Because of how the bow broke it back when it hit the sea floor and she folded the other way is why the bow can now never be raised in one solid piece. If we had the tech tools and manpower to go down there for it the bow would break into atleast 3 or 4 new segments
I just love the crows nest on the bow as it is sinking to the bottom of the ocean just how it snaps back. It’s pretty cool and I like how that animation was handled.
Slight correction but the thing that snapped back is actually called the fore mast or just "forward mast", the crow's nest is the little white platform on the mast where the lookouts saw the iceberg
But inaccurate. The 95 version uses the stern bob that was used in the film, although eyewitnesses who survived described that the stern never bobed, just slipped beneath the waves.
It is estimated she hit the floor at some 45 miles per hour. That's roughly double what her actually top speed was. Can you imagine the sound she made? 🙀😭💀
@@slyguythreeonetwonine3172Well if anyone manage to survive inside it, assuming a air bubble didn't pop by miracle, the shock would get them for good 😅. I wonder if the shock was audible from the surface...
You guys like to imagine terrible things. The sheer thought of the darkness of the ocean at that depth sends shivers down my spine. And yes I know it happened at night but still it's too frightening to even try to imagine
@@loicnasser1826you really think there could've been a person stuck in an air-bubble dropping to the bottom of the ocean with the ship, conscious?
Amazing video. Yet, knowing people were still alive inside the stern up to about 500 ft below the surface is just bone chilling. Knowing they succummed to the implosion is heart breaking. RIP to all those who perished that night and since.
And this happened in total darkness . I cannot imagine how horrific that was for the people who were still inside and clinging to the outside of Titanic as the ship broke in half. The people in the life boats dealt with a lot too. Imagine having to listen to people dying from the cold water.
@@ScientificEndevourOfTheMind yeah and maybe you can checkout Historic Travels video on what happened to the victims of titanic . He references a chart from the book On a Sea of Glass on survival time in different water temperatures . It’s really informative.
@@Firemarioflower No no that was a smaller part of the superstructure not the entire thing look at the wreck from the time you can see the stern superstructure is there
Wrong, she was used to help ventilate smoke out of Fireplaces, and other stuff too. Research needs to be done, but I guess it would be considered a dummy funnel still.
There’s a theory that A lot of big Air pockets were in the stern as it went down. Those air pockets imploded, which had a lot to do with the stern ripping apart as it went down because the implosion caused the structural integrity to weaken…
@@PixelGxming, an implosion caused by an extreme pressure difference. Ironically, the similar event that caused the Titan submersible to implode last year when it went on it's final voyage to visit the Titanic's remains. Imagine compressing a pocket of air to roughly 200 times it's original density, bearing in mind that stamping on a water bottle full of air doesn't even achieve 0.4% of that amount of pressure. Now imagine exposing that extremely pressurised pocket of air to the ambient pressure around you, the result will be similar to an explosion. That "bang" you heard is the inverse event, an implosion. When a pocket of low pressure air is suddenly exposed to a high pressure environment. Rather than air rushing out, the water rushes in and displaces the air which then goes to the surface.
1995 animation is very inaccurate, 2012 is also not very accurate but still it's closer to what really happened. The break up was at 20-30 degrees of incline instead of 45, and it was very slow, steady and smooth. According to testimonies from survivors who were on stern during break up, the ship **seemed** to drop a little and then rose up. It was so dark and such a soft breakage that a lot of people didn't even knew that the ship broke into halves.
Well the new and the most likely theory is from titanic honor and glory with the forward tower falling off and the 4th funnel not collapsing when it broke and in the 2012 the port list is too high it mostly sank on an even keel after the bridge went under
I appreciate this update. I've been wondering about the breaking up parts, because I remember the back of the ship is in far worse condition than the front.
I like how the new one shows only the forepeak flooding and finally the most forward upper decks flood once water reaches e deck. That is more accurate.
You can't really slow down a ship immeaditely, it would still hit the iceberg in high speed. Also, that would kill several people who had cabins on the bow, and then Murdoch would have been harassed by the press for the rest of his life. Either that, or the collision would jam the forward watertight doors if they were left open, causing the ship to sink.
