Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Choosing the D700 over the D850....Am I Crazy?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июл 2023
- I own both cameras and I talk about choosing to use the D700 for several shoots instead of using the D850. Arguably a much better camera.
You made the right choice and I can help you find closure with this topic…just send me the D850 😉
D810 ❤
Never crazy, the D700 is awesome - it’s all about the image quality. The D700 sensor is magic pixidust
If possible, Try D4 or D4s. I think image processing algorithm in D4(s) is the best among D700, d800, d810, d850, D3(s, x). Of course, ignore all the differences among those models.
I'm going through the same thing now with my D700 and Z6. I did a side by side comparison trying to match all settings and there was almost no difference. 🤯 as a matter of fact, in the dark, the D700 outperformed with the tonal gradations. I'm floored, and still happy i have my D700. Remember, photograpy is an emotional decision, not just technical. I LOVE my D700 and bought it a new lense. Voigtlander 58mm f1.4... match made in heaven!
This comment, was seriously so profound thank you
I'd be interested to see the results with the Voigtlander. Have you got a link please
Enjoyed the video. I don't think you're crazy at all. I like the colors better on the D700. Also, the D700 has an almost film-like look that I love.
I have a D610,i really like it, but i find myself going back to my favorite D200. I love the color i get from it
You're not crazy mate, it's the rest of the world that's gone crazy.
I used SLR's back in the 80's and 90's and I sold the lot due to other interests.
Bought a second hand D3000 in 2015 ( the lens was an old 35-80mm f:4 D, therefore incompatible) and couldn't use it. Menu? ADR?
I put it in a draw and forgot about it 😅
Anyway, moved to Spain (bear with me) with a huge castle on our doorstep and decided to give the D3000 another go.
Eventually I was pushing it beyond it's capabilities.
It's ISO performance was very poor over 400.
I picked up the D300s last October for £70 (5k shutter actuations 👍) whilst working with my mate. He wanted to upgrade his lenses and he gave me his pre VR 18-55 kitty and an old Sigma 70-210mm.
The learning curve of the menu wasn't as steep and I soon got going. I customised the buttons and no more diving into the menus.
The difference between the two cameras was huge.
The 12mp D300s is the crop sensor version of the D700 and it's glorious 😊.
The old 35-80mm works great with the built in motor 👍.
The 18-55mm is a fantastic versatile lens. Not quite macro, but you can get pretty close to your subject.
I would love to get a 35mm 1.4 prime, and build up some 2.8 zooms.
A D850 would be very nice, but do I need one? Not really.
That's a thought, why don't you reduce the size of the images on camera.
You could use the D850 for low light conditions and the D700 for everything else.
Decision's decisions eh? 😅
As I said, it's not you that's crazy, it's the rest of the world that's losing the plot. 👍
The world is completely insane..lol. I could reduce the size but I'm always feeling like I want to collect as much data as possible when I pull the trigger...lol... I should do that and compare it to the D7200...maybe a future video of that would be cool.
I have printed images from the d700 that are 5foot x 3foot and look great! Close up of horses face with loads of detail and beautiful colours. Don't get sucked into believing you need the latest cameras people lol!
I'm in the same boat as you, there's something truly magical about the D700 and being my go to.
Man, those D850 colours do suck in comparison to the D700 ones! Amazing stuff!
I love My 700, my choice of walkabout camera, fantastic picture quality and it doesn't murder the memory space in the computer. I have an 800e and a Z7, love the 7 but I am going to back to the 700 for general use again.
I have a D850 and do use it but I prefer the D700 or D3s. Go Figure. I don't plan on getting a Nikon Z camera. Too much invested in F lenses and I like the results I get. If I get a mirrorless, it may be a small Fuji or Sony A camera.
I don't have an 850 ,but i have a d700 the images I get from this is more than enough for anyone's appetite.
