RUclips is flooded with cubing content these days. That said, I think you’re videos and breakdowns are wonderfully watchable. I really believe that you are making top tier content and are forging the way for the next generation through the YouCube slog. Thank you and keep up the great work!
That solve was close enough to perfection and hooray for great cameras to show us every beautiful millisecond of it in all its glory! PS: I need to get me one of those sub 4 trees.
Man, I really thought you were gonna make a YT short about the solution, but as we can see right now, you made a whole video elaborating on the topic. You have a real potential to become a....... idk but u really have a potential.
@@STUCUBE I still remember the old times when Dylan used to consistently make videos like this. However, you've really made up for it and, honestly, made even more for it.
It’s an interesting debate for sure. What if I inserted the pair normally and got eo then got did a coll and got a “pll skip” that was technically a zb?
What I meant was, you showed a person using a ZB method, it's a full step solution for her. I'd argue further. Even if you know only a subset of ZBLLs, like a U set, I'd still call a solve with such U case a full step one. Why? Because in that solve you covered every step of that branch of your method. However, if you had a Sune case for example, and you don't know all the Sune ZBLLs, but you happened to have a cube solved after doing a Sune, that would mean a PLL skip and not a full step solve.
Great accomplishment from tymon, but it won't be long before yiheng is comfortably colour neutral and learns zb, pulling sub-4s every few comps haha. There's vidoes of him doing full T ZB and one looking f2l on orange cross (which could be worth making a video about?)
@@STUCUBE i think youtube deleted my comment when I replied with the link but the videos are by @justwe-kg8vp and can be found with a search on youtube. Astonishing how these videos aren't receiving any attention on youtube lol
Thanks for the link. Yeah that’s really odd I haven’t seen this at all, especially the zbll one that was 3 weeks ago. I might actually talk about this, thanks for letting me know!
I think to say 6 year olds will never get a full step CFOP solve it correct, but technically it’s a full step ZB solve, so they do get full step solves
I think it’s interesting to see what people define as full step. For example, I could get eo by inserting the pair normally and then do a coll and get a “pll skip” and it would technically count as fullstep
I think it probably would’ve been about the same time with the forced eo, because he was most likely able to predict the oll during f2l and the pll during oll, and even if he recognized forced eo in inspection (which he could’ve done if he could’ve predicted the last pair being 2 gen) he still would’ve had a pause in ll (and it might even be slower if he tried to force eo without inspection help) Edit: yes I did make this comment before finishing the video
I think this is the first time you've actually put a real saying in the desc fr. Is that true?? And I really want to know what is the click-through rate of your videos. I hope you reply
tbf getting high tps with roux isnt just a question of getting better with M moves, there're worse blind spots and weird ergonomics on f2b woulda been cool, but thats just what you have to sacrifice when you want good efficiency in your method.
How fast would this solve have been if he did the alternate solution? ⬇️
3.24
slower as he himself said
In 7:30 youre wrong i think in 2 months yiheng will use 1 Look last layer
SUB 3.13
Like 2,97 or smth
RUclips is flooded with cubing content these days. That said, I think you’re videos and breakdowns are wonderfully watchable. I really believe that you are making top tier content and are forging the way for the next generation through the YouCube slog. Thank you and keep up the great work!
I really appreciate that! Thank you 🙏
thank the youtube algorithm too
@@christopher_campbell
RUclips algorithm = the people
Thank the people/viewers
Tymon is honestly an efficiency genius. He gets insane times on standard scrambles
Tymon is the man, STU is the man too
hopefully that rhymes
Feliks' 4.73 WR back in the day was fullstep as well which is awesome
"just because hes tymon of course he can track like 12 different pieces at once in inspection"😂😂
STU is the Gen-Z version of Jperm
no, hes better
That solve was close enough to perfection and hooray for great cameras to show us every beautiful millisecond of it in all its glory! PS: I need to get me one of those sub 4 trees.
Now YiHeng has the fastest full step solve (3.47, and yes, he tied with YuSheng).
I saw that. Absolutely insane, gotta make a video on that for sure
Cool vid!
Just a little precision, all zbll can be 2 side reco if you have the co (like pll)
“It’s still a PLL skip.”
- Lucas Etter
Your channel is one of the best on RUclips. Your videos are very entertaining as well as useful to help me improve. Keep it up!
Thank you!
