I own this piano and it's my first piano (I'm a beginner). I love it very much, it sounds great; I love learning and playing on it (practise one hour a day). Also the bluetooth midi connections never failed me (for who wants to know 🙂)
Congrats on your Roland RP107! It is a fantastic all-around piano with a great tone, touch, and speaker system. I am glad to hear that you have had success with it and its Bluetooth MIDI connection. Thanks for tuning in and happy playing! :)
I short update after playing this piano for almost a year now. I still love it and practise 3 to 5 times a week. I am still a beginner but I do notice that I am starting to long for a more fuller sound. I don’t how to describe it but it sounds al little like your inside a clothing closet. With headphones it’s a lot better. And rewatching this video: mine doesn’t sound as clear. Maybe it’s the wrong placement in the livingroom, I don’t know. I am looking for external speakers I can connect. This will probably help.
Thank you so much for sharing. Have you started noticing any decline in sound quality or action after playing it for over a year? I am planning on getting this piano in the next couple of weeks. I was debating between this or the Kawai kdp 120 because of the bigger speakers on it. However, after watching this, i am sticking with the Roland.
@@ExplanationNextHi! No I didn't notice any decline in sound quality after playig it for a longer time. I prefer playing with headphones it gives the best quality of sound. haven't bought any speakers yet.
I have never owned a Roland (or even played one at a store), but since subscribing to this channel, I have learned so much about Roland, and have become a big fan. Thanks Stu--you have convinced me to venture out to my local store so I can experience it first hand.
Thanks so much for tuning in! We're very happy to hear that our videos have inspired you to check out the Roland line. They make wonderful instruments! I am quite confident you will be thrilled with what they offer musically. :)
Thanks so much! That is quite the compliment and one that we appreciate immensely! The RP107 is quite versatile musically. Also, it makes for an excellent companion to any players studying classical repertoire as the action is one of the most authentic feeling at its price point. :)
Admittedly, I am a jazz musician, but I do have a classical background. Price really matters at entry level, but you still want a nice action and a decent tone that you won't grow out of too quickly. Accordingly I was impressed by the predecessor to this piano when I tried it at a showroom in Spain. Actually it was an F model, not an RP, but functionally, they are the same. It's great to get the incisive PHA4 action at this pricepoint. The Kawai home piano nearest to this price (in the same showroom) sounded tinny to me, and the action (not RH3 I think) was very light too. In fairness to Kawai, it may be that the hard floor surface favoured the Roland speakers, and a different surface might have favoured the Kawai. And maybe other players prefer the ever-so-light action, just not me. Unless the price has gone up a lot with the new models, I would not hesitate to recommend Roland RP/F pianos to first time buyers on a budget, though it's probably worth saving a few dollars and getting an F model, which will also occupy less space. The Yamaha YDP-164 was a great alternative, but its successor the 165 is a little too pricey IMO.
@@alfredoadice8331 That's a tough one. The RP107 action is better IMO, but the YDP-145 piano sound and speakers should be better. I think I'd prefer the YDP-145, but isn't it a bit more expensive? I tried the previous 144 & 164 models, and I can vouch for those. If you can get the YDP-165 (which has the GH3 action) that will be better for heavy practice. Better still, if you can find an old stock YDP-164, you can have virtually the same instrument (as the 165) and save money. It was priced the same as the 145, is now but the action was better IMO. Maybe the speakers too. Mercifully, Yamaha's GHS action (found on most Yamaha DPs with plastic actions) does seem to be getting better. Recently I purchased a P-121 for my motorhome and for light gigs and rehearsals. I'm satisfied with it. The action is just good enough for what I'm playing on it, which is mainly early jazz. I still prefer my old P-255 of course. It has the GH action. Don't dismiss Korg and Casio home pianos in this price range.
I have this piano, it's amazing. Agree with Stu regarding the speaker box design. It feels very big compared to the specs. And the first time I used a good pair of headphones on mine, I was blown away. Couldn't make out weather the sound was coming from the headphones or the speakers. I'm in love with this piano. Add a smartphone or an ipad, it gives you the full power. If your considering buying this, go for it. It's amazing. And the supernatural piano is wow!!! You have string resonance. You have dissonance. Only thing I didn't like, the keys are a bit noisy. But it's an issue with the PHA4 action and is present in all devices using that action. Overall it's an amazing piano.
RP107 is my first and current piano.. i have learned a lot in the past year on this piano. However i am ready to move on to an acoustic piano. Which is probable a good thing! The Roland kept me happy, i practiced every day, and have earned an upgrade, in my opinion. It is pretty entry level... Good to hear the PHA4 action is decent. Was worried it wouldn't be good enough for a beginner.
The RP107 is an excellent instrument to begin your journey on. The combination of the PHA4 action and SuperNATURAL tone engine offers a rewarding and authentic musical experience. It is great to hear that it served you well in the first phase of your piano journey. Thanks for tuning in and happy playing! :)
I owned a Roland RP401R (PHA-4 action and SuperNatural piano tone generator) for about a year before I sold it. I have also owned a couple of Yamaha Arius YDP 14# (GHS action) and 16# (GH3 action) models. Apparently, Roland has 4 trim levels of RP models: RP102, RP107, RP501R, and RP701. If this is correct, then I must have owned the second highest RP model, which included 72 rhythms (drums and bass). The current model to the piano I had is the RP501R. So, that trim level has a basic arranger, but not as full as the FP-E50, which includes other instruments in the accompaniment (other than drums and bass). I actually opened it several times to do tests with the speakers. If you remove the top lid, the sound is more open and full because the speakers are not contained in dedicated speaker boxes, so the back of the speaker is facing down and exposed. Then the speakers start to act like a grand piano soundboard, firing downward and upward without any baffle containing the sound. I think if you are playing at home with other people (bass player, guitar, drums, etc), removing the top lid will give you a fuller sound, but I don't recommend doing it, so you don't void the warranty.
Good call! I suppose for players that have an instrument out of warranty, it is a nice little trick to get a bit more out of the piano sonically. Thanks for sharing the tip! :)
@@kronoshayalet3322 I think the RP501R is a bit richer in features (for example, auto-accompaniment and more sounds, a little more amplifier power), but you might not need them. It seems to me they are pretty close in terms of piano performance. The RP107 is likely to be about the same than the RP501R for $300 less (at least here in the US). I believe I have played these late-model Roland pianos in the store, but I didn't pay much attention to the details of the sound. Maybe in person you might find more significant differences.
