10 genius F1 innovations that were outlawed
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 май 2024
- Formula 1 designers are always pushing the boundaries to come up with new ideas that will give their cars a technical edge. And even as the rules get more restrictive, the best minds in the paddock still find new ways to exploit the regulations. But sometimes ideas are so clever, the rules end up being changed to prevent something that was never supposed to be allowed in the first place, or would be needlessly expensive for everyone to copy. Or sometimes, rival teams just complain enough that eventually they manage to get it banned. In this video Edd Straw picks out 10 incredible ideas that are no longer allowed today
McLAREN BRAKE PEDAL ARTICLE FROM McLAREN.COM
www.mclaren.com/racing/inside...
READ MORE HERE
the-race.com/formula-1/the-su...
#F1 #F1tech #banned
Subscribe: the-race.com/youtube_subscribe
Website: the-race.com/
Twitter: @wearetherace
Instagram: @wearetherace
Facebook: / wearetherace
Podcasts: the-race.com/podcasts
Thanks for watching - please like, share and comment, please also hit subscribe to show your support so we'll keep doing what we're doing.
www.the-race.com
/ wearetherace 
Спорт
![Chance The Rapper, DJ Premier - Together (2024) | [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZVwTX6WP-MM/mqdefault.jpg)
The ultimate achievement for an F1 engineer is to design something so good that it gets outlawed
It's like getting called a hacker in a game when you're actually not hacking
@@hozhuofeng9877 but still getting banned in the game
@@stijnschelkens1146 That is a different story
@@hozhuofeng9877 more like being called a hacker but your mods don’t break any rules
It's such a paradox , I guess ultimately it's better to give slight amount of performance increase in the most subtle way . Not enough to illicit an audit and therefore ban, just enough to give the slightest edge. So it can be used for an entire season or seasons .
F1: we want to be the most technologically advanced racing series
Also F1: no not like that
All about money though ain't it, they didn't want costs to go through the roof for manufacturers. Then you get merc spending £250mil+ a year these past years and winning everything lol.
f1 teams wants that, FIA dont
Innovation flourishes when limitations are in place. That's the beauty. If there were no limitations, it would be much less interesting
FIA outlaws their inventions
Ummm you do realize that some of these innovation are outlawed because the team *voted* for them being outlawed right?
Now that there's a budget cap, I kinda want the FIA to simply say set the rules in terms of maximum car size, weight, and Safety features - and then let everyone (within the Budget Cap) go wild.
As cool as that would be to see, it would go against the FIA's desire to see closer racing.
that's exactly what I was thinking. Imagine the crazy cars we could see tearing up the grid. But unfortunately that would mean 1 team would almost always be dominant for a season having found the best package or innovation that the rest would scramble to copy for the rest if the season to catch up
They need to force jackwads like Mercedes to narrow their cars down. There's no real racing in F1 anymore specifically because of Mercedes in particular making every new car an inch or two wider on every iteration, ON PURPOSE, so no one can pass them, ever.
@@kitalalaris 🤣🤣🤣🤣
You do realize car width is specified in the rule book right? It's one of the things the scrutineers look at. I guarantee every car on the grid is the same width within a couple of mm.
@@kitalalaris Me thinks you need to read the regulations. Teams don't get to make their cars arbitrarily wide.
Blown diffusers were by far my favorites over the years. A big fat middle finger to the FIA reg writers, courtesy of some clever engineering. :)
the sound of it is what i miss most abt it
@@eldenyoe7015 RB-7 goes BRRT BRRT BRRRRTTT
Hearing the sound of blown diffusers echoing in Singapore while I was going around in the city got me into F1. They sounded monstrous!
I cant understand, why blown diffuser is not allowed?
Exhaust gas still gonna be wasted anyway..
The F-duct was my favourite.
It's so elegant and simple, yet a very clever loophole.. You aren't allowed moveable aero devices. However, the driver covering a hole in the cockpit with their left leg down the straights caused it to stall airflow over the rear wing making it more slippery. It wasn't a moveable aero device, but acted like one.
Wish they never banned the exhaust blowing. The downshifts sounded amazing
Well it’s the FIA, what did you expect?
Those downshifts sounded like farting
Electric guitar fart
@@stellar6643 Nah mate have you heard Webber and Vettel downshifting at Monza in 2011? Reminded me of the A-10 Warthog
That woukd made these Wek sounding V6s spin actually decent
That tuned mass damper was a marvel of engineering.
Would like to see it back I’d think it be cool
FIA : Do I smell innovation?
*Banned*
The mass damper should be made legal. It would help trickle it down to street cars, where it would help the everyday car.
Mass damper help improve stability... It made no sense why it was banned in the first place.. It doesn't create a safety issue.
