Samm Sheperd how about F-1 innovations period. This whole video was about mostly sports car and endurance racing innovations. Not one mention of monoque chassis or using the engine as a stressed member of the car. Rear engine. This guy is a phoney.
Thank you to SimScale for helping me with some animations. Check out their cloud-based simulation platform here: goo.gl/zIf7MX. I have teamed up with DFTBA to produce some awesome shirts featuring the RE Gear Tooth Logo: Get your Real Engineering shirts at: store.dftba.com/collections/real-engineering If you have any question let me know at: twitter.com/Fiosracht
But but but missed some of the flavor of the engineering choices with regards to ground effects (the flats Ferrari and the BT46 being too wide to accommodate ground effects so had to resort to fans or not being implemented as well). Covering the rise of AWD in rally would be awesome. Maybe the Deltawing as well.
10:15. I couldn’t agree more. That is why I love Endurance Racing, with IMSA and WEC, the racing is more focused on the companies instead of the drivers. The HUGE problem with modern racing is that there are FAR too many restrictions, and worse yet. The BOP, which slows cars down for being too good. Racing should be the opposite of that. Teams should be congratulated for creating better cars, not beat down. Hopefully with the new Hypercar class in WEC, it will usher in a new era of racing, with the speed of modern cars, but with the Level of innovation of racing from 20 years ago
Chris Herrin Kinetic Energy Recovery System is a mechanism that tries to capture and story energy when the car is braking so it can be used later. in most cases this is letting the electrical engine of a hybrid charge the battery when braking.
The disc brake as we know it was developed by Jaguar and Dunlop. The technology swiftly transferred to F1. Jaguar deserves a bit of credit, even tho' they were not an F1 entrant
I would just like to say, I enjoyed the hell out of this. Thank you for your hard work, and extremely high production quality. You have an amazing production team
Same - I also think the lumping of monocoques crash surfaces and brake discs was rather random (in a pixie dust) sort of way. I'm not optimistic about carbon brake discs because passenger vehicles don't need the comparative advantage, and automotive engineers focus on maximizing value for cost. No one buys cars for sub-100ft 60mph to 0 braking performance.
Studied Biomedical Engineering in my undergrad, which is essential Mechanical Engineering with a bit of biology and surgical practice thrown in. My Master's was in Aeronautical, where I specialised in composite materials. Worked in the Oil & Gas industry for three years as a composite design engineer/ product manager then. Varied....
So you love F1, huh. What's your favourite team and/or driver(s)? Because I am not willing to bash you if you disagree with me, I'll state mine: Lewis Hamilton is my favourite driver, specially now with his 4th WDC. Esteban Ocon is my 2nd favourite driver because... well I'm gay and he looks gorgeous, and his team mate Checo Pérez is the same nationality as myself. And I declare myself belonging to 2 F1 fandoms: Mercedes Petronas and Force India
I am currently studying Automotive Engineering and I really love your channel, I cannot imagine the time and effort you put in each one of your videos but I want to say that you are really good at making them. Thank you very much for all the great content you share with us.
I seriously love your videos! it makes me so happy that I am pursuing a career in mechanical engineering. Also I completely agree with you; I love racing, but my love is more towards the amount engineering people have put into these cars.
Thanks for the info! As a 50yo engineer and race enthusiast, I am embarrassed to reveal that I've NEVER heard of Michael May's Porsche 550. This is a remarkable event. Think of what development could have been made sooner if the powers that be weren't afraid of something they couldn't understand. Same goes for the Brabham.
Brother you have one if not the best channel in all of RUclips. I love how informative it is and kind of addicted to your videos! Thank you for all this information and so perfectly explained!
Isn't one of the reason why Carbon Ceramic rotors aren't popular for road car is due to how Carbon Ceramic rotor not being as effective as Steel rotor at low working temperature?
Ovais Saand I thought squeaking noise is due to brake pads? I didn't know they have lower lifespan, but then they're usually on expensive cars that don't cover much mileage, so it wasn't too well known.
Squeaking noise in steel brakes is due to incorrect installation which cause the brakes to vibrate and produce noise.. But Carbon cermic brakes make noise due to Carbons crystalline structure
It's a combination of the poor low temperature performance, cost, and long manufacturing times. It takes 6 months to make the Carbon-carbon rotors used in F1. Even the less expensive carbon ceramic rotors available from supercar companies cost well over $10,000
The Chaparral 2E was Jim Hall’s first car with a high mounted rear wing. It raced in the inaugural CanAm series in 1966. The Chaparral 2F was another of his designs equipped with a rear wing and raced in the Worlds Sports Car Championship. It did race at Le Mans in 1967 but failed to finish. Later in the year it won the BOAC 500 held at Brands Hatch driven by Mike Spence and Phil Hill.
@1:43 One of the greatest lines from a McLaren engineer at the time, when asked if the carbon fiber chassis was stronger and safer than the aluminum they had been using (and what everyone else was still using), his response? "I have no idea... but it's loads faster!!"
