The US was going to use a low yield (few hundred kt) nuclear bunker buster in Afganistan 2001, but when the media found out about it, the project was cancelled. It was going to be either a B61-11 EPW (earth penetrating weapon) or a newer RNEP (robust nuclear earth penetrator) weapon. The main design problem with nuclear bunker busters is that the nuclear component can't handle the stress of penetrating more than 10 meters of reinforced concrete. I'm sure they have gotten around that problem during the past 20 years.
Because kinetic energy is more efficient against concrete, it's not hardened steel. Firing a standard FMJ steel bullet will make a bigger dent against concrete than the same bullet with some sort of an elaborate shaped charge.
They aren't that accurate to hit the same exact hole. The weapon depends on the pressure build up when detonated within a closed space and that isn't going to happen if there is a huge crater at the impact site.
@@glandhound Recent Israeli operations showed successive strikes on one target using precision Penetration Ordinance, there are clearly varying degrees of "accuracy" when it comes to these Weapons Systems.
The GBU 57 for example, can penetrate 200' of hardened concrete. Weighing in at 30,000 lbs., this bunker buster has a warhead weighing 5,740 lbs. The warhead will go off at the depth it's set to penetrate previously to detonation. It's affectionately referred to as the MOP, or Massive Ordnance Penetrator. These are the likely weapons used on the Houthis, as well as the gift to Nasrallah. It's well to note that one doesn't necessarily need to fully destroy the bunker it's attacking, rather, it can completely remove the air from the space of said bunker, as in the case of the killing of Nasrallah in Lebanon. It was determined that while in his little space where he physically survived, he actually asphyxiated as the air was removed from the space by the explosions that cut off air flow to the said bunker. This reasoning can be applied to the destruction of Iran's deeply buried nuclear facilities, some of which are said to be located under a mountain. One need only destroy the entrances to the said bunkers, as the result would be the turning of these bunkers into actual tombs for anyone working there, as well as a method of containing radiation released locally from the destruction of their centrifuges, and other equipment that's sole purpose is to enrich the Uranium to bomb making percentages. I still think that Israel will in effect, disregard Biden's directives that Israel should not attack Iran's nuclear plants and plans to develop a bomb. Turning their facilities into tombs will do quite nicely, don't you think? For Israel not to destroy Iran's capability to make a nuclear bomb would go completely against their mission to survive, given that Iran has stated quite openly on many an occasion that its mission is to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth, and every Jew with it.
Bunker Busters were designed in only 10 days. Sadam Hussain had a concrete bunker 50 feet deep in sand. We took old artillary canons made with specialized alloys from WW2. Tjey were heated, rolled, proportioned and filled with explosives. The bunker buster bomb was designed by nessesity. Just like Mr. Miagi said in the karate kid, "If do right, no can defense!"
@@moa4721 That's what they all say, I men "said". Past tense. It doesn't need to go through it, just near it. Nazrallah choked to death on toxic fumes. You're obviously not a civil engineer. There's pipes and vents and shit. 🤦
modern ordinance is accurate enough, you could stack strike after strike on top of each other to work your way down deeper. That being said though, even if you don't completely destroy a target, by completely burying it, you could still turn a bunker into a tomb.
Do not overestimate the bunker buster capabilities. There is no metal known to us that can sustain the impact of very hard material. However, it works on concrete if the force applied to the concrete horizontally, not vertically.
Unlike Lebanon, Iran has robust anti-air systems + hypersonic missiles that Israel can't intercept... Lebanon is unprotected from the sky, just like Ukraine after losing all air defence US and NATO provided, and the result is seen.
@@Putin-man Ah, yes, Iran’s ‘unstoppable’ hypersonic missiles and ‘impenetrable’ bunkers. Clearly, the world's superpowers are quaking in their boots, right? I mean, who needs decades of advanced American military tech and bunker-busters designed to take out facilities far more fortified than anything Iran can dream up? It's almost cute how you’ve bought into the hype. Guess what-hypersonic missiles aren't some magic bullet that bypasses every defense system. And those bunkers? The U.S. has been designing weapons to crack open far tougher nuts for years. But sure, keep thinking Iran has outmatched one of the most technologically advanced militaries on the planet. Sounds like someone’s been reading a bit too much state-sponsored propaganda.
