PADMAAVAT Movie Reaction Part 3/3! | Deepika Padukone | Ranveer Singh | Shahid Kapoor

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 авг 2024
  • Reaction Gear: amzn.to/2QgTwk2 (affiliate link)
    ____________________
    Intro music by DAVIS
    RUclips - bit.ly/30OK7RR
    Spotify - spoti.fi/2I3vRvE
    iTunes: apple.co/2KnvgYN
    SoundCloud: / unofficialdavis
    Facebook: / unofficialdavis
    Twitter: / unofficialdavis
    Instagram: / unofficialdavis
    ___
    Jamazing Patrons of March: Krishna Venkataraman, Avijit Singh, Riju Mahna and Daipayan Das!
    Be a patron for Jaby and support more videos like this!
    / jabykoay
    ___________________________________________________
    SOCIAL MEDIA:
    ~STEPH SABRAW~
    Instagram: @StephSabraw
    RUclips: @TheWhirlGirls
    ~ANDREW GORDON~
    Twitter & Instagram: Agor711
    @MovieSource
    / moviesource
    ~JABYBHAI~
    RUclips: @CineDesi
    Twitter: / thecinedesi
    Instagram: / thecinedesi
    ~VEERENDRA CHOWDARY~
    Veerendra Chowdary created the opening animation.
    Twitter: @NameisVeeru
    ~MOOSA RAZA~
    Moosa Raza created additional background animation.
    Instagram: @syedraza7
    Twitter: @MoosaRaza27
    ___________________________________________________
    JABY KOAY'S SHORT FILMS PLAYLIST:
    • JABY'S SHORT FILMS & F...
    Click here to subscribe and know when the next video drops:
    ruclips.net/user/subscription_c...
    Thanks for watching!!!
    __________________________________________________
    Credit of my favorite movie reviews song:
    Highlight Reel Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
    creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
    Intro song: Hudson Stanton (looks more like Nick Jonas than me)
    RUclips: / hudson12311
    Insta: / hudsonstantonmusic
  • ПриколыПриколы

Комментарии • 1,5 тыс.

  • @apsara5839
    @apsara5839 Год назад +5227

    I still can't get over the fact that you guys watched the entire movie thinking the Queen was the Mother in Law🌝💀😂😂😂. I can't

  • @naitikoraon9049
    @naitikoraon9049 Год назад +925

    Again no one is praising Shahid Kapoor's performance... 🥲 Very underrated performance

    • @humamumtaz2719
      @humamumtaz2719 Год назад +44

      He stole the show if you ask me. He was perfect.

    • @rinidmoron
      @rinidmoron 9 месяцев назад +13

      Humans aren't programmed to react well to anything understated, especially in movies. If Shahid played Khilji, which I believe he is totally capable of, he would've been praised more than Ranveer. As an audience, we like menacing characters, characters that are mentally challenged or basically any trait that makes the character stand out from the rest of us. People wonder why Shahid keeps cribbing about his experience on the sets of this movie, the reason is he is now a veteran in this business , he knows what clicks with the audience more and he was probably convinced by the director that he would present him in a way that the audience would acknowledge his presence in the movie too but while filming he might have realized that isn't how things were going, that's why he seems so salty about that movie and his experience with the cast. I am sure many actors rejected the role before Shahid said yes. same thing that happened with Karan Johar while casting for Tina in KKHH. Most lead actors wouldn't agree to play a second fiddle in a movie.

    • @arch391
      @arch391 8 месяцев назад +3

      Cause his character was written very differently which does go well with many.

    • @frozendory9112
      @frozendory9112 8 месяцев назад +2

      Honesty performances which are natural always stays underrated. People can't understand a performance great without drama and overacting.

    • @srsrt6979
      @srsrt6979 8 месяцев назад +1

      slb potrayed it such that only ranveer and dipika would be seen, he didnt do much for sahids role

  • @RitikBenipal
    @RitikBenipal Год назад +954

    Ranveer Singh won several best actor awards for his role in the movie. Sometime near the end of that year, him and Deepika got married. During an awards show he said, "I might not have found the queen in the film, but I definitely found my queen in real life."

    • @aditisk99
      @aditisk99 Год назад +65

      The fact that he didn't get her in all 3 slb movies😅

    • @RitikBenipal
      @RitikBenipal Год назад +17

      @@aditisk99 Fr. It took a cameo in a completely different movie for them to end up together 😂

    • @angelinagoswami820
      @angelinagoswami820 Год назад

      @@RitikBenipal What movie are you talking about?

    • @shivkirtisharma7535
      @shivkirtisharma7535 Год назад +1

      @@angelinagoswami820 movie name is circus and song name is current laga re

  • @cardrift4515
    @cardrift4515 Год назад +2377

    Imagine how many Rajputs,Sikhs, maratha got martyred in Saving the golden bird from Mlecha Invaders, Same story but thousands of different defenders🙏🙏

    • @dhimankalita1690
      @dhimankalita1690 Год назад +58

      I appreciate how the makers turned this historical fictional story into such a wonderous movie. Everything about it was perfect. One of the best hostorical fictional character padmavati. Loved it

    • @MostIgn0red
      @MostIgn0red Год назад +117

      And sadly rajputs never got the respect they deserved

    • @cgxrabbit1033
      @cgxrabbit1033 Год назад +113

      ​@@MostIgn0red All the Literate Indians knows and Respects the Rajput's.

    • @supernova652
      @supernova652 Год назад +32

      ​@@GamerOne_me True. Their ego killed them and now they show off their false bravado