Jim Hall's Chaparrel 2J Can-Am car of 1970 was the first car to use ground effects. Using the same "fan car" technology the Brabham BT46b used. I personally love how the Brabham gets the credit for the "fan car" idea when it is not true. Jim Hall invented ground effects not Colin Chapman with Lotus.
Usually the person or entity that gets credit for "first" typically isn't the absolute first, just one of the biggest early *popularizers* of the idea or technology, the one who helped it catch on... Funny how they get all the credit, lol. It's like people thinking Van Halen invented 2-handed tapping on guitar when you can see and hear earlier recorded examples. It's just that he tweaked the technique to his own style and popularized it beyond what anyone else had done previously, so he gets automatically associated with "inventing" it when he really didn't. It's interesting how society/history works like that, lol.
AMEN! Jim Hall is responsible for many aerodynamic innovations used in auto racing and he gets so little credit. It is nice to see that there are others who recognize his importance in the technology of aerodynamics. His contributions are simply amazing. BTW If you ever get the chance visit the Chaparral wing of the Petroleum Museum in Midland. It is wonderful to see the winged wonders that changed auto racing forever. The Chaparral collection (or parts of it) do travel from time to time so call ahead and check to see if your favorite car will be there. The 2K was away when I went.
@@DeathBringer769 "van halen wasnt the first to do the thing but he also completely changed the techniqure but that totally has no grounds to say its different...because I have to have a point that works and i DONT CARE IF ITS SHIT"-You lol
I was always partial to Tyrrell's "Wingbones" suspension shrouds from the 96 car. FIA said"We cant have small low budget teams coming up with sick stuff like this,no sir. BANNED! in reality it was considered a moveable aerodynamics in a pre DRS era.
THAT is an Irish accent? The way he said Jaguhar or Porsh or whatever the Nurnburgring is, made me think along the lines of some American accent or maybe New Zealand? I've heard Irish accents before but they were not like this. I'm genuinely interested btw
@9:58 Chapman ordered Andretti to complain about rocks thrown out the fan (Murray says that if that happened, they would be thrown sideways, not out the rear), because the fan car was too quick for his cars to compete with.
@@yashkrishnatery9082 I'm on course to become one actually! I got accepted into my dream school in France and am now in my second year of studying there. Thank you for the wishes!
Just like to point out, we will likely never see carbon ceramic breaks in normal street cars. Steel rotors are better at low temperatures and street cars don't see the kind of repeated high stress breaking scenarios that race cars do.
Actually carbon breaks on street cars have a big disadvantage. The produced dust can clog the pores in the disc and damage them. Carbon discs have to become hot enough to burn this dust which rarely happens in public driving.
No mention of the Gurney Flap, the safety innovations pioneered by Jackie Stewart, fuel safety, having the engine as the chassis, the F-duct, the raised nose, KERS, the fancy telemetry but we do get a few bits of info about Porsche who don't do F1.
Frist off, I am in extreme admiration of this channel, as one of my dreams in life is to become an engineer so I'm find your commentery very crisp and to the point but this Venturi effect your speaking of, I knew it as Bernoulli's principle
I came back to this video just for the one line "the only difference was the lunatics driving the cars". Still watched the whole video, but that line is so brilliant.
I don't get why the regulations are so strict... Of course you need to establish some rules for safety's sake, but if the goal is to design the fastest car, why not just let the engineers build whatever is within reason? Why put up so many restrictions?
Yeah as was said above, look at how many complaints mercedes got fort he last 2 seasons (and red bull for the 4 years before that) that it was boring because one car was clearly better than all the others. If you have unlimited rules the team with the most money usually wins...
People like you don't get enough credit for the ability to present and explain such a highly detailed and complicated subject that is hard to understand for most people, especially people in the f1 world who'd rather learn about this stuff than read gossip about journalists taking drivers' words the wrong way and write a whole misleading article about it. *cough cough express.co.uk cough cough
The greatest innovation is the way F1 is utilized as a product in order to simultaneously push and finance the tech innovations. Brilliant, just brilliant. 👍
Good video! You definitely did your research and created a high quality video. Just a few things: Drag coefficient for blunt bodies (i.e. squares, spheres, cylinders) is very dependent on another number known as "Reynold's Number", and Reynold's number is dependent on velocity, characteristic length, fluid density, and fluid viscosity. Saying drag coefficient is one exact number isn't actually accurate and the relationship is much more complex. Also, the official way to pronounce Porsche is 'porsh-uh' not just 'porsh'. Still though, good video, just wanted to give some constructive feedback.
You mean put the biggest push rod v8 you can find and get a 4 speed box behind it and slap it in a land yacht and watch yanks oaf around a circle ? Lol
1969-70 Chrysler used wind tunnels for the Charger Daytona and Plymouth Superbird as did Ford for the Torino Talledega and Mercury Cyclone. skirts for sucking the car down were used by Pete Robinson on his Top Fuel dragster 1969-70 Fan car Jim Hall Chaparral 2J 1970 car also had movable side skirts
I agree, F-1 is a fascinating sport to watch, because you constantly get to root for technology and skill. I can't imagine a fully automated automotive sport would be very interesting, because the competition of skill creates stakes and tension in the same way that watching 2 pilots square off with different skill levels and different levels of mechanical competence creates tension. PZL P.11 pilots scoring a surprising number of victories over BF-109s, as an example.
