SENNA - Exclusive Clip ('90 Japanese Grand Prix)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 июл 2011
- Exclusive clip from SENNA, opening in the US beginning August 12. Ayrton Senna wins the 1990 Japanese Grand Prix and secures the championship - but not the way he wants.
Развлечения
"Unfortunately we touched in the first corner and both went off"
I see detective Aryton is on the case
lol
Weeks later: “Fortunately it went wrong for him”
I'm here for that Japanese announcer going berserk lol.
Murray Walker "This is amazing"
Mixing the different language in commentating is brilliant editing. And Senna definetly meant that.
I like how they both casually walk away from their cars as if nothing happened.
I never imagined that the greatest moment of all F1 times would be a hit. This is only possible with legends. It looks like a movie.
Senna falou para o Berger ... "ano passado ganhei na pista e me roubaram, este ano vão ser minhas regras, vocês vão ver".
After 89 this felt really good. And still does, every time.
You sick. Senna was wreckless. It was life and death in those days.
Prost was a good driver but such a little bitch in personality.
Well said. That people, ignorant posers, always use 1990 to exemplify Senna as a "dirty" driver but overlook what had happened during 89 when Prost did exactly that to deny him of a chance of the championship. Not to say Senna was always clean but using 1990 to make such a claim overlooks context. That it really makes me wonder where people are getting this selective history from.
@@styleemusic ruclips.net/video/75_hIBU_Zmg/видео.html
#payback
1:18 senna waited for Prost to catch up...wonder what this conversation sounded like
I believe Prost just walked past him. They were heading the same direction, so Senna probably thought that Prost was coming ti confront him
Muitas pessoas criticam o Senna por essa atitude, mas ao meu ver Senna fez isso como quem realmente não aceita a injustiça. Resumindo fez o que fez pra mostrar que remédio pra doido é doido e meio.
E quando verstappen o faz ele e um vagabundo, hipocrisia!
Brazilian taxi driver
"It's not a bad feeling at all, is it?"
@Abu Dabu He was on his rights. Balestre itself covered Prost 1 year before when he crashed intentionaly into Senna.
Somebody once That doesn’t excuse Senna from doing such an act in the first place. Two wrongs don’t make a right.
@@TrickyMario7654 Wich one? In 1990, yes. he was totaly wrong, but somehow he got out of it.
@Abu Dabu It wasn't an ilegal track re-entry. The area was just in front of it, it is supposed to be used if you miss the corner, blame him for using an area with the purpose he used is conplete bs.
@Abu Dabu The area was there to be used the way he used it. This was a false charge by Balestre. Years later this case had another review, they accepted that this wasn't a penalty at all.
He said it, he did it. At list he warn everyone before the race took place 😂
I'll never forget watching this race on TV back in 1990. I was in 8th grade. At the time, Ayrton Senna was not yet the legend he is today but he was always my favorite. I remember him always getting pole position and always winning all the races. I will be honest, back then, not much action happened during most of the races because Senna would just lead the entire race and rarely anybody passing. Today's F1 is designed to make more it exciting with DRS. RIP to the greatest, Senna.
Yet Senna did not win so many races and he had a lot of collisions and crashes, I remember the many times he was overtaken especially by the best driver of the time who not only overtook Senna but also many other world champions from Lauda to Damon Hill.
Finally someone with a high IQ that doesnt think old is always the best
Schumacher was the Greatest! He changed everything! So Intelligent! So Fast ! So Fit! He brought x millions people to this Sport. And beated Senna when he was a Youngstar... The King of the Sport! There will never be anyone like him again.
#keepfightingmichael #ripsenna
yeah sure
Thank You for telling the truth that Senna wasn't the legend back then that he is today. Everyone thinks that he was the second coming of christ back then like he is today
Oh! Mesmo quando era o cara mau ele era bom demais!! Eu vi isto acontecer, obrigada Ayrton ! Por tudo!!
Prost and Senna were so much equal... They couldn't stop the battle on the track.