    • @cgxrabbit1033
      @cgxrabbit1033 Год назад +19

      @@supernova652 Kings Will have egos

  • @prabhatsourya3883
    @prabhatsourya3883 Год назад +1119

    In real history, the battle wasn't this easy. I do understand that Sanjay Leela Bhansali did this for dramatization purposes. But in real history, there was only ONE siege of Chittorgarh, which lasted for 8 long months, when Allauddin besieged Chittorgarh from all sides, and repeatedly used massive trebuchets to pummel the walls of Chittorgarh fort with massive boulders, finally gaining entry around August 1303. The women in the fort ended up committing Jauhar, and the soldiers were eliminated in battle.
    However, here was the major plot twist. Allauddin Khilji was livid towards Chittorgarh, and was raring to raze it to the ground. However, the Mongols, seeing that Delhi was undefended, decided to attack Delhi for their 4th attempt. They had already breached into the Punjab Region, and were advancing towards Delhi. Allauddin appointed his son Khizr Khan as the governor, kept his general Malik Shahin as the regent, and had to hurriedly pack up and run back towards Delhi. However, he did give orders to decimate and plunder Chittorgarh as a vengeance, which would be carried out by his governors.
    Allauddin rushed to Delhi, where the Mongols attacked and besieged him for two full months at the fort of Siri. He had to recall his general Malik Chajju (who was leading the charge towards the Kakatiya Dynasty of Warangal (Present Day Telangana)) to break the deadlock, which he finally did. After he dealt with the Mongols, he went back to Chittorgarh, to recapture it after Malik Shahin abandoned his post due to pressure from the Gujarati Monarchs. This time, Allauddin gave the throne of Chittorgarh to the local Chahamana chief Maladeva, under an indirect alliance system, to prevent the region from rising up again, which works well till the Khilji Dynasty remains in power. After the Khilji Dynasty collapsed, the region declared independence and re-declared hostilities with the following dynasties.
    Coming to the conflict itself, both Islamic and Rajput historians agree unanimously that the Causus Belli for the invasion of Chittorgarh was not Rani Padmavati in particular, but rather the fact that Chittorgarh was providing shelter to the rebel fighters of Ranthambhore (which Allauddin had conquered in the year before the previous), and Allauddin demanded that Chittorgarh submit to his protection and surrender the rebel fighters to him. Rani Padmavati would obviously have been a secondary concern, and Allauddin would have captured her if he could, he was a savage military conqueror, who takes away or levels down the territories he conquers, just to strike terror. But he didn't launch the invasion of Chittorgarh purely for Rani Padmavati.
    Again, this movie was inspired from an epic poem, so it was shown this way, but the real history had much more intrigue than the movie in itself. This episode of history can be stretched out into a multiple season web-series.

    • @2024ythandle
      @2024ythandle Год назад +1

      ​@@xiayolevis6033 show me the fact existence of motherfuker allhah

    • @prabhatsourya3883
      @prabhatsourya3883 Год назад +94

      @@xiayolevis6033 Amir Khusrau, who was the official court historian of Allauddin Khilji, wrote an account of the Siege of Chittorgarh in his work "Khaza'in ul-Futuh". In this account, he makes an allusion to the queen, although he doesn't mention her by name. The name and the fabled history came from later Rajput retellings of the Siege, which were then taken up into the epic poem by Malik Mohammed Jayasi, developing into the story that this movie uses as its basis.
      In fact, if you want to be REALLY pedantic about history, even the details of Raja Ratan Singh are murky in historical accounts. Islamic Historians claim that he surrendered at the end and was exiled out from his kingdom, while Rajput historians claim that he died fighting. Modern historians are more inclined to believe that the king died fighting, because there were two transitions of power after Ratan Singh, which would have been impossible if the ruler was left alive, as he would have definitely rallied resistance and created a revolution, as was happening in Ranthambhore before this siege.
      However, there are multiple accounts of the Siege of Chittorgarh, both by Islamic historians (Amir Khusrau, Ziauddin Barani, and Abdul Malik Isami) and later Rajput historians, which are in agreement about the length of the siege, the need for siege equipment, and the fact that the Mongols came knocking on the doors of Delhi before the Sultan could "vent his anger out" on Chittorgarh. The transitions of power, first towards Khizr Khan, and the second one towards Maladeva were both recorded in official imperial edicts, so all historians are in agreement with that as well.
      Here's the thing about history. Before the printing press was invented, books and edicts were handwritten, which would make them incredibly easy to damage, and preserved copies would be virtually nonexistent. So modern interpretation of history relies upon the threadbare evidence of records and edicts, and pieces it together with logical sequencing of the events, to get a full picture.

    • @singh_king3868
      @singh_king3868 Год назад +38

      @@xiayolevis6033 show me one historical fact that your ancestors were not my ancestors slaves...then I will show you Rani Padmavati's existence proof

    • @prabhatsourya3883
      @prabhatsourya3883 Год назад +60

      @@renn_u I am a research student. While this is not my exact subject, I still hold a personal interest in this end, so I just attempt to study the resources that I can find.

    • @Farishta_Bro
      @Farishta_Bro Год назад +13

      Yes absolutely you are correct I am also history student and I have done my PhD from JNU. The points your are saying are absolutely 100 % true according to history

  • @ShivaniSharma-ks8rk
    @ShivaniSharma-ks8rk Год назад +119

    The queens used to perform jauhar even after knowing it's the most painful way to die because the invaders used to be involved in necrophilia and so to protect their dignity even after being dead they used to jump in fire and am so proud of them❤❤

    • @sae311
      @sae311 Год назад +13

      Mfs didnt even leave children or young boys or dead bodies alone id rather die too

    • @NEO-v7r
      @NEO-v7r 17 дней назад

      Geez! I can't survive in middle ages 😭

  • @VVsupremacy
    @VVsupremacy Год назад +381

    I would not blame you guys for mistaking the first wife of the king to be his mother because the subtitles did not translate how both the queens addressed each other and their husband, the king - the first wife addressed Rani Padmavati as "Chhoti Rani" i.e. younger queen and she in turn addressed the first wife as "Badi Rani" i.e. elder queen. Also, throughout the movie they both addressed the king in words that would have suggested that he is the husband to both but the subtitles translated all of them as just "the king". So, I hope that by now you know that the character who you thought was queen mother was actually the king's first wife.
    And about the movie, everyone here has said enough, so I will just conclude by saying that Padmavat is one of the most grand films in India 🙏

    • @vamanayana
      @vamanayana Год назад +19

      True! The subtitles were making me mad lol

    • @theacechip
      @theacechip 10 месяцев назад +2

      even the queen mother (if ever) would have to address her son as king, because of the title and responsibility.

  • @nitishraghavannambiar9728
    @nitishraghavannambiar9728 Год назад +392

    That sword fight choreography between Shahid and Ranveer at the end just soo good

    • @prabhatsourya3883
      @prabhatsourya3883 Год назад +29

      As a person who studies history, I just love the fact that the fight was choreographed in a slow and smooth manner, with no stupid jumps or stunts. The shield and armour that the kings of that time would wear were VERY HEAVY. So movements in that armour would be slow. This choreography feels realistic keeping that in mind.

    • @hydragaming4265
      @hydragaming4265 6 месяцев назад +4

      @@prabhatsourya3883yeah and people like to see over the top Bahubali which is not even real

    • @ayshes9057
      @ayshes9057 Месяц назад

      ​@@hydragaming4265 yeah 😂😂

    • @NEO-v7r
      @NEO-v7r 17 дней назад

      That is the beauty of SLB

    • @NEO-v7r
      @NEO-v7r 17 дней назад

      ​@@hydragaming4265whats wrong with frictional story?

  • @ThatSBIPOguy
    @ThatSBIPOguy Год назад +176

    That's where subtitles can go so wrong, In Hindi dialect everything was obvious & can be easily understood but English subtitles messed it up for both Andrew & Steph. As for both the Queens, the subtitle read just Queen. Feel really bad for both that they thought the first Queen was actually Maharawal Ratan Singh's mother!