The title for the video should be: The greatest Innovations in Motorsports, because around half of the examples you used were from sports car endurance racing not just Formula One. Another cherry pick formula one nowadays is not the leading form of engineering in Motorsports that titled goes towards the FIA WEC LMP1 Hybrid class in my opinion.
Well the Jaguar C Type and Porsche 550 were never in formula one given the overlap in regulations. But the Chaparral 2E is a Can am car which shared nothing with formula one regulations in the 1960s. Also I just noticed he said the Chapparal 2E is a Le mans winning car but the 2E was never at Le mans that was the 2D and 2F which never won Le mans. Also the Porsche 917 shared nothing with formula one regulations
+Noratan Well, tell that to ABS, traction control, stability control, rear-view mirrors, paddle shifters, carbon fiber constructions, lubricants, aerodynamics/air channeling, adaptive suspension, sequential gearbox and 7 gear transmission, kinetic energy recovery systems (some models from Mini Cooper offers this technology along with few other automobile manufactures), steering wheel functions, tire compound, carbon ceramic brakes, single wheel leg nut (most vehicles have four or five lug nuts), and engine management/technology.
That 917 tho.. what a beast! Was 19 mph faster than anything previously built for Le Mans in 1969-1971, that ladies n gents is night and day in the racing world. This Porsche still holds the fastest lap at the Le Mans racing circuit to this day but of course, there have been a number of fundamental changes to the circuit since 1971.These cars were so stable that the drivers could take their hands off the steering wheel at speeds which reached 240+ mph.
"For me it's less about the drivers and more about the engineers behind them" I find it weird that you say that because I feel f1 is the exact opposite. There used to be room for engineers to come up with innovative designs (see:turbochargers, which were invented by Renault, then forbidden cause the other manufacturers complained Renault always won...). Nowadays most F1's are sensibly identical, so whether you win or not depends 90% on the pilot.
Le Sveniste no they win because they have the best car, notice that every time Hamilton won a championship the car he was in was the most dominant and most reliable car on the track? F1 is a team sport, no engineers, no cars simple as that
Mamadou du Bamboulé Renault did not invent turbo charging. They took advantage in the rule book in 1979. But it took them 3 years to finally win. You see there was this mighty engine called the Ford-Cosworth DFV. That did all the winning.
+Daniel Lomax It is permitted to pronounce it wrongly because it's not forbidden in the first place. And it is just normal. We don't pronounce "India" as the Indians do. We don't pronounce "Bejing" as the Chinese do. You don't pronounce Naples as the Italians do etc. etc. etc. etc. I could list literally millions of examples if I spoke all 6000 languages existing. You cannot expect people to know how the locals pronounce their cities. The city you know as "Zurich" the locals call "Züri" and we would not expect anybody on this planet to pronounce it as we do. People say "Switzerland" But the German speaking locals call it "Schwiiz". And the country internationally known as "Germany", "Alemaña" etc. the locals call "Deutschland". Very very different. Everything clear now?
I can understand not everybody pronouncing every name perfectly in every language. But I also think people should make whatever effort they can to pronounce things the way they were intended to be pronounced. I don't think simply pronouncing 'Le Mans' with a silent S is an unreasonable demand of any English speaker.
Ground Effect cars were banned in 1983 after 2 deaths the previous year. They've since been reinstated in a slightly different way. Also Porsche is pronounced 'Por-sha'
The aerodynamics were fascinating! But there is still plenty of room to make another video on the topic of F1 engine/powerplant innovations :)
Samm Sheperd how about F-1 innovations period. This whole video was about mostly sports car and endurance racing innovations. Not one mention of monoque chassis or using the engine as a stressed member of the car. Rear engine. This guy is a phoney.
I almost jumped when I saw this comment...rest in peace Samm...
RIP
@@soldadoryanbr7776 me too bruh
True story, they've changed the rules throughout the years, they even used wankle engines at one time.
the animations were beautifully done. really helped make the explanations clear, great work!
Yes
@@andyc9902 yes
Ok
Every one else: KERS
Why isn’t anyone talking about active suspension? That shit was used in road cars as well
Because the cry babies at Ferrari complained to the FIA and got it banned
@The GBA master Its called twin chassis
ironboy raised and drops car to increase downforce and/or straight line speed. Check out the Williams FW14 and FW15C for proof.
and Lowriders
@@KomboAndy lmao, imagine an F1 car jumping up and down like a lowrider after a race
Science: aerodynamics is fundamental in cars.
US: Ford Mustang, Dodge Charger, Chevrolet Camaro...
Funniest comment😂😂
Raghav Varma US made bricks and their aerodynamics don’t assist in handling. They just slap big engines and say thats about it.
Ahmad Tariq not true anymore, at least not with the Camaro or Mustang
@Raghav Varma that is just an exception, chill out
@Raghav Varma Ah yes, the American race.