I think one underestimates the 'quality' of the shockwave, so even if, say, the last layer (bottom most) of 2' thich concrete survives, the blast wave would kill all occupants inside, wouldnt it?
Already they use one penetrator bomb followed precisely with another that starts it's penetration at the bottom of the whole the first one made. It's shown to be the most effective. I wonder if they could do it with 3 or even 4 stages. The forth bomb starting it's penetration after three penetrations before it I would think that would deny any bunker a chance at all
That's a good strategy plus trolling the enemies 😂 but, Delivering the Bomb exactly at the same spot could be a challenge.. It sounds good theoretically but we don't know how practical it is 😅
Daisy Cutters was America's first MOAB. Surface work clearing landing zones in Vietnam. It was used all the way up to 2008 in Afghanistan until it was replaced by the current MOAB. It's not a bunker buster.
All this can happen because international law has no real enforcement its just the name of a complex set of agreements between countries that have never been obeyed.
So then how are all these terrorists out and about targeting meat eaters? Obviously these weapons have not done their job in putting any fear in the hearts of the enemy.
easy - just make somewhat strong roof and very weak floor. if bonb goes through it buries itself 100m in a soft sand (I needed to use "bonb" because my comment didn't post otherwise)
Most of these groups they suddenly felt empowered because they thought they found a new form of concrete and or utilization of it for making bunkers. This was on this platform a couple of years ago. I immediately told them this wasn't the case and that it would be defeated. And I'm betting that's where the Iranian King is right now. Is behind something that's going to act like a closed fist except he's in the closed fingers thinking he's safe in that bunker. He's not😅😅😅😅😅 #iscreenshot I retain all rights to my intellectual property. Which includes the right to sue for damages such as algorithm modifications or deletion
🕉 Satyameva Jayate: Truth and Honesty and Reality of possibilities need to be experimented as materials that are available nowadays probably will be lighter - However, Their strengths will be greater - Composite materials that use carbon fibre in casings will probably hold the ‘Tonnage’ weight of the explosive components… Woking on this design will need a penetrating ‘frontend’ of dense-solid that has been reinforced like they do in ‘Stressed-concrete’ blocks… I envisage the outer casings of carbon fibre to be like ‘onion-layers’ that would ‘peel’ off as the projectile penetrating deeper and deeper… The use of Rockets to assist in this drilling-down have to create a ‘helical-twist’ that sort of screws-n-twist at a relatively high-speed (independent of the own-ward slicing that the frontend or ‘the needle-point’ of the ‘tip’)… Look, My mind-experiment is really using the basic design of a ‘Golf-pin’ which when it gets pressed into the ground has a specific shade that helps ‘slide’ in without much effort… Hence, when i say there has to be a ‘spiralling action’ as well - what I mean is one sees this in a ‘Rifle’ that increases the accuracy because the twist gives the spinning ‘bullet’ a well planned path to follow… Hence, my design takes several of the well known effects associated with principle os projectile and their travel through ‘materials’… There is air, there is solid rock-soil-Concrete (reinforced with metal rebars etc)… Hence, as the suggest design has the least resistant head made from very dense ‘heavy metal like spend Uranium’ that has a very sender ‘pin-like’ shape - I add composite ‘panels’ in onion-layers that will ‘peel’ off as the ‘needle’ is penetrating as well the friction will be reduced as the carbon composite panels will be where the ‘spinning’ will get it ‘lubricated-space’… The very dark solid barrel of a Gun-from-the-tank will be forged in layers with circular cylinders that have been ‘telescoped’ into perhaps 4 tubes - The ‘stressed’ cables will really be ‘wrapped’ around each forged barrel… finally , the single tube of metal with its 4 tubes will be stood up or be held vertically… This is when The molten high tensile steel will be poured into the hole… Thus, the long heaven mid section will retain the ‘straightness’ (notice when one hammers a long six inch nail into timber the back-end of the nail often bends at the mid-point and the nail really ends up in the wood as a bent nail - This is what the design I have suggested will avoid when it hits the different ‘material’ underground)… Hell, I think the rockets in the tail end will be spinning this damn penetrating so fast there will be very little time before the hole is covered over by the debris… Therefore, The casing panels that have been peeled off will likely to create a ‘selieve’ through which the metal will simply slide… I have not worked out how the wide ‘Acorn-type’ shape at the rear will behave under The soil… I need to look at the experiments that study the projectile that hit at an impact of 90 degrees verticals as well at 60 degrees etc… before, I am satisfied about the behaviour of the backend of the penetrating needle - My mind is made up… This design will give a very deep reach for the explosive component to do the maximum destruction… What do you think?