Is this the Beginning of the End of the US-Israel Relationship?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 апр 2024
- Sign up to Brilliant (the first 200 sign ups get 20% off an annual premium subscription): brilliant.org/tldr/
On Monday, the UN Security Council adopted a resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza, after the US dropped its veto and abstained instead. In this video, we take a look what this vote actually means and what impact it could have on the US-Israel relationship.
🎞 TikTok: / tldrnews
💡 Got a Topic Suggestion? - forms.gle/mahEFmsW1yGTNEYXA
Support TLDR on Patreon: / tldrnews
Donate by PayPal: tldrnews.co.uk/funding
Our mission is to explain news and politics in an impartial, efficient, and accessible way, balancing import and interest while fostering independent thought.
TLDR is a completely independent & privately owned media company that's not afraid to tackle the issues we think are most important. The channel is run by a small group of young people, with us hoping to pass on our enthusiasm for politics to other young people. We are primarily fan sourced with most of our funding coming from donations and ad revenue. No shady corporations, no one telling us what to say. We can't wait to grow further and help more people get informed. Help support us by subscribing, engaging and sharing. Thanks!
//////////////////////
1 - www.timesofisrael.com/hamas-p...
1 - www.reuters.com/world/middle-...
2 - edition.cnn.com/2024/03/25/mi...
3 - www.ochaopt.org/content/hosti...
4 - www.redcross.org.uk/stories/d...
5 - il.usembassy.gov/u-s-abstenti...
6 - edition.cnn.com/2024/03/25/mi...
7 - antonioguterres/s...
8 - www.reuters.com/world/middle-...
9 - www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-r...
10 - www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...
11 - www.forbes.com/sites/anafaguy...
12 - abcnews.go.com/Politics/harri...
00:00 - Introduction
00:57 - Ceasefire Resolution
04:14 - Why Did the US Drop its Veto?
06:05 - What Happens Next?
06:49 - Impact on the US-Israel Relationship
08:57 - Sponsored Content
Short answer:
*NO.*
it was only theatrical
I think america fine with the invasion, just not with the whole invasion thing with rafah. and also the facts and reports coming out of Palestine isn't helping
I do believe this is definitely the biggest show of the US basically telling Israel to chill unless they want the US to no longer back them up, and honestly if Israel were to push it too far I believe that US intervention against Israel shouldn't be off the table, Israel is so far doing more damage to the region than anyone else at the moment, the current Israeli administration has done more to damage Israeli-Palestinian relations, and has continuously said they do not wish to implement a real two state solution.
We also shouldn't forget about all the times that they have been asked by the international community to stop the settlers in the West Bank.
Yep in the recent budget bill it has a part that take funding from the pasastinian authority if they pursue international lawsuits against Israel. And they are withholding aid from gaza through 2025. While still sending weapons... Definitely not stopping there support for genocide yet unfortunately.
@@dannydenison6253why is it so fucking hard for people to be a true pacifist??
Israel and the US are and always will be allies. Israel is Americas greatest ally. Without Israel there is no America and without America there is no Israel. America will never abandon a friend!
I would say it's the end of Netanyahu's government, not the US-Israel relationship.
As an Israeli citizen I certainly hope so
its irrelevant to Netanyahu. Its essentially Hamas narative being adopted by West countries
@@diodotos it is the international narrative being accepted by the US. Notice that 14/15 nations on the UNSC accepted it not all of them "western".
unarmed? you are delusional. Its all nice and well to write catchy phrases that mean nothing. The reality is terrorists are hiding behind civilians fully armed@@africacan
I did not say only west accepted it. You expect Islamofascism like Iran to support that narative but not states that are actually targets of islamofascists@@threecards333
I remember a time when us recruited 40+ countries to invade a nation with heaviest sanctions ever because “they didn’t obey security council resolutions & international law😂”.
Is it IRAQ ?
@@MarK94827 because those are unfair borders genius, maybe use your brain and give the original owners more than 25% of the land, and then don't colonize the land they do have
thats exactly the point , the only teeth the UN has is from other States , and i doubt one state in the world would agree to invade israel because of palestinians , sad truth is nobody cares about the innocent
@@adamelghalmi9771 "unfair borders" Israel did not request the Arab coalitions to attack it on 2 separate occasions now did it? Arabs lost land because of their own actions so what's this crying about "unfair"? Know what's unfair? Being ganged up by multiple countries because they don't like Jews and want them all gone.
@@adamelghalmi9771
And those borders on these agreements are this incredibly unfair because they didnt even attend the negotiations and often just declared a war which they subsequently kept losing.
Making Israeli demands larger and larger.. If you refuse to attend negotiations.. Dont be suprised when in the end decisions are made without you.
Simple as that.
@@MarK94827so your position now is that israel’s acting the same way as a US-recognized terrorist organization, and you don’t see any problem with that
Who remembers when countries were invaded for ignoring Security Council Resolutions?
So you’re in favor of invading countries interesting
The US should stop bribing Israelis neighbors not to invade them
Has that ever happened? I'm curious, no irony. Any example?
@@TheRicardfranca89iraq
@@TheRicardfranca89 Iraq when George the Ist invaded
Huh? The end? Didn't they just give them $3 billion?
It's all just a show.
Hamas got $30 billion from Qatar!
@@ameyas7726 They get $30 million per month...
@@ameyas7726if what you were saying is true trust Palestine would be free, open your eyes not even Egypt spends that much on defence for 7.5 years
(4 billion for defence annually)
Mmm. This is false.