  • @mansi5403
    @mansi5403 Год назад +868

    Many people associate Jauhar (self immolation) with Sati (burning of wife after her husband death). Jauhar was performed by them as a choice that they'd rather die than being dishonored and enslaved (rape, marriage to the enemy etc) by the khilji bcz it is no hidden fact how women were treated under their reign that they'd rather choose death over submitting to them.
    Edit : madri did not perform sati. Sati was a practice to end the marital relationship in one birth and carried a belief that in afterlife they'll be born as the wife of the very same husband. What madri did had no intention of attaining afterlife, it was purely out of guilt and regret cuz she held herself somewhere responsible for death of her husband. She didn't burn herself...stop spreading Wikipedia info dude it's stupid in today's time.

    • @abhi.ku2432
      @abhi.ku2432 Год назад +1

      Islam also advocate for having sex with sex slaves or war booty.

    • @commanindic4574
      @commanindic4574 Год назад

      Fact is : Islamists do rape women dead body also... recently a Pakistani activist tweeted locked graveyard of a woman( so can nobody rape ) thiswhy Hindus women performed Jauhar in past

    • @mansi5403
      @mansi5403 Год назад +50

      @@riddunyra4373 wait no. It was practiced in bengal 'inspired' by the story of devi Sati (parvatis incarnation) self immolation after her father insulted her husband. She was in human form and humans have tendency of being attached and she was attached to her father even after he had insulted her and her husband (shiva) sh le had made many mistakes in form of a human so she thought that it was better to just leave that body and be born as parvati and learn everything from scratch. But sati practice were not there during the time ramayan and mahabharat. There were some upper class brahmins and women who started this just before mughal invasion.

    • @Krishna-lo9dt
      @Krishna-lo9dt Год назад +38

      It's not merely a poem . It's a true event in history. Alauddin Khilji was a real evil tyrant. The king of Chittor and Rani Padmini are also historical figures. You can still visit various forts of Rajasthan including the Chittorgarh Fort where Jauhar (self immolation) was done by brave Hindu women. And Hindu men and their whole armies would cover their bodies with the ashes of their wives and then go to the battlefield. This poignant event came to be known as Jauhar Saka. You can still visit these historical forts and the "jauhar kunds" where these events took place 500-800 years ago in several cities of state of Rajasthan. The reason why anybody would do it? It is simply because these mughal armies didn't even leave dead bodies of women alone , there were horrific events of what they did even with dead bodies. So Hindu women preferred self immolation to preserve their honor. It's a poignant tale in the history of Hindus of this land and a very brave one too

    • @mansi5403
      @mansi5403 Год назад +21

      @@riddunyra4373 and aryan invasion theory is already controversial whether it happened or not. I mean everyone are free to believe whatever they want but I personally don't believe in it. Proposing a theory on the basis of colour like dude really? It was simply a plan to divide north and south Indians acc to me. Or ppl can believe whatever they want.

  • @kunalmehta9679
    @kunalmehta9679 Год назад +703

    It is not mere a poem, it is a true reality.....hundreds of kshattranis had performed johar with the green goddess

    • @dhimankalita1690
      @dhimankalita1690 Год назад +17

      I appreciate how the makers turned this historical fictional story into such a wonderous movie. Everything about it was perfect. One of the best hostorical fictional character padmavati. Loved it

    • @kunalmehta9679
      @kunalmehta9679 Год назад +71

      @@dhimankalita1690 oh ...ya ...similar to Jodha Akbar ...how akbar was shown as a benevolent king ....such fictional....booo to bollywood

    • @archanavinod1
      @archanavinod1 Год назад +7

      Actually not....😂

    • @sanjaiyadav2080
      @sanjaiyadav2080 Год назад +21

      ​@@dhimankalita1690 chu slims a5s is burn!ng while seeing the reality.....

    • @sanjaiyadav2080
      @sanjaiyadav2080 Год назад +6

      ​@@archanavinod1 actually yes.😊

  • @saga38
    @saga38 Год назад +81

    The last 15 mins of climax scene is real goosebumps every time i watch this movie, with just background music and no dialogue, the last scene itself depicts the emotions behind the honor of being a rajput, you can understand only if you have lived with it or if you have ever studied this indian historical culture, the practice of Jauhar although has socially and legally ended but even today, the rajputs remember this brave act of queen padmavati

  • @OopsIDidItAgainUh
    @OopsIDidItAgainUh Год назад +75

    Since you guys had only praises for the music just like the rest of us here, I would like to mention that the movie director was the music director too - Sanjay Leela Bhansali! And before he started composing the music himself, he used to carefully select the music composers for his movies and worked with them. That's why, unlike many songs, most of his movies' songs are remembered with its video.

  • @tarass8737
    @tarass8737 6 месяцев назад +6

    As a hindu rajput the jauhar scene always gets me emotional. Some people try to criticize even that as hatred saying the Hindus were bigoted theyd rather be burned alive than be conquered by muslims but given what islamic conquerers did and are still in modern times known to do to captives of war if it comes to this today, I'd do this too like my ancestors. Your dignity is more important. What the left doesn't want to talk about is genocides and cruelties comitted by Islamic invaders but want to lecture hindus on even attempting to save the last ounce of their dignity or their dharma. We're literally the last surviving ancient civilization and they cant stand it the rest was all destroyed by the European Christians and arab muslims

  • @lord_draculs
    @lord_draculs Год назад +57

    Rani sa jo aag sa bhalka
    Rani sa badal sa garja
    Rani sa Rajpoot shaan hain
    Rani sa hmari aan baan hain

    • @dhimankalita1690
      @dhimankalita1690 Год назад +1

      I appreciate how the makers turned this historical fictional story into such a wonderous movie. Everything about it was perfect. One of the best hostorical fictional character padmavati. Loved it

    • @akshubh-be4yt
      @akshubh-be4yt 3 месяца назад

      @@dhimankalita1690 are you a fkin bot, commenting everywhere.

    • @dailyrandomvideos544
      @dailyrandomvideos544 22 дня назад

      @@dhimankalita1690queen padmavati was real and this really happened

  • @MSK_1996
    @MSK_1996 Год назад +114

    7:40 Ufff.. that music🤌🏼🥺 still gives me goosebumps even in a reaction video.. Damn SLB you nailed it🔥 What an epic masterpiece film👌🏼🔥🤩

  • @aditikulkarni4891
    @aditikulkarni4891 Год назад +36

    We had been to Chittorgarh few years back (much before movie came out). We took a guide who told us the story and also showed us the sites… it was so heartbreaking and at the same time fascinating for me. I didn’t know till then that something like Jauhar existed.. anyone who goes to Rajasthan should visit Chittorgarh .. it’s in ruins but is filled with history

  • @maneeshthakur6799
    @maneeshthakur6799 Год назад +157

    All hail to the Mother Queen Padmavati🙏🙏😭😭😭jai Rajputana 🚩🚩

  • @meetgandhi08
    @meetgandhi08 Год назад +347

    9:20 yes this movie is its own thing because its based on true story !!!!

