people don't understand how ridiculous the F-22 really is, it isn't an air superiority fighter, it isn't an air supremacy fighter, its an air DOMINANCE fighter. It can turn so hard it can kill its pilot the only times its been detected by radar, is when its weapons bay is open, its been equipped with axillary fuel tanks, or has had radar reflectors attached the only time its been bested in mock combat is when its had its 8000lbs axillary fuel tanks attached, in a dogfight, thats like attaching a ford F-450 under each wing and even then it would probably delete the enemy fighter from 500 kms away
And that's America's problem, they aren't part of enough conflicts, so these F-22 aren't being used, and since sixth gen is on it's way, they'll have to retire the F-22 without even using it to their full capabilities, so either they sell them to countries for a lot of money in an attempt to make their money back, or just expand on the F-22 like they did with the F-18, from the Hornet to the Super Hornet, from the Raptor to the Super Raptor, or their third option is to simply suck it up and make a new jet, or they could bring back the YF-23 Black Widow.
it wasnt, you can see how it has 2 engines on the back, the f-35 has a single engine, it still might not be an f-22 (but it probably is) but it cant be an f-35
@@twinblocker9520 No, it only has one engine. Also, if you pause it at the right time, you can the its the model of the F-35 Lighting II. One more thing, on the bottom, you can see that there are words saying, "F-35, not F-22)
No it doesn't lmao, pause it at the last second u can see TWO shock diamonds from guess what 2 engines, I can screenshot it and send it to you if u want lmao
It is an F-35, the video is recorded in England, it is an RAF base where only F-35s are operated (RAF Lakenheath), it has 1 engine and the original video states it's an F35 and this video does too.@@twinblocker9520
The hydraulics run at about 8000PSI in order to open and close the massive doors in under a second, I’m not sure how true it is, but I have a buddy in the airforce who told me that the missile is actually dropped before the doors are open, and by the time the doors have opened fully, the missile has already ignited and on its way to the target
Doubtfully. While it was slightly faster and a little more stealthy, the F-22 was far more manurable and the YF-23 could only carry 4 medium range missiles total in it's 2 internal bays. The F-22 can carry 6 in it's one. 2 missiles is a big difference, even one missile is a big difference, as it can be the difference between needing to rearm and then potentially dying because of it, or getting the kill.
@@Ripa-Moramee I did say would have. YF-23 was ages ago, and doesn't have the same updated technologies or armament capacity as the current F-22. If it's development continued up until today, and it was involved in the ngad program, the yf-23 could probably have bested the F-22. It does by default when it comes to looks too. F-22 is cool but ugly asf
@@willt9721 Damn don't know where you got that information from, but the YF-23 was developed alongside the YF-22 (which became the F-22) in running for the air dominance contract of that time, so if it was chosen over the YF-22, the F-22 would never have existed and therefore the F-23 would have no rival, so obviously it never would be in for NGAD, that's just ridiculous. Design has progressed a lot since then, so no the YF-23 would never have been in the running for the NGAD, so it doesn't matter how you phrase your comment, it's still wrong.
@@Ripa-Moramee The F-22 would have been what the YF-23 is today. An unused project. Does that mean that it would be used in an NGAD program? How would we know it wouldn't? I'm just saying, it would be plausible if the YF-23 was inducted into some optimisation program like NGAD if it was chosen. Doesn't have to be exactly NGAD. Also disagree about the design aspect, the F-22's appearance is overrated as hell. It looks like a tacky, grotesque, grey abomination of steel. The angular flaps are what people apparently enjoy about it. Besides practicality it just makes it look like a smooth flying rock. The YF-23 is different. It's alienish and new. It's a testament to the engineering innovation and minds of the US, a step forward aviation. A pinnacle that screams air dominance and exceptionalism. Nothing can pair with it, nothing even looks like it.
