Head Graphene 360+ Radical MP Tennis Racquet Review (2021)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 203

  • @peterlappland
    @peterlappland 3 года назад +12

    best tennis I've seen Chris play in some time, make the switch

    • @linusx77
      @linusx77 3 года назад +1

      Agreed. Great shots

  • @AustinLNale
    @AustinLNale 3 года назад +6

    Whoever TW has doing the camerawork & video editing in Alpharetta is really talented!

    • @BK-ks2sf
      @BK-ks2sf 3 года назад

      Lol it's u isn't it

    • @AustinLNale
      @AustinLNale 3 года назад

      @@BK-ks2sf 😆 no I wish I was that talented!

  • @BuzzLightyeear
    @BuzzLightyeear 3 года назад

    Looks really cool. Head has been killing it with the 360+ line of racquets.

  • @huichihin4514
    @huichihin4514 3 года назад +3

    Great review guys! How does it compare to the Radical Pro, Gravity Pro, Ezone 98 tour and Pure Drive tour? Thanks:)

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +5

      Basically same as the Radical Pro just a bit more maneuverable, and lighter. A bit more firm, and precise than the Gravity Pro. EZONE 98 Tour is closer in weight to the Radical Pro, but EZONE 98 Tour packs a bit more power. Pure Drive Tour is slightly more maneuverable than the Radical Pro, but is the stiffest and packs easier power than the rest of the racquets mentioned. Troy, TW

  • @GreySox
    @GreySox 3 года назад +1

    Nice review. It would be helpful if you included the beam width in the video or the video description.

  • @idna_firry
    @idna_firry 2 года назад

    Great video! very useful as I plan to get a racket that’s 98 and 300g unstrung, and apart from this model I could find only the tecnifibre TFight 300 RS. which of the 2 should I pick?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад +1

      Tough choice, do you have the ability to demo?! That would be my initial suggestion. But we really like these Radicals and the great blend of power and control!
      Michelle, TW

  • @cliveharmsworth8043
    @cliveharmsworth8043 3 года назад

    First playtester has v good game. I've currently got the last model, g360 radical mp with full bed head velocity 16. If I was 30 years younger I could be tempted by this tangerine. It's heavier, stock 300 and swingweight 326,twistweight 14.4, so little less manoeuvrable. I feel it's more for advanced players.

  • @christoscholevas
    @christoscholevas 2 года назад

    Hello! Nice review!
    How does it compare with the Ezone 100 and the Ezone 98?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад

      It is closer to the EZONE 98, being that they have the same headsize, but a bit more control, feel, and plow through with this Radical MP. The EZONE 98 feels a bit more lively, or has a bit more energy return, and feels a bit more maneuverable. The EZONE 100 packs even more power than the 98, as well as spin potential, but does a good job of maintaining comfort. Troy, TW

  • @titonik9290
    @titonik9290 2 года назад +1

    I want to thank TW for all your great reviews. I bought a lot from you when I lived in the US, can't you use your store now that I moved back to Russia. Your service and products were excellent though.

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад +1

      Thank you for shopping with us, and glad that we were able to help you with our service, products, and reviews. Since you are in Russia now, you can always check out our website Tennis Warehouse Europe, www.tenniswarehouse-europe.com. Troy, TW

  • @mhkeuns
    @mhkeuns 3 года назад +1

    Head is going in the right direction with the G360+ lines of rackets. Though I love my G360+ Prestige MP, this one looks amazing.

  • @wenruli
    @wenruli 3 года назад +1

    I really like the youtek ig racdical that I hit long time ago. How does this new version compare to that.

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      This one plays a bit more firm, and provides a bit easier pop or power. The Youtek IG Radical MP provides a bit more control, with it being more flexible, and with the 18x20 pattern, it also feels a bit more comfortable. Troy, TW

  • @ek2140
    @ek2140 Год назад

    upgraded from the radical mpa 16x16 and struggling mightly with it. the 5g difference feels huge even though my mpa has added 3g of lead at the 3 and 9. could it be i have a very over specced 360+ and underspec mpa to have such a big difference? i don't get enough swing speed compared to the mpa.
    The launch angle is a lot lower and sweet spot feels smaller on the 360+.
    My mpa version is using rpm rough 125 at 50lbs and the 360+ has poly tour rev 120 (not sure of the tension as i got it second hand). should I restring it with a multi at 55 lbs? or better go to soft poly at 48lbs? or maybe soft poly at 50 or 51 lbs main and 48 on crosses to increase the launch angle?
    also didn't quite like the new grip pallet. the mpa size 2 tk 82 feels a lot better than the 360+ size 2. I also play with speed ports white and red size 2 and 3 with overgrips but it was fine with the more rounded grip but this tk82s feels off. maybe i should go bigger

  • @eldontabuzo4447
    @eldontabuzo4447 2 года назад

    Hello Jason from Tennis Warehouse, How would you compare this radical mp to boom PRO? Which feels heavier to swing? I'm stuck between the two in which to buy. I prefer a maneuverable racket. Please I need your suggestion between the two. Thanks Jason

