He's been a solid ambassador this far. And he raises valid and good points in this discussion. He's also learned what those of us Americans who have lived in Japan for decades know - Japan is a "normal" society in terms of social order, it's America that's out of whack.....
Good end of Conversation analysis! Amen! All of us have do our part to hold our ideals and principles high and defend them! Thank you Ambassador and thank you children and their fellow service men for their services!
Always appreciated Rahm’s style of talking. And super smart and charismatic to boot. Please continue in public service. God willing with another term in the Biden administration, you will be able too.
After the events leading up to and including WWII itself? No thanks. Japan is better off in all ways with the current American military garrison there and in adjacent areas in the region. Many other East and Southeast Asian nations agree to varying extents with the steps America is trying to take to detour as well as contain the PRC. Being in Japan as it has been is an integral component to the broader strategy. You don't have to like what I'm saying but you better get used to it.
@@TJCMN What about the events after WWII and the economic miracle? Additionally, if the U.S. hadn't stayed and rebuilt Japan the Soviet Union would have stepped in and added it to its sphere of influence. We wouldn't have the Japan of today if it were not for the U.S. determination to rebuild Japan and the Japanese can-do spirit. Take a look at the two Koreas. I don't think you have a good grasp of world history when it comes to the 20th century.
@@juanf5391 I think there's a misunderstanding on either my end or yours regarding my response to the OP -I am not against (at least not as a whole) what America did after the Second World War in regards to its assistance in rebuilding and redirecting Japan and the broader efforts it made in Asia (as well as Europe) to ensure the Soviets and then the PRC couldn't fill a potential power vacuum either directly or by proxy such as supporting Japanese Communists of various stripes and affiliations. My main point of contention was that I don't see why what the OP or even why based on what you just were mentioning, this should lead to America withdrawing its military assets and decamping from its bases there. They are a crucial part to the wider strategy that America is attempting to implement in order to prevent the PRC and others such as the DPRK from attempting some sort of revanchist campaign. Especially given the current volatile circumstances that define the Indo-Pacific region as a whole. Feel more than free to disagree, but at least disagree based on my actual premise since it sounds like you're mischaracterizing what my original sentiments here were.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
He's been a solid ambassador this far. And he raises valid and good points in this discussion. He's also learned what those of us Americans who have lived in Japan for decades know - Japan is a "normal" society in terms of social order, it's America that's out of whack.....
Good end of Conversation analysis! Amen! All of us have do our part to hold our ideals and principles high and defend them! Thank you Ambassador and thank you children and their fellow service men for their services!
This guy is so melodramatic. He's a performer, not a diplomat. But again, that seems to be the trajectory of US politics in general.
the hand-gestures are mesmerizing
Always appreciated Rahm’s style of talking. And super smart and charismatic to boot. Please continue in public service. God willing with another term in the Biden administration, you will be able too.
Rahm Emmanuel is a neocon war thug.
Move your soldiers out of Japan and let Japan live as a free nation.
Only if N.Korea and China wouldn't invade, which we know they would.
After the events leading up to and including WWII itself? No thanks. Japan is better off in all ways with the current American military garrison there and in adjacent areas in the region. Many other East and Southeast Asian nations agree to varying extents with the steps America is trying to take to detour as well as contain the PRC. Being in Japan as it has been is an integral component to the broader strategy. You don't have to like what I'm saying but you better get used to it.
@@TJCMN What about the events after WWII and the economic miracle? Additionally, if the U.S. hadn't stayed and rebuilt Japan the Soviet Union would have stepped in and added it to its sphere of influence. We wouldn't have the Japan of today if it were not for the U.S. determination to rebuild Japan and the Japanese can-do spirit. Take a look at the two Koreas. I don't think you have a good grasp of world history when it comes to the 20th century.
@@juanf5391 I think there's a misunderstanding on either my end or yours regarding my response to the OP -I am not against (at least not as a whole) what America did after the Second World War in regards to its assistance in rebuilding and redirecting Japan and the broader efforts it made in Asia (as well as Europe) to ensure the Soviets and then the PRC couldn't fill a potential power vacuum either directly or by proxy such as supporting Japanese Communists of various stripes and affiliations.
My main point of contention was that I don't see why what the OP or even why based on what you just were mentioning, this should lead to America withdrawing its military assets and decamping from its bases there. They are a crucial part to the wider strategy that America is attempting to implement in order to prevent the PRC and others such as the DPRK from attempting some sort of revanchist campaign.
Especially given the current volatile circumstances that define the Indo-Pacific region as a whole. Feel more than free to disagree, but at least disagree based on my actual premise since it sounds like you're mischaracterizing what my original sentiments here were.
They both need to read," Paekche's Principle: The Great Secret of Asia"
gross