… As for the Mathematical equations - and that sort of proofs - I have to sit down and work the various factors that are involved… Next comes the considerations of delivering the weapon… I think I will use that Transport Cargo plane - Place this heavy beast on a sledge-slide - open the rear cargo door - give it a push and a small parachute to pull it out - next with assistance from another bigger parachute make it vertically hanging i.e. to make it very vertical over the target - detach the parachute - and see this baby plunge into the targeted bastrads who are hiding in the deep bunker - They will have no chance to escape… BAMB … Satyameva Jayate
Watch the video about the Mother of all bombs: ruclips.net/video/8m4TlVSQ8As/видео.html
"Meters of sand, stone, and concrete are simply the distance to the target." That kinda goes hard, I like it
Very prescient to upload this video BEFORE Nasrallah hit.
He's smoking a turd in hell right now.
I hope we continue development of these & more powerful versions, We have to stay ahead of our adversaries.
Nasrallah just found out
👀
😂
Yes he did!
Khameini next😂
They would most likely make the tips of those bombs out of depleted uranium like they do with the armor piercing rounds on the a ten
No need. Just use a conical shaped charge. Like the German Taurus.
the timing of this video is really conspicuous and alarming 🤔🤔🤔
Lol😂
😂😂
It is a bad copy and paste job from older and much better videos
What channel?@@amblincork
well that was two replacements ago
The US was going to use a low yield (few hundred kt) nuclear bunker buster in Afganistan 2001, but when the media found out about it, the project was cancelled. It was going to be either a B61-11 EPW (earth penetrating weapon) or a newer RNEP (robust nuclear earth penetrator) weapon. The main design problem with nuclear bunker busters is that the nuclear component can't handle the stress of penetrating more than 10 meters of reinforced concrete. I'm sure they have gotten around that problem during the past 20 years.
What about a giant shaped charge bomb? 2.5tons of explosive behind a giant copper plate
Yeah, like the BROACH warhead fitted to Storm Shadow missiles.
Because kinetic energy is more efficient against concrete, it's not hardened steel.
Firing a standard FMJ steel bullet will make a bigger dent against concrete than the same bullet with some sort of an elaborate shaped charge.
I would think that a whole series of bunker-busters (one after another) would penetrate a target
They aren't that accurate to hit the same exact hole. The weapon depends on the pressure build up when detonated within a closed space and that isn't going to happen if there is a huge crater at the impact site.
@@glandhound why would it not penetrate below the crater?
@@glandhound
Recent Israeli operations showed successive strikes on one target using precision Penetration Ordinance, there are clearly varying degrees of "accuracy" when it comes to these Weapons Systems.
The GBU 57 for example, can penetrate 200' of hardened concrete. Weighing in at 30,000 lbs., this bunker buster has a warhead weighing 5,740 lbs. The warhead will go off at the depth it's set to penetrate previously to detonation. It's affectionately referred to as the MOP, or Massive Ordnance Penetrator. These are the likely weapons used on the Houthis, as well as the gift to Nasrallah. It's well to note that one doesn't necessarily need to fully destroy the bunker it's attacking, rather, it can completely remove the air from the space of said bunker, as in the case of the killing of Nasrallah in Lebanon. It was determined that while in his little space where he physically survived, he actually asphyxiated as the air was removed from the space by the explosions that cut off air flow to the said bunker. This reasoning can be applied to the destruction of Iran's deeply buried nuclear facilities, some of which are said to be located under a mountain. One need only destroy the entrances to the said bunkers, as the result would be the turning of these bunkers into actual tombs for anyone working there, as well as a method of containing radiation released locally from the destruction of their centrifuges, and other equipment that's sole purpose is to enrich the Uranium to bomb making percentages. I still think that Israel will in effect, disregard Biden's directives that Israel should not attack Iran's nuclear plants and plans to develop a bomb. Turning their facilities into tombs will do quite nicely, don't you think? For Israel not to destroy Iran's capability to make a nuclear bomb would go completely against their mission to survive, given that Iran has stated quite openly on many an occasion that its mission is to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth, and every Jew with it.