@@HugoGHA no the ship maximum speed was 40kmph and ship is a 37kmph at that time when they notice iceberg I know that it's not easy to bring down ship speed rapidly but if they engage the reversing engine the speed may come under 30kmph easily with that speed if they hit iceberg directly may be some people lost their live but rest of the people have been survived thats my point
So say you were in that situation would you decide to hit an iceberg head on when it just popped up out of nowhere and scared you and the rest of the crew. Plus it would still kill a bunch of people as well. And ships aren’t cars they don’t take 2 seconds to slow down it’s a ship and it’s on the water so it takes a while to slow down
It's a tradition that order to turn right to starboard means turn left to port. It's based on a boat tiller where moving it to the right will turn the boat left.
Titanic hit on the Starboard side (right), due to them saying hard a Starboard, they had to turn the ship to the left (port) otherwise they're more likely to get the worst sinking if she hit the port side
its so sad to think about all the people rich or poor who had this experience… . i don’t know which fate is worse surviving this nightmare or dying in the cold, dark water
Sad truth is without her sinking, all the gaps in ocean voyage safety would not have been filled, Not much of a believer in fate but even I have to ask, was she supposed to go down?
I remember reading somewhere that the survivors on the life boats actually heard the ship crash on the ocean floor. I cannot even imagine what that would have sounded like.
The ship wasn't at 45 degrees angle when it broke but probably more around 20 degrees according to some physic simulations and it makes sense cause imagine the pressure applied on the boat at this angle it wouldn't resist
Pretty good animation but they got it wrong. The bow came in at an angle and dug itself into the sea floor at over 50 mph. That's why it's partially buried. The stern, once under water began to rotate at over 50 mph. It sort of spun out in the sea floor. They have now documented scarring on the sea floor showing this sideways sliding movement.
Titanic need here. The stern would’ve only got to about 20* before breaking, not 45*. This is why so many survivors swore it never broke. Ask your friend Mike Brady at Oceanliner Designs.
I absolutely love talking about the Titanic it's one of my favorite subjects next to the universe and of course dinosaurs i studied the Titanic for years it's sad but very interesting the eay the stern sank as a pose to the bow and the great loss of life it will remain my favorite subjects.
the only way that the 1995 one may be correct is the water density depending how much the water weighed making to be a 45 degree angle so it goes towering, and the north Atlantic is one of the densest ocean in the world so the 1995 may not be so obsolete
For me: Iceburg strike: 1995 Sinking/splitting: 2012 How the bow ended up at the bottom: 1995 How the stern imploded (possibly): 1995 If they combined everything here it would have probably bin a accurate sinking for me
They should brought the whole ship and bring them to the museum. They should have a memorial site for those who lost their lives on the worst day of there lives of April 14-15 1912.
With the state of the stern section, no way they could risk trying to raise Titanic as the same thing would likely happen to the bow section. And after being underwater for over a century, bacteria has caused it to deteriorate anyway. Plus the wreck is literally a grave for all who died that night. Best let it be.
They never said the Titanic was unsinkable. White Star Line (The company that built the ship) said “It is as unsinkable as we know how to make a ship” Which means they built the ship best they can.
They never said titanic was unsinkable. I explain this all the time, they said it was just a well-built ship and as unsinkable as they could make it, but people took it as it was unsinkable and it’s not possible to even make a ship unsinkable
That scenario never made sense to me. No ship would break the way it is depicted, regardless of the size, unless there was a metal structure underneath to make it balance and then break. However, if a ship like that breaks like an egg, then the rear would lift. It's relatively simple physics.
To be honest, the 1995 - 1997 theory has an high angle. Including Cameron’s new theory I guess. Edit: Dang bro the debris of the stern moving is smooth idk why
That water jet downblast thing is up there with the switch theory and fire theory in terms of stupidity. That's not how hydrodynamics work. At least not that that scale.