    • @dhimankalita1690
      @dhimankalita1690 Год назад +7

      I appreciate how the makers turned this historical fictional story into such a wonderous movie. Everything about it was perfect. One of the best hostorical fictional character padmavati. Loved it

    • @masiullahchowdhury4554
      @masiullahchowdhury4554 Год назад +2

      ita not smh🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @ML-jw8kf
      @ML-jw8kf Год назад +18

      It is not based on a true real life event, but it is based on a fictional story

    • @petlyfwithhooman7601
      @petlyfwithhooman7601 Год назад +10

      ​@@dhimankalita1690it's not a fictional character

    • @davdamanthan
      @davdamanthan Год назад +6

      ​@@ML-jw8kflol no

  • @Neilz97
    @Neilz97 Год назад +24

    That was not his mother, she was her first wife.
    She sent the king to get her some precious pearls that could only be found in Singhal (the place where Deepika lived) and that's where he met Deepika.

    • @22aymon
      @22aymon Год назад +1

      Maybe they had no idea our kings used to have lots of wives 😅

  • @galimir
    @galimir Год назад +10

    I think Ranveer and Deepika met and their love story began during the shooting of Ram Leela.Its actually the second epic love story what began on sets of Sanjay Leela Bansali film.The earlier one was of Aishwarya Rai and Salman Khan(this one didnt end up well though,but still remembered and duscussed in India!)-Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam! Thats the power of true art I guess ❤❤

  • @siddharthpandey3783
    @siddharthpandey3783 Год назад +31

    The work done is absolutely Epic but yes..they take a lot of free hand to the original story!! That's why there was a lot of chaos on realising this movie in India! Rani Padmini i.e. Padmavati has a lot of respect in India!! And " Gora Badal " story alone can make a great Epic movie..and my opinion it should be!!

  • @d.eepak2002
    @d.eepak2002 Год назад +23

    It's not imaginary story it's based on a true incident...a historical movie.

  • @jacob9773
    @jacob9773 Год назад +15

    In Indian culture sacrificing oneself is tradition be it for the country or for family, this emotion is present through the country irrespective of religion or caste. This is what makes India great.

  • @sawanvashishth3127
    @sawanvashishth3127 Год назад +77

    As a grown ass man I burst in tears when i saw the jauhar seen I’m extremely proud Indian to see this where women can die instead of loosing self respect. I know the culture is being damaged in recent years but people will come and go but the roots the dynasties the legacy will remain the same. Thanks for reacting to this

    • @dOVERanalyst
      @dOVERanalyst Год назад +1

      Scene**

    • @aurkomukhopadhyay
      @aurkomukhopadhyay Год назад +4

      @@dOVERanalyst : 🤦🏽‍♂️ Bhawnao ko samjho 😂

    • @SodiumSyndicate
      @SodiumSyndicate Год назад +2

      It is an honor to be born in the wombs of such pure, chaste mothers.

  • @aviralgoyal942
    @aviralgoyal942 Год назад +5

    Many such incidents happened all over India in history. It might be just a poem but many similar true events also happened to save glory of women.
    This is India which believes in dying with honour than being a slave to enemy.

  • @SunilSinghss
    @SunilSinghss Год назад +5

    This was the dark time that shaped societies in northwest region of India. Remnants of that can still be seen. Ghunghat became compulsory because all that women was reduced to a thing to be conquered. Weddings are still held in night time. And much more...
    Thanks to these warriors of Dharma, India stands and lives.

  • @shreyasraut2892
    @shreyasraut2892 Год назад +9

    This is a true story from 1303, where Rani Padmavati did Johar(self immolation). It has also been mentioned in malik mohammad jayasi’s book in detail.

  • @ashwanidangi998
    @ashwanidangi998 Год назад +15

    The director of this movie was also the music director. His movies and music is next level

  • @thinleyzangmo9815
    @thinleyzangmo9815 Год назад +26

    She isn’t the mother guys. She is the first wife 😂

  • @jyothiraditya2878
    @jyothiraditya2878 Год назад +12

    Every actor also wants to act once in a Sanjay Leela Bhansali (director of this film) film because of his aesthetic working style and craft in filmmaking wherein every aspect of screenplay is done with conviction towards performance, even in those all costumes, action and grandeur; the director's most of the prime focus remains on the performances (because that's one of the main factor which symbolises period and epicness) of the actors which reflects on the screen and his focus on the minute details either it might be the body language and expressions of actors, to costumes, production design and art direction. One more thing which I like about Sanjay sir's film is the dialogues in the film, which are mostly unique, poetic and metaphoric, which audiences forget to mention and appreciate about.

  • @shubhsingh7574
    @shubhsingh7574 Год назад +10

    Sinhala Kingdom was the ancient name of Sri Lanka. Princess Padmawati was from there.
    Queen Padmawati was the second wife.
    In the beginning of the movie, it was 1st queen's parents who gifted unique Sinhalese (Sri Lankan) pearls to the King.
    It is not a movie just based on poem, it is from Indian history (13th-14th century).
    Due to many religious and cultural issues, the director choose to stick with the poem version.

  • @sonalikorgaonkar
    @sonalikorgaonkar Год назад +41

    Great reaction you guys. Just a feedback, when you are watching some time pieces like this one, it would be great if you could ask some of your indian friends for a little background without spoilers ofcourse . For eg. The relation between the characters, the queen you referred to as mother queen was actually his wife, as was padmavati, the ideology of different cultures and kingdoms like for eg. Rajputs are known for their Bravery pride and valour, their honesty integrity and values as you see the king displaying. It's not just a poem, it's a true story. It'll just help you get the whole gist of the movie and enjoy it.
    Just want to say that India has a history of great men and women 🇮🇳

  • @mileshul
    @mileshul 6 месяцев назад +4

    Actually Rani sa real name was *Rani Padmini* and not Padmavati. Thats the reason why this movie was not released in Rajasthan.
    In 2022 I had a blessing to visit her temple in Chittor. I was happy and sad at the same time. Happy becoz i was in the temple. Sad becoz the temple wasn't glorious enough.

  • @ruchiraghuvanshi7685
    @ruchiraghuvanshi7685 Год назад +9

    I visited the Chittorgarh fort a few years back and saw the sites where pivotal moments of this movie took place many centuries ago (for example the place where reflection of queen Padmavati was shown to Khilji). Although the movie is said to be based on a poem, the folklores suggest that this actually happened in history. The area where the queen performed jauhar with womenfolk of the palace is not accessible now. But, i could feel some eerie energy from beyond the locked doors.

  • @akagod4882
    @akagod4882 Год назад +80

    this was not copy pasted movie. It is a real story that happened and the characters in this movie are real. Padmavati was a real woman who was very beautiful and was called the most beautiful woman.

  • @jayakumari3973
    @jayakumari3973 Год назад +16

    Jauhar happened in real life. Its a true story. Poem was written on the true incident. But in true story before the conquest by khilji, two rajput ruler fought and died. After that to save themselves from Khilji Conquest and to defeat him morally, performed jahar. The spot they performed jauhar is now a famous tourist spot in india. Sati pratha, a cruel thing that was later abolished by raja ram mohan roy started because of such islamic conquest in India. They would rape and dishonor women and enslave them. Later it became kind of patriarchal thing. Which needed to be abolished.

