bentley, Rolls Royce, 007 drives American made Aston Martin, Bugatti, Mercedes Benz, BMW, Porsche, Ferrari, Lamborghini, just to name a few. Hope I made you happy.
"like a Mir version 2.0".... thats because the ISS is... The core of the ISS is Mir 2.0 Zarya and Zvezda modules were supposed to be a Mir 1/2 modules and were used as the core of the the ISS. To this day the Russian modules on the ISS are the main/first modules on the ISS eg Zvezda life support systems.
I get why America would block China but not Russia (while wasting hundreds of billions to Ukraine) from the ISS, but the reasons are so silly and annoying.
It's cause Russians plaay a key role in still running the ISS along with contingencies, I've always thought Space ought to bypass politics down on the ground if possible and serves as a means of reconciliation and what we can do together
Because the international space station was made in Russia.America was making some beds and tables.
I hope they can get along in the future
Fun fact: the Shenzhou spacecraft's name is also a pun on an artistic name for China (also pronounced Shenzhou)
神州 神舟
On China side, there is no space race like in 1960s, it is just progressing its space exploration program based on road map set 15-20 years ago .
I mean if you take Chinese grammar into account than then names should be closer to ‘to dream about space' and 'to ask about space/ knock on the heaven for answers'
Thanks -- I thought something was off about the translation!
Dreamers in Heaven (天梦）, Peace in Heaven（天和）, Inquirers in Heaven（天问）, Gazers in Heaven（天巡）
@@Andrew_ATC I would argur that since 梦 is used in the front, it serves as a verb here. And i do believe that 巡 is generally used to mean patrol/search, espacially when it's not being paired with other words. Other than that, I do find your translation sharp and clean, good job.
@@chenkunnie Thanks, 😃. I chose "Gazers" because "天巡" is a telescope, if I remember right. "巡", in this context, means to scan the space. Chinese is a very compact language so the literal translation into English can often be too wordy. Adaptation is necessary to make the end product sound nice in the target language. If I were to name the modules in English, I would drop "in Heaven" and make them simply Dreamer, Inquirer, Gazer, and Peace/Harmony. IMHO.
@@Andrew_ATC One thing that I hate about the English language is that new words always need to be created in order to express precise meanings. Now this huge vocabulary has exceeded one million words, and I can't even imagine how many words there will be in 100 years.
7 western countries and Japan invaded China in 1900
now China：I'll take you all on ！
1. The Long March is the 4th most powerful rocket behind NASA's Space Launch System, the Falcon Heavy, and the Delta IV Heavy. I'm a little surprised you didn't know that. The SLS launch was a pretty big deal.
2. Regarding the arm, matching the size is not the same as matching capability. There are many factors to consider, and an extra joint is a weak point. We don't know the exact capabilities of the combined arm(s), but it's safe to say that it doesn't quite have the same strength as Canadarm 2 (let alone 3, under construction for the Lunar Gateway).
3. Nothing about this space station, as you have described it, is a reinvention. It is a very respectable achievement, certainly, but it is essentially a copy of existing technologies. They have done excellent work in other domains, however.
Similarly, this mechanical arm is only the first generation, and the second generation will be online soon. But also can be directly installed, which is very convenient to operate.
你给我复制一个看看？
Many our houses have plaster on them because our masonry is a secret speciality. Smart