So many of these bans made no sense. Rear wheel steering, fans, independent height controlled suspension, F-duct, double diffusers... So many should be allowed...
Most of these would have trickled down to street cars and made them better.
@@Leshic2 moat were banned to stop teams spending so much...but tith the budget cap ur right...many of these shpuld be allowed...teams can only spend what the budget it, so you wouldnt have limitless spending on development for all of them....teams would use the ones they could make effectively and cheaply
@@Leshic2 as was said in the video - mass dampers were banned cause Ferrari wanted them banned
The "Twin Chassis" Colin Chapman designed was a mad idea in the ground effect days. Driver sat in the chassis that carried the engine and running gear whilst the bodywork was a separate chassis that was allowed to flex under down force and create more ground effect. The other teams put a protest in and the FIA banned it before it had a chance to race.
Yes. It was Chapman finding a loophole in wording of the regulations. They stated the driver, engine, suspension etc must all be attached to the chassis. The plural of chassis is chassis so Chapman figured he could have more than one and suspend the driver in the inner chassis and have everything else bolted to the outer chassis.
Lotus twin chassis.
Before the season started It originally passed scrutineering and was allocate a chassis number by the FIA and classed as legal to race. It was only banned after Ferrari got wind of it and complained.
The comments at the time were “if it was painted red and had a prancing horse on the front, it would have been allowed to race”
What I've read indicates that he twin chassis was something that worked much better in a wind tunnel than on the traack. Any changes of attitude between the chassis would result in potentially sudden and extreme changes in downforce, like when the suspension loading would change during a multiple-apex corner. supposedly the drivers were not sad to see it outlawed.
@Rob G That's true of most of what's in here lol.
@@robg521
*_”It was only banned after Ferrari got wind of it and complained.”_*
Not true. Not even close.
The scrutineers at Silverstone might have felt like giving old mate Colin a bit of encouragement but the real opposition came from within FOCA. The FISA, as it was known then, stepped in when a lot of British teams objected. Of course, they’d be perfectly happy for you to blame Ferrari and the FIA (which didn’t exist then).
One rather glaring omission - the dual-chassis Lotus Type 88. I made a slideshow full of these banned innovations for an engineering class in high school and made a point of including that insane piece of machinery.
One chassis to bear the brunt of ground effect aero, the other to house the driver and protect them from the rough ride and porpoising that entailed the era's hydropneumatic suspension. The design only ever saw one race weekend in Long Beach, and Colin Chapman was adamant that it be allowed to race....to the point that he hired a Nixon lawyer to back him up!
The design was banned the moment it showed up, and Chapman then declared that he would head off to Florida to watch the space shuttle launch, as F1 no longer valued mankind's technological advancement. Ouch.
Interesting facts about the double chassis:
The word 'chassis' is both singular and plural. So you say: 1 chassis, 2 chassis, unlike 1 tyre, 2 tyres. That was the loophole in the regulation Chapman took advantage of.
Lotus drivers hated double chassis cause it was inconsistent when cornering, so it gave a totally unpredictable car behavior. Wouldn't have been successful anyway.
@@gabormiklay9209 that's why it's called innovation. You run it and make improvements where rough spots come up in field testing.
@@thatguybrody4819 Haha. Actually chassis is plural both in counts and timeline... 🤔
The term 'dual chassis' was just semantics. Chapman knew it and so did everyone else.
Something about that mass damper was so simple yet effective. What a shame it got banned
Mamaia Ferrari..
I personally find that insulting to the engineers who spend so much time developing such a fine tune equipment to have it banned.
@@rohitnautiyal7090 I agree, it’s not like it’s a intentional loop hole like the diffuser or blown exhaust. It was such a simple item tuned to perfection. Imagine todays cars with a tuned mass damper, maybe there will be more aggressive driving manoeuvres
@@Kirinboi alonso will jumping on kerbs aggresively like 2005 renault 😁
Maybe they will make a comeback, in MotoGP mass dampers are in full effect as well as some gyroscopic stabilisers
Imagine how different all the cars would be if none of these were banned. Some of these can't work together so they would have to pick and choose the right combination for their drivers.
One way would become the fastest over time and that would become universally adopted
The cars would be too fast as drivers would pass out from g forces ,, it happened in indy cars ,the race had to be cancelled.
Get real. The racing would be awful! One team would develop the best solution and would walk the championship.
You need to watch the engineering robot challenges. F1 is not for you.
