sorry to be so off topic but does anybody know of a tool to log back into an instagram account? I was dumb lost the login password. I would appreciate any tips you can offer me!
Thank you for posting this summary. My wife and I were struggling to understand this concept for a class based on the instructor's lesson and this video was perfect! Thank you!
Thank you so much......College Anthro class has been talking about this for a week and all three of our textbooks were making things even more complicated. Your very simple breakdown was clear and right to the point, saved for exams!!! Thank you again!
1:17 Before he said "hats" I thought the concept of allomorph applied to both the "-s" of "dogs" and the "-ren" of "children". Could you say it actually applies or are they two separate morphemes with the same meaning?
I've seen it said that ablaut (like foot / feet) is also an allomorph of the plural morpheme. And that Latin declensions (e.g. plural dative endings -īs and -ibus) are allomorphs. But it would be nice if there were another word for when allomorphs are just phonologically conditioned (e.g. dogs / hats for -s, sneezed / picked / waited for -ed) vs actually being completely different in origin (like dog/dogs but also foot/feet and child/children).
Thank you so much Mr.NativLang .... Such an amazing Video!! U see .. i have linguistics exam tomorrow. And your videos helped me thanks again Wish me good luck.
Good example for a zero morpheme would be the genitive plural suffix in Russian for words that end in a vowel. The lack of any ending signifies plurality and genitive.
Wow, thank you so much for this video! I find it very helpful. One question on allomorphy: if "dog" has one morpheme and "dogs" has 2, then what about "man" and "men"? is this a case of allomorphy? what kind of inflection is this, regarding the fact that we do not have a suffix for plural? Thanks.
Yeah, you're welcome! Since the basic test for different morphemes (and other -emes) looks for a difference in meaning, we can separate the morpheme "man" from the morpheme "men". When sounds inside of a word mutate to produce different grammatical forms (instead of adding a prefix/suffix/infix), the change goes by the name "apophony". You might find allomorphs of "men", though. US speakers with the pin/pen (min/men?) merger might be a source of allomorphs.
***** Thanks! I'm still confused, I was actually thinking of stem homosemy in this case (man/men, mouse/mice). Or rather suppletion (as a colleague of mine tol me)?
Ary Bu Suppletion might not work in the man/men example for historical reasons. I think of the past tense form of GO as suppletive ("goes", "going", "gone"... but... "went" !?!). GO and WENT have separate etymologies - English took forms from one word ("wenden") and shoved them into another word's ("gon") grammatical paradigm. However, man/men did not take its forms from another lexical item. Consider the history of English and Germanic. Initially, Germanic mann- took a regular plural ending -iz: *mann-iz. That little "i" influenced the pronunciation of the root "a" (assimilation, more specifically, Germanic "Umlaut"). For comparison, these are the German words for man/men: Mann, Männer (roughly pronounced Menner). Unlike German, English lost the plural noun ending on "men". That loss obscured the etymology of "men", giving the impression that the only factor is a vowel switch. English now has internal inflection where Germanic once had a suffix morpheme + assimilation in the root morpheme. Now we have three analyses: 1 morpheme analysis: "men" (unbreakable, and means something different than "man") "mice" (unbreakable, and means something different than "mouse") 2 morpheme analysis, using Germanic ROOT + UMLAUT: "man" + UMLAUT = "men" "mouse" + UMLAUT = "mice" Historical analysis, using suffix > assimilation > apocope: mann + iz > menn + iz > men When it comes to stem homosemy, "man" and "men" may belong to the same lexeme. But basic definitions of allomorph do not allow for changes in meaning, so "man" and "men" don't work like allomorphs of the same morpheme would. I hope this makes things a bit clearer (well, as clear as Umlaut can be... sheesh!).
Thanks a lot! It helped a lot! I understand your point with Umlaut, as I am a native speaker of German, but I haven't thought of "man vs. men" like that, so thanks again!
