Well I’m not responsible for the nukes if I was I’d put them at specific areas an mark them on the map to never forget, but you know how half of us Americans type correctly without getting shitted on by our cranky British cousins or a European since Britain left the union, plus it’s usually the idiots in charge of the nukes an the smart ones getting ordered around so yeah,
krogenx in that scenario, KJU would've call upon his unicorn to disintegrate the US air force, and then he would splash in the ocean, causing a tsunami that sinks the dirty American navy, and after seeing all of this, the American fools will overthrow their government and hand everything over to the dear leader
This WAS the Kim Jong-Un propaganda edition... there is no way that large numbers of poorly trained and malnourished soldiers would stand a chance against US expeditionary forces. By the time any US force landed, there would be no more coastal defenses and any armor or artillery that was stupid enough to poke its head out to fire at US troops would be quickly dealt with. Millions of Korean soldiers would die compared to maybe 5k US soldiers. The only reason that we've had as many casualties in over the last 16 years in the Middle East is because of stupid decisions by politicians. Also, if one nuke was shot at the US anywhere, NK would vanish in a mushroom cloud puff of smoke.
@@isrpress8604 The USA does not need to attack NK. It literally cant feed the majority of its population. They have prison camp farms where people starve to death picking food for others. THE Only way this would ever work, is if NK strikes first, and as mentioned by Tron, and also stated, NK would be on its own. Which they know. Which would mean there most likely will never be a war between those two as long as this situation is happening (NK Starving and isolated, USA happy, over feed, center of the attention most of the time) *Russia is barely helping in peace time by the way. They also have the highest homelessness/starving people among the modern countries. NK However has made it clear multiple occasions that it wants the USA off the map. Which now makes it a little more likely that this scenario that he showed, may play out. I do disagree with the video. The USA may struggle but it will not have as hard of a time as he suggests. Main reason, the USA military utilizes all aspect of its arsenal in a more fluid way. You cant sit there and tell me that the airforce will be sitting by while their outdated tanks roll up on their buddies. Not to forget these arent the old timer dummy bombs either. typically 1 shot 1 kill. NK Will give the USA issues yes. Not nearly as bad as one would think however. Thats a huge army he has but its not easy to mobilize in a wartime situation which they have never really been in vs the USA which has been at war for a good long time, and probably hasnt gone more than a couple of decades between wars the further you go back to the US Korean war. In conclusion, this video is mostly correct. You on the other hand are 100% wrong. If anything they may assist the USA for the first time, as mentioned by Putin around the time he also warned that he will Not help in anyway (NK) if they strike the USA first. NK would just become a parking lot for a Krogers.
@tron This until the US does not invade North Korean territory and overthrow the regime....i don't think Russia and China would be pleased to have US military bases on their border.
5tr3ps1l5 the only jets that indonesia have invested into is the KFX which have the possiblity to fail as the US doesnt want to give the most important tech for the jet
Iraq is largely flat and easy to move across. NK has far more mountains and easily defensible positions. I do agree that NK stands no chance, I just don't think it would be the same kind of cake walk Iraq was.
Well he did RussiavTurkey and RussiavUSA in multiple parts. Although I imagine WW3 would take more than that, he'd probably need half a video just to explain who would be on each side.
Three little words Electro-Magnetic Pulse. A nuke atop a ballistic missile of any range detonating at the top of its trajectory will EMP the neighborhood.
I doubt we would lanch nukes over getting hit with one nuke. In this case our conventional forces would be able to overwhelm their military fast enough to erase their nulear threats.
@@MikeBrown-go1pc But why would the US bother suffering more losses when it now has a perfect reason to nuke NK? Remember, the US is the only country in the world to actually use a nuke.
@ mrmoo Because there are other places around NK and no one likes radiation. Why cause a bunch of radiation over one nuclear hit when we could achieve the same level of destruction with conventional weapons pretty much uncontested? NK isn't the USSR, China or WWII Japan.. I'm confident that everything of military or government importance could be destroyed in NK with conventional weapons in a short time with a very low amount of losses. US would get global moral high ground by not nuking NK. In contrast, radiation spilling into China, SK and Russia might piss them off and if enough people get killed, China may decide to launch. Taking a low yield hit by NK but using only a massive conventional counter attack would take care in being sure not to aid in the begings of a full scale global thermal nuclear war.
I love how in all of these videos, the countries aren't allowed to use nukes except North Korea because the conflict would be completely one-sided without them.
DPRK:military budget=40 percent of total GDP CHINA:military budget=1.3 percent of total GDP (p.s. china's military budget is almost 10 times of dprk's )
*After north korea uses a nuke* Kim Jong-un: "Why did it get dark so fast?" Kim Jong-un's Generals: "It appears the U.S as sent 1,900 nukes at us" Kim Jong-un: "WORRY NOT! I the great leader will save us from th-- *North Korea is now no Korea*
why do you guys think the usa can just do that..... you guys act like the second and third largest countries aren't aren't allied and won't defend north korea...
Kilos You think Russia or China are going to go all out war to defend NK and that butt swab leader? Silly stuff that..be serious. They have nothing to gain...nothing
@@thunderbosz China desires North Korea to exist as a buffer zone. I dunno. Think about a prosperous nation on your border as a trading partner, China would benefit a lot. IMO.
(Allies NATO United Nation Western Power & Axis CSTO BRICS Eastern Power Defector Battle Plan For Liberation of south korea from north korea and invasion of north korea battle of north korea/Battle of Pyongyang Operation Peace Dragon)1:04,1:30,1:38,1:45,1:51,1:56,2:01,2:07,2:12,2:17,2:20,2:24,2:30,2:35,2:41,2:43,2:47,2:53,2:58,3:04,3:13,3:19,3:23,3:28,3:33,3:45,3:54,4:01,4:07,4:15,4:31,4:49,5:00,5:03,5:10,5:14,5:24,5:34,5:42,5:44,5:59,6:08,6:20,6:24,6:34,6:43,6:50,6:59,(7:06),7:18,7:26,7:34,7:42,8:11,8:28,8:44,8:59,9:06,9:21,9:34,9:45,9:56,10:07,10:08,10:19
And take South Korea and parts of Japan with them. Seoul is only about 30 miles from the DMZ. The North Koreans have enough artillery to reduce Seoul to rubble. The North Koreans know that they cannot win a war against the US but can threaten the US allies with destruction.
+Amazing Guy Actually, there is a chance that Japan wouldn't be in this war, because Japan isn't allowed to join any wars, and are only allowed to use their army if they get attacked themselves.
I think every sane person would prefer that this situation can be resolved diplomatically (I say this as an American myself). Unfortunately Kim keeps shit talking everyone in the region. He's asking for it.
I'm a Kiwi living in New Zealand. If the USA does go to war I here and now swear my allegiance as an allied country and supporter of the USA to do my part because if it were not for the United States intercepting the Japanese navy fleet in world war II we here in New Zealand would all be speaking Japanese.. That intercept lead to the greatest display of naval battle power ever displayed in human history and in massive causalities. Americans lost their lives so that the south pacific could be free and I'll be dammed if I'm going to let Rocket man scare me. We here in NewZealand owe a lot to the United States and I wish they taught this fact in our schools here. I would love to become an American Citizen and serve my country. I'm proud of New Zealand. But I have to take my hat off to the United States of America. I hope America never falls. I hope America is victorious. Imagine the world without America. It would be terrifying. So God Bless the American President. God Bless all Americans everywhere, God Bless America and God Bless those that disagree so that they might understand.
This is going to be one of the few times I am going to strongly disagree with your video. The US military wouldn't break a sweat destroying and invading North Korea. A lot of people though before the first Gulf War in 1990 that the US would take a lot casualties but they didn't and Iraq had a much better trained and equipment military. First of the US air power would literally destroy EVERTHING in North Korea and once the bombing campaign was over, what little is left of the North Korean military wouldn't be able to put up much of a fight against the US army and Marines. Once the US army and Marines invaded North Korea, we would cut through them like a hot knife through butter. The war wouldn't last very long. Actually the longest part of the war would be the bombing campaign!
iraq hasn't spent 70 years brainwashing its people to dig entrenched positions. Also the very mountainous terrain of north korea would make it hard for forces to sweep through like they did in the deserts of iraq.