Qatar has been funding 30 MILLION, not billion, dollars to GAZA, not Hamas. Now... Naturally, Hamas is probably stealing some or most of the money. That said, our efforts of helping the poor should not stop because there are criminals in the way.@@ameyas7726
in war there is no winner but victims especially the civilians
there is a winner, its corporations that produce weaponry and sell it for profit, their advertisements include pro war sentiment
might wanna reword this lmao 😂
That's what irks me about Netanyahu's comments about how voting for a ceasefire means you want Hamas to win. Nobody can win this war, the ceasefire is just to say "stop" (especially to the IDF).
@@zUJ7EjVDNeither side truly wants to stop tho, theres centuries old blood libel on both sides that the 2 ways this ends is 1 side gets genocided or the whole territory gets taken over a whole 3rd party
@@danielkells6021 While neither side wants to stop, only one side can stop. And honestly the state of Israel should probably not exist bar an area the size of the Gaza Strip centered on Tel Aviv. My stance is that as long as Israel exists Palestinians will never be safe.
The fact that the Israeli representative is on his phone during the vote 2:00 shows that they don't give a damn about these resolutions.
Their citizen's lives are of greater consequence.
The world is crazy and hateful on the subject of Israel.
that's the message that the UN needs to receive
As they should. I'm sure that the representatives don't have their less than a year old toddlers, over 80 years old, female who are being raped repeatedly - captives in captivity.
Nicely caught
US abstained for..."immediate and unconditional release of all hostages"
Netanyahu: How dare you 😡
The US abstained because it wanted the resolution to make both parties obligations dependent on one another such that neither party violated the resolution if the other party did not comply. The US offered a resolution with that language. The Security Council instead opted for a resolution with independent obligations. Under the resolution, Israel violates the resolution if it does not cease fire no matter what Hamas does. That is why the US abstained.
The problem is that the resolution does not condition a ceasefire on the release of hostages. According to the resolution, even if Hamas chooses not to release the hostages, Israel is still legally obligated to pause the war. I am also outraged, even if I hate Netanyahu (which is unrelated).
@@Daniel-jv1ku holding two opposing ideas in your mind at the same time, congratulations! ...that capability should not be difficult, but most people can't/won't do it.
@@davidh4374 What do you mean?
@@Daniel-jv1ku you don't like Netanyahu but you can separate that feeling from understanding what's going on here. It feels like a basic skill in abstract thought, but many people can't do that.
No...we just gave them another3.8 billion and say Americans can't criticize Isreal ... Horrific
"gave" been the past tense term you used there......
@@nopants3560 Just in the last week or so...we have already because of Aipac given them 300 billion or did Jeff Epstein have something on some people...
Well with a name like Ruth it's pretty odd to be angry about the whole situation about israel, maybe change it to Fatima
Now you can see how ineffectual the UN. No hostages released, no ceasefire.
The UN's support of Ukraine including the US's certainly has had an effect, although not a good one. imo
Releasing captives without a ceasefire doesn't make sense as three hostages found out when they were almost free only to be cut down by IDF.
@@latetotheparty184wasn't that NATO instead of the UN?
@@mrmr446if there was an offer for a ceasefire and terrorists in jail for all of the remaining hostages, israel would take it, however there is non.
is that the job of UN though? how are they gonna force Hamas to release hostages? specially since Israel has made it clear they don't wanna deal with Hamas in any shape
Netanyahu is an expert at burning bridges.
In this regard Netanyahu is totally right
literally and figuratively
He gained the experience from Nazi Germany who were expert at burning jews... six million of them, that's half the jew population today, no wonder why he developed some form of "envy", being a nazionist jew himself...
That's karma
... and children.
This is why the UN is called the United Nothing.
Why don't they pass a resolution to officially change their name to the WB, or "Why Bother."
Here's my opinion on the UN:
I HATE THE ANTICHRIST
The UN allows countries to express their opinions, but achieves little else.
To be fair, I think the UN having actual power would be much worse, it would be the big government to end all governments.
@@douglasyoole4815 the point of the UN is not to keep peace everywhere, and to make sure there won't be any war anymore. It's to prevent a war between major powers that could degenerate in a nuclear war or a world war, and to create a coordination of countries for eventual international forces of peacekeepers, which sometimes works, sometimes fails. It must also make sure all countries in the world keep an official dialogue line open. The UN has been around for 79 years now, there has not been any world war or nuclear war. I would say it did its job fine.
@@bretonneux3389the real reason the UN exists
At the start of this war I never imagined that Hamas would be so comprehensively successful in achieving its strategic aims. Obviously it’s been a living hell for the actual population of Gaza and the death and human suffering has been horrific. But the outcome has surely been everything the Hamas commanders could have wished for and more
The over-reaction was surely something they hoped for as a limited operation with fewer civilian casualties isn't as useful for propaganda, not sure what you think they have gained apart from attention. No more occupation is surely one of Hamas aims.
@@mrmr446 Hamas is an extreme example of the means justifying the end
It’s obvious though Israel had the morale high ground after Oct 7 but its extreme revenge is what made Hamas win but that’s not true either, if people think Israel just wants to destroy Hamas, they r deeply mistaken, u don’t destroy a idealogy like that, this actually helped it grow, Israel wants to push the Palestinians out of Gaza and West Bank, that’s why on the news they always talks about “why don’t these Arab governments take these Palestinians in” they wanna make Gaza a living hell and then their ganna do the same to the West Bank
@@muksimulmaad7413 and it's working innit? they've now got a while recruitable population in gaza and then hundreds of millions supporting them
@@mrmr446 Hamas wanted to turn the world against Israel (and rightly so). They achieved this, notwithstanding the US which is still on the fence.