There is a difference between KERS and cars
:)
Lmao
Rofl
🤣🤣😂
Bwahahaha
Thank you to SimScale for helping me with some animations. Check out their cloud-based simulation platform here: goo.gl/zIf7MX.
I have teamed up with DFTBA to produce some awesome shirts featuring the RE Gear Tooth Logo: Get your Real Engineering shirts at: store.dftba.com/collections/real-engineering
If you have any question let me know at: twitter.com/Fiosracht
EXTREAMLY GOOD VIDEO! I'm loving it to see your exitement of making thies videos!
This one was a lot of fun to make! Really want to make a full documentary about rally too.
Finally a relevant ad/sponsorship deal for the engineering community.
But but but missed some of the flavor of the engineering choices with regards to ground effects (the flats Ferrari and the BT46 being too wide to accommodate ground effects so had to resort to fans or not being implemented as well).
Covering the rise of AWD in rally would be awesome. Maybe the Deltawing as well.
This isn't sponsored! I'm just a fan of the platform
What are Kerrs? You keep saying that.
Curr currbin fiber
search for kinetic energy recovery system
Luchace Fox 😂😂😂 cars
Short engines for racing sports
+madattaktube Thats KERS, the Kinematic Energy Recovery System, but Luchace Fox was making a joke how the dude in the video pronounces "cars".
KERS - Kinetic Energy Recovery System... Invented earlier than I thought
you ever heard about turbos?
@@exvils ?
Williams had a ver clever solution but the regulations banned it
I think KERS would evolve into the modern day ERS but idk tho
5:25 bruh, imagine surviving all that spinning around without tipping over, only to have your neck snapped by smashing backwards into a wall.
Bruh mans probably got a concussion from the whiplash and I'm over here laughing
10:15. I couldn’t agree more. That is why I love Endurance Racing, with IMSA and WEC, the racing is more focused on the companies instead of the drivers. The HUGE problem with modern racing is that there are FAR too many restrictions, and worse yet. The BOP, which slows cars down for being too good. Racing should be the opposite of that. Teams should be congratulated for creating better cars, not beat down. Hopefully with the new Hypercar class in WEC, it will usher in a new era of racing, with the speed of modern cars, but with the Level of innovation of racing from 20 years ago
@Dr Deuteron you talking about G's?
Well... LMH even slower... and its sad
KERS is making it into some high end production cars now too.
TheSpacecraftX Toyota Hybrid uses this tech)
I wouldnt call an amarok a highend car
Chris Herrin Kinetic Energy Recovery System is a mechanism that tries to capture and story energy when the car is braking so it can be used later. in most cases this is letting the electrical engine of a hybrid charge the battery when braking.
A lot of F1 tech went to the production cars.
The LaFerrari uses the KERS as well
"The Greatest Innovations In F1" Proceeds to make the first example about LeMans
@@Fazer_600 Yes let's add the transistor to that list too... seeing how influential it was for electronics in F1.
Oh wait...
OpTic_Fraxzz YT lmao
The disc brake as we know it was developed by Jaguar and Dunlop. The technology swiftly transferred to F1. Jaguar deserves a bit of credit, even tho' they were not an F1 entrant
Le man's was apart of F1 in the 1950's
So they know the history better than you.
I would just like to say, I enjoyed the hell out of this. Thank you for your hard work, and extremely high production quality. You have an amazing production team
FIA: -outstanding- BANNED move
Fia it's James
God, it's so great to hear the old engines instead of the current embarrassing vacuum cleaners. Thanks.
Was anyone else disappointed that this didn't get into much depth about carbon fiber?
Ah well, something to look forward to in the next video I guess.
My Master's thesis was in carbon fibre reinforced plastics. It deserves a video (if not several) on it's own.
Same - I also think the lumping of monocoques crash surfaces and brake discs was rather random (in a pixie dust) sort of way.
I'm not optimistic about carbon brake discs because passenger vehicles don't need the comparative advantage, and automotive engineers focus on maximizing value for cost. No one buys cars for sub-100ft 60mph to 0 braking performance.
where did you study and what excat subject did you choose?
Studied Biomedical Engineering in my undergrad, which is essential Mechanical Engineering with a bit of biology and surgical practice thrown in. My Master's was in Aeronautical, where I specialised in composite materials. Worked in the Oil & Gas industry for three years as a composite design engineer/ product manager then. Varied....
Nomulus Norwegicus
But the People would just drive faster.
2:59 those front wheels bother me...
What kind of Scobby Doo shit is that
@Raghav Varma i think its because cameras cant keep up with the speed of rotations
@@jasonb23 no, otherwise the rear wheels would spin the other direction as well. the animator just fucked up
this is technology - patrick
YES YES YES YES
I love F1 and I love this channel. This video is perfect.
So you love F1, huh. What's your favourite team and/or driver(s)?
Because I am not willing to bash you if you disagree with me, I'll state mine: Lewis Hamilton is my favourite driver, specially now with his 4th WDC. Esteban Ocon is my 2nd favourite driver because... well I'm gay and he looks gorgeous, and his team mate Checo Pérez is the same nationality as myself. And I declare myself belonging to 2 F1 fandoms: Mercedes Petronas and Force India
And now you can enjoy the halo ;)
Perfect Bullshit. Not one thing short of ground effects had anything to do with F-1.
enjoying this season?
