Excellent comparison. I love the .22LR and run through thousands each year, own multiple brands of rifles and pistols, and have shot it for nearly 70 years. But I also enjoy grabbing my .22WMR Marlin Rifle and hitting just a little harder. But the most unique experience I've ever had was with a .17HMR. I got a used/new (previously owned/never fired) Savage rifle that had a nice scope on it but it had been installed backward! Well, just sitting at my desk, I pulled the scope off, turned it around and reinstalled it just using my eyes to judge alignment. I then took it out to the range to check it out. I placed a normal target -- the shoot and see kind -- on a 4X8' board at 100 yds knowing I would likely find the bullet somewhere way off the paper. I fired one off the bench and switched to my spotting scope but couldn't find a bullet unless... the target had a white spot in the bullseye... but no, that wasn't possible. So, I fired a second and switch to the spotting scope and can't believe what I think I'm seeing. So, I fire a third and switch to the high power scope again. Then I had to rush down the range to check to see if I was actually seeing what I thought I was. YES. My first shot had hit the target absolutely dead center in the tiny white bullseye. The second created a tiny bulge on the upper right of the first hole and the third created a tiny bulge on the upper left of the first hole. I'd just shot the most perfect group I'd ever fired from a brand new rifle with a scope I'd just mounted without any tools or gadgets. I went back and kept shooting it... I was picking tiny spots on the sheet as my target, one of the numbers or the copyright emblem, etc. and hit every single one of them. That was the most amazing day I've ever had at the range in 70 years.
22 MAG has always been a favorite of mine. First rifle I bought at 7 years old was a 22 MAG and let me tell you what. I still have it to this day. People jaw drop when they see me shooting iron sights at 200 yards with quarter size groups.
I was always a 22LR and Mag fan from the time I was a kid learning to shoot. From squirrel to rabbit, it was my go-to. A few years ago, someone asked me to take a look at a a rifle he had "found." It was covered in mud and even had a dirt dauber's nest in the barrel. He also handed me a bag of parts that he removed and didn't know where they went. It was so nasty that you couldn't even tell what caliber it was unless you looked at the breech and saw the size of it. Just removing the dirt, I saw it was a Marlin 917. I spent well over a week cleaning and soaking it to get the rust removed. Then, I had to look up a schematic to see where all those little parts in the bag went to. I picked up a couple magazines for cheap on eBay, some Slick 2000 lube, and a cheap $30-$40 scope. I was unsure of how it would fire, so I actually tied a string to the trigger and stood about 5 feet away. It fired fine, so I aligned and zeroed the scope and it shot like a champ. When it was all finished, with my time and a few parts I had to buy, I told the guy I would have to charge him around $150. He didn't have the money, so he asked me if I'd give him $40 for the rifle and call it even. Of course I did it. Over the years, this has been my go to for longer range small caliber. I've taken out a few beavers that dammed up the lakes I live on, a few coyotes, and just to see if I could, a couple rabbits at 100+ yards. I guess I need to show some love to my 22 rifles before they think I no longer love them!
@@MrCobb-rq8ivSure it will, just add a 5 mph cross wind. Both have their uses, when times got tight during the ammo shortage, could always find 17 HMR, have put a bunch through my Savage.
This has been a good demonstration for why we need to use the barrel length, the bullet weight and the bullet speed to calculate the foot lbs. of force from a cartridge.
.22LR subsonic is my all time favourite. Not as deadly as the others, but still deadly on small game and almost silent when suppressed. For everything else, there is centrefire.
I know when I was a kid I seen my dad shoot a red fox at about 100 yards with a 22 magnum and it took its lower jaw off and I know this because I seen it first hand, i have never shot a 17 hmr so i will not knock that round at all.
I'd agree. However if I was in the field and I'd only be carrying one it'd be the .17 HMR due to that flatter trejectory and ability to reach further out and touch the varmits. The only downside IMHO is if you've got a bit of wind the mass of the 22 mag would have less drift. The compromise would be to have one with swapable barrels, however that would not be ideal to do in the field.
17 HMR does have a flatter trajectory way past 100 yards but it loses energy must faster than the 22 mag. If your shooting rabbits it won't matter. If your shooting tougher game like Coyotes it will.
Growing up in the hills of the Appalachian mountains, a 12 gauge and .22lr were the only two long guns needed. Oh, and did I mention that everywhere had those two for sale? To hillbillies everything else is just a "niche" round. 😆
Yep, Country boys learn young that you can take a heck of a lot more food home with a little bullet placed properly than with a big bullet placed poorly.
Hell yeah!! Appalachian and Allegheny Mountain raised!! Hunted with both ,a Marlin 22WMR bolt action,and a 12 gauge Remington 870. (Had a Marlin 36 30-30 in the gun rack) For what we hunted that's all the gun we ever needed
I agree but now you get a combo gun. 30-60/12 gauge for deer/quail or the ultimate squirrel gun 22 mag/410 over unders. Yrs ago you could get a "drilling" but their not made anymore and stupid expensive. Side by side shotgun with a rifle between/top of the shotgun. Now. If you can find one? 10-15 thou $$ is on the cheap side.
@kennethlocke4213 I had one of those 30 plus years ago. Didn't know what I had then 😞 .22lr on top .410 on bottom. Can't remember who it was made by as I got it in a trade for a 70s Buick Centurion. $45, a.22lr, and the over under. That was just before I left for the Army in 85. Not sure where it is now. Nostalgia took over and bought me a Pardner .410 3inch last year. I bought a 9mm sleeve for it due to hard to find slugs and my grandson (14) loves shooting it 🙂. Not to much longer it'll be his 😊. Hope he hangs on to it better than me.
Great fun, I also have a 17, an LR and my new Savage 22 mag. They are all so much fun at the range, loved to to see the underestimated power of these three rounds going through Stainless.Enjoying the videos from British Columbia Canada
Even the lowly 22 short will kill. I set up a similar test to yours with white pine 2x4's (nominal) with .22 short, .22Long Rifle, and .22 mag out of a North American Arms revolver (short barrel) and the short protruded just out of the first board and the 22 LR and .22 Mag were about the same through 4 boards. A brain or heart shot with any of these and "game over". Thanks for the test !
100 % correct ! I use 22 subsonic for deer control. They are quiet......and accurate ! No need to " kill " shoot not to kill.......they go off.......never to be seen again ! Accurate out to 150 yards ! They do the job !