The IJC should order the United States to end its embargo on Cuba and to take measures to increases humanitarian aid to the island. For the first time ever, the Cuban government asked the United Nations for help: The island nation is going through a serious food shortage right now and also experiencing rolling blackouts. Among continued US restrictions, falling domestic production, and a weak tourism industry,
Looks like the US takeaway from the israel conflict and so many others, that getting involved is a mistake. There is no right step, too many tiny countries with big egos that get together and blame the US for every issue they have. Cuba will be left out until they take the vietnam route and elect to actually function in international trade. Its not that hard to get tourism going in the caribbean, but you cant be hardline anything. The loss of one trade partner was not the death of cuba. It was really fckin dumb for a tiny nation to point wmds at a superpower, and thats a good lesson for the 21st century that theyre still learning, and obviously havent yet. Also a good indicator of the pure incompetence of that government.
If countries are unified when they act, they are unified. We have this huge problem with looking at some countries like the US or germany as a monolith, but we can understand that there are actual people in places like gaza, not just a government. It needs to be one or the other, and it will eventually fall again back to the norm, that yes, effectively governments speak for the people. Israels just this big monster but palestinians are not responsible for hamas actions, actually laughable really. Its quite clear they feel israeli citizens are culpable to government action.
End all be all is everyone likes us more and the citizenry are happier when the US is isolationist, and cuba will fall when its good and ready, as it should. Embargoes are the most peaceful and morally good way we have to solve the problem of upstart extremists, and we should not eschew them. We should not pay for life support to a country that nearly facilitated nuclear holocaust. Since we do collective punishment now apparently, cubas shot. Offering aid right now would just be propping up a bad government. Same with haiti. The track record of intervention is just more human rights abuses, nations need to be allowed to work themselves out. Weve been intervening for years, nothing gets better in haiti.
What is Even the point of the blockade RN the USSR Is dead
The whole situation is just a shit show, they are all bad, there are no winners.
The arms manufacturers are winning.
Lockheed Martin: stonks
Islamic and jewish extremists are kind of winners of this. Sadly the conflict will keep scaling.
Who are bad? The innocent families who just want to be left alone to live in peace without being under occupation. I'm sure if you lived under it, you would feel what they feel.
we celebrate the cease-fire
Isn't it glaringly weird that the most powerful nation in the world gets snubbed by a small dependent nation? 😂
The tail is wagging the dog.
AIPAC $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Votes. Too many of those people in America.
Israel used to be the puppet of the USA, not anymore
@@mr.x817the crazy thing is, there really aren’t a lot of Jews/Israelis in the States or anywhere for that matter. Their money gives them a ton of lobbying power. It’s not their numbers relative to population.
"We will send... a strongly worded letter demanding they stop."
- UN security council probably
6:26 Antonio Gutierrez is the secretary general, not the security general
The American "efforts" to restrain Israel are largely superficial; they're still sending them ammo by the boatload. Until that stops, there's no point in any of these other shenanigans.
No.
Remind me who provides Israel the weapons?
Hamas and Iran won, because they stopped the Arab-Israeli normalization protests. Hamas was committing terrorist attacks targeting civilians during the Oslo accords as well, to disrupt the peace negotiation process
"Before it is destroyed, Israel must be humiliated first" - Hamas leader Ismail Hanieh
Conviently forgot to mention Russia tried to add the word PERMANENT ceasefire and the us vetoed it🤡
God bless us
What about a Ukraine war cease fire? No way we’re giving Russia the moral rughts on ceasefires hahaha
@@adamolition8702nations will naturally want ceasefires if they have nothing to gain or lose from it.
Permanent ceasefire that leaves Hamas in control would be some clown shit I agree
@@adamolition8702seriously? Who cares abput geopolitics in this situation. We are talking about the potential deaths of 2 million people.
One can hope.
Too little too late.
It's never late
@@ceosgamer016_5 for those people who die of starvation today, it is too late.
Better late than never
Is it just me or are there sound fluctuations with this video
Just you. Or maybe I'm confused because you clearly have a lot of likes meqning others agree with you
@@stamzthehuman897 You can be both correct. "Likes" is very unreliable metric how to judge something, it shows whats popular, not whats correct - visible in politics as well. For example i didnt noticed any audio fluctuations, than i did read this comment and put my earbuds on. At that point i noticed slight fluctuations.
Yeah but what does it mean? Can somebody explain me please?
Now that's all I'm listening for
There always are. He's rocking back and forth in his chair as he records.
While I don't think this will change much for the elections, it would be interesting to see what would happen if the Biden administration entirely turns away from Israel in the upcoming months
From what I've seen, Biden lost a lot of support from Arabs and young progressives because of his stance on this war, and it seemed like Trump had a better chance at winning for this reason as well (there are obviously other reasons too, but safe to say, Biden's weird, supportive yet still undecisive stance on this war didn't please anyone). While most Arabs and progressives still wouldn't vote for Trump, he had a huge chance at campaigning for "restoring peace", given how people were already pretty terrified of the current wars in the world, and many blamed Biden's inefficiency because of this. While people knew that Trump was definitely pro-Israel, there was a chance that he would at least be better at attempting to create peace in the region, and put an end to the war, especially since most people remember the Trump administration as more peaceful for the world.