Man, I really thought you were gonna make a YT short about the solution, but as we can see right now, you made a whole video elaborating on the topic. You have a real potential to become a....... idk but u really have a potential.
wat u liked the comment in just 20 s wat ohk
Thanks! I prefer making long form videos, especially when something like this happens. Allows for more detail and is just more interesting in general
@@STUCUBE True, it's really interesting
@@STUCUBE I still remember the old times when Dylan used to consistently make videos like this. However, you've really made up for it and, honestly, made even more for it.
ZBLS and ZBLL are steps of the ZB method, so it is full step.
It’s an interesting debate for sure. What if I inserted the pair normally and got eo then got did a coll and got a “pll skip” that was technically a zb?
@@STUCUBE I think it has to depend on the person who does, I would say the solve is full-step if the person knows all the ZB for that oll case
What I meant was, you showed a person using a ZB method, it's a full step solution for her.
I'd argue further. Even if you know only a subset of ZBLLs, like a U set, I'd still call a solve with such U case a full step one. Why? Because in that solve you covered every step of that branch of your method.
However, if you had a Sune case for example, and you don't know all the Sune ZBLLs, but you happened to have a cube solved after doing a Sune, that would mean a PLL skip and not a full step solve.
Tymon go for the wr
Tymon is built different fr
I really like your editing
Appreciate it bro! Means a lot!
This is very interesting, cubing has come so far.
I got this scramble at Melbourne Summer, and got a DNF 11, i found an XCross but failed to execute it.
Great accomplishment from tymon, but it won't be long before yiheng is comfortably colour neutral and learns zb, pulling sub-4s every few comps haha. There's vidoes of him doing full T ZB and one looking f2l on orange cross (which could be worth making a video about?)
Wow, I didn’t know about that. Do you have a link or somewhere I can see this? That’s really interesting
@@STUCUBEruclips.net/video/xdYb8nEYM7I/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/oxpuYAdh4O8/видео.html
@@STUCUBE i think youtube deleted my comment when I replied with the link but the videos are by @justwe-kg8vp and can be found with a search on youtube. Astonishing how these videos aren't receiving any attention on youtube lol
Thanks for the link. Yeah that’s really odd I haven’t seen this at all, especially the zbll one that was 3 weeks ago. I might actually talk about this, thanks for letting me know!
0:45 It's not as old but you should have replaced this with Sebastian Weyer's 21.97 4x4 record... lol
Tried to zoom in it was literally just one orange pixel haha
yay
Discussion+recon=w content
Was there as my son was competing......was cool to see him break the record
hey man love your videos, just a question though, how do you know what solution people do?
Thanks! I found this reconstruction at reco.nz
@@STUCUBE thanks
Lucas will never live that down.
I think to say 6 year olds will never get a full step CFOP solve it correct, but technically it’s a full step ZB solve, so they do get full step solves
I think it’s interesting to see what people define as full step. For example, I could get eo by inserting the pair normally and then do a coll and get a “pll skip” and it would technically count as fullstep
tymon said that zb would probably be slower for him
I think it probably would’ve been about the same time with the forced eo, because he was most likely able to predict the oll during f2l and the pll during oll, and even if he recognized forced eo in inspection (which he could’ve done if he could’ve predicted the last pair being 2 gen) he still would’ve had a pause in ll (and it might even be slower if he tried to force eo without inspection help)
Edit: yes I did make this comment before finishing the video
Stu on his way to make our day with his new videos 🗣️🔥🔥🔥
amazing content as alwayss ❤
does he use gan or 12? just curious
14 or 12
Thank you! And yes, he uses the Gan 12 at the moment
You should make a video about Matty’s 5.33 avg with a mid and high 4 counting and high 6
Please make a video about Kim Rogers new CR OH
its the first ER since the last ER where I wasn't the judge
Yiheng shaking rn
0:55 yiheng wang 3.38 now
I think this is the first time you've actually put a real saying in the desc fr. Is that true?? And I really want to know what is the click-through rate of your videos. I hope you reply
I think I’ve quoted myself before, but besides that probably yeah 😅 good CTR for me is like 9-10%
@@STUCUBE OK lol 😅. Thanks for replying
3.47 (not WR): am i a joke to you
one of the advantages of living in POOland
No dissing poland
helo
4th
45 moves (Roux Move Count) with 12 TPS (Fast CFOP TPS), Is just overpowered.
tbf getting high tps with roux isnt just a question of getting better with M moves, there're worse blind spots and weird ergonomics on f2b
woulda been cool, but thats just what you have to sacrifice when you want good efficiency in your method.