I think that the 22 mag was compromised by hitting center of plate . Center of plate has more flex give . I think that if you shot the 22mag again near the side of plate it would go thru one more plate
@@neilmoreland5476 probably a neat idea , but as of now 32h&r mag is very hard to find and favor seems to be falling from 327 as I type . In my opinion 327 is a very practical round as interchangeable with 32 long and 32h&r mag.Also 32 calibre bullets are renowned for accuracy. I don’t know what’s going on with ammo manufacturing but many calibers seem to be non existent.I always wanted to see an N Frame 8 shot in 22 hornet
@@randyblackburn9765 Randy ,,Thanks for your response and imput on the 32 cals..I'm aware of the current 32 cal centerfire cartridges which are pretty available here in SW OHIO where I reside. I'm bout 20 miles SW of Dayton Ohio. What I was really talking about is the 32 cal Rimfire ammo which has been obsolete since the early 1900s. There use to be many different Rimfire calibers available until the centerline rounds started dominating and the 22 cal long rifle rimfire hit the market and it too dominated the market. If my memory serves me right,, 32 and 44 calibers Rimfires date back to use in the Civil War even. I've shot some 32 cal long, Rimfire in my old Stevens rifle that my Dad had bought and was very impressed with it,,so I'm hoping some manufacturer of both guns and ammo might jump on the bandwagon and bring it back,,,and maybe make a rimfire, Long Rifle and Magnum round also both in rimfire.. I have 3 boxes of 32 caliber rimfire I bought early 2000 that's made in Brazil,,,Last run of 32 cal rimfire that I'm aware of. It was $41.00 a box of 50 then, round 2005.. Guess what it's going for now? Might as well be a box of GOLD now.. Wish I'd bought more,,guy said he had a pallet of it,,buy all I want..Duh,,I bought 3 boxes then.. But I wasn't aware the Brazilian company was shutting down production of their 32 cal rimfire long ammo then either...
The 22 mag was at a slight disadvantage because it was just above the plate support which would cause a little more flex and absorb some of the shock. I believe if the shot were as low as the first two the mag would have made it through the fifth plate.
I think that the 17 did the best. It basically matched the result of the 22 mag at half the weight. I do see the point of the place even with that. Half the weight.
Most excellent comparison demonstration. All three rounds have definitive uses. .22lr = targets 25# or less @ 100m. 22mag = targets 100# or less @ 100m. .17mag = targets 75# or less @ 200m. Just a basic rule of thumb...
In the case of the cal.17, hollow-point type ammunition should not have been used, because when it hits a hard surface, it ensures the smallest possible penetration in addition to releasing all its kinetic energy to the surface! For punching through stainless steel sheets, not an optimal projectile type! Compared to the other projectiles in this test, the cal. 17, started at a disadvantage! Nevertheless, it ranks well because the impact surface of the 17 caliber is ~33% smaller than that of the 22.
Dude, you are mine and my boys favorite bull lots feller😂 Got 2 boys and we always put your videos in our top 5 and enjoy. Congrats on having a crap ton of subscribers and staying real brother.
@@patrickgriffitt6551 its a rimfire cartridge adapted from a .27 cal nail gun cartridge using 15, 20 or 25 gr .17 projectiles. It is currently the fastest rimfire in the world and the trajectory is absolutely amazing on it!
I often wondered which was more powerful so now we have a pretty good idea, Thanks to you! And stainless is very tough! Ruining a few drill bits in my day drilling the stuff. Of course I wouldn’t want to be on the receiving end of any of those rounds! Kind Thanks and Many Blessings! DaveyJO in Pennsylvania
I bought a .17 HMR for the ballistics. It shoots a lot flatter than the .22mag. If you are dealing with pests in an area with clear view out to 400 feet the .17 does not require you to make adjustment whether that gopher is at 50 feet or 400. I can aim the scope straight at the center.
Hi Larry here I have them both, my personal belief is that little 17 HMR is a wicked round, have used it a lot, KEEP UP THE GOOD VIDEOS I LOVE WATCHING THEM
The .22 mag wins hands down. Not only did it give more damage at the final plate it also gave a larger hole from begining to end. The .22mag is a very under rated cartridge in times past would be the only caliber rifle a household would have due to its versatility. Small game, predators, deer and even used for a slaughter gun for livestock. If anything more was needed the household usually had a shotgun of some type. Another .22 cal. I would like to see you spend some time on is the .22 hornet. Many backwoodsmen here in my area loved this caliber as a go to for everything. Nowdays its kinda considered a novelty caliber but i still believe it hard to beat in the predator hunting game. Unbelievably Its also legal for deer in my home state.
22 mag. is a very well designed cartridge. It put several small centerfire rounds out of the varmint business. such as the 25-20 and 32-20 because the ammo and rifles are cheaper but still get the job done at short ranges.
The 22 hornet is an old cartridge, I think it dates back to the 1880's also it's a center fire so it would out perform just about any rimfire. For being an old round it's very expensive. I knew a rancher in Oregon who like it, he said is good flat shooting round up to 200 yards, used mainly for coyotes, small game and non-game varmints on his land. Always kept the rifle in his ranch truck.
@@michaelmurphy6869 - that is the problem with the Hornet - cost and availability. That's why the 22 mag. put the small varmint centerfires out if business. Ammo and rifles are cheap, and it is good up to 150 yards for varmints which is plenty for most farmers, hunters, etc. Compare the cost of a 22 mag. rifle to a 22 Hornet, no contest.
WTW, very good and informative video. Thank you! Everyone should own at least 2, 22lr, a hand gun and a rifle! Cheap ammo, fun to shoot. A friend staying with me had a Ruger lever in 17, Turkey running, fired, at 15 yds. went through a pine trim board on my garage, and still at about 60 yds. hit and killed the turkey. Impressive. But, cleaning that 17 is harder than a 22 cal. Many cleaning kits don't include rod's or tips for 17 cal. Also ammo availability and cost. As I stated before, 22 lr first, 2nd of the three, 22mag. Ammo in my area is more available than 17. I like to stick with ammo that has passed the test of time. I don't hear much about the Ruger 204 today, will the 17 or the 5.7 stick around? Performance wise, GREAT calibers! I will stick with my Ruger 10/22 for squirrels and wood chucks up to ?75 + yds. After that distance I pull out my Grandfather's Rem. 722 in 222 cal. Yes more recoil and retort, but I reload the ammo. myself with much less cost than cost than 17 or 22mag. OK guys and gals, above, I mentioned ammo passing the test of time, I digress, the 222 has rightly been replaced by the 556/223. I also own the following firearms I have inherited in calibers which have passed the test of time, but their time has unfortunately passed! A Sav. 99 in 358 cal. Win. 53 in 44-40, a nd a Win. 1895 in 405 cal. I have purchased reloading components for all to allow their legacy to continue! But I would love to be able to afford to own all of the three cal. of this video! ! Can't have too many guns right?
Rim fire fan here WhoTee so i enjoyed this one a lot ! I love the MacGyver metal sheet stand !!! All three rounds pack a lot more punch than most folks realize !
