Yep, stabbed and beheaded lying face down at the entrance to her own home. This was no robbery or something, a robber would have taken more precautions to kill her inside the house, making it less obvious. The killer was furious at her personally, which again points to a jealous OJ.
@@louise_rose What??!! I still think Ron Goldman senior was the killer because he couldn't stomach the fact his son would get all that money in an inheritance.
I actually think his son did it. There are many facts that make it very plausible. I came up with that after seeing all the evidence. Way before this guy did.
@@abrahamofei1063 the evidence against him was/is “staggering”. Even Robert Kardashian (who defending OJ) said on his death bed thought he was. Saying: “I would’ve been okay with it if they had gotten him in the first trial.”
OJ had help in committing these murders. How could one man kill two people?? One of them would have gotten away. It was OJ and two other guys, one guy being Charlie and the other guy a lookout.
I saw him getting yelled at in Miami by a bunch of middle aged women in a restaurant yelling “killer, murderer, assassin….” He just smiled and said “good morning, good morning” as if it was nothing.
What was he supposed to do? If he got angry at that harassment, you would have said he's guilty because he's aggressive. Voices like yours are a cancer to society
One very minor correction: The White Bronco in the freeway “chase” actually belonged to Cowlings. He had a nearly identical one to OJ’s. The other Bronco had been impounded as evidence.
Like I said Nicole's broken watch would have been the tell tale sign that OJ could not have done it. Certainly the dried blood under her finger nails needed to point the needle to other directions. But they wanted a dramatized story line. Something epic.
I never heard an explanation for why OJ’s Bronco had a tarp and a shovel in back. It always left me thinking that there was probably a pre-dug hole somewhere up in the hills above Brentwood where Nicole’s body was intended to disappear. Ron Goldman showing up screwed up that plan.
I just read Marsha Clark’s book about the trial and the plastic in the SUV was told by industry reps to be standard issue in that make/model, it was a wheel cover.
Of course he killed her. An innocent man does not attempt to run,write a suicide note,and write a book saying how he would have killed her. Clear signs of a guilt filled guilty killer.
@@raysolorzano2938 Ron junior was what they call a gold digger like the Menendez brothers. So Ron senior saw it coming and snuffed him out before he got murdered for his will money.
@@nickyfurlano8531 hmm, That's a twist! So his father's grief was all an act then? Is that your belief also? Was he questioned concerning his whereabouts, investigated and or a suspect? I don't remember this ever coming up. Interesting twist I admit though.
It always reminded me of the Sherlock Holmes story Silver Blaze. "The key to the mystery, my dear Watson, was the strange behavior of the dog in the night. I don't understand. The dog did nothing in the night. Precisely!" Kato, the Simpson Akita dog (one of the world's best guard dogs) was right there. Had anyone other than his master attacked his mistress, he would have defended her with his life. Therefore it had to be OJ.
Ive watched an interview of a black female juror of the trial and when she was asked if her and other black jurors had voted not guilty in response to the beating of Rodney king, her reply was “yes”. Truly pathetic.
@dorothy What about Emmett Till? All white jury all the evidence and no guilty verdict. Injustice is injustice it has nothing to do with race. Horrible people are in every race don’t be a sheep.
You don't need to be there to know a person is guilty if there's so much DNA evidence proving that he was the perpetrator and the theory by the Defense That OJ was framed makes no sense Why would the detectives risk their careers and possible prison time for framing a man if they don't even know if the man has an alibi or not at The time of the Murder only an air head would fall for that
Hate to disagree with ya Matt, but I do not believe that oj would've been that hardcore of a man Sir? Everybody that knew the juice stated in his defense that OJ was a charming and caring individual, except for his temper with Nicole...So No, Oj was ruled for me when I heard the children were a asleep up stares...
@ericacharles5608 What a cogent, well constructed argument! Well thought out…engaging for the reader….inspiring yet not at all condescending despite the authors clear mastery of the topic!! It is with admiration and humility that stand here with a changed mind, and a hope that one day, I will be able to offer such eloquent retort.
I was coaching with a former Buffalo Bill defensive end, during the late 90's. He mentioned that OJ was very brutal in his treatment of the Rookies. Actions that would be out of line and borderline evil but he was allowed to get away with it because of his status on the team. When asked if he thought OJ could be guilty, he said ABSOLUTELY! FYI: innocent people don't jump on a plane in the middle of the night to turn and a fly back home unless you're trying to invent an alibi. You also don't take money, a disguise and your best friend to drive you "out of town" when the cops decide to charge you with the crime.
Coroner's report declared wounds on Goldman's hands were NOT defensive, but we're from falling and hitting the ground. After getting stabbed 17 times and having your head almost cut off, it's hard to stand.
You know, typically the only time I have 10k in cash, a gun, disguise, passport and emergency clothes is when I commit double homicides. Other than that, I rarely carry all those items at the same time
@@joelhague5515 It wouldn't have mattered, jurors have been pretty open about saying they were going with not guilty no matter what as "revenge" for the Rodney King incident.
Pretty straightforward. He was hanging out in the bushes, stalking the ex-wife and then saw some young, handsome dude coming up the walk. He freaked out and killed them both. He literally got away with murder, because he was a celebrity.
Not just because he was a celebrity, but a black celebrity. Race was 90% of the acquittal. Had it been Terry Bradshaw or Mike Ditka, they would have been convicted on half the evidence.
@@adambump5297 Incorrect. Many African Americans have been treated unfairly by our justice system because of the color of their skin. The difference with OJ is that he was a popular sport's figure that everyone liked, and he had the money to buy an excellent defense team - something many black Americans do not have. The issue is class, not the color of one's skin. There is a different justice system for those who have money as opposed to those who do not.
@@darlenegriffith6186 Yeah I know all that but the race thing was definitely a factor too because of many events that happened around the time like race riots which occurred after the senseless beating of a man named Rodney King by the LAPD. The Defense strategically used Law Enforcement Racism as a reason for the charges they used audio recordings of an LAPD Detective named Mark Fuhrman who used racial slurs against OJ over forties times in just one sitting and they were able to taint the evidence suggesting that it might've been planted by Mark because he was the first one to find it in the estate. Christopher Darden the Deputy Distract Attorney at that time said "It'll do one thing it'll upset the black jurors it will say whose side are you on 'the Man' or 'the Brothers'.". Speaking of which most people on that Jury were people of color eight African Americans, a Hispanic and two of mixed there was only one white guy so yeah with all that in mind I think that race also played a part in it too.
People who weren't around in the mid-90s and before have no idea how well-liked OJ was, and how at first, no one believed he'd done it. As the trial went on, it became obvious to pretty much everyone that he was guilty (there were a few strident black people who still defended him, but I dont think that even they REALLY thought he wasn't guilty). Initially though, everyone thought he'd been in Chicago when the murder occurred, and then he was questioned and released by LAPD--they wouldn't have released him if he was a viable suspect, right? Besides all that, he was a wealthy, well-spoken, Heisman Trophy winning NFL HoF-er and national broadcater; the longtime Hertz spokesman; and Nordberg, Frank Drebin's partner in the "Naked Gun" films. Everyone loved Nordberg--the role was small, but OJ was great in it. Why would a guy like that, a guy who seemingly had everything, go on a stab-crazy kill spree against the mother of his own children and some poor schmuck waiter? Maybe if it had looked like a professional hit, like the way people imagine the rich can make a call and get rid of a problem, there might have been immediate suspicions. But an out of control, deeply personal, hands-on murder? The OJ everyone thought they knew could never do that, and anyway, he was in Chicago. And it must be said, his history of domestic abuse was not known to the public at the time. Both the police and the media kept it under wraps in a way that probably seems incredible to people who don't remember how the world worked 30+ years ago. But celebrities back didn't have their careers ended for slapping their wives around, at least not celebrities about whom the media and local cops thought favorably. Then came the slow-speed White Bronco Chase, and some opinions began to shift; by the end of the trial pretty much everyone agreed he was guilty. And if it wasn't a universally accepted fact that OJ was a psycho killer before, it sure as hell was after he released that super creepy "If I Did It" book.
I was living just a few miles away at the time, working in film (In fact, I was actually in the jury pool for the case). When my roommate told me the news about Simpson's wife and another man being murdered. I said "Oh my gosh, is he o.k.?" Then he told me the blood trail led to his house, and I asked if he had also been attacked. I still couldn't take it in that he was a suspect.
Nicole was just 35 i so didn't realize just how young she was [i was just younger enough . . .] man, this whole case still really gets me you described what a big deal it was very well he really was an admired, loved, super handsome, talented athlete. a worthy superstar the shock was real
They jumped on Furman and his lying about his past as proof of Simpson’s innocence.🤷♀️When it was also Furman who turned his back on Nicole being beaten, when he was one of the cops called to a ‘Domestic’.
Other evidence not listed here. 1) A woman driver at an intersection halfway between Nicole's house & OJ's house reported almost being struck in the intersection by a speeding white Bronco w/its headlights turned off around 10:30. 2) At about 10:40 someone sneaking around behind the guest house on Simpson's property ran into an air conditioning support bracket so hard it violently shook the wall and startled the occupant inside, and then, 3) moments later the limo driver who was waiting to take Simpson to the airport saw Simpson appear from around the side of his house and go inside the front door, when just minutes earlier the limo driver rang the front doorbell and no one answered. After seeing Simpson go inside he went back & rang the doorbell again & Simpson answered the door.
1. was never presented at trial, I believe because she sold her story to the press and the prosecution declined to introduce it. The prosecution also failed to introduce OJs statement the next day where he clearly lied about a couple of things, as well as his near confession in a letter and everything about the Bronco chase including his disguises.
