LGB Drop the T: Another Video Not Available on YouTube
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 авг 2022
- When important Progressive ideas surface, Right Angle is there to examine the foundations and consequences. RUclips, however, is not the place for serious discussion of issues. So this episode of Right Angle is hosted only at Rumble (as are nearly all our shows), and you can watch it at our site (as you always can).
Click here to watch this video at our site - bit.ly/LGBdroptheT
Thanks to our Members, who provide that vast majority of our funding, because people who want to have real conversations can't rely on YT.
I was at a speakers rally in Port Townsend WA Monday featuring Julie Jaman, an 80 year old woman who objected to a man in a woman's bathing suit in the pool shower room. In response she was permanently expelled from the pool.
We held a press conference and invited women activists and ladies from the local community to speak. The "T" supporters intruded on our event and proceeded to bully, push, elbow, shove, knock down, and shout down the women - mostly senior citizens from our community who supported Julie. They also attempted to disable our sound equipment, steal our possessions, blast us with bull horns and loud whistles, and the list goes on. The police did virtually nothing.
I'm glad the gay / lesbian community wants to ditch the T. Now we need to convince the schools, businesses, and government offices that it was all a delusion. They need to roll back policies that buy into this lie or teach it to little children! Women have fought for decades to achieve equal rights and social standing. These Jokers are obliterating women's rights. This is a hate crime as well as abuse.
#LetJulieSwim
ThemTube, just call it ThemTube, because it's obvious it's for them.
Amazing that on RUclips, YOU can't create certain factual content for discussion any more. They need to change the name.
But..But They have Rules. Or so it is alleged.
Yep LwC got bounced for what the guest said. Will watch them on R later.
THEMTube
@@zedhiro6131
RUclips search
Elizabeth Warren says 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
Interesting, None of them got banned.
ScrewTube.
I watched it on Rumble, and it's spot on. Too bad that you can't have these types of discussions and debates on RUclips, where you have to cater to everyone's delicate inner child.
Scott is SPOT ON!!!
It's just a shame we have to sneak around behind Susan Wojcicki's back, who seems to be stuck in 1984, to have an adult discussion about a subject that a majority of people agree on.
Stuck in 1984? I think she (and others) are using it as a how to manual.
Thank you. I downloaded rumble on my ROKU & watched. ☝
Much better on the mic; Mr. Whittle; and thank you for that.
Well done - use the censor platform just for short ads ....
Excellent use of YT to get the word out about important topics that they censor.
This avenue will in time also be targeted. I remember 2009 ish or so i'd read comments on yah00 articles / stories etc.
Everything seemed wide open with differing opinions. Then at some point i noticed that the opinions were virtually not there anymore, it was all narrative pushing.
All controlled. Like people roaming freely then suddenly waking up to being stuck in cement that hardened overnight when they were sleeping = internet
I love that people are using RUclips to advertise for Rumble! I wonder if the powers that be will allow my comment to be seen by the public 😁😂
Off to see your video on Rumble now !
You should do this for all of your videos. Post no content on RUclips. Run as many ads as possible on a short RUclips video that links to your actual content on Rumble.
This issue affects less than 6% of the population
thanks guys. RUclips is dead. Stock tip for you Pelosi since following all your buys has gotten the investors so rich. SELL RUclips STOCKS!
The Three Musketeers as always spot on
Yay! Bill's audio is back!
Thank you for fixing your mic, Bill...
Thanks for the heads up. Interesting development... stay tuned.
This is good news , It's a good day.
Thank you
Thank you, gentlemen! Great segement.
Fantastic video. I shared it everywhere.
I am one of those that from the beginning believed this was a slippery slope, and always suspected that the NAMBLA organization was behind the push for legalization of marriage and adoption to eventually claim they have rights as well. I am 100% against gay men adopting children and always will be.
Definitely worth a listen. TY.
Thanks for the material on Rumble. It was shared!
I used to spend my time watching these videos on both YT AND Rumble (for BW to get the revenue credit) but I don't have that kind of time anymore (I'm 70; every moment is precious). I love this. Thanks!
Don't fret - they get almost no income from Rumble. Not much from YT as many get demonetized for one reason or another. Join us over at Bill's site as a member and you can partake of the comments/member blog/ and Forum over there.
@@ronswansonsalterego8533 I already am a member, thanks. Not everyone can afford membership fees for the sites they like but I do what I can. The Blaze is also a good site to join and support.
@@annademo Yep, I always wanted to join Blaze, but I have Bill and one other. That's pretty much all I can justify.
Saw it on R left a thumbs up there and here.
Bill finally plugged his mic in all the way
On my way there now!
Glad you linked to this one!
I am delighted you are doing this. Like Salty Cracker, you are taking viewers away from youtube and sending them over to other platforms. Nice work. Very well done. Keep up the Gud work.