мне вот интересно а кто и с чего взял что именно так тонул титаник? тупо ИИ просчитал? может он утонул за 4-6 часов,может за час,может просто пошёл плашмя ко дну,может кормой,может его разорвало на 2 части уже в процессе погружения,всё что нам говорят-херня,никто ничего не знает,одни теории
nessuno dice che proprio vicinissimo al titanik cera la nave californian ... che a volutamente non intervenire perche il capitano si rifiutava in quanto cerano troppe persone e cera il rischio che affondasse anche lui ... ma in realta parole dette dal primo ufficiale che il capitano della californian dicesse anno scelto la compagnia sbagliata se lo meritano di affondare ... questo fa capire di quanta poca umanita esiste dentro di noi... soprattutto dentro gli americani poi ...... che erano invidiosi delle navi del inghilterra ....
Все-таки первый вариант затопления ''Титаника'' более правдоподобен. Т.к. очевидцы в основном описывают первый вариант затопления, разлома и вставания Титаника на дыбы подобно башне.
I wonder how they even came up with the first version. I know technology wasn’t great but I don’t think it’s possible for the stern to stand up at a 90 degree angle let alone the ship sinking without a list. Knowing James Cameron and his fascination with the titanic it’s just hard to overlook
Nobody knows how the stern sank after her lights went out then splits due to how dark it was. Hence there are multiple theories on how she sank. It is quite possible to bring the stern up to 90° angle, just need a lot of water and area to come in via potholes
@@DarkSpiderman03 I have recorded 19 testimonies that tell of how the stern floated freely and horizontally after the bow sank, and 30 testimonies of how steeply the stern rose before the final plunge. So there's quite a bit that is knowable. The inquiries questioned 150 people with 50,000 questions after the sinking, so it is one of the most documented catastrophes in history. There is remarkable alignment in the testimonies.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
I love the scraping of the 1995 Titanic animation
Same 😂
Same
Yeah it's kinda satisfying ngl
1997 buffoon
Yeah
Because of how the bow broke it back when it hit the sea floor and she folded the other way is why the bow can now never be raised in one solid piece. If we had the tech tools and manpower to go down there for it the bow would break into atleast 3 or 4 new segments
I just love the crows nest on the bow as it is sinking to the bottom of the ocean just how it snaps back. It’s pretty cool and I like how that animation was handled.
Slight correction but the thing that snapped back is actually called the fore mast or just "forward mast", the crow's nest is the little white platform on the mast where the lookouts saw the iceberg
Thr 1995 version looks way better. Sometimes old is gold
Yeah
Yah the 1995 one is actually really impressive given the age
But inaccurate. The 95 version uses the stern bob that was used in the film, although eyewitnesses who survived described that the stern never bobed, just slipped beneath the waves.
Yeah, but James Cameron himself wanted a more accurate depiction.
Thank you for that fine forensic analysis, Mr. Bodine. Of course, the experience of it was…..somewhat different…
It was the most erotic moment of my life
Titanic ensense animation
That's what kept going through my head, too!
Legit the first thing I thought about! I’m glad I wasn’t the only one
I came here for this comment.. well that and “she had her whole ass in the air.”
1995 one seemed much better
Why idl the stern scrap
but is probably less realistic
@@JoseNovaUltraI was thinking that!
yes
That is not how the Titanic sank
What I especially hate about the TITANIC wreck site is that it is too far below the surface. Does the ocean really need to be this deep?!
There's a program on TV called "Drain the Oceans". That's all we need to do to get a better look at the wreckage. Just call them up and ask.
Its the depth of an ocean..
@@Itzzmematthew2763- Indeed it is.
@@billvanek5570 yes
bro its natural💀
I find 3:09 quite sad. After a couple of hours stationary she finally picks up speed again and begins her last journey to the bottom of the Atlantic 😢
It is estimated she hit the floor at some 45 miles per hour.
That's roughly double what her actually top speed was.
Can you imagine the sound she made? 🙀😭💀
@@slyguythreeonetwonine3172Well if anyone manage to survive inside it, assuming a air bubble didn't pop by miracle, the shock would get them for good 😅. I wonder if the shock was audible from the surface...