#2, the limo driver said he saw someone with flashlight on coming from side of house, this he later learnt was Kato. Limo driver said when he recognized a figure walk onto front door, the driver couldn't tell if the figure was coming from side of house or front side from the other entrance. #1, the lady in highway sold her story to newspaper
@@boerandemo7766 Incorrect, there was no flashlight and the limo driver specifically said the person he saw had O.J. Simpson's build and walked in the front door from the side of the house. Also, selling the story doesn't make it untrue. google "What did limo driver Allan Park see"
Allen Park said the house was dark when he rang multiple times, and when the shadowy figure went in, the lights turned on and OJ answered the phone saying he fell asleep. Hmm Jill Shively had no idea about the timeline when she submitted her story to Marcia Clark the following day of the murders. It coincided perfectly with the evidences timeline. Sure she may have sold her story for money, but it doesn't mean it didn't happen There was only one pair of shoe imprints at the crime scene, and they were Bruno Magli. Only OJ would have had those shoes
Remember: OJ didn’t do it. And even wrote a book about if HE DID IT, with details of the murders. Plus gave an interview for how hypothetically the murders happened. Super innocent as we can see.
@adeleon24, Of course he did it. He was high on cocaine and there were only one set of shoe prints going from one victim to the other and they were Bruno Mali shoes and they were Oj's shoes and his size. All the evidence proved it.
@@owynrobinson7790 He didn’t even write the book. Just look into things before you go along with what everybody else is saying, I have learned to do that. If everyone is saying something similar, it’s most likely BS.
The moment they said not guilty, the look on oj was not one of relief but the unmistakable look of ‘we pulled it off!” Absolutely disgusting piece of flesh💩
Judge Ito played a huge, huge role in the outcome. He boxed the Prosecution in numerous times by ruling all sorts of evidence against Simpson as inadmissible. A lot of information known to the general public was not allowed to be presented by the Prosecution or considered in jury's deliberations due to Judge Ito's rulings. The best book to read on that trial is "Outrage: The Five Reasons OJ Simpson Got Away with Murder" by Vincent Bugliosi.
Watch the interview he did where he explains how he 'hypothetically' did it. Its truly chilling. He even reveals how Ron tried to do some karate move to defend himself. Scary.
scariest part is him laughing at times during that. the big giveaway was him saying "i dont recall." to her questions, no need to recall a hypothetical.
There’s an interview with some jurors that said that no matter what, they were going to acquit OJ for revenge for the Rodney King incident. So, let a murder of two go free because another man was beaten (and lived).
@@andref9663it doesn’t because he made it up. you don’t have to think hard to know who he’s trying to protect but people will ignore that because they want him to be the killer so bad.
really now, back then i had a pair of suade leather gloves, shoveled the snow got them soaking wet (all the way through) guess what they DIDN`T shrink.
Why do people still defend a cold blooded killer of two innocent people. He couldn’t get his leather gloves on because they were soaked in blood and leather shrinks when wet. And he still breaths and laughing still over his not guilty outcome. Basterd got away with murder in the first degree. 😢
I said the same thing, when leather gets wet and dries, it shrinks if it's 100% real leather. I've had to stretch more than one pair of leather shoes that got wet.
O.J. did it. Period. The judgement was influenced by the fact that Los Angeles was still recovering from the riots a few years earlier. The City Government didn't want another one , which they would've gotten for sure. The jury was tainted by this fact. I lived there during the riots and during the O.J. trial. It was obvious that he was gonna walk.
Without OJ being a celebrity, no one ever would've heard of Fuhrman's tapes; prosecution should've brought forth Fuhrman stating "I may have said stuff 2 decades ago, but I've learned and become a better person since then. Fuhrman was a very good detective. Evidence brought forth in the later civil trial was just more damning evidence that OJ did it. Prosecution was arrogant too. Had OJ not been a celebrity, this would've been a 2-week trial or less.
Hell, I remember black women saying Nicole got what ‘was coming to her for marrying a black man!’ THAT was the atmosphere at the time. The suitcase that OJ brought back from Chicago, it’s ON FILM that Robert Kardashian picking it up and leaving, renewed his law license.
@@judywright4241 and the fact that there were many black women on the jury, who would never convict a black man of killing a white women, because of their hatred of white women. I heard black women saying that "Nicole deserved it." They also knew he was guilty as hell, said so, and were glad that he got off.
His lawyers told him to quit taking his arthritis medicine before the trial because they knew it would make his joints swell. Particularly his hands would swell since they knew he left his gloves there.
@@davidaltman8831 His lawyers told him to quit talking his arthritis medication weeks before the trial even started incase the prosecution asked him to put on the glove.
@@OUTTA-TYME88 ~ Yup, when leather gets wet, regardless of with what, it shrinks. People either don't know that in this case, or don't care and ignored it...
Ha, ha, absolutely !! If you haven’t seen it, search for it right here on RUclips. Norm & OJ. No matter how many times I listen to Norm make those wisecracks, they still make me laugh my ass off. He was relentless week after week.
Meh. Brian Heiss's "O.J Simpson fact or Fiction " is the best one. And it makes the idiot know ut all look silly on here. The facts in the videos show that it was impossible Simpson to have done it. Just the facts in the videos. Not any opinions or bias. Well worth watching. I've been to that condo. No way in could one person have done that on that street, inside the condo on that quiet night, without being heard. There had to be at least two people there whom were brutal, but quick. Even the same guy whom Simpson was charged for breaking into his place, said years ago, that Simpson told him one day that Nicole asked him for 30 grand. Simpson asked her, what for. Her reply was. I owe a drug dealer some money. Simpson told her no. That same guy, to this day said that he believed Nicole was killed over a bad drug deal. That story that Simpson told him was years before the murders.
@@ibg1049 Because most people, like your teacher, know none of the facts of the case. They only know the skewed narrative that the media fed them. The verdict did not surprise those that actually followed the case in its entirety.
A BIASED jury. A few of them even publicly admitted that they didn't care what evidence there was against OJ, they went in already having decided they would acquit to 'get back' at the system for the Rodney King acquittals. The one white juror came out and said that all 8 of the black jurors bullied the rest into a not-guilty verdict during deliberations instead of a hung-jury to ensure double-jeopardy attached and they couldn't retry OJ with a non-biased jury.
People who believe he's not guilty have looked into the actual case and researched the supposed "evidence". Media can twist the truth and hide the details to prove a narrative. Motive: They were broken up and OJ had a girlfriend. Why that night of all nights when the kids are there? Why drive a vehicle everyone knows you own? His ex-wife said he never laid a hand on her. Blood evidence: OJ's blood was only found after he willingly gave a sample. The entirety of said "blood" evidence were droplets that would fit on a pinky nail. It also contained EDTA a known blood anti-coagulant used when collecting blood samples. Evidence tampering: They had one of the lead detectives on tape willingly describing how they plant evidence to bolster cases all while using racial slurs. Another detective admitted to driving around with blood evidence. (Occam's razor huh?) Unusual circumstances: They had OJ examined and he had no evidence of bruises consistent with a fight. Just a cut on his finger, a cut not replicated on either glove found. Goldman had defensive wounds that showed he fought for his life before he died. They tested the pipes in OJ's house and there's no evidence of blood at all. Forensics show that the way Nicole was killed, the assailant would have been covered in blood. I could go on and on, but you get the point. Have you ever seen a casual media outlet report this stuff? Of course not, because they have a narrative they want to put out. I'm no OJ fan, I think he's a dirt bag, I think the whole lot of them were drug addled sexual deviants. My point being, I could believe he had something to do with what happened, but I'll never believe he killed them both and somehow got rid of his bloody clothes and the weapon, got cleaned up, all in time to make his flight.
Well the court said he was not guilty. That’s like saying “I can’t believe people really think George Zimmerman is not guilty.” They said he was not guilty.
@@grumpent "The court" said no such thing. A group of biased black jurors declared the State of California hadn't proved its case, which was ridiculous and scandalous.
@@marktrain9498 what does it say on the tapes of the trial and from a quick google search ? “Not guilty” you can have all the opinions you want of the case but it’s facts that it states he is not guilty. That’s what counts and matters in the court of law.
The bloody shoe print left at the murder scene was from an expensive uncommon shoe in size 12 made by Bruno Magli. Simpson said he would never wear such ugly shoes so it couldn't have been his. Then a proto showed up with Simpson crossing a football field years before wearing Bruno Magli shoes.
Tom Lange was one of the detectives, not a supportive neighbor. The picture they showed was definitely the detective, I remember him from watching the trial on TV.
@@Jim.Jim.32 Could have been her Asian pornstar neighbor, Hung Far Low Wang. He was known to whack his victims unconscious with his rather large tool then go to work slicing and dicing.
@@simonbelmont65 We will never know, but a fair assumption was the 3 men seen arguing with Nicole an hour before the murders. FBI believed the target was Faye Resnik, Nicoles roommate who had skipped town 2 days before the murders. .
Everyone inside the medical community know what OJ did to make sure those gloves would not fit in court. Because of his football career his hands had arthritis and he was taking anti inflammatory medication which reduce the swelling caused by this condition. He stopped his medication 1 mth before he knew he would have to try gloves on in court. His hands swelled up and with the rubber gloves on under those leather gloves also hindered the gloves for fitting. He absolutely did these murders and those gloves would have fit if he was still on the prescribed medication. The prosecution dropped the ball not checking medications he was prescribed.
He stalked her. He watched her being romantic with another man. He confronted her. She showed up at her door with a knife in her hand. His psychopathic anger took over. He over took her. The knife cut his knuckle. He proceeded to, in a rage, stab her to the point of decapitation. Goldman showed up, he was overpowered by OJ. There were defensive wounds on Goldman's hands. OJ had Nicole's blood on his socks, OJ bleed from the knuckle, he Stepped in Goldman's blood leaving his shoe print. Blood was found in the Bronco, his socks, and his house. He got home and bagged up his clothes, shoes and the knife. He trashed the bag on his way to the airport.
The bloody shoe prints that were left at the scene of the crime,, were Bruno Magli Italian shoes... OJ Simpson was quoted as saying """ I wouldn't wear those ugly ass shoes""" a keen eyed journalist uncovered a picture of him wearing those Bruno Magli shoes in an unrelated photo shoot.
It isn't what you know it's what you can prove in court. The DA's were completely inept. Although in its early stages DNA evidence was available thru the FBI.
@@wtfj4462 How do you know what the commenter saw or didn't see?. I watched the case unfold on tv... He is guilty. It's pretty obvious that YOU didn't watch the trial.