I still like the 17 HMR because it has an edge on accuracy over the 22 Mag. For another test try the 20gr FMJ in the 17 HMR vs the 40 FMJ in the 22 Mag and lets see how they compare .
I shoot a fair amount of .22LR out of either a Ruger 1022, or an M&P 1522. Love both. Great on small game and pests. But for range, accuracy and flat trajectory, you would be hard pressed to beat the .17HMR. I love my CZ and it has been an incredibly accurate and long reaching little rifle. I have never shot a .22WMR, so have no personal experience, but looking at your results, it seems clear it has excellent stopping power, but possibly at the cost of quite a drop off in trajectory at anything much over 75 to 100 yards. My .17 has been amazing out to 200 yards on occasion and my longest measured rabbit, was out at a ridiculous 275 yards one very still summer evening. A small hold over did the trick and the devastation from that wonderful little round was 'convincing'! Fun video here; thanks for the effort in making it.😊
That 17 hmr is no joke, lot less grain, bullet fragmented and still did what the mag did.. wow.. Speed kills .... I've wanted an HMR AR for a while... Can't find one, so after this, I'll just get me a BOLT action one.. Nice video, by the way... Thanks
This was a test of penetration where a smaller pointed projectile at higher velocity has a distinct advantage. The 22 WMR is much more versatile and with well placed shots can take down a hog or a deer at up to 100yds.
22mag here. I missed the 50grain game shock These were great on sml hog, coyotes, and NA River Otters. Hard to find. these but they do travel slower but the penetration is great.
I’ve shot several groundhogs at 165 and 135 yards with my Savage 17 HMR with bull barrel. On the other hand I like my Savage 22 mag for fox and coyote at closer rages or when breezy conditions. Both are good tools for the right job. Thanks, I enjoyed your comparison!
That .17 has some “boogie”. I’d love to see PCC’s or Henry’s shooting pistol rounds and the same test. 9mm, 45ACP, 38 spl, .357 mag, .44 spl, .44 mag, …….whatever you can “round” up. Some of us would love to get a rifle with the same ammo as a pistol. Maybe one rifle round at the end for comparison. Thanks WTW.
So why didnt you use China plates & 5w30 while standing on your left foot & include a .375 H&H because I have a Chevy & would like to see a 12 gauge pumpkin ball on a Tuesday but had a .30-30 & think that this test should've been done in a swimming pool because my cousin can swim if he has spare ammo for his .220 Swift? ALL seriousness aside: We DO appreciate your time, your expenses incurred, your efforts & your family's understanding! Thank you. Never stop. Never let the naysayers get you down. Never slow down. We love you Brother. We appreciate your hard work. And we appreciate your efforts to keep it real & interesting! Yet another good video man.😉👍
Great video Hootey. How far was the muzzle from the first plate? It would be interesting to see how the three performed at rimfire ranges at say 50 - 70 yards. Thanks for sharing.
I'm a huge .17HMR fan since we got them here in Australia around late 02 early 03. 17 has worked on every thing I've shot at. It would be interesting to see the damage on the 20gr hollow points from the .17HMR as the 17gr are polimer tip that helps the bullet dump more energy and breaks up. Love your work big fella
It was also a hollow point that was designed to break up. It is my assumption that if they all three had jacketed solid lead bullets the .17HMR would have gone through more plates.
I’m a big fan of the li’l ole .17HMR. Only have 1 gun chambered in/for it though and it’s a Taurus revolver and it’s a 6” barrel and the model 617 I believe it is? But then I also like the .22 Win Mag. And who doesn’t like the .22LR?! Great video and demonstration Hoot.
Thanks Who for another great video! Love your down to earth tests! Just a suggestion if possible, why not try small caliber center fire rounds (e.g 17 Remington, 204 Ruger, 220 Swift all those rounds are pushing the 4000fps relm) and shoot from a 100 yards or less at that same target set up. That would cool to see the results and after do the clay tests to make some modern art. Thanks again brother looking forward to the next videos. Keep up the great work!! God bless ya!
I thought that the mag moved the entire assembly the most. Though I went back and looked at the 17 and they appeared comparable. I'll bet they both may go through one more plate if the assembly was secured to the table. A lot of energy was lost just moving the assembly. I'm a 22 mag guy myself. Great video!
Great video. I’m bookmarking it to share. WMR’s “.22” nomenclature belies its power to many. This also is gonna help me when I get into conversations with folks who remain steadfastly against the possibility that softer aircraft aluminum couldn’t damage the steel of the towers on 9/11. Velocity’s tangible effect was illustrated quite aptly in this presentation. Lead is considerably softer than SS.
I have the heavy barrel Marlin bolt rifle bolt rifle and the Taurus revolver in .17HMR. Absolutely love how they shoot, but they are a pain to clean. The revolver gets clogged up with powder residue, due to the shorter barrel. You also have to be very careful with the smaller diameter bores when cleaning.
I own, and shoot, both 22 Mag and the 17.... When using both with V-Max type bullets, at practical ranges, in my experience, the .22 Mag wins hands down... Bigger hole going in.....MUCH bigger hole going out....Your results may vary.....but I DOUBT IT....
@Logan-py8we not true. Ammoseek website always has it. I have a healthy supply I can locate from suppliers around the country. You have to willing to look further/try harder than the local gun shop.
You forgot about the Remington 5MM, which is .20 cal. Equal to a .22 mag. The 5mm has a 38 gain that flies at 2100 fps, 1605 at 100 yds, and 372 ft lbs at the muzzle. My favorite for years and they make the ammo again.
12ga and 22lr were the main guns people owned when I was a kid. I was the "fancy" gun owner with my .22 mag. We called in the "big guns" with my uncles Rem .270 !Nothing in TX couldn't be dropped with those rifles.
Can you do a video on Marlin .444 vs. 45-70 lever action please. I have Marlin .444 it's my favorite deer rifle and you don't hear much about them. It's been putting meat on my table for 30 year's. Love your videos WTW. I'm retired in PA.
Before you get into rimfire, take a look at the latest modern pellet guns or known as air rifles out nowadays, close to as powerful as a rimfire 22 LR, cheaper to shoot and quiet, it is all that a person needs, with a scope.
22LR is a winner for me. Like a shotgun shell, there are so many diffrrent rounds. Rat shot and Sub shorts for the back yard, Sub sonic 850, Sub 1180, all the way up to hyper velocity and Vmax heavy, for bigger game. Cheapest ammo. This is really the go-to firearm. With a decent scope they can snipe a bird at 100 meters.
