$430,000 Watch vs $4,300 Watch: Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 vs Oris ProPilot X Comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 фев 2025

Комментарии • 138

  • @plostyle786
    @plostyle786 2 года назад +36

    I'm amazed at how Tim will be so honest about watches. That's probably the most refreshing aspect of this channel.

    • @coldteeth24
      @coldteeth24 2 года назад +1

      He's not a liar, but if he was truly honest he would tell you that the Nautilus is a gouge even at retail and the Oris is buck ugly.

    • @plostyle786
      @plostyle786 2 года назад

      @@coldteeth24 that's naive to expect that. He is in fact a salesman, so his level of honesty is remarkable. Also, the fact that comments are on and anyone can say anything to these products for sale is remarkable.

  • @512TXSDIY
    @512TXSDIY 2 года назад +8

    Just got my ORIS Pro pilot in salmon (pink) and it’s amazing! It wears smaller than what it looks like in videos. 39MM is just the perfect case size!

  • @kofiofosu9051
    @kofiofosu9051 2 года назад +59

    I like my $430 Seiko. It’s expensive, but I worked hard for it and it gets daily wear.

    • @mr.personal-ity
      @mr.personal-ity 2 года назад +4

      That's not expensive, might be a lot for you but it isn't a lot.

    • @mr.personal-ity
      @mr.personal-ity 2 года назад +1

      @@stanwilson7040 projecting, much?

    • @GarrySkipPerkins
      @GarrySkipPerkins 2 года назад

      But how do you look down your nose at the masses with that? If you enjoy laying people off, Patek Philippe is the brand for you. It is the brand that says “I rape subordinates and get away with it.”

    • @sabeaniebaby
      @sabeaniebaby 2 года назад +4

      @@mr.personal-ity How is your comment helpful?

    • @Koopsstuff
      @Koopsstuff 8 месяцев назад

      @@mr.personal-ityya you really are a prick lol

  • @paulsmith6483
    @paulsmith6483 2 года назад +14

    Just received my Czapek Antartique after a long wait - but wow, worth it. The Oris is an awesome time piece, but comparison is tough - the Czapek for 18K vs the Nautilus - not even close when looked at - love the quick change bracelet with micro adjust, love multiple straps and tools delivered, simple, but really well finished micro rotor movement… and history. I do enjoy Patek, lucky to own two dress pieces, but would never ever spend 120k on a blue dial Nautilus, let alone 450k for a mildly different green shade. Yep, no doubt it will hold value - but this hobby is about enjoying the majestic work watch makers do - day in day out on your wrist….
    For me in this comparison - Oris all day…. Enjoy paying the vault fees and insurance on the Nautilius :-)

    • @vincentschneuwly9783
      @vincentschneuwly9783 2 года назад +4

      I definitely agree, I bought an Overseas but the Czapek is wonderful and I really tought about getting one

    • @joshuae9404
      @joshuae9404 2 года назад +4

      Googled Capek Antarctique. Goddayum that is a lovely watch. Congratulations for getting one - and thanks for putting my attention on this brand!

    • @eyeheartsushi2212
      @eyeheartsushi2212 2 года назад +2

      Agreed with Joshua. Congrats on the Czapek.

  • @neilmartin7776
    @neilmartin7776 2 года назад +10

    I've always loved the Nautilus, it's a gorgeous watch with heritage and style on its side. But you're right about the baggage that comes with it, as well as the scarcity and prices asked. Oris is a great watch company, period. They do simple very, very well. Money no object, I'd still choose the Oris. It's an everyday watch, which is what I want from base metals. Special occasions deserve special materials - gold, platinum - but lounging around, going to work or just grabbing a bite to eat, I prefer steel or titanium, and the Oris is perfect.

    • @neilmartin7776
      @neilmartin7776 2 года назад +4

      @@Danno. nope, definitely would as my daily driver (or one of - my Planet Ocean already serves that purpose). Would the Oris be my only watch? No - Greubel Forsey, FP Journe and Ludovic Ballouard would see to that. Would I buy a Patek? Absolutely - but not necessarily this one. I like the Nautilus, but I also like being able to wear my watches in public without fear of being mugged. Rolex, AP Royal Oaks and the Nautilus are too hot right now to be able to do that in many places, such as London.
      If it was the Oris versus the Aquanaut, no contest - the Aquanaut. But it's the Nautilus, and the baggage is too heavy for me to live the way I like to live. The Oris - wear and forget. What's not to love?