Hi, thanks for the video. It is really helping :) but I wanna ask you: what is the different between morph and morpheme? an introduction of linguistics by george yule mention that morphs as the actual forms used to realize morphemes, and Im confuse now. please explain it. thank you (again) ^^
George Yule seems to say that morphemes are single abstract units (an underlying concept), while morphs are the actual things you speak (the various ways a morpheme gets pronounced). This is very much in line with the traditional approach to morphology. When there are multiple morphs for a single morpheme (multiple ways to pronounce it), that's when Yule calls them "allomorphs" - Greek for "other forms". Otherwise a "morpheme" just has a "morph" - a single way to pronounce it. Let's map Yule's difference between "morpheme" and "morph"/"allomorphs" to my video: In this video, the concept (the morpheme) "dog" has the real-life pronunciation (the morph) [dɑːg]. Since there are no other morphs for that morpheme (no other ways to pronounce it), it has no "allo" (other) "morphs" (forms).
Could an example of a null morpheme be the Icelandic word "fiskur", where the accusative form is "fisk"; thus the lack of a ending marks the case, while the "-ur" ending marks the nominative?
+Officialhelpkenet I think that analysis fits the paradigm. There's historical support behind that accusative morpheme eroding even while the good people of Iceland still differentiate the accusative grammatically!
I feel like someone just smacked me in the forehead with a grammar textbook and somehow, the information stuck. I can’t imagine a more enjoyable form of assault 😂♥️
What if instead of 'to the person' you'd write 'totheperson'? Would you call English agglutinative then? Do we label languages analytic or synthetic based on spelling? Why? Why should spelling play a role?
German weak past participles are sometimes analyzed this way: root sag- 'say' + circumfix ge-_-t = ge-sag-t 'said'. Classical Tibetan has the past tense b-(verb)-s. Hope these help!
I m study colleg of Art department of English language I liked your explanation because the language understandable sory if my words not clear because I speak Arabic and my language in English weak thanks again
![[Introduction to Linguistics] Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes, and Morphological Changes](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UiYPVP9Hb7M/mqdefault.jpg)
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
That's very kind. Thank you for watching!
Very helpful six minutes , it took my teacher 3 hours of explanation thus I didn't get it a clue. Thank you soo much for simplifying such a lesson.
Siham Kouram These are tricky concepts - thanks for letting me know how much this helped!
sorry to be so off topic but does anybody know of a tool to log back into an instagram account?
I was dumb lost the login password. I would appreciate any tips you can offer me!
In these six minutes, I learnt more about languages, than I had learnt in 30 years.... woooow, brilliant!!!!
Thank you for posting this summary. My wife and I were struggling to understand this concept for a class based on the instructor's lesson and this video was perfect! Thank you!
I fall in love with ur voice 😍😭
Thank you so much......College Anthro class has been talking about this for a week and all three of our textbooks were making things even more complicated. Your very simple breakdown was clear and right to the point, saved for exams!!! Thank you again!
It's more clear now, thank you so much !
I'm studying for my finals from your vids. Awesome.
Excellent, thanks!
(this is the reason why i become a chairman in morphology class ) :v
Thank you very much sir :)
1:17 Before he said "hats" I thought the concept of allomorph applied to both the "-s" of "dogs" and the "-ren" of "children".
Could you say it actually applies or are they two separate morphemes with the same meaning?
I've seen it said that ablaut (like foot / feet) is also an allomorph of the plural morpheme.
And that Latin declensions (e.g. plural dative endings -īs and -ibus) are allomorphs.
But it would be nice if there were another word for when allomorphs are just phonologically conditioned (e.g. dogs / hats for -s, sneezed / picked / waited for -ed) vs actually being completely different in origin (like dog/dogs but also foot/feet and child/children).
Thank you so much Mr.NativLang .... Such an amazing Video!!
U see .. i have linguistics exam tomorrow. And your videos helped me thanks again
Wish me good luck.
I hope you do great! Thank you for leaving this nice comment!
Thank you ... And you are most welcome.
Your videos are amazing, interesting and fun, thank you!
Thank you thank you thank you very much ..sincerly it was so helpful !
Thank you for your great explanation, everything is clear now.
That's really amazing ..very very helpful...thank u so much👍👍👍
Thank you so much for explaining in a undertandable way! :')
this awesome video is really worth watching. it helped a lot
it's very informative series and beneficial. thanks indeed
Good example for a zero morpheme would be the genitive plural suffix in Russian for words that end in a vowel. The lack of any ending signifies plurality and genitive.
thank you this lesson was so helpful
Thanks you so much. It's clear and easy to understand.