Hi, I'm a beginner but looking for a great piano to start practice with! Now I'm stuck between the rp107 and fp30x. I'm confused which one should I get. I'm looking for a better sound, touch, and actions. I don't really mind the price difference and the portability. Could you please tell me which one is better and I should buy :) thanks
Hi! Brent here! The RP107 and FP30X have very similar profiles in a number of ways. They both have the same PHA4 action and SuperNATURAL tone engine. With that said, the RP107 has a 16W speaker system versus the FP30X's 11W speaker system. So, in that category, there is a slight edge for the RP107. :)
Thank you for the review! I've also seen your comparison of the Casio AP 710 and the Roland HP702. My son is just starting out with piano, and we plan to rent one for his first year before making a purchase (we're based in France). Even though I've played the piano for nearly three decades, I'm unfamiliar with digital pianos. Given the choice between the Roland RP107 and the Casio AP710, which would you recommend? Thank you very much 😊
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in! We're glad you liked the review video! At the end of the day, it comes down to the preferences of the player. The AP710 is a higher rated instrument and, in my opinion, it has a nicer speaker system and piano tone, but the touch is a little on the lighter side. The RP107 has a heavier touch with escapement. For classical piano study, I might lean a little in that direction, but, if piano sound is the main priority, I would give the edge to the AP710. :)
You're very welcome! Thank you for tuning in! The sound is certainly not as lush and full as a more sophisticated and higher power speaker system, but it is a meaningful step up from its predecessor (the RP102). :)
I’m having a hard time deciding between the RP107 and the Casio PX870, which are both the same price in USD. We have an upright Yamaha P22. This would be for my young daughter who has played piano for 4 years as a secondary practice instrument. Thoughts? Thank you for your wonderful videos!
Thanks for tuning in and supporting our channel! It really comes down to a matter of personal preference. For me, the RP107 has a bit more of an authentic playing experience due to its PHA4 action. It is a heavier touch than the PX870 and also features escapement and triple sensors. With that said, the PX870 has an awesome speaker system and really beautiful piano sound. If the main goal is to have an instrument for classical piano study, I would lean in the direction of the RP107 personally. :)
hey Stu You could Use the Usb For the audio output instead of the headphone and use the speakers once playing i think this model as the fp30x have audio interface built in
I have just sat down at an RP-107 and an RP-102. They sound very different. I found the bass end on the 107 internal speakers sounded exaggerated, but generally, I felt that this model deserves a slightly better action. So much has improved on the 107 that now the action seems left behind. I tried a YDP-165 & a 145 too. These sound more refined to me than the RP models, but the GHS action on the 145 is inferior even IMO to the RP models ' PHA4 action, which I am beginning to dislike anyway. The YDP-165 completely outclasses the others I mentioned, though so did the old YDP-164, which was superb value for money.
The RP107 is definitely a marked improvement from the RP102. While some may have been hoping for an updated action, the PHA4 action still stands up as a wonderful and reliable choice. In terms of the YDP165 outshining the other models, to some extent, that is to be expected given the price difference. Something like the F701 or RP701 from Roland would be a fairer comparison given their associated price points. :)
@@MerriamPianos Yes, you're right to correct me. I was a little concerned about mentioning the Yamaha YDP-165 in the same context as a Roland RP-107, since I didn't know the RP-107's price. I see now that it's around 900 euros, which is closer to the YDP-145 price than the 165 price. Since the 145 only has a GHS action, the RP-107 marginally wins on action. I say marginally because the PHA4 doesn't feel as good as I dimly recall the implementation on the FP-30X. But the YDP-145 main piano patch beats the RP-107, at least for my ears. You have to put up with some irritating limitations at entry level, so there's no point in buying extras like a fancier cabinet. I think that Roland's (very similar) F models are marginally better value for money than the RP models. The RP-701LA and the F-701LA should be very nice. Let's hope the PHA4 action has been implemented a little better than on the RP-701.
Thanks so much! The headphones Stu is using in this video are the Meze 99 Neo model. They are fantastic headphones! I believe they are Stu's current favourite. :)
Hello, I have a question. So I’ve been watching a lot of your reviews lately and I’ve seen so many good digital pianos. However, I was wondering if you could tell me what the best digital piano out there for $2000 and under is. I’m willing to spend that 2000 if it’s worth the buy, but I just don’t know which digital piano truly provides the best of the best when it comes to sound quality, key feel, ect. Up for any recommendations of any brands
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thank you for tuning into our channel! One of the reasons why you likely won't find any reviewer explicitly declaring the "best" piano at a given price point is that it is a very personal and subjective matter. Every piano manufacturer and model provides a a different touch and tone, which, depending on the preferences of the player, will resonate more or less from person to person. In my opinion, I think Kawai pianos offer the very best sound for under $2000. The KDP75 and KDP120 are excellent. If you can spring for the CN201, it would be well-worth the additional investment. In terms of touch, I tend to favour the Roland models as they're a little bit heavier and more robust in this particular price category. Options like the RP107 or F701 would be models worth exploring. Thanks and hope this helps! :)
Thanks so much! We're glad you found it helpful. That is a very subjective and personal decision of course. With that said, my recommendation would be to test out both models at a showroom to see if the difference is substantial enough to you to justify the additional costs.
Ultimately, it comes down to a matter of preference. With that said, the FP30X is a little more affordable, particularly if you don't require the stands and a full triple pedal system. The speakers are a little higher powered and it also has more built-in sounds. Thanks and hope this helps! :)
If you need it to look nice in your home, the RP107 is the obvious choice. The controls on the FP30X can be a little irritating, and you really should get a proper matching stand and pedals anyway, which means you will save little money (if any) by buying the FP-30X. Consider the F-107 if it's out yet. Should be a little cheaper than the RP-107. Just a different shape. Or pick up an older model from the same series (someone will have old stock) if these models are too expensive for you.
FP-30X is a better digital piano. It has more extensive connectivity options, including Digital Audio Interface that seems to be almost always neglected in these review and which is very important. In addition, FP-30X gives you more placement flexibility (and potential move). I believe that its resale value is also better.
@@mfurman Yes, it's better in terms of value for money, and I would certainly want the connectivity you mention, every time. But some customers might only want a simple home piano complete with a nice cabinet. Something to cover the keys properly can be important too, particularly with small children and pets about. Generally, portable pianos in family homes, are less respected (maybe shoved into cupboards/wardrobes) and easier to knock about too, so they might not last as long as home pianos.