Fucking legend.
*(**0:20**)* _Crash II: o dia do troco!_
I love the smell of justice in the morning.
Smells like...victory!
Senna waiting the Prost for figth.
Senna esperando o Prost para a briga kkkk
1:24
*WHEEEEEZZZE*
This man was so passionate about what he loved, amazing!
Oh, so amazing, he crashed on purpose to become a world champion, and didn't even try to cover it. Great.
Christ! Even when he purposely crashes someone out for thr championship, it’s because of passion! Yes, cause no move from Senna could ever be dirty, no no. Not even when he cheats and doesn’t try to cover it. This is why i hate how people treat Senna.
@Luiz Gustavo Robbed? You say Senna was robbed? Let me tell you: if every result have counted in the championship, like nowadays, Prost would've become world champion in 1988 instead of Senna, and in 1989 even before the Japanese Grand Prix.
So who was robbed again?
While Senna was super quick in one lap, his car paid dearly for his overly agressive driving style, that's why he had more mechanical failures than his teammate at McLaren. Of course, McLaren and Honda could've improved reliability, but seeing other teams and Senna's very own teammate, it wasn't necessary, it wasn't worth the money.
Prost on the other hand, was both very quick and quite gentle with the car. He finished in better positions more often than the regularly DNF-ing Senna, so here's my question: shouldn't the driver with more points take the crown? Shouldn't the first placed get more points than the second?
Of course they should. And you know it too, as the points system was changed in the mid-90s exactly because of this reason.
Well, Balestre openly admitted that he helped his beloved baguette friend to be champion in 89, and in that race, Prost crashed into Senna on purpose. 1990 was pure revenge, he was pissed.
@@Petidani0330 You forgot that Senna also had the superior engines from Honda.
"Senna has been hit!" That's um, generous commentary from Bob Varsha. 😂
non fu cosa di cui andar fieri, Senna lo ammise anni più tardi. Non si può mai essere orgogliosi di vincere in questo modo.
Alain proist que não deveria se orgulhar do roubo de 1989
Senna was playing Burnout 3 Takedown before it was invented. Mad respekt
Ayrton Senna the greatest driver that F1 had and will have!
The music is this scene is utterly amazing
senna gives prost a stare right after he gets out of the car like "you know why this happened."
Kelvin Chan Prost stared at him the same way at Imola in 94 then.
@@anthonyiuculano6002 Senna, the best of all time, take this "karma speak" and put right in your ass!
@@Alan_J_Silva
Senna the worst of all time could not take the competition and crashed rather than race.
sabe o que foi mais gostoso? foi ouvir o galvão dizer: Senna dá as costas para prost!! pqp foi delicioso ouvir aquilo,foi uma vingança deliciosa por 89
1:20 wish i could see them talk to each other
It was his revenge for being robbed of the title the previous year.
Senna was never robbed of anything.
lol the disqualification was a joke Jean-Marie Balestre robbed Senna the Titel and gave it to his Friend Alain
Santa tralala.
The disqualification was not by Balestre, it was by the track officials and Senna lost the title all by himself, the result at Suzuka made no difference.
Guess what? Prost was 21 points ahead before Suzuka and being put out of the race by Senna when Prost was leading denied Prost another win. Even with Prost out of the race and if Senna had got away with it, Prost would still have been world champion.
In Austria gp was raining, Senna won the points in Japan and took out of it. Prost did not know how to drive in the rain, so much so that he ran away from mclaren because senna was better :)
Austria? It did rain in Australia and Senna crashed, in fact Prost was right about that.
Senna scored no points at Suzuka but Prost was too far ahead on points for that to make any difference.
For a driver who did not know how to drive in the rain Prost did rather well, his first win in F 1 it rained a lot , and Spain 1991 when Senna and Schumacher both spun, Prost didn't and he came second in the not very good Ferrari, only behind Mansell in the faster and better Williams. It was very wet when Prost overtook Senna at San Marino in 1993.