@@shanewalker3273 Just because they have terrain on their side doesn't mean they'll know how to use it. I also don't think a country who frequently boasts about its (false) power display would go for a guerilla campaign
I like this video, however I feel your making the assumption that North Korean ground forces have parity to US ground forces, but that's not the case. Several first hand accounts from defectors tell of the training environment in North Korea. It's laughable, most of the course is conditioning and propaganda and combat training is woefully sub-par for regular troops. Their equipment is 1970 Soviet issue and night operations are virtually non-existent. A ground invasion would be done jointly with South Korea in the air, land, and sea with perhaps Japan giving Naval or Air support. Also missile defenses has been reinforced for months and modern systems should give 80%+ suppression on those 60s -70s era missile designs. We also have a large surface and submarine presence already there. While I agree there would be a lot of casualties if a sizable portion of the population doesn't bolt/defect as soon as they see us coming. There are several reports and defector intelligence indicating much of the population is being red-pilled by either the growing oppressive actions by the government and/or from information, radios, movies, and news being smuggled in from outside their borders. Overall it was a very well thought out video despite some over simplistic assumptions.
In first days of war, 25 South Korean and 42 Japanese nuclear plants gonna turn into a nation-scale Fukushima disaster due to conventional missile strikes.
You realize the only reason we didn't win the Vietnam war is because we didn't fight to win? We didn't invade the north, if we had done that we'd have won in very short order.
Ethan Deitz And what is he supposed to do ? Sit still while these idiots keep openly threatening 2 important allies and even their home territory ? Even china disapproves, tf mate
Yeah, Sadam Hussein have had much more powerful and modern military, own oil and it took few weeks to obliterate it. NK air defence and air force would last about 24 hours if hiding and about 30 minutes if trying to fight back. Their submarines are loud and would be located/destroyed within few days. As for NK army, they have no modern tanks or armoured vehicles + total US air superiority they do not stand a chance even against relatively small landing force supported by navy. N Korea's army is spread around the country and would take days to move it to landing location. Initial landing force would face relatively small number of defenders with mostly no tanks or artillery. while any arriving NK reinforcements could be nicely carpet bombed to oblivion. In open conflict NK military stand no chance.
You underestimate your enemy. Not that NK would stand a chance, but it's terrain and style of fighting would make it a tougher nut to crack than Iraq was.
You think it would take days to get enough men in NK to defend a beach head? I think they have probably been practicing that for the last several decades. Problem of the bombing of massed NK troops remains very high though. I think if NK were attacked they would immediately send everything they had into SK to muddy the lines a bit. I don't think NK could win, but ir could cause a blood bath for sure...
@@MikeBrown-go1pc You should talk to Korean war vets. Hurry before they're gone. Youd find that North Koreans are no joke on the battlefield, their ingenuity, tenacity, and fanaticism make them a dangerous opponent. A war there would best be avoided.
D1n0 Fr0g France and the UK *are* enemies. They pretend they're friends but they're only one spilled cup of tea or broken baguette away from another 100 years war.
Hypnotic blue Fireball The Us would not risk nuking North Korea, Japan would br pissed. South Korea would be very pissed (Fallout,refugies i mean nobody would want someone to be nuked less then 100,km away.) China would be terrafied, the same as SK but china realy would not want NK to be nuked. (Refugees,fallout,us troops on border etc...)
Japan want's America to do litterally anything about NK. China has already said that if North Korea fires the first shot, no matter what goes on, they will not enter the war on either side.
That would be a walkover by Saudi. Qatar is small, and its terrain is flat desert. The saudi military isnt only much bigger, but also much well equipped than Qatari military. War would be over in weeks if not days.
i dont know turkey vs iran or turkey vs saudis would be more even. we saw that turkey can withstand russia. its like united states vs north korea oh well
Also the US military is so heavily funded, and equipped with the best equipment,and NK can't even feed it's people so how is it going to beat 20000 Marines? Marines are some of the top-notch in the US military
@@tattiman9855 Vietnam had tons of Guerilla fighters and someone actually backing them the entire time. North Korea would be on it's own, and it's regime is slowly losing power as the outside world seeps in.
Jonathan Chambers wait WHAT ????? like I said the russian economy is on the edge of collapse and even with the euro most of the EU is financially viable so I don't get whether your head is up your own ass or your just stupid.
A few things to keep in mind: After a year of non-stop air and cruise missile attacks, there would be nothing left in N. Korea worth bombing. The US would not only destroy large weapons systems, but any troop gatherings, all command and control, all logistics, all munitions supplies. Basically N. Korea would not be able to move a battalion somewhere without it being attacked/destroyed. Also, I suspect most N. Koreans would quickly abandon the fight as they probably don't support the government and even if they did, how would they be fed and supplied? I see a US cakewalk.
The north korean people probably wouldnt even revolt. Theu wouldnt know how or what to do or would either be to twrrified of their government to or would listen to their government. North Korean people other than the 1% live in a shell. Its a real life dystopia.
So basically we will never see SK vs NK... As fun as these simulations may be, they don't in any way give us an idea of what a real war would look like. How well might US do if they CAN use Japan and SK? How well would SK do by itself. South Korea + US + Japan vs. North Korea + tentative support from China, as they try to avoid war with US, especially if the war was escalated to nuclear war by North Korea. IMO this seems the most realistic.
You should take a random world map, split all the countries into teams according to the colors they have, and find out which team would win a world war.
I meant the colour they have on the map. And not from the maps where the 'real' colour is shown, but the ones where countries get different colours to seperate them. In most of those, amerika, russia and china would all be on different sides, which would already make a kind of 'fair' war.
N. Korea does not have a chance to put up a fight. They can't hold their own in any of the areas where we can create damage. However, they do have a very large number of ground troops, but all the numbers in the world won't hold up against advanced aircraft and guided missiles. One year of fighting the strongest and most advanced military in the world's history, is unrealistic. Would give North Korea 3 to 4 months until they give up. Once their Armed Forces realizes that there is no supplies left, that's when the war will end.It is hopeless for them to think that they have a chance to win.
South Korea, mandoraty to serve 2 years in the military. South and US will both attack North. Bombing all their artillery and vehicles, It'd take weeks for North to surrender. I mean, US and South can use jets instead of troops to bomb the shit out of North.
??? Vietnam??? the terrain is different, no USSR to the rescue, no influx of money from other communist countries...China you might say...it won't be to their best economic interest for them to intervene against us. Don't get me wrong China has become big, however, it is not in their best interest to get into a war with their number one trading partner. In fact, most of its top trading partners are good friends of ours and N. Korea is does not make the top 10. Me the fool? I think not sir.
Juan Quiroz and then get there asses kicked and handed to them veitnam happened 50 years ago America is a lot stronger now easy adaption sure that doesn't mean they have a chance they would just be delaying the inevitable
These videos are always so well done. Despite this, I would love to see something like Japan vs China, Iran vs Saudi Arabia, North Korea vs South Korea, UK vs Russia or Brazil vs Argentina
If the US revives Project Thor, they could Kinetic Bombard the living shit out of North Korea from orbit, with tungsten rods moving at Mach 10 delivering the force of a small nuke without radiation. UMAD NKFAGS?!?!?!?!?!? Also, with our ally’s with South Korea, Japan, NATO, and even Russia, we could easily crush NK if they attacked us first. Project Thor just makes it easier to take out targets
Harambe its not realistic at this time, but if it happens, its an unfair fight, Germany is export world master, they have enough money to make an strong military, and Italy have the Vatican.. they have enough money too
Son Goku but remember the time is limited and France and Spain arguably have a stronger navy and army. Of course the German industry would eventually overrun the opposers but in the first few months anything could happen. You can also change Spain with U.K. For a "fairer" fight
"Somalia has a plentiful source of hippos for its naval attacks, however Kenyas lions may be able to launch several successful land attacks. While Kenya uses the outdated crocodile in its navy, its stealth may become useful against Somalias hippos. But Kenya must be weary of Somalias Cheetahs, they're not as vicious but are known for their agility" - Disclaimer, I have no idea if these animals are even in these countries
Kavan DuBoise OMG LMFAO 😂 I instantly started laughing so hard that the tears in my eyes made it difficult for me to finish reading your comment! Funniest comment I've seen in a long time! 👍
Hmm, I feel like he undervalues air superiority a bit. In Vietnam we(america) were not "at war" meaning we didn't have the ability to invade north vietnam or hold ground so all we did was kill people, and we were really good at it. Even though we "lost" that war statistics show we killed 12 for every 1 american killed. That came with superior weapons/equipment, 100% superior aircraft and efficient tactics to accomplish the goal of killing charlie. I think that in this scenario the US has all the same advantages plus actually being able to "conquer" territory. This means that we can make real progress in that war like put down gorillas, in case of enemy numerical superiority we can bomb the ever loving bejesus out of them without any interference which would give ample opportunity for marines to establish a beach head. I don't think such a war would last long enough to even see a need for our economy to radically change. And honestly I don't think this is american patriotism talking, by just looking at history I think this is really what would happen. And this is without the US using even 1 of its thousands of nukes.