@@Zoco101 I appreciate your points. I can only say that I have had seven digital pianos in the last 3 years and all were portable (with dedicated stands in most cases). My current one (P-515) looks just fine with the dedicated stand and pedals. I can move it, whenever I want to. I first look at specs and much later at the cabinet. The best Roland digital piano from the point of view of features (that matter) and specs is FP-90X. None of the higher end (including LX line) Roland digital pianos has Digital Audio Interface (most Yamaha digital pianos do)
I've watched a lot of videos on this channel (amazing, btw) and now I'm inclined to go for the RP107 for my first digital piano (I intend to take classes with my son). But now I've just found a good deal on a used F140R (30% cheaper than a new RP107). I cannot audition the models before buying. Which one do you recommend for us?
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in and writing in with your question! It all comes down to a matter of personal preference. My recommendation would be to test out both pianos in person before making a decision. Another big thing to consider is warranty. It is difficult to assess whether the F140R is a better deal without knowing the actual standing of the instrument and, more specifically, the action. From that perspective, a new RP107 would be the safer option in my opinion. :)
Hello Sir, amazing review!! I'm a professional bass player and teacher lately in my academy I had to move rooms and got one with a piano in it. I had to give it a try, never played one !! yep as crazy as it sounds in my 20 years + teaching career no piano at all! hell ya I few in love with it now I'm looking for something to accompany my playing needs at home 99.9% of the time i use headphones so a small speaker is no problem. what gets me interested and not sure if I understand it correctly is Bluetooth, hence here is the question can I hook up my tablet or phone to it and watch lessons on YT while using output for Headphones on the piano? so i can hear in headphones the youtube lesson and also my playing of the piano.thanks
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for writing in! That is awesome to hear that you've discovered the joys of playing piano. :) In terms of using headphones and Bluetooth audio, I believe that should work. You should be able to hear both the piano and the lesson audio from the RUclips video in your headphones.
Hi! Brent here! Congrats on your RP107! The sounds featured in this video are actually the default settings. Unless noted otherwise in the video, we typically showcase the default piano sounds.
Hi! Brent here! We are not Korg dealers, so I personally don't have a ton of experience with the LP380 model. With that said, I will pass along the suggestion to possibly review that model to our production team on your behalf. :)
As far as I know, we don't have the MP200 model here in Canada. At least, I have not seen one yet. So, the only thing I can personally attest to is that the RP107 provides an amazing musical experience (especially when it comes to the action).
Hello Stu, I know that both pianos have PH4 action, but do FP30x and F107 have exactly the same keyboard? Does the FP30x lose anything by being portable? thanks.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! We don't carry the F107, so I can't speak with too much authority on the matter. However, Roland tends to use the exact same PHA4 action in many of their entry to mid-tier models. I wouldn't say the FP30X loses anything by being portable. In fact, it has a more powerful speaker system than the RP107 model for instance. Some portable pianos actually tend to be more feature rich than console digitals. :)
You're welcome! No, not exactly. Every single one of the models you listed have their own unique characteristics. For instance, the FP30X has more built-in tones than the GP3. The best bet would be to do a comparison of their spec sheets. There is a blend of similarities as well as key differences. :)
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! They are quite similar in terms of their core piano experience (action and tone engine). The main differences are the speaker power (the FP30X has a 22 watt system versus the RP107's 16 watt system), the control interface (the FP30X has more onboard controls), and the aesthetic (the RP107 is a full console digital whereas the FP30X is a portable digital). The RP107 package also comes with everything you need (i.e. built-in stand, triple pedals, and matching bench).
They are quite similar in terms of their actions and tone engines. The RP107 is designed for home-use given that it is a console digital piano. The FP30X is a bit more flexible given its portable design. If you are doing any type of moving with the piano or performance, the FP30X would be the better of the two options naturally.
well i what about difference between rp 107 and 701 i have searched on a website between comparison well there's actually difference but is that worth it? and also there was written that rp 107 have 5 types of touch sensitivity and rp 701 have 100 levels well 100 levels and 5 types now i don't know what they mean the words are different i am so confused on this thing
The RP701 is a step above the RP107 in terms of specs and features. Touch sensitivity refers to how heavy/light the keys will feel (however, this is achieved by adjusting the sonic output). The RP701's 100 gradients of control definitely allow you to dial in more exact touch parameters that fit your preferences.
seems they alreay note deffect design from rp102 and add a more power amplifier，hope they will add fuse on left speaker to avoid the low power amplifier clipping damage the driver
The RP107's speaker system is a meaningful step up from the RP102's speaker system to say the least. Regarding your note, I am quite confident that Roland has made all of the necessary design decisions to ensure longevity. :)
Thank you so much! The Roland FP-E50 is a very different piano. It is loaded with features that are intended for entertainment/performance use whereas the Roland RP107 is specifically geared towards home-use. If you are mainly looking for an instrument to practice piano on, the Roland RP107 offers an all-in option that includes a stand and pedals. However, if you are looking to have some fun with a variety of features, the FP-E50 is certainly worth consideration.
i am so confused on buying on piano because i am not capable pf buying that expensive stuff and obviously i don't want to waste my money i was thinking for buying this rp 107 but the only thing i see is the power consumption is 8W are you serious the 701 have 20w even fp 30x have 18W soo does this have good speaker i mean okay all the specs are same i could buy this butt i am the person who will use speakerss so is this a good choice i am a guy who wants to play chopin liszt liebertraum and most of the beautiful romentic music but i am litrally so confused and i think i cannot go for 701 its more expensive for me
Thanks for the question! While we tend to get obsessed with quantified specs, such as power rating of speakers. It is important to note that speaker sound is a complicated matter. Perceived volume is not dictated exclusively by speaker power. The acoustic chamber the speakers are housed in, the way their voiced, and the actual design of the amplifier will all impact the perceived volume and fidelity of the piano's speaker system. To that point, the RP107 has an excellent speaker system, which offers a very rewarding musical experience. :)
Guitar Center has Roland RP501 on sale for now and was about to buy it but saw this RP107 and now I am stock on which to get. They have also a Williams Overture III on sale. What would you recommend?
Hi there! The RP501 is an older model. With that said, it is a slight step up from the RP107. At the end of the day, it really comes down to a matter of personal preference. Having a current generation model might be appealing to some for instance. :)
That is a very personal decision! Personally, I favour the RP107's PHA4 action, but I favour the KDP120's piano sound. So, from that perspective, I think it comes down to which element of the piano experience you prioritize (tone vs touch). Thanks and hope this helps! :)
There are certainly a lot of shared features amongst these various models, but there are some key differences. For instance, the speaker/amplifier power is 3W per channel greater on the FP30X and GP3 models than the RP107.