Забавно читать как люди спорят что же лучше "F-22" или "Су-57". Сразу задам вопрос, как вы можете сравнивать характеристики этих самолетов, когда они засекречены?)) Далее скажу, что F-22 это легкий истребитель, а Су-57 тяжелый. Это 2 разных самолета, предназначенные для разных задач. P. S. Единственные люди с которым я согласен, это те, кто говорит, что оба этих самолёта безполезны, так как их просто не используют и не будут использовать без серьёзных на то причин. Гараздо выгоднее использовать универсальные F-15, F-16, F-18, Су-27, Миг-29, Су-33 и Су-34, просто потому что они дешевле. Какой смысл использовать самолёт, если цена его эксплуатации (и не дай бог потери) выше чем сбитый самолёт противника? P. P. S. Не стоить верить всему, что пишут в интернете.
P. P. P. S. XD. Прочёл пару комментариев на тему их сверх маневренности. Хоть и не известны их действительные Лётные характеристики, в их маневренности я не сомневаюсь, проблема в том, что человек не способен реализовать эту "сверх маневренность", для этого, эти самолёты должны быть беспилотные.
Although the SU 57 is a 5th generation fighter, like the f22. The f22 is the most technologically advanced plane in the skies. The SU 57 was a less capable plane as it was more poorly built, it is still one of the best planes, but not the best.
@@Pyreax865 not even, not only does it have a smaller radar signature than all 4th generation aircraft but it cruises faster than most of them, and it could be worse, it could be china's "baked in stealth" J-20, which according to the Taiwanese who claimed to have detected the J-20 has a radar cross section comparable to that of an F-16
@@TachankaRil the Hornet has a lower RCS, the Eurofighter can supercruise as well, and the J-20 is another horrible fighter/interceptor, if I’m correct the J-20 had external fuel tanks and that increased its RCS.
@@Pyreax865 no the hornet doesn't, a CLEAN super hornet has the same RCS, key words being a clean super hornet which (believe it or not) isn't the case usually, another note is this is referring to current Su-57's RCS, they're supposedly improving it's stealth in between now and 2025
![NoCap - Maliboo [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FUV7E0QyniU/mqdefault.jpg)
people don't understand how ridiculous the F-22 really is, it isn't an air superiority fighter, it isn't an air supremacy fighter, its an air DOMINANCE fighter.
It can turn so hard it can kill its pilot
the only times its been detected by radar, is when its weapons bay is open, its been equipped with axillary fuel tanks, or has had radar reflectors attached
the only time its been bested in mock combat is when its had its 8000lbs axillary fuel tanks attached, in a dogfight, thats like attaching a ford F-450 under each wing and even then it would probably delete the enemy fighter from 500 kms away
And even when handicapped its wins most of the time with the opposing fight pilots claiming it is the hardest air to air kill they got
Okay guys so who is buying this jet on my birthday
@@S1eghai1 unfortunately I don’t have an extra 189 million laying around
@@S1eghai1and the US gov has literally forbid anyone else from buying this and almost everything is for sell asides our nukes
And that's America's problem, they aren't part of enough conflicts, so these F-22 aren't being used, and since sixth gen is on it's way, they'll have to retire the F-22 without even using it to their full capabilities, so either they sell them to countries for a lot of money in an attempt to make their money back, or just expand on the F-22 like they did with the F-18, from the Hornet to the Super Hornet, from the Raptor to the Super Raptor, or their third option is to simply suck it up and make a new jet, or they could bring back the YF-23 Black Widow.
This is amazing, it actually makes me fear the Raptor.
🛩️ 👹 👊🏻 🚀💥
0:23 was a F35 Lighting II
This edit is 🔥
Earned a sub
it wasnt, you can see how it has 2 engines on the back, the f-35 has a single engine, it still might not be an f-22 (but it probably is) but it cant be an f-35
@@twinblocker9520 No, it only has one engine. Also, if you pause it at the right time, you can the its the model of the F-35 Lighting II. One more thing, on the bottom, you can see that there are words saying, "F-35, not F-22)
No it doesn't lmao, pause it at the last second u can see TWO shock diamonds from guess what 2 engines, I can screenshot it and send it to you if u want lmao
@@twinblocker9520 nah
alr send me a pic
It is an F-35, the video is recorded in England, it is an RAF base where only F-35s are operated (RAF Lakenheath), it has 1 engine and the original video states it's an F35 and this video does too.@@twinblocker9520
THIS GOSE SO HARD DEAR GOD
dude, i love this edit
F-22A Raptor is stealth until it opens its bombay which is why I believe they close it immediately after they launch a missile/drop a bomb.