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад

      I'd say both feel easier to swing than the listed specs. And both are actually very similar in terms in maneuverability, but I'd give a slight edge to the Radical MP. If you want the whippier/easier to swing racquet, I'd go with the Radical MP, but call in to place your order and request for us to pull a few racquets and get you the lowest swingweight of the bunch. -Jason, TW

    • @eldontabuzo4447
      @eldontabuzo4447 2 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse Thanks Jason! But overall which of the two would you recommend?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад

      I think we're all giving the slight edge to the Radical MP, especially if you want the faster, more maneuverable feel. -Troy, TW

    • @eldontabuzo4447
      @eldontabuzo4447 2 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse Hello Troy and Jason, but why the Radical MP has higher 326 swing weight than the boom pro with 325 swing weight?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад +1

      @@eldontabuzo4447, The average swingweights are essantially the same, but with the Radical MP being lighter overall, it is more maneuverable and a bit easier to swing. Also, what Jason mentioned, if you order from TW we recommend using the MRT service where we can search for the lowest swingweight in a batch of racquets, especially if you are so concerned with the maneuverability. For any racquet brand that you purchase, the specs especially swingweight can fluctuate, so you may not be getting what the average is that we have posted on our site. Troy, TW

  • @RizkyHaeruman
    @RizkyHaeruman 3 года назад

    Thankyou TW for the review. I'm searching for racket that can give me more control and feel. I have trouble about the overhit and miss long when I try to full swing.
    Can you help me which one is better for me, Radical MP or Speed MP or Prestige MP?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +2

      When you say more control and feel, which racquet are you using the most currently? Just wondering so I can gauge how much control and feel compared to that. Of the three the Prestige MP has the most control and feel, followed closely the Radical MP, and then the Speed MP. All could potentially be good choices, just depending on how far you want to go with the control. Troy, TW

  • @Le-Chuck
    @Le-Chuck 3 года назад +2

    Hi. Could you please compare the radical mp with the vcore98 ? I wondering which one i have to buy. I already tried the vcore98.

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +2

      The VCORE 98 provides a bit easier access to power, and is more spin friendly. The Radical MP 2021 offers slightly more control, feel, and is slightly more stable on contact. Troy, TW

    • @Le-Chuck
      @Le-Chuck 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse thx. I had some arms issues with the previous head rad mp and pure strike. I looking for some stick like these 2 ones but also with confort. Which one is the most confortable ? Thx again. 😜👍

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +3

      @@Le-Chuck We would likely give the edge in comfort to the Radical MP 2021. We also recommend the Dunlop CX 200, or Head Gravity MP. Troy TW

    • @Le-Chuck
      @Le-Chuck 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse thx. I also noticed the Gravity and wondered about the Wilson blade v7 but fear to lack spin. Thx for your answers.

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      @@Le-Chuck, You are welcome. We find the spin on the Blade 98 16x19, and Gravity MP to be pretty comparable to the Radical MP and Pure Strike 16x19. Troy, TW

  • @mikedonovan2470
    @mikedonovan2470 3 года назад +1

    Hey guys I'm torn which racket is best for tennis elbow out of the gravity pro, gravity tour, Wilson blade, radical pro, and radical mp. Which one do you guys feel is best for it? I serve a volley a lot but to keep up I've had to transition to an all around game. I've been hitting with the microgel mp since 2009 😬
    Thanks guys,

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      For a high level of comfort, we would likely steer you towards either the Gravity Pro, Tour, or Blade 98. The Radical Pro and MP are good racquets, and we didn't have any issues with comfort, but they are a bit more firm than the other racquets mentioned. Between the Gravity Pro, Tour, and Blade 98, they are all pretty comfortable. Maybe a slight edge to the Pro because of the extra mass, but it is pretty close. Troy, TW

    • @mikedonovan2470
      @mikedonovan2470 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse ah ok ill give those a demo! Do you think ngr2, nxt, or bi phase would be a good pick for tennis elbow and the pro, tour, and blade?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      @@mikedonovan2470, Sure those are all very comfortable strings, and we really enjoy the NRG2. Troy, TW

  • @bmanbusee3812
    @bmanbusee3812 2 года назад

    Hi. Been playing with the radical S and thinking about upgrading to the mp. The S is pretty nice and helped my game immensely but feel like I need more weight. Would there be a big adjustment from the S to mp, particularly the head size? I’m a 3.0 to 3.5 player. Thanks!

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад

      There will likely be some adjustment when first trying to get used to a new racquet, such as the MP. The MP offers more control and precision, while also being a bit heavier. It is hard to say for certain how easy or difficult the transition might be, although typically speaking we would recommend the Radical MP for players around the 4.0 rating and above. Also, if it is more weight that you are seeking, have you considered trying to customize or add some weight to your Radical S? Troy, TW

    • @bmanbusee3812
      @bmanbusee3812 2 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse Thanks for response. I’ve read even some beginners use the mp to start without much issue. Guess depends on a lot of things. Thought about adding weight strips but didn’t know where to start it going that route. Have any suggestions on what to use and where to initially place on the radical S then? Thanks