This however, could change a lot. While I imagine most Palestine supporters are still dissatisfied with Biden and will never forget how much he aided Israel before this, they most likely still realise that Trump is definitely more pro-Israel than he is. People who wouldn't vote for anyone because they really hated Trump yet were also angry at Biden due to his support for Israel might reconsider their stance because even though Biden also did a LOT of pro-Israel things, he at least put some sort of pressure on Israel, which might not be much, but if you remember just how much the far-right (and most of the right in general) is friendly with Netanyahu and how close he and Trump was, there is a high chance that Trump would be a lot more supportive of Israel if he became president.
And this is not even mentioning the obvious fact that Trump has a huge backing from evangelicals and other really conservative people who strongly back Israel for religious reasons. He has a chance to criticize and bash Biden for turning away from, Israel and promise that he would be a lot more supportive in order to consolidate this part of his fanbase. This seems like a golden chance for him, however, if he does this, he will no doubt alienate any sort of pro-Palestine person who would have voted for him (or simply would skip the vote) out of necessity or to "show Biden". So if Biden continues this, he has a chance of winning back some disappointed progressives (who would still only vote him out of necessity, because they see Trump as worse, but still).
The Muslims and the far left are wrong. They are the weird ones and should not be catered to. That’s where you got it wrong.
He would most likely loose some of the moderate votes and definitely the Jewish progressives. Swing states with large Jewish populations, e.g., Pennsylvania where Biden won by 80k votes has 400k Jews, Arizona and Georgia where Biden won by 10K votes have ~140k Jews each, etc.
You are basing this off of stuff you read on Social Media, which means nothing in the real world. Biden's poll numbers are actually up and his average is ahead of Trump's for the first time in months. Trump has no shot at winning, the GOP might have been able to win this year if they were a serious political party but of course we all know that they are not.
You seem to have a good understand of the situation.
Personally, I would hate to see Trump win but, at this point... if I have to choose between the well-being of America VS the survival of Israel, I'm gonna choose the survival of Israel. I'm Jewish. I have voted for anti-Israel candidates. I disagreed with their anti-Israel views but I sucked it up and voted for them because I believed that they would do good domestic politics. But there's a red line. If I sense that Israel's existence is threatened, even if the actual doomsday will only come in 1 to 3 decades, I'm gonna say "screw it" and vote based on my ethnicity, not based on my citizenship.
Democrats get something like 75% of the Jewish vote. Had that gone the other way in the last election Georgia and Arizona would have given Trump the win. If Biden loses the Jewish vote but gets more Arab and "progressive" votes, what Trump states does he flip? None.
hope so
“Security General”? 😂
Nothing has changed
Only 2 weeks left of Ramadan
🥓
Just a PR deal for Biden
And?
@@First-Name--Last-Namepork chops are better than bacon
@@First-Name--Last-Name that is SOOOOO offensive 😲 how could you 😭
Can’t a multinational coalition take care of hamas if they don’t want Israel taking care of it? From one side Israel has to take out hamas from the other side the international community don’t want innocent lives be spilled. An international coalition of armed forces and political pressure should do it. It seems like with this resolution the international community wants their cake and eat it too. Just beautiful words but none of the commitment
no, human life costs with a coalition would be equally, if not more costly with a coalition, israel is a modern military that uses dirty strategies, like the mongolians. if you destroy the population, people tend to stop fighting you. its goes like this: surrender, you live. dont, your city gets razed and its population genocided
I can't imagine any country that would voluntarily raise their hand for that. For many countries the actions of Hamas were cruel and indefensible but necessary, most western countries would never be able to fathom going to war without the US taking the lead, and the last thing the US wants is to get into another war in the middle east. Not to mention the country needs the trust of the international community, and sufficient money for the operation. There are basically no countries that can take on the role.
Why do so many people fail to see you can't 'take care' of Hamas, you can supress them for a decade or two but as long as the conditions that gave rise to Hamas don't change they'll just keep popping up. We took care of the Taliban how many times now? Either Israel stops treating Palistinians as 3rd class citizens and follows the plan set out in the camp david accords or they kill/deport all Palistinians.
@@zUJ7EjVD US Delta force is on the ground with IDF. The US navy is also there. US military intelligence is providing support. Palestinians will rightly identify US as a bad actor & wouldn’t want them there. Better to US to bankroll the countries are acceptable & willing to support the mission.
Yes and the coalition should also remove those illegal setlers in west bank too
Algeria did a huge job in the security council. Thank you Algeria ❤
Free Kabylia
@@user-iz2tq3dx5d
bruh the kabylia are a part of Algeria and they get the same rights as all other Algerians.....we are not a racist state like isreal
yes sureSuppression of Berber culture in favor of Arabization is not consider an oppression @@user-rl8hf8kt1r
@@user-rl8hf8kt1roh idk about that im pretty sure they are discrimination against especially their language by arab supremacists in the government and population so stop acting all holy and clean 😂 just look at how they are killing their language
@@user-rl8hf8kt1r 🤣
somehow your words are not convincing.
Sudanese watching gaza get all the attention: 👁️👄👁️
And whose fault is that?
