Because that depend on atmospheric conditions and a target's radar cross section. Radar range is never a single, fixed number, but instead very variable. But for SMART-L extended range version the detection range of a 1m² target is 2.000 km.
it depends. they have helicopter that have extended radar to detect incoming threat over the horizon. the sm400 used mini phase array antenna. the rate it scan the air space is fast. the real problem if the hypersonic missile near the computer have very little chance to predict its course. also, the human reflex would have a hard time if the missile should be eliminated. you cant asked the commander fast enough if they have the green light to press the button to shoot it down. it could be anything flying toward them or away from them. should they used millions dollar anti missile to shoot it down or used a cheaper missile. the best course of action is survey your area with helicopter and such. so you dont have to rely on detecting short coming missile threat.
i guess im randomly asking but does anyone know of a tool to log back into an Instagram account?? I was stupid forgot my login password. I appreciate any help you can give me
@Brixton Derek Thanks so much for your reply. I found the site through google and I'm waiting for the hacking stuff now. Takes quite some time so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
After remembering the British were the pioneers of RADAR technology it makes perfect sense that THALES would be the world leader in that field despite much faster implementation by the US which clouded my judgement at first.
Thales isn't a British company though. It's radar division is predominantly if not exclusively Dutch. And the main company itself is French. The British accent of the guy lending his voice to this video might have given you the impression it was British, but that's mostly becaue the Dutch can sometimes have a bit of a thick accent ;-)
Britain, United States, and Germany all made quantum leaps in radar technology in the 1930/1940 period. Germany had a phased array search radar, Mamut, that was used operationally in WWII. In addition, German Small Wurzburg radar systems targeted allied aircraft and directed anti-aircraft batteries as well as aircraft mounted search and targeting radars on a number of fighters. The English Chain Home system was effective, but was fairly rudimentary for it's time.
@@d.j.9995 Is that right, D.J.? But you don't know anything about me. If you did, you might not find the thought of knocking me down so appealing. I certainly cannot blame you for concluding that all of us here have a strong tendency to weakness, given the events of the past year. But, the Biden administration does not speak for people like me. However, I do admire your command of the subject of military aviation. Instead of burdening yourself with thoughts of knocking me down, why can't we be friends instead, or at least friendly enemies.
@@peterplotts1238 War use to be my profession, French Foreign Legion and bad ass war experience before that. Military technology is my passion and I’m well informed who is doing what all over the world. Iran is not to be underestimated, we are talking about old Persia. They are a civilisation for it self in the Middle East.
@@d.j.9995 In that case, you would probably knock me down easily, but I would do my best. That is a very interesting background you have. You know, I even thought about joining the Legion at one point because I wasn't liking law school at all then. I wanted to be a soldier, but not just any soldier. So, I have great admiration for the Foreign Legion. To make a long story short, I finished law school, then I met a beautiful woman and we married. I stayed in America and had kids. I absolutely do not take Iran lightly. Iranians can be great people and their culture is ancient and more than worthwhile, but their present government seems very eager to kill Americans - and Israelis too. They want to be our enemies and I believe in giving people like that what they want. They don't speak for all Iranians either. Many Iranians have ties to America and they do not share their government's view of this country. I like military technology too, but I don't pretend to begin to know what someone like you does. It seems to me France produces some first-rate military technology. It always has. Did you take French citizenship and remain in France? Thanks for responding.
@@pieterveenders9793 Strangely enough i'm a US Navy veteran but i'm far more knowledgeble in aircraft combat systems so I have to take your word for it.