    • @neilmartin7776
      @neilmartin7776 2 года назад +1

      @@Danno. very true. Maybe one day we'll get back to watches just being watches, rather than the price of a decent sized house attached to the wrist.

  • @newton2105
    @newton2105 2 года назад +18

    The Nautilus is a good looking watch, but short of its more advanced complications, Patek arguably offers the worst value per dollar of the high horology brands. Most didn’t even have hacking seconds until recently, and pin sleeves on a watch of that caliber is inexcusable. If I had that coin, I’d be looking at Lange, VC, Laurent Ferrier, and others

  • @peter1509
    @peter1509 2 года назад +5

    I really appreciated this sobering review - keep up the great variety, thank you Tim

  • @Danlikescheesteaks
    @Danlikescheesteaks 2 года назад +5

    The Oris looks like a great watch. My only issue is the dial is so plain. I wish they at least used applied indices to make it pop a bit more

    • @paulsmithchannel
      @paulsmithchannel 2 года назад +1

      Agreed. You would think that for over $4K retail they would have applied indices. My $800 Tissot Gentleman has them. The Maurice Lacroix Aikon dial puts the Oris to shame.

    • @Danlikescheesteaks
      @Danlikescheesteaks 2 года назад +3

      @@paulsmithchannel it's a shame because otherwise it's a very nice watch. And who knows, maybe for whatever reason it wouldn't work as well as I'm thinking, but I feel like applied indices with a nice strip of lume would really elevate it

  • @nukiepoo
    @nukiepoo 2 года назад +11

    The misaligned pairs of indices at 12 o’clock on the Nautilus is INEXCUSABLE. If you haven’t noticed it, the RH one is lower than it’s brother the left… on a $400k watch!

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  2 года назад +2

      Saw it, but it was hard to read the difference in person. But nothing is hidden, either. This is a high-magnification video, and I couldn't see the alignment issue with my naked eyes in the light box. The alignment wasn't clear until I was watching this video while I posted it to RUclips. The Oris dial also is printed a bit off-center, but it's a cheaper watch.
      Best,
      Tim

    • @paulsmithchannel
      @paulsmithchannel 2 года назад +1

      It blows my mind that this would happen on a $35K watch. I agree with you, it truly is inexcusable.

  • @Sk3tchPad
    @Sk3tchPad 2 года назад +4

    The comparison that nobody asked for but everyone needed

  • @jolness1
    @jolness1 2 года назад +4

    The bracelet on the Oris is my favorite part. Bezel probably the second. My wife loves this design, planning to get her one.

    • @fullymechanical9055
      @fullymechanical9055 2 года назад

      Get it for yourself, and she'll get it eventually in the divorce settlement 😁

  • @jeronimo9941
    @jeronimo9941 2 года назад +1

    Thank you for talking about my favorite watch brand (Oris)!

  • @Pulsonar
    @Pulsonar Год назад +2

    Isn’t anyone going to applaud Oris for coming up with this PPX masterpiece? So good it’s worth comparison with the legendary star of Pateks fleet (disregarding the ridiculous hyper-inflated billionaire only price) ?

  • @mitchmatic8029
    @mitchmatic8029 Год назад

    Fun vid Tim. I did pick. And I picked the Oris Pro Pilot. Love it.

  • @kosmonument2682
    @kosmonument2682 Год назад +1

    No object: I would rather keep my money and get the Oris. Object: Oris because obvious reasons.
    In either case, unless you're a clout hunter or have too much money this isn't even a contest. The Oris is unbelievable value for money even when stacked against the fiercest of competitors.

  • @Norman-mn7gp
    @Norman-mn7gp 2 года назад +2

    There is more history and more profit in Patek, but it shares a lot with Oris and seeing my pocket I give Oris the winner.
    There is a very interesting comparison that nobody has done; Divers, in house movement, two crowns, steel and tradition and the two are; Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore Diver vs Jaeger LeCoutre Polaris marine Date ....
    Greetings and my respects to the entire Watchbox team from Central America

  • @stark_syndrome7857
    @stark_syndrome7857 2 года назад +2

    If the oris had applied indices, with a lil bit of better fill lum plots, it would be one crazy good watch,

  • @jolness1
    @jolness1 2 года назад +7

    Are the markers at 12 on the Nautilus not in alignment vertically? I can’t imagine that so I’m thinking it is just the camera/angle.