People: The car is more important than the driver.
Gilles Villeneuve: Hold my beer
@wise ol' man there is a better one: Hold my manual stick shift hhhhhh
Ayrton Senna:*visible frustration*
@@akafxde7245 he had the best F1 car ever made
It’s both. Total success is guaranteed if you have a good driver and a good car.
@@akafxde7245 Ayrton did say that his car assisted him a lot
I am currently studying Automotive Engineering and I really love your channel, I cannot imagine the time and effort you put in each one of your videos but I want to say that you are really good at making them. Thank you very much for all the great content you share with us.
I seriously love your videos! it makes me so happy that I am pursuing a career in mechanical engineering. Also I completely agree with you; I love racing, but my love is more towards the amount engineering people have put into these cars.
Thanks for the info!
As a 50yo engineer and race enthusiast, I am embarrassed to reveal that I've NEVER heard of Michael May's Porsche 550. This is a remarkable event. Think of what development could have been made sooner if the powers that be weren't afraid of something they couldn't understand. Same goes for the Brabham.
5:28 can we just take a moment to appreciate how the car just bounces straight off the wall
Like a Lego car lmao
Thats Newton's 3rd law right there ;)
KERS = Kinetic Energy Recovery System - used to be used in F1 as essentially a “speed boost” that could be used in a limited per-lap allocation.
it's still being used
Craftym Gaming not in F1
@@craftymgaming5362 Kers as it was is no longer being used however it has morphed into ERS which is similar but a more power is output
Brother you have one if not the best channel in all of RUclips. I love how informative it is and kind of addicted to your videos! Thank you for all this information and so perfectly explained!
When you have to learn for an exam but RealEnigneering posts a Video about F1
Imagine it's an engineering exam
Hello, I would like to thank you for provinding the subtitles, they help me very much. Thank you Real Engineering.
5:19 the errrr around the keeerrs had me dying
3:43 "the only discernible difference was the lunatics that were driving them"🤣🤣🤣🤣
"Nurembergring" LOL
Yeah thats what i Heard . Lets build a long race track and call it nurembering
Nürburgring
Nurburg not Nuremberg...... no warcrimes here ;) ..... but yeah, yet another great vid, thanks :)
Mort OOPz i hate when it's called the nuremberg ring
I used to always think that the track was in the town of Nuremberg
Well I live in Nuremberg and unfortunately I have to to travel 350km to the nürburgring so yeah, it's definitely not located in my city
"nürburgring"
Formula Anything-Goes*
*No jet/rocket engines though
Maddin1313 look up the lotus 56
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_56#Formula_One
Bryce Ring that's now but in the past other engine types such as gas turbines were allowed, hince the lotus 56b
*Formula if it wins we're banning it unless you're a big german manufacturer
Yo, waddup!
Isn't one of the reason why Carbon Ceramic rotors aren't popular for road car is due to how Carbon Ceramic rotor not being as effective as Steel rotor at low working temperature?
RDS Alphard that is indeed right
The also produce squeeking noise , dust and dont last as long as steel discs
Ovais Saand
I thought squeaking noise is due to brake pads? I didn't know they have lower lifespan, but then they're usually on expensive cars that don't cover much mileage, so it wasn't too well known.
Squeaking noise in steel brakes is due to incorrect installation which cause the brakes to vibrate and produce noise..
But Carbon cermic brakes make noise due to Carbons crystalline structure
It's a combination of the poor low temperature performance, cost, and long manufacturing times. It takes 6 months to make the Carbon-carbon rotors used in F1. Even the less expensive carbon ceramic rotors available from supercar companies cost well over $10,000
The Chaparral 2E was Jim Hall’s first car with a high mounted rear wing. It raced in the inaugural CanAm series in 1966. The Chaparral 2F was another of his designs equipped with a rear wing and raced in the Worlds Sports Car Championship. It did race at Le Mans in 1967 but failed to finish. Later in the year it won the BOAC 500 held at Brands Hatch driven by Mike Spence and Phil Hill.
@1:43 One of the greatest lines from a McLaren engineer at the time, when asked if the carbon fiber chassis was stronger and safer than the aluminum they had been using (and what everyone else was still using), his response? "I have no idea... but it's loads faster!!"
McLaren used to be at the forefront. What happened to them?
Jim Hall's Chaparrel 2J Can-Am car of 1970 was the first car to use ground effects. Using the same "fan car" technology the Brabham BT46b used. I personally love how the Brabham gets the credit for the "fan car" idea when it is not true. Jim Hall invented ground effects not Colin Chapman with Lotus.
Usually the person or entity that gets credit for "first" typically isn't the absolute first, just one of the biggest early *popularizers* of the idea or technology, the one who helped it catch on... Funny how they get all the credit, lol. It's like people thinking Van Halen invented 2-handed tapping on guitar when you can see and hear earlier recorded examples. It's just that he tweaked the technique to his own style and popularized it beyond what anyone else had done previously, so he gets automatically associated with "inventing" it when he really didn't. It's interesting how society/history works like that, lol.
