Your theory is similar to James Cameron just not as high above the water. I think it’s pretty accurate. What is weird is that no one listened to the survivors who said she did break in half. It’s like they were the crazy people and no one believed them. Until Robert found it
I believe the reason couls have been that many people who said it broke in half said it broke at different parts of the ahip, and were not consistent, another contributor could have been that they refused that the pride of british ship-building could break in half, and many senior officers claimed she sank intact.
@@sushiplays8092 That is true and that makes sense. I think a story was said that some survivors took back what they said and said she sank intact. I dunno if that's true or not.
@@William_AftonReal-------No a survivor did not, a survivor described to someone the breakup, and that someone drew the picture. Not the survivor. The reason why that someone drew a v break is because he thought the breakup point would be underwater, and no one would see that it broke, so he made the bow a different angle from the stern. He wasn't sure how it broke.
@JosefineKRespectfully some was paid off and signed during recovery to say Titanic sank in one. That's why there's 2 report's saying she sank whole or split.
That's not what Ballard's theory looks like... His theory showed the second funnel completely submerge still standing, as well as the third funnel almost fully-submerged when the breakup occurred. And about your theory, the bow section would sink immediately after the breakup, since it's full of water. It also does not explain multiple accounts of the ship being submerged past the third funnel and standing at a high angle when the breakup occurred. However, I do like the stern dipping back a bit after rising post-break - most people don't include that.
Thank goodness a Titanic historian actually commented, and thank you for seeing that, and I will change it. Wait a minute, I used your sfx and I didn't credit you, I will be right back. EDIT: Alr I fixed the description.
By the way, the reason the stern dipped back was because the stern finally disconnected from the bow, but that theory is now outdated, I have a new theory, its in my newest video (Cold Atlantic)
Glad you think so, and thank you so much for staying with this channel! Even though we barely post videos! Also here's a question I have always wondered whenever I saw your first comment, why IS Jupiter in the fridge?
@@gamerbros400I honestly don’t actually know, I saw this roblox rp game about the planets. There was a fridge with Jupiter in it, so that’s where I got it from really.
You know that means a lot to me, but I found out that it isn't so accurate, the bow was pulling the stern down in my animation, but a comment told me that wasn't the case, and the stern sunk all by itself.
I think your theory is correct, but i think it split between the 3rd and 4th funnel. I also think the 3rd funnel collapsed because the split was almost completely underneath it. Then I think as the stern was going down, the 4th funnel collapsed.
with physics and other theories existing, yours is good, just mentioning the bow should go underwater during the breakup, the ship should list to a side and the stern probably shouldve not paused. what is another mistake is that there should be a top cant performed and the galley decks needs to fall. also, good job you got the fourth funnel collapsing correct and the third funnel collapses first, (even though it probably did not fall off)
I personally believe how it sank in the titanic movies in 1997 or 1998 idk but yeah that’s how I believe it sank with the stern really high in the air the ship splits between the last and third funnel and the stern going up again and sitting there straight up then it goes down so yeah that’s how I believe it sank let me know how you think it sank
My 2024 teory the titanic split front of her 3rd funnel went water reach the base of the 3rd funnel the keel fails to hold the stern fell back with the 3rd funnel fell
They fell less than a minute apart at 2:17 am and less than a minute before the breakup. Survivor statements indicate the two forward funnels fell simultaneously.
However that's innacurate. The 3rd funnel collapsed because stress from the breakup was right under it, and it collapsed. The 4th funnel didn't have as much stress. Th 4th funnel broke because the sinking was so fast after the breakup that the 4th funnel fell backwards as water pushed it aft.
Someone who studies every day about the titanic for about a year. So if I had a theory, I could share it with everyone so I could know if I'm researching right. By the way, I animated this.
Your theory is similar to James Cameron just not as high above the water. I think it’s pretty accurate. What is weird is that no one listened to the survivors who said she did break in half. It’s like they were the crazy people and no one believed them. Until Robert found it
I believe the reason couls have been that many people who said it broke in half said it broke at different parts of the ahip, and were not consistent, another contributor could have been that they refused that the pride of british ship-building could break in half, and many senior officers claimed she sank intact.