I believe he did it. No doubt. But for some reason, I don’t believe he was alone. Who the other person was, or why I think that, I don’t know. I just can’t get it out my head that I believe someone else was there.
That’s interesting that you should say that because I was thinking the same thing. It’s takes a lot of energy to take on two people and the aftermath was savage, like a unhuman person, definitely not human to me.
They were ambushed separately. Nicole first from behind, then Goldman was corned in a gated garden space because he had witnessed the attack on Nicole and was rushing to defend her. OJ was much bigger than Goldman.
Of course, he did it! Everyone knew he did it, even the jury knew. The prosecution made some big mistakes and Cochran did what he always did. Judge Ito went easy on the defense and very hard on the prosecution. I'm sure he wanted to avoid a challenge to his rulings, but he went too far IMO. It didn't matter, because the jury was determined to get revenge for Rodney King. It's called Jury Nullification and it's wrong, but good luck proving that. Years later, juror Carrie Bess admitted to it knowing that nothing could be done. I do understand that, but I never thought OJ was the guy who should benefit. It's infuriating that race became such a large part of the case when it had no place in what happened. In reality, it was a DV case that ended in death. They happen every day, multiple times, in every walk of life. Rich, poor, famous, it doesn't matter.
What likely happened?? Erm, so a jealous and abusive ex-husband murdered his wife and her lover. This is probably the most famous miscarriage of justice in modern history. He so obviously murdered them that I find it ridiculous having to say it.
What everyone seems to forget O.J. had just completed a movie which has never been released were real Navy Sea'sl had gave him lessons on how to kill with a knife. Wasn't even brought up in court.
Correct, Bullfrog . 📺 It was a NBC pilot. OJ would of been a Magnum PI type SEAL officer who ran around fighting crimes, kissing sexy women 😘 . OJ was taught how to use a Ka Bar. 🔪
What absolutely happened is he got away with it due to a racist black jury that was NOT a jury of his peers. I’m a Bills fan and he used to be my favorite player. Now I want him removed from the “wall of shame “!
@@donovans6472 Mark Furhman was so racist that he used his racist powers to cut OJ with a knife and plant his DNA all over the crime scene. He also made OJ assault his wife several times prior to that with racism mind control powers and made him commit armed robbery in a casino years after the fact. Yeah, sounds legit. Maybe OJ is just a filthy cold blooded killer and you're delulu.
@@giii7599 happy to know I'm being heard, because we're still getting the Lindberg baby case wrong too. This video glosses over just how convincing and damning the evidence against Jason is, while still explaining all the other accepted "facts" about the case. So what if evidence was obtained illegally? Let's see...son works as a chef, with access to knives, had a history documented violence, his time card for that night is clearly not right, a eyewitness who saw him there passed a lie detector test...let's not forget after the car chase it was Jason who approached the Bronco with the world watching and guns aimed. This video literally relies on an illusory "Occam's razor" theory to support its theory....that's like saying God is real because Christ died for your sins. HUH?!?
The son was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon…he attacked his girl friend with a knife. He had several other arrests for assault. He didn’t like his step mom and had documented long term drug abuse and mental health issues. He might not be guilty of the murder, but he should have been investigated closer. He was never even interviewed. LAPD incompetence.
Simpson acted guilty from the start. The Bronco chase through the streets of L.A.?? And an innocent man would have taken the stand without hesitation to defend himself to the world. it’s really as simple as that. Guilty as hell.
i could tell you didn't do your homework on the case because if you did you would know that he wanted to take the stand..but his lawyers decided that he didn't need to
The trial was a disaster...wrong venue and a simple minded jury, poor prosecuting attorneys who didn't have the heart for the job, a weak minded judge, cameras in the courtroom, etc. The DA gave away the trial from day one.
The judge did not have the backbone needed for a case like this, true, but the prosecution was pouring their heart and souls into it, working around the clock for months on end, and on a breakneck time table because the defense used strategies to hurry everything up, and with witnesses who often wouldn’t cooperate because they were intimated by Simpson’s celebrity status.
@concerned1144 u should be concerned about what God is going to do with u sinner. One sinner is worried about another sinner. On judgment u will have your own problems.
This whole story make me physically ill. The fact he got off because of a Race issue and his Money is just appalling!! Biggest injustice ever and anyone affiliated with getting him off should be in jail or shot!!
This wasn't about lynching it was about a narcissistic jealous ex husband killing 2 people and disgusting defence attorneys using the race card to get him off! Simpson doesn't have a conscience! Black people have certainly suffered much injustice but Nicole and Ron suffered injustice by the so called criminal justice system by setting the criminal free!
O.J.'s best defense was his name...not the lawyers he used. The only person who knows if he did it or not was himself. Money talks and BS walks. I believe he was guilty.
Norman Pardo is a PI who investigated this for over 20 years. His movie who killed Nicole he brings receipts with his conclusions. He explains every piece of evidence unlike the prosecution or anyone who’s really made a doc about this. He shows how oj went there with glen rogers and he goes on to explain the blood evidence as well as the discrepancy that they both died an hour apart. He even explains why this all happened. He’s the only person to explain ALL the evidence not just part of it.
another theory i heard back in the day, as to why OJ didnt have any marks on him from fighting goldman was that he was wearing the wetsuit from navy seals or whatever the title from his last (and as far as i know unreleased) film was
OJ did a NBC pilot film called Bullfrog ...🐸 a Magnum PI type action show where he played a SE Asia veteran, SEALs UDT. ⚓️ Simpson used a Ka Bar 🔪 in 2 scenes. He was taught by SOF veterans.
@@DavidLLambertmobile Lol, yeah right. That's why there's drops of blood leading down the sidewalk to the back gate at Nicoles, and, blood drops at the Simpson residence in the driveway and front entrance.
I have utmost sympathy for Black people's rage for unjust treatment based on race because that is the essence of wrong . However celebrating OJ being found not guilty as a victory for Blacks was , sadly , terribly misplaced and undermines the point of truth and justice for all , regardless of race,color or creed
Also they’d gotten a duplicate pair from the manufacturer to use instead and it was discovered at the last minute they were the wrong size. Defense argued to let him try on the originals and judge allowed it.
Let's face it Simpson was guilty, he wasn't prosecuted because he was a black superstar athlete! Also, this incident happened shortly after thugs pillaged the streets of LA because of the Rodney King verdict
@tcollier5460 "Let's face it Simpson was guilty, he wasn't prosecuted because he was a black superstar athlete!" Not true. OJ was prosecuted, as he was tried in a court of law.
@@reginaldsmith6949 Simpson was tried, but never prosecuted! Do you remember Reggie Denny, he was the innocent man ripped out of his truck and ambushed by a bunch of thugs and left to die in the riots! Meanwhile, that creep was found not guilty!
@@tcollier5460 Did you mean convicted instead of prosecuted? I get the anguish one would experience in a case like this, but the state failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
OJ walked because Judge Ito was bribed. He threw out evidence and testimony the jury was not allowed to consider that would have got OJ. He to this day still refuses to talk about the trial. Guilty conscience.
Remember when OJ wrote that book If i did it? When he was interviewed he said that Ron Goldman jumped into a karate stance? Thats a strange detail to put in a hypothetical. Why would you make that small detail?
any person who writes a book called If I Did it? did it. that's like the serial killer dude who proclaimed he saw the murders in his dream acting all mentally challenged. "i dreamed..." So glad the one guy/cellmate got him on tape...make sure he stays where he is at.
OJ’s son being the killer is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. He did it in a fit of jealous rage after she didn’t attend a family dinner he organized? Yea right.
He literally wrote what happened in a book. Seriously! PPL. C'mon. He was a violent abusive possessive and she was absolutely terrified of him. Oh and BTW so effing guilty he wrote it in a book and published it.
Who do you think killed 3 of dons friends during and Fter the trial. They worked at the same restRaunt. They were drug dealers. Waiters living like millionaires. AlwYsnpay your debts
I believe oj is guilty but how in the world with all that blood did he get in his truck and barley get it on anything. He woulda been in a panic probably ably very nervous and moving around a lot. His clothes woulda been soaked in blood like the gloves , yet there were only tiny traces of blood in the car. I just think there shoulda been WAY more blood than what they supposedly found.
If he were standing behind or over, he would’nt necessarily have had a lot of blood on him. Also the criminalist Dennis Fung who processed the scene for blood saw the sweatshirt but didn’t have it tested because he didn’t “see” blood on the dark fabric-big mistake.
The glove issue was moot to the jury. He tried on a new pair of the same gloves that fit perfectly later in the trial. The media picked and chose what their audience would see regarding this case. The main reason he was acquitted was mark furhman pleading the 5th amendment when he was asked if he planted evidence in this case. That’s rarely ever shown on docs like these.
@@VintageVera Plus Simpson wore plastic gloves underneath. And you could see he was expanding his fingers while pulling on the gloves to give the impression that they didn't fit.
you are breezing over the facts and leaving out many things. the jury only took 4 hours to make a not guilty verdict and they sat through the trial for 11 months! he did not have a motive the night of the killing! he did not have time to do it the night of the killing and he didnt show any evidence of a man that just killed two people when he was signing autographs in the air port and talking to people on the plane including talking to the pilot. this was a rush to judgement and no other people were ever investigated. The thought by the police from the start was OJ did it and they never looked any other way!
I happened to be watching TV when the chase happened. At the time there had never been something like that live on TV but today it's a pretty normal thing
I tended to think others were involved in the murders. But then I was thoroughly disgusted by O.J.'s nasty book about how he would have done it...if he did it....but he didn't. It was so cold and there was no feeling for Nicole. Therefore I have no feelings for him about guilt, innocence or anything else. He apparently did not care about Nicole or what happened to her and Ron Goldman.
How could u think that!? He was a well known wife abuser with a mountain of evidence against him. Fleeing the scene with a disguise and bleeding! Lol. Amazing.