This is exactly what I thought of when I saw the Chapparal reference.
AMEN! Jim Hall is responsible for many aerodynamic innovations used in auto racing and he gets so little credit. It is nice to see that there are others who recognize his importance in the technology of aerodynamics. His contributions are simply amazing. BTW If you ever get the chance visit the Chaparral wing of the Petroleum Museum in Midland. It is wonderful to see the winged wonders that changed auto racing forever. The Chaparral collection (or parts of it) do travel from time to time so call ahead and check to see if your favorite car will be there. The 2K was away when I went.
@@DeathBringer769 "van halen wasnt the first to do the thing but he also completely changed the techniqure but that totally has no grounds to say its different...because I have to have a point that works and i DONT CARE IF ITS SHIT"-You
lol
I was always partial to Tyrrell's "Wingbones" suspension shrouds from the 96 car.
FIA said"We cant have small low budget teams coming up with sick stuff like this,no sir. BANNED!
in reality it was considered a moveable aerodynamics in a pre DRS era.
Idk if its just me, but the more he says ''kerr'' the more annyoing it gets LUL
+Jake Taboada I do mate, loved every moment of it when I went on holiday there in 2014! Cheers from Holland!
THAT is an Irish accent? The way he said Jaguhar or Porsh or whatever the Nurnburgring is, made me think along the lines of some American accent or maybe New Zealand? I've heard Irish accents before but they were not like this. I'm genuinely interested btw
Strebonova2007 No he's a mick
I swear I commented something about Facts' channel, Kiwi vowel mangling and a guess at the accent in the video... but my comment is now gone :o
it's driving me crazy
@9:58
Chapman ordered Andretti to complain about rocks thrown out the fan (Murray says that if that happened, they would be thrown sideways, not out the rear), because the fan car was too quick for his cars to compete with.
I am definitely looking forward to more SimScale renderings, especially since I aspire to be an aeronautical engineer. This channel is just wow.
So did you became an aeronautical engineer in 4 years. I wish you became..
@@yashkrishnatery9082 I'm on course to become one actually! I got accepted into my dream school in France and am now in my second year of studying there. Thank you for the wishes!
I really enjoy formula 1 cause it combine the two things I love the most: engeneering and car's races😁👌👌
Kerr, kerrs and kerbon. what are these things?
Irish accent. In order: car, kers (kinetic energy recovery system), carbon
It's Kerbin.. it's a fictional planet... Kerbin disks Kerbin fiber etc... It was make in Kerbal Space Program ;P
Gerard van Doornmalen I’m literally playing it rn, trying to put a station into LKO
@@gerardvandoornmalen1977 Ruled by Kerbin Khan :P
"Roar of the engines." Yeah...yeah.
?
Hear the scream of the Turbo V6 x)
I guess he's complaining about the sound the new engines have
Abhishek cherath I know what you mean.
More sound = More energy wasted...
Wasn't expecting to find such a high quality video. Well done!
I think F1 is about engineering more than the drivers too - but they are the personality.
Excellent video.
I like kerrs
i like dags too
I like dags.
Gordon Murray is genius.
Krzysztof Urban very true, though Ferdinand Porsche was more than a genius
Just like to point out, we will likely never see carbon ceramic breaks in normal street cars. Steel rotors are better at low temperatures and street cars don't see the kind of repeated high stress breaking scenarios that race cars do.
Not unless you're driving a ridiculously overpowered car through stop and go inner city traffic.
Actually carbon breaks on street cars have a big disadvantage. The produced dust can clog the pores in the disc and damage them. Carbon discs have to become hot enough to burn this dust which rarely happens in public driving.
Speak for yourself peasant
Carbon brakes also do not heat up enough to operating temp in normal street driving, meaning that they will not operate as well as steel discs.
No mention of the Gurney Flap, the safety innovations pioneered by Jackie Stewart, fuel safety, having the engine as the chassis, the F-duct, the raised nose, KERS, the fancy telemetry but we do get a few bits of info about Porsche who don't do F1.
side radiators on the lotus 72 which made the aerodynamics of the modern f1 car possible
I actually loved the fact that you showed a clip of ANA's 787
F1 KERS have KERS.
Speach 100
And use kirbin foyber
F1 ker ker manufacturer kerbon fiber production ker
Wright Marshall kerbon foiber
Shurrup bleedin sap ye no nutin’
HAHA this is funny
I'm Crying lol
The greatest innovation in F1 has to be the Maldonator. He made quite a few spectacles during his service.
I really love your channel. You managed to keep it unique and professional in the same time.
Fantastic video. Massive help on my EPQ on the evolution on F1 cars. Thanks!
Frist off, I am in extreme admiration of this channel, as one of my dreams in life is to become an engineer so I'm find your commentery very crisp and to the point but this Venturi effect your speaking of, I knew it as Bernoulli's principle
kirbin foyber
Dick Dousche lmfao XD
Dick Dousche hahahaha
"'roar of the engines'' maybe in the past yeah nowadays they sound like vacuum cleaners
Powered by Electrolux
I came back to this video just for the one line "the only difference was the lunatics driving the cars". Still watched the whole video, but that line is so brilliant.