You guys like to imagine terrible things. The sheer thought of the darkness of the ocean at that depth sends shivers down my spine. And yes I know it happened at night but still it's too frightening to even try to imagine
@@namespacestd131sameee😭😭
@@loicnasser1826you really think there could've been a person stuck in an air-bubble dropping to the bottom of the ocean with the ship, conscious?
1:17 "PUGHHHH BECHUUUUUA pretty cool huh?" 😄
"Thank you for that fine forensic analysis Mr. Bodine"
CGI was better in the 90’s it seems.
It isn't better. There is a clear technologic gap. Not to mention the 1995 animation budget was way, way higher
@@firebottle8402and it honestly pays off, that animation is incredible.
@@Coopdog0108 It is not. It sucks
@@firebottle8402 It is clearly better.... LOL why is the 2012 iceberg so weak that so many chunks break off and then sink??? The ice would float.
Amazing video. Yet, knowing people were still alive inside the stern up to about 500 ft below the surface is just bone chilling. Knowing they succummed to the implosion is heart breaking. RIP to all those who perished that night and since.
For real?? There were people still alive in air bubbles 😭😭😭
They were killed long ago by high pressure @@landscapefutures
And this happened in total darkness . I cannot imagine how horrific that was for the people who were still inside and clinging to the outside of Titanic as the ship broke in half. The people in the life boats dealt with a lot too. Imagine having to listen to people dying from the cold water.
@@jillionnae9466 then thirty minutes later it's quiet for an hour
@@ScientificEndevourOfTheMind yeah and maybe you can checkout Historic Travels video on what happened to the victims of titanic . He references a chart from the book On a Sea of Glass on survival time in different water temperatures . It’s really informative.
Funny how they thought the superstructure on the stern just ripped off in 1995 even though they saw the wreck and that wasn't the case.
What do you mean? It's exactly what happened
@@Firemarioflower No no that was a smaller part of the superstructure not the entire thing look at the wreck from the time you can see the stern superstructure is there
What is the superstructure?
@@alexv1190look it up.
@alexv1190 everything built on the deck
May all those who lost their lives in this horrible tragedy rest in peace. 😔
0:38 "so wat happens?? DZZKK she splits, rite down 2 the keel"
-Lewis bodine
And the stern falls back level
AND THATS A BIG ASS IM TALKING 20 MAYBE 30 THOUSAND TONS
Near the start you can see smoke coming out of the stern funnel. The stern funnel was just for show and was never used as a funnel
Wrong, she was used to help ventilate smoke out of Fireplaces, and other stuff too.
Research needs to be done, but I guess it would be considered a dummy funnel still.
3:24
The second half: *Hey, wait for me!*
:D
:D
:D
:D
Ruin chain
What an absolute tragedy. The devastation and destruction is mind blowing.
And I also love the break up scene
She was magnificent Mighty Ship of the RMS Titanic
It turns out she wasn’t that mighty after all…
Sad to see the Stern rip apart like that. So violent. Poor old girl.❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Poor very young Girl.
It was her Maiden Voyage.
Wtf it was a ship
@@sixbases6793 well excuse me because white star line called the titanic a girl and her sister ships
Wouldn’t really call her really old since it was her first and final maiden voyage.
3:31 Why was there a bang?
@ShipvsAnimation Thx
Good question but it came from the area where the electrical and engine rooms where
boilers
There’s a theory that A lot of big Air pockets were in the stern as it went down. Those air pockets imploded, which had a lot to do with the stern ripping apart as it went down because the implosion caused the structural integrity to weaken…
@@PixelGxming, an implosion caused by an extreme pressure difference.
Ironically, the similar event that caused the Titan submersible to implode last year when it went on it's final voyage to visit the Titanic's remains.
Imagine compressing a pocket of air to roughly 200 times it's original density, bearing in mind that stamping on a water bottle full of air doesn't even achieve 0.4% of that amount of pressure. Now imagine exposing that extremely pressurised pocket of air to the ambient pressure around you, the result will be similar to an explosion. That "bang" you heard is the inverse event, an implosion. When a pocket of low pressure air is suddenly exposed to a high pressure environment. Rather than air rushing out, the water rushes in and displaces the air which then goes to the surface.