Honestly you are better than my doctor in explanation 😅
It look like Dracula became a Linguistic , awesome video
nice lesson. should read creepypasta with that voice lmao
+rockleah18 That scary, huh? Hah, then I'm in the wrong line of work!
It's too helpful thank u sooooooo much🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦❤️
Is the _Native Grammar_ book still available anywhere? If not, will it be back at some time in the future?
Thank you!
Thanks for your video!!! It's really helpful for me to learn morphology.
You're so very welcome. Thanks for watching!
Awesome! Congratulations!
Wow, thank you so much for this video! I find it very helpful. One question on allomorphy: if "dog" has one morpheme and "dogs" has 2, then what about "man" and "men"? is this a case of allomorphy? what kind of inflection is this, regarding the fact that we do not have a suffix for plural? Thanks.
Yeah, you're welcome!
Since the basic test for different morphemes (and other -emes) looks for a difference in meaning, we can separate the morpheme "man" from the morpheme "men".
When sounds inside of a word mutate to produce different grammatical forms (instead of adding a prefix/suffix/infix), the change goes by the name "apophony".
You might find allomorphs of "men", though. US speakers with the pin/pen (min/men?) merger might be a source of allomorphs.
*****
Thanks! I'm still confused, I was actually thinking of stem homosemy in this case (man/men, mouse/mice). Or rather suppletion (as a colleague of mine tol me)?
Ary Bu Suppletion might not work in the man/men example for historical reasons. I think of the past tense form of GO as suppletive ("goes", "going", "gone"... but... "went" !?!). GO and WENT have separate etymologies - English took forms from one word ("wenden") and shoved them into another word's ("gon") grammatical paradigm. However, man/men did not take its forms from another lexical item.
Consider the history of English and Germanic. Initially, Germanic mann- took a regular plural ending -iz: *mann-iz. That little "i" influenced the pronunciation of the root "a" (assimilation, more specifically, Germanic "Umlaut"). For comparison, these are the German words for man/men: Mann, Männer (roughly pronounced Menner).
Unlike German, English lost the plural noun ending on "men". That loss obscured the etymology of "men", giving the impression that the only factor is a vowel switch. English now has internal inflection where Germanic once had a suffix morpheme + assimilation in the root morpheme.
Now we have three analyses:
1 morpheme analysis:
"men" (unbreakable, and means something different than "man")
"mice" (unbreakable, and means something different than "mouse")
2 morpheme analysis, using Germanic ROOT + UMLAUT:
"man" + UMLAUT = "men"
"mouse" + UMLAUT = "mice"
Historical analysis, using suffix > assimilation > apocope:
mann + iz > menn + iz > men
When it comes to stem homosemy, "man" and "men" may belong to the same lexeme. But basic definitions of allomorph do not allow for changes in meaning, so "man" and "men" don't work like allomorphs of the same morpheme would.
I hope this makes things a bit clearer (well, as clear as Umlaut can be... sheesh!).
Thanks a lot! It helped a lot! I understand your point with Umlaut, as I am a native speaker of German, but I haven't thought of "man vs. men" like that, so thanks again!
Ary Bu
My pleasure! Glad the answer helped even though it's so looooong...
Thank you! Well-explained!
Thank you so much ..it was very helpful
hi thank u so much for the video .. could you please tell me what is a morphophonemic process ? i'm really confused and thank u in adv
Thank you for this video, it's very clear! It really helped me understand this basic components of morphology for my linguistic test! :)
That's a kind and helpful message to pass along. I hope yo do well on that test!
this video is an awesome one 😍..thanks very much
it's very useful. Thank you so much!
Thank you for watching!
Awesome introduction! Could you tell the name of the background music?
Awesome! Thanks for posting.
Hi, thanks for the video. It is really helping :) but I wanna ask you: what is the different between morph and morpheme? an introduction of linguistics by george yule mention that morphs as the actual forms used to realize morphemes, and Im confuse now. please explain it. thank you (again) ^^
George Yule seems to say that morphemes are single abstract units (an underlying concept), while morphs are the actual things you speak (the various ways a morpheme gets pronounced). This is very much in line with the traditional approach to morphology.