    • @moviemarvel7450
      @moviemarvel7450 Год назад

      Raja Ram Mohan Roy was a British stooge and Christian missionary who cooked fake stories about Sati in order to convert "brown savages". Sati was rare occurrence. This fake story is as fake as British gave Indians independence because of an old man.

    • @redi6460
      @redi6460 Год назад +1

      Yes jauhar used to happen

  • @hazyhustler5022
    @hazyhustler5022 Год назад +8

    After this… if u visit india and in rajasthan in chittorgadh if u visit the fort and the place where actual jauhar took place.. u r gonna get goosebumps.. there r so many real stories of kings and forts here..u must visit india and look at this forts in real.

  • @avii377
    @avii377 Год назад +28

    SLB is the king of subtlety and slow burns, no unnecessary dialogues, very to the point and hitting, let the eyes and classical indian music do the talking!Imo Ranveer Singh's best performance till date! The historical accuracy in terms of costumes, music is sincere. Some fun facts: Deepika's outfit in the Ghoomar song was 40+ kgs! Also after this movie, she hiked up her fee and reportedly got paid more than her male co-stars in the film! The actors who played Queen Padmini ie Deepika and Khilji aka Ranveer are married in real life! Also one is almost shocked to believe that he is the same person who played Kabir in Dil Dhadakne Do and Bajirao in Bajirao Mastani!!! The power the man holds!! Overall the movie is a masterpiece, simple plot, all exaggerated to perfect balance with SLB's stunning cinematics!!!

  • @Krishna-lo9dt
    @Krishna-lo9dt Год назад +7

    It's not merely a poem . It's a true event in history. Alauddin Khilji was a real evil tyrant. The king of Chittor and Rani Padmini are also historical figures. You can still visit various forts of Rajasthan including the Chittorgarh Fort where Jauhar (self immolation) was done by brave Hindu women. And Hindu men and their whole armies would cover their bodies with the ashes of their wives and then go to the battlefield. This poignant event came to be known as Jauhar Saka. You can still visit these historical forts and the "jauhar kunds" where these events took place 500-800 years ago in several cities of state of Rajasthan. The reason why anybody would do it? It is simply because these mughal armies didn't even leave dead bodies of women alone , there were horrific events of what they did even with dead bodies. So Hindu women preferred self immolation to preserve their honor. It's a poignant tale in the history of Hindus of this land and a very brave one too

    • @aditisk99
      @aditisk99 Год назад

      Why would they do it before war? What if they won?

  • @vaidehiitaliya1373
    @vaidehiitaliya1373 Год назад +4

    This is called indian women and it's true story Proud to be indian and hindu 🕉

  • @lifer7230
    @lifer7230 Год назад +17

    The ariel shot of the Scenne with woman walking towards the fire, and the background score that played, will be one of the best shots in cinema history. That scene till date will give emotional eyes. Loved the reaction by you too. Hopefully you can watch other historic films like, Poniyan Selvan, Sye Raa Narasimha Reddy. You Sure would love them for the Drama that's been extracted. Also there's a film called Dasara,whichwould be a good watch for anyone on the channel. Lots of Love Guys💙💙💙

  • @monikajangra1999
    @monikajangra1999 Год назад +104

    We all were waiting for this last part😍😍😍😍

  • @AdityaJain_Adi
    @AdityaJain_Adi Год назад +5

    Whole story is real, I live in chittorgarh where this was happened, Maa padmini is our mother, she is an epitome of courage, sacrifice & righteous🙏

  • @essee3984
    @essee3984 Год назад +169

    If you read Akbarnama, his biography..Akbar 'the great', used to measure his success by the weight of Janeyu's (holy thread) collected from hose who were killed. From his Chittor conquest, he mentions he collected 3000 Kg of thread. One could only imagine the equivalent number of people that it translates to. And yet our historians consider him the most 'Secular and liberal' of the Mughals 🙃

    • @Zeus-ku3rj
      @Zeus-ku3rj Год назад

      He married his own mother, killed his uncle, slaughtered people even afternoon they were defeated, captured the women from places he won , and.formed a harem of 5000+ women and treated them as sex slaves what's funny is that her mothers sisters and relatives even wives all were in the same damn harem ,.goes to show how much respect the guy had for women!( It's a sarcastic comment for those dumb fucks who don't understand) Akbar was a cruel King , who won battles because of the damn population these Muslim guys have. Otherwise you really think these mad dogs haf the skill to win battles from rajputs, lohanads , Sikhs , Marathas?

    • @ashutosham1456
      @ashutosham1456 Год назад +12

      Suppose if 1 thread has mass around 10 grams then multiplying it into 1000 makes it 10000 grams (10 kgs) again multiplying it with Akbarnama 3000 kgs makes it 3,00,00,000 means Akbar killed 30 million people only from chittor?
      Does it make any sense? The history you're telling has already been interpreted by Cournal James Taud
      who has written most of Rajasthan's and India's history which is contradictory also and has written in his own motherland in England.

    • @academai3223
      @academai3223 Год назад

      Yet Hindus/Rajputs lined up to get their daughters into matrimony with Akbar's family to save their own skins.
      Kings like Ashoka also slaughtered, pillaged, and r@ped folks from other kingdoms, and this was before Islam.
      And he was called "great".
      The narrative keeps changing with time....don't believe your history books (especially labels). The simple logic is anyone with power exploited those without power. Religion had nothing to do with it. Another example is Mongol invasions...they didn't care about religion either.
      Japan did same thing to China (Nanking?), where both countries have Buddhist majority. Hitler didn't kill Christians?

    • @essee3984
      @essee3984 Год назад +45

      @@ashutosham1456
      1 kg = 1000g
      1000g/10g = 100 men
      3000kg = 3000 x 100 = 3 lakh
      Not sure how you reached 30 million.
      Might as well add that your assumption that 1 thread weighs 10g is also wrong, because the threads were wet soaked in blood so that adds additional mass.
      Besides, I'm not here arguing specifically on the exact number of people that suffered, but on how history has been whitewashed by a certain lobby to portray certain religious fanatics and invaders as secular messiahs and it's unfortunate that a large section of the indian population considers them their 'heros'

    • @mr.d-
      @mr.d- Год назад

      @@ashutosham1456 So Akbar boasted about the number of brahmins he killed ??

  • @vanrajthakor8349
    @vanrajthakor8349 Год назад +30

    It is not a poem it's golden chapter of Indian history. 1290-1320
    ⚔️Hail bhavani ⚔️

  • @royalrajput8127
    @royalrajput8127 Год назад +9

    We are proud of our warriors and Braveheart women who laid their life for their pride and respect... Respect for all warriors from all clans... Jay rajputana 🙏

  • @writerworld1111
    @writerworld1111 Год назад +63

    Actually, I Love "JAUHAR" As A Ritual In Back Days. I Cry Everytime, I Watch This Scene. I Mean The Dignity Of This Queen👑, No Words. This Scene Is Literally Epitome Of Masterpiece. And Above All, This Is A Real Scene.
    I Admire RANI PADMAAVATI so much. The Real Queen, We Had.