@@tauhidershadKUFNAFLORAN the Arab lobby
Not many people know but there's also Yemen and Iraq
If that intresets you give it a quick search
there is no arab lobby, also sudan is also arab@@user-iz2tq3dx5d
1) More people are being killed in Gaza
2) People in Western countries care more because Western governments are directly funding Israel's atrocities in Gaza. Not comparable with Sudan here
People seem to forget that there are other humans in Israel besides Netanyahu, and that all the geopolitical reasons to be allies remain in place, with or without him.
Hamas and Iran won, because they stopped the Arab-Israeli normalization protests. Hamas was committing terrorist attacks targeting civilians during the Oslo accords as well, to disrupt the peace negotiation process
"Before it is destroyed, Israel must be humiliated first" - Hamas leader Ismail Hanieh
I'd argue the geopolitical reasons are weaker than ever. Israel is going to have to reign itself in. Now that it's in the spotlight, the west won't stand for it's behavior for much longer.
They don't forget, they just want to support Hamas' views and actions
@@diurpaneustv2166 Yea their public statements and actions really handicap the people in the comment section trying to use victim mentality as a shield.
@@diurpaneustv2166 Disrupted, but I doubt stopped. Iran is too much of a threat to the Saudis to not ally in the end.
This still doesnt change the fact that there are 48 million kangaroos in australia and 3 million people in Uruguay
So if all the kangaroos came to Uruguay, every person would have to fight 16 kangaroos
😂😂😂😂 that would be insane
Nah, I'd win.
Would pay to watch that
You do bring up some great points. What would the average Uruguayan do if 16 kangaroos came after them? That certainly is an issue that should be considered and addressed by Uruguay's MDN for the continued safety of their civilians.
Source ???
Ditch it
Interesting how israel can just easily ignore the US and the UN without consequences isnt it?
interesting how hamas does that as well without consequences isnt it? release the hostages, get ceasefire, it is as simple as that.
@@boobdu110 let me guess, you think it started on Oct 7th? Keep showing how you're historically illiterate
@@boobdu110 and let me guess, it all started on the 7th? Perhaps you should consider learning history. This issue has been there long before that and the oppression runs deeps.
@@infinitebeast5517 i love how strangers on the internet are all well educated and suggest others to educte themselves.
Oppression runs deep indeed, but hate is deeper. Its pretty stupid not to oppress a terrorist group that wants you to die. How would you solve the peoblem then? Except israelis leaving israel? You think giving a palestinian state to the palestinians will suddenly make hamas be happy and friendly?
@@boobdu110lemme guess you think occupying people’s lives,land,killing them and treating them like second class citizens for 75+ years wouldn’t result in oct 7? That’s like kkk members thinking having Jim Crow laws wouldn’t result in the civil rights movement 😂. It’s literally common sense when you do oppression/occupation on other humans they will always resist. If you really care about ur country’s safety then you must advocate for the human rights of everyone that also includes Palestinians
The answer is absolutely NO. Bet some people wished it was but the unfortunate truth for them is that this relationship is far stronger than leaders and governments.
Saw the title, immediate answer: NO
Haven't watched the video yet but my comment to the title... I hope so
Israel has demonstrated how to speedrun losing any goodwill it had remaining.
This is the definition of play stupid games. Win stupid prizes
Edit; Very peaceful replies. My notifications is amazing
That would only be true if the UN were effective at literally anything. Cute story though
Yes, Hamas invaded Israel and took hostages (stupid game), now whining about war they started and Hezbollah not aiding them in fighting Israel (stupid prize)
Most people dying aren't members of hamas
@@mriyoi Israel blocking food & water import to Gaza Strip (stupid game), Hamas invading Israel & a lot of people being against Israel (stupid prize)
some poeple still think it is started on 7th october. no wonder this shit never get done
I take the view that there is no such thing as abstention. If you abstain from a vote, you effectively vote to approve whatever the outcome is.
We won't be so lucky
This is truly embarrassing for the USA
Hamas and Iran won, because they stopped the Arab-Israeli normalization protests. Hamas was committing terrorist attacks targeting civilians during the Oslo accords as well, to disrupt the peace negotiation process
"Before it is destroyed, Israel must be humiliated first" - Hamas leader Ismail Hanieh
The only embarrassment is that Hamas is still around.
You are not alone. Just gotta vote the Democrats out.
I think they were saying it is embarrassing because we are tucking tail
@@VoFALTthat's embarrassing for Israel 😂😂🤦
And how, exactly, does demolishing a country rid it of its extreme hate based ideologies?
Zionism?
That was never the goal and everyone knows that. It's simply not possible in an extremely religious zealot community. How do you monitor and enforce Imams and mosques to not spew propaganda? The plan from the start was to implement the same system of the West Bank in Gaza.
@@drdr8859 How do you expect zio psychos to not brainwash their kids with propaganda, hand their teens weapons and tell them oppress and subjugate another population
@@drdr8859one easy way is to not give the people a reason to fight. Regardless of ideology terrorrism always has a socioeconomic angle that’s often overlooked.
@@ingenix1460 But regardless of what we do they always find a reason to fight us. They don’t call only Israelis that live in the West Bank as settlers, They call all of us that. For them the fight will be over when Israel no longer exists.
This didn't age well and it's been less than a week
It will never end
A “sustainable” ceasefire = No Hamas. Read the resolution accompanying texts and analyses.