Dude first off, wow you weren't educated to hate america at all . Here is the thing when I was talking about how the North Koreans wouldn't stand a chance I was just talking about conventional, Geneva Convention sanctioned tactics. The US could win way easier if they used scorched earth tactics. By that I mean fire bomb the entire country, carpet bomb every city and watch the boarders for anybody smuggling food and kill them. We could starve North Korea in a year if they didn't have any help. That is how powerful America is. That is what we were effectively able to do to Japan in WW2 and we are much technologically more advanced now. Again I don't mean to tut the patriotic america horn, I am just stating facts. If you chose to ignore these facts and think we don't know how to fight, you believe that, enjoy having your own opinions.
David Kraatz first of all i live in a NATO country my parrents are not anti american And i dident say North Korea would win And if america ever attacked north korea North korea would nuke the ahit out of south korea A good ally of USA. And if you know USA they dont have the balls to attack a country that has nukes
No country has the balls to attack a country that has nukes... That is the point of having nukes. We also haven't/won't nuke N. Korea because it will harm our allies. You really don't seem to think things through and you definitely like to assume the worst of other people though, enjoy whatever little country you are from and the protection America provides it.
@Lu B.oh i see well this could be understood by 2 ways a) you (person) cant speak for the whole country b) you (nation) are not a legitime goverment and should not exist word "fucking" make it seem more like option b) to me
+Jay Perales _"If North Korea does not step down, they will be met with fire and fury like never before seen."_ He doesn't seem to understand the dangers of unnecessary escalation.
+Theoret1cal Fair enough. My main concern is whether or not our current President will listen to his generals and not act brashly as he's known to do. Obama was at least more careful.
ROK but they should quickly mobilize and militarize the industry. The sheer number of DPRK might overwhelm northern region of ROK even though ROK have the clear technological superiority.
Rob Cosentino becz they cant trump administration or even anyone or anyamerican , not a single nk army can be touched by them if they could it d be iraq already lmao🤣🤣🤣
We won't go boots on the ground. We f'ing better not because i can tell you right now, any support for the current administration wouldn't survive for a second term. This needs to be swift, and absolutely devastating. One thing is for sure, it's on, and it has been since the 60's, it was just a matter of time folks. Strap the fuck in.
As a former U.S. Navy submarine vet, I can promise you that much of what would be needed, the U.S. Navy already has off the coast of North Korea. War sucks.
1 month and north korea would be a smoking husk of its future self. The US would utilize all its military assets at once in coordination with the south Korean and Japanese forces not separately as your video explained. You also didn't mention the north korea has a food and munition shortage.
Russia and China out of economic and political pressure would probably not support NK. No need to use up all of your resources on a dying nation. Thats why the USSR abandoned them.
Sorry but we Swedes are not stupid to put a huge military budget to challenge our finn brothers. And a russian invasion isnt that likely to Sweden compared to Finland. Finland have been invaded by Russia several times in history.
Jimmy Seliö, EGS8877 It would be a draw accually, Sweden would be more sustained cause of its better production efficiency. But for now Finland has more tanks and such. If the 2 countries had 1 year to prepare themselves then Sweden would win because it could put more on the military budget cause they're richer and has bigger population.
(Allies NATO United Nation Western Power & Axis CSTO BRICS Eastern Power Defector Battle Plan For Liberation of south korea from north korea and invasion of north korea battle of north korea/Battle of Pyongyang Operation Peace Dragon)1:04,1:30,1:38,1:45,1:51,1:56,2:01,2:07,2:12,2:17,2:20,2:24,2:30,2:35,2:41,2:43,2:47,2:53,2:58,3:04,3:13,3:19,3:23,3:28,3:33,3:45,3:54,4:01,4:07,4:15,4:31,4:49,5:00,5:03,5:10,5:14,5:24,5:34,5:42,5:44,5:59,6:08,6:20,6:24,6:34,6:43,6:50,6:59,(7:06),7:18,7:26,7:34,7:42,8:11,8:28,8:44,8:59,9:06,9:21,9:34,9:45,9:56,10:07,10:08,10:19
Pavinderdeep Nahal surya yadav there would be one obvious winner but it would obliterate the Indian economy effectively killing India's rise with massive casualties on both sides.
In reality, the NK regime would probably respond to a conventional attack with WMDs (either chemical or nuclear, or both), because they'd know the end to their rule is inventible at that point and would want to cause as much damage while they go down. This type of response would give the US enough reason to employ nuclear weapons against NK, and that coupled with a strong air/cruise missile campaign and special forces operations to take out key leadership, would mean you could practically march in without facing an organized military and have full control of the country with boots on the ground within a year or two (though you'd still face heavy fighting), as long as not too many nuclear weapons are used and the country doesn't become a radiated wasteland where soldiers can't be sent to. However, the US would be setting a dangerous precedent and taking the risk of starting WW3 if China and/or Russia decide to get involved. In any case, most of South Korea is destroyed both by conventional artillery and WMDs, resulting in millions of civilian casualties - and the same thing would happen in NK + probably military casualties for the US in the low 6 figures and millions for South and North Korea. In conclusion, as you said, it wouldnt be worth it. However, others may argue that the only thing we get to choose is WHEN war breaks out with DPRK, not IF. Anyways, great video!
NK: I have a nuke
US: I lost count of how many I have.
Wolfie Densetsu I think we Americans lost count after 50 lol
@@joshredfern1989 Don't forget, as well as losing count, you've managed to lose half a dozen Nuclear Weapons as well!
Well I’m not responsible for the nukes if I was I’d put them at specific areas an mark them on the map to never forget, but you know how half of us Americans type correctly without getting shitted on by our cranky British cousins or a European since Britain left the union, plus it’s usually the idiots in charge of the nukes an the smart ones getting ordered around so yeah,
the same with countries with oild but without the NK
NK have some nukes
Now I want to see North Korea vs USA, Kim Jong-un propaganda edition.
krogenx hahah
krogenx in that scenario, KJU would've call upon his unicorn to disintegrate the US air force, and then he would splash in the ocean, causing a tsunami that sinks the dirty American navy, and after seeing all of this, the American fools will overthrow their government and hand everything over to the dear leader
I would watch that for the lolz
there's a written one out there somewhere, pretty scary to those who don't know any better; hilarious to those who do.
This WAS the Kim Jong-Un propaganda edition... there is no way that large numbers of poorly trained and malnourished soldiers would stand a chance against US expeditionary forces. By the time any US force landed, there would be no more coastal defenses and any armor or artillery that was stupid enough to poke its head out to fire at US troops would be quickly dealt with. Millions of Korean soldiers would die compared to maybe 5k US soldiers. The only reason that we've had as many casualties in over the last 16 years in the Middle East is because of stupid decisions by politicians. Also, if one nuke was shot at the US anywhere, NK would vanish in a mushroom cloud puff of smoke.
That is the first time I have ever seen a hopeless rating on this channel, rest in peace MIG-17-19.
He's done a "hopeless" before, but I can't remember when
I think he had done a hopeless one in the China VS South Korea.
Or was it Indonesia VS Australia?
Lol, it made me laugh xD. It sounds like cavalry charging tanks all over again.