If you use a 17 fmj then it will win. If not then either the 22 or 22 mag will win. If that 22 lr is a round nose fmj then it will go through the most plates
@@ABSilverback Small correction threre. jhp in 17 hmr is not soft point but fragmenting bullet. Same as v-max bullets but whitout plastic tip. In video can see that effect quite clearly when it made two holes in plate number 3. Overally nice perfomance against 22wmr which weighted two times more while being normal lead hp bullet. I think with fmj bullets 17hmr will go deeper because that round is really punching holes way above its weight class. Edit: Generally 17hmr 17 grain bullets are fragmenting and 20 grains are either soft points or fmj.
Glad you did this comparison between 17hmr and 22 wmr I was looking for next rifle guess I gonna go with 22wmr just because of price ammo cheaper than the 17hmr
basically the 17 and 22 mag have double the powder charge of the 22lr… and a .223 has double the powder again. i wonder if a 223/556 would of gone through them all…i’m thinking no problem, but…. haha. great video! cheers
I think what would be good to see is how the three compare at distance. The 17 hmr will certainly shoot flatter, but I suspect the 22 mag will retain more stopping power as the distance goes out.
I have been comparing 22mag and 17HMR for along time on multiple distances and targets. Kill power is about the same. I think it is speed vs power in making the bullet expand that equals out the kill power. Accuracy out to 100-110 yards is pretty much the same... after that the 17 continues on a flatter trajectory with speed.and the 22 mag keeps more energy. I have found that the 20gr 17HMR is a better round out of my Savage bolt action, heavy barrel. Thanks for the cool video. Always enjoy them.
I'm a 17hmr guy and also love 22lr. But seeing your test shots I do like that 22 magnum. Seems to hit hard! A friend of mine loves his 22 mag and has it dialed in to take turtles at 40 or so yards and it does do very well. Thanks for showing your test shots and the stainless panels depth guage!😊
I was falling a sleep the first and second times watching this ( not video's fault ). I had the same thoughts as some of the other commenters. After I woke up I went back and rewatched a third time ( hope in some way it help with the analytics ). Saw that both the 17 HMR and the 22 mag were JHP's I've always wondered about 22 mag. Awesome idea on this comparison was going to suggest FMJ's compared but if memory serves me correctly no one makes a 17 FMJ in fact the 1 shot here is the closest to that....
.22 mag for punch .17 for the long range accuracy .22 for the all around economic bullet .22 mag for this win on this test but , all those calibers are great calibers .
Excellent comparison. I love the .22LR and run through thousands each year, own multiple brands of rifles and pistols, and have shot it for nearly 70 years. But I also enjoy grabbing my .22WMR Marlin Rifle and hitting just a little harder. But the most unique experience I've ever had was with a .17HMR. I got a used/new (previously owned/never fired) Savage rifle that had a nice scope on it but it had been installed backward! Well, just sitting at my desk, I pulled the scope off, turned it around and reinstalled it just using my eyes to judge alignment. I then took it out to the range to check it out. I placed a normal target -- the shoot and see kind -- on a 4X8' board at 100 yds knowing I would likely find the bullet somewhere way off the paper. I fired one off the bench and switched to my spotting scope but couldn't find a bullet unless... the target had a white spot in the bullseye... but no, that wasn't possible. So, I fired a second and switch to the spotting scope and can't believe what I think I'm seeing. So, I fire a third and switch to the high power scope again. Then I had to rush down the range to check to see if I was actually seeing what I thought I was. YES. My first shot had hit the target absolutely dead center in the tiny white bullseye. The second created a tiny bulge on the upper right of the first hole and the third created a tiny bulge on the upper left of the first hole. I'd just shot the most perfect group I'd ever fired from a brand new rifle with a scope I'd just mounted without any tools or gadgets. I went back and kept shooting it... I was picking tiny spots on the sheet as my target, one of the numbers or the copyright emblem, etc. and hit every single one of them. That was the most amazing day I've ever had at the range in 70 years.
This was satisfying just reading it
22 MAG has always been a favorite of mine. First rifle I bought at 7 years old was a 22 MAG and let me tell you what. I still have it to this day. People jaw drop when they see me shooting iron sights at 200 yards with quarter size groups.
22mag is my favorite since as young age, love the round
200 yds... Sorry. NOPE
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Smoking crack🤣 bro you need to go shoot at the Olympics if you can shoot like that
He must have meant 200 feet, which is roughly 66 yards. Otherwise, complete BS.
I was always a 22LR and Mag fan from the time I was a kid learning to shoot. From squirrel to rabbit, it was my go-to. A few years ago, someone asked me to take a look at a a rifle he had "found." It was covered in mud and even had a dirt dauber's nest in the barrel. He also handed me a bag of parts that he removed and didn't know where they went. It was so nasty that you couldn't even tell what caliber it was unless you looked at the breech and saw the size of it. Just removing the dirt, I saw it was a Marlin 917. I spent well over a week cleaning and soaking it to get the rust removed. Then, I had to look up a schematic to see where all those little parts in the bag went to. I picked up a couple magazines for cheap on eBay, some Slick 2000 lube, and a cheap $30-$40 scope. I was unsure of how it would fire, so I actually tied a string to the trigger and stood about 5 feet away. It fired fine, so I aligned and zeroed the scope and it shot like a champ. When it was all finished, with my time and a few parts I had to buy, I told the guy I would have to charge him around $150. He didn't have the money, so he asked me if I'd give him $40 for the rifle and call it even. Of course I did it. Over the years, this has been my go to for longer range small caliber. I've taken out a few beavers that dammed up the lakes I live on, a few coyotes, and just to see if I could, a couple rabbits at 100+ yards. I guess I need to show some love to my 22 rifles before they think I no longer love them!
Awesome video! I myself am a 17HMR guy and have a good buddy who shoots 22mag and we find them very comparable in most real world applications.
No they are not comparable, the 22 mag will never shoot with a 17 HMR
@@MrCobb-rq8ivSure it will, just add a 5 mph cross wind. Both have their uses, when times got tight during the ammo shortage, could always find 17 HMR, have put a bunch through my Savage.
Uytff
Would be interested in what the 5mm mag rimfire would do
.17 for the win all day long. I find no reason to argue with FUDDS.
Always had a soft spot for thw 22 Mag. Can't shake it
This has been a good demonstration for why we need to use the barrel length, the bullet weight and the bullet speed to calculate the foot lbs. of force from a cartridge.
For the price, why not just go 5.56 military surplus ammo?
Same. Especially with a hornady vmax
Idk why I have the same feeling man, can relate 100%
Yep, same here. Got a rifle and a Smith model 48. Great stuff.
.22LR subsonic is my all time favourite. Not as deadly as the others, but still deadly on small game and almost silent when suppressed. For everything else, there is centrefire.
Seems you can put a Lamb's Nipple on the barrel
22 60 grain aguila is my favorite pistol and rifle round for 22
And feeding it is very cheap . $60 Canadian for 500 brick of 22 lr
I sold off my Ruger 77/17 years ago but was impressed with the damage that 17HMR did at the level of noise that it produced.