I’m seriously tired of medical labels being used in place of ‘consequences of your bad decisions’, ‘entitled’, or even spiritual issues. I have spoken with a Doctor, mental health therapist, the Director of a large psychiatric unit at a hospital. I asked them all the same question:
“How do you dx mental disorders, including schizophrenic, psychopathic, bi-polar disorder?”
All answers were the same
“We do blood work, X-rays, ct scans, mri’s. If we find nothing physical, we then dx.”
My response:
“Ok. So. They are considered ‘chemical imbalances’, correct?
Responses were all the same:
“Yes”
Question:
So. The blood work shows what chemicals they are missing, or that are low/too high, right?”
Answer:
“No”.
Question:
“Then how do you diagnose?”
Same answer from all 3;
We observe their behavior to determine in which category the patient falls.”
My statement to them;
So. What you are telling me is that the medical establishment has placed a medical diagnosis on a spiritual problem.”
The psych unit director and the therapist (I spoke with these three people at three different times) looked at me like they had been hit by a truck…..or better yet ….. by the truth.
The doctor I asked a separate question before I made the last statement. (Both the doctor and the psych director were friends of mine)
I asked the doctor “What is YOUR take on psychological problems?”
His answer threw me for a loop, because it was the conclusion I had already come to when I spoke with the therapist and director)
His answer? He said “If I said this in front of my colleagues, or if this statement leaves this room with my name attached, I would be laughed out of my profession. But, in my opinion, it is a spiritual issue.”
I had a brother with well-known spiritual issues. But the medical community finally gave him his crutch to lean on. “it’s medical!! It’s not your fault!! You can’t help it!”
I have no doubt emotional issues from bad parenting, over-indulgence by parents, sex abuse…….all kinds of reasons, can cause issues. But they are NOT medical. They are emotional. And as long as the ‘medical’ (ha!) establishment can push a drug as the answer…….they. will. do. so.
Emotions should be dealt with as a spiritual issue. Emotions are ReAl, but they are Not TRUTH.
Well said! 100%. And well done for making the point by asking "the medical professionals " the revealing questions.
Thank you for bringing us to Rumble, it’s better for actually hearing what you think.
A worthy topic and one in various forms is being addressed even on this platform. Here's to hoping we can get back to a mutual concern for human rights instead of divided groups as property.
Let them fight
comment for the algorithms!
That’s why it’s called Y⛔️⛔️ CH⛔️⛔️B !!!
Thanks
Watched it and thanks. Another dumpster fire lit by the democRats. God bless you guys.
Good on the LGB community for calling out this BS, and good on you guys for shining a light on it.FYT and JB 2!!!!
When all the gay marriage issue hit the fan I was lamenting it on FB.. My gay cousin sent me a PM criticizing me for my position. My rejoinder to him was that myself and many of my Christian saw this as getting the foot in the door to normalizing adult/child sexual relationships. His reply was that there were laws against such things and it would never happen.. Wasn't two weeks after I saw a member of NAMBLA coming out and saying it was time to normalize those relationships. So there you have it.. We were right all along.
I was just talking to my kids on that, as they wanted to understand what I had meant on the importance of not changing the definition of any term. They basically disagreed, saying, as proof, that SSM had had no slippery slope. I pointed out a bit, and they just were astonished that I thought these things were happening. I'm praying for them (all are adults)
Your freaking Marriage rights are why little girls get groomed every day trained that older men will take care of them.
That is a pretty STUPID statement isn't it?
My rights and behavior are mine, NIT other people's behavior and actions.
You want your rights based on what some other Idiot did with his freedom? Shall we demonize you because one of your "kind" was caught harming someone?
Not long before gay marriage was legalized there were people who said, "there were laws against such things and it would never happen" about GAY MARRIAGE. It's why a few years before the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage they struck down anti-sodomy laws first. Now you're reading articles about "M.A.P"s (minor attracted persons) that use EXACTLY THE SAME wording and logic you can go back and see in early 1970s when the psychology associations removed homosexuality from their official lists of psychological disorders (we need to "remove the stigma", "it's an innate attraction", "it's an alternate lifestyle").
The Gay Rights lobby has spent the last FIFTY years trying to deny the idea that gays are MADE that way by environmental factors in their life and upbringing and replace it with the idea that homosexuality is a natural inborn trait. And now the advocates of the Trans movement have re-opened the whole idea that LGBT people are MADE that way by groomers exposing kids to these ideas and "lifestyles" at an early age, finding and targeting vulnerable kids and getting them to buy in to those ideas and lifestyles.
They're so obviously insane it threatens the whole attempt to normalize perversion by revealing how perverse it all really is.
@@liljenborg2517 and in 2008, obama and hilary clarified they supported DOMA, then said nothing more about it. In 2012 he and holder ANNOUNCED (unconstitutionally) they would not uphold it and wrote letters to schools essentially threatening lawsuits if they did not allow boys wanting to go into girls changing rooms to go.