Iran with its other following countries needs to be sent this video.
Excellent - Thanks ! 👍
Bunker Busters were designed in only 10 days. Sadam Hussain had a concrete bunker 50 feet deep in sand. We took old artillary canons made with specialized alloys from WW2. Tjey were heated, rolled, proportioned and filled with explosives. The bunker buster bomb was designed by nessesity.
Just like Mr. Miagi said in the karate kid, "If do right, no can defense!"
500,000 psi concret no Bunkerbuster can get through that
@@moa4721 That's what they all say, I men "said". Past tense. It doesn't need to go through it, just near it. Nazrallah choked to death on toxic fumes. You're obviously not a civil engineer. There's pipes and vents and shit. 🤦
Nasrallah knew about the bunker buster but forgotten about the thermobaric war head. He choked inside his bunker
Nasrallah know about this topic..
Sorry ... SABIA , SUPO 😜☝️😎🇦🇷🇮🇱
THX FOR USING INTERNATIONAL METRIC SYSTEM
And thanx for being so ignorant as to not include metric to SAE equivalents.
@@coloradomountainman8659 maybe you should move to Metrics? Son or late you would do it
in a country of mountains 100 meters of penetration is not a lot
modern ordinance is accurate enough, you could stack strike after strike on top of each other to work your way down deeper. That being said though, even if you don't completely destroy a target, by completely burying it, you could still turn a bunker into a tomb.
You could aim for the entrances, assuming you have Intel on all of them …
@@alesh2275 then it's a mine rescue
still not as good & there's probably counter measures to that
@@heraclitus6100 that's still harder
@@alesh2275 sar radars,aren't a,silver bullet on,their own
Do any of these bombs use the "shaped charge" effect?
Nasrallah swears by them.
Dude actually believed allah would protect him from pissed off Israelis. 😂
That’s Deep man
Do not overestimate the bunker buster capabilities. There is no metal known to us that can sustain the impact of very hard material. However, it works on concrete if the force applied to the concrete horizontally, not vertically.
do you mean a round ball like bunker wall/roof would be ok-ok?
How deep are Iranian bunkers and do the US / Israel have the requisite bunker busters?
Unlike Lebanon, Iran has robust anti-air systems + hypersonic missiles that Israel can't intercept...
Lebanon is unprotected from the sky, just like Ukraine after losing all air defence US and NATO provided, and the result is seen.
@@Putin-man Iran has the same class of Russian supplied anti-air systems as Syria, the type that Israel’s Adir runs rings around …
@@Putin-man Ah, yes, Iran’s ‘unstoppable’ hypersonic missiles and ‘impenetrable’ bunkers. Clearly, the world's superpowers are quaking in their boots, right? I mean, who needs decades of advanced American military tech and bunker-busters designed to take out facilities far more fortified than anything Iran can dream up? It's almost cute how you’ve bought into the hype. Guess what-hypersonic missiles aren't some magic bullet that bypasses every defense system. And those bunkers? The U.S. has been designing weapons to crack open far tougher nuts for years. But sure, keep thinking Iran has outmatched one of the most technologically advanced militaries on the planet. Sounds like someone’s been reading a bit too much state-sponsored propaganda.
The iranians are using special concrete mixed in with carbon fibre like substrates which is quite a lot stronger unfortunately.
I think one underestimates the 'quality' of the shockwave, so even if, say, the last layer (bottom most) of 2' thich concrete survives, the blast wave would kill all occupants inside, wouldnt it?