3:24 i like the stern part
These kinds of videos are really cool!
The break up 0:38 1995 🥇
2:59 2012 🥈....
1995 animation is very inaccurate, 2012 is also not very accurate but still it's closer to what really happened. The break up was at 20-30 degrees of incline instead of 45, and it was very slow, steady and smooth. According to testimonies from survivors who were on stern during break up, the ship **seemed** to drop a little and then rose up. It was so dark and such a soft breakage that a lot of people didn't even knew that the ship broke into halves.
The irony is that neither of these are considered the most likely now
Wrong. The second scenario is very likely what happend.
Well the new and the most likely theory is from titanic honor and glory with the forward tower falling off and the 4th funnel not collapsing when it broke and in the 2012 the port list is too high it mostly sank on an even keel after the bridge went under
Good, but why does the broken ice sink?
Cameron film is made this video HOME COMPUTER in late 1995 Animation sinking
THE MIGHTY TITANIC
THERE SHE BLOWS CAPTAIN
And then suddenly everybody is gone and died
They died sick
Everybody is dead
I appreciate this update. I've been wondering about the breaking up parts, because I remember the back of the ship is in far worse condition than the front.
I like how the new one shows only the forepeak flooding and finally the most forward upper decks flood once water reaches e deck. That is more accurate.
If william murduch order only to slow down the speed and let the titanic hit the iceberg directly then the titanic would have been survived
You can't really slow down a ship immeaditely, it would still hit the iceberg in high speed. Also, that would kill several people who had cabins on the bow, and then Murdoch would have been harassed by the press for the rest of his life. Either that, or the collision would jam the forward watertight doors if they were left open, causing the ship to sink.
@@HugoGHA no the ship maximum speed was 40kmph and ship is a 37kmph at that time when they notice iceberg I know that it's not easy to bring down ship speed rapidly but if they engage the reversing engine the speed may come under 30kmph easily with that speed if they hit iceberg directly may be some people lost their live but rest of the people have been survived thats my point
@@SaiKumar-fb1xt Titanic wasnt even able of going that fast..
So say you were in that situation would you decide to hit an iceberg head on when it just popped up out of nowhere and scared you and the rest of the crew. Plus it would still kill a bunch of people as well. And ships aren’t cars they don’t take 2 seconds to slow down it’s a ship and it’s on the water so it takes a while to slow down
mangled bow and jammed WTB is just make the sinking worse than it was, she would be sinking so fast that's not even a single lifeboat can be launch
In the movie it was told to steer ship to starboard but the crew turned the wheel to port side. Which side did the ice berg hit?
RMS Titanic got hit by the iceberg on her starboard side.
It's a tradition that order to turn right to starboard means turn left to port. It's based on a boat tiller where moving it to the right will turn the boat left.
Titanic hit on the Starboard side (right), due to them saying hard a Starboard, they had to turn the ship to the left (port) otherwise they're more likely to get the worst sinking if she hit the port side
1:57 i like the details
Me too😊
Still cant believe that this actually happened and im now watching an animated version of it on my phone
Underrated comment
i can't believe how an 1995 animation beats an 2012 animation, being the 2012 was supposed to be WAY more good
It’s not as ‘good’ but it’s more accurate to the reality
@@RichieW90210 ay, i can agree on that. But i was meaning of the graphics
I mean, it looks incredible for 1995
The stern at that moment imploded
Why can no one in the comments speak coherent English?
Because we live in a simulation and they want to annoy us from time to time, friend.
@@LussypickerFonguetuck-m6zI just wonder what makes you believe we live in a simulation?
The first animation was in the movie Titanic 1997
So the ship still sinks in the 2017 animation ?
the 1st one is so accurate LMAO
I laughed when the chunks of ice dislodged from the impact started sinking in the new animation.
