One Up 300 Guided Tour | a how-to for you |

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 янв 2025

Комментарии • 11

  • @VFDirector
    @VFDirector 16 дней назад +2

    Got off to a good start, then needed your video for some help! Gotta learn to sweep more. Did minimal penciling. Missed a few obvious things 🤦🏻‍♀. Oh well....I got 'er done (with your help! Thanks!)

  • @andrewralph1603
    @andrewralph1603 17 дней назад +2

    You do this so easily! I had pretty much the same plan but missed an easy step and struggled

    • @Permpuzzled
      @Permpuzzled  17 дней назад

      @@andrewralph1603
      Well, these videos aren’t first runs. Normally I’d rather share what works than you have to unlearn what doesn’t it. So you get refined paths here.
      That said, I couldn’t have posted a first run of 300 anyway. I test solved it last month so I’d already seen it.

  • @SteveH-t8g
    @SteveH-t8g 16 дней назад +2

    Great solve. If you recall I asked for a walkthrough of the last 10x10 (#200) as it was the only time I had failed to complete a One Up puzzle. Well I managed this one without any problems so I guess I must be improving!

    • @Permpuzzled
      @Permpuzzled  16 дней назад

      @@SteveH-t8g
      Congrats on the solve! It’s a big complicated puzzle.
      I’m sure you’re improving too. Are you using the apps as well or keeping it to the dailies?

    • @SteveH-t8g
      @SteveH-t8g 16 дней назад +1

      Have competed the lite version. Maybe should go for the main app now.

    • @Permpuzzled
      @Permpuzzled  16 дней назад

      @
      There’s 9x9s and 10x10s in there. Lots to enjoy.

  • @polstein777
    @polstein777 16 дней назад +1

    300 already, but only 111 for me. Also funny how this larger was was easier then many smaller ones.

    • @Permpuzzled
      @Permpuzzled  16 дней назад

      There's no escalated logic in here, so some of the difficulty is a scanning test using large size and and that offset, unsquare frame. It's really easy to get in the weeds.
      I've seen some 25 mins, but also several 12-15 minute ones and one other under 10.
      Anyway, without complicated logic and notes, I can see that. It's not 809 for sure.

  • @Martiniana2000
    @Martiniana2000 17 дней назад

    Не съм съгласна!

    • @Permpuzzled
      @Permpuzzled  17 дней назад

      @@Martiniana2000
      Oh. Anything in particular?