Pero eso no representa problema alguno : se arroja una termobarica en la entrada, y problema solucionado ... ☝️😎🇦🇷🇮🇱
So the "Cloudmaker" , is basically 2 X MOABs. 🤔
....alahu' akk--kkkaaaboom
This may apply to a barn in Ottawa.
A casing of tungsten might penetrate deeper than one made of steel, which is cheaper.
THE way the world is BUNKER BUSTERS OF ALL VERSIONS ARE A GIVEN!!
Nasrallah just met his 72 goats.
Already they use one penetrator bomb followed precisely with another that starts it's penetration at the bottom of the whole the first one made. It's shown to be the most effective. I wonder if they could do it with 3 or even 4 stages. The forth bomb starting it's penetration after three penetrations before it I would think that would deny any bunker a chance at all
Lol 😂
That's a good strategy plus trolling the enemies 😂 but, Delivering the Bomb exactly at the same spot could be a challenge.. It sounds good theoretically but we don't know how practical it is 😅
Question, why not throw 50 bombs at exactly the same spot to destroy a huge bunker?
The entrance to the bunker is soft as air.
The enemy is not in any cave or underground bunker. They are at the grocery store hawking you down for that tri tip roast in your shopping cart.
what about the bomb that was used in Vietnam that was delivered out of a C-130
daisy cutters? I thought those were used to clear LZs
Daisy Cutters was America's first MOAB. Surface work clearing landing zones in Vietnam. It was used all the way up to 2008 in Afghanistan until it was replaced by the current MOAB. It's not a bunker buster.
The Daisy Cutter is not a bunker buster but Walmart maker
Is it me or is the some one running out of the bunker at 9:53 secs (( on the left hand side ))
maybe some cardboard target they use for rifle training. if it was a real person he would get burned to ash
9:54 R.i.p to that man
The best is the best😊😊
All this can happen because international law has no real enforcement its just the name of a complex set of agreements between countries that have never been obeyed.
So what's against "international law" with the use of a JDAM?
Depleted Uranium Casing on a hypersonic warhead
No "firey hearts"? 😂
.29 The "horizon" occurred a decade ago.
WTF DISNEY BOMB?? WHAT WOULD WALT SAY??
General purpose lol
So then how are all these terrorists out and about targeting meat eaters? Obviously these weapons have not done their job in putting any fear in the hearts of the enemy.
is it gay to imagine these as giant flying falloses??
Yes
ฮิชบอลเลาะ ไม่ปลื้มสิ่งนี้
Will be useful when the tech bros go hide in their bunkers
It,weird it worked in lebanon not against hamas,leader sinwar though
Thank you . ( 2024 / Oct / 14 )
Hilter wouldn't have encouraged this
Bunker busters do nothing for objects miles underground
such as?
Nasrallah has a testimony to tell😂
The script is too large.
Redo the clip and make the script 12 pt.
That's on you buddy, the author of the video can't decide what size YOUR subtitles are set at.
@@glandhound thanks buddy
Bunkers could be built with Reactive armour, which is a technology widely used in tanks against penetrating missiles.
9:50 Sadly the Iranian regime needs to be taught a lesson.
Made is USA 🇺🇸
Bunker busters bomb cannot penetrator dense naturally granite Mountain even more than 10 m...
easy - just make somewhat strong roof and very weak floor. if bonb goes through it buries itself 100m in a soft sand (I needed to use "bonb" because my comment didn't post otherwise)
Man is not only created in the image of God but with the ability of God!!! Utter destruction is man's main ability and pursuit.😂
Other videos have covered these bombs much better that this vid which just seems to be a copy and paste job
Do you know name of the other videos? I can’t find any good ones and there are many bad ones.
"WWIl US Bombers" Channel, he has incredibly detailed videos on the subject.