Hi, I played for a while and stopped. Now I wanna start again and thinking about the RP 107 and the RP701. Can you give me some Recomendation? I am based in germany. The RP107 would cost me 900€ and the RP 701 1125€. I wonder if the 200€ more are worth it? Id appreciate any help.
Hi! Brent here! Ultimately, that is a very personal decision to make. The RP701 has more built-in sounds and features, but the primary difference is going to be the speaker system. If the better speaker fidelity is appealing, the RP701 might be the better choice. The best bet is to test out both in person to determine which one you are more satisfied with based on its corresponding price.
Thanks for this.. if it doesn't have audio outs does that mean when you're recording to DAW through the headphone out, you won't be able to hear anything? Except if you're monitoring with delay of course..
Does the Roland F-107 have similar "tone ports" to those Stu points to on the front (by key cover) and top (at the joint with the side piece) of the RP-107?
Hi there! We have not received an F107 model yet, so, unfortunately, I cannot comment on that. With that said, perhaps, one of our community members that owns an F107 can chime in. :)
It all comes down to musical preference of course. Both digital pianos are excellent starting points. However, I personally favour the heavier touch of the PHA4 action, which the RP107 features.
We don't carry the F107 at this time, so I can't really comment on it. But, the RP107 is an excellent instrument with a wonderful balance of touch, tone, and speaker fidelity. :)
I really can Not understand why somebody would spend nearly 2000$ for a digi piano that only sounds good with headphones. The reviews showing the line sound in 95% of the time, the other 5% real Sound via microphones are revealing a boxy caged sound.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Even the highest quality stereo pair of condenser microphones will never fully-capture every sonic detail of a speakers sound within a room. From that perspective, I would recommend testing out this model in person to get the full experience. Sometimes, the sound in person will surprise you. :)
They're virtually the same instrument in terms of tone (SuperNATURAL Piano engine), touch (PHA4), and speaker power. It really comes down to whether you prefer a portable or console style design. If the piano is going to primarily live in one place, the RP107 would probably make more sense. If you are going to be travelling with or moving the piano at all, the FP30X would be the ideal solution. Thanks and hope this helps! :)
I purchased this digital piano and I find that when I press a pedal, the pedal board bends slightly. There is about 0.25 cm gap between the pedals' rubber pad and the floor. Is this normal?
Hi there! I am sorry to hear that you are experiencing some issues with the pedalboard. That sounds a bit unusual to be honest. Our floor model does not have that gap. It is possible that the pedalboard was not installed correctly.
Thanks for the suggestion! We are not Donner dealers, so it might be difficult to tackle that comparison, but we do receive models on trade sometimes. If we happen to get a Donner SE-1, we will do our best to tackle that for you! :)
We would definitely recommend auditioning the instrument in person as it is the only way to fully-appreciate and test onboard speakers. They are quite excellent sounding and are big step up from the RP102's speakers in terms of power and fidelity.
Today I got my new Roland F107 digital piano. Since there are no Roland dealers in my area, I bought it online (used but like new). What a disappointment. Compared to my 20 year old Clavinova CLP115, it feels and sound like a toy. The keyboard is terrible, cheap and plasticky, the sound is awful even compared to the old Yamaha. The cabinetry is cheap. The specs might be impressive on paper, but in reality it is an inferior product. The only good thing is that I got it very cheap and can resell it without problems.
I am sorry to hear that you are not pleased with your F107. While technology across all price points have improved, it should be said that the Clavinova CLP series is a higher-end line that the Roland F and RP lines. There is also something to be said about familiarity. When we have spent a long time on a specific instrument, we get to know it quite well and learn to extract the most out of it musically. There is a process with getting acquainted with new instruments. At the end of the day, I hope you're able to find an instrument that you connect with musically though.
@@MerriamPianos Thanks for your kind reply. My post was not a critique of your endorsement of the F107 (or RP107) although Stu is partially to blame. His playing is so brilliant that he makes any instrument look awesome :). I agree completely. The F107 is an entry level piano, and perhaps I expected too much. While it is true that technology improves, few or nowadays products are made to last. My first piano, a Korg C15S, was built like a tank and oozed quality. 30 years later, it still looked and played like new. By comparison, the Clavinova seemed less than satisfactory at first. But today, playing it side by side with the Roland, the difference was so obvious.
I own this piano and it's my first piano (I'm a beginner). I love it very much, it sounds great; I love learning and playing on it (practise one hour a day). Also the bluetooth midi connections never failed me (for who wants to know 🙂)
Congrats on your Roland RP107! It is a fantastic all-around piano with a great tone, touch, and speaker system. I am glad to hear that you have had success with it and its Bluetooth MIDI connection. Thanks for tuning in and happy playing! :)
I short update after playing this piano for almost a year now. I still love it and practise 3 to 5 times a week. I am still a beginner but I do notice that I am starting to long for a more fuller sound. I don’t how to describe it but it sounds al little like your inside a clothing closet. With headphones it’s a lot better. And rewatching this video: mine doesn’t sound as clear. Maybe it’s the wrong placement in the livingroom, I don’t know.
I am looking for external speakers I can connect. This will probably help.
Thank you so much for sharing. Have you started noticing any decline in sound quality or action after playing it for over a year? I am planning on getting this piano in the next couple of weeks. I was debating between this or the Kawai kdp 120 because of the bigger speakers on it. However, after watching this, i am sticking with the Roland.
@@ExplanationNextHi! No I didn't notice any decline in sound quality after playig it for a longer time. I prefer playing with headphones it gives the best quality of sound. haven't bought any speakers yet.
I have never owned a Roland (or even played one at a store), but since subscribing to this channel, I have learned so much about Roland, and have become a big fan. Thanks Stu--you have convinced me to venture out to my local store so I can experience it first hand.
Thanks so much for tuning in! We're very happy to hear that our videos have inspired you to check out the Roland line. They make wonderful instruments! I am quite confident you will be thrilled with what they offer musically. :)
The best reveiw about digital pianos in RUclips. But this model is good for jazz or improvisations but for real classical studying is a question....
Thanks so much! That is quite the compliment and one that we appreciate immensely! The RP107 is quite versatile musically. Also, it makes for an excellent companion to any players studying classical repertoire as the action is one of the most authentic feeling at its price point. :)
Admittedly, I am a jazz musician, but I do have a classical background.