Though I can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that what I'm about to tell you is true, you'll just have to believe me that it is. Months before the verdict, someone I knew who worked in law enforcement and took his job very seriously, said something that stunned me at first beings he was so damn honorable. He said "The best justice will be if OJ gets acquitted." Huh? I said "You don't think he did it?" "No, I'm totally convinced he did it." "Where are you coming from?" He said "Over half of his life he has been idolized. What do you think will happen if he gets acquitted? Is it safe to think everybody out there will hate him?" I said yes. He said "You got to trust me. For that guy to go out there and not be idolized, that's worse then jail. If you REALLY want to punish that guy, turn him loose and let everybody out there hate him. That would be a way better punishment." Well, I can't say I agreed. That is until one year after the verdict. They were doing anniversary type of reports on the news and nearly all had a "what OJ is doing now" part of the story. If you look very carefully, you'll see he aged way worse in that one year then any time he was in jail. Then of course it all made sense what he said. OJ really thought that when it was over, it would be like nothing happened - because he was OJ Simpson. Didn't turn out that way obviously. So in a weird way, maybe it was better for him to be acquitted. What gets me is that it's already been 28 years since the verdict and he is still alive - I thought for sure his heart would have given out by now. Hmmm.
I believe you. What the law enforcement person made sense. OJ may have been a hero in jail, but is a pariah on the outside. Most American prisons are a joke. I read Scott Peterson eats great meals and plays basketball all day.
Nicole’s friend Brent Cantor was murdered in a similar fashion only months before. Brent, Nicole, and Ron were all involved in the drug trade. OJ had cutoff Nicole financially, and Nicole wanted to go into the restaurant business to maintain her standard of living over the long term. In order to raise funds, she went into the drug trade. Nicole, Brent, and Ron were just about decapitated which was a standard assassination method in the drug trade. Other waiters from the Mezzaluna were involved in the drug trade including Michael Nigg who had transferred from the Mezzaluna’s Aspen restaurant and had been selling drugs to the wealthy people there. Michael Nigg was assassinated in broad daylight after the OJ trial.
They don't want to hear THOSE facts, though - they want OJ to be guilty so bad. This was about dope. OJ had moved on and was with another woman when this happened. Nicole was trying to get back with HIM. The timeline makes no sense. The glove was too small, and was planted. All the cops involved were also involved in the Rampart case that set hundreds of inmates free because of... planted evidence. Supposedly, the glove didn't fit because OJ was told to not take his arthritis medication ( which isn't true, they came up with him trying on the glove in the moment, so he wouldn't have known NOT to take his medication). So an arthritic former NFL player, having never killed before, is just supposed to be able to kill two people, not get any blood on him, and catch a flight without being nervous or agitated (he was around a bunch of folks in the airport and on the plane, and had to keep asking what happened on the flight back, and didn't know there were two people killed - he just thought it was Nicole that had died). Either OJ is the greatest killer of all time, or he didn't do it.
This topic you talk about was never even considered during the investigation. They just thought Oj did it because Mr Goldman was probably seeing her was the cause of rage. once you get a moniker attached to your name its hard to shake it.
Kato admitted he didn’t tell everything because he was afraid of OJ and was also living there free. He moved to Europe before stating he believed OJ did it.
They were stabbed to death? They were far more than stabbed to death. Nicole was damn near beheaded
Yep, stabbed and beheaded lying face down at the entrance to her own home. This was no robbery or something, a robber would have taken more precautions to kill her inside the house, making it less obvious. The killer was furious at her personally, which again points to a jealous OJ.
well, he was an athlete.
I hope someday they catch the killer. Sounds like some crazed lunatic from the funny farm must have done it. Tjose are the thoughest ones to find.
@@parkerbohnn The killer has already been caught, though he hasn't served time for this particular double murder.
@@louise_rose What??!! I still think Ron Goldman senior was the killer because he couldn't stomach the fact his son would get all that money in an inheritance.
I remember after all this went down. O.J. vowed to search for Nicole and Ron's killer on every golf course in America.
and He vowed He would not stop until the Guiity white Rebublican was found!!!!
Maybe he was with Trump
@@duanesudler4787 maybe your Mother was?..
He chased someone into the third hole but, darn it, he got away .
He and Scott Peterson were always looking for the real killers of their wives.
Yeah he did it. Good lord. People still defending him are beyond obtuse.
I actually think his son did it. There are many facts that make it very plausible. I came up with that after seeing all the evidence. Way before this guy did.
Andy Dufrane 😂 that’s where I first heard that word
Provide proof beyond all reasonable doubt. Mere suspicion is not enough.
@@abrahamofei1063 the evidence against him was/is “staggering”.
Even Robert Kardashian (who defending OJ) said on his death bed thought he was. Saying:
“I would’ve been okay with it if they had gotten him in the first trial.”
OJ had help in committing these murders. How could one man kill two people?? One of them would have gotten away. It was OJ and two other guys, one guy being Charlie and the other guy a lookout.
I saw him getting yelled at in Miami by a bunch of middle aged women in a restaurant yelling “killer, murderer, assassin….” He just smiled and said “good morning, good morning” as if it was nothing.
Monk mode lol
He knows what he is.
What was he supposed to do? If he got angry at that harassment, you would have said he's guilty because he's aggressive. Voices like yours are a cancer to society
Good on him for being so gracious. Why would those women harass a guy just because he's famous?
@@chesscomsupport8689 because he brutally murdered 2 people
One very minor correction: The White Bronco in the freeway “chase” actually belonged to Cowlings. He had a nearly identical one to OJ’s. The other Bronco had been impounded as evidence.
Everyone forgets AC
Kato also drove the white bronco once in a while.
@@edalexander6155 OJ's Bronco. A.K.A. the murder vehicle
So Maby Kato took OJ s white Bronco over to Nicole's. While the Juice was taken a nap after they got back from Micky Deees. 😆 lol
Like I said Nicole's broken watch would have been the tell tale sign that OJ could not have done it. Certainly the dried blood under her finger nails needed to point the needle to other directions. But they wanted a dramatized story line. Something epic.
I never heard an explanation for why OJ’s Bronco had a tarp and a shovel in back. It always left me thinking that there was probably a pre-dug hole somewhere up in the hills above Brentwood where Nicole’s body was intended to disappear. Ron Goldman showing up screwed up that plan.
Jungle Fever kills again
All broncos came with a shovel and a tarp in an suv is hardly unusual
What else would oj be doing with a shovel and a tarp?
I just read Marsha Clark’s book about the trial and the plastic in the SUV was told by industry reps to be standard issue in that make/model, it was a wheel cover.
Possibly preparing to go clam digging in Spain.
Of course he killed her. An innocent man does not attempt to run,write a suicide note,and write a book saying how he would have killed her. Clear signs of a guilt filled guilty killer.
My theory is it was Ron Goldman senior who killed the both of them. I still think he should be put on trial.
@@nickyfurlano8531 how did you come to that conclusion? Interesting to say the least!
@@raysolorzano2938 Ron junior was what they call a gold digger like the Menendez brothers. So Ron senior saw it coming and snuffed him out before he got murdered for his will money.
@@nickyfurlano8531 hmm, That's a twist! So his father's grief was all an act then? Is that your belief also? Was he questioned concerning his whereabouts, investigated and or a suspect? I don't remember this ever coming up. Interesting twist I admit though.
So why was he found innocent
It always reminded me of the Sherlock Holmes story Silver Blaze. "The key to the mystery, my dear Watson, was the strange behavior of the dog in the night. I don't understand. The dog did nothing in the night. Precisely!" Kato, the Simpson Akita dog (one of the world's best guard dogs) was right there. Had anyone other than his master attacked his mistress, he would have defended her with his life. Therefore it had to be OJ.
You just solved the case. Well done
I’ve been saying the same thing since day one.
There are other people that the dog wouldn't attack... there are other suspects.
@@Peter24601 Their little kids? Grandparents? I don't think so.
@@mikegalvin9801 OJ has more than two kids from previous marriages.
Ive watched an interview of a black female juror of the trial and when she was asked if her and other black jurors had voted not guilty in response to the beating of Rodney king, her reply was “yes”. Truly pathetic.
They should never have allowed blacks on that trial
racist
@@dorothykilgallenwasmurdere1653
@dorothy What about Emmett Till? All white jury all the evidence and no guilty verdict. Injustice is injustice it has nothing to do with race. Horrible people are in every race don’t be a sheep.
K@@dorothykilgallenwasmurdere1653
@@dorothykilgallenwasmurdere1653lol what? So should all jurors b white get real 😂😂
What everyone forgets is he left Nichole brutally murdered for her children to find. Thankfully they were found by a neighbor first.
You were there? Why didn't you call police?
You don't need to be there to know a person is guilty if there's so much DNA evidence proving that he was the perpetrator and the theory by the Defense That OJ was framed makes no sense Why would the detectives risk their careers and possible prison time for framing a man if they don't even know if the man has an alibi or not at The time of the Murder only an air head would fall for that
@@tessaducek5601 one of those "were you there?" comments. The kids were asleep in her house and fortunately didn't find their mother.
Hate to disagree with ya Matt, but I do not believe that oj would've been that hardcore of a man Sir? Everybody that knew the juice stated in his defense that OJ was a charming and caring individual, except for his temper with Nicole...So No, Oj was ruled for me when I heard the children were a asleep up stares...
@ericacharles5608 What a cogent, well constructed argument! Well thought out…engaging for the reader….inspiring yet not at all condescending despite the authors clear mastery of the topic!! It is with admiration and humility that stand here with a changed mind, and a hope that one day, I will be able to offer such eloquent retort.
I was coaching with a former Buffalo Bill defensive end, during the late 90's. He mentioned that OJ was very brutal in his treatment of the Rookies. Actions that would be out of line and borderline evil but he was allowed to get away with it because of his status on the team. When asked if he thought OJ could be guilty, he said ABSOLUTELY!
FYI: innocent people don't jump on a plane in the middle of the night to turn and a fly back home unless you're trying to invent an alibi. You also don't take money, a disguise and your best friend to drive you "out of town" when the cops decide to charge you with the crime.
Ron Goldman had bone on bone defensive wounds on knuckles. OJ didn't have a scratch anywhere on his body. Wasn't OJ bud
@@Jim.Jim.32 glad you brought that up , i have said that for years,
Coroner's report declared wounds on Goldman's hands were NOT defensive, but we're from falling and hitting the ground.