They are surprisingly loud for sure.
They have a higher pitch ( and louder) then the .22 mag
I have always been a 22 WMR fan. Thank you for the comparison!
I do not think the plates are 3mm..
Truly a really fun video. 22 mag for shorter distances. 17 for longer. Bit flatter trajectory.
I know when I was a kid I seen my dad shoot a red fox at about 100 yards with a 22 magnum and it took its lower jaw off and I know this because I seen it first hand, i have never shot a 17 hmr so i will not knock that round at all.
I'd agree. However if I was in the field and I'd only be carrying one it'd be the .17 HMR due to that flatter trejectory and ability to reach further out and touch the varmits. The only downside IMHO is if you've got a bit of wind the mass of the 22 mag would have less drift. The compromise would be to have one with swapable barrels, however that would not be ideal to do in the field.
Exactly spot on.
@@PaulAtreidesMuadDib Agree 100%. The .17 will be affected more by crosswind.
17 HMR does have a flatter trajectory way past 100 yards but it loses energy must faster than the 22 mag. If your shooting rabbits it won't matter. If your shooting tougher game like Coyotes it will.
Growing up in the hills of the Appalachian mountains, a 12 gauge and .22lr were the only two long guns needed. Oh, and did I mention that everywhere had those two for sale?
To hillbillies everything else is just a "niche" round. 😆
Yep, Country boys learn young that you can take a heck of a lot more food home with a little bullet placed properly than with a big bullet placed poorly.
Hell yeah!! Appalachian and Allegheny Mountain raised!! Hunted with both ,a Marlin 22WMR bolt action,and a 12 gauge Remington 870. (Had a Marlin 36 30-30 in the gun rack) For what we hunted that's all the gun we ever needed
I agree but now you get a combo gun. 30-60/12 gauge for deer/quail or the ultimate squirrel gun 22 mag/410 over unders. Yrs ago you could get a "drilling" but their not made anymore and stupid expensive. Side by side shotgun with a rifle between/top of the shotgun. Now. If you can find one? 10-15 thou $$ is on the cheap side.
@kennethlocke4213 I had one of those 30 plus years ago. Didn't know what I had then 😞 .22lr on top .410 on bottom. Can't remember who it was made by as I got it in a trade for a 70s Buick Centurion. $45, a.22lr, and the over under. That was just before I left for the Army in 85. Not sure where it is now.
Nostalgia took over and bought me a Pardner .410 3inch last year. I bought a 9mm sleeve for it due to hard to find slugs and my grandson (14) loves shooting it 🙂. Not to much longer it'll be his 😊. Hope he hangs on to it better than me.
@@kennethlocke4213 do you remember who mfg the 22/410?
Great fun, I also have a 17, an LR and my new Savage 22 mag. They are all so much fun at the range, loved to to see the underestimated power of these three rounds going through Stainless.Enjoying the videos from British Columbia Canada
Even the lowly 22 short will kill. I set up a similar test to yours with white pine 2x4's (nominal) with .22 short, .22Long Rifle, and .22 mag out of a North American Arms revolver (short barrel) and the short protruded just out of the first board and the 22 LR and .22 Mag were about the same through 4 boards. A brain or heart shot with any of these and "game over". Thanks for the test !
@@LeaverAction Also as quiet as a pellet gun.🤔
100 % correct ! I use 22 subsonic for deer control. They are quiet......and accurate ! No need to " kill " shoot not to kill.......they go off.......never to be seen again ! Accurate out to 150 yards ! They do the job !
everybody loves a "how many does it go through" video of any calibre!
I think that the 22 mag was compromised by hitting center of plate . Center of plate has more flex give . I think that if you shot the 22mag again near the side of plate it would go thru one more plate
I was thinking the same. But I just like the 22 mag alot more. Great rimfire cartridge
Looks like a lot of people have their own opinion 's,no one has made another video to prove or disprove what was illustrated...... show me
@@paulpetty3331 maybe who tee who will show us
@@neilmoreland5476 probably a neat idea , but as of now 32h&r mag is very hard to find and favor seems to be falling from 327 as I type . In my opinion 327 is a very practical round as interchangeable with 32 long and 32h&r mag.Also 32 calibre bullets are renowned for accuracy. I don’t know what’s going on with ammo manufacturing but many calibers seem to be non existent.I always wanted to see an N Frame 8 shot in 22 hornet
@@randyblackburn9765 Randy ,,Thanks for your response and imput on the 32 cals..I'm aware of the current 32 cal centerfire cartridges which are pretty available here in SW OHIO where I reside. I'm bout 20 miles SW of Dayton Ohio.
What I was really talking about is the 32 cal Rimfire ammo which has been obsolete since the early 1900s. There use to be many different Rimfire calibers available until the centerline rounds started dominating and the 22 cal long rifle rimfire hit the market and it too dominated the market. If my memory serves me right,, 32 and 44 calibers Rimfires date back to use in the Civil War even.
I've shot some 32 cal long, Rimfire in my old Stevens rifle that my Dad had bought and was very impressed with it,,so I'm hoping some manufacturer of both guns and ammo might jump on the bandwagon and bring it back,,,and maybe make a rimfire, Long Rifle and Magnum round also both in rimfire.. I have 3 boxes of 32 caliber rimfire I bought early 2000 that's made in Brazil,,,Last run of 32 cal rimfire that I'm aware of. It was $41.00 a box of 50 then, round 2005.. Guess what it's going for now? Might as well be a box of GOLD now.. Wish I'd bought more,,guy said he had a pallet of it,,buy all I want..Duh,,I bought 3 boxes then.. But I wasn't aware the Brazilian company was shutting down production of their 32 cal rimfire long ammo then either...
The 22 mag was at a slight disadvantage because it was just above the plate support which would cause a little more flex and absorb some of the shock. I believe if the shot were as low as the first two the mag would have made it through the fifth plate.
I agree if the shot placement of the 22mag was lower it would have gone through 5
Should have simply inverted the plates before shooting the 22 Mag.
@@glennrishton5679 Or new plates, nothing about this test was correct, pure BS.
I think that the 17 did the best. It basically matched the result of the 22 mag at half the weight. I do see the point of the place even with that. Half the weight.
I agree. The flex in the center of the plates ate up more of the punch.
Most excellent comparison demonstration. All three rounds have definitive uses. .22lr = targets 25# or less @ 100m. 22mag = targets 100# or less @ 100m. .17mag = targets 75# or less @ 200m.
Just a basic rule of thumb...
In the case of the cal.17, hollow-point type ammunition should not have been used, because when it hits a hard surface, it ensures the smallest possible penetration in addition to releasing all its kinetic energy to the surface! For punching through stainless steel sheets, not an optimal projectile type! Compared to the other projectiles in this test, the cal. 17, started at a disadvantage! Nevertheless, it ranks well because the impact surface of the 17 caliber is ~33% smaller than that of the 22.