A sustainable ceasefire means no illegal occupation of the west bank , brutal attacks on innocent Palestinian citizens and the virtual imprisonment and forced starvation of 2 million people. but hey , its only semantics 🙄🙄🙄🙄
I much prefer titles that are questions and only an eight of the relevant information. Is that not what you go to news for? The adrenaline shot?
Who are we kidding? We are a client state of Israel.
That's not true. Israel depens on the US. Not the other way around. While the US surly benefits it doesn't need Israel. But Israel is nothing with US money
Now theres a TLDR news
Mother never gives away her child
Your videos are such a joy to watch. Thank you
Considering the topic, I would say joy is a strong word
I wanted to comment a tech science related video from another chanel😂 my fault😂😂
Not the first time there has been abstention on Isreal by the US. By November this won't matter.
It already doesnt matter
It's never mattered and it won't ever matter. The attention span of the people has gotten so short, we excuse anything with anything nowadays. Remember when Congress randomly started talking about aliens and shit? It's all a show.
That’s like asking has Steven ditched Mr Candie
as if that is even possible.
Hopefully this will be the end of Netanyahu...
He and his party has been behind most of the conflict since the Oslo process...
Sure he massacred 1200 jews on oct 7th right? That was all netanyahu wasn't it
Completely untrue. I hate Netanyahu and I still know that he isn't responsible for the failure of Oslo.
Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas are responsible for refusing to sign the final status deal, which would have resulted in the immediate creation of a Palestinian state. THEY sabotaged Oslo!
So what should they have done then? I have noticed many people take issue with what Israel did, but nobody has a serious suggestion as to what they could have done. Ask Hamas pretty please to let the people they kidnapped go? Promise not to celebrate those that tortured parents in front of their children and raped and murdered civilians? Maybe you think an international tribunal could have been estsblished to seek justice for the victims. Really, what was the path here?
@@saus9870
If it wasn't for Netanyahu and his activities, letting illegal settlers get away with breaking international law, kicking Palestineans out of their homes, killing them etc Hamas and other Palestinan organisations fighting Israel wouldn't have this many members, and they wouldn't have as much support as they have from outside of Palestina, from Iran and other Muslim and non-Muslim countries alike.
Netanyahu has done more to endanger civilians in Israel then Hamas ever has, and he is in the process of endangering the very existence of the country Israel with his actions as quite frankly a lot of countries are starting to question the wisdom of letting the nation exist in the first place, even within the borders of the original UN resolution...
Let alone all of its expansions...
If you really care about Israel then you *really* shouldn't support Netanyahu...
Don't get me wrong, there would have been conflicts even without Netanyahu, but the scale would have been smaller.
And that attack that happened would almost certainly not have happened.
More Palestineans would have been friendly to Israel and willing to provide intelligence, increasing the probability of the attack being averted.
Less incompetent leaders would have been in charge of Israels defenses.
Less resources would have been wasted in pointless wars, freeing them up for both defense and strengthening the Israeli economy that's in shambles under Netanyahu.
Israels reputation abroad would have been better, with more nations actually sympathetic towards Israel.
After the attack a lot of countries where actually sympathetic towards Israel, but the country has done *far* worse then that terrorist attack and all the ones preceding it this decade by now and has lost *all* international sympathy outside of the doomsday cults in the US...
Even the *US* went along with the recent UN resolution.
The US of all countries.
You really think that would have happened under anyone else but Netanyahu?
He's a incompetent and corrupt autocrat, and a fraud that belongs in jail, not in charge of a country.
And furthermore there's some indications that he was also involved in the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin...
No, Netanyahu was sent to Earth by the adversary, and is a enemy of God if ever there was one.
And I can't believe that you think he can be defended in any way, shape or form.
So yes, in my view the blood of those terrorist victims where very much on his hands, more so then even the leaders of Hamas and the gunmen shooting them.
They might have pulled the trigger, but he put the guns in their hands to begin with.
i like how the hasbara bots ignore the fact that it's 700 civilians, and ignore the fact that netenyahu is a warcriminal and yelling 7th 999 times won't change that@@saus9870
Has anyone still not?
wich country proposed this resolution?
0:09 just curious, didn’t Russia 🇷🇺 & China 🇨🇳 veto USA’s resolution as reported on news?
you obviously didn't watch the entire video lmao
Whats he track record for the US ditching middle eastern countries?
Yes but this is Israel the country that the USA bends over backwards for
0.
What's the track record for unjustified invasions of middle eastern countries? Because chances are we're still there in some capacity.
@@user-nb7co9hs3g I watched that documentary escape from Kabul people where hanging on to the outside of planes and flying off hundreds of feet off the ground.. I know Afghanistan isn't exactly middle east but still.. if they can ditch Afghanistan they can ditch Israel..
@@user-oh3xj5kt5q I hope they do but they won't.
Most of the people running the show are Christians. They believe in the 2nd coming of christ. In order for Jesus christ to return, the state of Israel must exist.
Good diplomatic policy is when both sides are unhappy. Lets hope they can all come to agree they can live with.
Doesn’t matter
Oh, i wish.
Its just politics and theatre for citizens. Do you really think US will ditch Israel because of issues with one government? Do you think they ditch all the investment, do you think they ditch one of few reliable partners (also with decent military power and economy) in the region?
They were building this relationship for loooong time now, so sorry if i dont believe they will scratch it just because of UN. Whats more likely that they try to save face and before US elections, not to give "the other side" any ammo - they need all votes, both of the candidates but BIden more, having clear stance is not what they want, they want possible deniability - "look guys, we didnt veto it, now please vote for us."