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад

      @@bmanbusee3812, You can definitely use the Radical MP at any level really, but I guess it will just make a difference on how easy or difficult it is to play with. As far as adding weight to a racquet, we have a lot of information and helpful videos here: www.tennis-warehouse.com/learning_center/how_to/customize_your_tennis_racquet.html. Troy, TW

    • @bmanbusee3812
      @bmanbusee3812 2 года назад +1

      @@tenniswarehouse True. Have the mp now for demo and just did some shadow swings in house. Yet to actually hit with it but it feels good and stable. Will see. Thanks for the weight suggestion link. Cheers

  • @tennisbee
    @tennisbee 3 года назад

    Head Extreme tour is so similar to Head Radical MP 2021 (same beam width, 305g vs 300 unstrung weight, 318g vs 326g swing weight). How would you compare in terms of Power, Spin and Stability?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      Power/control is fairly close between the two, but maybe just a bit easier power with the Extreme Tour, and spin is easier with it as well. The Radical MP packs a bit more plow through, feels a bit more stable, and just a slight bit more control. As the swingweight indicates, the Extreme Tour is a bit more maneuverable, and the Radical MP swings with a bit more heft. Troy, TW

  • @mrzapapate3083
    @mrzapapate3083 3 года назад +1

    Hi. Could you compare this one to the new Vcore 98 ? ;)

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      The new VCORE 98 feels a bit more lively or powerful, and offers easier access to spin (both 16x19 but VCORE 98 more spacing). This Radical MP offers a bit more control, and feel for the ball, and maybe just a slightly more sluggish feel with the swingweight and balance. Troy, TW

  • @josedejesus946
    @josedejesus946 3 года назад

    How would this compare to a AeroPro Drive 2013? I’ve been looking for a replacement. Didn’t like the Pure Aeros. Not enough control. Looking for a racquet for easy spin and control. Thanks!

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      This one offers a bit more control, and feel, it also feels a bit more solid and a bit heftier (higher swingweight). I might also consider the Pure Aero VS, Yonex VCORE 98, and Head Extreme Tour or MP. Troy, TW

  • @tedneanderthal7373
    @tedneanderthal7373 3 года назад

    Is it shaped like the old Head Director line or am I seeing things? It's probably a bit larger in overall square inches though.

  • @David-wi8ve
    @David-wi8ve 3 года назад +1

    Many thanks for all the great info. How would you compare this one to the speed pro in terms of launch angle, control and maneuverability? Any substantial differences in those areas?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      A bit higher launch angle with this Radical MP, and it is also a bit more maneuverable, slightly lighter weight and swingweight. Control is pretty close between the two, but maybe just a bit more precise with this Radical and its 98 headsize, and slightly bigger sweet-spot with the Speed Pro. Troy, TW

    • @David-wi8ve
      @David-wi8ve 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse Thanks a lot Troy, really appreciate it!!

    • @DAreturner
      @DAreturner 3 года назад

      Is there a big difference in skill level required between playing with the 2?

  • @andresibanezvasquez6152
    @andresibanezvasquez6152 2 года назад

    One question, I have a Babolat Pure Aero and the ball is flying out on me a lot. Adjusting my form to get more topspin works but I would like to know if this Radical MP will give me more control (less power), since the specs are somewhat similar to that of the Pure Aero. Also, is it more arm friendly? Thanks

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад

      Yes, this Radical MP will provide some added control and precision compared to the Babolat Pure Aero. You should also notice some added comfort as well, it is a bit more flexible than the Pure Aero, and has decent dampening. Troy, TW

  • @andrewrussell3011
    @andrewrussell3011 3 года назад

    My list of racquets to try just keeps getting longer.
    I have the original graphene radical but with added lead to make it 330gms unstrung. Swing weight 342. Should I wait and try the pro? Or just buy a pro staff v13 (or an ezone tour, or maybe the Prince phantom 100P).

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      haha, you just named some nice playing racquets. If you like to customize your frames then this one should work well, but the new Radical Pro coming is nice and solid feeling, so I would probably go with the Pro. The Pro Staff 978 v13 feels slightly more precise, but maybe a bit smaller sweet-spot. The EZONE 98 Tour is legit, but packs a bit easier power than the Radical. The Phantom 100P is all about its feel, flex, and great comfort, but fairly low in power, great feel though. Troy, TW

    • @andrewrussell3011
      @andrewrussell3011 3 года назад +1

      @@tenniswarehouse thanks Troy, appreciate the input. Just have to wait until lockdown ends in the UK so we are allowed back on court!

  • @ablelad1872
    @ablelad1872 2 года назад

    How does the Radical MP 360+ compare to an Extreme Tour 360+? (especially a weighted-up Extreme Tour...).

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад

      They are fairly close overall in the specs. That said, most will find the Radical MP (360+ or 2021) to have a bit more control, and feel, while the Extreme Tour packs a bit easier power, and and easier access to spin. By weighting the racquet up, it will usually increase stability and plow through, and sometimes add a bit of power, when adding weight to towards the tip. Troy, TW

  • @seanconnolly5645
    @seanconnolly5645 3 года назад

    Hi Troy. Can you please compare Strike 98 3rd gen and 2021 Head Radical MP

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      They are pretty close in overall maneuverability, maybe just a bit more maneuverable with the Radical MP. Besides that we would give the slight edge to the Radical MP for a bit more control, and feel, whereas the Strike 98 16x19 3rd gen offers a bit easier power, and slightly firmer. Troy, TW

    • @seanconnolly5645
      @seanconnolly5645 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse thank you Troy!