No point in keeping it open if there's no longer need to fire missiles and they don't have stealth
The hydraulics run at about 8000PSI in order to open and close the massive doors in under a second,
I’m not sure how true it is, but I have a buddy in the airforce who told me that the missile is actually dropped before the doors are open, and by the time the doors have opened fully, the missile has already ignited and on its way to the target
So the missile phases through the bomb bay door? THATS SICK
Bro just cooks F-22 and Freddie Dredd like fire.
If you know this plane is there, you weren't the target
It’s so stealthy right
The French delta wing over the desert: um I think a black dot appeared in my radar oh it’s a raptor
The RAFALE 👹 🛩️🔥
It’s been a fevered dream to pilot one of these ever since I was a kid. An low key I might join up 🫡
Great editing! Nice channel - just sub'd. Your first 500 are your toughest!
BRO THAT WAS A W EDIT (Goosebumps)
Just imagining how humans would dominate the dinosaurs even the flying ones with these
Love, love, love this jet!!
F-22 will always live on
100th sub cause this is actually amazing
F-22 🗿🍷💪
🔥
nice Edit
insane edit! how do you only have 52 subs ;-;
The famous American stealth, as the Serbs say, "they forgot to warn us that it is invisible"
good edit bro
Dam this edit is FIREEEEE 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥👍👍👍👍🫡🫡🫡🫡
Real villain on air war
Song is devils work by freddie dredd btw
The reds really punching the air rn
Northrop YF-23 would've been the only thing in the skies to rival this
Doubtfully. While it was slightly faster and a little more stealthy, the F-22 was far more manurable and the YF-23 could only carry 4 medium range missiles total in it's 2 internal bays. The F-22 can carry 6 in it's one. 2 missiles is a big difference, even one missile is a big difference, as it can be the difference between needing to rearm and then potentially dying because of it, or getting the kill.
@@Ripa-Moramee I did say would have. YF-23 was ages ago, and doesn't have the same updated technologies or armament capacity as the current F-22. If it's development continued up until today, and it was involved in the ngad program, the yf-23 could probably have bested the F-22.
It does by default when it comes to looks too. F-22 is cool but ugly asf
@@willt9721 Damn don't know where you got that information from, but the YF-23 was developed alongside the YF-22 (which became the F-22) in running for the air dominance contract of that time, so if it was chosen over the YF-22, the F-22 would never have existed and therefore the F-23 would have no rival, so obviously it never would be in for NGAD, that's just ridiculous. Design has progressed a lot since then, so no the YF-23 would never have been in the running for the NGAD, so it doesn't matter how you phrase your comment, it's still wrong.
@@willt9721 also you clearly have poor taste as 99% of people agree the F-22 is the coolest looking aircraft on the planet, the YF-23 is the ugly one.
@@Ripa-Moramee The F-22 would have been what the YF-23 is today. An unused project. Does that mean that it would be used in an NGAD program? How would we know it wouldn't? I'm just saying, it would be plausible if the YF-23 was inducted into some optimisation program like NGAD if it was chosen. Doesn't have to be exactly NGAD.
Also disagree about the design aspect, the F-22's appearance is overrated as hell. It looks like a tacky, grotesque, grey abomination of steel. The angular flaps are what people apparently enjoy about it. Besides practicality it just makes it look like a smooth flying rock.
The YF-23 is different. It's alienish and new. It's a testament to the engineering innovation and minds of the US, a step forward aviation. A pinnacle that screams air dominance and exceptionalism. Nothing can pair with it, nothing even looks like it.
„You should go home now.“
👹👹👹👹👹
As a holder of this display name I am proud
Love the raptor… but personally… I’m partial to the yf-23
The only thing limiting the F-22 is its pilot.