Carlos Antonio rip polish winged hussars
Desperation, desperation, they're outnumbered 15 to one, and the battle's begun!
*THEN* *THE* *WINGED* *HUSSARS* *ARRIVED!*
Don't forget that North Korea doesn't have enough food to feed it's army for 2 week's.
No. Rusha give
@@isrpress8604 The USA does not need to attack NK. It literally cant feed the majority of its population. They have prison camp farms where people starve to death picking food for others.
THE Only way this would ever work, is if NK strikes first, and as mentioned by Tron, and also stated, NK would be on its own. Which they know. Which would mean there most likely will never be a war between those two as long as this situation is happening (NK Starving and isolated, USA happy, over feed, center of the attention most of the time) *Russia is barely helping in peace time by the way. They also have the highest homelessness/starving people among the modern countries.
NK However has made it clear multiple occasions that it wants the USA off the map. Which now makes it a little more likely that this scenario that he showed, may play out.
I do disagree with the video. The USA may struggle but it will not have as hard of a time as he suggests. Main reason, the USA military utilizes all aspect of its arsenal in a more fluid way. You cant sit there and tell me that the airforce will be sitting by while their outdated tanks roll up on their buddies. Not to forget these arent the old timer dummy bombs either. typically 1 shot 1 kill.
NK Will give the USA issues yes. Not nearly as bad as one would think however. Thats a huge army he has but its not easy to mobilize in a wartime situation which they have never really been in vs the USA which has been at war for a good long time, and probably hasnt gone more than a couple of decades between wars the further you go back to the US Korean war.
In conclusion, this video is mostly correct. You on the other hand are 100% wrong. If anything they may assist the USA for the first time, as mentioned by Putin around the time he also warned that he will Not help in anyway (NK) if they strike the USA first.
NK would just become a parking lot for a Krogers.
@tron This until the US does not invade North Korean territory and overthrow the regime....i don't think Russia and China would be pleased to have US military bases on their border.
@tron Yes....but bases in South Korea do not border China and Russia
Try 1 week! 3 generations of malnutrition shortens their average height down to 4inches compare to the their counter part S K!
kim jong un disliked this video on all of north korea's 2000 computers
Cameron Andrewes i laughed
Cameron Andrewes hhhhhh good one
Most North Koreans have SMARTPHONES now. Even in rural areas.
Peter Smythe You can’t even take a joke when it’s against North Korea?
Wrong now they are 2,900 lol
MiG-17s? Lol. Might aswell buy some Spitfires from the UK to strengthen their air force.
5tr3ps1l5 I don’t think the UK would accept that trade.
Oh I'm sure they can get a good deal with a museum somewhere
5tr3ps1l5 indonesian jets at museums is pretty affordable
Jets are too expensive though... Even if they are Indonesian :/
5tr3ps1l5 the only jets that indonesia have invested into is the KFX which have the possiblity to fail as the US doesnt want to give the most important tech for the jet
This war would be like cavemen facing mounted Medieval knights.
Faxx lmao
Or cannons
@Game Hacker what about around7 0000 us casualties rather than those greater than the vietnam conflict. That is more realistic.
@cooked oven eggs they are already starving to death.
THEN THE WINGED HUSSARS ARRIVED!
The Iraqi army wad the 5th largest army in the world at the time and considering how fast the US erdicated it NK stands no chance.
Iraq is largely flat and easy to move across. NK has far more mountains and easily defensible positions. I do agree that NK stands no chance, I just don't think it would be the same kind of cake walk Iraq was.
@@brentr9161 they also launched from Saudi Arabia
but that was in 1990-1991 that's why the US couldn't invade Iraq at that time. after 14 years the army was nothing with old and out dated weapons
But they destroyed most of the army in the desert and it was 41 vs 1 and Iraq has no nukes
Coalition exists. US has no friendly ports in Korea in this scenario so... Huge casualties.
Do a modern global WW3 scenario!
it would take a while but it would be good.
He could do it in multiple parts
Well he did RussiavTurkey and RussiavUSA in multiple parts. Although I imagine WW3 would take more than that, he'd probably need half a video just to explain who would be on each side.
Chris Gaming , Up
That'll be extremely difficult, too many variables. Also, the battleground must be chosen because there's too many possible place to fight.
America vs North Korea = Chuck Norris vs 1,000 toddlers
are those toddlers teething? lol
Far more powerful combatant against a more numerous opponent with little to no offensive capability ? Yup, that sums it up quite well.
SwankeyMonkey Usa chicken.. busy for looking allies to fight the Kim.. fake superpower
Wot bout North Korean rebels
Cay A.F. laser gun electro boy fake superpower my ass
Bet you Kim Jong Un is getting butt hurt over hearing this
Stalin NUUUUUU! IS IS STRAAAAAAAAAWNG!
Raptorguy3 Stalin approves
Michael Ji Kim leaches of Chinese free wifi
Stalin USSR RULES
Way are you still alive
Eh.........if NK managed to get one nuke on a base or a city then the all of NK would be nuked in response.
Three little words Electro-Magnetic Pulse. A nuke atop a ballistic missile of any range detonating at the top of its trajectory will EMP the neighborhood.
@@earlwyss520 That's 26 words.
I doubt we would lanch nukes over getting hit with one nuke. In this case our conventional forces would be able to overwhelm their military fast enough to erase their nulear threats.
@@MikeBrown-go1pc But why would the US bother suffering more losses when it now has a perfect reason to nuke NK? Remember, the US is the only country in the world to actually use a nuke.
@ mrmoo Because there are other places around NK and no one likes radiation. Why cause a bunch of radiation over one nuclear hit when we could achieve the same level of destruction with conventional weapons pretty much uncontested? NK isn't the USSR, China or WWII Japan.. I'm confident that everything of military or government importance could be destroyed in NK with conventional weapons in a short time with a very low amount of losses. US would get global moral high ground by not nuking NK. In contrast, radiation spilling into China, SK and Russia might piss them off and if enough people get killed, China may decide to launch.
Taking a low yield hit by NK but using only a massive conventional counter attack would take care in being sure not to aid in the begings of a full scale global thermal nuclear war.
I love how in all of these videos, the countries aren't allowed to use nukes except North Korea because the conflict would be completely one-sided without them.
Lol. The N Koreans get a nuclear handicap
That is how ALL of Binkov’s battles are set: otherwise there are too many variables and scenarios
@@CorePathway yeah, but North Korea is so pathetic that they are allowed to have their nukes.
DPRK:military budget=40 percent of total GDP
CHINA:military budget=1.3 percent of total GDP
(p.s. china's military budget is almost 10 times of dprk's )
and whats more, US military budget is 4 times of china's
chou zihe US's is also just 2.4%
NORTH KOREA IS OUR BRO.
chou zihe because they have trillions of debts to China.....
Akshat Chaaras Stfu we will annihilate that country.
*After north korea uses a nuke*
Kim Jong-un: "Why did it get dark so fast?"
Kim Jong-un's Generals: "It appears the U.S as sent 1,900 nukes at us"
Kim Jong-un: "WORRY NOT! I the great leader will save us from th--
*North Korea is now no Korea*
1,900 nukes is most likely to obliterate all forms of life from siberia to the south china sea
You need not continue to sell me the idea, I was on board already after he mentioned the nukes.
why do you guys think the usa can just do that..... you guys act like the second and third largest countries aren't aren't allied and won't defend north korea...
Kilos You think Russia or China are going to go all out war to defend NK and that butt swab leader? Silly stuff that..be serious. They have nothing to gain...nothing
Kilos this comment made me hornyy because this is what i try to tell ppl but they dont listen. no homo
South Korea and the US never worry about North Korea. They just have to consider about China and Russia.
why would china and russia fight usa when their economies depend on eachother?
@@thunderbosz China desires North Korea to exist as a buffer zone. I dunno. Think about a prosperous nation on your border as a trading partner, China would benefit a lot. IMO.