  • @BangBang-tj2rc
    @BangBang-tj2rc 3 года назад

    Which has more control? More power? 360+ radical mp or 360+ radical pro?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      The MP provides a bit easier access to power, as it is easier to maneuver, and has a slightly thicker beam in the hoop. The Pro offers a bit more control, feel, and plow through. Troy, TW

  • @jakobolesen4450
    @jakobolesen4450 3 года назад

    Hi, can you compare this vs Head Speed pro 360+ - Spin, comfort, control and power -Thanks

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      This one offers easier access to spin, the Speed Pro is slightly more comfortable, Power is pretty close between the two, but this Radical is a bit more precise. Troy, TW

  • @kadensalvador7008
    @kadensalvador7008 3 года назад

    Hi TW. Would you recommend a 1.25 or 1.30 poly in the radical mp and the extreme tour. I'm coming from a vcore pro 310 with 1.30 confidential.

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      I wouldn't say the string spacing is significantly different between the those racquets, although the Extreme Tour is likely a bit more open spacing, and the Radical MP 2021 is a bit more dense. So I would probably go 1.30 in the Extreme Tour, and 1.25 in the Radical MP 2021. Troy, TW

    • @kadensalvador7008
      @kadensalvador7008 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse Thanks Troy! I definitely found 16g a little to hard to play with in the radical.

  • @MrRodrigo4815
    @MrRodrigo4815 2 года назад

    Does this head radical 2021 racket have more power than the head radical mp graphene 360 racket?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад

      Power levels will be pretty close overall. The Graphene 360 is slightly stiffer in the throat or yoke region, so sometimes that gives the sensation of a bit more energy return, but the average swingweight of the two racquets is pretty close, so overall not huge differences in the power. Troy, TW

  • @ers87
    @ers87 3 года назад +1

    How does it compare to the Yonex Ezone 98? Thanks, TW!

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +3

      This one is a bit more stable, offers a bit more plow, and slightly more feel for the ball. The EZONE 98 swings a bit quicker, and provides a bit easier power. Troy, TW

    • @ers87
      @ers87 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse Thanks, Troy. Good matches!

    • @robertjuliusbalangat639
      @robertjuliusbalangat639 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse how about the comfort between the two?

  • @ceola150
    @ceola150 3 года назад

    This one or the pure strike 16x19? Which one has more control? And what about Spin?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      This one offers a bit more control, and spin is pretty similar between the two. Troy, TW

  • @golroger1201
    @golroger1201 2 года назад

    is this a good racket for doubles? or should i go for the pure drive / pure aero?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад +2

      It definitely can be, and one of our Team TW players, Luisa Stefani, plays with it on the WTA doubles tour. I think it just comes down to your preference in feel, and power/control level. This Radical MP will provide a bit more control, precision, and feel for the ball when compared to the Pure Drive or Pure Aero. The Radical MP is also a bit more flexible, and comfortable compared to the Pure Drive or Pure Aero. The Pure Drive and Pure Aero are pretty similar in specs, with the Aero being a bit more topspin friendly, and a bit less stiff, and the Pure Drive provides the easiest access to power, and has a slightly firmer feel to the Aero. Troy, TW

    • @golroger1201
      @golroger1201 2 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse thank you very much😍

  • @reb349
    @reb349 3 года назад +2

    Does it have the usual Head grip shape?

    • @peterlappland
      @peterlappland 3 года назад

      prob tk82s, I'm adding tk82

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +5

      These have the more modern grip shape, that became popular with the Speed racquets (TK82S pallet). It is more similar to a Wilson or Prince, and is on the new Radicals, Prestiges, and all current models from Head. Troy, TW

    • @peterlappland
      @peterlappland 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse with pallets its more about what I am used to, playing th82 for so long its hard to switch, especially during matchplay

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +2

      @@peterlappland, Yeah, I get that as a lot players who have used Head for many years will be used to that more classic rectangular shape. But I think Head made the decision to convert over all their racquet lines to the TK82S as it is a bit more similar to most other racquet brands nowadays, except for maybe Volkl and Tecnifibre. Anyway, good luck with your racquet set-up and dialing it in! Troy, TW

    • @peterlappland
      @peterlappland 3 года назад +1

      @@tenniswarehouse very true man, I like the new grip but its a process to get used to it and often not worth it

  • @parklife7418
    @parklife7418 3 года назад

    I play a Gravity Pro. Before the Gravity i played the Pure Strike 16x19 but i was to often to long with it and i love the bigger sweet spot of the gravity. Now i m searching for something just a little bit more powerfull and something that gives a little more feedback to my arm. It should not be something completele different because i like the Gravity for real.
    Do you have any idea what i could try?
    Thanks for the help and sorry for my english(:

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +2

      So it hard to say which one would be best for a middle ground between the Gravity Pro and Pure Strike 98 16x19, and some you may have already tried, but here is a list of frames that we would consider(some might need some customization depending on weight): Radical MP or Pro, Speed Pro, EZONE 98 or 98 Tour, Prince Textreme Tour 100P, Tecnifibre TF40, VCORE Pro 97, Tecnifibre TFight 305 RS, Wilson Blade 98 18x20 or 16x19, Dunlop CX 200. Troy, TW

    • @parklife7418
      @parklife7418 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse
      Thank you very much. I think the service you provide is extremely great. With all your video test reports... When I first started playing tennis I used to order from tennispoint but I quickly realised that you guys offer a much better service. Big compliments. If I may, I have one more question. I am looking for the thinnest grip tape in your range. I have read that the Torna Pro Thin is the thinnest of all. Unfortunately, I can't find it in your shop. Do you have a tape that is similarly thin? Material ... doesn't matter as I always use an overgrip.
      Greetings from Italy(:

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      @@parklife7418, Thank you for the feedback, and the support, we try our best to help out the consumers, and tennis players such as yourself. If you are asking about the Tourna Pro Thin, I assume you want a replacement grip, or the grip that comes stock on the racquet. We do have the Tourna Pro Thin grip here at TW (US), but but not at TW Europe. Of our stock at TW Europe, the Wilson Featherthin Replacement Grip, or Babolat Syntec Team are good choices for a thin replacment grip. And if you pair it with a thin overgrip like the Wilson Pro Overgrip Sensation, that should offer a nice and thin feel. Troy, TW

    • @alastairtheduke
      @alastairtheduke Год назад

      Oddly enough, I had a similar experience with the pure strike. Kept sailing on me.

  • @CalazaBR
    @CalazaBR 3 года назад

    What's the string and tension they use on first part of video, to put that easily and beautiful top spin? I had one, and I put adrenaline 1.30 string, it's not that easy for me to put that spin.

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      Head Lynx Tour, at 52 pounds. Troy, TW

    • @CalazaBR
      @CalazaBR 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse Thanks Troy.

  • @yashjain2305
    @yashjain2305 2 года назад

    Is this similar to Blade V8? Which one is better?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад +1

      The main difference, say compared to the 16x19 version of the Blade 98 v8, will be the feel and stiffness. The Radical MP is a bit stiffer, and has a thicker beam in the hoop, around 3/9 o'clock, so it gives a bit more pop or energy return. The Blade 98 16x19 v8 is a bit more flexible overall, and slightly lower in power, but a little more comofortable. Troy, TW

  • @jjj_kkk7354
    @jjj_kkk7354 3 года назад

    Hello. How do you compare this head to wilson blade v7 16x19?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +2

      This one is a bit more firm, crisp feeling, and maybe just a bit more pop off the racquet. The Blade 98 16x19 v7 is a bit more flexible, a bit more soft and smooth on contact, and pockets the ball a bit more for some added feel. Overall power, control, and spin are fairly close. Troy, TW

  • @lucab8146
    @lucab8146 3 года назад

    Can someone tell me if there are big differences with the previous model? Thank you very much

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      We find this update to offer a bit more feel for the ball, and a little more solid and stable on contact. Troy, TW

  • @sanjeev78781
    @sanjeev78781 3 года назад

    how would you compare this to the head graphene radical mp 2013 version?
    thanks

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      The older version Graphene Radical MP was a bit more maneuverable, slightly faster feeling, and had a bit more of a muted feel to it. This one feels a bit more solid/stable, easier plow through, and a bit more feel for the ball. Besides that, the precision, and spin potential is pretty similar. Troy, TW

  • @tahmidtajwar4596
    @tahmidtajwar4596 3 года назад

    How does it compare to Gravity Tour and Speed MP?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +2

      A little more pop and slightly firmer than Gravity Tour, but also offers a bit more precision than the Speed MP, with the 98 headsize. Troy, TW

  • @WE-vd8ux
    @WE-vd8ux 3 года назад

    How would you compare it to the Prince Textreme Tour 100 310?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +2

      The Prince Textreme Tour 100 (310) packs a bit easier power, and spin, whereas the Radical MP has a bit more control, and precision. The comfort level is pretty close between the two, and the Tour 100 (310) feels a bit more maneuverable or headlight, and the Radical MP packs a bit more plow. Troy, TW

    • @WE-vd8ux
      @WE-vd8ux 3 года назад +1

      @@tenniswarehouse thanks Troy, really appreciate.
      Have ordered the prince at TWH!

  • @Limekiln100
    @Limekiln100 3 года назад

    Is this more arm frIendly than the Graphene Touch Radical MP?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      Pretty similar, but maybe just slightly more comfort with this one. Troy, TW

  • @HN-lq1vw
    @HN-lq1vw 3 года назад

    Do you mind telling me what string and how many pounds you two are using?