Price really matters at entry level, but you still want a nice action and a decent tone that you won't grow out of too quickly. Accordingly I was impressed by the predecessor to this piano when I tried it at a showroom in Spain. Actually it was an F model, not an RP, but functionally, they are the same. It's great to get the incisive PHA4 action at this pricepoint.
The Kawai home piano nearest to this price (in the same showroom) sounded tinny to me, and the action (not RH3 I think) was very light too. In fairness to Kawai, it may be that the hard floor surface favoured the Roland speakers, and a different surface might have favoured the Kawai. And maybe other players prefer the ever-so-light action, just not me.
Unless the price has gone up a lot with the new models, I would not hesitate to recommend Roland RP/F pianos to first time buyers on a budget, though it's probably worth saving a few dollars and getting an F model, which will also occupy less space.
The Yamaha YDP-164 was a great alternative, but its successor the 165 is a little too pricey IMO.
@@Zoco101do you recommend Yamaha ydp-145 or a Roland rp107? Thanks in advance for the answer
@@alfredoadice8331 That's a tough one. The RP107 action is better IMO, but the YDP-145 piano sound and speakers should be better. I think I'd prefer the YDP-145, but isn't it a bit more expensive?
I tried the previous 144 & 164 models, and I can vouch for those. If you can get the YDP-165 (which has the GH3 action) that will be better for heavy practice. Better still, if you can find an old stock YDP-164, you can have virtually the same instrument (as the 165) and save money. It was priced the same as the 145, is now but the action was better IMO. Maybe the speakers too.
Mercifully, Yamaha's GHS action (found on most Yamaha DPs with plastic actions) does seem to be getting better. Recently I purchased a P-121 for my motorhome and for light gigs and rehearsals. I'm satisfied with it. The action is just good enough for what I'm playing on it, which is mainly early jazz. I still prefer my old P-255 of course. It has the GH action.
Don't dismiss Korg and Casio home pianos in this price range.
I have this piano, it's amazing. Agree with Stu regarding the speaker box design. It feels very big compared to the specs. And the first time I used a good pair of headphones on mine, I was blown away. Couldn't make out weather the sound was coming from the headphones or the speakers. I'm in love with this piano. Add a smartphone or an ipad, it gives you the full power. If your considering buying this, go for it. It's amazing. And the supernatural piano is wow!!! You have string resonance. You have dissonance. Only thing I didn't like, the keys are a bit noisy. But it's an issue with the PHA4 action and is present in all devices using that action. Overall it's an amazing piano.
Congrats on your RP107! They're fantastic digital pianos with a great touch and tone. :)
Rp501 what is the comparison comment
Thank you for your comment! Was considering this model but noisy keys would drive me crazy. You can hear it here 9:10
RP107 is my first and current piano.. i have learned a lot in the past year on this piano. However i am ready to move on to an acoustic piano. Which is probable a good thing! The Roland kept me happy, i practiced every day, and have earned an upgrade, in my opinion. It is pretty entry level... Good to hear the PHA4 action is decent. Was worried it wouldn't be good enough for a beginner.
The RP107 is an excellent instrument to begin your journey on. The combination of the PHA4 action and SuperNATURAL tone engine offers a rewarding and authentic musical experience. It is great to hear that it served you well in the first phase of your piano journey. Thanks for tuning in and happy playing! :)
I owned a Roland RP401R (PHA-4 action and SuperNatural piano tone generator) for about a year before I sold it. I have also owned a couple of Yamaha Arius YDP 14# (GHS action) and 16# (GH3 action) models. Apparently, Roland has 4 trim levels of RP models: RP102, RP107, RP501R, and RP701. If this is correct, then I must have owned the second highest RP model, which included 72 rhythms (drums and bass). The current model to the piano I had is the RP501R. So, that trim level has a basic arranger, but not as full as the FP-E50, which includes other instruments in the accompaniment (other than drums and bass). I actually opened it several times to do tests with the speakers. If you remove the top lid, the sound is more open and full because the speakers are not contained in dedicated speaker boxes, so the back of the speaker is facing down and exposed. Then the speakers start to act like a grand piano soundboard, firing downward and upward without any baffle containing the sound. I think if you are playing at home with other people (bass player, guitar, drums, etc), removing the top lid will give you a fuller sound, but I don't recommend doing it, so you don't void the warranty.
Good call! I suppose for players that have an instrument out of warranty, it is a nice little trick to get a bit more out of the piano sonically. Thanks for sharing the tip! :)
@@MerriamPianos My pleasure :)
You can do it once the waranty expires haha🎹🎶
Rp107 or rp501 what is your suggestion
@@kronoshayalet3322 I think the RP501R is a bit richer in features (for example, auto-accompaniment and more sounds, a little more amplifier power), but you might not need them. It seems to me they are pretty close in terms of piano performance. The RP107 is likely to be about the same than the RP501R for $300 less (at least here in the US). I believe I have played these late-model Roland pianos in the store, but I didn't pay much attention to the details of the sound. Maybe in person you might find more significant differences.
Hi, I'm a beginner but looking for a great piano to start practice with! Now I'm stuck between the rp107 and fp30x. I'm confused which one should I get. I'm looking for a better sound, touch, and actions. I don't really mind the price difference and the portability. Could you please tell me which one is better and I should buy :) thanks
Hi! Brent here! The RP107 and FP30X have very similar profiles in a number of ways. They both have the same PHA4 action and SuperNATURAL tone engine. With that said, the RP107 has a 16W speaker system versus the FP30X's 11W speaker system. So, in that category, there is a slight edge for the RP107. :)
@@MerriamPianoshis is incorrect. The fp30x is 2x11w for 22w total while the rp107 is 2x8w for 16 total.
Thank you for the review! I've also seen your comparison of the Casio AP 710 and the Roland HP702. My son is just starting out with piano, and we plan to rent one for his first year before making a purchase (we're based in France). Even though I've played the piano for nearly three decades, I'm unfamiliar with digital pianos. Given the choice between the Roland RP107 and the Casio AP710, which would you recommend?
Thank you very much 😊
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in! We're glad you liked the review video! At the end of the day, it comes down to the preferences of the player. The AP710 is a higher rated instrument and, in my opinion, it has a nicer speaker system and piano tone, but the touch is a little on the lighter side. The RP107 has a heavier touch with escapement. For classical piano study, I might lean a little in that direction, but, if piano sound is the main priority, I would give the edge to the AP710. :)
Thanks, Stu! Great video, as usual!
Hi! Brent here! Thanks for tuning in! I will pass on your kind words to Stu for you. :)
With just the speakers the piano sounds a bit thin and tinny kind of like a smallish size acoustic piano. Really appreciate the honest demo.