After getting stabbed 17 times and having your head almost cut off, it's hard to stand.
@@Jim.Jim.32I'm sure you're childhood hero is not a hero.
Youd run like a bitch innocent or not if you were wanted for murder
There are 3 possibilities:
1. He did it.
2. He did it.
3. He did it.
and in the final analsis,...he did it!
4. He writes a book, "If I did it".
I believe his son did it
@@jamesellis701 If I ever do something illegal , I sure hope your on my jury jimmy...LOL
@@jackjohnsen8506 thank you, no one has ever wanted me for anything
You know, typically the only time I have 10k in cash, a gun, disguise, passport and emergency clothes is when I commit double homicides. Other than that, I rarely carry all those items at the same time
😂👍👍
That evidence was ruled inadmissible by Judge Ito during the trial. So the jury never even heard about it. Insane, right?
@@joelhague5515 ito should burn in hell
@@joelhague5515 It wouldn't have mattered, jurors have been pretty open about saying they were going with not guilty no matter what as "revenge" for the Rodney King incident.
LOL yes!
Pretty straightforward. He was hanging out in the bushes, stalking the ex-wife and then saw some young, handsome dude coming up the walk. He freaked out and killed them both. He literally got away with murder, because he was a celebrity.
Not just because he was a celebrity, but a black celebrity. Race was 90% of the acquittal. Had it been Terry Bradshaw or Mike Ditka, they would have been convicted on half the evidence.
Well that and the fact that he's an African American.
@@adambump5297 Incorrect. Many African Americans have been treated unfairly by our justice system because of the color of their skin. The difference with OJ is that he was a popular sport's figure that everyone liked, and he had the money to buy an excellent defense team - something many black Americans do not have. The issue is class, not the color of one's skin. There is a different justice system for those who have money as opposed to those who do not.
@@darlenegriffith6186 Yeah I know all that but the race thing was definitely a factor too because of many events that happened around the time like race riots which occurred after the senseless beating of a man named Rodney King by the LAPD. The Defense strategically used Law Enforcement Racism as a reason for the charges they used audio recordings of an LAPD Detective named Mark Fuhrman who used racial slurs against OJ over forties times in just one sitting and they were able to taint the evidence suggesting that it might've been planted by Mark because he was the first one to find it in the estate. Christopher Darden the Deputy Distract Attorney at that time said "It'll do one thing it'll upset the black jurors it will say whose side are you on 'the Man' or 'the Brothers'.". Speaking of which most people on that Jury were people of color eight African Americans, a Hispanic and two of mixed there was only one white guy so yeah with all that in mind I think that race also played a part in it too.
Wasnt OJ. A neighbor saw 3 men arguing with Nicole an hour before the murders. These men did it.
People who weren't around in the mid-90s and before have no idea how well-liked OJ was, and how at first, no one believed he'd done it. As the trial went on, it became obvious to pretty much everyone that he was guilty (there were a few strident black people who still defended him, but I dont think that even they REALLY thought he wasn't guilty). Initially though, everyone thought he'd been in Chicago when the murder occurred, and then he was questioned and released by LAPD--they wouldn't have released him if he was a viable suspect, right? Besides all that, he was a wealthy, well-spoken, Heisman Trophy winning NFL HoF-er and national broadcater; the longtime Hertz spokesman; and Nordberg, Frank Drebin's partner in the "Naked Gun" films. Everyone loved Nordberg--the role was small, but OJ was great in it. Why would a guy like that, a guy who seemingly had everything, go on a stab-crazy kill spree against the mother of his own children and some poor schmuck waiter? Maybe if it had looked like a professional hit, like the way people imagine the rich can make a call and get rid of a problem, there might have been immediate suspicions. But an out of control, deeply personal, hands-on murder? The OJ everyone thought they knew could never do that, and anyway, he was in Chicago. And it must be said, his history of domestic abuse was not known to the public at the time. Both the police and the media kept it under wraps in a way that probably seems incredible to people who don't remember how the world worked 30+ years ago. But celebrities back didn't have their careers ended for slapping their wives around, at least not celebrities about whom the media and local cops thought favorably. Then came the slow-speed White Bronco Chase, and some opinions began to shift; by the end of the trial pretty much everyone agreed he was guilty. And if it wasn't a universally accepted fact that OJ was a psycho killer before, it sure as hell was after he released that super creepy "If I Did It" book.
I was living just a few miles away at the time, working in film (In fact, I was actually in the jury pool for the case). When my roommate told me the news about Simpson's wife and another man being murdered. I said "Oh my gosh, is he o.k.?" Then he told me the blood trail led to his house, and I asked if he had also been attacked. I still couldn't take it in that he was a suspect.
OJ had no involvement with the book. Was paid 600k to not refute it.
@@Jim.Jim.32 People are easily gullible to find fault with celebrities . I believe its jealousy.
Nicole was just 35
i so didn't realize just how young she was [i was just younger enough . . .]
man, this whole case still really gets me
you described what a big deal it was very well
he really was an admired, loved, super handsome, talented athlete. a worthy superstar
the shock was real
They jumped on Furman and his lying about his past as proof of Simpson’s innocence.🤷♀️When it was also Furman who turned his back on Nicole being beaten, when he was one of the cops called to a ‘Domestic’.
Other evidence not listed here. 1) A woman driver at an intersection halfway between Nicole's house & OJ's house reported almost being struck in the intersection by a speeding white Bronco w/its headlights turned off around 10:30. 2) At about 10:40 someone sneaking around behind the guest house on Simpson's property ran into an air conditioning support bracket so hard it violently shook the wall and startled the occupant inside, and then, 3) moments later the limo driver who was waiting to take Simpson to the airport saw Simpson appear from around the side of his house and go inside the front door, when just minutes earlier the limo driver rang the front doorbell and no one answered. After seeing Simpson go inside he went back & rang the doorbell again & Simpson answered the door.
1. was never presented at trial, I believe because she sold her story to the press and the prosecution declined to introduce it.
The prosecution also failed to introduce OJs statement the next day where he clearly lied about a couple of things, as well as his near confession in a letter and everything about the Bronco chase including his disguises.
#2, the limo driver said he saw someone with flashlight on coming from side of house, this he later learnt was Kato. Limo driver said when he recognized a figure walk onto front door, the driver couldn't tell if the figure was coming from side of house or front side from the other entrance.
#1, the lady in highway sold her story to newspaper
@@boerandemo7766 Incorrect, there was no flashlight and the limo driver specifically said the person he saw had O.J. Simpson's build and walked in the front door from the side of the house. Also, selling the story doesn't make it untrue. google "What did limo driver Allan Park see"
Allen Park said the house was dark when he rang multiple times, and when the shadowy figure went in, the lights turned on and OJ answered the phone saying he fell asleep. Hmm
Jill Shively had no idea about the timeline when she submitted her story to Marcia Clark the following day of the murders. It coincided perfectly with the evidences timeline. Sure she may have sold her story for money, but it doesn't mean it didn't happen
There was only one pair of shoe imprints at the crime scene, and they were Bruno Magli. Only OJ would have had those shoes
@@andrewjames8980 she also came forward after the trial had started. no one could confirm her story
Remember: OJ didn’t do it. And even wrote a book about if HE DID IT, with details of the murders. Plus gave an interview for how hypothetically the murders happened. Super innocent as we can see.
I think he did that to troll the Goldman’s 😅
@adeleon24, Of course he did it. He was high on cocaine and there were only one set of shoe prints going from one victim to the other and they were Bruno Mali shoes and they were Oj's shoes and his size. All the evidence proved it.
@@martell203Im of the belief that only a very sick individual would write a book about themselves hypothetically killing the mother of his children
@@owynrobinson7790 He didn’t even write the book. Just look into things before you go along with what everybody else is saying, I have learned to do that. If everyone is saying something similar, it’s most likely BS.
😂
I watched the ENTIRE trial. He did it.
The moment they said not guilty, the look on oj was not one of relief but the unmistakable look of ‘we pulled it off!”
Absolutely disgusting piece of flesh💩
That’s your opinion. It clearly looks like a sigh of relief.
@@jrsmith1998sure looks like a guy reacting to the fact that he just got away with murder to me.
@@wlhjr77 Boy. There was NO evidence to support such claims. You are nothing more than. media propagated parrots.
Most people don't want to go to prison even if they offed their entire family.
The look on Kardashian’s face was more telling.
Unfortunately, All Star legal teams are going to beat City prosecutors almost every time.
O believe that the prosecutor works for the county of LA....nevertheless wr know whatcha meant.
actually a black jury would never convict a black murderer like oj
Doesn't hurt when the prosecutor is intentionally throwing it
@@Maverick-ne3mr naw, you aren’t accusing LA City prosecutors of throwing it are you?
Judge Ito played a huge, huge role in the outcome. He boxed the Prosecution in numerous times by ruling all sorts of evidence against Simpson as inadmissible. A lot of information known to the general public was not allowed to be presented by the Prosecution or considered in jury's deliberations due to Judge Ito's rulings. The best book to read on that trial is "Outrage: The Five Reasons OJ Simpson Got Away with Murder" by Vincent Bugliosi.
Watch the interview he did where he explains how he 'hypothetically' did it. Its truly chilling. He even reveals how Ron tried to do some karate move to defend himself. Scary.
Yes! I just commented on that interview….. basically a point by point of how he did it!!
scariest part is him laughing at times during that. the big giveaway was him saying "i dont recall." to her questions, no need to recall a hypothetical.
There’s an interview with some jurors that said that no matter what, they were going to acquit OJ for revenge for the Rodney King incident. So, let a murder of two go free because another man was beaten (and lived).
That interview doesn’t match with the autopsy
@@andref9663it doesn’t because he made it up. you don’t have to think hard to know who he’s trying to protect but people will ignore that because they want him to be the killer so bad.
When Leather is wet it shrinks...
really now, back then i had a pair of suade leather gloves, shoveled the snow got them soaking wet (all the way through) guess what they DIDN`T shrink.
When it dries usually.