When there are multiple morphs for a single morpheme (multiple ways to pronounce it), that's when Yule calls them "allomorphs" - Greek for "other forms". Otherwise a "morpheme" just has a "morph" - a single way to pronounce it.
Let's map Yule's difference between "morpheme" and "morph"/"allomorphs" to my video:
In this video, the concept (the morpheme) "dog" has the real-life pronunciation (the morph) [dɑːg]. Since there are no other morphs for that morpheme (no other ways to pronounce it), it has no "allo" (other) "morphs" (forms).
This was great thank you!!!
Helpful
thanks a lot
keep up the good work
Could an example of a null morpheme be the Icelandic word "fiskur", where the accusative form is "fisk"; thus the lack of a ending marks the case, while the "-ur" ending marks the nominative?
+Officialhelpkenet I think that analysis fits the paradigm. There's historical support behind that accusative morpheme eroding even while the good people of Iceland still differentiate the accusative grammatically!
Thank U for this helpful video, could U plz talk about " what is zero morpheme " ?!😄
3:34 surprised you found it lol
all jokes aside this was super helpful
Good job !
Thank u💜
You're very welcome!
thank you very much
شكرا لك.
I feel like someone just smacked me in the forehead with a grammar textbook and somehow, the information stuck. I can’t imagine a more enjoyable form of assault 😂♥️
Thank you.
You're welcome!
What if instead of 'to the person' you'd write 'totheperson'? Would you call English agglutinative then? Do we label languages analytic or synthetic based on spelling? Why? Why should spelling play a role?
Do you know an example for an circumfix?
German weak past participles are sometimes analyzed this way: root sag- 'say' + circumfix ge-_-t = ge-sag-t 'said'. Classical Tibetan has the past tense b-(verb)-s. Hope these help!
thanks very much Im from Iraq
+يبليبليبل يبليبليبل Your words traveled from far away. Thank you for watching, and for leaving a comment!
I m study colleg of Art department of English language I liked your explanation because the language understandable sory if my words not clear because I speak Arabic and my language in English weak thanks again
No, I understand. I'm happy it was clear. Shukran!
its more than great
I'll chose linguistics because of you hhh thank you
very good
Thank you
You're very welcome!
Thank you very much:)))
My pleasure - such a fun topic. I'm glad you subscribed for more language!
omg thankyou for the clarification
thank u Sir
Allomorph???
How about the difference between MORPHEMES and MORPHS...PERIOD
English: A dog.
Swedish: What?
English: The dog.
English: Two dogs.
Swedish: Okay. We have: En hund, hunden, Två hundar, hundarna.
German: Wait, I want to try it too!
English: No, go away.
Swedish: No one invited you.
German: Der Hund.
English: I said go away....
German: Ein Hund, zwei Hunde.
Swedish: Stop it!
German: Den Hund, einen Hund, dem Hund, einem Hund, des Hundes, eines Hundes, den Hunden, der Hunden.
Finnish: Me too...
English: NO. Swedish: NO. German: NO. Finn, you go away!!
Finnish: Koira, koiran, koiraa, koiran again, koirassa, koirasta, koiraan, koiralla, koiralta, koiralle, koirana, koiraksi, koiratta, koirineen, koirin.
German: WHAT?
Swedish: You must be kidding us!
English: This must be a joke...
Finnish: Aaaand... koirasi, koirani, koiransa, koiramme, koiranne, koiraani, koiraasi, koiraansa, koiraamme, koiraanne, koirassani, koirassasi, koirassansa, koirassamme, koirassanne, koirastani, koirastasi, koirastansa, koirastamme, koirastanne, koirallani, koirallasi, koirallansa, koirallamme, koirallanne, koiranani, koiranasi, koiranansa, koiranamme, koirananne, koirakseni, koiraksesi, koiraksensa, koiraksemme, koiraksenne, koirattani, koirattasi, koirattansa, koirattamme, koirattanne, koirineni, koirinesi, koirinensa, koirinemme, koirinenne.
English: Those are words for a dog???
Finnish: Wait! I didn't stop yet.