Specific cameras hit a magic point. They usually combines a good sensor, good ergonomics, and good enough focusing and response. I used a Nikon D300 for years because it had that magical combination. I liked the image quality; it felt right in my hands. The controls were laid out so that I could find what I needed quickly and easily. Although I don't use the D300 now, I couldn't sell it. My favorite pro camera is a Canon 5DIV for the same reasons. When I hike about, I like an older Fuji X100S and a Canon M6II. The Fuji has more charm, but the Canon is more capable. And so it goes. Cameras have been great for the last 15+ years.... so many excellent choices out there, but nothing beats a pro-level DSLR as they were built to last and built to work.
100%
I bought a D610 back in December and it was an improvement over my D7000 . Then I got a D700 and fell in love with the image quality and color rendition. I use a 105mm F2.8 Micro lens most of the time but sometimes use the 105mm F2.5. Both are incredibly sharp. I'll keep the other cameras for video. Loving the D700!
The d610 is pretty good too, and can be found for under $500 with low shutters. But the D700 is not overrated at all either, and it is as good as advertised - I have a couple of them. It's probably all I need for a long time.
Same got the 700 to start doing concerts got the 610 a bit after and I love the 700 taking it as my back up on a shoot at the end of the month but I have a feeling I'm gonna get better shots with the 700 since I'm going to be shooting someone with dark skin at golden/blue hour and the 610 autofocus is not on par w the 700
I used nothing else for 13 years, loved that camera, but my Z6 is in a different league in less-ideal conditions. In most conditions you can't tell the difference. I once had a huge print made and it looked fantastic!
Exactly! Well stated. I love both cameras, but I still prefer shooting the D700 in the circumstances you describe: top of which is the file size!!
The video was thought provoking good job well done
My partner has a Z8. Found me a used D700 at a local shop. Being fortunate enough to be able to compare both camera's raw files, I couldn't believe that I actually prefer the D700's photos. Don't get me wrong, the Z8 is a beast, but the D700 colors, file size, and the ability to drive AF-D lenses won me over. To each his own!
My D700 is for my "fill the frame" shots that will have limited cropping. Big group pix and the like, I use the 35mp D810. I am looking at migrating into the Z cameras, as there is a quality video capability the F mounts just don't have. “The things you really need are few and easy to come by; but the things you can imagine you need are infinite, and you will never be satisfied.” EPICURUS
I got 2 nikon af-p lenses. The 18-55 and the 70-300. I am shocked at how good they are. Fast, silent, incredibly sharp, great colors, amazing macro with the 18-55. These are the dx versions. Yes, i have a D700. I shot a 3 day church event with it. The color gradation is breathtaking.
Right now I'm shooting with a D750 and a D500. Really don't see a need to "upgrade" as the picture quality is great with both bodies. The only thing I would like is for a bigger buffer on the D750. It slows down quickly when shooting action.
10 years ago I did a three shot pano with a D3s (12 mega pixel camera) and did a print 12 inches by 48 inches. Looks great! The latest and greatest is not needed for beautiful prints! I've got my eyes open for a D700!
Cool, I actually went to enjoy more the CCD sensors , lately- D70S ;D80; D200
My go-to camera is my D700! I love it!
the D810 is also a beast of a camera.
I still have the D700 but I prefer more D750 for the faster focus especially in low light and for the 2 card slots. Thanks for the review!
hey i have a problem with nikon d700 the exposure meter seem not work, i mean im balance it to center but the result sometimes darker and sometimes too bright, any ideas?
how shall I put it?, ermm ..an incredible combination of cameras and lens are photos the ones when you look back 30 or 40 yrs from now,, reminds you vividly the moment when you took the shots.
I have the D700 and love it. Try the Canon 5D classic Mark 1 you will love it . I also just got a Nikon D2x and let me tell you they are the best image out of camera I have ever seen????? Wow, wow wow. Cost me $190. Amazing camera. I own D4 , D300, D200 Canon 1Dx mark ii and I have to say my favorite is D2x. AM I CRAZY????
Thanks for the tip on the Canon. Been wondering which Canon may be great to try. Crazy?...no..just a little G.A.S...lol.
