The Daughters of the Confederacy 2023
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 авг 2024
- The Daughter’s of the Confederacy, are the worst. Right up there with the Son’s of the Confederacy. Not just heavily steeped in racism, but it was founded on it. And they’re proud AF. It’s gross.
United Daughters of the Confederacy… Moms For Liberty … Ron DeSantis and these other Republican governors and state legislators… same deal. The goal is to hide history from those they want to influence and from those they want to oppress. The goal: to preserve and extend the myths of white supremacy. #wakeup America. And #staywoke
Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses-such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research-as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use. No infringement intended.
Dude..... I live up in Western Kentucky and we didn't join the Confederacy till right at the very end. You know this gives me a very unique outlook on all of this, and I can tell you for 100 percent fact that the men that served in the Confederate Army was not fighting for slavery. In fact they was poor farmers that didn't even own slaves. The question we should be asking is how the democrats convinced our people to go die for something that they had no reason to fight for🤔
The Confederacy was founded upon white supremacy according to its vice president. The Southern declarations of secession of the deep South at least name slavery as the main issue. And when those states send commissioners to convince other slave states to join, their main points are slavery and white supremacy. Apostles of Disunion by Charles Dew is a great little book that talks about this. Even poor white farmers were happy to be above slaves in the social hierarchy.
Union army atrocities on civilians.
I dont think they are vile. People die in wars and they get memorials
The United Daughter of the Confederacy has a building in Richmond Va with black security guards.
No, they don’t.
@@zenever0 they absolutely do. I walk by it almost daily and know each guard.
@@DemureAndMindful you can be anything you want on the internet. Are you suggesting that the UDC isn't a white supremacy organization because they hire a few black folks? www.civilwarmonuments.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/49957157332_ef9fe051a5_o-1024x659.jpg
@@zenever0 I 100% believe they are a white supremacy group. I know people in RVA that work in establishments they refuse to have blacks serve them. I was at lunch 2 weeks ago when a group of them came to dine and they were appalled to see a black woman eating right next to them. I was pointing out they try to disguise their racism by hiring blacks as security (which they do)Those security guards guard the building like sambo would guard massa’s house
@@DemureAndMindful ....Well...looks like the UDC is Not racist is it? Thats more than Incan say for that guy that concurred up this Video!
Nice that you accurately detail American history (which you do). It's a shame you mislead on contemporary events and recent history. I attended exclusively public schools all over America (including in the South) from 1970 to 1982 and was never taught the "white supremacy" you claim is still perpetuated. I have seven of eight great-grandfathers (one was too old) who fought in Union regiments to preserve the Union and end slavery (including from Maryland and Virginia). Fortunately, all survived the conflict despite the horrors they experienced to end slavery (including one interned at Andersonville).
If "we don't document and communicate, the history is lost." Whom are you referring to when you say we? Americans? Or as you seem to imply, minority Americans? Strange.
If the history is lost, how is it a white boy from rural Appalachia grew up learning about Crispus Attucks, the Northwest Ordinance (banning slavery in 1787 in the first expansion of America), America banning the importation of slaves in 1808, Bess Colemen, Madam C.J. Walker, George Washington Carver, Marcus Garvey, the American Colonization Society, 54th Mass, Frederick Douglas, Harriet Tubman, Booker T Washington, the rise of fraternal organizations organized by black men post Civil-War, the raft of black state legislators between 1870 and 1910 (until racist efforts kept them out of office) across the deep south.... so much more. I'm not sure what schools you went to, but I'd suggest you get on the school board and change the curriculum.
We are not "living the history that might be hidden from out children in the future." That is nonsense. The fact that so few people give two flips about history does not mean it is hidden. Folks just need to stop being lazy and blaming others. Why are you using race to make your point? DeSantis and "other Republicans" are not hiding history. For starters, the historical wrongs you are (correctly) bemoaning were largely the work of the Democratic Party, not Republicans. As far as keeping demonstrably racist content out of schools, you should be applauding them for doing so. Who in their right mind tells children they are inherently "racist" because of the color of their skin? Ah, probably a racist. And that is the content the Republicans are seeking to keep out, not our history.
Thank you for correctly noting the history of groups seeking to re-paint history. But please be careful, you appear to be doing the same on contemporary history.
so so eloquent for a racist deplorable.
It is the blacks that are perpetuating this hate. I am from the South and I never heard anyone talking about colored people, in fact I knew some and we would say good morning to each other. Not all colored people do this hate thing!