Prost did not run away he had already decided to leave McLaren for the same reason de Angelis left Lotus in 1985. Prost scored more points than Senna in 1988 and 1989, that does not make Senna better at all.
The beast of the beast
My favourite movie !!!
0:44 " Senna has been hit "......ahahahahaha
What a fucking lie. Senna HIT him because he couldn't stand that Prost was able to keep up and (holy shit!) beat him once in a while.
@@largol33t1 Like what Prost did the year before? Senna was just having revenge
@@tomlogan9973 Retaliation at 300 kph? They almost killed themselves
largol33t1 shut up u idiot that was a revenge for the stolen title of 1989. Senna is a legend Prost is a pussy
Nuno P don t forget your father is a pussy too
I miss these races. F1 hasn't been the same sense the early 90s
F1 hasn't been the same since Ayrton's passing.
Justiça foi feita o troco de 89 no francês mimado.....boa Senna Brasil acima de tudo abaixo de Deus 🙏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼🇧🇷
Senna waiting for Prost... 🥰 LOVE THEM !
senna: but trow off prost in a slower corner???
like it or not, this is the most dangerous move done in porpouse in f1 history
Dóis gigantes da história da fórmula 1
Senna ❤️ troco merecido
Before the start, Mansell and Berger (behind Prost & Senna) are sitting there thinking _"It's working!.. it's working!"_
Abu Dhabi 2021
Revenge from ‘89.
Would never of happened if Senna was given the correct side to start with.
all pole sitters at Suzuka would start on that side until even after that year's GP, so that's bs...
No they did not. The pole position was changed to the correct side for the following year's race and has been there even since.,
Bentwito.
Pole position was the same side each year until 1991, Senna was on the correct side in 1990 and he deliberately crashed because he was too cowardly to race.
I agree fannyboy. Senna did with style compared with Prost's lame effort in 1989. On 4 occasions pole position was on the left at Suzuka 25 times on the right. Don't remember Prost wanting it switched back to the 'correct side' for the 1993 race.
Bentwito.
Only a complete moron would call it style to deliberately ram another car at high speed, the worst most disgusting thing I have ever seen in F 1. At least when Prost took his line the previous year it was at relatively low speed and since Senna came from too far back on a bad line and collided with Prost, it had nothing to do with the cowardly move by senna in 1990.
Pole postion was the same side for 4 years, it was only changed in 1991 and Prost was not against it being changed. Maybe ignorant Senna fanboys have to keep on trying to make excuses for Senna but the truth is what it is.
At 1:23, Senna is standing there waiting as Prost comes towards him. The camera cuts away. I wonder if they exchanged words. Is there any video that shows this encounter?
Electone_Guy i have the same question man
Prost walked past Senna and refrained from knocking him to the ground.
Had it been modern day Prost would have remained in his car phoning Balestre on his mobile phone.
Bentwito.
Senna should have been kicked out of F1 altogether, no other driver has ever deliberatley driven into another car at high speed in such a dangerous way, What was Balestre thinking he let Senna get away with it?
Senna was lucky Prost did not hit him, Senna would have landed on his backside and been out for the count.
You mean similar to the Piquet/Salazar incident. Piquet punching a man with a helmet on. Not advisable fannyboy.
Foi roubado em 89 e deu o troco em 90, SENNA é orgulho mundial.
Exatamente, troco dos trocos !!!
Let's say Prost robbed Senna's title in 89 by turning sharp in a 80km/h corner where Senna dive bombed from really far, and Senna robbed the next championship by crashing in a 220km/h corner, on purpose. Both got unfair, but one of them is definitely crazier :-)
Nico 9138 According to Honda's telemetry Senna was still on full throtte while in the gravel trap!!!
But they are same. They both became first when they didn't deserve. It only changed who won the title first.
@@pineappleracing6547
Senna did not deserve 1988, he certainly did not deserve 1989 and he did not deserve 1990. Since the points system and Honda gave Senna 1988 that is fine.