Try used photo pro they pop up from time to time. 👍
As an outdoor and landscape person, I really prefer the D800E and D850. On the other hand, the D700 seems to just get better results with portrait work (which I have no interest in) in way that's hard to explain. I have a couple of friends who are professional photographers who swear up and down on the D610 and D700.
Great video
Thank you.
I very much respect the point you made about selling prints. I think that point is completely lost with most photography channels. Personally, I've sold more prints that I took with my Nikon D40 and later D90 than any other supposedly "better" camera. I will say one thing about those two cameras, and I'm not sure that it applies to the D700 or not. Grass is a little too green in that generation of Nikon cameras.
I had a D850. It and I could never get along. There were always problems with the photos. It didn't matter how I set up the camera. It was a big disappointment. I sold it. So I am back to using my D700 and totally satisfied with it. Have others with the D850 also had issues with it?
I've been using the D700 for 12 years now and it's a beast. The only thing that I find pretty annoying is the viewfinder that isn't 100%, so there's a difference between what fits the frame in the viewfinder and the final image.
The reason for this is the CFA. All cameras today have a weak CFA. Why? To turn up the ISO range. Disadvantage: in red there are also other colors like disturbing blue. I have 2 D700 & 1 D810. What do I use 90% of the time? Guess... Greetings
I've kept my old gear. FF cameras for me are the D800 and Z5. However, I prefer the file sizes from my D7200 and D300. The old D300 with a Sigma 17-50mm 2.8 is what I shoot with the most. Like you mentioned describing the D700, the D300 has better rendering of skin tones. Since street photography is the bulk of my shooting (enthusiast, not a pro), the images I get from it are "better" than my other cameras. I use the other cameras for different things, but I could probably live without the rest of them. Of course, the D800 is my landscape camera. I wouldn't get rid of it.
D3 and D700 have a much different non-Sony sensor along with software that crunches images. Martin Castein praises D700 highly along with Canon 5D m1 and m2 models for their own separate reasons. In my limited experience I can see why. Great video.
It’s the best decision
d700 pics are extremely special -
the only other camera to compare is Df but that’s an acquired taste
I go back and forth with this. I always end up back with the d700. I’m currently shooting with a z7ii and have 5 of the top lenses for the system including the 14-24 and 24-70 2.8s. I made up my mind that I’m selling all of it and going back to d700. I just love the output from that camera. Newer cameras to me are just way too sharp and clinical.
Love that..lol. I totally agree. New cameras make everything way sharper than what we see in real life...atleast in my opinion.
Been using the 700 for years. It's always the one I grab for a shoot. However, I would NOT do any professional work without a backup. And the D850 would be it. The ONLY flaw with the 700, (and not a flaw really) is that lack of an additional memory card as backup. I'd buy more used 700's if it had additional slots. I'm on my 3rd now.
I agree, wish it had 2 card slots. I may be in the market for another. One of mine seems to have a sticky shutter.
Really liked this video. You express the turmoil we all have! I'm a pro photographer here in England. I gave up thinking about gear a long time ago. However... my best images (i.e., the ones the clients like the most) come from the D700, The canon 5D (original) and the D500 (simply an awesome camera), but leader by a smidge is the D700. Not the ones shot on my 1DXmk2, D800/850, Sony's or Fuji (we have lots of cameras in our range..). And, the most popular wedding image I've ever shot? The one that seals the deal? From a Canon Digital IXUS500. Go figure!
Love that. Thanks for sharing. It's the result that matters, not how you got there.
You are not crazy! I’m still shooting a Nikon D 70. I have found nothing that gives me the same results. I believe it’s the CCD sensor. Hey, some of my favorite pictures I shot with an iPhone 3GS. Stick with the one you love!
If it is thought a camera is needed because it is the latest, it was purchased under misconception. You clearly did not need a D850 as proven with preference for the D700. We still use Nikon D3 and D4s, they are fabulous, along with D800's and D850 but they are used for different situations. Each photographer has their own personal preference and it ends there. Who gives a stuff what other photographers are using, we also use D3200, D5300 they too are excellent but no less better than other cameras. A D3200 could cover the work displayed with appropriate lens. All this baloney on RUclips, one has to chuckle! All the best.