Why do people still defend a cold blooded killer of two innocent people. He couldn’t get his leather gloves on because they were soaked in blood and leather shrinks when wet. And he still breaths and laughing still over his not guilty outcome. Basterd got away with murder in the first degree. 😢
I said the same thing, when leather gets wet and dries, it shrinks if it's 100% real leather. I've had to stretch more than one pair of leather shoes that got wet.
The irony about the MKUltra theory is that, in the film Naked Gun, a "zombie assassin" attempted to kill OJ's character.
O.J. did it. Period. The judgement was influenced by the fact that Los Angeles was still recovering from the riots a few years earlier. The City Government didn't want another one , which they would've gotten for sure. The jury was tainted by this fact. I lived there during the riots and during the O.J. trial. It was obvious that he was gonna walk.
Also the prosecution was terrible
Without OJ being a celebrity, no one ever would've heard of Fuhrman's tapes; prosecution should've brought forth Fuhrman stating "I may have said stuff 2 decades ago, but I've learned and become a better person since then. Fuhrman was a very good detective. Evidence brought forth in the later civil trial was just more damning evidence that OJ did it. Prosecution was arrogant too. Had OJ not been a celebrity, this would've been a 2-week trial or less.
Hell, I remember black women saying Nicole got what ‘was coming to her for marrying a black man!’
THAT was the atmosphere at the time. The suitcase that OJ brought back from Chicago, it’s ON FILM that Robert Kardashian picking it up and leaving, renewed his law license.
Never overlook that a ton of evidence that we the public were aware of was ruled inadmissible by Judge Ito.
@@judywright4241 and the fact that there were many black women on the jury, who would never convict a black man of killing a white women, because of their hatred of white women. I heard black women saying that "Nicole deserved it." They also knew he was guilty as hell, said so, and were glad that he got off.
His lawyers told him to quit taking his arthritis medicine before the trial because they knew it would make his joints swell. Particularly his hands would swell since they knew he left his gloves there.
it`s been almost 30 years, but i dont seem to remember his lawyers having advance notice that he was going to have to try on the gloves that day.
@@davidaltman8831 His lawyers told him to quit talking his arthritis medication weeks before the trial even started incase the prosecution asked him to put on the glove.
And don't forget leather shrinks
@@OUTTA-TYME88 ~ Yup, when leather gets wet, regardless of with what, it shrinks. People either don't know that in this case, or don't care and ignored it...
Didn't he also have plastic gloves on before he made the lame, half hearted attempt to put on the gloves? Insane the jury bought this total BS
Everything you have to know about this case is best told by Norm McDonald!
well its official...murder is legal in California.
@@markmac2206 yep 😂
Ha, ha, absolutely !! If you haven’t seen it, search for it right here on RUclips. Norm & OJ.
No matter how many times I listen to Norm make those wisecracks, they still make me laugh my ass off. He was relentless week after week.
Meh. Brian Heiss's "O.J Simpson fact or Fiction " is the best one. And it makes the idiot know ut all look silly on here. The facts in the videos show that it was impossible Simpson to have done it. Just the facts in the videos. Not any opinions or bias. Well worth watching. I've been to that condo. No way in could one person have done that on that street, inside the condo on that quiet night, without being heard. There had to be at least two people there whom were brutal, but quick. Even the same guy whom Simpson was charged for breaking into his place, said years ago, that Simpson told him one day that Nicole asked him for 30 grand. Simpson asked her, what for. Her reply was. I owe a drug dealer some money. Simpson told her no. That same guy, to this day said that he believed Nicole was killed over a bad drug deal. That story that Simpson told him was years before the murders.
@@epicsseven7686 Of course!
And now try to tell that again without laughing.
My high school teacher had a television rolled into the classroom to watch the verdict live. He turned it off in disbelief.
I wish I could have been there to watch his smug smile droop in disbelief.
@@Gbari7 why though, most people were in disbelief when Oj got away with murder
@@ibg1049 Because most people, like your teacher, know none of the facts of the case. They only know the skewed narrative that the media fed them. The verdict did not surprise those that actually followed the case in its entirety.
A STUPID jury, that's what happened:
Hardly stupid, but either extremely racist, or intimidated while L.A. burned
Some those jurors have even admitted to that.
A BIASED jury. A few of them even publicly admitted that they didn't care what evidence there was against OJ, they went in already having decided they would acquit to 'get back' at the system for the Rodney King acquittals.
The one white juror came out and said that all 8 of the black jurors bullied the rest into a not-guilty verdict during deliberations instead of a hung-jury to ensure double-jeopardy attached and they couldn't retry OJ with a non-biased jury.
not stupid but racist in that it was a black jury, they wont convict a black murderer
They didn't want to believe the truth, even if it was right in front of their face...
I’ll never forget them reading the verdict “Not guilty” and see footage from around the country of hundreds of people cheering.
Yeah, not to mention the people who lined the streets and cheered him on during that ridiculous slow speed "Police chase"
Made me sick to my stomach
That moment showed visually how polarized America was by race.
@McPh1741 - Even his attorneys were shocked. That NG verdict was most def racist.
Yeah, and they were all black.
It really is a shame that Simpson's incarceration for the Las Vegas incident interrupted his search for the real murderer.
Now we'll never know who did it
Lol👍👍 And all the golf games he had to play…..
He must think the "REAL KILLERS" are golfers he looks there alot lol
😂😅 yeah, damn shame. They probably would have found the “real” killers if not for that 🙄
@@WillWilsonII 😂
Can't believe there are people who really think he's not guilty to this day.
People who believe he's not guilty have looked into the actual case and researched the supposed "evidence". Media can twist the truth and hide the details to prove a narrative.
Motive: They were broken up and OJ had a girlfriend. Why that night of all nights when the kids are there? Why drive a vehicle everyone knows you own? His ex-wife said he never laid a hand on her.
Blood evidence: OJ's blood was only found after he willingly gave a sample. The entirety of said "blood" evidence were droplets that would fit on a pinky nail. It also contained EDTA a known blood anti-coagulant used when collecting blood samples.
Evidence tampering: They had one of the lead detectives on tape willingly describing how they plant evidence to bolster cases all while using racial slurs. Another detective admitted to driving around with blood evidence. (Occam's razor huh?)
Unusual circumstances: They had OJ examined and he had no evidence of bruises consistent with a fight. Just a cut on his finger, a cut not replicated on either glove found. Goldman had defensive wounds that showed he fought for his life before he died. They tested the pipes in OJ's house and there's no evidence of blood at all. Forensics show that the way Nicole was killed, the assailant would have been covered in blood. I could go on and on, but you get the point.
Have you ever seen a casual media outlet report this stuff? Of course not, because they have a narrative they want to put out. I'm no OJ fan, I think he's a dirt bag, I think the whole lot of them were drug addled sexual deviants. My point being, I could believe he had something to do with what happened, but I'll never believe he killed them both and somehow got rid of his bloody clothes and the weapon, got cleaned up, all in time to make his flight.
And all it takes is one such idiot on a jury. This jury unfortunately was filled with handpicked fools who were played.
Well the court said he was not guilty. That’s like saying “I can’t believe people really think George Zimmerman is not guilty.” They said he was not guilty.
@@grumpent "The court" said no such thing. A group of biased black jurors declared the State of California hadn't proved its case, which was ridiculous and scandalous.
@@marktrain9498 what does it say on the tapes of the trial and from a quick google search ? “Not guilty” you can have all the opinions you want of the case but it’s facts that it states he is not guilty. That’s what counts and matters in the court of law.
If you wanted to make yourself seem innocent, wouldn't you do it right before you go to chicago. He had it planned. He knew what he was doing.
The bloody shoe print left at the murder scene was from an expensive uncommon shoe in size 12 made by Bruno Magli. Simpson said he would never wear such ugly shoes so it couldn't have been his. Then a proto showed up with Simpson crossing a football field years before wearing Bruno Magli shoes.
Tom Lange was one of the detectives, not a supportive neighbor. The picture they showed was definitely the detective, I remember him from watching the trial on TV.
Nicole's neighbor was also named Tom Lang. He saw Nicole arguing with 3 men in front of her condo an hour before murders. These men did it. Wasn't OJ
@@Jim.Jim.32 Could have been her Asian pornstar neighbor, Hung Far Low Wang. He was known to whack his victims unconscious with his rather large tool then go to work slicing and dicing.
Detective Lange finally took off that silly wig, it made him look ridiculous while he was testifying.
@@Jim.Jim.32 who were the men that killed Ron and Nicole if it wasn’t OJ??
@@simonbelmont65 We will never know, but a fair assumption was the 3 men seen arguing with Nicole an hour before the murders. FBI believed the target was Faye Resnik, Nicoles roommate who had skipped town 2 days before the murders. .
Everyone inside the medical community know what OJ did to make sure those gloves would not fit in court. Because of his football career his hands had arthritis and he was taking anti inflammatory medication which reduce the swelling caused by this condition. He stopped his medication 1 mth before he knew he would have to try gloves on in court. His hands swelled up and with the rubber gloves on under those leather gloves also hindered the gloves for fitting. He absolutely did these murders and those gloves would have fit if he was still on the prescribed medication. The prosecution dropped the ball not checking medications he was prescribed.
He stalked her. He watched her being romantic with another man. He confronted her. She showed up at her door with a knife in her hand. His psychopathic anger took over. He over took her. The knife cut his knuckle. He proceeded to, in a rage, stab her to the point of decapitation. Goldman showed up, he was overpowered by OJ. There were defensive wounds on Goldman's hands. OJ had Nicole's blood on his socks, OJ bleed from the knuckle, he Stepped in Goldman's blood leaving his shoe print. Blood was found in the Bronco, his socks, and his house. He got home and bagged up his clothes, shoes and the knife. He trashed the bag on his way to the airport.
The bloody shoe prints that were left at the scene of the crime,, were Bruno Magli Italian shoes... OJ Simpson was quoted as saying """ I wouldn't wear those ugly ass shoes""" a keen eyed journalist uncovered a picture of him wearing those Bruno Magli shoes in an unrelated photo shoot.
@@teresewecker facts.