@@procatprocat9647 When being the smartest and fastest is loosing.They need an open class
@@unfairfight3625 pffff a fighter jet can do that
Why would you drive knowingly to pass out
A fighter jet has more forces than a car
But its not the point
You just wouldn’t push it that hard
I was lucky enough to attend the first GP in Phoenix, and sit next to Mario & Michael Andretti (the year before he move to F1) and Bobby Rahal. It was during the Friday practice session, and the three of them pointed out the Williams and it's active suspension. The next hour was a lesson in how aero and suspension worked, and I got to go with them down to just outside the final turn and they showed me how the Williams (and I think Ferrari as well) worked coming into the turn and then exiting onto the main straight. While all other cars would dive/squat under both braking and acceleration, the Williams would just lower down smoothly. It was fascinating to watch, and even more amazing to hear 3 legends talk about it. As they politely said their goodbye's after practice to go into the pits, Michael looked at me and said "You're going to want to be a Maclaren fan next year" and gave me a wink. Pretty cool stuff.
Nice one Paul. It’s great to hear that some of the big names in F1 are so passionate about the sport that they will share their observations with a fellow fan. It obviously made your day👍
It would be great to have an " outlawed" F1 series, just to see who can really make a difference. It would be interesting for the engineering crowd and fans , but sponsorship might be tough to obtain at least initially.
I like this idea a lot. Give them a spec engine and gearbox, apply a cost cap, and let the engineers go nuts. Award prize money for the most devious ideas.
@@alaeriia01 yeah it could really be advantageous for the entire sport.
they had “outlawed” system in rally with group B you see how that went
@@skittlesbutwithchocolatein2274 yeah but those group b guys are already crazy. 😉
They had Can-am racing back in the 1960s, 70s and 80s which was pretty much that. Sadly the interest wore off and it was discontinued. The fan car called Chapparal 2j, is the only car being banned in that series because of how overpowered it was lol
Imagine if all these were not banned.
We'd could have ended up an 8 wheel steering fan car with ground effect, active suspension, blow double diffusers and flexible wings 😳
Drivers would probably be blacking out due to the G-loads in corners.
@@thomas316 or they'll be wearing compression suits like fighter pilots wear 😉
Have no head left after snapping them off.
It sounds cool in concept, but it would just give evidence to the main accusation other racing classes and types always throw up in F1’s face: that the cars are not relevant to road-going cars.
Sounds like hot-rod children toy XD someone should design one in 3d Totally bonkers
2:03 - Not me just realising that I had a piece of F1 technology on my wrist when growing up! So funny to see that casio watch being glued onto the steering - F1 has come a long way
Live timing 😂
Still have mine now and works spiffing
I’ve still got mine haha, there’s a reason it was used back then, it’s so simple, easy to read, and doesn’t show you anything you don’t need, love it
Vaughn Sigal speaking of that I've got mine on now 😂
I've got one of those attached to a vent on my dash.
The strap broke, and I had two of them so the other one gets worn when I'm working and the broken strap on the other one is ideal for threading into an unused air vent.
F1: Wants to be at the pinnacle of innovation and performance.
Also F1: That's too innovative and performs too well.
Then they ban the invention, and engineers and designers will create even MORE genius inventions. You seem to not get the point. Innovation flourishes with more restrictions. Restrictions pushes these engineers to come up with better stuff. Then the better stuff gets banned, engineers make more genius inventions, and so on and so forth until it reaches the absolute maximum point science can allow. Some of the innovations we have seen in the past 10 years might not be realized if they didn't ban other innovations 20 years ago.
F1 is the pinnacle of laws and restrictions
“Formula” refers to a set of regulations. Complaining that formula 1 is regulated is like complaining that you can’t carry the ball by hand in soccer. The regulations ARE the sport.
Unless Ferrari invented it, then it's okay.
@@IZn0g0uDatAll I just wish it were more like whacky races... Or Twisted Metal.
That game fuckin' slapped.
Actually the 'fluidic switch' made a comeback when Mercedes pioneered the "Double DRS" idea.
My favourite innovation was the piano wire used by RedBull. They ran a high tensile resistive wire to the rear and front wing which would be momentarily heated by applying voltage to relieve tension (as a wire gets hot it increases in length) on the straights allowing the front wing to 'relax' and generate less drag. Sadly it was banned so they had to go to aerodynamically actuated flexi wings which themselves have been an ongoing battle with the FIA since. 😅
Yo I've never heard of this "piano wire" trick! The _little_ things teams come up with, man.....
Was discovered after a crash when other teams noticed all the wires running inside the nose cone and worked it out. To scrutineers it just looked like tensile strengthening.
@@thomas316 Good thing that didn't trickle down. Sir your oil change is done but we noticed your pianos were out of tune- that'll be $445 with the luthiers' fees.
Perfect timing with your upload. Just sat down on the throne! 👌
Same xD
Blown diffuser in action
Happy to be of service! 😂
I bet you had great rear downforce
You forgot this mate 👑 😂
The only bans I found having some justification on this video were the ones related do gizmo bans (where FIA was trying to make pilots more decisive for performance) and the DAS (given the cost cap current philosophy) . As for the other innovations I really didn't get why they were banned. None of them were dangerous, dubious or only achievable by deep pocket teams.