@@thunderbosz I have the same question...why would usa fight china when their economies depend on each other? lmao
(Allies NATO United Nation Western Power & Axis CSTO BRICS Eastern Power Defector Battle Plan For Liberation of south korea from north korea and invasion of north korea battle of north korea/Battle of Pyongyang Operation Peace Dragon)1:04,1:30,1:38,1:45,1:51,1:56,2:01,2:07,2:12,2:17,2:20,2:24,2:30,2:35,2:41,2:43,2:47,2:53,2:58,3:04,3:13,3:19,3:23,3:28,3:33,3:45,3:54,4:01,4:07,4:15,4:31,4:49,5:00,5:03,5:10,5:14,5:24,5:34,5:42,5:44,5:59,6:08,6:20,6:24,6:34,6:43,6:50,6:59,(7:06),7:18,7:26,7:34,7:42,8:11,8:28,8:44,8:59,9:06,9:21,9:34,9:45,9:56,10:07,10:08,10:19
Russia isn't a threat. They aren't stupid, China is though.
kim jong un made 777 accounts to dislike this video
PRAISE KEK
And it cost them half of their annual GDP to try to connect to the youtube
awsten and 1000 more
The dislikes are from people who don't want any war...
awsten 1 thousand 5 hundred dislikes kim jun un
the almighty Lichtenstein Empire vs China
china wouldnt stand a chance
Chair Kun china is no atc for lichtenstein whole african union nato and csto will be a better enemy for lichtenstein
Chair Kun lol my dad lives in Lichtenstein
ametyst the purple destroyer of boring things yeah the war would be over before it started lol
US vs North Korea
North Korea: Guess I'll die
Not really, just a dictator and some goons.
Yep
And take South Korea and parts of Japan with them. Seoul is only about 30 miles from the DMZ. The North Koreans have enough artillery to reduce Seoul to rubble. The North Koreans know that they cannot win a war against the US but can threaten the US allies with destruction.
US hater: *_IS tHis pRoPaGANda_*
Everything is propaganda to you. If it doesn't show America as evil bullies, you think it's propaganda.
@@brianjordan2192 bruh it was a joke
@@gergoa
Was it?
@@brianjordan2192 yeah...
@@brianjordan2192 r/woosh.
Well obviously South Korea and Japan would be in this war.
Amazing Guy yeah than the war would only last a week or two......two days I mean
But this is US vs NK only, but yeah in this scenario those two would be on our side
I identify as a m4a1 With acog scope More like two minutes
+Amazing Guy Actually, there is a chance that Japan wouldn't be in this war, because Japan isn't allowed to join any wars, and are only allowed to use their army if they get attacked themselves.
MRNEIN id prefer japan to not get involved
In RUclips, you watch North Korea leader. In North Korea, leader watches YOU.
Overkill97 In RUclips this joke isn't funny.
In RUclips this joke no funny. In joke, youtube funny
Houston Snelbaker But in funny, RUclips joke and North Korea leader watch RUclips not you
The leader of North Korea won't watches you, he will command someone watches you.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaahahh
Saudi Arabian VS Iran
agree
bump
Matt kid bumpu
Iran would annihilate them one on one lol.
unfair war
saudi arabia will crush iran in no time
iran have no chance
www.globalfirepower.com/countries-comparison-detail.asp?form=form&country1=iran&country2=saudi-arabia&Submit=COMPARE Yeah not likely.
1:32 As a follow on to the Rodong and No-dong they're rumored to be working on a much larger missile, the Yuge Dong
THE GREAT LEADER...ONE BENT DONG...
DON'T FORGET THE U.S ALLY, BEN DOVER.
As an American, I would honesty prefer that the U.S. didn't go to war with anyone. But these videos are fascinating.
Dolan Pls Please war I like how the US tear the entire world apart
I think every sane person would prefer that this situation can be resolved diplomatically (I say this as an American myself). Unfortunately Kim keeps shit talking everyone in the region. He's asking for it.
Many people will die, this is too sad.
@digital1911
Thank you for your service sir. My grandfather fought in Vietnam as a marine, can't imagine what you guys go through.
I'm a Kiwi living in New Zealand. If the USA does go to war I here and now swear my allegiance as an allied country and supporter of the USA to do my part because if it were not for the United States intercepting the Japanese navy fleet in world war II we here in New Zealand would all be speaking Japanese.. That intercept lead to the greatest display of naval battle power ever displayed in human history and in massive causalities. Americans lost their lives so that the south pacific could be free and I'll be dammed if I'm going to let Rocket man scare me. We here in NewZealand owe a lot to the United States and I wish they taught this fact in our schools here. I would love to become an American Citizen and serve my country. I'm proud of New Zealand. But I have to take my hat off to the United States of America. I hope America never falls. I hope America is victorious. Imagine the world without America. It would be terrifying. So God Bless the American President. God Bless all Americans everywhere, God Bless America and God Bless those that disagree so that they might understand.
You know if America goes to war Australia follows...
United Kingdom also.
Harrison_jz & South Korea
And France
And spain
And japan
Vatican City vs Monaco pls
Philo XD Swiss Guard all the way bro
microstate battle royal
Philo No nauru vs Vatican.
then upvote
Include St. Marino etc. es well though. XD
This is going to be one of the few times I am going to strongly disagree with your video. The US military wouldn't break a sweat destroying and invading North Korea. A lot of people though before the first Gulf War in 1990 that the US would take a lot casualties but they didn't and Iraq had a much better trained and equipment military.
First of the US air power would literally destroy EVERTHING in North Korea and once the bombing campaign was over, what little is left of the North Korean military wouldn't be able to put up much of a fight against the US army and Marines. Once the US army and Marines invaded North Korea, we would cut through them like a hot knife through butter. The war wouldn't last very long. Actually the longest part of the war would be the bombing campaign!
iraq hasn't spent 70 years brainwashing its people to dig entrenched positions. Also the very mountainous terrain of north korea would make it hard for forces to sweep through like they did in the deserts of iraq.
@@shanewalker3273 Just because they have terrain on their side doesn't mean they'll know how to use it. I also don't think a country who frequently boasts about its (false) power display would go for a guerilla campaign
Fallout: North Korea
Aeth Suneravelos im sitting here preparing my bottle caps Lol.
I always wonder what would the fallout universe look like in china
Ave, true to Caesar.
*FALLOUT* :
THE FALLOUT CARD GAME
Aeth Suneravelos *LOSER:* U.S.A
I like this video, however I feel your making the assumption that North Korean ground forces have parity to US ground forces, but that's not the case. Several first hand accounts from defectors tell of the training environment in North Korea. It's laughable, most of the course is conditioning and propaganda and combat training is woefully sub-par for regular troops. Their equipment is 1970 Soviet issue and night operations are virtually non-existent. A ground invasion would be done jointly with South Korea in the air, land, and sea with perhaps Japan giving Naval or Air support. Also missile defenses has been reinforced for months and modern systems should give 80%+ suppression on those 60s -70s era missile designs. We also have a large surface and submarine presence already there. While I agree there would be a lot of casualties if a sizable portion of the population doesn't bolt/defect as soon as they see us coming. There are several reports and defector intelligence indicating much of the population is being red-pilled by either the growing oppressive actions by the government and/or from information, radios, movies, and news being smuggled in from outside their borders. Overall it was a very well thought out video despite some over simplistic assumptions.
In first days of war, 25 South Korean and 42 Japanese nuclear plants gonna turn into a nation-scale Fukushima disaster due to conventional missile strikes.
Americans are clearly bluffing, they wont handle another Vietnam war.
Alexander Abdulov you don't know much about Vietnam do you?
partially* don't sugarcoat it xD
You realize the only reason we didn't win the Vietnam war is because we didn't fight to win? We didn't invade the north, if we had done that we'd have won in very short order.
This is not a fair fight....
north korean government is the one picking it tho
The little kid has been begging for a fight, the way that he whines and moans.
CryoFx "Not a fair fight" Are you stupid?
Ethan Deitz And what is he supposed to do ? Sit still while these idiots keep openly threatening 2 important allies and even their home territory ? Even china disapproves, tf mate
Seramic _Skeptical What im saying is that north korea would be destroyed
Yeah, Sadam Hussein have had much more powerful and modern military, own oil and it took few weeks to obliterate it.
NK air defence and air force would last about 24 hours if hiding and about 30 minutes if trying to fight back. Their submarines are loud and would be located/destroyed within few days.