  • @ethandavis204
    @ethandavis204 2 года назад +5

    Wish you noticed the indices being misaligned. That is inexcusable for a watch at this price point, even at MSRP.

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  2 года назад +1

      I put it front and center for you to judge - nothing was hidden here. The Oris dial also isn't printed squarely, but it costs less.
      Best,
      Tim

    • @ethandavis204
      @ethandavis204 2 года назад

      @@the1916companywatchreviews You can't talk about Patek being quality with something so blatant though. Especially given the MSRP and what Watchbox is asking for it. I expect small errors on an entry level watch, but not an error so obvious on a watch that you are trying to sell for six figures. Transparency is incredibly important nowadays.

  • @bmunson4920
    @bmunson4920 2 года назад +5

    Tim states that the Patek is a better watch ‘in every way’, yet before and after that statement he pointed out the Oris bracelet and clasp is superior…

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  2 года назад +3

      There's more to a watch than what kind of fixture is used for the removable bracelet links. The Patek feels like an MSRP $35,000 watch overall. I was clear about the limits of the Patek bracelet/clasp and why I think every other part of it is better than the corresponding pieces on that Oris. Also, the Patek bracelet is made by hand and visibly more time consuming to make than the Oris bracelet.
      Best,
      Tim

    • @bmunson4920
      @bmunson4920 2 года назад

      @@the1916companywatchreviews Tim, many thanks for the reply.

  • @nenadcubric2663
    @nenadcubric2663 Год назад +1

    U dont like this Oris, but i love the Oris 5 days Cal 403 or 473

  • @Nefville
    @Nefville 2 года назад +8

    This is great Tim, awesome idea! I've only tried on one of these and it definitely wasn't the Patek, I quite like the PPX but I'm kind of waiting for Oris to upgrade the dial, maybe do a green one.

    • @david12990
      @david12990 2 года назад

      Just add some applied markers and I will buy it.

  • @watchnorthlondon
    @watchnorthlondon 2 года назад +4

    I think maybe the Oris is the objectively better watch from your technical description. The Patek is perhaps subjectively better because of the haze of narrative around it.

  • @macmac8122
    @macmac8122 2 года назад +8

    The Oris is the better watch. Better bracelet, better movement, at the very least for the money.

  • @MasterSimpkins
    @MasterSimpkins 2 года назад +1

    When you pivoted to the Oris with screws in the bracelet I laughed out loud

  • @sopapillas6398
    @sopapillas6398 2 года назад +2

    Are the two markers at 12 on the Nautilus a little misaligned or is that just me

  • @PINKFL0YD-s2h
    @PINKFL0YD-s2h Год назад

    Same as You obviously Tim,and for the same reasons. I'm not sure if I'd choose that model though. Oris do a good dive watch I'd prefer.

  • @brandon_youtube
    @brandon_youtube 2 года назад +1

    Awesome Tim!

  • @DavidDatura
    @DavidDatura 2 года назад +13

    $430,000 for a base metal Nautilus…ridiculous! 🤦‍♂️

  • @spliffnotes8359
    @spliffnotes8359 2 года назад

    I personally don't see similarly in style aside from being integrated bracelet sports watches.
    But I love the video and comparisons.

  • @enriquehidalgo630
    @enriquehidalgo630 2 года назад +1

    I would like to see a comparison video of the Royal Oak VS Baume & Mercier Riviera. It was released a year after the Royal Oak and before the Nautilus.

    • @eyeheartsushi2212
      @eyeheartsushi2212 2 года назад

      Seconded but maybe after I buy a Riviera so the price doesn’t go up LOL

  • @KeithApp
    @KeithApp Год назад

    At first glance, I prefer the look of the salmon pink, Oris Pro Pilot X. The blue version will be my next watch purchase of 2024.

  • @stark_syndrome7857
    @stark_syndrome7857 2 года назад +1

    when a watch brand catches a break like this, and a watch in there collection becomes how should I put it, best compares to a MeMe watch(stock), retail investors pushed the price up as high as they could go and good for them but PP didn’t do this and the watch didn’t do it, the retail investors did it, I mean it’s a fantastic watch at its base and no one at PP could of seen this coming, they definitely took advantage of it with the the one year offering with the green dial, but that’s just the craziness of the world post 2020.

  • @milliebays1801
    @milliebays1801 2 года назад

    Should compare the pp to the the citizen caliber 002

  • @jumboJetPilot
    @jumboJetPilot 2 года назад +3

    I’d like to see Oris offer more 18K models. Even if they’re slow selling it would bump them up an echelon as a brand.