    • @vidhitiwari1478
      @vidhitiwari1478 Год назад +4

      I still love Jauhar, coz I know manu hindu women saved themselves through that in Kashmir.

    • @saywhat777
      @saywhat777 Год назад +9

      Who says they love Jauhar? “Love” seems like a strong word cuz in my opinion it was something they just had to do bcuz they didn’t have any other choice. It’s so sad to see them suffer. :(

    • @writerworld1111
      @writerworld1111 Год назад

      @@vidhitiwari1478 I said I love this Ritual. I know, it was a suffering for them. But Love Is A Suffering ❤️

    • @samhayet4286
      @samhayet4286 3 месяца назад

      @@writerworld1111 Yeah... Speak for yourself only and keep it that way. Not all of us want to "suffer" to prove we're in "love." That's ridiculous.

  • @nayeebG
    @nayeebG Год назад +9

    That scene of the Jauhar, I think even for the enemies it was an horrific sight to witness.

  • @sakshamkhanna6823
    @sakshamkhanna6823 Год назад +7

    Ironically the villian and queen are a real life couple 😂😂😂😂

  • @arulmittal9161
    @arulmittal9161 Год назад +4

    I've actually been to the place in Rajasthan where he saw padmavaat for the first time. It was a dome with a mirror on the front/top and behind there was a lake which had steps on the other end where she was standing. The place where this jauhar was performed is now converted into a garden

  • @CryptoFeeders
    @CryptoFeeders 11 месяцев назад +3

    This story is History, real history, way before Mughal Empire in India.

  • @Gaurav76831
    @Gaurav76831 Год назад +10

    The bgm of this makes this even more better

  • @Imurshivam
    @Imurshivam 2 месяца назад +2

    Extremely proud of our hindu rajput kings, its beyond imagination that how much courage and valour they hold. All hail rajputs, all hail india.

  • @sachinchhachhiya5547
    @sachinchhachhiya5547 Год назад +4

    If you don't know ranvir singh who played the character of khilji and Deepika Padukone who played the role of queen padmavati....in actual they are husband and wife....but their acting is Just 🔥

  • @aditfinance
    @aditfinance Год назад +8

    Steph and Andrew, if you guys loved to see Ranveer and Deepika in action, I suggest watching '83'. It's a cricket movie, though not knowing much about cricket won't stop you from enjoying the movie. Ranveer is absolutely amazing in this movie. Jaby and Syntell had reviewed it before, but I would enjoy watching both of you to react to it as well, after having seen Padmavat and Ram Leela.

  • @medicofilms9725
    @medicofilms9725 Год назад +18

    If tollywood has rajamauli then bwood has LORD bhanshali he had made masterpieces since beginning..I wish he direct RAMAYANA epic with his grand vision

    • @Sakshi_Gadge
      @Sakshi_Gadge Год назад +1

      But you know what? Indian Cinema has both of them😂
      Btw, both are epic directors.

    • @medicofilms9725
      @medicofilms9725 Год назад

      @@Sakshi_Gadge no it's for bycotters and bLind haters

    • @XxJANGRAxX
      @XxJANGRAxX Год назад +1

      U can't compare Sanjay Leela Bhansali with anyone

    • @medicofilms9725
      @medicofilms9725 Год назад

      @@XxJANGRAxX right

  • @Mohit_kr_Rajput
    @Mohit_kr_Rajput 10 месяцев назад +2

    “Our ancestors’ valor flows through our veins, reminding us to embrace every battle with grace.
    Our lineage is our strength, and our valor defines us as Rajputs.
    Proud to be a Rajput. ⚔️🚩

  • @poulomi__hari
    @poulomi__hari Год назад +2

    Haha, Ranveer and Deepika met 6 years before this movie, on the sets of another Bhansali film- Ramleela. Ranveer fell for soon after and I remember seeing him at a chat show with Karan Johar, how sensitive he used to get whenever her name was mentioned. I knew then and there that he'll marry her. Its more than 10 years now and they are still together, still crazy about each other. He continues to say how lucky he is to have her... They are such a power couple. Like Nick and Priyanka.

    • @aditisk99
      @aditisk99 Год назад +1

      Pretty sure he was crushing on her even before he entered the industry 😆

  • @B_A1020
    @B_A1020 Год назад +3

    Sanjay Leela Bhansali is famous for his tragedy movies,like 1942 a love story,khamoshi,ham Dil de chuke sanm,Devdash,black,gujarish,Raam Leela,sawariya,bajirao mastani, padmavat,gangubai etc❤️

  • @firozfirebox
    @firozfirebox Год назад +4

    Ranveer singh acting level is higher and higher

  • @MaheshSharma-kq3bl
    @MaheshSharma-kq3bl Год назад +2

    The range ranveer posses as actor is too good like frm dil dhadakne do, to padmavat to gully boy to simmba to lootera to Ram Leela to bajirao mastani this guy can literally do everything

  • @ayushpawar8952
    @ayushpawar8952 Год назад +2

    If both of you dont know, Alaudin's actor (Ranveer Singh) and Padmavati's actor (Deepika Padukon) are married couples, the movie came out before they were married.

  • @abhi_shek_saini
    @abhi_shek_saini Год назад +3

    Without a doubt my favorite Bollywood movie❤, it was first movie i watched in 3D, and i found its 3D effect better than most todays movies. I watched it with my family and it was first movie my grandmother watched in theater, I still remember her reaction watching Ostrich coming out of the screen 😂 in the starting of movie, and her emotions & indulgence at climax of movie. Now, she is no more 😔 and this movie will always be close to my heart.

  • @swiftie19200
    @swiftie19200 10 месяцев назад +3

    It's not just poem based it's the history. It actually happened which is devastating.

  • @himandrigawarle5676
    @himandrigawarle5676 9 месяцев назад +2

    Indian history is amazing, we feel proud that we born in Bharat. Our ancestors ❤

  • @jenniferlaurene9699
    @jenniferlaurene9699 Год назад +2

    It's not from Troy or anything. This is history.Rajput women were commiting Jauhar (sacrificing themselves to the fire) so they would not be captured by the enemies. India has a rich history. And a lot of filmmakers in the west take inspiration from such incidents and you would never know 🤷‍♂

  • @divyanshgupta5740
    @divyanshgupta5740 Год назад +14

    This isn't based only on a poem. Its real history. You can search "Johar kund" to see the actual place where Rani Padmini commited johar. The place even has hand sculptures of the women.