As for NK army, they have no modern tanks or armoured vehicles + total US air superiority they do not stand a chance even against relatively small landing force supported by navy.
N Korea's army is spread around the country and would take days to move it to landing location.
Initial landing force would face relatively small number of defenders with mostly no tanks or artillery. while any arriving NK reinforcements could be nicely carpet bombed to oblivion.
In open conflict NK military stand no chance.
You underestimate your enemy. Not that NK would stand a chance, but it's terrain and style of fighting would make it a tougher nut to crack than Iraq was.
The US wasn't the only country fighting saddamn Hussein, many european countries took part.
@@Red-qg3ms
And you think that only the US would be fighting North Korea? Because last time multiple nations from around the world were involved.
You think it would take days to get enough men in NK to defend a beach head? I think they have probably been practicing that for the last several decades. Problem of the bombing of massed NK troops remains very high though. I think if NK were attacked they would immediately send everything they had into SK to muddy the lines a bit. I don't think NK could win, but ir could cause a blood bath for sure...
@@MikeBrown-go1pc
You should talk to Korean war vets. Hurry before they're gone.
Youd find that North Koreans are no joke on the battlefield, their ingenuity, tenacity, and fanaticism make them a dangerous opponent.
A war there would best be avoided.
The ignorance in this comment section is cancer. Go back up.
Epic Shneak Thanks for reminding me.
Epic Shneak u
thanks
Indeed it is. Trust him guys, I was too stupid to listen to him...
Nice one.
The puppet is so cute
Binkov is certainly adorable.
The mouth doesnt sync with speech but its still nice
@@sirwannabeguy4886 I think its cuz he's Russian
Give it up for Binkov!!!!
@@LegendaryKazooMann1936 The about page of his channel says he's from Croatia.
Binkov, your videos are awesome! One of the best channels on youtube!
Usa vs aliens?
so versus mexico?
USA win lol
Get some help dude
Depends on the species of aliens
We have the avengers initiative to take care of aliens ..
Please made China VS Russia
Chigga SpawN Exactly shockingly there's not a video
I think he only does enemies.
Never Lucky m8 uhh... France vs UK?
D1n0 Fr0g France and the UK *are* enemies. They pretend they're friends but they're only one spilled cup of tea or broken baguette away from another 100 years war.
are u kidding me? chinese and russian are not stupid
This would be so one-sided. It would be like me fighting a 1 year old baby. NK would get demolished.
cogenman Never undereastimate your enemy, espacialy not if your fighting in his land. And DO NOT UNDERASTUMATE SOMEONE WITH NUKES!
You're absolutely right with your statements.
Hypnotic blue Fireball The Us would not risk nuking North Korea, Japan would br pissed. South Korea would be very pissed (Fallout,refugies i mean nobody would want someone to be nuked less then 100,km away.)
China would be terrafied, the same as SK but china realy would not want NK to be nuked. (Refugees,fallout,us troops on border etc...)
It's a 1-yr-old who's holding a loaded gun pointing at your friend's head.
Japan want's America to do litterally anything about NK. China has already said that if North Korea fires the first shot, no matter what goes on, they will not enter the war on either side.
Qatar vs. Saudi Arabia.
i agree
this would interest me very much. asking for a friend ;)
That would be a walkover by Saudi. Qatar is small, and its terrain is flat desert. The saudi military isnt only much bigger, but also much well equipped than Qatari military. War would be over in weeks if not days.
Qatar without Turkey would get destroyed.
Qatar WITH Turkey would get destroyed.
2:45 "North Korea Managed To *Mate* [With] A Nuclear Warhead..."
Eyyyy, I found you on that Family Guy episode about India!
KingPanda1337 is it road to india
Prankster Gaming It's "Family Guy - Brian Hits The Red Buttons"
HA! GAYYYYYYYY
What happened with Turkey Vs Greece
SHEPHλRD 1337 Turkey vs Greece is Turkey vs EU and NATO
GD_King_Olav not really its a greek patriot war for retaking lands
No allies
GD_King_Olav Turkey is part of NATO
i dont know turkey vs iran or turkey vs saudis would be more even. we saw that turkey can withstand russia. its like united states vs north korea oh well
Next Video:
Guam vs. North Korea
Spoiler: Korea doesn't win.
FIRE AND FURY
Guam na be easy
No Dong....Didn't know Binkov knew Kim in THAT kinda way....
Also the US military is so heavily funded, and equipped with the best equipment,and NK can't even feed it's people so how is it going to beat 20000 Marines? Marines are some of the top-notch in the US military
That's what people think in case of Vietnam too
@@tattiman9855 Vietnam had tons of Guerilla fighters and someone actually backing them the entire time.
North Korea would be on it's own, and it's regime is slowly losing power as the outside world seeps in.
@@tattiman9855Vietnam had allso big loses if americans would push again Vietnam vould colapse
problém was the political situation in USA
Not to mention those old weaponry aren’t properly maintained
Did anyone else giggle when it said North Korean had 100 No Dongs?
I'm such a child LUL
Pricie Gaming .....no.... what's so funny?
Kilos
Dong is slang for penis
North Korean "no dong" missiles are smaller and less capable than US missiles? Hmm....
Yea but. suppose they build one with a dong? ( I couldn't resist)
Tats y NKorea learn their mistake and renamed it from 'No-Dong' to 'Wah-Dong'... u will say 'Wah!' when u see its DONG.
European Union vs Russia
With current Russian army, EU should win. Ask again in 2020, when Russia upgrades.
Wings of Darkness Not much need for that. The EU is already screwed, politically, and financially.
Jonathan Chambers wait WHAT ?????
like I said the russian economy is on the edge of collapse and even with the euro most of the EU is financially viable so I don't get whether your head is up your own ass or your just stupid.
Wait North Korea still has a mig-17😂😂 I play that plane in at thunder and it gets versed with sabres
Robert Li I think you mean war thunder
no it fucking sucks.
Just break the wings for instant speed boost
Bootleg Kawaiicaust ϟϟ Not vs an F15, F16, F18, or F22.
Michael A :I
A few things to keep in mind: After a year of non-stop air and cruise missile attacks, there would be nothing left in N. Korea worth bombing. The US would not only destroy large weapons systems, but any troop gatherings, all command and control, all logistics, all munitions supplies. Basically N. Korea would not be able to move a battalion somewhere without it being attacked/destroyed. Also, I suspect most N. Koreans would quickly abandon the fight as they probably don't support the government and even if they did, how would they be fed and supplied? I see a US cakewalk.
The north korean people probably wouldnt even revolt. Theu wouldnt know how or what to do or would either be to twrrified of their government to or would listen to their government. North Korean people other than the 1% live in a shell. Its a real life dystopia.
Switzerland vs Austria next!
That tiny mountainous border would be hell to pass.
StardustNotHötzendorf
+Lichtenstein
Ghj Ghj Noone would push into Vaterland!
Liechtenstein wins.
Case closed.
Liechtenstein Mapper LIECHTENSTEIN STRONK
So basically we will never see SK vs NK...
As fun as these simulations may be, they don't in any way give us an idea of what a real war would look like. How well might US do if they CAN use Japan and SK? How well would SK do by itself.
South Korea + US + Japan vs. North Korea + tentative support from China, as they try to avoid war with US, especially if the war was escalated to nuclear war by North Korea. IMO this seems the most realistic.
You should take a random world map, split all the countries into teams according to the colors they have, and find out which team would win a world war.
I meant the colour they have on the map. And not from the maps where the 'real' colour is shown, but the ones where countries get different colours to seperate them. In most of those, amerika, russia and china would all be on different sides, which would already make a kind of 'fair' war.
Yes, take a political map of the world and do this! It would be awesome.
Or you could take the main color from their flag. (I.e Red for Canada, blue for Britain, etc...).
And utterly wrong.....
Would like to see some of these Binkov battles redone using a limited amount of likely allies. That would be a bit more real world.
This video gives N. Korea too much credit.
N. Korea does not have a chance to put up a fight. They can't hold their own in any of the areas where we can create damage. However, they do have a very large number of ground troops, but all the numbers in the world won't hold up against advanced aircraft and guided missiles. One year of fighting the strongest and most advanced military in the world's history, is unrealistic. Would give North Korea 3 to 4 months until they give up. Once their Armed Forces realizes that there is no supplies left, that's when the war will end.It is hopeless for them to think that they have a chance to win.