What do you choose the d3 vs d4 for? Any particular use case or what you have available?
Ergonomics and ease of use, speed and image quality, more or less point and shoot, they were going for a song on ebay in mint condition, always wanted them but used medium and large format for work, so never needed them until Hasselblad lost favour with Fujiblad tat!. Would not touch another Hasselblad product!@@thegreatsiberianitch
I’ve been shooting a D700 since 2010, but I had some thoughts on mirrorless when those started appearing. I decided against due to their diminutive size by comparison. That and I didn’t like the idea of having to purchase another set of lenses. Yes I know there’s an adapter, but it’s kind of band-aiding your photography until you break down and spend the money on the proper lenses…
I’d always wanted a D850, finally just took the leap and did it so now I can shoot either body with the same lenses. Do I carry both when out shooting, no way it’s just too much stuff to carry…
Will I ever consider mirrorless again. Perhaps the Z8 as it’s big enough to feel right to me. But that’s a long ways off in the future, if at all as I’m late 60’s now.
Older cameras take just as good photos as the new ones. Have the D700 too.
Thx for the vlog and samples. Are they JPG or you do post of raw files though? (owner of 2 D700 here)
Those are JPG and they are actually the low-res proofs I sent to the client.
just a side note: ISO for the d700 is 100 if you put in LO.
I copy everything you feel about the d700. never used the 850 but would love to. but still, file sizes and costs are still too high for most applications. been shooting all kinds of events on a 100k shutter d700 with the 85mm 1.8, 28-85 3.5-4.5 and the fabulous 70-210 f4. never ever, even high ticket clients, complained about the delivered images having not enough MP or anything.
it's quite the opposite: like you said, especially the skin colours and other renditions, as we can see in your portraits, have this value that people appreciate .
sometimes I even think that I get booked more than all those Sony shooters because of the "d700 look". 🤣
People love the images from the D700. You have to assume that if they look at your portfolio..it's the "Look" that wins them over.
Pixel peepers and those that truly understand the science, always have to have the latest and greatest gear. However, as you mentioned, file sizes for 45+ mp cameras are huge! My philosophy has always been “Is the customer happy?” And my customers have been happy even when using a Canon 30D at 8mp and enlarging to 40”x30” I am now using a Nikon D500 with 21mp. The file sizes are manageable, but I have the advantage of 10fps for 200 images without the camera farting and spluttering to a standstill! I don’t need that function, but it offers a huge safety net. Customers don’t care about 45mp, or whether the camera is full-frame or aps-c. They care about the final image.
100% agree. I'd like to add a D500 to my arsenal.
We are getting reminders that sensors are peaking and differences will be minimal unless you go full niche pro cinematic
One issue with d850 is a tad much yellow in skin tones as evident on the last comparison pair of images. I hope there is a Lightroom fix...
Although I mostly use canon mirrorless nowdays...My current favorite nikon dslr is the D750. Cheers
You should do a video on the best lenses for the Nikon D700
I'm using my D700 and my Canon 5D Classic all the time now. Those two hit the spot.
You're not crazy, great cameras are great cameras. I have a collection of about 10 to 15 cameras, and they're rotating constantly as a stop using different ones. The d700 is very special. So is the Nikon DF . But also if you ever looked into Canon the 6d would blow your mind
You are not crazy. I had the D700 for 10 years and got a D850. I decided to give my D700 to family and kind of regret it. It's an amazing camera. The D850 takes a little getting used to, but it too is fantastic. However, for portraits I think the D700 is actually better as the lower megapixel count is more forgiving and starting at ISO 200 allows you faster shutter speeds. For landscape / cityscape I prefer the D850 though. I've got now a Z7-II and lately a Z8 as well. The Z7-II pretty much replaced the D850 in everything but fast action or bird photography, simply because of the better Z lenses. But that is another story. If you're invested in Nikon F mount glass, then both the D700 and the D850 are great choices. Some old manual focus lenses work great on the D700 and produce a very individual and unique look, like for example the 50/f1.4 AIS or the 105/f2.5 AIS. Those lenses are less good on the D850 simply because they can't match the high resolution of the camera.