@@sushiplays8092 That is true and that makes sense. I think a story was said that some survivors took back what they said and said she sank intact. I dunno if that's true or not.
Yeah, but one survivor drew it having a v-break
@@William_AftonReal-------No a survivor did not, a survivor described to someone the breakup, and that someone drew the picture. Not the survivor. The reason why that someone drew a v break is because he thought the breakup point would be underwater, and no one would see that it broke, so he made the bow a different angle from the stern. He wasn't sure how it broke.
@JosefineKRespectfully some was paid off and signed during recovery to say Titanic sank in one. That's why there's 2 report's saying she sank whole or split.
0:17 Around that time in the film, a passenger cries out when her son leaves her behind as her older daughter can only comfort her.
Titanic hit an iceberg she started to sink the bow was under the water at 1:40 am
The 2nd funnel didn't fall in the 1953 movie. You're mistook it with Raise the TItanic.
Thank you for telling us, we will keep that in mind.
@TheAbnormalShrimp It's not. It's from deleted footage from Raise the Titanic which used clips from the 1953 film mixed with their own.
@@gothysballroomwomp womp
my theory is that when the ships break in half the front funnel falls front and back kinda sideways
I personally think your theory is 100% accurate. Good job mate.
That's not what Ballard's theory looks like...
His theory showed the second funnel completely submerge still standing, as well as the third funnel almost fully-submerged when the breakup occurred.
And about your theory, the bow section would sink immediately after the breakup, since it's full of water. It also does not explain multiple accounts of the ship being submerged past the third funnel and standing at a high angle when the breakup occurred.
However, I do like the stern dipping back a bit after rising post-break - most people don't include that.
Thank goodness a Titanic historian actually commented, and thank you for seeing that, and I will change it. Wait a minute, I used your sfx and I didn't credit you, I will be right back.
EDIT: Alr I fixed the description.
By the way, the reason the stern dipped back was because the stern finally disconnected from the bow, but that theory is now outdated, I have a new theory, its in my newest video (Cold Atlantic)
Yea
Oh yes it is, the funnel collapse after it reaches the lower underwater
@@gamerbros400you don’t have videos
WAIT THEY ADDED THE 1997 TITANIC MOVIE 1:17
I Finally realize what you mean by that, the breakup area is the same as 1997 film, is that what you mean?
Very impressive animation and information!!
The animation for this is superb & your theory makes sense!
the 1953 is wrong(according to the film),the 2nd funnel doesn't collapse,the fourth does
The fourth funnel doesn't collapse in 1953, you got it confused with a night to remember (1958)
@@gamerbros400yeah I don’t think any funnels fell in 1953
@@gamerbros400 *realize*sowwy
@@Japanesecatboi4723 but it boom-ed
I saw a delete sinking from raise the titanic
At 2:15 am and 2:16 titanic frist funnel and second fell
The stern list too
At 15 min later the titanic split at 2:15 am
wrong, she split at 2:17 am
Sorry
Sorry
Is my 2024 teory
None of the funnels collapsed in the 1953 film but this is cool
Your theory seems really accurate.
Glad you think so, and thank you so much for staying with this channel! Even though we barely post videos! Also here's a question I have always wondered whenever I saw your first comment, why IS Jupiter in the fridge?
@@gamerbros400I honestly don’t actually know, I saw this roblox rp game about the planets. There was a fridge with Jupiter in it, so that’s where I got it from really.
Cool.
There's no fucking middle piece in the ocean. It's inaccurate. It broke into 2, not 3.
@@TheMooseHoosePls do your research before you comment.
If people knew about this. They would know that you used James Cameron's 2012 version.
No I didnt
@@gamerbros400 yes you did. If it wasn't. Why did it take you this long to figure this out?
@gamerbros400 the only little difference is you made it look like she split into three parts.
@@wheelie_1988she did
@@lochlanmuir2291Excuse me, did you just call me a she?