Whoopsy 🥴
I wonder how long the front part might have taken to hit the bottom of the ocean. Like once it went beneath.
its so sad to think about all the people rich or poor who had this experience… . i don’t know which fate is worse surviving this nightmare or dying in the cold, dark water
Botta bing, botta boom, thats what we’re looking for- James Cameron
Sad truth is without her sinking, all the gaps in ocean voyage safety would not have been filled,
Not much of a believer in fate but even I have to ask, was she supposed to go down?
Wow, the stern in the 1995 one got absolutely blended
Bada bing bada boom
I came to the comments specifically for this
How long would it have taken Titanic to hit the sea floor after going under the surface?
About 40-50 mins
I remember reading somewhere that the survivors on the life boats actually heard the ship crash on the ocean floor. I cannot even imagine what that would have sounded like.
@@mikewolverton7904 they actually most likely heard the stern implode
7-8 mins
3:32 and what’s happened?
what happened was an implosion
didnt parts of the titanic implode due to the underwater pressure?
3:13it look like the animation doesn't have a physich
everything pull up and come down cuz the bow put the water come to the sea surfacebut the funnle... it explote and still on the back with bow
3:34 That's where the door came from for Roz and Jack
True 😂
Spelt rose wrong
DAWSON, YOU DIDN'T FILE YOUR PAPERWORK ON TIME
The ship wasn't at 45 degrees angle when it broke but probably more around 20 degrees according to some physic simulations and it makes sense cause imagine the pressure applied on the boat at this angle it wouldn't resist
This isn't remastered. It just has sounds now.
Which is remastered
Awesome sound design
My step son thinks WW1 and 2 were not real but made up by our governments. spat my beer in his face dying of laughter. Gen z is cooked.
Apparently, at 1:59 some chunks of the iceberg like to ignore physics and just collapse in on themselves.
So if you were in a state room did you die instantly or you drowned?
Pretty good animation but they got it wrong. The bow came in at an angle and dug itself into the sea floor at over 50 mph. That's why it's partially buried. The stern, once under water began to rotate at over 50 mph. It sort of spun out in the sea floor. They have now documented scarring on the sea floor showing this sideways sliding movement.
Titanic need here. The stern would’ve only got to about 20* before breaking, not 45*. This is why so many survivors swore it never broke. Ask your friend Mike Brady at Oceanliner Designs.
The second animation that's how the ship actually sank actually breaking in half where the bow has 2 funnels and the stern has the other 2 funnles
Yah that one seemed much more realistic
Where are the four chimneys and where is second part
To be honest, I think that your first animation looked better because it wasn’t like sped up
Captain had all the water in the world and hit the only ice berg 💀
Neither of these animations show it but there was actually a MASSIVE ice field with hundreds of icebergs.
I absolutely love talking about the Titanic it's one of my favorite subjects next to the universe and of course dinosaurs i studied the Titanic for years it's sad but very interesting the eay the stern sank as a pose to the bow and the great loss of life it will remain my favorite subjects.
the only way that the 1995 one may be correct is the water density depending how much the water weighed making to be a 45 degree angle so it goes towering, and the north Atlantic is one of the densest ocean in the world so the 1995 may not be so obsolete
it really did reach 20ish degree angle but it looked 40 degrees from the boats
Ich vermisse die Titanic mit den vielen Menschen sehr 😭😭😭😭🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Good job!
Honestly, all the animations are good but I liked the first one the most, the one from 1995, yeah
Can’t imagine how scary the sound would have been when it smashes into the ocean floor 😮
weird that they still use the audio from 1995
They dont have audio. It was added by whoever edited it
For me:
Iceburg strike: 1995
Sinking/splitting: 2012
How the bow ended up at the bottom: 1995
How the stern imploded (possibly): 1995
If they combined everything here it would have probably bin a accurate sinking for me
They should brought the whole ship and bring them to the museum. They should have a memorial site for those who lost their lives on the worst day of there lives of April 14-15 1912.
With the state of the stern section, no way they could risk trying to raise Titanic as the same thing would likely happen to the bow section. And after being underwater for over a century, bacteria has caused it to deteriorate anyway. Plus the wreck is literally a grave for all who died that night. Best let it be.
Bada bing bada boom that’s exactly what we’re looking for
imagine someone was in some room that managed to not get flooded but was stuck in there, and travelled while the ship went underwater.