    • @neilmartin7776
      @neilmartin7776 2 года назад +2

      Unfortunately they rarely do them. I know they released one for their hundredth birthday, and then again in 1997 with their dual time (there's a pre-owned one at a dealer's near me that I've got my eye on). There was also an 8 day manual wind model released a couple of years back, but these are infrequent, unfortunately.

    • @whereRbearsTeeth
      @whereRbearsTeeth 2 года назад

      Are you serious 🤣🤣?? The the fu** is going to spend $18k on an Oris.

    • @jumboJetPilot
      @jumboJetPilot 2 года назад

      @@whereRbearsTeeth 18K gold watches, not $18K pricing point. I’ll bet they could do 18K for

  • @JamesAlexander14
    @JamesAlexander14 2 года назад +1

    Nice looking watches. Id be frightened to wear the Patek though so it is Oris for me. I would add, I really don’t give a damn about status or investment value. I like watches for their toughness, warranty and style and engineering and the fact that the Oris has a Titanium case with a 10 year warranty, cements the argument for me.

  • @totisanchez3607
    @totisanchez3607 2 года назад

    just looked at the Oris today everytime I go to a PP AD there is none to be had. I live in a country where your arm can be amputated to steal your watch, the Oris I will take a look at again after the holidays.

  • @TerribleUsernameAmirite
    @TerribleUsernameAmirite 2 года назад +5

    Apparently 100x the price and they still can’t colour match the date window

    • @davidr2802
      @davidr2802 2 года назад

      @N A Who make a more durable bag? REI or Hermes? Who cross shops REI and Hermes? Just stop thinking conventionally like a plebe. You think someone looking at a Nautilus is thinking: Wow, that Oris has screws, I'll get that.

  • @robertdodd2204
    @robertdodd2204 2 года назад

    Well said. Good comparison.

  • @rzr77
    @rzr77 2 года назад

    I don’t see any problems with pins and sleeves. I had a bracelet watch fixed with screws fall apart in my hand when one of those screws worked its way out, and the screws were supposed to have been secured with Loctite as well.

  • @johnacteson5503
    @johnacteson5503 2 года назад +4

    Do these 5711's sell at that money? Or the older versions at 100k?

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  2 года назад +3

      The green dials -014 is around $430-$470K today. It rose as high as $500,000 during the silly season last year, but, like all 5711s, it's down somewhat from those heights. Silver dial 5711/1A models sell for the least at roughly $125-150K.
      Best,
      Tim

    • @VmanStudioz
      @VmanStudioz 2 года назад +2

      Agreed! Only dealers listing at these silly prices. Most billionaires and millionaires would never pay those prices as they know there money is parked much better elsewhere. These listings are for dealers to bring you into their digital showroom and sell you other marked up preowned timepieces. In fact, I rarely ever see those timepieces forsale
      in a real showroom period. Most of those digital listings are not even real.

  • @cliffordgriffith818
    @cliffordgriffith818 2 года назад +10

    The oris is technology, patek is currency. I'll choose the oris.

  • @jhrodriguez08
    @jhrodriguez08 2 года назад +2

    If you have 430k usd to spend on a watch , IMO just donate a high percent of that money to a charitable foundation (mental health, cancer, hunger, etc) and get yourself something in the sub hundred thousands if you are so inclined, 430K for a watch is just gross

  • @sabeaniebaby
    @sabeaniebaby 2 года назад

    LOVE the PPX SO MUCH!!!
    The Patek Philippe is almost twice the cost of my house...and I can't afford my house, either.

  • @zetoch
    @zetoch 2 года назад +3

    Oris wins, hands down. Plus you get to buy a house with your remaining budget.

  • @oleg274
    @oleg274 2 года назад +1

    I find Patek's dial extremelly similar to Omega Aqua Terra Olive. The print is very similar, Omega also uses white gold for hands and indices. I'm sure even on micro shots you could hardly spot Patek being more premium from dial perspective in comparison to Omega. Of course the price cannot be justified, those pieces are bought purely for investment purposes. 5711 is a 25-30k$ watch

  • @Salikaan
    @Salikaan 2 года назад +3

    A Nautilus at retail is a awesome watch, one at the current market rate is nothing more than a colossal waste of your money.