Since Prost won 1989 and was even further ahead on points that is fine but 1990 was the most stupid victory and very undeserved. Any other driver would have been kicked out of F 1 for that.
Brazilian taxi driver
The amount of people justifying Senna turning his car into a weapon to put his and Prosts life at risk is quite frankly laughable.
It's hilarious how they attack Schumacher for taking out other drivers on purpose, yet defend Senna for doing the same ugly actions!
I don't understand how Prost is so cool as he gets out of the car right next to Senna.
Because he knew what he did one year before
Maybe he was shaken up
A small baguette, aye? We don't see that every day, lol..
Prost once said to the interviewer that he thought he was gonna punch Senna, but soon resisted. He is cool.
@@thinkernote4635 In Senna (2010) you can watch his interview. He didn't punched him because he was disgusted, not because he was cool.
i Vill always ❤ you
🎉
Here after Silverstone 2021
Same.
Lembro-me bem, era madrugada em Portugal, eu e meu saudoso Pai ficámos sem ir dormir para vermos esta corrida e tudo terminou em poucos segundos.
Independentemente do que se tinha anteriormente passado no ano anterior, eu sendo fã do Senna não apreciei que tivesse vencido assim.
Acho que foi para o Prost sentir o gosto desportivo que o Senna sentiu em 89...
He didn't want to do it, but the way the system treated him the previous year... they had it coming
The system treated him no different than it would have any other driver.
Bad editing. How they don’t have Murray Walkers “AND ITS HAPPENED IMMEDIATELY!!!” As they crash is beyond frustrating. It’s his most iconic commentary moment in my opinion.
They should have put the part where the brazilian comentator (Galvão Bueno) says "SENNA DA AS COSTAS PARA PROST!" , it means "SENNA TURNS HIS BACK ON PROST!"
THIS IS AMAZING!! SENNA GOES OFF IN THE FIRST CORNER!
Some say Max is taking notes and practicing on the sim as we speak.
He should be
Crazy guy
Justice for Senna
The Best Senna!!!
Ayrton Number One
@Audioquest56 did you find it?
look up "senna soundtrack" til you find it
what's the music ?
Eu assisti foi bom de ver perigoso mais deu o troco
O Senna não quis nem saber mano, arregaçou o carro do Prost sem dó nem piedade... deu o troco mesmo.
Best ever, and that too by a distance
If they would have done that in1997 prost would have been granted the championship
I watched this movie with no knowledge of either of these crashes, and I was totally prepared to see prost and senna go at it after they both got out of their crashed cars, I was actually impressed, despite their obvious hatred for each other and heightened egos (that all F1 drivers have), that they were mature enough to just walk away and attempt to solve their another day.
Великий!!!👊👊👊
Senna hit the walls and died at 210km/h, and this crash was happen at 240km/h.
I respect Prost's self control.
Different circumstances and situation. Senna went off after hitting Prost (he hit him, he later admitted it) into the gravel trap and went into a tyre wall. At Imola Senna was going flat out and went straight on into a concrete wall at high speed. The tyre wall is designed to soften the impact and absorb the energy, the concrete wall destroyed the car, sending a tyre at his head and a piece of the suspension arm through his helmet. Both the skull fracture and any of the objects that hit him killed him instantly
@@princeendymion9044
You totally missed my point. Senna had no control the consequences of his attack even he thought "I hit the right side of the Ferrari and prost would be okay." Damon Hill criticized Senna because It was unknown what was gonna happen next at that corner after that revenge. It's dangerous. Luckily Nothing serious happened to anybody and people took it "history" just because it was 1990, not after 1994.
Legendary
GRANDE SENNA,..... EL MEJOR DE LA HISTORIA.
And people still lose their minds about Michael stopping at Monaco Quali...You have to be a selfish, merciless success-fanatic to become one of the eternal greats...Same for Lewis, Lauda etc.
Lauda himself said it: "You win Formula 1 by being a bastard."