There is still: koirakaan, koirankaan, koiraakaan, koirassakaan, koirastakaan, koiraankaan, koirallakaan, koiraltakaan, koirallekaan, koiranakaan, koiraksikaan, koirattakaan, koirineenkaan, koirinkaan, koirako, koiranko, koiraako, koirassako, koirastako, koiraanko, koirallako, koiraltako, koiralleko, koiranako, koiraksiko, koirattako, koirineenko, koirinko, koirasikaan, koiranikaan, koiransakaan, koirammekaan, koirannekaan, koiraanikaan, koiraasikaan, koiraansakaan, koiraammekaan, koiraannekaan, koirassanikaan, koirassasikaan, koirassansakaan, koirassammekaan, koirassannekaan, koirastanikaan, koirastasikaan, koirastansakaan, koirastammekaan, koirastannekaan, koirallanikaan, koirallasikaan, koirallansakaan, koirallammekaan, koirallannekaan, koirananikaan, koiranasikaan, koiranansakaan, koiranammekaan, koiranannekaan, koiraksenikaan, koiraksesikaan, koiraksensakaan, koiraksemmekaan, koiraksennekaan, koirattanikaan, koirattasikaan, koirattansakaan, koirattammekaan, koirattannekaan, koirinenikaan, koirinesikaan, koirinensakaan, koirinemmekaan, koirinennekaan, koirasiko, koiraniko, koiransako, koirammeko, koiranneko, koiraaniko, koiraasiko, koiraansako, koiraammeko, koiraanneko, koirassaniko, koirassasiko, koirassansako, koirassammeko, koirassanneko, koirastaniko, koirastasiko, koirastansako, koirastammeko, koirastanneko, koirallaniko, koirallasiko, koirallansako, koirallammeko, koirallanneko, koirananiko, koiranasiko, koiranansako, koiranammeko, koirananneko, koirakseniko, koiraksesiko, koiraksensako, koiraksemmeko, koiraksenneko, koirattaniko, koirattasiko, koirattansako, koirattammeko, koirattanneko, koirineniko, koirinesiko, koirinensako, koirinemmeko, koirinenneko, koirasikaanko, koiranikaanko, koiransakaanko, koirammekaanko, koirannekaanko, koiraanikaanko, koiraasikaanko, koiraansakaanko, koiraammekaanko, koiraannekaanko, koirassanikaanko, koirassasikaanko, koirassansakaanko, koirassammekaanko, koirassannekaanko, koirastanikaanko, koirastasikaanko, koirastansakaanko, koirastammekaanko, koirastannekaanko, koirallanikaanko, koirallasikaanko, koirallansakaanko, koirallammekaanko, koirallannekaanko, koirananikaanko, koiranasikaanko, koiranansakaanko, koiranammekaanko, koiranannekaanko, koiraksenikaanko, koiraksesikaanko, koiraksensakaanko, koiraksemmekaanko, koiraksennekaanko, koirattanikaanko, koirattasikaanko, koirattansakaanko, koirattammekaanko, koirattannekaanko, koirinenikaanko, koirinesikaanko, koirinensakaanko, koirinemmekaanko, koirinennekaanko, koirasikokaan, koiranikokaan, koiransakokaan, koirammekokaan, koirannekokaan, koiraanikokaan, koiraasikokaan, koiraansakokaan, koiraammekokaan, koiraannekokaan, koirassanikokaan, koirassasikokaan, koirassansakokaan, koirassammekokaan, koirassannekokaan, koirastanikokaan, koirastasikokaan, koirastansakokaan, koirastammekokaan, koirastannekokaan, koirallanikokaan, koirallasikokaan, koirallansakokaan, koirallammekokaan, koirallannekokaan, koirananikokaan, koiranasikokaan, koiranansakokaan, koiranammekokaan, koiranannekokaan, koiraksenikokaan, koiraksesikokaan, koiraksensakokaan, koiraksemmekokaan, koiraksennekokaan, koirattanikokaan, koirattasikokaan, koirattansakokaan, koirattammekokaan, koirattannekokaan, koirinenikokaan, koirinesikokaan, koirinensakokaan, koirinemmekokaan, koirinennekokaan.inemme, koirinenne.
English: that's a lot of dogs..
Finnish: And now the plural forms..
You sound different here than later on.
i see agglutinative, i think me (Hungarian). heheh
thank you so much
Thank you.
Thank you
Of course!