Cant trust the UsA any longer… they are fickle…. Lack perseverance and are not loyal or principled.
Short answer: no
"I learned somethin' today. This country was founded by some of the smartest thinkers the world has ever seen. And they knew one thing: that a truly great country can go to war, and at the same time, act like it doesn't want to." - Eric Cartman
thank you for taking Hamas' claim about being willing to exchange hostages on its face despite spending months rejecting every single ceasefire prisoner for hostage swap deal proposed in the last couple months, nice, its a mild bias, but it is lying by omission imo, a bit disappointing.
Geopolitics over universal human rights every time 4:13
Absolutely shameful
i think this is impossible but who knows
So long as AIPAC has money and they keep putting it in the pockets of our representatives, the US-Israel industrial complex will thrive.
So long as the US military industry uses its economic filth to do some _good_ like preventing another holocaust, most Americans don't _care_ about your opinion.
If you had an ally like this, who need enemies?!?...this expression is work for both side 😂
I wish, but i guess not.
How can you ditch someone and send them $3,300,000,000 in military aid, while preventing their victims from filing a lawsuit
"Victims" that support the government that launched an attack with the sole aim of killing as many civilians as possible
Ramadan ends in 2 weeks. Waste of time.
Spend in over 600 million dollars to fix the biltalmor bridge is a waste of time my cowboy 🤡
@@samiman5606?
A billion dollars to Isreal every year is more of a waste.
@@ahmedmahamedosman8950 So to the Arabs.
@@yevgeni10 They're only getting bribed to turn a blind eye to what Israel is doing
4:36 Dislocating my shoulder is an injury.
Palestinians losing their limbs is what would be called maimed
4 years ago the US abstained at the UNSC over a anti-settlements resolution (resolution 2334). Have the relations between the countries ended?
according to the washington post, more bombs and jets have been signed off on as of yesterday... so that's a resounding no. while state department staff quit over human rights and genocide violations.
I really don't understand what both sides of this war are trying to achieve. The Israel can't kill everyone in Gaza so it can't irradicate Hamas as they say. The Palestine can't hold onto some hostages while people are living like that. What is the best outcome for both sides? What each of them would think winning looks like?
Spot on.i have been trying to decipher what both sides want to achieve by prolonging this war.Its just sheer greed from leaders from both sides
Stop thinking of the sides as Palestine and Israel, and think of the sides as Hamas and Netenyahu, then it makes more sense.
Exactly and i agree with the replies im glad someone sees it this way too.
The operation al Aqsa flood didn’t have a contingency and the current israeli administration was already pretty unstable under Netanyahu: unstoppable force vs immovable object
Hamas does not care about Gaza or Gazans. Hamas objective is to turn Israel into an international pariah and it will sustain the conflict until it feels the world is actually siding with Israel. If a ceasefire is achieved, Hamas will almost immediately start violating it in small ways (lob a few rockets here and there) in an effort to provoke Israel into another asymetrical response that enrages Europe.
Netenyahu and other extremists wants to end the viabilty of Gaza as a political entity. They dont care where the people go so long as they leave Gaza and it is not Israel. They do want to level the place and make it impossible for it to support its existing population.
@@willbarnstead3194 Untrue. I hate Netanyahu, and most Jews have turned against him, but they also overwhelmingly support the war.
Tick...Tock....Rafah
Finally
I thought the UN Security Council had the power to decide intervention in a conflict? As in, giving a nation international approval for intervention; allowing the U.S. for example to enforce a no fly zone/etc.
No one can allow or disallow the US from doing things, because they gap between them and everyone else is that large. In this case, it is non binding, so there is no enforcement.
@@kingk1336 no I get what you mean, military/economically no one can tell the U.S. no, unless the world literally was against it, but that would mean politically the U.S. needs justification. Otherwise we lose authority as we have over the decades for abusing our power. Be it Iraq or Afghanistan.
The US trying to enforce a no fly zone would mean war with Israel, and Biden wouldn't have enough internal support for that. Not to mention that Israel has nukes, and the US isn't going to risk a nuclear war for Gaza.
Why would the U.S. enforce a no fly zone for a resolution it hasn't supported? The security council is only as strong as its memebers. If they are not willing to act then the UNSC is powerless.
Why would Russian vote count for anything, though? If you don't follow the laws, you don't get to make the laws.
Which country on the security council follows the laws?
You are not the only one to think like this, there are many. You need to educate yourself on why the UN security council was created and what purpose it serves. The UN security council has 5 permanent members USA China Russia France UK (so the big boys) and 10 temporary members. If the world wants something then you must take into account what all those 5 permanent members have to say. Now the UK USA and France always vote for or against something for the same reason and on the other hand you have Russia and China partnering up. You do not want to push some rule of the world without taking the largest nuclear power and 2nd strongest military into account regardless of if they are breaking the law to some extent (note that what Russia has done is small on a global scale but if it were to do something massive then the western power would stand up to that)
" If you don't follow the laws, you don't get to make the laws." So you have never been to a democrat run area?
@@jerrymiller9039have you ever been in a Republican area.
As if the US follows any laws
My heartfelt sympathies go out to the Israeli government, tirelessly working around the clock to send aid through its borders to address famine. I empathize with the immense challenges they must be facing while searching for their precious hostages in such a big area. Additionally, it saddens me deeply to hear about Eylon Levy's dismissal as speaker for Israel.