Thanks for the input. I am really starting to love the D850 but for events and portraits I'm sticking with the D700. I'll go to mirrorless eventually...probably the Z8 or Z9 but the means have to justify the ends. I'm interested in the better glass and in-body stabilization.
@@dankabanuckphotography5989I found the Zf’s capabilities to be pretty good steal for its price!
I have a d700 and a rx100 m3 and for future proofing I think one way to go hehe
I thought I was the only one who still uses the D700 for family portraits, portraiture, etc. I am intrigued by the z8 a little for landscape action though. THX
I have many Nikon cameras through the years including a D700 and D3. The only issue since they use the same sensors is that the D3 has a 100% viewfinder while the D7oo has something like a 95% viewfinder. No problem as long as you check what you shot.
This is hilarious, I end up grabbing my D300 more than my D750, similarly. Smaller files sizes, plus extra zoom from crop sensor. I still want a D700 but I wonder if it would be redundant because I have a D750.
Crazy right? The D700 has the Panasonic sensor which renders a different color pallet. Really, that's what it's known for. It won't necessarily give you better images then what you have but it will give that D700 look.
@@dankabanuckphotography5989 thank you for the info I had no idea it had a Panasonic sensor. I might have to try one out someday.
Still using my 1dx mark 1 : )
Any favorite lenses ? Up in the air between fx or DX
I use the 24-70 2.8 more than anything , then the 70-200 after that. Both are FX. Even when I was shooting my D3200 and D7200 I was buying FX lenses with that assumption I would go full frame at some point. I do have the Sigma 17-50 2.8 which is a DX lens. Good lens for the money actually. I think a DX body is ideal for sports and wild life because you get the extra reach with FX lenses and the majority if the sensor is using the sharpest part of the lens.
Not at all. I choose my d700 over my 850 all the time. Only time I use the 850 is when I know the print is going to have to be very large.
I have both. I tend to reach for the D850 specifically when I am trying to get every detail down to the molecular level, ha. I'll use it more for architecture or macro and then use the D700 for natural landscape. Thats just me. You're not THAT crazy, ha
Also, I came across an opinion that D810 is actually better than 850 in terms of colors ...
The D780 is actually the best dslr Nikon has really made….its got cleaner image and better dynamic range then the d850…..plus you can go into mirrorless mode for all its benefits. It’s actually the most complex dslr Nikon has ever made. But it’s getting no attention coz of mirrorless. Just wanted to add its file size is perfect and I do have the d700 as well….i got it new when it was still in production. For some things it’s great still. But do check out the d780 it really does hit the sweet spot.
Thank for you comment. I honestly have never given the D780 any thought. I will put it on my radar.
I still use both!
I don't think you're crazy. I think technology is sort of coming to wall as to what is actually useful to most people, even professionals. Also, companies focus more on cost of production and profits rather than creating the "best" quality product. Business majors dominating the art sector. Two often opposing hemspheres of thought. To me, it makes sense that that the older stuff is better in terms of practical purposes. In contrast, coming from a canon 5d mkii, I recently got an om-d e-m5 mki with a lens for less than 300 bucks to "test the waters" of mft and I'm intersted in its image stabalization for low light. Its a fun little camera and it makes me interested in the later ii and iii versions and other om-d's in general. Just some thoughts. We are lucky to have so much excellent technology at bargain prices now. So cool. I wouldn't have been able to afford this stuff otherwise.
How much do photographers make at the low end, not including begginers?
Being a Canon user, I can bet Nikon D700 images will look nicer. How do I know? Because, I own a Canon 5D Classic.