There are real people out there that don’t think he did it. Can’t comprehend that level of stupidity.
It isn't what you know it's what you can prove in court. The DA's were completely inept. Although in its early stages DNA evidence was available thru the FBI.
You literally haven’t looked over a single element of the case and are just going with what your parents told you.
because we know things you don't and live in hollywood lol
To buy a Hollywood Murder Mystery of Fables and Fiction is another level of Brainwashing Delusion. lol 😂
@@wtfj4462 How do you know what the commenter saw or didn't see?.
I watched the case unfold on tv...
He is guilty.
It's pretty obvious that YOU didn't watch the trial.
O.J. Simpson didn't do it !!
It was the magical flying knife with the ability to plant O.J's DNA that did it.
What likely happened.... He turned two people into human pez dispensers, the murdering son of a bitch.
Yup, and the wonderful minorities of this blessed ridiculous country helped to set him free because of the fear of violence by protesters.
@@x.adam1you forgot about Mark Furman. Do all white detectors hate black people or just Mark?
Watch the hypothetical interview he did. He literally re-enacts the murder he committed
Yes, that's chilling.
What really happened is racism saved OJ.
For goodness sake. We all know O.J. did it.
Are you Sure? He was a Buffalo Bill ya know. over 2000 yards in a season too.
@@richbutler7828we all know Mark fuhrman and LAPD hate black people so they probably set him up
The look on Robert Kardashian’s face said that not guilty was the wrong outcome
The interesting thing is that the Police stopped their search for the killer knowing full well that OJ Simpson was the killer all along
There is no “likely”. Everyone knows he did it. This case would result in his lifetime imprisonment of conducted any time after the 2000’s.
He was found not guilty. He couldn’t have done it.
Apparently the people who heard all of the evidence (you know, the jury), didn’t think so.
RIP .. we know Simpson did it and what a crazy car chase we watched on TV--had it been anyone else they would have hit the rear corner...
Why murder his kids mom?
@@daviddavis3389 because she left him after he battered her face to a pulp several times? Gee, Idunno.
I believe he did it. No doubt. But for some reason, I don’t believe he was alone. Who the other person was, or why I think that, I don’t know. I just can’t get it out my head that I believe someone else was there.
That’s interesting that you should say that because I was thinking the same thing. It’s takes a lot of energy to take on two people and the aftermath was savage, like a unhuman person, definitely not human to me.
Yeah, it was Al Cowlings
They were ambushed separately. Nicole first from behind, then Goldman was corned in a gated garden space because he had witnessed the attack on Nicole and was rushing to defend her. OJ was much bigger than Goldman.
His son helped him.
OJ would rather see Nicole dead than with another man. Cold blooded, Orenthal.
Yes, you are correct. If OJ and Marguerite stayed married, this tragedy never would have happened.
Of course, he did it! Everyone knew he did it, even the jury knew. The prosecution made some big mistakes and Cochran did what he always did. Judge Ito went easy on the defense and very hard on the prosecution. I'm sure he wanted to avoid a challenge to his rulings, but he went too far IMO. It didn't matter, because the jury was determined to get revenge for Rodney King. It's called Jury Nullification and it's wrong, but good luck proving that. Years later, juror Carrie Bess admitted to it knowing that nothing could be done. I do understand that, but I never thought OJ was the guy who should benefit.
It's infuriating that race became such a large part of the case when it had no place in what happened. In reality, it was a DV case that ended in death. They happen every day, multiple times, in every walk of life. Rich, poor, famous, it doesn't matter.
What likely happened?? Erm, so a jealous and abusive ex-husband murdered his wife and her lover. This is probably the most famous miscarriage of justice in modern history. He so obviously murdered them that I find it ridiculous having to say it.
Oj did it. I have ZERO doubts.
What everyone seems to forget O.J. had just completed a movie which has never been released were real Navy Sea'sl had gave him lessons on how to kill with a knife. Wasn't even brought up in court.
Correct, Bullfrog . 📺 It was a NBC pilot. OJ would of been a Magnum PI type SEAL officer who ran around fighting crimes, kissing sexy women 😘 . OJ was taught how to use a Ka Bar. 🔪
Uh if he didn’t kill them how do you explain the blood DNA evidence. Impossible to explain.
What absolutely happened is he got away with it due to a racist black jury that was NOT a jury of his peers. I’m a Bills fan and he used to be my favorite player. Now I want him removed from the “wall of shame “!
racist black jury vs racist mark fuhrman .....so what's the problem.
@@donovans6472 Mark Furhman was so racist that he used his racist powers to cut OJ with a knife and plant his DNA all over the crime scene. He also made OJ assault his wife several times prior to that with racism mind control powers and made him commit armed robbery in a casino years after the fact. Yeah, sounds legit. Maybe OJ is just a filthy cold blooded killer and you're delulu.
I think we all know OJ is guilty ,to say his son did it is absolutely awful
Not to mention a dumb idea!
Son did it. That's what the evidence shows and proves. Deal with it
@@jonathanfeldheim6554 Another coddler heard from.
@@giii7599 happy to know I'm being heard, because we're still getting the Lindberg baby case wrong too. This video glosses over just how convincing and damning the evidence against Jason is, while still explaining all the other accepted "facts" about the case. So what if evidence was obtained illegally? Let's see...son works as a chef, with access to knives, had a history documented violence, his time card for that night is clearly not right, a eyewitness who saw him there passed a lie detector test...let's not forget after the car chase it was Jason who approached the Bronco with the world watching and guns aimed. This video literally relies on an illusory "Occam's razor" theory to support its theory....that's like saying God is real because Christ died for your sins. HUH?!?
The son was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon…he attacked his girl friend with a knife. He had several other arrests for assault. He didn’t like his step mom and had documented long term drug abuse and mental health issues.
He might not be guilty of the murder, but he should have been investigated closer. He was never even interviewed. LAPD incompetence.
Simpson acted guilty from the start. The Bronco chase through the streets of L.A.?? And an innocent man would have taken the stand without hesitation to defend himself to the world. it’s really as simple as that. Guilty as hell.
You’re naïve
i could tell you didn't do your homework on the case because if you did you would know that he wanted to take the stand..but his lawyers decided that he didn't need to
Was in 5th grade...
Teachers packed all of us in 1 room yelling SHUT UP! Quiet! while they huddled around the tv when the verdict was read
The trial was a disaster...wrong venue and a simple minded jury, poor prosecuting attorneys who didn't have the heart for the job, a weak minded judge, cameras in the courtroom, etc. The DA gave away the trial from day one.
💯
The judge did not have the backbone needed for a case like this, true, but the prosecution was pouring their heart and souls into it, working around the clock for months on end, and on a breakneck time table because the defense used strategies to hurry everything up, and with witnesses who often wouldn’t cooperate because they were intimated by Simpson’s celebrity status.
simple minded how? Ever encountered LAPD while Black?
Oh please, OJ is guilty and will have to face his maker someday
Jesus riding in on the Trojan Horse anytime now…
Despising God's patience , grace and longsuffering???@@ElsElbows
Well, the time is now
@concerned1144 u should be concerned about what God is going to do with u sinner. One sinner is worried about another sinner. On judgment u will have your own problems.
Ojs son did not have a cut finger only oj
What's sickening is all those who cheered back when Simpson was found not guilty!
Eggs all over your faces!
This whole story make me physically ill. The fact he got off because of a Race issue and his Money is just appalling!! Biggest injustice ever and anyone affiliated with getting him off should be in jail or shot!!
Like all the lynching, in the U.S.A?, I guess you're right.
This wasn't about lynching it was about a narcissistic jealous ex husband killing 2 people and disgusting defence attorneys using the race card to get him off! Simpson doesn't have a conscience! Black people have
certainly suffered much injustice but Nicole and Ron suffered injustice by the so called criminal justice system by setting the criminal free!
yeah, it wouldn't be a lynching, but justice. His life isn't worth the price of a bullet
@@Steven-ks1jd the fact that you can't see the difference is pathetic.
@@darlahays2471 but I do see the racism, the nerve of him getting off , because he's rich, he's still BLACK.
Black America cheered when he got off…
Lots of stupid people of other races cheered too. It was disgusting.
Yes we did!
O.J.'s best defense was his name...not the lawyers he used. The only person who knows if he did it or not was himself. Money talks and BS walks. I believe he was guilty.
OJ's guilty?!?!?! oh, man. norm mcdonald would love to see this. (r.i.p norm)
Well its official... murder is legal in the state of California!
Norman Pardo is a PI who investigated this for over 20 years. His movie who killed Nicole he brings receipts with his conclusions. He explains every piece of evidence unlike the prosecution or anyone who’s really made a doc about this. He shows how oj went there with glen rogers and he goes on to explain the blood evidence as well as the discrepancy that they both died an hour apart. He even explains why this all happened. He’s the only person to explain ALL the evidence not just part of it.
another theory i heard back in the day, as to why OJ didnt have any marks on him from fighting goldman was that he was wearing the wetsuit from navy seals or whatever the title from his last (and as far as i know unreleased) film was
Simpson had a cut on his hand.
@@mintwally7200 OJ cut his hand on a glass, hotel in Chicago.
OJ did a NBC pilot film called Bullfrog ...🐸 a Magnum PI type action show where he played a SE Asia veteran, SEALs UDT. ⚓️ Simpson used a Ka Bar 🔪 in 2 scenes. He was taught by SOF veterans.
@@DavidLLambertmobile Lol, yeah right. That's why there's drops of blood leading down the sidewalk to the back gate at Nicoles, and, blood drops at the Simpson residence in the driveway and front entrance.
Lopez also mentioned that Johnny Cochan told her to lie, but the jury never heard that, if they did they might have found oj guitiy.
I have utmost sympathy for Black people's rage for unjust treatment based on race because that is the essence of wrong . However celebrating OJ being found not guilty as a victory for Blacks was , sadly , terribly misplaced and undermines the point of truth and justice for all , regardless of race,color or creed
Do you have sympathy for all groups of people who are unjustly treated due to their race? Or just the black ones
@@sjalusi1just black ones.
Everyone else deserves what they get
Well stated!👍
@@timmebruer5205 that's a good one!!