South Korea, mandoraty to serve 2 years in the military. South and US will both attack North. Bombing all their artillery and vehicles, It'd take weeks for North to surrender. I mean, US and South can use jets instead of troops to bomb the shit out of North.
??? Vietnam??? the terrain is different, no USSR to the rescue, no influx of money from other communist countries...China you might say...it won't be to their best economic interest for them to intervene against us. Don't get me wrong China has become big, however, it is not in their best interest to get into a war with their number one trading partner. In fact, most of its top trading partners are good friends of ours and N. Korea is does not make the top 10. Me the fool? I think not sir.
Lol north korea has been preparing for war for the past 40 years they can easly adapt to gorilla war just like in vietnam
Juan Quiroz and then get there asses kicked and handed to them veitnam happened 50 years ago America is a lot stronger now easy adaption sure that doesn't mean they have a chance they would just be delaying the inevitable
i guess he did not know that north korea is LIVING IN THE 1950s WITH 40s TECHNOLOGY
Somehow that 1940's technology yieled about 5 nuclear bombs. Hmmmm
Australia vs New Zealand please!!!
Bugwandi The First yeahhh mate we need one of those!!!
The Emu would invade all
Australia vs Canada might be a bit more of a even fight. or heck maybe a battle royal with all of our fellow colonial brothers
Bugwandi The First australias army got defeated by emus...
not interesting at all
Landing US troops in NK will inevitably mean a massive Chinese intervention just like it happened in 1950.
North Korea vs South Korea
Shoji Tanaka So milita?
These videos are always so well done. Despite this, I would love to see something like Japan vs China, Iran vs Saudi Arabia, North Korea vs South Korea, UK vs Russia or Brazil vs Argentina
North Korea: NORTH KOREA STRONK
USA: yeah that’s cute.
If the US revives Project Thor, they could Kinetic Bombard the living shit out of North Korea from orbit, with tungsten rods moving at Mach 10 delivering the force of a small nuke without radiation. UMAD NKFAGS?!?!?!?!?!?
Also, with our ally’s with South Korea, Japan, NATO, and even Russia, we could easily crush NK if they attacked us first. Project Thor just makes it easier to take out targets
Spain and France vs Italy and Germany
Read the comment, mate. He's saying that Italy and Germany team up to fight Spain and France.
Harambe Italy switches sides and France surrenders
master munguku is the same
Harambe its not realistic at this time, but if it happens, its an unfair fight, Germany is export world master, they have enough money to make an strong military, and Italy have the Vatican.. they have enough money too
Son Goku but remember the time is limited and France and Spain arguably have a stronger navy and army. Of course the German industry would eventually overrun the opposers but in the first few months anything could happen. You can also change Spain with U.K. For a "fairer" fight
Somalia vs Kenya ? no? ok ill go now......................
bad hair day lol looked at profile pic love bhd
"Somalia has a plentiful source of hippos for its naval attacks, however Kenyas lions may be able to launch several successful land attacks. While Kenya uses the outdated crocodile in its navy, its stealth may become useful against Somalias hippos. But Kenya must be weary of Somalias Cheetahs, they're not as vicious but are known for their agility" - Disclaimer, I have no idea if these animals are even in these countries
How about Greenland vs Iceland? The battle of the lands.. Well maybe not...
Kavan DuBoise OMG LMFAO 😂 I instantly started laughing so hard that the tears in my eyes made it difficult for me to finish reading your comment! Funniest comment I've seen in a long time! 👍
4:50 Haha, I love it how he marked it "Hopeless"
I enjoy your content. Your voice and accent are pleasant and add a nice flavor to some original material. The puppet is a nice touch! Thank you.
Israel vs. all it's neighbors (again;)
It wouldn't end well, considering the US is pumping money into both sides.
If nukes are allowed, Israel wins. If not... I'm not sure.
Chris Gaming *If illegal nukes are allowed, then...
Jordan is way stronger than Syria
Jeff Sanders lol Israel would conquer the Middle East in that scenario.
Hmm, I feel like he undervalues air superiority a bit. In Vietnam we(america) were not "at war" meaning we didn't have the ability to invade north vietnam or hold ground so all we did was kill people, and we were really good at it. Even though we "lost" that war statistics show we killed 12 for every 1 american killed. That came with superior weapons/equipment, 100% superior aircraft and efficient tactics to accomplish the goal of killing charlie. I think that in this scenario the US has all the same advantages plus actually being able to "conquer" territory. This means that we can make real progress in that war like put down gorillas, in case of enemy numerical superiority we can bomb the ever loving bejesus out of them without any interference which would give ample opportunity for marines to establish a beach head. I don't think such a war would last long enough to even see a need for our economy to radically change. And honestly I don't think this is american patriotism talking, by just looking at history I think this is really what would happen. And this is without the US using even 1 of its thousands of nukes.
Dude first off, wow you weren't educated to hate america at all . Here is the thing when I was talking about how the North Koreans wouldn't stand a chance I was just talking about conventional, Geneva Convention sanctioned tactics. The US could win way easier if they used scorched earth tactics. By that I mean fire bomb the entire country, carpet bomb every city and watch the boarders for anybody smuggling food and kill them. We could starve North Korea in a year if they didn't have any help. That is how powerful America is. That is what we were effectively able to do to Japan in WW2 and we are much technologically more advanced now. Again I don't mean to tut the patriotic america horn, I am just stating facts. If you chose to ignore these facts and think we don't know how to fight, you believe that, enjoy having your own opinions.
David Kraatz first of all i live in a NATO country my parrents are not anti american And i dident say North Korea would win
And if america ever attacked north korea North korea would nuke the ahit out of south korea A good ally of USA. And if you know USA they dont have the balls to attack a country that has nukes
No country has the balls to attack a country that has nukes... That is the point of having nukes. We also haven't/won't nuke N. Korea because it will harm our allies. You really don't seem to think things through and you definitely like to assume the worst of other people though, enjoy whatever little country you are from and the protection America provides it.
"bitch please america joined ww2 when germany was almost dead"
I know where you can learn proper history mate.
yeah i dont know why he puts a time limit on the battles
You forgot to take into account the inspiring effect of the Eternal Supreme Leader
Duke of Lorraine aren't you support to be taking back Jerusalem?
But hey why let a you tube video get in the way of a perfectly good crusade.
Duke of Lorraine That inspiring effect will probably create a coup/revelation the moment the North Koreans see a burger.
Go Go USA! SouthKorea support USA!
@Lu B. *replys to a year old comment*
@Lu B. Nigga who cares
@Lu B. butthurted commie be like
@Lu B. so why do you hate south corea? a democratic and advanced nation
@Lu B.oh i see
well this could be understood by 2 ways
a) you (person) cant speak for the whole country
b) you (nation) are not a legitime goverment and should not exist
word "fucking" make it seem more like option b) to me
🤔WELL WELL WELL...
GO FEED YOUR PEOPLE KIM
*_player xXx_Kim_Jong_Un_xXx has changed teams_*
comment deleted by Kim Jong Un
KIM JUNG UN God bless NK ... FUCK USA
KIM JUNG UN Imposter
I feel like a bunch of new people who see this will be here because of what Trump Said a few days ago.
Yep, this video has taken on new relevance.
+Jay Perales _"If North Korea does not step down, they will be met with fire and fury like never before seen."_ He doesn't seem to understand the dangers of unnecessary escalation.
+Theoret1cal When?
+Theoret1cal Not the same, as he denounces using nukes as a danger to both South Korea and innocent civilians in North Korea.
+Theoret1cal Fair enough. My main concern is whether or not our current President will listen to his generals and not act brashly as he's known to do. Obama was at least more careful.
DPRK VS ROK
DPRK 100% win with out usa
ROK but they should quickly mobilize and militarize the industry. The sheer number of DPRK might overwhelm northern region of ROK even though ROK have the clear technological superiority.
you know what?still south korea lose,search and you know
Shoji Tanaka True they got many top 5 ranked vechiles.
but DPRK have more soldier etc
We could destroy them through a war of attrition alone.