Mostly agree but the f duct can be dangerous because it made the drivers take one hand off the steering wheel at high speeds. Most of the cockpit innovations throughout history were made so the drivers can have both hands on the wheel (gear shifters, clutch, buttons on the wheel etc.) but the f duct did the opposite. Still would've been interesting to see how F1 would've evolved if the other ones weren't disallowed...
Keep in mind that the damper is not something you would like to have in front of you if you were to pay a visit to the tyre wall
@@f2b32 I mean mclaren introduced it by putting the hole where the drivers legs were but Ferrari and every other team just put the hole near the steering wheel
The only bans I consider fair play are bans for safety and maybe cost, everything else is fair play. F1 is supposed to be a team sport and engineering playground before anything else, There's feeder and spec for more driver based championships.
If Ferrari can’t make it work the it’s illegal, if not now, by the end of the season. This was a well established fact before the took over at the FIA.
I think my favorite thing to learn about is the exhaust blowing, and how many times they tried to stop it by changing position, only for engineers to just be like "oh, that's fine, we'll just redirect the flow"
My favorites are the ones being used now that we won't know about for years to come because they must be absolutely brilliant to evade the FIA. And I love everything that can be snuck past officials.
An alien disguised in a Max Verstappen suit
Any time the words "Benetton" and "never raced" are mentioned, read "Benetton" and "Never discovered by the scrutineers".
Every team pushes the rules and every team cheats... it’s racing!
Edit: Schumacher cheated
@@Red5_ There were rumors that Schumacher cheated somehow but nothing was proven.
I'd love to see the teams be able to go nuts with their designs for 1 season and see what happens
Merc, RedBull or Ferrari absolutely dominate because they can literally buy anything
The cars wouldn't be driveable by humans anymore as the g forces would literally break their necks.
With sufficient cornering speeds drivers will simply pass out.
@@Benjamin-xv9le Bullshit. How the hell do fighter jets exist?
@@mitchell-wallisforce7859 your jet fighter isn't running an average 3-3.5g over the course of 90min. Yes they do experience high g and in some cases higher but not for the extended period of time like F1
"Hey guys we got this great new idea. What we do is..."
"BANNED!"
"Ok, well based on the new rules we could instead..."
"BANNED!"
"How about..."
"BANNED!"
"But..."
"BANNED!"
Formula BANNED
I am subscribed to many channels that release F1 related content and yours is by far the best of them. You do a great job diving into the technical details and manage to cover complex topics in a really tight and efficient manner. I really appreciate all the hard work you put in. Well done indeed. Thank you.
I think the Fan car by Gordon Murray is such an icon of engineering that it still *blows my mind* Love seeing the 70's photos also, it's such a different time to now.
Ironically in his Behind The Grid interview he didn't think too much of it, and felt it was a relatively quick hack
The “fan car” idea was borrowed from Chaparral
Hahaha fan car…. Blew your mind.. get it
Can-Am series in North america pioneered the design.
They also pioneered many of the side skirt aero piece to seal the beneath of the car
I see what you did there
06:25 F-duct inspired the idea of DRS, so it still exists in the form of the Drag Reduction System.
The fan car will always be my favorite crazy idea from how much of a "science fair project" look it had, combined with how effective it was on track.
By far it was 1982 and the Brabham BT49's "liquid cooled brakes". It allowed the car to race way under-weight, but the regs allowed for a car to have it's coolant topped off before scrutineering. Presto! Car is back to legal weight. Pure genius!
FIA: Let’s make F1 safe
Also FIA: Bans ABS and Traction Control
FIA: Let’s make pit stops slow instead
Traction control was made illegal because it took away the skills of needing to drive the car same with Abs. It's called drivers aids. Anything that helps the driver control the car was made illegal. Making sure it's down to the driver to race the car and not technology.
driver aids like ABS and TC aren't considered safety systems in motorsport, maybe safety would be higher if they were implemented but not implicitly, only by reducing frequency of crashes not the danger of them, the cars would be much much safer if they went only 100kmh but we don't want to see that either same way the sport is better with less driver aids
ABS and traction control were banned to make overtaking easier because the leading car will make more mistakes with both braking and acceleration. I think they should create some other means to make overtaking easier than crippling the cars.
Maybe go back to 2005 regulations where tires can be made as perfect as possible (currently tires are intentionally bad, especially the soft compounds) but you cannot change them during the race? That would allow going faster if you're willing to sacrifice tire surface but you'll suffer later in the race if you do that.