I think he would have died of the pressure at the bottom a long time ago
Самое лучшее аниме о трагедии Титаника! 👍
What about the other half
They said that the Tiantic was "unsinkable" but boy they were so wrong.
They never said the Titanic was unsinkable.
White Star Line (The company that built the ship) said “It is as unsinkable as we know how to make a ship” Which means they built the ship best they can.
@@ForceThanawin they also said not even god can sink this ship as what I heard
@@Questionable10 No, that is a fictional phrase.
They just said it was hard to sink
But the people started calling it unsinkable
They never said titanic was unsinkable. I explain this all the time, they said it was just a well-built ship and as unsinkable as they could make it, but people took it as it was unsinkable and it’s not possible to even make a ship unsinkable
And the two little crewmate in the crows nest said just like iceberg straight ahead
HELP I AM REGRESSING TO PAST HYPERFIXATIONS AAAA
3:12 i like the bridge part of titanic
I love this.
The 1995 Titanic Simulation is more better than the newer version
Oh hey I remember that first animation from the James Cameron movie lol
That scenario never made sense to me. No ship would break the way it is depicted, regardless of the size, unless there was a metal structure underneath to make it balance and then break. However, if a ship like that breaks like an egg, then the rear would lift. It's relatively simple physics.
Look great and from film 1997
А ophiuchus сними про Британик пж
To be honest, the 1995 - 1997 theory has an high angle. Including Cameron’s new theory I guess.
Edit: Dang bro the debris of the stern moving is smooth idk why
I think the 1995 Titanic animation is the better one.
That water jet downblast thing is up there with the switch theory and fire theory in terms of stupidity.
That's not how hydrodynamics work. At least not that that scale.
Is it just me or does the 1995 one look like it has a strange AI filter over it in some scenes making it look weird
мне вот интересно а кто и с чего взял что именно так тонул титаник? тупо ИИ просчитал? может он утонул за 4-6 часов,может за час,может просто пошёл плашмя ко дну,может кормой,может его разорвало на 2 части уже в процессе погружения,всё что нам говорят-херня,никто ничего не знает,одни теории
Survivor testemonies said that the ship sank in 2 hours and 40 mins and some even said they heard and saw the ship break
The 2017 one has to extreme of a list. A combo of the 2 is what happened
nessuno dice che proprio vicinissimo al titanik cera la nave californian ... che a volutamente non intervenire perche il capitano si rifiutava in quanto cerano troppe persone e cera il rischio che affondasse anche lui ... ma in realta parole dette dal primo ufficiale che il capitano della californian dicesse anno scelto la compagnia sbagliata se lo meritano di affondare ... questo fa capire di quanta poca umanita esiste dentro di noi... soprattutto dentro gli americani poi ...... che erano invidiosi delle navi del inghilterra ....
Software name😢😢???
Все-таки первый вариант затопления ''Титаника'' более правдоподобен. Т.к. очевидцы в основном описывают первый вариант затопления, разлома и вставания Титаника на дыбы подобно башне.
Главное, что наши не пострадали...
Such a cool event.
Damm...Why have the people screaming sounds.
1995-2012titanic🎉❤
I wonder how they even came up with the first version. I know technology wasn’t great but I don’t think it’s possible for the stern to stand up at a 90 degree angle let alone the ship sinking without a list. Knowing James Cameron and his fascination with the titanic it’s just hard to overlook
Nobody knows how the stern sank after her lights went out then splits due to how dark it was. Hence there are multiple theories on how she sank. It is quite possible to bring the stern up to 90° angle, just need a lot of water and area to come in via potholes
@@DarkSpiderman03 I have recorded 19 testimonies that tell of how the stern floated freely and horizontally after the bow sank, and 30 testimonies of how steeply the stern rose before the final plunge. So there's quite a bit that is knowable. The inquiries questioned 150 people with 50,000 questions after the sinking, so it is one of the most documented catastrophes in history. There is remarkable alignment in the testimonies.
@@billvanek5570
Can you share those testimony on youtube or somewhere else?