  • @normanxiong5614
    @normanxiong5614 2 года назад

    13:25 - 13:50 sums up comparison

  • @gillezzz
    @gillezzz 2 года назад

    I bought one of those two for 2 weeks.

  • @davidomarmartinezcontreras3897
    @davidomarmartinezcontreras3897 2 года назад +1

    That amount of cash on a Nautilus is bananas.

    • @davidr2802
      @davidr2802 2 года назад

      not if you are Jeff Bezos who just made more than the asking price while I typed this.

    • @davidomarmartinezcontreras3897
      @davidomarmartinezcontreras3897 2 года назад

      @@davidr2802 or Andrew Tate. He got a Buggati while writting this.

  • @GR-fn9qs
    @GR-fn9qs 2 года назад +6

    Super random comparison

  • @fullymechanical9055
    @fullymechanical9055 2 года назад +3

    Oris all the way, just to keep a deposit in the bank. $430k pure kraziness.

  • @alastairblair
    @alastairblair 2 года назад

    Professional dealer here in Aus is looking for $700,000 for an unworn 5711-14 today. Make of that what you will.

  • @bnick25352535
    @bnick25352535 2 года назад +6

    Don't spend 430k on this Patek,just spend 350k in a Patek store and you'll be on the list to buy one retail lol.

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  2 года назад +2

      Maybe at one time. Now you can't get it new for any price.
      Best,
      Tim

    • @rey_s90
      @rey_s90 2 года назад +2

      I mean that’s a clever way to think about it 🤔

    • @farbschlachterei
      @farbschlachterei 2 года назад +2

      @@rey_s90 yes it saves you $350.000.

  • @thisnthat4318
    @thisnthat4318 2 года назад +4

    It’s retail is £26,870 so to me that’s the real price

  • @achf6296
    @achf6296 2 года назад +1

    Half a million for a green dial… decades later people will laugh about it… i would never call this an investment… I would definitely go Oris regardless of means, the pricing of the nautilus is just absurd… and that’s a club I certainly don’t want to be a part of… let alone having a watch you can never actually wear because of ever growing theft…

  • @GJames007
    @GJames007 2 года назад +1

    I wouldn’t feel safe buying this watch used! It can really only go down in price not up.

  • @benficaM8888
    @benficaM8888 2 года назад

    The amount of video watchbox is posting these days. means people offloading so hard 😂

  • @sskumariyer
    @sskumariyer 2 года назад

    might as well compare a civic type r vs. a ferrari portofino.

  • @DWilliam1
    @DWilliam1 2 года назад

    The Patek was and is a great watch…but not for $430K. The prices for the Nautilus, most Rolex and the RO are obscene. I’ve been collecting for over 30 years and own more than a few of these pieces but will not buy them anymore at these prices. I’ll stick with Breguet, Blancpain, JLC, Breitling and GO which are still priced sanely.

  • @tonyprice7068
    @tonyprice7068 5 месяцев назад

    This needs more veiws wtf

  • @enterusername7746
    @enterusername7746 2 года назад +4

    This watch sells for 430k now? This is the tulip mania of our time.

    • @eyeheartsushi2212
      @eyeheartsushi2212 2 года назад

      Only the green dial but yes you’re right about tulip mania.

  • @davidr2802
    @davidr2802 2 года назад

    Let's be honest. If you called up Tim to buy the Patek he would throw in the Oris at no extra charge. Which says it all. And in a hundred years the Oris would be somewhere in a drawer or cardboard box with old Seikos, Swatches, and Hamiltons. The Patek, even at $35K list would be a family heirloom everyone would be fighting over. Yes, even with pin sleeves.

  • @piertechinc
    @piertechinc 2 года назад +3

    No watch should cost $430 k. Are you kidding me!!

    • @eyeheartsushi2212
      @eyeheartsushi2212 2 года назад

      Richard Mille begs to differ

    • @piertechinc
      @piertechinc 2 года назад +1

      Maybe. Their watches have a lot of work in them. Still it’s a watch and not a Lamborghini 😀

  • @DouglasRosser
    @DouglasRosser 2 года назад

    The PPX is in desperate need of applied markers. Otherwise it's a knockout.

  • @bharadwajsubramaniamoffici3374
    @bharadwajsubramaniamoffici3374 2 года назад +3

    But Patek is a symbol of luxury and prestige , oris is value for money , but Patek is patek

  • @hubertuswolfthaler
    @hubertuswolfthaler 2 года назад +2

    Do a drop test from the roof of a parking garage, like they do whenever a new iPhone is released ⤵️

  • @tackontitan
    @tackontitan 2 года назад +1

    There really can't be anyone actually buying a Nautilus secondhand. I know there's the "greater fool theorem" but I refuse to believe that people are that dumb.