@@MikkoRantalainen well if you go to the FIA site. It says there ABS and TS was banned to take away driver's ads to put it in the skills of each driver. Having tires compounds break down fast makes racing more tactical. They need to make them even more soft. Also should make two stops in forced or use all three compounds in a race. Having tires that can last a full race only means its about hard racing and nothing else.
Pit stops should be made especially slow because they promote the mentality of the thow-away society. The modern F1 policy of penalising engine & gearbox changes to promote careful use & reliable design should be extended to tyres.
From what I understand the biggest issue with the P34, Goodyear refusing to supply them with updated rubber aside (probably at the behest of Ferrari) was that when the attitude of the car changed or bumps were hit the wheelbase of the car could temporarily change making the balance very unpredictable. Likely a defect they could have minimized eventually but it wasn't to be sadly. I have sat in the cockpit of the P34 and it was kind of a magical feeling.
Would have been good to reference the lap time benefit of each of these innovations. Bans on the basis other teams protest need the context of how scared they are.
lap time benefit is pretty tricky to quantify. If you make some system that allows you to win a race by being 0.2 seconds a lap faster on one track (and then it gets banned) would it have been otherwise equal?
In fact if you remove that trick it could be 3 seconds a lap slower. How would we really know.
@@ribbonsofnight Compare the lap times of the car before and after the changes with the same driver.
Or look at theoretical improvement. One of the engineers would have had to show that whatever was outlawed would have increased speed. They probably would have had some graphs that show the expected difference.
For me, the Exhaust blown diffusers made F1 even more amazing audio wise (The Mclaren, Lotus and Red Bull being a huge favorite of mine). I missed the odd cutting out sound that TCS gave F1 cars in the early 2000s so this kinda made up for that. Its why I love how the current cars sound under braking and off throttle. I can't explain why but I have a soft spot for those kinds of sounds in general even outside of F1 (Such as that weird off-throttle Burble on the Ford GT GTLM or that sputtering effect on both the Nissan V6 in the ByKolles LMP1 and the V6 in the Acura ARX-05)
I will say that both the Fan car and the six wheels are also cool just in how clever they were (And I would argue the standout example of looking at a rulebook and going "Well, they didn't say we couldn't do it..")
4 wheel drive and steering would have been fascinating to see.
4WD makes the car heavier and the grip/traction it gives does not make up for the added weight. It has been tried before in the 60s and 70s and none of the cars that had it were particularly successful.
Would 4 wheel steering be that beneficial? At Monaco probably, the Monza chicanes probably, but a tighter turning radius doesn't always equate to more corner speed. Adding more wheel angle would scrub more speed potentially and you'd pay a weight penalty. I've driven 4 wheel steer RC cars and they are way more twitchy and hard to drive, but I'm sure F1 engineers could make them drivable.
@@mgers75 something that maybe Mercedes could use and something that RB would definitely avoid.
I understand the negative elements of it, but I don't think it should be banned. In fact I think it makes the sport more interesting having not differentiation.
Just because it's legal doesn't mean all the teams will actually use it. I don't get why it gets to be outlawed.
@@kapilbusawah7169 no one would use it
no one in their mind would want a 4 wheel drive as a f1 car. That alone just doesn't even make sense.
I wish there was a series, either F1 or similar, that had very few rules or regulations. Let the technology and drivers participate uninhibited. It would bring an inherent danger, but these drivers are top-notch and know what they're getting themselves into.
Pike peak unlimited class
Group C, until a certain point
Can Am 1966-74
Off throttle blown diffusers made the most incredible noise
Been saying for years they need to bring back ground effects to resolve the passing issues, and we're getting it next year
Great piece. Please do more of these
The blown diffuser is my favourite. The sound it made was beautiful.
The thing about Sweden 1978, Mario Andretti in fact started from pole and despite Bernie Eccleston trying to throw the other teams off the scent by having his cars qualify on full tanks, John Watson started second and Niki Lauda third
Not only on full tanks, Watson and Lauda were also specifically told to sangbag even on a full fuel load, as well as sandbagging during the race
From what I understand, Bernie was actually quite annoyed with Niki in particular, as he wasn't sandbagging enough.
EDIT: Further context:
Bernie didn't want to make it clear to the competitors exactly how much benefit the Fan Car had. As such, he instructed anyone who piloted the cars (this being NIki Lauda and John Watson) to be careful with how fast they went. Indeed, the pair "only" qualified second and third, with Watson being sixth-tenths of a second behind the fastest time. (For reference, the top 5 were within 1.5 seconds of the leader; the top 11 cars were within two seconds of the leader.)