Dude, you are mine and my boys favorite bull lots feller😂 Got 2 boys and we always put your videos in our top 5 and enjoy. Congrats on having a crap ton of subscribers and staying real brother.
Thanks for watching!
Excellent Comparison of the 3 Calibers Adam 👍. Thanks for the Video 👌. Cheers 🍻🙏🍁.
Great video. The next time I would like to see the 17 HMR switched out to the 17 WSM. Thanks again.
Love my 17 WSM. Nasty little round
@@UserFormelyKnownAs_hjkhisn't that a centerfire cartridge? I'm not familiar with it.
@@patrickgriffitt6551 its a rimfire cartridge adapted from a .27 cal nail gun cartridge using 15, 20 or 25 gr .17 projectiles. It is currently the fastest rimfire in the world and the trajectory is absolutely amazing on it!
Yes me too…. ! ✨🇫🇷✨🫡
@@UserFormelyKnownAs_hjkh
Love to see a video featuring the ballistics of that round.
I often wondered which was more powerful so now we have a pretty good idea, Thanks to you! And stainless is very tough! Ruining a few drill bits in my day drilling the stuff. Of course I wouldn’t want to be on the receiving end of any of those rounds! Kind Thanks and Many Blessings! DaveyJO in Pennsylvania
Stainless is hard on drill bits but as far as steel is concerned, it is relatively soft
I bought a .17 HMR for the ballistics.
It shoots a lot flatter than the .22mag. If you are dealing with pests in an area with clear view out to 400 feet the .17 does not require you to make adjustment whether that gopher is at 50 feet or 400. I can aim the scope straight at the center.
Hi Larry here I have them both, my personal belief is that little 17 HMR is a wicked round, have used it a lot, KEEP UP THE GOOD VIDEOS I LOVE WATCHING THEM
My experience, 17 is the pool for small critters, long range! It just doesn't seem to have enough penetration for raccoons or larger animals.
The .22 mag wins hands down. Not only did it give more damage at the final plate it also gave a larger hole from begining to end. The .22mag is a very under rated cartridge in times past would be the only caliber rifle a household would have due to its versatility. Small game, predators, deer and even used for a slaughter gun for livestock. If anything more was needed the household usually had a shotgun of some type.
Another .22 cal. I would like to see you spend some time on is the .22 hornet. Many backwoodsmen here in my area loved this caliber as a go to for everything. Nowdays its kinda considered a novelty caliber but i still believe it hard to beat in the predator hunting game. Unbelievably Its also legal for deer in my home state.
22 mag. is a very well designed cartridge. It put several small centerfire rounds out of the varmint business. such as the 25-20 and 32-20 because the ammo and rifles are cheaper but still get the job done at short ranges.
Most people don't need or want .22 mag. Return on cost isn't good.
The 22 hornet is an old cartridge, I think it dates back to the 1880's also it's a center fire so it would out perform just about any rimfire. For being an old round it's very expensive. I knew a rancher in Oregon who like it, he said is good flat shooting round up to 200 yards, used mainly for coyotes, small game and non-game varmints on his land. Always kept the rifle in his ranch truck.
@@michaelmurphy6869 - that is the problem with the Hornet - cost and availability. That's why the 22 mag. put the small varmint centerfires out if business. Ammo and rifles are cheap, and it is good up to 150 yards for varmints which is plenty for most farmers, hunters, etc. Compare the cost of a 22 mag. rifle to a 22 Hornet, no contest.
17 takes it. It was only 17grains and did the same as the mag lol. I bet the 20grain 17 will go threw 5 plates
Just for bullet weight and speed combo, ill take 22 mag all day long. Nice vid.
It started with the Automag II for me and now I'm using the PMR 30 for my EDC.
Got em both, hate the mag, 17 HMR all day long, or night.
@@MrCobb-rq8iv your choice, mag doesnt break up as much, speed and bullet weight combo always wins for my needs. enjoy
@@MrCobb-rq8iv Haven't had a chance to play with 17 HMR yet so can't say - what's wrong with WMR that you HATE it versus simply preferring HMR?
but if you hit a rabbit or pigeon they'll be smashed.
WTW, very good and informative video. Thank you!
Everyone should own at least 2, 22lr, a hand gun and a rifle! Cheap ammo, fun to shoot. A friend staying with me had a Ruger lever in 17, Turkey running, fired, at 15 yds. went through a pine trim board on my garage, and still at about 60 yds. hit and killed the turkey. Impressive. But, cleaning that 17 is harder than a 22 cal. Many cleaning kits don't include rod's or tips for 17 cal. Also ammo availability and cost. As I stated before, 22 lr first, 2nd of the three, 22mag. Ammo in my area is more available than 17. I like to stick with ammo that has passed the test of time. I don't hear much about the Ruger 204 today, will the 17 or the 5.7 stick around? Performance wise, GREAT calibers! I will stick with my Ruger 10/22 for squirrels and wood chucks up to ?75 + yds. After that distance I pull out my Grandfather's Rem. 722 in 222 cal. Yes more recoil and retort, but I reload the ammo. myself with much less cost than cost than 17 or 22mag.
OK guys and gals, above, I mentioned ammo passing the test of time, I digress, the 222 has rightly been replaced by the 556/223. I also own the following firearms I have inherited in calibers which have passed the test of time, but their time has unfortunately passed! A Sav. 99 in 358 cal. Win. 53 in 44-40, a nd a Win. 1895 in 405 cal. I have purchased reloading components for all to allow their legacy to continue!
But I would love to be able to afford to own all of the three cal. of this video! ! Can't have too many guns right?
Rim fire fan here WhoTee so i enjoyed this one a lot ! I love the MacGyver metal sheet stand !!! All three rounds pack a lot more punch than most folks realize !
So true
I still like the 17 HMR because it has an edge on accuracy over the 22 Mag. For another test try the 20gr FMJ in the 17 HMR vs the 40 FMJ in the 22 Mag and lets see how they compare
.
I would love to see same caliber different boo-lots, same plates. Just to see!!
Agreed.
They don't or ever won't compare, this XXXX tried to skew the test by shooting a hollow-point 17 against a FMJ, nice try but I call BullWinkle.
@@MrCobb-rq8iv 17 and 22mag were both JHP.
Fake news
Thanks buddy ! You always seem to root out the answers to the average man’s curiosity. !!!!!!