They've been fighting an economic war of attrition for decades now lol
Do China vs USA 2077 edition in the fallout universe
Liberty prime wins(before nukes kill everyone)!
Yeah China was actually losing the war
R5E where can I find more about the lore other than the games the only ones I haven't played is one and two because I done have a pc
Commissar Binkhov soft toys available?
I would buy one😁👍
Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton
With or without allies/morale/nukes included?
yes with
Chris Gaming without allies, Clinton would lose horribly without her critical ally of Sanders
we already saw who won that one dumbass.
but that happend, Trump won. ( unless Obama come back for a third term and deliver the end of days in bible )
North Korea: launches missile at us
Missile gets destroyed by missile defence system
North Korea: O_O
not funny
France vs Italy
totally although France would win
when pigs fly You don t even know where Italy is dumbass
Nick Sharon what makes you say that?
France. I believe they have the better military, better navy, better airforce and better experienced troops. Not to mention they have nukes.
Italy will win convincingly with its roman empire spirit
Why is this even a suggestion we know the obvious winner but it is cool to see the pros and con situations tho
I think it will take less time to take out North Korea then for you to explain this possible scenario.
Rob Cosentino
So... why take to long to attack NK??
So why americunt hold on??
If its as easy as yo say... this should be done!
Why do it?
Sogols Sikey because china
Rob Cosentino becz they cant trump administration or even anyone or anyamerican , not a single nk army can be touched by them if they could it d be iraq already lmao🤣🤣🤣
Yeah I doubt it would take a year to destroy them. Maybe a few months. I believe the USA and South Korea would handle them well.
DEAR BINKOV can we get a full on DPRK vs US led coalition
India and Pakistan
rock singh Pak wins
India would rape Pakistan. Not a fair fight. It should be China vs India.
Music Music Not fair India would lose.
We already had 4 real simulations. India won.
Mohammed Hassan ,,,,,Wow, & the ref takes a point! "Keep the gloves UP!" He says. P
China vs Russia please please please please
Vartic Alexandru that will never happened they're close friends
1 Views He did Norway vs Sweden and Belgium vs Netherlands, so why not?
There was a war between the Soviet Union and China in 1969. It was the funniest war I ever read about:P You should look it up you'll enjoy it.
182,747,282 Views so what? That doesnt mean he shouldnt do it
Whoever defends should win.
We won't go boots on the ground. We f'ing better not because i can tell you right now, any support for the current administration wouldn't survive for a second term. This needs to be swift, and absolutely devastating. One thing is for sure, it's on, and it has been since the 60's, it was just a matter of time folks. Strap the fuck in.
As a former U.S. Navy submarine vet, I can promise you that much of what would be needed, the U.S. Navy already has off the coast of North Korea. War sucks.
1 month and north korea would be a smoking husk of its future self. The US would utilize all its military assets at once in coordination with the south Korean and Japanese forces not separately as your video explained. You also didn't mention the north korea has a food and munition shortage.
and China and Russia wood join north korea side if they did that
Avais Butt once again Mr idiot the problem would still apply a war with North Korea will have a war with Russia and China
Russia and China out of economic and political pressure would probably not support NK. No need to use up all of your resources on a dying nation. Thats why the USSR abandoned them.
Malaysia vs Singapore!
MuhdZikry tf
Awesome videos! love it
Do Canada VS French Canada!
lol
Greenland vs Iceland
Hypnotic Goat
thats like Luxembourg vs Liechtenstein
Hypnotic Goat so a region vs a country?
Canadas barely has a military
I promise you, a war wouldn’t last more than a month
Finland vs Sweden
Jimmy Seliö Finland wins easy
dr mandora I know 👌
Sorry but we Swedes are not stupid to put a huge military budget to challenge our finn brothers. And a russian invasion isnt that likely to Sweden compared to Finland. Finland have been invaded by Russia several times in history.
We would be beaten by you for sure! You got the strenth in number of soldiers alone. Glad we are brothers :)
Jimmy Seliö, EGS8877 It would be a draw accually, Sweden would be more sustained cause of its better production efficiency. But for now Finland has more tanks and such. If the 2 countries had 1 year to prepare themselves then Sweden would win because it could put more on the military budget cause they're richer and has bigger population.
I dont know if Korea could Deal with few warthogs..
I "Seriously Doubt It" ! . . . especially FULLY LOADED !.
Warthog: i give a big trouble
Drones: make it double bro
He forgot that the U.S. air force can do mid-air refueling, this would mean almost all of the U.S Air Force would be able to fight...
few nation have the means to refuel their plane in flight
Korea = one = Unified Korea = Korean peninsula = Republic of Korea 🇰🇷
North Korea: We are the strongest military in the world!
US: Tell me how you are able to feed your military
North Korea: Not fair! America is cheating
(Allies NATO United Nation Western Power & Axis CSTO BRICS Eastern Power Defector Battle Plan For Liberation of south korea from north korea and invasion of north korea battle of north korea/Battle of Pyongyang Operation Peace Dragon)1:04,1:30,1:38,1:45,1:51,1:56,2:01,2:07,2:12,2:17,2:20,2:24,2:30,2:35,2:41,2:43,2:47,2:53,2:58,3:04,3:13,3:19,3:23,3:28,3:33,3:45,3:54,4:01,4:07,4:15,4:31,4:49,5:00,5:03,5:10,5:14,5:24,5:34,5:42,5:44,5:59,6:08,6:20,6:24,6:34,6:43,6:50,6:59,(7:06),7:18,7:26,7:34,7:42,8:11,8:28,8:44,8:59,9:06,9:21,9:34,9:45,9:56,10:07,10:08,10:19
India vs Pakistan
Kyle Netherwood nuclear war end of both countries if regular war India has a bigger population and would eventually overrun Pakistan
Comfortably Numb Football With normal Binkov rules of no nukes.
Kyle Netherwood look at second part of comment if regular war India has bigger population and overruns Pakistan
Comfortably Numb Football Yes, but it would make a good video. It would be similar to Russia vs Turkey which I enjoyed.
Kyle Netherwood that it would although in real life Pakistan loves China so it's likely that China would help
*Get rekt North Korea*
NITAAH VAN WINKLE USA USA USA
Now that the world has seen the difference in Russian and Western hardware. I would be curious if you still feel it would be a multi-year campaign.
India vs pakistan
Pavinderdeep Nahal surya yadav there would be one obvious winner but it would obliterate the Indian economy effectively killing India's rise with massive casualties on both sides.
They have not attacked each other recently due to nukes.
Russia vs Ukraine and Baltics!
little green men wins
Russia
Pavel Krit 0
is this a joke? Russia would invade them lol
Hircine, isn't US vs DPRK a joke?
In reality, the NK regime would probably respond to a conventional attack with WMDs (either chemical or nuclear, or both), because they'd know the end to their rule is inventible at that point and would want to cause as much damage while they go down. This type of response would give the US enough reason to employ nuclear weapons against NK, and that coupled with a strong air/cruise missile campaign and special forces operations to take out key leadership, would mean you could practically march in without facing an organized military and have full control of the country with boots on the ground within a year or two (though you'd still face heavy fighting), as long as not too many nuclear weapons are used and the country doesn't become a radiated wasteland where soldiers can't be sent to. However, the US would be setting a dangerous precedent and taking the risk of starting WW3 if China and/or Russia decide to get involved. In any case, most of South Korea is destroyed both by conventional artillery and WMDs, resulting in millions of civilian casualties - and the same thing would happen in NK + probably military casualties for the US in the low 6 figures and millions for South and North Korea. In conclusion, as you said, it wouldnt be worth it. However, others may argue that the only thing we get to choose is WHEN war breaks out with DPRK, not IF. Anyways, great video!
i'm worried that north korean agents are in all major cities with nerve/chemical weapons ready to release them if USA attacks
That seems unlikely. At least, not in all mejor cities, but some? Probably. However, I'm sure the US has something just as nasty.
Yet if Pyongyang strikes first Beijing and Moscow said Washington can do whatever.
you are underestimate s.korea military power too much, S.korea is top importer of U.S military weapon
M16s suck
Unlesss u have wD 40