I imagine one of the next components to go with the rise of AI
nice we used the same clips lol
the unrestricted takeoff clip was an f35
I think the clip of the flyby was an f-35
edit: nvm i just realized the text at the bottom
RAPTOR, DER NAME STIMMT 😊
sub with notifications moment
nice bro
sigma
👹👹👹👹👹👹👹👹
a few of the clips were F-35s
Would you intercept me?
Hate to break it to you but the jet in that takeoff clip is an F-35A.
Read the fine print at the bottom of the video
@@mortalwombat7461 dude thought he was sum, but in reality he jus don't know how to read 😭😭
it might be the F-16 fighting falcon, because the wing shape, and it only has one rudder, also you can see the intake on the bottom of the fuselage
@@tannerbanananerit’s not it’s an f35
That was an F35 taking off from an airfield in britain@@aid_rap9474
Um actualy🤓 the one clip was a f35😎😎😎
ermm actually read the fine print 🤓 🤓
hey its not our fault that the enemy lied about what they had - HLC
aliens cant even win
Забавно читать как люди спорят что же лучше "F-22" или "Су-57". Сразу задам вопрос, как вы можете сравнивать характеристики этих самолетов, когда они засекречены?))
Далее скажу, что F-22 это легкий истребитель, а Су-57 тяжелый. Это 2 разных самолета, предназначенные для разных задач.
P. S. Единственные люди с которым я согласен, это те, кто говорит, что оба этих самолёта безполезны, так как их просто не используют и не будут использовать без серьёзных на то причин. Гараздо выгоднее использовать универсальные F-15, F-16, F-18, Су-27, Миг-29, Су-33 и Су-34, просто потому что они дешевле. Какой смысл использовать самолёт, если цена его эксплуатации (и не дай бог потери) выше чем сбитый самолёт противника?
P. P. S. Не стоить верить всему, что пишут в интернете.
P. P. P. S. XD.
Прочёл пару комментариев на тему их сверх маневренности. Хоть и не известны их действительные Лётные характеристики, в их маневренности я не сомневаюсь, проблема в том, что человек не способен реализовать эту "сверх маневренность", для этого, эти самолёты должны быть беспилотные.
You made a terrible aircraft look pretty good. Well done.
It's not that bad
@@willt9721 I guess it has its moments
yeah its only the best one ever made
Apart from price it is the best fighter on the face of the earth@@Kroq_Gar
F-22 is the 2nd best air dominance aircraft ever, dont know how you can make such an incorrect statement
Su 57 better
Although the SU 57 is a 5th generation fighter, like the f22. The f22 is the most technologically advanced plane in the skies. The SU 57 was a less capable plane as it was more poorly built, it is still one of the best planes, but not the best.
Not at all, it’s worse than most 4th gen’s.
@@Pyreax865 not even, not only does it have a smaller radar signature than all 4th generation aircraft but it cruises faster than most of them, and it could be worse, it could be china's "baked in stealth" J-20, which according to the Taiwanese who claimed to have detected the J-20 has a radar cross section comparable to that of an F-16
@@TachankaRil the Hornet has a lower RCS, the Eurofighter can supercruise as well, and the J-20 is another horrible fighter/interceptor, if I’m correct the J-20 had external fuel tanks and that increased its RCS.
@@Pyreax865 no the hornet doesn't, a CLEAN super hornet has the same RCS, key words being a clean super hornet which (believe it or not) isn't the case usually, another note is this is referring to current Su-57's RCS, they're supposedly improving it's stealth in between now and 2025
It took ten years for Russia to make a stealth fighter, and its already inferior to the raptor
Lmfao you can hardly call the Felon “stealth”, more slightly reduced visibility with nothing else on the Raptor.
And it's not even stealth or 5 gen
Don’t worry, they’re making the checkmate! That’s obviously going to be goo- wait it just got checkmated by the F-35
Well what can rival the f22 then? Is there really nothing
And the best part is it’s not even that stealthy it’s very low visibility at best the su-57 is joke like Russia
THE DEVIL WILL BURN THAT TO THE GROUND.