The truth is all of them were guilty. King, OJ, Brown, Floyd. All of them were scum.
I'm not sure why Marsha Clark didn't know that leather gloves shrink when they get wet and then dry.... of course they wouldn't fit.
it was Darden's idea. Clark fought him tooth and nail not to do it but he did.
Especially with rubber gloves on!🤪
Marsha Clark was too busy trying to get a big black dude to bang her to focus on the case.
Darden had beef with Cochran and got baited into that which infuriated Clark.
Also they’d gotten a duplicate pair from the manufacturer to use instead and it was discovered at the last minute they were the wrong size. Defense argued to let him try on the originals and judge allowed it.
Let's face it Simpson was guilty, he wasn't prosecuted because he was a black superstar athlete! Also, this incident happened shortly after thugs pillaged the streets of LA because of the Rodney King verdict
@tcollier5460
"Let's face it Simpson was guilty, he wasn't prosecuted because he was a black superstar athlete!"
Not true. OJ was prosecuted, as he was tried in a court of law.
@@reginaldsmith6949 Simpson was tried, but never prosecuted! Do you remember Reggie Denny, he was the innocent man ripped out of his truck and ambushed by a bunch of thugs and left to die in the riots! Meanwhile, that creep was found not guilty!
@@reginaldsmith6949 Would you make that statement if he killed a loved one, with your last name!!
@@tcollier5460 Did you mean convicted instead of prosecuted? I get the anguish one would experience in a case like this, but the state failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
OJ walked because Judge Ito was bribed. He threw out evidence and testimony the jury was not allowed to consider that would have got OJ. He to this day still refuses to talk about the trial. Guilty conscience.
Remember when OJ wrote that book If i did it? When he was interviewed he said that Ron Goldman jumped into a karate stance? Thats a strange detail to put in a hypothetical. Why would you make that small detail?
I agree.
any person who writes a book called If I Did it? did it. that's like the serial killer dude who proclaimed he saw the murders in his dream acting all mentally challenged. "i dreamed..." So glad the one guy/cellmate got him on tape...make sure he stays where he is at.
The LAPD is not looking for another suspect They consider it a closed case
A murderer that got off.
OJ’s son being the killer is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. He did it in a fit of jealous rage after she didn’t attend a family dinner he organized? Yea right.
He literally wrote what happened in a book. Seriously! PPL. C'mon. He was a violent abusive possessive and she was absolutely terrified of him. Oh and BTW so effing guilty he wrote it in a book and published it.
One question I've always had was how in the he was the bronco not filled with blood everywhere?
Before I even knew that Oj Simpson was a former Football Star I just knew him as someone who definitely got away with two murders scoot free.
Who do you think killed 3 of dons friends during and Fter the trial. They worked at the same restRaunt.
They were drug dealers. Waiters living like millionaires. AlwYsnpay your debts
If a person is stupid enough to write a book “If I Did It” Duh!!
what happens when you get involved with human waste
Lay with pigs and get dirty.
No it was OJ
Tom Lang was one of the LAPD Detectives working the case, not a neighbor who was a witness.
The neighbor had the same name as the detective, 2 different people
The MK ultra theorists have watched the first Naked Gun movie way too many times...
I believe oj is guilty but how in the world with all that blood did he get in his truck and barley get it on anything. He woulda been in a panic probably ably very nervous and moving around a lot. His clothes woulda been soaked in blood like the gloves , yet there were only tiny traces of blood in the car. I just think there shoulda been WAY more blood than what they supposedly found.
Yeah thats the strange part
He was wearing the jumpsuit from his movie I forgot which one
If he were standing behind or over, he would’nt necessarily have had a lot of blood on him. Also the criminalist Dennis Fung who processed the scene for blood saw the sweatshirt but didn’t have it tested because he didn’t “see” blood on the dark fabric-big mistake.
The glove issue was moot to the jury. He tried on a new pair of the same gloves that fit perfectly later in the trial. The media picked and chose what their audience would see regarding this case. The main reason he was acquitted was mark furhman pleading the 5th amendment when he was asked if he planted evidence in this case. That’s rarely ever shown on docs like these.
The leather glove had gotten wet which shrank it.
@@VintageVera it didn’t matter. They tried to make this some pivotal point in the trial and it wasn’t.
@@VintageVera Plus Simpson wore plastic gloves underneath. And you could see he was expanding his fingers while pulling on the gloves to give the impression that they didn't fit.
@@VintageVerathat isn’t true. It was proven in court
you are breezing over the facts and leaving out many things. the jury only took 4 hours to make a not guilty verdict and they sat through the trial for 11 months! he did not have a motive the night of the killing! he did not have time to do it the night of the killing and he didnt show any evidence of a man that just killed two people when he was signing autographs in the air port and talking to people on the plane including talking to the pilot. this was a rush to judgement and no other people were ever investigated. The thought by the police from the start was OJ did it and they never looked any other way!
Well, where was he when the limo driver called home?
OJ didn’t kill anyone. He played for The Bills and as we all know The Bills don’t stab they choke. Heyooooo
Sick, but I like it.
😂😂😂😂
That's fucked up but true 😂😂😂
I happened to be watching TV when the chase happened.
At the time there had never been something like that live on TV but today it's a pretty normal thing
that was the start of reality TV
The jury failed the victims, it was a complete slam dunk case that he was guilty
I tended to think others were involved in the murders. But then I was thoroughly disgusted by O.J.'s nasty book about how he would have done it...if he did it....but he didn't. It was so cold and there was no feeling for Nicole. Therefore I have no feelings for him about guilt, innocence or anything else. He apparently did not care about Nicole or what happened to her and Ron Goldman.
How could u think that!? He was a well known wife abuser with a mountain of evidence against him. Fleeing the scene with a disguise and bleeding! Lol. Amazing.
Though I can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that what I'm about to tell you is true, you'll just have to believe me that it is. Months before the verdict, someone I knew who worked in law enforcement and took his job very seriously, said something that stunned me at first beings he was so damn honorable. He said "The best justice will be if OJ gets acquitted." Huh? I said "You don't think he did it?" "No, I'm totally convinced he did it." "Where are you coming from?" He said "Over half of his life he has been idolized. What do you think will happen if he gets acquitted? Is it safe to think everybody out there will hate him?" I said yes. He said "You got to trust me. For that guy to go out there and not be idolized, that's worse then jail. If you REALLY want to punish that guy, turn him loose and let everybody out there hate him. That would be a way better punishment." Well, I can't say I agreed. That is until one year after the verdict. They were doing anniversary type of reports on the news and nearly all had a "what OJ is doing now" part of the story. If you look very carefully, you'll see he aged way worse in that one year then any time he was in jail. Then of course it all made sense what he said. OJ really thought that when it was over, it would be like nothing happened - because he was OJ Simpson. Didn't turn out that way obviously. So in a weird way, maybe it was better for him to be acquitted. What gets me is that it's already been 28 years since the verdict and he is still alive - I thought for sure his heart would have given out by now. Hmmm.
I believe you. What the law enforcement person made sense. OJ may have been a hero in jail, but is a pariah on the outside.
Most American prisons are a joke. I read Scott Peterson eats great meals and plays basketball all day.
That stupid low speed chase should have been enough to convict him.
AMEN!!! He Can't Get Away From
GOD & JESUS 👀 😔😏😞🏃
It’s possible his son did it and OJ covered for him.
Neither
nope
Nicole’s friend Brent Cantor was murdered in a similar fashion only months before. Brent, Nicole, and Ron were all involved in the drug trade. OJ had cutoff Nicole financially, and Nicole wanted to go into the restaurant business to maintain her standard of living over the long term. In order to raise funds, she went into the drug trade. Nicole, Brent, and Ron were just about decapitated which was a standard assassination method in the drug trade. Other waiters from the Mezzaluna were involved in the drug trade including Michael Nigg who had transferred from the Mezzaluna’s Aspen restaurant and had been selling drugs to the wealthy people there. Michael Nigg was assassinated in broad daylight after the OJ trial.
They don't want to hear THOSE facts, though - they want OJ to be guilty so bad.
This was about dope. OJ had moved on and was with another woman when this happened. Nicole was trying to get back with HIM.
The timeline makes no sense.
The glove was too small, and was planted. All the cops involved were also involved in the Rampart case that set hundreds of inmates free because of... planted evidence.
Supposedly, the glove didn't fit because OJ was told to not take his arthritis medication ( which isn't true, they came up with him trying on the glove in the moment, so he wouldn't have known NOT to take his medication). So an arthritic former NFL player, having never killed before, is just supposed to be able to kill two people, not get any blood on him, and catch a flight without being nervous or agitated (he was around a bunch of folks in the airport and on the plane, and had to keep asking what happened on the flight back, and didn't know there were two people killed - he just thought it was Nicole that had died). Either OJ is the greatest killer of all time, or he didn't do it.
This topic you talk about was never even considered during the investigation. They just thought Oj did it because Mr Goldman was probably seeing her was the cause of rage. once you get a moniker attached to your name its hard to shake it.
I've always thought Kato knew more than he was letting on.
So the dog done it!?
@@justtango4741 It's just odd how he concocted the whole other guy being there and just kept mentioning Kato "the dog".
Garry Shandling, "Knock...knock"
Kato, "Who's there?"
Shandling, "Oh, you know!"
i dont think anyone has ever accused Kato of knowing more. or anything at all.
Kato admitted he didn’t tell everything because he was afraid of OJ and was also living there free. He moved to Europe before stating he believed OJ did it.
It gets boring hearing stupid people say "conspiracy theorist"
Tom Lange was not a neighbour, he was a homicide detective assigned to the case.
RHD LAPD. Los Angeles police use ranks D 1/2/3. A D-3 would have 15yr 20yr on the job.
OJ is guilty as sin
You were in the bushes watching
@@leeedwards8323 nope we listen to the evidence and put 2 and 2 together it was pretty easy so many things lead to him theres NO doubt 100% he did it
@@leeedwards8323 so the whole police department framed him huh ?😂
@slabbusterrtr7690 Them 2 racist pigs that rode around with evidence in they pocket.