YOUR THEORY IS PERFECT
You know that means a lot to me, but I found out that it isn't so accurate, the bow was pulling the stern down in my animation, but a comment told me that wasn't the case, and the stern sunk all by itself.
I think your theory is correct, but i think it split between the 3rd and 4th funnel. I also think the 3rd funnel collapsed because the split was almost completely underneath it. Then I think as the stern was going down, the 4th funnel collapsed.
Wrong, the titanic DID break right in the middle many survivors saw.
HOLY CRAP ITS WILLIAM AFTON!!!
@@gamerbros400 lol
I just believe the Titanic Honor and Glory 2024 theory
Good
with physics and other theories existing, yours is good, just mentioning the bow should go underwater during the breakup, the ship should list to a side and the stern probably shouldve not paused. what is another mistake is that there should be a top cant performed and the galley decks needs to fall.
also, good job you got the fourth funnel collapsing correct and the third funnel collapses first, (even though it probably did not fall off)
This is outdated, I will make a new version soon. By the way, if you didn't know, I animated this.
Actually non of the ships split or funnels fell cause the wreck was found in 1997 or whatever by James cameron
no 1985 robert ballard
This is sad 😔
If you liked you dont have to but i thankful 🥹 but i dont have a channel
Yeah I was the one who liked your comment.
No that not how titanic sink in the movie after titanic had split titanic angels to 90 not 89
Are you gonna make another video of all theories, Sagacity School?
Maybe, maybe not. Oh by the way the reason I'm replying is because I animated this
@@gamerbros400 I was just saying options on part 2 of sinking theories or not.
The titanic hit an iceberg and started to sinking at 0:00 am the bow is underwater
What the heck is 0:00 am!?
@@gamerbros400ikr
@@gamerbros4000:00 AM is basically the first minute of the day, 12:00 AM
Sorry bruh
Why the La Hantise one Sanked so Fast and The funnels don't broke and It didn't split
The only mistake you have is im pretty sure the stern turned to the right. *if your facing the stern* but who knows I might be wrong.
james cameron theory is from 1995, not 1997
Yes but the theory is based on the 1997 movie not the 1995 animation. Notice how the second funnel falls a little late.
I personally believe how it sank in the titanic movies in 1997 or 1998 idk but yeah that’s how I believe it sank with the stern really high in the air the ship splits between the last and third funnel and the stern going up again and sitting there straight up then it goes down so yeah that’s how I believe it sank let me know how you think it sank
Your theory seems pretty accurate.
At 2:17 am she split
1:03 1997 split
The Mast Don't Fall In The Movie 0:32
Yeah it does, if you check out the side view scene after the bridge goes underwater, the mast is gone.
The bow wasnt lit
My 2024 teory the titanic split front of her 3rd funnel went water reach the base of the 3rd funnel the keel fails to hold the stern fell back with the 3rd funnel fell
At 1:00 am the frist funnel fell at 2:00 am the second funnel fell
Wrong, they fell just a minute apart
They fell less than a minute apart at 2:17 am and less than a minute before the breakup. Survivor statements indicate the two forward funnels fell simultaneously.
Sorry
вау круто!
Hi
You forgot 1943
I didn't include it because I found out it was made by nazis
oversized iceberg
i feel like the 4th funnel would collapse when the ship split
However that's innacurate. The 3rd funnel collapsed because stress from the breakup was right under it, and it collapsed. The 4th funnel didn't have as much stress. Th 4th funnel broke because the sinking was so fast after the breakup that the 4th funnel fell backwards as water pushed it aft.
@@gamerbros400you are correct. It collapsed when his theory said it did
The '97 movie kinda sucks comepared to antr
And who the fuck are you to have a theory??
Someone who studies every day about the titanic for about a year. So if I had a theory, I could share it with everyone so I could know if I'm researching right. By the way, I animated this.
@@gamerbros400 right so if you're a serious titanic expert, why not use your face and name instead of a weird animation and even weirder name?
He’s just hating because he couldn’t come up with one on his own
@@LSF17 nah.....I ain't gonna pretend I'm an expert after a few months reading and animation :)
Did you say the fuck ?!