You're very welcome! Thank you for tuning in! The sound is certainly not as lush and full as a more sophisticated and higher power speaker system, but it is a meaningful step up from its predecessor (the RP102). :)
I’m having a hard time deciding between the RP107 and the Casio PX870, which are both the same price in USD. We have an upright Yamaha P22. This would be for my young daughter who has played piano for 4 years as a secondary practice instrument. Thoughts? Thank you for your wonderful videos!
Thanks for tuning in and supporting our channel! It really comes down to a matter of personal preference. For me, the RP107 has a bit more of an authentic playing experience due to its PHA4 action. It is a heavier touch than the PX870 and also features escapement and triple sensors. With that said, the PX870 has an awesome speaker system and really beautiful piano sound. If the main goal is to have an instrument for classical piano study, I would lean in the direction of the RP107 personally. :)
hey Stu You could Use the Usb For the audio output instead of the headphone and use the speakers once playing i think this model as the fp30x have audio interface built in
Hi there! Brent from Merriam Music here! The RP107 does not have a USB audio interface built-in, but the FP30X does.
I have just sat down at an RP-107 and an RP-102. They sound very different. I found the bass end on the 107 internal speakers sounded exaggerated, but generally, I felt that this model deserves a slightly better action. So much has improved on the 107 that now the action seems left behind. I tried a YDP-165 & a 145 too. These sound more refined to me than the RP models, but the GHS action on the 145 is inferior even IMO to the RP models ' PHA4 action, which I am beginning to dislike anyway. The YDP-165 completely outclasses the others I mentioned, though so did the old YDP-164, which was superb value for money.
The RP107 is definitely a marked improvement from the RP102. While some may have been hoping for an updated action, the PHA4 action still stands up as a wonderful and reliable choice. In terms of the YDP165 outshining the other models, to some extent, that is to be expected given the price difference. Something like the F701 or RP701 from Roland would be a fairer comparison given their associated price points. :)
@@MerriamPianos Yes, you're right to correct me. I was a little concerned about mentioning the Yamaha YDP-165 in the same context as a Roland RP-107, since I didn't know the RP-107's price.
I see now that it's around 900 euros, which is closer to the YDP-145 price than the 165 price. Since the 145 only has a GHS action, the RP-107 marginally wins on action. I say marginally because the PHA4 doesn't feel as good as I dimly recall the implementation on the FP-30X.
But the YDP-145 main piano patch beats the RP-107, at least for my ears.
You have to put up with some irritating limitations at entry level, so there's no point in buying extras like a fancier cabinet. I think that Roland's (very similar) F models are marginally better value for money than the RP models.
The RP-701LA and the F-701LA should be very nice. Let's hope the PHA4 action has been implemented a little better than on the RP-701.
What are those headphones that Stu is using here?
(also curious to know if they are his main go-to set of headphones)
Wonderful review as always
🎶
Thanks so much! The headphones Stu is using in this video are the Meze 99 Neo model. They are fantastic headphones! I believe they are Stu's current favourite. :)
Hello, I have a question. So I’ve been watching a lot of your reviews lately and I’ve seen so many good digital pianos. However, I was wondering if you could tell me what the best digital piano out there for $2000 and under is. I’m willing to spend that 2000 if it’s worth the buy, but I just don’t know which digital piano truly provides the best of the best when it comes to sound quality, key feel, ect. Up for any recommendations of any brands
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thank you for tuning into our channel! One of the reasons why you likely won't find any reviewer explicitly declaring the "best" piano at a given price point is that it is a very personal and subjective matter. Every piano manufacturer and model provides a a different touch and tone, which, depending on the preferences of the player, will resonate more or less from person to person. In my opinion, I think Kawai pianos offer the very best sound for under $2000. The KDP75 and KDP120 are excellent. If you can spring for the CN201, it would be well-worth the additional investment. In terms of touch, I tend to favour the Roland models as they're a little bit heavier and more robust in this particular price category. Options like the RP107 or F701 would be models worth exploring. Thanks and hope this helps! :)
@@MerriamPianos thank you so much, that helps a lot! Which do you think would be the better option between the cn201 and the ca49?
@@aandj-cu8ee the CA49. Just got it for my church. I fell in love with it. Wonderful action and amazing tone.
Love the review. I'm slightly worried about the speakers on the RP107, particularly the bass. Is it worth spending €300 more for the RP701?
Thanks so much! We're glad you found it helpful. That is a very subjective and personal decision of course. With that said, my recommendation would be to test out both models at a showroom to see if the difference is substantial enough to you to justify the additional costs.
Which one is better to buy? a fp30x or rp107 considering portability is not an issue, and I'll be using only grand piano tone
Ultimately, it comes down to a matter of preference. With that said, the FP30X is a little more affordable, particularly if you don't require the stands and a full triple pedal system. The speakers are a little higher powered and it also has more built-in sounds. Thanks and hope this helps! :)
If you need it to look nice in your home, the RP107 is the obvious choice. The controls on the FP30X can be a little irritating, and you really should get a proper matching stand and pedals anyway, which means you will save little money (if any) by buying the FP-30X. Consider the F-107 if it's out yet. Should be a little cheaper than the RP-107. Just a different shape. Or pick up an older model from the same series (someone will have old stock) if these models are too expensive for you.
FP-30X is a better digital piano. It has more extensive connectivity options, including Digital Audio Interface that seems to be almost always neglected in these review and which is very important.
In addition, FP-30X gives you more placement flexibility (and potential move). I believe that its resale value is also better.
@@mfurman Yes, it's better in terms of value for money, and I would certainly want the connectivity you mention, every time. But some customers might only want a simple home piano complete with a nice cabinet. Something to cover the keys properly can be important too, particularly with small children and pets about. Generally, portable pianos in family homes, are less respected (maybe shoved into cupboards/wardrobes) and easier to knock about too, so they might not last as long as home pianos.
@@Zoco101 I appreciate your points. I can only say that I have had seven digital pianos in the last 3 years and all were portable (with dedicated stands in most cases). My current one (P-515) looks just fine with the dedicated stand and pedals. I can move it, whenever I want to. I first look at specs and much later at the cabinet. The best Roland digital piano from the point of view of features (that matter) and specs is FP-90X. None of the higher end (including LX line) Roland digital pianos has Digital Audio Interface (most Yamaha digital pianos do)
I've watched a lot of videos on this channel (amazing, btw) and now I'm inclined to go for the RP107 for my first digital piano (I intend to take classes with my son). But now I've just found a good deal on a used F140R (30% cheaper than a new RP107). I cannot audition the models before buying. Which one do you recommend for us?