After the pole sitter Mario Andretti spun on the 18th lap, the two cars took the lead easily; John Watson himself didn't last long up front, as he spun just a lap later, apparently suffering issues with his throttle. But what really got everyone's attention was a bit of an accident. Just eight laps into the race, a slower car began dropping oil onto the track. It was at this point the advantage the Fan Car had was made incredibly obvious, as while everyone else struggled for control, the Fan Car seemed virtually unaffected by the slick race track. Niki Lauda managed to win the race by a massive thirty-four seconds over his next rival, and only three cars in total managed to stay on the lead lap.
It should be noted that Niki himself stated he still wasn't trying to show how fast the car really was, suggesting he was still sandbagging when he took the checkered flag.
Infinite downforce is a hell of a drug...
My favourite outlawed design is the rear steer braking. Its been around for a long time in tractors and i think its cool to see it worked into high performance cars considering it was used in well no performance tractors
I actually loved the idea of the Full Throttle Control.
Run by BMW Sauber Team in it's heyday (probably by more teams), it basically left the throttlebodies wide open, based in GPS position on the track, even though the driver would lift the throttle (e.g. through Eau Rouge).
Basically an autopilot that knew when to accelerate from GPS
That's not dangerous... That's straight up psychopathic
Fuel tank buffer?
The process of always pumping fuel at max rate and then save the excess fuel from driving slower than what the engine consumes in a buffer to use later on the straights, giving a some extra hp.
10 innovations that were banned. Okay, here’s what we should do: at the end of the season, let each team choose a technology from this video to put on their car, chosen in reverse order. Then, run a 3 race mini season in January and February reserve or development drivers. Top 3 drivers get superlicenses, and top 3 teams get 5, 4, 3 extra testing days with next year’s car, respectively.
Two things were missing. #1 - Ground effect sliding skirts.
#2 - Lotus 88 Twin Chassis. I have never been able to figure out how that trick was supposed to work.
Excellent video. Thanks. More technical videos. Please.
Benetton's automatic launch control system was pure genius. Didn't last long before being outlawed though.
Mass damper is one of the ones I have the most respect for, but I'd be a liar if I pretended the 6 wheel cars didn't fascinate me in a way no other gizmo has.
This video bought back so many memories of F1 over the yrs…
It's good to know Ed is still with us.
The only things I'd ban (on safety grounds) are f duct and 6 wheelers.
Active suspension is one of the things that would be awesome for both race and street cars... if it were developed more.
Most street cars produced nowadays have active suspension tho
A huge innovation that I was certain that was going to go missing was the CVT, the deal of having infinite gears in an F1 car is just bonkers
Can't wait for 2022, I hope we see something really creative from 1 team that no other team has thought of
the most modern one I loved was sneaking oil into the combustion chambers in the age of maximum fuel flow requirements
My favorite was the "traction control" Red Bull had in 2013 that became known towards the end of the season. Instead of putting it on the engine, they put it on the KERS which let them use it out of corners more effectively.
Since the hybrid era was coming the following season and KERS was out, there were only 5ish races left in a season already out of hand, and that it didn't violate the TC rules, no team bothered to protest and chalked it up to fair ingenuity.
Since we have a budget cap now which restricts the richer treams from simply beating everyone with the size of their wallet, I think that the FIA should relax all bans and let the teams decide which past innovations they want to bring forward. An example could be RB deciding to maximize the blown diffuser, maybe Merc decides to prioritze the F duct or the Double DRS, Renault invests in the damper etc
Racing used to be funded by cigarette money. And it was basically unlimited too
Hasn't stopped Red Bull's mortgage on the WDC and constructor's championships.
@@jordanwardle11 It was never unlimited. Not F1, anyway.
Would be cool to see an f1 car with all these technical innovations and how much faster it will be
Surely, once they learn how to police the salary cap effectively, they will be able to open up the regulations. Image a Formula 1 with open development, but everything becomes shared information at the end of the season so other teams can legitimately copy. It would force teams to constantly develop on a budget. The best brains not budgets would prevail and Adrian Newey would probably win another dozen world titles.
F1 is suppose to be the pinnacle of racing and innovation, last decade or so they limit that greatly and I think that is hurting the sport.
theres like what 4 engines, and they also all use the same tyres.
then you've got the same 4 teams dominating because they've got money
The Williams CVT I think was banned before entering a race.
I’ve long thought the extremely proscriptive rules and banning innovations is ridiculous. Shouldn’t the rules be infinitely simpler such as maximum fuel use and allow for development which would often benefit road cars?
F1 is a sport. It’s not about making the fastest car possible, but make the fastest cars within regulations that allow for good, safe and fair races.
The FIA makes those regulations to keep costs under control, have good raceability and make the cars as safe as possible.
They honestly do a great job. Many inovations are really bad for thr sport.
The FIA regulations are totally missing the point. From the publics view, it isn't the speed that is the problem, it is the lack of close, exciting racing! These regulations only focus on reducing speed instead of dealing with the issue of dirty air that makes close racing so challenging. Thankfully I think this is addressed for the 2022 season so hopefully we will see better racing next year.