  • @maccann2040
    @maccann2040 3 года назад

    what differences between MP and PRO?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      The Pro is has more mass, which correlates to a bit more stable feel, and plow through. The MP maneuvers a bit easier. Troy, TW

  • @icemandl6
    @icemandl6 3 года назад +1

    Interesting racquet! How does it compare to the 360+ Speed MP?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      A bit more precision, and feel for the ball with this one. Troy, TW

    • @K4R3N
      @K4R3N 3 года назад

      Yeah already using the Speed MP, these specs look close

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      @@K4R3N yes, very close in weight maneuverability factor, but the 98 head gives a bit added precision, and the thinner beam at tip and throat helps add some feel. Troy, TW

    • @K4R3N
      @K4R3N 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse man Troy I already hit too much off center on the 100 Speed MP, will get to Radical once my game improves. Wanna demo that new Dunlop CX 200 Tour, wanna feel that flex (62!)

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      @@K4R3N haha I feel you, the shanks happen to the best of em'. Yeah the new Dunlop CX 200 Tours feel sweet, not much in terms of free power, but a ton of feel, and good comfort. I'm stringing one up today, and will probably put a bit of weight around 10/2. Troy, TW

  • @fluffy_skye
    @fluffy_skye 3 года назад +1

    I’ve been using Clash 100 and now looking for a racket with more control. I’m really concerned with vibration on the wrist. Is the radical mp 2021 comfortable for wrist and arm?
    Also, how about 360+ speed mp? I see it has RA rating 64. Is it more comfortable than radical?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      Both the Speed and the Radical have decent comfort, however if you want good comfort, we recommend the Gravity MP or Tour, and the Blade 98 v7. Troy, TW

    • @fluffy_skye
      @fluffy_skye 3 года назад +1

      @@tenniswarehouse Thanks, just saw your reply! After some trial, I’m now in between Radical MP and Gravity Tour.

  • @cholodoc6253
    @cholodoc6253 3 года назад

    Hi... How can be comparate with the old IG radical PRO?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      That old IG Radical Pro was a bit more flexible, slightly more plush feeling, and swung with a bit more heft. This one is slightly more firm, slightly more maneuverable, and maybe a bit more pop. Also, the grip shape changed slightly, so this newer Radical has a more round/square shape pallet, similar to like a Wilson, or Prince, and the older IG Radicals had more of that rectangular shape to the pallet. Troy, TW

    • @cholodoc6253
      @cholodoc6253 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse thank u troy, i appreciate :)

  • @santhoship2677
    @santhoship2677 3 года назад

    How does this racket compare with speed mp and gravity mp

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      It is slightly closer to the Speed MP in terms of flex/stiffness, but offers a bit more precision from that 98 headsize, and a bit more feel for the ball with a slightly thinner beam at the top and throat regions. The Gravity MP offers the slightly bigger sweet-spot like the Speed MP, but likely has the most comfort, and bit more flexible plush feel on contact. Feel wise, it actually is a bit more similar to the old Radical MP racquets (pre-Graphene), but with a bit bigger head at 100, and easier spin than those 18x20's. Troy, TW

    • @santhoship2677
      @santhoship2677 3 года назад

      Thank u i decided to buy the speed mp what tension do you recommond i use tourbite or hyper g

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      @@santhoship2677 , We usually string around 52 or 53 with that type of string on a racquet like this. However the tension is a personal preference things, some of us prefer looser, for those that hit with a lot of spin, and don't like a stiff feel on the arms, and some like it tighter for those who hit flatter, and don't care how stiff it feels. Troy, TW

  • @alexdimbel
    @alexdimbel 3 года назад

    What about comfort this vs vcore 98?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      Comfort is pretty close between the two, but maybe just slightly better with this Radical MP 2021. It feels just slightly more solid on contact. Troy, TW

  • @hamaja18
    @hamaja18 3 года назад +9

    I see Kristen in the thumbnail, I click.
    Nice bait.

  • @eujhin24789
    @eujhin24789 3 года назад +1

    Hi TW, how does the graphene 360+ radical mp compare to the speed mp? Which one did the play testers prefer more?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      @eujhin24789,
      Depends on who you ask! I prefer the Radical for a bit more power while some of the other playtesters would prefer the Speed for the feel and added control. Both are great racquets.
      Michelle, TW

  • @peterjohnperpetua8898
    @peterjohnperpetua8898 3 года назад

    This or yonex vcore 95?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      This one offers a bit easier access to power, and feels slightly less maneuverable with a bit higher swingweight, and a bit less headlight. The VCORE 95 is a bit more precise, offers a bit more feel, and feels a bit more maneuverable in stock form. I have a slight preference for the VCORE 95, but our playtesters enjoy this update of the Radical MP as well. What racquet have you been using? Troy, TW

    • @peterjohnperpetua8898
      @peterjohnperpetua8898 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse hi troy! Thank you for prompt response, im currently using Pro Kennex q+ kinetic 315, i like my current racket but the weight is now starting to get on me, im playing lots of doubles and one handed backhand, and radical mp and yonex vcore95 are my current choices if i will change my racket

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      I see, that gives me a better idea of where you are coming from, for the racquet. I think if maneuverability is what you are seeking, the VCORE 95 will feel nice and maneuverable, while providing great control, and is fairly spin friendly for a 95. The Radical feels a bit more stable, and a bit easier plow through, but not quite as easy to maneuver, and whip around, but maybe a bit more stable on the volleys. Hope that helps. Troy, TW

    • @peterjohnperpetua8898
      @peterjohnperpetua8898 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse thank you so much troy very helpful also thank you for your time. God bless you!

