Estimating Flow Rate using the Float Method

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 дек 2016
  • A common but simple method for measuring flow rate through an open channel is the Float method. Although not as accurate as a measuring device such as a flume or a velocity probe, the float method can provide an educated estimate. Briefly put, this method involves measuring the surface velocity of the water with a floating object, and then multiplying this velocity by the width and average depth of the channel.
    "The accuracy of float methods are limited by many factors, including a lack of preciseness in the coefficients, too few stream segments being used, appreciable changes in stream depth along the test reach, oblique currents, wind forces, and experimental errors in measuring time and distances. Often, a number of people are required to perform this technique and make observations. The course of the floats is difficult to control, and they can be easily retarded by dragging on submerged debris and on the sides and bottom of the channel." (USBR)
    US Bureau of Reclamation document - www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferenc...
    See the calculator, instructions, and worksheet on our website at inmtn.com/float.
    We are a distributor for irrigation and weather monitoring supplies. Find us at inmtn.com.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 33

  • @AayushKumar-ci5pm
    @AayushKumar-ci5pm 16 дней назад

    Simple and correct explanation for understanding float meter method. Thank you, sir

  • @KakNa.05
    @KakNa.05 3 года назад +4

    Thanks for saving our bums for geography class with your clear explanation and steps. 10/10

  • @mehmetozalp8148
    @mehmetozalp8148 2 года назад +1

    Thanks for the simple and understandable explanation and application of discharge measurement

  • @varmavarma6663
    @varmavarma6663 3 года назад +1

    Perfect demonstration for this topic because, it is easy to understand perfectly and simply....

  • @cocoachanie
    @cocoachanie 5 лет назад +7

    I loved this. thank you for the clear demonstration

  • @mattdathew2794
    @mattdathew2794 2 года назад

    Thankyou very much .. most in depth I've found so far

  • @Bobby14221234
    @Bobby14221234 2 года назад +1

    This is good as it measures an actual flow - thanks

  • @yasirmahsud4129
    @yasirmahsud4129 2 месяца назад

    Simply perfect...

  • @gomezanzolajuansebastian2794
    @gomezanzolajuansebastian2794 4 года назад

    hello a question, I would like to know how is the right of the windlass elice, against the current or in favor of the current?

  • @juliethmosha8885
    @juliethmosha8885 2 года назад

    Nice explanation

  • @davidtechi6494
    @davidtechi6494 Год назад

    Thank you much love

  • @donaldpaivu6901
    @donaldpaivu6901 2 года назад

    Thanks very helpful.

  • @sireeshaajjarapu4057
    @sireeshaajjarapu4057 9 месяцев назад

    This is right time video for me thank u so much

  • @osamakh7062
    @osamakh7062 3 года назад

    Good job

  • @nithinhm1757
    @nithinhm1757 3 года назад +1

    Thanks a lot for doing this video🌟
    I have a small Doubt for the 0.85 roughness value. how will you actually calculate it on what basis

    • @intermountainenvironmental3304
      @intermountainenvironmental3304  3 года назад +2

      We like to use the .85 value based on our experience. You can also view a document here that is more specific based on channel depths.
      www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/mands/wmm/chap13_10.html

  • @abdussamadkhan5705
    @abdussamadkhan5705 11 месяцев назад

    Thanks

  • @donnyburns486
    @donnyburns486 7 месяцев назад

    Hi! I plan on doing this some time next year with an ourtdoor social group and would love to get ahold of the documents you had posted. The website is no longer up. Thanks!

  • @Kevin-rp4vs
    @Kevin-rp4vs 4 года назад +3

    Great video, but you should always stand downstream of the depth stick for accurate measurements.

  • @yolloy2372
    @yolloy2372 4 года назад

    Is surface speed same as underneath? Obviously not. But is it neglectable?

    • @ST-rj8iu
      @ST-rj8iu 3 месяца назад

      no. He knocked off 15% from the surface speed.

  • @rso823
    @rso823 Год назад

    Does any float go downstream at the same speed for example like a rubber duck or a peice of paper would? does mass matter

    • @rso823
      @rso823 Год назад

      Also wind speed

  • @724riff
    @724riff 9 месяцев назад

    So I'd like to ask. If a person put bolders let's say roughly 10 feet on each side of that exact spot how would it affect this whole equation.

    • @724riff
      @724riff 9 месяцев назад

      For example if that was 1000 gallons over the roughly 42 feet he stated and now it's a 1000 gallons over roughly 20 feet because of the boulders would it increase the water speed with tye same amount of water and make it more worthy of hydro electricity or not

  • @aldrinbantilan4457
    @aldrinbantilan4457 2 года назад

    what if it is a waterfalls?

  • @joshhanks744
    @joshhanks744 6 лет назад

    You can also use the Flow Probe as seen in this video.
    ruclips.net/video/jY9Jxe0N5jM/видео.html

  • @intermountainenvironmental3304
    @intermountainenvironmental3304  6 лет назад

    www.inmtn.com - we have many options for monitoring flow in rivers, streams, canals and pipes.

  • @atoz6057
    @atoz6057 4 года назад +1

    0.85 sir

  • @dr.muhammadmohsinwaqas4142
    @dr.muhammadmohsinwaqas4142 10 месяцев назад

    Why 0.85 for velocity adjustment

    • @AayushKumar-ci5pm
      @AayushKumar-ci5pm 16 дней назад

      As there some retardation on the bottom of channel for flowing of water . There is a difference in surface flow and bottom flow so , the hydrologist recommended to take the 85% for that thing