Hey man, good video, well done! Totally worth the watch, learned somethings I didn't know or think about.
Damn 1970 f1 cars are the best looking
I don't get why the regulations are so strict... Of course you need to establish some rules for safety's sake, but if the goal is to design the fastest car, why not just let the engineers build whatever is within reason? Why put up so many restrictions?
They want it to be a fair race, the drivers must be able to have fun as well.
Yeah as was said above, look at how many complaints mercedes got fort he last 2 seasons (and red bull for the 4 years before that) that it was boring because one car was clearly better than all the others. If you have unlimited rules the team with the most money usually wins...
That what GP2 and all the single make series are for. Who is saying that with everyone working from the same rulebook makes it unfair anyway?
fair races are boring ;)
But so are Bullshit - adjustable Spoilers :D
+MRoesterreicher1 speaking of bullshit, "fan boost" in Formula E
Great job!
Love your accent, mate - F1 “caer” :))
People like you don't get enough credit for the ability to present and explain such a highly detailed and complicated subject that is hard to understand for most people, especially people in the f1 world who'd rather learn about this stuff than read gossip about journalists taking drivers' words the wrong way and write a whole misleading article about it. *cough cough express.co.uk cough cough
Great video! I would love to continue learning more about more recent engineering feats within formula one. I hope you continue doing more videos.
Real Engineering: Are you Irish?
Yes he's irish
KEEERRRRRR
Nah man, it's just an act. He is actually a italian woman
@@Zephirot080 sounds like that.
When i heard him i knew he was irish because how he says car he says it ker
3/4 of a million views in two months.
Well done. U deserve it
I’m also from Ireland but can’t help noticing kyarr pronunciation😂😂😂
The greatest innovation is the way F1 is utilized as a product in order to simultaneously push and finance the tech innovations. Brilliant, just brilliant. 👍
Brilliant analysis, mate. Really good.
It seems that the steel age is finally coming to a close. The true polymer age can now begin.
Jasmine Ju but what about a alloy age
+james edwards
steel is an alloy.
What next? Polymer firearms? No wait
@@TheMegaPingasMobile boo, bad joke
@@eriktruchinskas3747 you can 3d print guns
Good video! You definitely did your research and created a high quality video. Just a few things: Drag coefficient for blunt bodies (i.e. squares, spheres, cylinders) is very dependent on another number known as "Reynold's Number", and Reynold's number is dependent on velocity, characteristic length, fluid density, and fluid viscosity. Saying drag coefficient is one exact number isn't actually accurate and the relationship is much more complex. Also, the official way to pronounce Porsche is 'porsh-uh' not just 'porsh'. Still though, good video, just wanted to give some constructive feedback.
The Storm what are you smoking? Did his research? This wasn't even about Formula 1 save for ground effects and that wasn't even an original F-1 idea.
nurburgring, not nuremburg ring, or nurnburg, whichever he said lol
Bo Huggabee Nürburgring*
Ryan Kelly >.>
Bo Huggabee he also mispronounced "WXB" he said XWB
Actually we have a City in Germany called Nürnberg (int. NUREMBERG) but it's about 500km from the Nürburgring 🤣
Thanks for the upload mate 👍👍👍
Marvelous video that is not only informative, but extremely insightful.
Now how about "Greatest Innovations In NASSCAR"...Oh wait
You mean put the biggest push rod v8 you can find and get a 4 speed box behind it and slap it in a land yacht and watch yanks oaf around a circle ? Lol
1969-70 Chrysler used wind tunnels for the Charger Daytona and Plymouth Superbird as did Ford for the Torino Talledega and Mercury Cyclone. skirts for sucking the car down were used by Pete Robinson on his Top Fuel dragster 1969-70 Fan car Jim Hall Chaparral 2J 1970 car also had movable side skirts
" Naskerr "
Real Engineering: The Greatest Innovations in Formula One
FIA: BANNED.
Good video. I would like to hear you pronounce, "Cars and KERS"
Thank you for illustrating Jim Hall's Chaparral with its famous # 66.
I agree, F-1 is a fascinating sport to watch, because you constantly get to root for technology and skill. I can't imagine a fully automated automotive sport would be very interesting, because the competition of skill creates stakes and tension in the same way that watching 2 pilots square off with different skill levels and different levels of mechanical competence creates tension. PZL P.11 pilots scoring a surprising number of victories over BF-109s, as an example.
love how they sped up the le mans footages to make it like they were faster xD
If you've ever seen old video clips you'll see the motion is sped up in them too.