  • @jibran6299
    @jibran6299 Год назад +19

    Believe it or not I love ranveer in this role

    • @dhimankalita1690
      @dhimankalita1690 Год назад

      I appreciate how the makers turned this historical fictional story into such a wonderous movie. Everything about it was perfect. One of the best hostorical fictional character padmavati. Loved it

    • @AdityaCursed-vz4zs
      @AdityaCursed-vz4zs Год назад +3

      ​@@dhimankalita1690its historically accurate not fictional

    • @sahilmandlik7950
      @sahilmandlik7950 Год назад +2

      ​@Aditya Cursed not accurate completely

  • @simran.k23
    @simran.k23 Год назад +2

    Hey guys she was the first wife of the king not his mother

  • @seraphic1117
    @seraphic1117 Год назад +1

    The queen" She wasn't mother of king. She was elder queen. And first wife of king

  • @Ushi123
    @Ushi123 Год назад +14

    Khilji actually became the emperor of India and stabilised the Khilji Dynasty that ruled for three decades.

    • @intelligentakt3918
      @intelligentakt3918 Год назад +7

      Yes i think he was first bisexual king

    • @adityabhandari2977
      @adityabhandari2977 Год назад +2

      Dont say india cause his empire didnt rule all of india

    • @kapilazaan43
      @kapilazaan43 Год назад +1

      Also kept Gengis Khan from invading India

    • @sumo6199
      @sumo6199 Год назад

      Lol from where did you get India it was just the northern areas around delhi

    • @shauryaverma395
      @shauryaverma395 Год назад +2

      Thats a myth that he kept Gengis khan away, gengis khan passed away 20 years earlier correct your facts Kapil. Gengis khan was the greatest warlord who refused to invade India saying its the land of gods. He protected his khilji empire from few half hearted attacks not full blown invasions.

  • @myaatkins
    @myaatkins Год назад +8

    I can't believe they really thought she was the mother in law. Of course she would be mad about someone stealing the attention of her husband.

  • @werft
    @werft Год назад +2

    If you ever visit chittorgarh fort.... In those times there were almost 80 water ponds and there were agricultural fields within the fort itself so that if any enemy attacks the whole population can be accommodated within the fort itself to safeguard the women and the children specially because in those days of Delhi kings attacked someone they used to capture the women and kill or forced the male population to adopt their respective religions so the chittorgarh fort is a great example of how a perfect fort should be built . And that's why we Rajasthani people believe that ' gadhon me gadh chittorgarh' meaning a perfect fort.

  • @Dr.NidhiMishra
    @Dr.NidhiMishra 8 месяцев назад +1

    the parallels between the Troy and Padmavat are insane tho

  • @traveler3287
    @traveler3287 Год назад +3

    😮😮For your information this movie is based on real story of chittorgarh district of Rajasthan, India ❤❤
    You have to see the real story of the chittorgarh fort .
    Fact - It is said that The padmavati queen is so beautiful that you can see drinking water going through her throat ❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @Agent-57
    @Agent-57 Год назад +5

    I loved the chorography for Alauddin vs Ratan Singh (the king). That's how you do a sword and shield battle not the superhero bs in south. Proper stances, guards and swings.
    And the depiction of injuries. Alauddin's reaction to the cuts is very realistic, will power ain't gonna help you move when you are bleeding balls.

    • @usujitkumar5187
      @usujitkumar5187 Год назад

      Go & watch syraa naramsimha Reddy fight scene

    • @Agent-57
      @Agent-57 Год назад

      @@usujitkumar5187 Already did. How long has it been, I don't even remember.

    • @Fidah
      @Fidah Год назад

      The superhero bs is present in bollywood too not just south. It all depends of the kind of film (mass or realistic)

    • @Agent-57
      @Agent-57 Год назад +1

      @@Fidah That superhero BS was in Bollywood back in 2010. With movies like Dabbang and Singham.
      Even Ek Tha Tiger has proper choreography.
      Most bollywood movies have proper fight choreography after 2015 will only few exceptions.
      Meanwhile even the biggest of South movies have zero choreography.

    • @Fidah
      @Fidah Год назад +1

      @@Agent-57 but isn't it unfair to compare four different industries to one? Like, I'm a Malayali. All recent movies here have had decent, natural choreo (some really good ones asw) 🤷🏻‍♀️

  • @jageshwarsharma4059
    @jageshwarsharma4059 Год назад +2

    funfact- malik kafur later went on killing allauddin khilji (played by ranveer)

  • @TheNerdEngineer1
    @TheNerdEngineer1 Год назад +1

    It was the bravery of Indian people, mainly Hindus and Sikhs, against repeated invasions that occurred in northwest India.

  • @anntann2
    @anntann2 Год назад +3

    This isnt just “based” on a poem. This is based on a true story. These characters are real. The bare bones of the story are true.

  • @Lensandwheels_
    @Lensandwheels_ Год назад +6

    You two should watch Bajirao mastani. Same director and same cast combo ❤️

  • @ayushagarwal1749
    @ayushagarwal1749 Год назад +2

    This is a true story which was later treated as a poem. However there are 1000s of similar real stories from northen India. Ladies stopped fighting wars and opted for jauhar because of necrophilia of the invaders.

    • @AkankshaSharma-ex6eq
      @AkankshaSharma-ex6eq Год назад +1

      That's disgusting even Rani Laxmi bai after fighting with British she also decide to do the same.

  • @desmondprasad724
    @desmondprasad724 Год назад +2

    That place is still haunted,people still hear women screaming and still can smell ashes or something burning especially in evening or night time when people go by that place

  • @priyankamajumder2991
    @priyankamajumder2991 Год назад +8

    Go for any Sanjay Leela Bhansali movie that's a masterpiece ❤

  • @mayurnarayane
    @mayurnarayane Год назад +3

    And this is not just a movie.. It is a True Story!!! It's all real... It did happen

    • @jinfin221
      @jinfin221 Год назад

      It's fiction. Well the point the Allaudin wanted padmavti so bad that he waged a war is fiction lol

  • @akshaypareek6921
    @akshaypareek6921 Год назад +1

    In Chittorgarh there is a jauhar kund where the queen padmavati and her supporters martyred even today people reported listening the voice ecoes of them

  • @umersarfraz3151
    @umersarfraz3151 Год назад +1

    The Jayasi text describes her story as follows: Padmavati was an exceptionally beautiful princess of the Sinhalese kingdom (in Sri Lanka).[a] Ratan Sen, the Rajput ruler of Chittor Fort, heard about her beauty from a talking parrot named Hiraman. After an adventurous quest, he won her hand in marriage and brought her to Chittor. Ratan Sen was captured and imprisoned by Alauddin Khalji, the Sultan of Delhi. While Ratan Sen was in prison, the king of Kumbhalner Devapal became enamoured with Padmavati's beauty and proposed to marry her. Ratan Sen returned to Chittor and entered into a duel with Devapal, in which both died. Alauddin Khalji laid siege to Chittor to obtain. Facing a defeat against Khalji, she and her companions committed Jauhar (self-immolation) thereby defeating Devpal aim and protecting their honour. Coupled to the Jauhar, the Rajput men died fighting on the battlefield.