At this point you're aware that it was a revenge for what happened to Senna in 89, right? He patiently waited 1 long year until he could payback Prost/Balestre for 1989. Man, I celebrated this moment screaming like a horn.
Esa fue la mejor respuesta al maldito de jean Marie balestre y una demostración en contra de su voluntad, por qué estoy seguro que airton senna nunca ubiese querido romper un coche...
0:30 tababababababababa tababababababa
On the other hand, no one is perfect.
Prost esperou o contato... o contato veio!
it's not a bad feeling at all is it ;)
Il a reconnu quelques annees plus tard qu il avait volontairement envoyer prost dans le décor.
Segundo John Bisignano, locutor, Senna não estava bem consigo próprio depois de colidir com Prost. Creio que seria diferente se tivesse ganho na pista sem a colisão na largada.
Can somebody explain me the 'wrong pole position side' thing? If you watch suzuka 1989 and suzuka 1988 the pole position is always on the right side of the track, as in this 1990 race.
It’s something the documentary claims, but it isn’t true.
It's a myth made up by a documentary called "Senna" to paint a Prost = villain and Senna = good guy narrative, but there's no evidence for that. The pole has always been on that side and nobody cared until 1990. It's also not uncommon for the pole to be on the dirty side. It was changed in 1991 to prevent similar events. Love him or hate him, 1990 was 100% intentional and Sennas fault.
@@Edelweiss1102 well in 1989 and in 1990, Prost overtook Senna in the first corner with way more grip and with a lot of room. Stating that it was always on that side doesn't change the fact it is unfair to punish a pole winner. Both 89,90 starts prove Senna's point.
What I do not understand is that the FIA went over the top in 1989 and banned Senna for 'cutting the chicane' at Suzuka and issued a large fine and temporary suspension of his FIA Super License , yet he intentionally takes Prost off in 1990 and doesn't seem to get any penalty at all.
The disqualification was by the track officials, the ban and fine were for dangerous driving 4
collisions in one year may help to account for that. Senna getting away with the deliberate and dangerous collision in 1990 made no sense.
@@barrierodliffe4155 Ah ok. Can you recall what the 'dangerous driving 4
collisions in one year' were. Portugal 1988 with Prost on the pit straight, Brazil 1989 with Berger at the start, Portugal 1989 with Mansell in Turn One, Japan 1989 with Prost maybe? There were a lot of politics in F1 at the time especially with JM Balestre in charge of the FIA. I thought as he was still head of the FIA in 1990 he would of definitely DQ'd Senna for the collision at Suzuka that year as well.
@@dazcouz
The 4 collisions in 1989 include Brazil, Portugal, Japan and Australia, Japan was not a dangerous collision but collectively Senna had a lot of collisions or incidents which was why he was found guilty of dangerous driving. He was disqualified by the track officials and only later given the fine and ban.
What I do not understand is why after having had a penalty for dangerous driving he got away with the potentially very dangerous collision in 1990, Balestre could not disqualify Senna and since Senna was out of the race that would be meaningless but Senna could have been fined and his suspended ban reinstated which I would have expected if any other driver had done that.
@felipesilveirapoker Valid points..but with little reference to the one I am making. My point is that he put both of them in danger deliberately. Driving fast in the wet with the risk of crashing is all very well, but to deliberately cause an accident, that's a different matter. Plus, I am making a comparison to the crashes of '89 and '90. Yes they put themselves in danger as part of the job, but they don't crash into each other at a fast corner as part of the job as well. It was stupid.
If the collision did not happen, as well as the two continuing onward, two, or possibly a few outcomes might happen.
1:Both drivers finish, with Senna finishing ahead of Prost and keeping his championship lead (which may be reduced) going into Adelaide. And had Senna not retire with gearbox issues whilst in the lead, he would have won the race and the championship without any controversy.
2: Prost finishes ahead of Senna, possibly winning while Senna could DNF or finish in a non points position. Both drivers would be level on points as a result. Then in Adelaide, Senna would have gearbox problems and Prost finishes P3, but Prost loses out on the title due to the best 11 races rule.