The title for the video should be: The greatest Innovations in Motorsports, because around half of the examples you used were from sports car endurance racing not just Formula One. Another cherry pick formula one nowadays is not the leading form of engineering in Motorsports that titled goes towards the FIA WEC LMP1 Hybrid class in my opinion.
ranul kumara and Super GT
le mans and f1 used to be very similar in what cars were entered. At least when he said those examples. the FIA was very loose with regs and the WDC
Well the Jaguar C Type and Porsche 550 were never in formula one given the overlap in regulations. But the Chaparral 2E is a Can am car which shared nothing with formula one regulations in the 1960s. Also I just noticed he said the Chapparal 2E is a Le mans winning car but the 2E was never at Le mans that was the 2D and 2F which never won Le mans. Also the Porsche 917 shared nothing with formula one regulations
+Noratan Well, tell that to ABS, traction control, stability control, rear-view mirrors, paddle shifters, carbon fiber constructions, lubricants, aerodynamics/air channeling, adaptive suspension, sequential gearbox and 7 gear transmission, kinetic energy recovery systems (some models from Mini Cooper offers this technology along with few other automobile manufactures), steering wheel functions, tire compound, carbon ceramic brakes, single wheel leg nut (most vehicles have four or five lug nuts), and engine management/technology.
He also missed the tail end of the 917 line where about 1500 hp was attained from the car.
damn i'm early!
but i will watch only later, goota keep the best ones for last :)
Turun Ambartanen same
Turun Ambartanen best? This guy is an idiot. He's feeding you bullshit. Not one thing mentioned except for ground effects is an F-1 innovation.
F1 is a good example of function over fashion, where the things that make it work end up more beautiful than any designer could have come up with.
This video is super well made. Please do more F1 technologies!
The best would be to replace FIA after the 2019 Canadian GP
5 second penalty for hate on FIA
Can you do a NASCAR based video? There are TONS of technological advances that have been made in Nascar through the years.
Technological advancements in Nascar... are you joking?
We don't care to know how they got the drivers to stop fucking their cousins.
@@ChineseSweatShoppe I love that the internet can unite on one thing: fuck nascar.
"Cers"
-Real Engineering
That 917 tho.. what a beast! Was 19 mph faster than anything previously built for Le Mans in 1969-1971, that ladies n gents is night and day in the racing world. This Porsche still holds the fastest lap at the Le Mans racing circuit to this day but of course, there have been a number of fundamental changes to the circuit since 1971.These cars were so stable that the drivers could take their hands off the steering wheel at speeds which reached 240+ mph.
Fair play just came across this channel & it’s absolutely amazing man congratulations on some awesome content
Everyone’s concerned about how you’re pronouncing “cars” meanwhile I’m concerned about how you’re pronouncing Porsche
"For me it's less about the drivers and more about the engineers behind them"
I find it weird that you say that because I feel f1 is the exact opposite. There used to be room for engineers to come up with innovative designs (see:turbochargers, which were invented by Renault, then forbidden cause the other manufacturers complained Renault always won...). Nowadays most F1's are sensibly identical, so whether you win or not depends 90% on the pilot.
Le Sveniste Yeah sure, maybe when Mercedes stops winning literally every single race.
Car Of Doom They don't win because of their cars. They win because of Hamilton.
If they're winning because of Hamilton then how is the other driver still up there?
Le Sveniste no they win because they have the best car, notice that every time Hamilton won a championship the car he was in was the most dominant and most reliable car on the track? F1 is a team sport, no engineers, no cars simple as that
Mamadou du Bamboulé Renault did not invent turbo charging. They took advantage in the rule book in 1979. But it took them 3 years to finally win. You see there was this mighty engine called the Ford-Cosworth DFV. That did all the winning.
It's not pronounced Le ManSSSSS. It's French. The 'S' is silent.
and Porsche is two syllables unless one is a teen girl.
The French say "Amerik" instead of "America". Therefore no reason to complain.
Don't understand why permitting the mispronunciation of one word permits the mispronunciation of another.
+Daniel Lomax It is permitted to pronounce it wrongly because it's not forbidden in the first place. And it is just normal. We don't pronounce "India" as the Indians do. We don't pronounce "Bejing" as the Chinese do. You don't pronounce Naples as the Italians do etc. etc. etc. etc. I could list literally millions of examples if I spoke all 6000 languages existing. You cannot expect people to know how the locals pronounce their cities.
The city you know as "Zurich" the locals call "Züri" and we would not expect anybody on this planet to pronounce it as we do. People say "Switzerland" But the German speaking locals call it "Schwiiz". And the country internationally known as "Germany", "Alemaña" etc. the locals call "Deutschland". Very very different.
Everything clear now?
I can understand not everybody pronouncing every name perfectly in every language. But I also think people should make whatever effort they can to pronounce things the way they were intended to be pronounced. I don't think simply pronouncing 'Le Mans' with a silent S is an unreasonable demand of any English speaker.
the engines in the intro were sweet, sweet music
I never ever had a formula 1 advertisement before, until I clicked the video
Thank you
Ground Effect cars were banned in 1983 after 2 deaths the previous year. They've since been reinstated in a slightly different way.
Also Porsche is pronounced 'Por-sha'
It‘s not pronounced like that.
Only by yanks.
Kerhs
The greatest innovations in f1
Wings
Carbon fibre
Side skirts
KERRS
Lauda is such an legendary human. I Believe there's a entire movie dedicated to him and James hunt. Called "Rush" I believe.