Most of these groups they suddenly felt empowered because they thought they found a new form of concrete and or utilization of it for making bunkers. This was on this platform a couple of years ago. I immediately told them this wasn't the case and that it would be defeated. And I'm betting that's where the Iranian King is right now. Is behind something that's going to act like a closed fist except he's in the closed fingers thinking he's safe in that bunker. He's not😅😅😅😅😅
#iscreenshot I retain all rights to my intellectual property. Which includes the right to sue for damages such as algorithm modifications or deletion
🕉 Satyameva Jayate: Truth and Honesty and Reality of possibilities need to be experimented as materials that are available nowadays probably will be lighter - However, Their strengths will be greater - Composite materials that use carbon fibre in casings will probably hold the ‘Tonnage’ weight of the explosive components… Woking on this design will need a penetrating ‘frontend’ of dense-solid that has been reinforced like they do in ‘Stressed-concrete’ blocks… I envisage the outer casings of carbon fibre to be like ‘onion-layers’ that would ‘peel’ off as the projectile penetrating deeper and deeper… The use of Rockets to assist in this drilling-down have to create a ‘helical-twist’ that sort of screws-n-twist at a relatively high-speed (independent of the own-ward slicing that the frontend or ‘the needle-point’ of the ‘tip’)… Look, My mind-experiment is really using the basic design of a ‘Golf-pin’ which when it gets pressed into the ground has a specific shade that helps ‘slide’ in without much effort… Hence, when i say there has to be a ‘spiralling action’ as well - what I mean is one sees this in a ‘Rifle’ that increases the accuracy because the twist gives the spinning ‘bullet’ a well planned path to follow… Hence, my design takes several of the well known effects associated with principle os projectile and their travel through ‘materials’… There is air, there is solid rock-soil-Concrete (reinforced with metal rebars etc)… Hence, as the suggest design has the least resistant head made from very dense ‘heavy metal like spend Uranium’ that has a very sender ‘pin-like’ shape - I add composite ‘panels’ in onion-layers that will ‘peel’ off as the ‘needle’ is penetrating as well the friction will be reduced as the carbon composite panels will be where the ‘spinning’ will get it ‘lubricated-space’… The very dark solid barrel of a Gun-from-the-tank will be forged in layers with circular cylinders that have been ‘telescoped’ into perhaps 4 tubes - The ‘stressed’ cables will really be ‘wrapped’ around each forged barrel… finally , the single tube of metal with its 4 tubes will be stood up or be held vertically… This is when The molten high tensile steel will be poured into the hole… Thus, the long heaven mid section will retain the ‘straightness’ (notice when one hammers a long six inch nail into timber the back-end of the nail often bends at the mid-point and the nail really ends up in the wood as a bent nail - This is what the design I have suggested will avoid when it hits the different ‘material’ underground)… Hell, I think the rockets in the tail end will be spinning this damn penetrating so fast there will be very little time before the hole is covered over by the debris… Therefore, The casing panels that have been peeled off will likely to create a ‘selieve’ through which the metal will simply slide… I have not worked out how the wide ‘Acorn-type’ shape at the rear will behave under The soil… I need to look at the experiments that study the projectile that hit at an impact of 90 degrees verticals as well at 60 degrees etc… before, I am satisfied about the behaviour of the backend of the penetrating needle - My mind is made up… This design will give a very deep reach for the explosive component to do the maximum destruction… What do you think?… As for the Mathematical equations - and that sort of proofs - I have to sit down and work the various factors that are involved… Next comes the considerations of delivering the weapon… I think I will use that Transport Cargo plane - Place this heavy beast on a sledge-slide - open the rear cargo door - give it a push and a small parachute to pull it out - next with assistance from another bigger parachute make it vertically hanging i.e. to make it very vertical over the target - detach the parachute - and see this baby plunge into the targeted bastrads who are hiding in the deep bunker - They will have no chance to escape… BAMB … Satyameva Jayate
Is that the german u boat pen, which was not finished when it was bombed at the 2:34 mark, ✌✌🦘🦘👍👍
putler is waiting for his own.
AI clickbait
Miller Mary Williams Robert Miller Margaret
Palestine ❤
Sorry very bad
Nasrallah unsubscribed
Concrete to dust…
Confidence to doubt…
3rd/4th
The iatola
Now Iran is crying 😅😅😅😅
حسن نصرالله🐷
hasan dumas...u.s. took him out..via idf