Hopefully I am not mistaken about anything in this theory
There are several possibilities, 1 Prost wins at Suzuka and not being taken out of the race is in a better state at Adelaide so he tries harder, finishing 1st or 2nd and even having to drop points he would then be ahead of Senna. 2 . Senna somehow manages to keep up with Prost and overtake him which is not too likely, Senna would then win the title regardless of adelaide but since Senna was too cowardly to race at Suzuka we will never know.
@@barrierodliffe4155 You forgot another: If Senna also did not have gearbox issues in Adelaide, then he also would have won the 1990 title
@M1ggins the fact that it was the first time you see that doesn't mean it was the first time that this kind of things happened (ex: jones vs piquet montral 80).
as i said, prost did it in pourpouse, but wasn't disgusting at all, he was well in front of senna, and formarly he still would decide the fucking line he want to do, even cut a little the chicane. what happened after with balestre is the reason why everyone blame so bad prost, but the incident itself wasn't so clearly unfair
I have always wondered 2 things, one is when the green light came on did Senna purposely prolong his start, just so he could be along side Prost at the first corner? Also when they were walking back, why did Senna stop, was he planning on saying something to Prost?
Senna is a legend
Because he died and they made a silly movie about him.
What people don't understand about brasilian people and about why Senna is such an idol in Brasil is that people are not friendly as many believe. Brasilian people are forged in a very deep cut-throat mentality: precisely what Senna stood for. Prost and Senna are great competitors, but where they differ is to what limits they were willing to push their ethics. To brasilian people ethics are sometimes something to overcome in order to succeed, whereas, I believe, in other cultures a win without ethics is not successful. Senna had 89 to justify his actions, and that was good enough for him. Another day, another win.
I agree, except I wouldnt say OVERCOME ethics, its more of an act of DEFYING ethics.
Pretty much how many things were considered unethical in the past but changed, such as divorce, blood transfusion, and so on and so forth.
Senna turned the system against itself, playing by the rules made him lose, he plucked the rules as Cap. John Luke Picard would say.
The fact that Schumacher got kicked out of the championship for less is truly disgusting.
I agree with you, though I think the FIA DSQ’d Schumacher from the 1997 season because they didn’t want to see anymore championships decided by collisions.
@@TrickyMario7654
Only one championship had been decided by a collision before, and that was 1990.
1994 Hill made a mistake, he should have waited for a better opportunity to overtake.
@@TrickyMario7654 Yep. As Schumacher said himself both Prost and Senna had gotten away with it.
@@barrierodliffe4155 ' Hill made a mistake ' Only with the benefit of hindsight. He wasn't to know the Benetton was damaged.
He didn't whine or complain about the pole being on that side of the track the previous 2 years.
SLMdirtfan when everything goes fine you usually dont complain
CU7
1989 did not go fine for Senna, he was disqualified for cheating.
@@barrierodliffe4155 how was he cheating?
It is not exactly in the rules to drive into another car, nor is getting an illegal push start or taking a short cut, the fact remains Senna was disqualified not that it made any difference to the title, Prost was 21 points ahead before Suzuka.
@@barrierodliffe4155 so the fact that senna missed the chicane and got disqualified tells me two things, either balestre peanilised senna to help prost out or that the stewards actually payed attention to a race for once. Drivers missed chicanes all the time before this race and never got peanilised for it. But when senna takes the escape road its a disqualification. So the marshalls and the FIA were being inconsistant, just as they are today. And the whole Senna caused the crash thing is just bs, in my opinion the crash was caused by both of them, senna for a divebomb rather than waiting a few more laps and by that time he could have made a clean overtake and prost turned in so early he would have cut across the grass partialy if senna wasnt there. So i dont think it is 100% prosts fault or 100% sennas fault, they both caused that crash yet senna got punished for missing a chicane.
Sweet revenge!!! Hahahhaa
And Prost was champion in 1993 with the Williams. Senna wasn't in 1994. Big fun!