Great anecdote. The rest of your comments coyly slides into white supremacy propaganda that incorrectly frames critical race theory as “racist” when it’s actually a college level theory of racism. It frames an argument of Dems vs. Reps which is simply white supremacy propaganda to distract from the issue of the confederate traitors defending the infernal institution of African slavery.
(1860) Confederates traitors are made up of white southern conservatives.
(1865) KKK is made up of white southern conservatives.
(1865-1890) Black codes are made up by white southern conservatives.
(1896-1968) Jim Crow laws are made up by white southern conservatives.
(1954-1968) Civil rights are opposed by white southern conservatives.
(1967-2023) Interracial marriages are opposed by white southern conservatives.
(2001-2013) Gay marriage is opposed by white southern conservatives.
(2023) Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DEI) is opposed by white southern conservatives.
@ColonelChrisWyatt,,.. the only people who are tying to 'whitewash' history...is HIM! In am a White Civil war historian... and I have just as many Black people in my Civil war Histories that I have read and tell about as White. Including black men who Served alongside White Confederate soldiers.. and I don't mean just as 'cooks' or teamsters. This fellow must be stuck on himself and his color. The War was NEVER about slavery. States Rights are Very Much a 'thing' Even today! HE just doesn't know what States Rights ARE! The WAR was pretty much caused by exactly the same thing Our First Revolution was Done for... High,Ridiculous Taxes,, High Tariffs on Agricultural goods, and Duties on Other Crops Being shipped to England and France. THOSE..had to do with the Run of the Mill Southerners Life... Slavery did Not!! The North Invaded the South First... Because the south Legally LEFT the U.S... THAT is what the war was about...to FORCE the South back in to the Union! Lincoln used slavery as a Scheme after 2 years of war ( and freeing NO Slaves!) the 'emancipation proclamation'...to Free slaves Only in Southern states that the Union had Invaded... To Replace Dead and Wounded 'White' Union soldiers that had been Killed or Wounded in the First 2 years of the War...And the Big 'bloodletting' at Antietam (battle) .
Most confederates couldnt give a toss about supremacy over blacks. The majority fought against the supremacy and biased prosperity of the north, that favoured itself, creating a north/south divide that is mirrored in england today!
Most wealth was in the north, the south, largely lived in poverty. Its obvious, every enlisted confederate wasnt a plantation owner, most were poor people that didnt, and couldnt afford a slave, if they even thought of it.
Only a few were wealthy plantation owners, stands to reason!
Most objected to being ordered about and ignored by the wealthy north, and were poor people fighting for their own state. At bull run, and other battles, some confederates fought barefooted with rocks, because of poverty and lack of funds and supplies.
You cant blame poverty stricken southerners rising up against the oppressive northern dictators!
Youhave to admire their stand!
You’re just spreading white supremacy propaganda. The confederates fought to maintain the tyranny of African slavery.
The first federal census of 1790 counted 697,897 slaves; by 1810, there were 1.2 million slaves, a 70 percent increase. Atlantic Slave trade was banned in 1807. By 1850 there was 3.2 million slaves. By 1860 there was 3.95 million slaves. 25% of southern households had slaves. In some states like Mississippi, 50% of households had at least 1 slave.
(1860) Confederates traitors are made up of white southern conservatives.
(1865) KKK is made up of white southern conservatives.
(1865-1890) Black codes are made up by white southern conservatives.
(1896-1968) Jim Crow laws are made up by white southern conservatives.
(1954-1968) Civil rights are opposed by white southern conservatives.
(1967-2023) Interracial marriages are opposed by white southern conservatives.
(2001-2013) Gay marriage is opposed by white southern conservatives.
(2023) Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DEI) is opposed by white southern conservatives.
We’ll always remember that Confederates are traitors and white supremacists 🇺🇸
What you are doing here is called denialism.
@@azazel166 not so!
what are you talking about? the north wasn’t oppressive at all. the only reason the south was poor was because plantation owners held almost all the wealth in the south and because of this the common people of the south had an incredibly low standard of living. it was not the oppression from the north that made them poor it was the top 1% at the time who took away any chance of the small farmers to compete with the southern gentry who held almost all of the land and wealth. the fact that you believe anything that you said is insane to me
@@shietcard9649
Thats because you are insane. The
South wasn't wall to wall plantations and their owners!
If you research the uprising, as I said, the north, compared to the South was far wealthier.
Plantation owners profited from cheap labour to pick expensive yields. This still goes on everywhere in 2024!
Owners flourished from these crops, but the north was much wealthier.
Most enlisted men resented the north's dictatorship and lack of finance directed at the south. These men were NOT wealthy plantation owners. Just men trying to earn livings of their own!
south didn't have wall to wall plantations and their owners!