I shoot a fair amount of .22LR out of either a Ruger 1022, or an M&P 1522. Love both. Great on small game and pests. But for range, accuracy and flat trajectory, you would be hard pressed to beat the .17HMR. I love my CZ and it has been an incredibly accurate and long reaching little rifle. I have never shot a .22WMR, so have no personal experience, but looking at your results, it seems clear it has excellent stopping power, but possibly at the cost of quite a drop off in trajectory at anything much over 75 to 100 yards. My .17 has been amazing out to 200 yards on occasion and my longest measured rabbit, was out at a ridiculous 275 yards one very still summer evening. A small hold over did the trick and the devastation from that wonderful little round was 'convincing'!
Fun video here; thanks for the effort in making it.😊
I would say 22LR because you can get them anywhere. Great video.
That 17 hmr is no joke, lot less grain, bullet fragmented and still did what the mag did.. wow.. Speed kills .... I've wanted an HMR AR for a while... Can't find one, so after this, I'll just get me a BOLT action one.. Nice video, by the way... Thanks
.22 mag is my go to but all of my small game shots are under 100 yards. Anything past that I would definitely go with the .17. Great video!
This was a test of penetration where a smaller pointed projectile at higher velocity has a distinct advantage. The 22 WMR is much more versatile and with well placed shots can take down a hog or a deer at up to 100yds.
Interesting test. I like the .22 Mag myself. New sub here from Australia
I had a Winchester 22 MAG Lever Action, great gun
22mag here. I missed the 50grain game shock These were great on sml hog, coyotes, and NA River Otters. Hard to find. these but they do travel slower but the penetration is great.
Ammo seek will find it for you.
Maxi-Mag hp+V 22 WMR 30 Grain are awesome performers in 22 mag , that’s all I use
I’m with you my friend 👍 that’s my #1 coyote round out to 150 yards.🤠
Don't forget hornady 45 gr critical defense, goes into 8" ballistic gel!!
Not surprised by the outcome. Next time maybe try a 30 or 32gr bullet in 22 mag and and a 25 gr in 17. Closer weights. Good video Mr., thank you.
I’ve shot several groundhogs at 165 and 135 yards with my Savage 17 HMR with bull barrel. On the other hand I like my Savage 22 mag for fox and coyote at closer rages or when breezy conditions. Both are good tools for the right job. Thanks, I enjoyed your comparison!
I love this! If you get the opportunity, could you do 17 hmr vs 17 wsm tests?
Great video. The 17hmr is one of my favourite rimfire calibers.
Using a HP for the 17hmr puts it at a disadvantage for sure .... same type of projectile please
I picked up a Ruger 10/22M years ago at a pawn shop. Best used firearm purchase I've ever made.
I've never felt outgunned with a 22Mag.
That .17 has some “boogie”.
I’d love to see PCC’s or Henry’s shooting pistol rounds and the same test. 9mm, 45ACP, 38 spl, .357 mag, .44 spl, .44 mag, …….whatever you can “round” up. Some of us would love to get a rifle with the same ammo as a pistol. Maybe one rifle round at the end for comparison. Thanks WTW.
So why didnt you use China plates & 5w30 while standing on your left foot & include a
.375 H&H because I have a Chevy & would like to see a 12 gauge pumpkin ball on a Tuesday but had a
.30-30 & think that this test should've been done in a swimming pool because my cousin can swim if he has spare ammo for his .220 Swift?
ALL seriousness aside: We DO appreciate your time, your expenses incurred, your efforts & your family's understanding! Thank you. Never stop. Never let the naysayers get you down. Never slow down. We love you Brother. We appreciate your hard work. And we appreciate your efforts to keep it real & interesting! Yet another good video man.😉👍
I guessed the 17 hmr which is one of my favorites. Would like to see a 17 mach2 which is awesome. Great video, thanks for showing us!!
I know what the .22 LR is about. But seeing the WMR and the Magnum tie? Wow. Makes you wonder about knock-down power.
Great video Hootey. How far was the muzzle from the first plate? It would be interesting to see how the three performed at rimfire ranges at say 50 - 70 yards. Thanks for sharing.
Like 5 yards
I'm a huge .17HMR fan since we got them here in Australia around late 02 early 03. 17 has worked on every thing I've shot at. It would be interesting to see the damage on the 20gr hollow points from the .17HMR as the 17gr are polimer tip that helps the bullet dump more energy and breaks up.
Love your work big fella
Penetration was very close. But the way the .17 broke up would cause much more damage to tissue.
More little bits to pick out of your meat.
It was also a hollow point that was designed to break up. It is my assumption that if they all three had jacketed solid lead bullets the .17HMR would have gone through more plates.
Which would be better for pest control, but not so much for small game hunting.
But it hit a metal plate not flesh so you can't really tell.
That was stainless, tissue is worlds different. 22 MAG comes in hollow point.
I’m a big fan of the li’l ole .17HMR. Only have 1 gun chambered in/for it though and it’s a Taurus revolver and it’s a 6” barrel and the model 617 I believe it is?
But then I also like the .22 Win Mag. And who doesn’t like the .22LR?!
Great video and demonstration Hoot.
Thanks Who for another great video! Love your down to earth tests! Just a suggestion if possible, why not try small caliber center fire rounds (e.g 17 Remington, 204 Ruger, 220 Swift all those rounds are pushing the 4000fps relm) and shoot from a 100 yards or less at that same target set up. That would cool to see the results and after do the clay tests to make some modern art. Thanks again brother looking forward to the next videos. Keep up the great work!! God bless ya!
I thought that the mag moved the entire assembly the most. Though I went back and looked at the 17 and they appeared comparable. I'll bet they both may go through one more plate if the assembly was secured to the table. A lot of energy was lost just moving the assembly.
I'm a 22 mag guy myself.
Great video!
Love your tutorials. this demonstration was well executed and helpful thank you . Keep up the good work.!
Appreciate you watching!
Great video. I’m bookmarking it to share. WMR’s “.22” nomenclature belies its power to many. This also is gonna help me when I get into conversations with folks who remain steadfastly against the possibility that softer aircraft aluminum couldn’t damage the steel of the towers on 9/11. Velocity’s tangible effect was illustrated quite aptly in this presentation. Lead is considerably softer than SS.
"Picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue" Airplane movie
Surely you can't be serious...
@@billrowan1957Johnny how about some more coffee? No thanks!
@@billrowan1957 He is. And stop calling him Shirley!
Glad to see I'm not the only old guy watching 😂😂
@@jimchambers7548 🤣👍
I have the heavy barrel Marlin bolt rifle bolt rifle and the Taurus revolver in .17HMR. Absolutely love how they shoot, but they are a pain to clean. The revolver gets clogged up with powder residue, due to the shorter barrel. You also have to be very careful with the smaller diameter bores when cleaning.
I own, and shoot, both 22 Mag and the 17.... When using both with V-Max type bullets, at practical ranges, in my experience, the .22 Mag wins hands down...
Bigger hole going in.....MUCH bigger hole going out....Your results may vary.....but I DOUBT IT....