He could've killed Prost. You senna fanboys would condone murder if Senna did it
Amazing Senna!
Bhaaaa!!!!
🙏🙏🙏😄😄
Alain expected Ayrton to disappear magically...
dopo questo gesto, persi tutta la fiducia che avevo in lui, in più nn fu sanzionato per qst atto a dir poco vile
1:45 - „How do you feel about being world champion?“
Ayrton Senna: „ it‘s not a bad feeling at all, isn‘t it?“
….but his eyes say something else…
@M1ggins in fact i don't say that i was a senna fan. just if i have to choose between the 2 i prefered senna to prost. they were the 2 better driver by a mile, by the way.
prost did a different thing than senna bullyng moves, for one time he did refuse to let pass him under his ultra-aggressive overtakes. senna was a master to the to-the-limit moves, when the others had give up or shunt with him. how many incident of this type have done prost in his career? how many ayrton?
VERSTAPPEN - exclusive clip ('21 Abu Dhabi grand prix)
O Prost tomou do próprio veneno.
I went to my first F1 race in 1978 to watch Fittipaldi, so dont try to school me
@M1ggins for example in the original english comment of that gp you can hear james hunt blaming senna for the crush, i remember watching the race with friends and parents, and livetime was hard to decide who's main fault.
yes, watching col-minded the replay dozen of times, was clear the fact that prost, more than provoke a shunt for pourpose, was'nt given up at the usual senna extreme manovrue. and, maybe isn't a point, but tell me if senna can do the corner arriving so fast and so inside...hmmm
At this point you're aware that it was a revenge for what happened to Senna in 89, right? He patiently waited 1 long year until he could payback Prost/Balestre for 1989.
@@keithrichards4296 sure. But let's forget all the time, in the previous 2 years at mecca, that prost had to lift to avoid a crash when Honda and Dennis Golden boy made the usual "get out of the way or shunt" move.... Or when Senna pushed Prost against the pit board (estoril 88)....
As everybody hates prost for suzuka, I dare you to find another reckless, dangerous or dirty move by the professor..... If I start that about Senna, I can write a book.... Like Schumacher
@@pisomark That's what I love the most about Prost's career, it was just beautiful to watch him to drive so fast and precise, in a so clean/smooth manner, doing absolute no mistakes. A true professor indeed. I'm a huge fan of him. I understand he was totally pissed with all the situation inside the team, but I don't know if it justifies his move - it open a new level of 'dirtiness' IMO (mostly for someone that had never made something like that). I had never seen in history someone to 'assure' his championship by ferociously throwing his car into his opponent car. And, differently you say about 'everybody' hating Prost, I can only see people supporting him, and blaming Senna for the incident.
@@keithrichards4296 in the top of mi mind, I recall Alan Jones doing the same at the start of Canadian gp with piquet (1980), but if you find enough you will find other examples, if not in F1 for sure in motorsports in general.... Notice also that prost did that at 50km/h, when other examples are not so safe... I'm convinced that if that situation occurred in a faster corner, prost had let Senna go.....
Another fun fact about Alain which was described as a "politic" driver... He had a lot of veeeery good teammates, and he did not devoted anybody to drive for the team, like somebody else, and he kicked the ass of people like Watson, arnoux, Cheever, lauda, risberg, Johansson, ma sell, alesi, hill.... He won 4 titles with a world champion teammate... Instead of berger, Irvine or barrichello
@@pisomark Very true. I failed to recall the Canadian GP of 1980. Not as 'savage', but an unfair move by Jones indeed. Everything lives now on the 'territory of infamy'. It was a gift to me testifying this era.
Revenge is a dish best served cold
Very cold
If you know what revenge is for. In this case it was not revenge just Senna being too cowardly to race.
Senna meant that...no doubt
It was deliberate and very dangerous, Senna did that because he was afraid to race against Prost who was faster at Suzuka. I know Senna qualified on pole but Prost rather fast in races there.