I can also do sarcasm.
6:26 UN secretary general NOT security
No, no it doesn't sadly.
the applause that followed that vote is arguably more powerful than the resolution itself, it is ominous sign of things to come, Israel is effectively a pariah....and they have lost their most powerful weapon, Israel and the US no longer control the narrative in this conflict. Soon there will be a voluntary arms embargo,then an arms embargo, then some small trade restrictions ...that's how they always start...and then you wake up one day and suddenly you are not in any sporting event , you can barely travel anyway and flights to even the shortest areas have to take long routes, the Gucci store downtown is now selling some Knock offs...just ask South Africans how it all began.
Hahah log off addul you’ve earned your rial today
@@Meteyard97 mad?
bruh anyone from gaza would wanna live in Israel than be civilian shields of an anti Semitic terror organisation backed by Iran, Hezbollah and occasionally even al Qaeda. I do not condone Israel's war efforts and the civilian casualties but it's Hamas who has rejected the latest ceasefire talks. I stand with the Palestinian civilians and do not appreciate any blame game but the biggest losers are the civilians, not Israel or Hamas...
@@Meteyard97he gave his perspective... you z1o supporters have always had some kind of hatred inside your hearts.
Israel can just ally itself with China instead if they're pushed too hard, since China doesn't care about human rights and Israel can provide it with western tech.
Not yet, but it may finally have run out of the Holocaust-credit that allowed the creation of Israel in the first place and has sustained it for 75 years. From now on Israel may have to make its case purely on its own merits..
Yeah the US had enough of Natenyahu
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE.
Does UN demand ceasefire from ruzzia or they gave up on that?
If they did, they would probably ask for it without releasing the POW's...
I think that might be useless, since russia can veto it
Repeatedly. Russia vetoed it, to the surprise of nobody.
They tried but Russia veto it alongside china
That would be like if Israel had a veto on the UN security council. It'd never happen. Everyone gave up on it for that reason.
Never forgetting that USS liberty incident
no
2:09, damn must have been a akward momment.
"Every time anyone says that Israel is our only friend in the Middle East, I can't help but think that, before Israel, we had no enemies in the Middle East."
Before Israel the middle east was divided between France and UK
@@yoavlavi310the point still stands
Before Israel you had *NOTHING* in the Middle East, we are your sole representatives there, except us everybody hates and despises the US over there, we are the only freaking democratic country over there
So you dont know history. Its ok that you don't. But probably should do basic research before posting stupid comments.
Maybe because the whole middle east was controlled by Europe? And before that the ottomans..
I said this on a comment below, but I´ll repeat it here. The UN is only as good as its members, really whether the US turns off the taps is what makes the difference.
The only way that we can have world peace, in my view, is if all countries give up their armies and agree to an international police force, made up of members from all states, to enforce decisions of the UN. That´s the only way laws have been successfully enforced in Nation states, the only way you can really have peace is if the state has the "monopoly of force", I think that´s true at the international level too.
This is of course a remote pipe dream for the timebeing, it´s difficult enough to achieve this in somewhere like the EU, where no state fully complies with EU legislation and there´s no real enforcement against States who break the core principles of EU law egregiously, i.e Hungary would probably not be let in now, if it tried to join, it´s not a functional liberal democracy any more. Yet, there is no independent agency that can really enforce the rules, and say "comply, or face consequences". Indeed, Orban was protected by Merkel in exchange for votes in the council for ages.
These things may be pipe dreams for now, but I think we all have to try to reach them somehow.
Liberal democracies are still the minority of nation-states. Why would any global government enforce liberal democratic values just because it has the monopoly of force?
Based on the actual track record of most international bodies, I think an authoritarian technocracy is more likely.
Not to mention a global government could still experience civil conflict, which can be just as bad as formal war.
No
@@Mohamed-kq2mj I don´t think it can happen immediately, but it would be a good eventual goal.
I don´t think anything is gained from warfare and all this fighting.
@@Letsthinkaboutit-mb7nn even if it is actually like a way for peace, which will never be achieved, how are countries even gonna give up their army
@@Mohamed-kq2mj well if you read what I wrote, you will see that I said "it will be difficult and for now it´s a pipe dream".
There are some tentative ways it may be done though. For starters, I think there is such a thing as a peace dividend.
France and Germany between 1870 and 1945 had four major wars, but now things are pretty good between those two countries. Eventually, the peoples did see the need to put the past behind them and that they had far more to gain by having peace with each other.
I think that´s what we have to show, that the peace dividend is absolutely real. And there has been som progress on this in Europe, i.e the border issues of the pre-1945 world have more or less been solved and few people are seriously attempting to redraw them.
were it so easy...
5:07 Cause that will give them very bad reputation
And hamas ignored the ICJ in the first ruling where they told hamas to release the hostages yet hamas ignored it so israel will do the same.....
Because Hamas are terrorists. Israel supposed to be a first world nation. Israel can’t claim moral superiority to Hamas when appealing to the world and equivalence in justifying its actions.
What hostages you mean Israelis or palestinians hostages?
@@jhingoorpatima237there are not any Palestinian hostages, they are prisoners who committed crimes
@@originalchunky300 what about idf crimes?
@@originalchunky300Israel imprisons people, including children without charge or trial all the time, and that lawfully thanks to „administrative detentions“. There are more than enough reports of human rights organisations on it that you can read so you don’t have to spread misinformation next time. You’re welcome.