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in and writing in with your question! It all comes down to a matter of personal preference. My recommendation would be to test out both pianos in person before making a decision. Another big thing to consider is warranty. It is difficult to assess whether the F140R is a better deal without knowing the actual standing of the instrument and, more specifically, the action. From that perspective, a new RP107 would be the safer option in my opinion. :)
@@MerriamPianos Thank you. I'll see if I manage to test them. Congratulations on the channel!
Hello Sir, amazing review!! I'm a professional bass player and teacher lately in my academy I had to move rooms and got one with a piano in it. I had to give it a try, never played one !! yep as crazy as it sounds in my 20 years + teaching career no piano at all! hell ya I few in love with it now I'm looking for something to accompany my playing needs at home 99.9% of the time i use headphones so a small speaker is no problem. what gets me interested and not sure if I understand it correctly is Bluetooth, hence here is the question can I hook up my tablet or phone to it and watch lessons on YT while using output for Headphones on the piano? so i can hear in headphones the youtube lesson and also my playing of the piano.thanks
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for writing in! That is awesome to hear that you've discovered the joys of playing piano. :)
In terms of using headphones and Bluetooth audio, I believe that should work. You should be able to hear both the piano and the lesson audio from the RUclips video in your headphones.
Thank you !! Appreciate it 🤙❤️
Hi, stu. Could you tell me the piano setting? I just bought RP107, but my piano sound is not clean, sounds like cloged or blocked by something.
Hi! Brent here! Congrats on your RP107! The sounds featured in this video are actually the default settings. Unless noted otherwise in the video, we typically showcase the default piano sounds.
How does this one compare to the Korg LP380? In my country these are the two available in the same price range.
Hi! Brent here! We are not Korg dealers, so I personally don't have a ton of experience with the LP380 model. With that said, I will pass along the suggestion to possibly review that model to our production team on your behalf. :)
@@MerriamPianos Thank You!
Very informative review, thanks. I m looking for either Roland MP200 or RP107, I can’t really figure out the difference, any advices?
As far as I know, we don't have the MP200 model here in Canada. At least, I have not seen one yet. So, the only thing I can personally attest to is that the RP107 provides an amazing musical experience (especially when it comes to the action).
Nice improvisation
I'll be sure to pass on the compliment to Stu for you! :)
Hello Stu, I know that both pianos have PH4 action, but do FP30x and F107 have exactly the same keyboard? Does the FP30x lose anything by being portable? thanks.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! We don't carry the F107, so I can't speak with too much authority on the matter. However, Roland tends to use the exact same PHA4 action in many of their entry to mid-tier models. I wouldn't say the FP30X loses anything by being portable. In fact, it has a more powerful speaker system than the RP107 model for instance. Some portable pianos actually tend to be more feature rich than console digitals. :)
@Merriam Music thanks! So does that mean the GP3 is an FP30X in a grand piano stile case?🎹🎶
You're welcome! No, not exactly. Every single one of the models you listed have their own unique characteristics. For instance, the FP30X has more built-in tones than the GP3. The best bet would be to do a comparison of their spec sheets. There is a blend of similarities as well as key differences. :)
Wow !!!I Nice !!!!
Thanks a million! We appreciate it. :)
Hi Stu, is this better than the FP30x or they similar. I don't know which to choose?
Thank you :)
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! They are quite similar in terms of their core piano experience (action and tone engine). The main differences are the speaker power (the FP30X has a 22 watt system versus the RP107's 16 watt system), the control interface (the FP30X has more onboard controls), and the aesthetic (the RP107 is a full console digital whereas the FP30X is a portable digital). The RP107 package also comes with everything you need (i.e. built-in stand, triple pedals, and matching bench).
can you say what users the rp107 and fp30x are best for?
They are quite similar in terms of their actions and tone engines. The RP107 is designed for home-use given that it is a console digital piano. The FP30X is a bit more flexible given its portable design. If you are doing any type of moving with the piano or performance, the FP30X would be the better of the two options naturally.
well i what about difference between rp 107 and 701 i have searched on a website between comparison well there's actually difference but is that worth it? and also there was written that rp 107 have 5 types of touch sensitivity and rp 701 have 100 levels well 100 levels and 5 types now i don't know what they mean the words are different i am so confused on this thing
The RP701 is a step above the RP107 in terms of specs and features. Touch sensitivity refers to how heavy/light the keys will feel (however, this is achieved by adjusting the sonic output). The RP701's 100 gradients of control definitely allow you to dial in more exact touch parameters that fit your preferences.
seems they alreay note deffect design from rp102 and add a more power amplifier，hope they will add fuse on left speaker to avoid the low power amplifier clipping damage the driver
The RP107's speaker system is a meaningful step up from the RP102's speaker system to say the least. Regarding your note, I am quite confident that Roland has made all of the necessary design decisions to ensure longevity. :)
Great review, how does this stack up against the FP-E50? For 1st digital piano for uni student after playing acoustic upright at home...
Thank you so much! The Roland FP-E50 is a very different piano. It is loaded with features that are intended for entertainment/performance use whereas the Roland RP107 is specifically geared towards home-use. If you are mainly looking for an instrument to practice piano on, the Roland RP107 offers an all-in option that includes a stand and pedals. However, if you are looking to have some fun with a variety of features, the FP-E50 is certainly worth consideration.
i am so confused on buying on piano because i am not capable pf buying that expensive stuff and obviously i don't want to waste my money i was thinking for buying this rp 107 but the only thing i see is the power consumption is 8W are you serious the 701 have 20w even fp 30x have 18W soo does this have good speaker i mean okay all the specs are same i could buy this butt i am the person who will use speakerss so is this a good choice i am a guy who wants to play chopin liszt liebertraum and most of the beautiful romentic music but i am litrally so confused and i think i cannot go for 701 its more expensive for me
Thanks for the question! While we tend to get obsessed with quantified specs, such as power rating of speakers. It is important to note that speaker sound is a complicated matter. Perceived volume is not dictated exclusively by speaker power. The acoustic chamber the speakers are housed in, the way their voiced, and the actual design of the amplifier will all impact the perceived volume and fidelity of the piano's speaker system. To that point, the RP107 has an excellent speaker system, which offers a very rewarding musical experience. :)
Guitar Center has Roland RP501 on sale for now and was about to buy it but saw this RP107 and now I am stock on which to get. They have also a Williams Overture III on sale. What would you recommend?