I have both because bought the d700 in 2008 and used it professionally til 2018. I still shoot it for personal work because it is plenty of mp for on line and if it gets trashed at the beach, I really don't care, as after 16 years, it has paid for itself many times over and it still works perfectly. Nikon products hold up, period. But I want the 46 mp for larger prints and more detail plus the dynamic range never ceases to amaze me after knowing what the d700 limitations after 16 years with it.
Thanks for the video. Hey I just bought a D3S on eBay, Waiting for delivery. What do you think about this camera against either one of the 850 or 700?
The D3S is the same sensor as the D700..it's the pro version. Colors are a little different but it's a great camera.
@@dankabanuckphotography5989
Thanks. 🙏
The D3s does not share the same sensor as the D700. The D3 has the same sensor but the D700 version has been tweaked compared to the the D3
@@PhillipConroy thanks for the reply
I love the D700. I was sad when I gave away and sold my film cameras but im holding onto the D700 even if I add a Z 8 (Im debating on how) I never bought the D850 but I do love a lot of things abt it
I have the D700 with a Zeiss Planar 50/1.4. I also have a D800, but the D700 produces magical images. It has a character. Hard to explain but people who shoot with the D700 will know what I mean.
Dan, first, thanks for the video. I find myself wishing for an orderly discussion similar to Steve Perry, Simon D'Entremont or Gerald Undone for this kind of thing. What do I mean by this? A quick outline (you did get to it) of why you prefer the D700 over the D850, and then what other reasons you would prefer one over the other. You did cover that you shoot people - and 12 megapixels is enough for you - and the file saving space (the d700 in LLC 14 bit is about 25mb file size, D850 in LLC 14bit is double that at about 50mb file size). You also alluded that you like the unique "monochromatic" electronic noise of the d700 over the multicolor noise of most other Nikon cameras including the d850. Fair enough. The D700 was (and still is) a tremendous camera, so no argument from me. It is the heaviest current camera I own (D700, D850, Z9). I shoot predominately sports, action (dance), and wildlife. You know well that those shooting product photography, museum reproduction, high resolution landscape in good light have different needs from their photography and systems. I still take my D700 out often to remind myself what the images look like and what it felt like before I picked up a camera. I will tell you one place "mirrorless" and the Nikon Z9 has made a huge difference even doing portraits (and yes, Canon and Sony cameras can do this as well). - Using lenses with shallow DOF (i.e. 105mm f/1.4 or 200mm f/2) and nailing sharp eyes without user or subject fatigue. It goes without saying, that because of WYSIWYG EVF and subject detection, getting out of focus portraits or a poorly exposed photo, is mostly a thing of the past. No "black out" of course means you also always see the photo you are taking (not true of DSLRs). You mention "The client doesn't care", and that is, in general, very true. That said, Dan, I have taken many non-studio, outdoor still images of portraits and action with the lenses I just mentioned, and I'm left picking up the subjects jaw off the floor. Doesn't matter whether it is an action hockey portrait or photographer friend. The most recent example was a woman who said she "hates" her appearance in portraits - then saw the LCD screen of the Z9 with the 105 f/1.4 and 200mm f/2 and immediately loved them. The sheer speed at which you can work, recompose, and nail focus even with shallow DOF is perhaps the single most impressive thing about Nikon's new mirrorless cameras. The edge-to-edge AF point coverage and shear speed and accuracy of the AF point is a "game changer". Shooting at events with silent "shutter" since there is no shutter is great (church, golf, concert) and your subject doesn't try and pose - but is more natural - because they do not hear the camera clicking (especially the wildlife). Yes, I could get similar shots with the D700, but it would take much more time to move the focus point where I want it and just get a shot I wanted. Just sayin. CF Express cards are durable and fast. Compact Flash cards are still cheap, but the pins are not so forgiving. The one card slot can, for some, may be an issue. The loud and heavy shutter slap can also wake you up. And if you shoot video - well, that's for another day. Point is for what you shoot, I would encourage you to try out a Nikon Z8/Z9 with f-mount lenses and the FTZii - as the focus is far faster and more accurate than on the D850. You could lower your file size by shooting HE* and see if an eventual move to mirrorless would be worth it for you. If you remember the joy of with digital photography of being able to see your images immediately, then for me, this was a similar joy to watching the camera find the eye before I can even hit AF-On. Watching the focus box move with the object and the object stay in focus as you recompose a moving target (athletes, BIF) is exhilarating. I will give you this one caveat though, the Z9 is a complicated menu AF mode beast, that can be tamed if you take your time. Results just "out-of-the-box" may be frustrating (as a friend of mine found out after I talked him into buying one). That said, a year later, he never picks up his D850 anymore. Neither does the Pro that started me (and who I talked into the Z9 - told me to get lost because I was bad for his wallet). The D700 compared to the D850 - grapefruit vs orange. Both great and sweet. Pick the one that brings the joy of photography to you. One thing I didn't hear you mention - is that 12 megapixels is very forgiving at handheld slow shutter speeds. ;-) By the way, thank you for posting some images that you took in the video.