Oh ….. that old statement. 😐Exciting racing next year.🥱
well now I'd really like to see an outlaw version of F1 to bring on more of the tapped engineering to light, and to bring on more epic upgrades without rubbish regulations and stuff
The 6 wheelers looks so cool. I love totally unique designs like that
I feel like F1 has calcified and the season is won or lost in the rule book. I think moveable aero should be allowed. Give the teams each a safety cell and specific amount of energy per race and see what they come up with!
Active suspension came at a time when the sport was great. It was space age for the era. Other innovations are lateral thinking in comparison, although each time an F-Duct or a DAS comes along I wish I had thought of it and wonder why nobody thought of it before.
If we can buy American luxury cars and SUVs with active suspension, it's a wonder it isn't found more often in Europe.
Now, I converted mine back to standard as electronic shocks with magnetic dampening we're horrendously expensive to replace, but they were pretty cool while they worked. (I took them off at the 220000 mile mark, so it's not like they didn't last, but $1600 in shocks on a $3k vehicle that's just kept for a spare didn't make sense).
Williams making a continuously variable transmission was a pretty good one, or I guess just Williams throughout the 80’s and early 90’s. They innovated so much but almost everything they did got banned.
What about the side skirts that could be raised lowered for ground effect?
Launch control?
Ferrari's secretive movable front wing?
Arrows A22 crazy front wing?
Honda secondary fuel tank?
Brake steer (like DAS) are the type of new tech I like because it puts more demand on the drivers and hence any differences in skills between drivers would be further amplified.
Now I want to see a car with active dampening, an active computerized f-duct system for multiple cornering scenarios, exhaust blowing, four wheel steering, and DAS. Now that would be a hell of a car lol, I’d love to see what no holds barred could look like.
How would that improve racing?
Haven't watched yet, here are my guesses:
Ground Effect/Fan Car
Double/Blown Diffusor
F-duct
X-wings
Active Suspesion
4-Wheel Steering
Double-Chassis Lotus
Tuned Mass Damper
No x wings, no lotus 88. But you got all the rest!
i love that engineers are giving it everything to create something that seems kind of illegal but actually isn't
9:25 man what an absolute beauty that car design is! When I think of an F1 car, THAT is what I picture!!
It is always great to see that the great minds of f1 would never stop improving the cars, no matter of the regulations and rules applied to limit them.
I remember seeing a video of the F-Duct, when Alonso was using it in Spain, and his team principal having no idea as to how he would steer the car if he operated it. It sounds pretty dangerous if he won't be able to steer
You don't have to steer on the straights. 👌
The’F-Duct’ is a thing of genius, some plumbing and look at the impact
I love that racing that isn't about racing but also innovation and engineering also tends to ban innovation.
Now if only we would know what happened to the Ferrari engines in 2019...
They were using the oil to burn as well as the fuel, making extra power, FIA subsequently found out about it and banned it...
And instantaneously they were nowhere
@@cschnauz It wasn't just that they were directly burning it which would be easy to see... but they were atomizing minute amounts into the intercoolers, lowering the intake temperatures (and burning less of the oil than the regulations were looking for) and gained a huge boost in power since cool intake air is denser. Or at least that is my interpretation of the things that I have read.
We're definitely going to see a few more added to this list in 2022. Such a huge change in the aerodynamic rules gives quite a lot of lee-way.
But the rules are very restrictive, so the F1 engineers have to pull out all stops to exploit loopholes
@@captainace1277 They're open compared to what they used to be. More restrictive around the front and rear wings, but the Venturi tunnels, diffuser, underbody, engine cover, side pods and suspension are much more open to invention.
@@tdyerwestfield True, I'm actually very excited with what they do with the floor since ground effect is being brought back next year
The Coanda exhaust's my favourite...
Because that was the anagram I unscrambled to win a set of Enstone Monaco race posters from Lotus
Could you imagine what benefit this years cars would have with a mass damper type arrangement, with the way they’re bobbing up and down at high speed.
i would say that if they had allowed the active suspension all road cars would have it as standard now. making road cars safer and faster.
also the cvt gearbox would have been a good adition.
cvts are a thing in road cars, and they are absolute dogshit
@@gamm8939 if they had developed it from 1993 in F1, and they really have the potential I think they would have they would have been common now
I'm sure a team is working on a concept right now that'll be controversial about the 2022 cars. really excited to see which team makes a splash when winter testing happens!
I loved the mass damper and was going to try it on my drag boat but health issues stopped me from racing anymore. So I never got to try it. I do believe it would have helped me get on plane faster. How much faster I will never know.