  • @whereRbearsTeeth
    @whereRbearsTeeth 2 года назад

    I’m confused by the comparison of a Patek to an Oris. Literally nobody is shopping both of these watches

  • @93me11
    @93me11 2 года назад +5

    I bet they both tell the same time!!

  • @JAY-JAY74
    @JAY-JAY74 3 месяца назад

    I’ll take the Oris & go buy a house too.

  • @cy4624
    @cy4624 2 года назад

    It's is not a 430k watch..its is a 15k at best watch retailing for 32k and selling for $430k for bragging rights about how much one paid....not much different than RM selling strategy.
    they are watches under $30k from.small independent that makes it look like a toy.

  • @alihuchyad7929
    @alihuchyad7929 2 года назад +3

    the nautilus is ICONIC

    • @ethandavis204
      @ethandavis204 2 года назад +6

      But not worth 400k.

    • @davidr2802
      @davidr2802 2 года назад +1

      @@ethandavis204 That's opinion, not fact.

    • @ethandavis204
      @ethandavis204 2 года назад +2

      @@davidr2802 Objectively speaking it isn't worth it, given the MSRP. But you are entitled to your opinion, just like I am.

    • @davidr2802
      @davidr2802 2 года назад

      @miguel sanchez Are you Ethan's mini me?

    • @davidr2802
      @davidr2802 2 года назад

      ​@@ethandavis204 I am not advocating for the watch nor the price but perhaps you and your buddy Miguel need to learn the difference between objective and subjective. Subjectively you don't think it is worth it. Fair enough. Objectively you have to say someone does and that is what matters. And I would add often value for money is judged by a person based on how much money they have. If your house cost less than your house you think the price is nuts. If you are Jeff Bezos this is a rounding error that you made while I type this.

  • @RahulSharma-vy6qz
    @RahulSharma-vy6qz 2 года назад +1

    Nautilus can’t beat oris

  • @jimsturt
    @jimsturt 2 года назад

    No chance that Nautilus is worth 430k. Even at MSRP they're pushing it value wise...

  • @FMAlchemst
    @FMAlchemst 2 года назад

    Mid range for a watch vs mid rang for a house 😂

  • @cooz0977
    @cooz0977 2 года назад

    The Oris calibre is a bridge if you just can't quite get up to the $5,800 for the Omega Constellation.

  • @VmanStudioz
    @VmanStudioz 2 года назад +2

    Disgusting thumbnails there Timmy against a 400k watch. Sigh……
    That Patek finish simply doesn’t hold a candle to an A Lange entry level timepiece. 430k for mass market finish? I will happily pass.

  • @sihuhatapiuleng1847
    @sihuhatapiuleng1847 2 года назад

    Tim needs his own in-house manicurist if he's going to be making these videos every day, like a couple manicures per day at least

  • @IkkapAggin
    @IkkapAggin 2 года назад

    The bracelet of the patek.. I can't stand it. Looks like it tapers from 35mm or something.

  • @valebliz
    @valebliz 2 года назад

    ROFL 400k for a nautilus, the market became a joke

  • @thatmexicanguy2989
    @thatmexicanguy2989 2 года назад +1

    The nautilus is one of the most overrated watches ever 😂 boring and a crappy movement… and a pin bracelet? Jesus

  • @Eric_Nielsen
    @Eric_Nielsen 2 года назад

    Proceed to Wrist House; do not pass Wrist Car.

  • @artaudcharles
    @artaudcharles 2 года назад +1

    5711 all the way

  • @frankm4129
    @frankm4129 2 года назад +1

    I don’t believe that that watch will go down in value no way it’s worth more Thant the AD price
    $35,000

  • @fahadkhan-db6bh
    @fahadkhan-db6bh 2 года назад +3

    Whaaat?!

  • @mz-se8ue
    @mz-se8ue Год назад

    Mid-range for a house 🤣

  • @davec3651
    @davec3651 2 года назад +2

    Well, one is ugly and one isn't. You all know which is which, don't try to be cute 😆

  • @frankm4129
    @frankm4129 2 года назад

    Are u crazy &430,000 for that ugly watch please give me a detona any day