  • @dylan_lynch05
    @dylan_lynch05 3 года назад

    I need some help. I can not for the life of me decide between the Radical mp and Radical s. Can y'all help?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      We have a preference for the Radical MP over the Radical S, as it is a bit heavier, more stable, and has pretty good feel and precision. That said, we would usually recommend the MP to a strong intermediate to advanced level player. The Radical S is a bit more forgiving, in that it is a bit lighter, easier to maneuver, and has a bigger sweet-spot. So we like the MP a lot, but I guess it comes down to your playing level, and preferences. Troy, TW

    • @dylan_lynch05
      @dylan_lynch05 3 года назад

      @@tenniswarehouse Thanks. How big of a difference in power level is there between the 2?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      Not huge, but playing with both you should be able to feel the difference in power, and forgiveness, with the S being a bit easier to use and create power. The MP will be a bit more demanding, but when striking the ball cleanly, could be more rewarding with the plow through and precision. Troy, TW

    • @dylan_lynch05
      @dylan_lynch05 3 года назад

      Have you ever played with the first generation of the Head Tour Pro. If you have, what is a small comparison of that and the radicals

  • @atwntennisclub
    @atwntennisclub 3 года назад

    Man I'm really in between this and the gravity tour

    • @fluffy_skye
      @fluffy_skye 3 года назад

      Me Too! Tell me when you make the call!

  • @Laura-lv1ke
    @Laura-lv1ke 3 года назад

    Trying to decide between this & the Ezone 98, leaning towards the Radical after this review I think so thank you! (ngl abt 80% of the reason I'm considering the Ezone is that Naomi Osaka cosmetic haha, the white & gold looks so good!)

    • @tomr1056
      @tomr1056 3 года назад

      I'm demoing both of those rackets for a week, starting tomorrow :) Have you tried them both?

    • @Laura-lv1ke
      @Laura-lv1ke 3 года назад

      @@tomr1056 Unfortunately TW don't demo in my country & neither racquet is available from any of the places I know that do demos here, but I know someone with an Ezone so i'll try that out once lockdown eases.
      For the Radical i'm going mostly on specs/reviews & the fact that I've always loved any Head racquet I've used as my main.

    • @tomr1056
      @tomr1056 3 года назад

      @@Laura-lv1ke I'll let you know what I think tomorrow!

    • @Laura-lv1ke
      @Laura-lv1ke 3 года назад

      @@tomr1056 Thankyou!!

    • @tomr1056
      @tomr1056 3 года назад

      @@Laura-lv1ke Hey, well I played with both yesterday. I'd say they're both very nice rackets, it just depends what suits you.
      The Ezone has some good power without it being too much, it has good control and feels very nice and has a good size sweet spot, it didn't seem to have great top spin (and it was strung with Babolat RPM's). The Head reminded me a fair bit of my two Wilson Blades, particularly the 2015 version (which has a bit more power than the V7), although it feels better than that Blade. It is rather low powered and has a smaller sweet spot, but apart from that is very good. It has great control, spin, touch and feel. After playing with it for a while I realised that if I was swinging well and hitting in the sweet spot it did move the ball very nicely and had enough power but it isn't as easy as the Yonex due to that smaller sweet spot but, you could say (depending on how you hit) it is easier in one way, as it has more spin potential so you can control the ball better like that.
      Generally speaking I would say the Head suits the more athletic/advanced player who can use their power to move the ball well without a lot of free power in the racket, and the Yonex more for someone who needs more free power and who hits flatter.
      Where do you live Laura? I'm in England, we have been allowed to play again for the last two weeks! :D

  • @scottbaker1991
    @scottbaker1991 3 года назад

    Can anyone compare this to the microgel and/or flexpoint versions?

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      This one is a bit more firm, feels a bit more stable, and packs a bit more power. It is a nice middle-ground between some of those classic Radical MP racquets, and some of the more stiff Graphene versions that came before this one. Troy, TW

  • @marvyeap
    @marvyeap 3 года назад +1

    Do you think they will update the color scheme of the 360+ speed line? Don’t like the glossy white and black

    • @cd8145
      @cd8145 3 года назад

      There’s a black paintjob coming

    • @marvyeap
      @marvyeap 3 года назад

      CD, oh thank you. How do you know?

    • @cd8145
      @cd8145 3 года назад +1

      @@marvyeap They said on the previous podcast, also on Talk Tennis forum

    • @marvyeap
      @marvyeap 3 года назад

      C D thanks CD

  • @oscaralvaresfonseca1458
    @oscaralvaresfonseca1458 3 года назад

    I train 4 hrs a day for 6 days per week, I had been using a head prestige mp, but the weight is too heavy for me, and my arm suffer that, I been looking for a racquet that gives me control and feel around the 295gr-305gr, what racquet do you recommend: wilson blade 98 16x19, radical mp or some another recomendation that you give me, also im looking for a racquet that dont give me arm issues in the future

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      My first thought was the Blade 98 16x19 v7, nice and comfortable, with pretty good feel. I might also consider the Radical MP, a bit firmer but still pretty solid and decently comfortable. I might also consider the Tecnifibre TF40 305, and Dunlop CX 200. Troy, TW

  • @rodbernsonsupnet1912
    @rodbernsonsupnet1912 2 года назад

    What size are you using for the play test? Currently using a size #2 with no overgrip w/Yonex. Looking to see what size I should get .