I was also intrigued with the Renault forward exhaust that created an exhaust gas side skirt on the R31.
i like the tuned mass damper. just a purely mechanical solution. so elegant in its simplicity. shouldn't have banned it but idk if they would still be using it now after going for the larger rims.
6 wheeled race cars and road cars honestly sounds like a great idea to help mitigate issues with losing traction. Can’t crash if your car is firmly planted on the road
Head on collisions, not looking where they are going, intersections, drunk driving etc all that is what causes most accidents not oversteer or understeer.
The smaller front section reduced drag and turbulence from the tires which is what the main benefits were not traction.
DAS was amazing... The tuned mass damper also good.
Shame things get banned simply because other teams can't make it work for them (hey ferrari)
Get real. The racing would be awful! One team would develop the best solution and would walk the championship.
You need to watch the engineering robot challenges. F1 is not for you.
The flexible fuel hose to the engine by Ferrari a couple of seasons ago is my favorite i think
If there is one thing I would like to see back is the Blown Difuser! That sounded AMAZING
Aren't CVTs also one of the banned F1 concepts? I think it should've been at least worth a mention
Always wondered if these would just be the norm now if they hadn't been banned. Always felt it was just the next evolution in gearing after the introduction of sequencial shifting.
CVT would have killed motorsport
@@procatprocat9647 why
I wonder what the first clever trick of the new rules will be. Someone will come up with something they’re not supposed to
2:05 That Casio digital watch glued to the steering wheel 🤣🤣... BANNED!
They should've re-allowed the tuned mass damper before the introduction of the current ground effect cars; or even now; probably would help teams work around the porpoising while giving them more setup freedom
Honestly, given the history of competitiveness in the past years, Id love to see a regulation framework that allows badly performing teams a tad bit more freedom to innovate their way up
Won't happen
You'd just get ferrari rb and merc ripping the guys out of the fia until the decision is reversed
The more inovations you allow, the better teams with the most mean, experience and ingeneers to take advantage of them are going to do. It’s the Adrian Neweys and such that would benefit, not the teams at Haas or Williams and you would have an even bigger gap.
William's CVT transmission that never raced could have changed the course of road cars today. Everything would have a CVT if the FIA would have let them develop that technology. The efficiency would be second to none, it would have been amazing.
CVTs are utter garbage in cars nowadays but I see what you're saying.
A CVT probably couldn't ever last race distance though
Pretty sure they said it wouldn’t work as the engines would be at max revs for basically the whole race, which would put the engines and the cvt belt under a lot more stress
@@iestynellis3797 if anyone could prove the benefits of the concept for certain though it would have been F1 and it's a shame they weren't allowed to do it.
@@iestynellis3797 Is this still f1 we're talking about? the racing series that pushes technology well past its prior limits and redefines what is possible with a piece of tech?
I was always impressed by Red Bulls Faux Traction control, where the input for intentional misfiring was determined by the load on the suspension. Low load meant the car might be hitting a bump, so it would kill ignition., high load meant they had good grip and they would run as normal, often alternating many times per second to maximize power delivered to the tires.
I would love to see an Iron Chef style racing series like they pick a random power train or chassis style or something and then every team has to build and design their tech around it with budget/size restrictions etc, they could pick a new one every season and always keep it fresh.
Imagine the car that could be produced with all these innovations. I wonder fast they would be.
Active aero, blown and double diffuser I am thinking...
So, basically the RedBull X2010 but with active suspension?
@@freakysquirrel7218 yeah I suppose, didn't that have a fan as well.
@@solidoperative Yep, it did. A RUclipsr
(Jimmy Broadbent) managed a 3:16:00 around the Nordschleife with that thing in Assetto Corsa.
Irl you would go unconscious from the G-forces xd
@@freakysquirrel7218 Even with a G-Suit?
@@solidoperative That car would easily hit 15+ G in some corners since you can take the final corner at Monza nearly full throttle in that thing. Considering a rocket launch is 11 Gs of force, maybe they could, not 100% sure though*
Some of these things are outlawed with good reasons. Then, there are things like the Mass Damper, which is a brilliant system with no good reason for being banned. That should've stayed in F1.
Interesting video & excellent narration.
Add 1 sub
I really hope that with the budget cap the rules will get a bit less restrictive. Mass dampers and active suspension would work great with the emphasis on using more ground effect. And instead of having super complicated rules regarding cooling and exhaust it would be easier to just limit the flow rate and let the engineers go crazy about where to put in and outlets. Maybe also allow active aero so there's no more bickering about which wing can flex how much
imagine banning das and tuned mass damper: no safety concerns, everyone could afford them and they improved performance
Well we don't know if "everyone" could actually afford das, and I think that allowing it would've certainly make an impact on the planned cost caps
@@juanin200 Perhaps it could be standardised by the fia, even tho it requires extra money on their part