@@cyndwinzeler3417 incorrect
You fixed your Mike!!
And add the P
How about drop ALL of them, since they are ALL deviant sexual behaviors? How bizarre to see one group of people practicing sexual deviancy now condemning a different group of people practicing sexual deviancy. Will Scott speak out on that? He's a follower of Christ, so I hope he does.
I am ALSO a follower of Christ, have been for over 50 years, and I WILL speak out about it:
Sin is sin. And we are ALL sinners, you, me, the Pope, Billy Graham.....ALL of us! But we as CHRISTIANS are SUPPOSED to be trying to root sin OUT of our lives. So it's fair to expect CHRISTIANS to behave like Christians. And if you, as a Christian want to cut ties and ditch relationships with non-Christians because they don't ACT like Christians, that's your prerogative. But if you DO that, HOW are you going to be able to follow the Great Commission? You can't lead people to Christ if you refuse to associate with them just because they're sinners.
Even Jesus didn't condemn the woman brought to him that had been caught in adultery. He told her she should stop sinning, but He DIDN'T condemn her for it, despite the fact that He was the ONLY one that WAS without sin, and therefore qualified TO condemn her. He spent his time interacting with harlots, tax collector's, and OTHER sinners the Pharisees and Sadducees avoided like the plague. And called the Pharisees and Sadducees, who followed every jot and tittle of the law, but had corrupt hearts; whitewashed tombs full of dead men's bones.
Are we supposed to condone their sin? Of COURSE not. But there's a MAJOR difference between condemning SIN and condemning SINNERS. As Christians we're God's ambassador to the world. It's NOT an ambassador's job to isolate themself in the embassy and never interact with the locals. And if they DO so, they're letting their Sovereign down, and neglecting their primary JOB.
NO ONE wants to join a group that treats them like a PARIAH. But NEITHER can we allow THEIR sin to become OUR sin, or WORSE our CHILDREN'S sin. Therefore, interacting with SINNERS is necessary, but participating in or condoning their SIN is prohibited. I understand that SOME behaviors can be too tempting to allow yourself to be exposed to, and that's FINE, avoid those situations.
The best rule of thumb is to examine your dynamic with the person in question. If YOU are a good influence on THEM, then it's a relationship you should continue. But if THEY are a bad influence on YOU, THAT'S a relationship that needs to END. And above ALL, PRAY about it, ESPECIALLY if you're unsure whether it's a positive or negative relationship.
And you probably already know, but just for the record; ALL interactions with others are a relationship of SOME kind. By relationship I don't NECESSARILY mean romantic relationship. It COULD be that, or it could be a relationship with a friend, coworker, boss, acquaintance, relative, roommate, teacher, student, doctor.....or ANYONE you interact with more than once.
@@juliebaker6969
"And if you, as a Christian want to cut ties and ditch relationships with non-Christians because they don't ACT like Christians, that's your prerogative."
Where did I say anything about "cutting ties" and "ditching relationships with non-Christians because they don't ACT like Christians"? Don't put words in my mouth. Thank you.
@@Yesica1993 You put the words in your OWN mouth.
Quote- "How about drop ALL of them, since they are ALL deviant sexual behaviors?"
He does speak out against it! I'm glad he always brings his Christian perspective and that Bill and Steve always respect it.
Of course there is no answer. (Because you know I said no such thing.)
Great
I won't be cheering for either side in this cat fight.
On my way over to a free speech venue!😀
Not surprisingly, you have moved this (not actually) controversial topic to an actual free speech platform and opened with - your LGB bonifides 🤔 .. Whew! Now that we know you're allies, we as the audience will know how to react 😐
Better yet, drop the "T" with the y in front of it🤔
- Reality: All of these special letters are a description of mental illness. The handbook called them such just a handful of years ago and only shuffled the language due to mob pushback not science.
- On the other hand, Christianity teaches that we must show compassion especially to the afflicted because "the doctor seeks out primarily the sick". (agree with Scott Ott completely)
- Politically, the only block of people that should be recognized are individuals. Retire the Civil Rights Act because it is no longer needed. All constituents should be viewed primarly as citizens with 'equal protection under the law' and not war tribes fighting to carve out power for their side. At least the federal government needs to stay almost completely out of people's private affairs and homes and if an antisocial behavior is worth recognition by law it should be handled by family, community, local government, or state government in that respective order.
I have long said the dumbest thing the alphabet crew did was add the T...
Drop the,T, now watch them, that they don't add P.
Cuz P really wants in on the ride.
Or they will rebrand P, as persons atracted to youth. AS if that were normal. The new NORMAL.
lol
#LGB-T
✝️🛐⚛️💜🙏💜
Sorry… it’s a topic I couldn’t care less about. 🤷🏻♂️
The correct name of the RUclips website should be "Youshallobeyustube"