  • @maharshistudios
    @maharshistudios Год назад +3

    My moms name is Padmavati & I'm from south India. the name itself has a bigger origin. that's how deep our names and cultures are.
    movie is a magnum opus. unfortunately u guys missed on big screen.

  • @amaraambymohiuddin8625
    @amaraambymohiuddin8625 Год назад +25

    You guys are finally reacting to the biggest major scene in your last reaction 💖❤️♥️. So just a quick context about Jauhar that Padmavati mentioned earlier: It means self immolation, in other words, self suicide by jumping to your death on a funeral pyre. It’s almost similar to Sati - which is the act of drugging a woman and burn her alive with her husband’s dead body during cremation, as part of Hindu tradition of funeral during those time periods (luckily they don’t do that anymore 😌)
    Also if you notice all the women of Chittor wearing red and bridal dresses, signifying that they once came as a bride, they will die with honours as brides. As Padmavati mentioned that even the womenfolk are more powerful warriors than the men (based on the statement metaphor: even the bangles have more power and sound than the swords), the women choosing self immolation and death is an example of their bravery and also the true valour of being the ultimate female warriors. They chose to be with their husbands in the after life (since they took the sacred vows), they would rather choose death, instead of misery in enslavement and dishonour (being raped, mistreated cruelly) under the hands of the barbaric tyrants aka the Khiljis. This is primary example of women being the true Rajputi warriors! Do watch the climax and end of the movie, it will definitely give you goosebumps though, but for me, this is one proud and emotional scene about the bravery of how it feels like to be a true Rajputi woman 🫡💖 That’s how Rani Padmavati and the women are remembered in history like that 🫡

    • @SandipBajwa
      @SandipBajwa Год назад +1

      Sati and jauhar started with introduction of Islam into India. Rape, sexual slavery and plunder of non-muslims is a part of Islamic religion.

    • @dhimankalita1690
      @dhimankalita1690 Год назад +1

      I appreciate how the makers turned this historical fictional story into such a wonderous movie. Everything about it was perfect. One of the best hostorical fictional character padmavati. Loved it

    • @amaraambymohiuddin8625
      @amaraambymohiuddin8625 Год назад +1

      @@dhimankalita1690 I agree, and to be honest, whenever I watch this important scene, I definitely feel myself resonating the same emotions as them, as if I was there in my previous life as one of them and did Jauhar with them 🫢🫡, it was epic and emotionally brave

    • @MostIgn0red
      @MostIgn0red Год назад +3

      ​@@amaraambymohiuddin8625 it's real story not fictional

    • @amaraambymohiuddin8625
      @amaraambymohiuddin8625 Год назад +1

      @@MostIgn0red I know that it’s a real true story, and am glad SLB managed to bring that to life, despite the protests and problems he had to go through to bring it to life in the form of this movie!

  • @tannusingh5396
    @tannusingh5396 Год назад +1

    I just loved steph and Andrew reaction so much when they were so invested in the fight scene...

  • @user-pe6qx1jf4v
    @user-pe6qx1jf4v 5 месяцев назад +2

    That lady was salty towars deepika because she herself was the 1st queen of king of mewar and deepika was king's 2nd queen, not his mother 😂😂😭😭😭😭

  • @sardarnikaur6258
    @sardarnikaur6258 Год назад +4

    Sorry but it's not similar to the story of Helen of Troy. And it's not Aladdin..it's Alla Ud Din.

  • @litmus2450
    @litmus2450 Год назад +5

    I still didn't get , why this movie was boycotted 😅

    • @freefire8546
      @freefire8546 Год назад +1

      Coz they showed a scene where padmavati was showing her face to khilji which never happend but again they escaped as they made khilji character say that he didn't saw her face

  • @yaduvanshiashutoshkrishna
    @yaduvanshiashutoshkrishna Год назад

    All hail to Mother Padmavati …🥺💪🏻
    She protected Indian dignity n Values by sacrificing utmost of herself !
    We always will be grateful to her unprecedented bravery!❤️🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
    Jai Sanatan n Jai Sanatani Values 🚩🚩🚩❤️

  • @relaxingin4k19
    @relaxingin4k19 2 месяца назад +1

    They showed them moving towards the fire..but in real incident they actually jumped from height on fire.
    And in our Indian history there ate lots of unrealistic sounding stories of bravery and sacrifices which are unfortunately never told to our people because of political and ideological reasons.

  • @sana6557
    @sana6557 Год назад +3

    Clicked this video in the speed of light🤭

  • @pbhardwaj0812
    @pbhardwaj0812 Год назад +53

    This is controversial but i may say that in Islam intercourse with dead bodies is allowed.... you can find similar cases occuring right now in pakistan where people need to put locks on the graves of their sister, wives, daughters to protect them from this condition and that is the reason why jauhar was peformed cause it just turn the bodies to ash and dust.. and by this the enemey could not even see her and having intercourse is impossible.. by doing this our brave and courageous womens showed how strong they were that they just dedicated themselves to fire rather than having enemies touch their body and soul...

    • @Sandy-to7oo
      @Sandy-to7oo Год назад

      Islam doesn't allow 🙄 anal se*x itself, but it allows bestiality. Matlab kuch fela do.

    • @dhimankalita1690
      @dhimankalita1690 Год назад +1

      I appreciate how the makers turned this historical fictional story into such a wonderous movie. Everything about it was perfect. One of the best hostorical fictional character padmavati. Loved it

    • @ML-jw8kf
      @ML-jw8kf Год назад

      WTF f you, no such thing in Islam! I dare you to prove with evidence! That grave with a lock was debunked as fake news, the grave is from Hyderabad. On the contrary, in hinduism you have the ritual of having sex with dead horse.

    • @supernova652
      @supernova652 Год назад

      I agree that these things happen but did you verify before posting such news. Recently that news was found to be fake and a pic from Hyderabad and the lock was put due to other reasons.

    • @reshavgovindam1280
      @reshavgovindam1280 Год назад +1

      ​@@supernova652 bruh why would they research , research is ancient technique

  • @user-tv7ng2rl1p
    @user-tv7ng2rl1p 3 месяца назад +1

    its not only a poem, its our history as well, queen padmawati really did jhauhar in past

    • @thededro3352
      @thededro3352 3 месяца назад

      Padmavati story is fictional the historians have already confirmed it as well.

  • @Salimkhan-yf5ze
    @Salimkhan-yf5ze Год назад +2

    You should watch bajirao mastani same director and same actor all time great movie

  • @longfellow0
    @longfellow0 Год назад +3

    Jaby & Achara, before Steph and Andrew watches the movie, you are supposed to tell them that this story is a part of Indian history and it has happened for real even though cinematic liberties have been taken. It has nothing to do with Troy!
    Btw, Awesome reactions guys! Enjoyed watching this classic again with you guys.