I’m a rimfire man 👍🏻👍🏻 This test was GREAT !!! Thank you so very much!! All the best from Alabama ✌️
Thanks for watching!
I wasn’t gonna guess cause I had no clue! Lol. I have and hmr and a 17wsm. I like them both. Don’t have a 22 mag yet. Great video! 👍🏻👍🏻
People also sleep on 22 mag out of handguns. Anything over 4inches is basically pocket 22lr rifle ballistics.
The live chat disappeared. Thank you for this video. I want a 17 or A 22 mag, so this will help me. I appreciate it.
Thanks for watching
I wish you had also tested 17WSM, faster than the 17HMR. Thanks for the vid!
@Logan-py8we not true. Ammoseek website always has it. I have a healthy supply I can locate from suppliers around the country. You have to willing to look further/try harder than the local gun shop.
@Logan-py8we easy to find and would have outperformed the others.
The .17 hmr is my varmit cal . I use all 3 calibers a lot 😊
Me too crazy for rimfire
You forgot about the Remington 5MM, which is .20 cal. Equal to a .22 mag. The 5mm has a 38 gain that flies at 2100 fps, 1605 at 100 yds, and 372 ft lbs at the muzzle. My favorite for years and they make the ammo again.
I'll stick with the 17HMR with a 20g fmj. Great video!
Yeah, and not Hollow point 17 hmr like 2 other 22 cal
12ga and 22lr were the main guns people owned when I was a kid. I was the "fancy" gun owner with my .22 mag. We called in the "big guns" with my uncles Rem .270 !Nothing in TX couldn't be dropped with those rifles.
Cool video, I was leaning toward the 17HMR.
E=MC², MVx3, Fe26>Pb82 resulted in me thinking like u, that the 22 mag woulda perforated more steel than the other 2 😂. Fun and informative video sir!
But what if you had used the 20grain game point solid in 17hmr.
Can you do a video on Marlin .444 vs. 45-70 lever action please. I have Marlin .444 it's my favorite deer rifle and you don't hear much about them. It's been putting meat on my table for 30 year's. Love your videos WTW. I'm retired in PA.
Lets go. Love me sum rimfire showdown
I have been wanting to get a rimfire for a while. I think you talked me into it!
Before you get into rimfire, take a look at the latest modern pellet guns or known as air rifles out nowadays, close to as powerful as a rimfire 22 LR, cheaper to shoot and quiet, it is all that a person needs, with a scope.
22LR is a winner for me. Like a shotgun shell, there are so many diffrrent rounds. Rat shot and Sub shorts for the back yard, Sub sonic 850, Sub 1180, all the way up to hyper velocity and Vmax heavy, for bigger game. Cheapest ammo. This is really the go-to firearm. With a decent scope they can snipe a bird at 100 meters.
If you use a 17 fmj then it will win. If not then either the 22 or 22 mag will win. If that 22 lr is a round nose fmj then it will go through the most plates
If he used FMJ for 22 Mag and 17 HMR it would be interesting, the 17 was a HP and the 22 Mag was a PSP so both designed to expand.
@@ABSilverback Small correction threre. jhp in 17 hmr is not soft point but fragmenting bullet.
Same as v-max bullets but whitout plastic tip.
In video can see that effect quite clearly when it made two holes in plate number 3.
Overally nice perfomance against 22wmr which weighted two times more while
being normal lead hp bullet.
I think with fmj bullets 17hmr will go deeper because that round is really punching
holes way above its weight class.
Edit: Generally 17hmr 17 grain bullets are fragmenting and 20 grains are either soft points or fmj.
I did a personal test at home using paper plates it was the 22lr then 17hmr then 22mag went through most, I used ballistic tip on both 17hmr n 22mag
Glad you did this comparison between 17hmr and 22 wmr I was looking for next rifle guess I gonna go with 22wmr just because of price ammo cheaper than the 17hmr
22 mag fmj vs 17 hmr fmj next❤ 😎👍
Nice video! I would like to see the 22Mag with a 50 grain bullet and a 17HMR with the 20 grain for comparison.
So entertaining!! Your the best!!
Thanks for watching!
basically the 17 and 22 mag have double the powder charge of the 22lr… and a .223 has double the powder again. i wonder if a 223/556 would of gone through them all…i’m thinking no problem, but…. haha. great video! cheers
I bought the 22 magnum and never looked back
Great comparison video. Thanks for taking the time to do it.!
Thanks for watching
That was a good video! Thanks!
I think what would be good to see is how the three compare at distance.
The 17 hmr will certainly shoot flatter, but I suspect the 22 mag will retain more stopping power as the distance goes out.
The 17 HMR would have won if you use full metal jackets for metal
I have been comparing 22mag and 17HMR for along time on multiple distances and targets.
Kill power is about the same. I think it is speed vs power in making the bullet expand that equals out the kill power. Accuracy out to 100-110 yards is pretty much the same... after that the 17 continues on a flatter trajectory with speed.and the 22 mag keeps more energy.
I have found that the 20gr 17HMR is a better round out of my Savage bolt action, heavy barrel.
Thanks for the cool video. Always enjoy them.
great job! thank you.
How about a test with 22 mag zoomied through a semi auto - a bolt - a pump and a lever action ?
Loved my Remington 22mag semi auto. Dropped some fallow with it
I'm a 17hmr guy and also love 22lr. But seeing your test shots I do like that 22 magnum. Seems to hit hard! A friend of mine loves his 22 mag and has it dialed in to take turtles at 40 or so yards and it does do very well. Thanks for showing your test shots and the stainless panels depth guage!😊
I was falling a sleep the first and second times watching this ( not video's fault ).
I had the same thoughts as some of the other commenters.
After I woke up I went back and rewatched a third time ( hope in some way it help with the analytics ).
Saw that both the 17 HMR and the 22 mag were JHP's I've always wondered about 22 mag.
Awesome idea on this comparison was going to suggest FMJ's compared but if memory serves me correctly no one makes a 17 FMJ in fact the 1 shot here is the closest to that....
CCI makes fmj.
.22 mag for punch
.17 for the long range accuracy
.22 for the all around economic bullet
.22 mag for this win on this test but , all those calibers are great calibers .
Fun test............well organized. Thanks. Wonder how the 5.7 pistol would have done?
22mag
Wins
Nice. Continue with these tests with pistol calibers. Metal sheets are more reliable than paper plates
Gotta love rimfire.
good video mate 👍
Thanks for watching!
Trump 2024
Bolsonaro 2026
I'd enjoy seeing a re-match but this time with solid ball/FMJ boolats rather than HPs.
Darn good test! One of the fairest I've seen. (Had my 40 grainer RN Golden Bullets in there👍) I would have to give it to the WMR but just by a nose!