Good points, the eye autofocus is the number one feature that motivates me to move from D700 to a Z8, but that's not going to happen soon as it means I need to buy te body + the lenses, probably not less than $6k to $10k expense depending on the glass I'd buy, which is a bit too much for me right now.
@@v.bourdeix Just the body and adapter to start. I do not own a Z lens yet, and I've owned the Z9 for 2 1/2 years. The Z8's is just a different animal compared to the D700. Looking forward to hearing about your experience.
I own the D700 (which as you know is 12mp) and also the D750 and D780 (both at 24mp). While I do love the colors of the D700, the extra details captured by the 24mp cameras work well for my use in portraits (and anything for commercial use), which gives more fine detail in hair and clothing in portraits for large printing (especially good for group photos). You can't go wrong with any of these cameras. I used the D700 as a wedding camera for years. However, it is worth considering the D750 or D780. A used D750 is a bargain if you can find one with a low shutter count. But I agree the D700 is a classic camera, great colours, and works well for today's use.
Hows the D780 for weddings.? I don't like Mirrorless camera look & afraid if D780 have same IQ as Z6 with AA Filter..? had D700 & Z6 previously and loved D700 IQ and surprisingly more sharper than Z6.
I’m surprised to hear that your 4-year old computer chokes on the files. My computer (knock on wood) is 16+ years old. I’m processing files from D800e with no problem. Granted, I’m talking about 36MP and not 45MP, but that’s not that big of a jump. Obviously my 12MP files from D700/D3/D3s are faster, but 36MP files are fast enough.
I suspect the main difference is that I use Nikon’s software, and it does not need to re-render every raw file. I guess if you use Lightroom then yeah, this non-stop rendering would drive me crazy also.
Perhaps, give Nikon’s software a try?
I agree and I have 16 gigs of RAM. I have cleared a lot of of my hard drive but still have issues. I have never used the Nikon software but it may be worth a try. Thanks.
Loved my lost D700.
I think by now if you follow people interested in image quality and color science then you know the Nikon D700 is the best of the full Nikon line up, including the Z series. That does not mean it competes with bigger resolution sensors for cropability or detail in shadows or autofocus speed or framerate! But if you care about your camera's image quality and the beauty of color rendition then the D700 is it. I have owned many cameras and the only camera I feel comes close in those areas is the Fuji x100s. I now own a D500, a Z7II but just acquired my third D700 because it is so great for producing beautiful photos with a wide variety of lenses. So no, you aren't crazy, you just spotted what so many of us have also realized, there is no reason to purchase or use any camera other than the Nikon D700.
its like i always say, dont over megapixel people photos
the D700 pics were overexposed, which is IMHO why those pics look better, the darker 850 pic was more realistic, but not as appealing. I didnt see any magical D700 stuff from these pics, not by a long shot. thanks for the vid though, i liked it.
Interesting isnt it. Ive got the D700 and D800 and was thinking of going mirrorless but you've convinced me otherwise. Why waste my hard earned cash?
You process the pics with which software?
Lightroom
@@dankabanuckphotography5989 Thank you. So, if using NEF/Raw, you use Adobe or camera matching profiles to get those D700 colours?