Hi there! The RP501 is an older model. With that said, it is a slight step up from the RP107. At the end of the day, it really comes down to a matter of personal preference. Having a current generation model might be appealing to some for instance. :)
@@MerriamPianos Thanks! Now I am down to Williams Overture III vs Roland RP107. Have you tried the Williams Overture III?
@Merriam Music thanks again!
BTW the (IC) in my other comment stands for Instrumental Covers haha🎹🎶
No problem at all! And I know! ;)
If we want to choose between the rp 107 and the kawai KDP 120, which one do you think we should choose?
That is a very personal decision! Personally, I favour the RP107's PHA4 action, but I favour the KDP120's piano sound. So, from that perspective, I think it comes down to which element of the piano experience you prioritize (tone vs touch). Thanks and hope this helps! :)
Yesss, thank you for the great review!
You're very welcome! Thank you for tuning in! :)
Aren't the FP30X and GP3 the same thing with the GP3 having a very small grand piano stile case?🎹🎶
There are certainly a lot of shared features amongst these various models, but there are some key differences. For instance, the speaker/amplifier power is 3W per channel greater on the FP30X and GP3 models than the RP107.
Hi, I played for a while and stopped. Now I wanna start again and thinking about the RP 107 and the RP701. Can you give me some Recomendation? I am based in germany. The RP107 would cost me 900€ and the RP 701 1125€. I wonder if the 200€ more are worth it? Id appreciate any help.
Hi! Brent here! Ultimately, that is a very personal decision to make. The RP701 has more built-in sounds and features, but the primary difference is going to be the speaker system. If the better speaker fidelity is appealing, the RP701 might be the better choice. The best bet is to test out both in person to determine which one you are more satisfied with based on its corresponding price.
@@MerriamPianos Thank you very much.😊👍
Thanks for this.. if it doesn't have audio outs does that mean when you're recording to DAW through the headphone out, you won't be able to hear anything? Except if you're monitoring with delay of course..
You're very welcome! :)
The RP107 has dual headphone outputs, so you could take one feed for recording purposes and one to plug in headphones. :)
@@MerriamPianos ah great!
Does the Roland F-107 have similar "tone ports" to those Stu points to on the front (by key cover) and top (at the joint with the side piece) of the RP-107?
Hi there! We have not received an F107 model yet, so, unfortunately, I cannot comment on that. With that said, perhaps, one of our community members that owns an F107 can chime in. :)
Would you pick this Roland instead of the Casio px 870?
It all comes down to musical preference of course. Both digital pianos are excellent starting points. However, I personally favour the heavier touch of the PHA4 action, which the RP107 features.
How does this compare to the F107? I am torn between the two and can't visit a showroom.
We don't carry the F107 at this time, so I can't really comment on it. But, the RP107 is an excellent instrument with a wonderful balance of touch, tone, and speaker fidelity. :)
I really can Not understand why somebody would spend nearly 2000$ for a digi piano that only sounds good with headphones. The reviews showing the line sound in 95% of the time, the other 5% real Sound via microphones are revealing a boxy caged sound.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Even the highest quality stereo pair of condenser microphones will never fully-capture every sonic detail of a speakers sound within a room. From that perspective, I would recommend testing out this model in person to get the full experience. Sometimes, the sound in person will surprise you. :)
roland rp 107 or fp 30x?
They're virtually the same instrument in terms of tone (SuperNATURAL Piano engine), touch (PHA4), and speaker power. It really comes down to whether you prefer a portable or console style design. If the piano is going to primarily live in one place, the RP107 would probably make more sense. If you are going to be travelling with or moving the piano at all, the FP30X would be the ideal solution. Thanks and hope this helps! :)
I purchased this digital piano and I find that when I press a pedal, the pedal board bends slightly. There is about 0.25 cm gap between the pedals' rubber pad and the floor. Is this normal?
Hi there! I am sorry to hear that you are experiencing some issues with the pedalboard. That sounds a bit unusual to be honest. Our floor model does not have that gap. It is possible that the pedalboard was not installed correctly.
Do I need to reassemble the digital piano?
Hi. Do you know medeli digital pianos? (Maybe sp4000)
Hi! Brent here! I have seen Medellin digital pianos before online, but I am not familiar with them otherwise.
RP107 or Donner SE-1?
Thanks for the suggestion! We are not Donner dealers, so it might be difficult to tackle that comparison, but we do receive models on trade sometimes. If we happen to get a Donner SE-1, we will do our best to tackle that for you! :)
Shoutout to IC\//_///🎹🎶🎵🎵🎵🎹🎹🎹!!! LOO🎹🎶
Thanks for tuning in! :)
🍺🍾🍷🍧🍦😁
@@Instrumental-Covers I don't drinkc haha! I do love ice cream though haha
@@MERCEDES-BENZS600GUARD_V12 Do you like rum raisin ice cream?😁
@@Instrumental-Covers haven't tried that yet🎹🎶
Ok features, sound through the speakers is underwhelming.
We would definitely recommend auditioning the instrument in person as it is the only way to fully-appreciate and test onboard speakers. They are quite excellent sounding and are big step up from the RP102's speakers in terms of power and fidelity.
Today I got my new Roland F107 digital piano. Since there are no Roland dealers in my area, I bought it online (used but like new). What a disappointment. Compared to my 20 year old Clavinova CLP115, it feels and sound like a toy. The keyboard is terrible, cheap and plasticky, the sound is awful even compared to the old Yamaha. The cabinetry is cheap. The specs might be impressive on paper, but in reality it is an inferior product. The only good thing is that I got it very cheap and can resell it without problems.
I am sorry to hear that you are not pleased with your F107. While technology across all price points have improved, it should be said that the Clavinova CLP series is a higher-end line that the Roland F and RP lines. There is also something to be said about familiarity. When we have spent a long time on a specific instrument, we get to know it quite well and learn to extract the most out of it musically. There is a process with getting acquainted with new instruments. At the end of the day, I hope you're able to find an instrument that you connect with musically though.
@@MerriamPianos Thanks for your kind reply. My post was not a critique of your endorsement of the F107 (or RP107) although Stu is partially to blame. His playing is so brilliant that he makes any instrument look awesome :). I agree completely. The F107 is an entry level piano, and perhaps I expected too much. While it is true that technology improves, few or nowadays products are made to last. My first piano, a Korg C15S, was built like a tank and oozed quality. 30 years later, it still looked and played like new. By comparison, the Clavinova seemed less than satisfactory at first. But today, playing it side by side with the Roland, the difference was so obvious.