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад

      Most of the playtest racquets that we are sent, are usually #2 or #3. It seems lately, the majority have been #2 grip size, but sometimes they will send us a couple of each racquet, #2 and #3 grip size. I would say go with what feels best in your hand, and not necessarily what we use. Troy, TW

  • @llamawizard
    @llamawizard 3 года назад +2

    No way y’all can feel 5 grams of added weight.
    That less than the weight of an over grip.

  • @ninaenvivo
    @ninaenvivo 3 года назад

    Traduzcan o hagan revisión en español

  • @rolderdrummer2448
    @rolderdrummer2448 3 года назад +2

    Great specs, only that color for god sake...

    • @VeganViolaPlayer
      @VeganViolaPlayer 3 года назад

      Why? What's wrong with blinding orange? 😛

    • @DKVanya
      @DKVanya 3 года назад

      Just bought mine. I prefer the old paint job

  • @jakobolesen4450
    @jakobolesen4450 3 года назад

    Hi, can you compare this vs Prince textreme tour 100p (2019 model)- Spin, comfort, control and power -Thanks

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +2

      This one is a bit more precise, and just slightly more spin friendly, with a bit higher launch angle. The Textreme Tour 100P packs a bit easier power, a bit bigger sweet-spot, and feels slightly more comfortable. Troy, TW

  • @michas6488
    @michas6488 3 года назад +2

    I have a problem with TW reviews - each one I run seems really similar and all the racquets are great. Basically I could cut out word 'Radical', place 'Gravity' in this video and noone would notice anything :P There is not much constructive critique in all the reviews I've seen, these seem all more like a racquets Ads rather than actual reviews.
    And now I cannot really choose between Radical, Gravity or Speed - or at least those review doesn't help me at all. I will have to just pick a trials and test them all myself.

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад +1

      @Michal S,
      Sorry to hear that, we would love to go on and on in our videos, but reserve that for our full written reviews where we go in further depth. Happy to help answer any questions. But as you mention, the best way to figure out what racquet is best for you is to demo them! However, with the Gravity vs. Radical -- the Gravity will have more feel, more control, more precision while the Radical will feel a bit more powerful, a little more stiff and offer more power and spin. Happy to help answer any more questions you may have, just let us know!
      Michelle, TW

  • @olivercarpenter2663
    @olivercarpenter2663 2 года назад

    Google

  • @racketback
    @racketback 2 года назад

    I don't recommend any head rackets. It's like a toy and the ball is flying.

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  2 года назад +1

      As far as the ball is flying, maybe that is what you experienced with the Head racquets that you have tried. But as far as feeling like a toy, that is hard to believe, when it comes to racquets like the Head Prestige Tour, Gravity Pro, or Pro Tour 2.0, those are all examples of pretty solid feeling racquets, and pretty good control as well. Troy, TW

  • @BK-ks2sf
    @BK-ks2sf 3 года назад +4

    Really ugly paint jobs

  • @LarzB
    @LarzB 3 года назад +1

    What a horrible candy cane color... Why are they increasing all swing weights? Why all their current mp rackets have to be close to 330 sw? Do not like that.

    • @userdjee834
      @userdjee834 3 года назад +1

      when you make a frame softer it bends more on impact, so it needs more (swing)weight to provide power

    • @LarzB
      @LarzB 3 года назад

      @@userdjee834 yeah i know that, but i have played with more flexible rackets that have more power than the head rackets (Wilson clash, prince Phantom, etc) with less swing weight, so there are other ways to improve power if needed. Head should innovate more, they are lagging.

    • @クリームイカ
      @クリームイカ 3 года назад

      @@LarzB Then just go and use those racquets right? Higher sw is better

    • @LarzB
      @LarzB 3 года назад +2

      @@クリームイカ no, higher isn't better. Higher gives more plow through, but also makes your swing slower, reaction time slower, lower manouverability depending on what you can handle. I get issues with late timing and joint pains when the swing weight is too high. For me the best swing weight is between 320 and 325, above that does not suit my play style and joints.

    • @BlurryAznboy101
      @BlurryAznboy101 3 года назад

      @@LarzB Novak has the heaviest racket on tour, name someone better who uses a light sw racket?

  • @geb3672
    @geb3672 3 года назад +1

    This was a great review! How would you compare this to the Head Gravity Tour? I want something with a little more control, feel and maybe spin, with a little less power comparatively. Thanks!

    • @tenniswarehouse
      @tenniswarehouse  3 года назад

      It could potentially be a good option. The 98 head gives a bit more precision, and it is a bit firmer, and maybe a bit more solid feeling, as well as a bit easier spin, compared to the Gravity Tour. Troy, TW