I just use the default in lightroom@@Poraqui
We'll buy the 850 from you!
Ha...thanks but I'm actually liking the D850..lol
Since NIKON switched to SONY CMOS, its cameras became so boring even if all specs look great. I have same feeling comparing with my Pentax K-1 and D700. K-1 with the same cmos with D810, very good dynamic range. just not as existing as shot by D700.
You're not crazy. I dumped a D7200 & kept my D300s. The sum of all parts applied. I hated the cheap build of the D7200. The IQ is also not what ppl make it out to be. I do however wish that Nikon made a D400 with the sensor of the D7000 & body + AF of D300s. I loved my D7000 IQ, but hated that build quality & AF system. That AF system was even worse than the D90 I had. When manufacturers come out with new cameras, they intentionally cripple it, to not encroach on the sales of the higher end cameras.
I chose a Sony SLT-A57 over an Alpha A7MK4. Mostly because I'm poor and can't afford an A7! lol
Try matching up your WB settings if you're going to revisit the comparisons. I think the reason the lower color luminance in the D850 is the increase in DR and tonal depth. Having said that I too have owned my D850 since last august and I love it and it's colors from my perspective, vibrant and true to life colors I might add. I am also looking for a cheaper everyday lower MP body to use as well and the D700 is on my short list of possibilities.
Whatever happens, D700 is the keeper! 🔥🔥
I don't think so. I prefer the 12MP its so much quicker to work with when moving data from one device to another. The colors are beautiful on the D700 and its made in Japan. Very well made. But yes this is a unique camera with a NIKON produced SENSOR and a PENTAX IMAGE PROCESSOR, it is something very special in the Nikon lineup. Paired with a Pro Lens it produces stunning images with an almost 3D quality to them with wonderful pastel colors. P.S. U smoke too much weed.
Ha..I think I need to smoke more weed..lol. I find myself processing images from my D850 to look like images from the D700. Just love the look.
D500 for wildlife, D700 for portraits and D850 for landscape and astrology.
you should under expose a little with d850 to get better images
You cannot compare the Nikon d700 with any device, the colors are clearly superior, the d700 is a masterpiece of photography, there is no such device ever made. The colors are absolutely fantastic on the Nikon d700, there is no comparison with other cameras, I've tried them all, sony, panasonic, canon, Nikon d750, d810, d 850, z 6, absolutely all, the Nikon d700 has direct and real colors , there is no longer such a camera, I'm only talking about JpGs. They are all toys compared to the Nikon D700, the difference is huge!
I can see what you mean
The answer is simple: D700 has fewer Monster-Pixels. So you definitely get more Bang Per Pixel.
D700 is plenty enough for a competent photographer. Most of the things that photographers gripe about these days are small issues about the specs and relatively minor imperfections. You have to work hard to find a camera these days that will not create excellent memories for a client or friend. More than ever before, it is the shooter and not the gear. No, you are not crazy for picking the D700 over the D850. Any camera that saves you time by creating perfect shots straight out of camera, minimizing time spent fiddling with the computer is a winner. Some photographers just want to be photographing.
Since you wasted everybody's time for 19 minutes redundantly asking us if you are crazy over and over again until our eyes roll back into our heads, I must say, yes you are crazy!
Well..thanks for watching..you're probably right..lol
its the lines not the ones that go up your nose
I came here to read how D800 is better, but looks like ill keep my D700 😅
The D850 isn’t the camera for the work you. The D850 is best on a tripod. Camera shake is multiplied with a higher MP camera. The same shake you will see in the D850 will not be visible with the D700. However, you can dumb down the MPs in the D850.
I'm curious if shooting the D850 at 11mp Raw file setting will give files comparable to the D700?
12 mp is all you need
Well you cannot compare between the two cameras.
The reality you do not need a D850 or you cannot afford to run a D850 (storage - computer power - memory cards..... )
For me I will take a D850 over any DSLR any time.
Good luck
Thank you for your comment.
for resolution, we give up so much.