@@sean70729 It is mostly aviation sensors (predominantly radar) where Raytheon and Northrop Grumman excel at and are leaders in. Thales' subdivision Thales Netherlands (which was formerly Signaal) is pretty much exclusively focused on naval sensors, mostly radar, and dominate that field. Signaal produced the first digital radar in the world, the first AESA radar, and also the Goalkeeper CIWS, the superior cousin of the Phalanx. Goalkeeper isn't just superior because it uses a 30mm multi-barreled cannon versus the 20mm one of Phalanx, but it's the sensors and signal processing which make Goalkeeper so much better. While the Phalanx can simultaneously track up to 6 different targets, Goalkeeper can track up to 18, and Goalkeeper has had that capability from the very start when it came out in the early 80's while Phalanx originally was only able to track one target at a time and didn't introduce its multiple tracking capability untill it's much more recent upgrades in if I remember correctly 1998. Additionally, Goalkeeper has a much more accurate dual-band dual radar which provides it with unparalleled accuracy. The accuracy is so good that it generally hits an incoming supersonic sea-skimming missile within the first 5-6 rounds. In fact the Dutch Royal Navy has so much faith in its capabilities that somewhere during the 90's two supersonic sea-skimming missiles with dummy warheads were fired on a fully crewed Dutch Royal Navy ship to prove its capabilities. The engagement was filmed with ultra slow-motion camera's, and on that footage you can clearly see that the 1st round fired at the first missile only barely misses, landing in the sea, but the 2nd round already scores a direct hit destroying the missile (ruclips.net/video/6CHDjOCyixU/видео.html). The SMART-L long range search radar and it's variant the S1850M are especially good and have been equipped on many NATO warships (among others of Denmark, Norway, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, UK, Italy & France), though the best is exclusively in Dutch hands at the moment. While most search radars have a range of about 400 km, and SMART-L originally had that as well, Thales Netherlands' improvement extended that to 2000 km. No navy on earth has that capability, in fact our radar has 4-5x the detection range of every other navy in existence. On top of that it's a LPI (low probability of intercept) radar and highly resistent to ECM and capable of detecting stealth threats as well. Our warships have a Dutch equivalent to AEGIS, which is even interoperable with AEGIS ships, such as those of the US Navy, with the difference that ours can detect ballistic missiles at 4-5x the distance as US Navy ships and either calculate a fire solution and intercept it ourselves, or we can relay it over the air to another NATO ship if it has a better fireing solution and let it take the shot. In fact we practised it many times by now (ruclips.net/video/6CHDjOCyixU/видео.html). The US Navy does have a somewhat comparable capability, they also have an ESA radar for BMD with a 2000 km range like our updated SMART-L.... except it's literally a gigantic floating oil rig with a massive radome on top of it. My uncle was a NCO in the Dutch Royal Navy who retired a few years ago and he mentioned a joint test carried out by our Royal Navy and that of the US. A ballistic missile was fired at 1000+ km or so and the challenge was who could detect it first, your navy or ours. Not only did we detect it first, but our SMART-L didn't even skip a beat while doing so, it simultaneously tracked said ballistic missile and remained providing 360 degree coverage and tracking everything else in that 4000 km diameter dome over the ship. That US radar on the other hand would apparently only rotate 360 degree as it was scanning, but as soon as it did finally detect that ballistic missile it would stop rotating and aim the radar in its direction in order to track the target, only following said target while it was moving through space, thus making the radar completely useless when it came to all its order surveillance duties. When my uncle told me that I initially thought "no, it can't be, this sounds too wild, the US using a massive oil rig with a gigantic radome on it which they had to tow out to sea at a snail's pace in fear of it tipping over in rough seas, and it not even being able to do multiple simultaneous surveillance tasks, while our radar is compact enough it easily fits on top of one of our frigates and can do so much more and better than what the US has". But no it indeed was legit, you can find it in naval news sites with a bit of searching. That massive oil-rig mounted radar is this btw (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea-based_X-band_Radar). Thales Netherlands makes a bunch of different state of the art naval radars and has made them for a century now, so there are many other groundbreaking radars and other products I didn't even mention in the list. But if you're interested in seeing some more of Thales Netherlands I suggest you watch the video where Naval News visited their facility in Hengelo, the Netherlands (ruclips.net/video/210z3RaJpxY/видео.html).
@@claudiov5554 no the f16 are threats and are sending missiles to the oil platform.look at 1:40 in the top right rectangle it says threat 02 f16. And watch the trajectory of their missiles.
Of course an F16 will always be a threat to a non F16 nation....what is being depicted here is that no threat is incomprehensible ... Basically zero hype around the B2 & F16 in a battle space....you will go down
I pray to the Divine Master, that mankind will one day start spending as much time, resources , and technology on finding ways to help fellow mankind, instead of finding more sophisticated ways to hurt, mame, kill one another.
Obviously you need and a big ship like a destroyer, if it is demanded to carry on board the Smart-L. If you are skepticism of buying a less heavy ship, and more inexpensive like frigate, the SM400 seems a perfect solution and for the upgrades needed in the older ships, the NS100 is a modern answer.
Saab+Leonardo+Thales adl produsen radar canggih dunia. Rakyat Indonesia berharap wil kedaulatan NKRI dpt d lindungi oleh alusista gabungan dr 3 produsen trsbut khususnya radar aktif+pasif @3 radar slma 2020 - 2024. Gbu-amin.
Zračne snage Sjedinjenih Država su povukle F-117 iz upotrebe prije četrnaest godina. Za dvadeset sedam godina službe uključujući tri rata, samo je jedan izgubljen u neprijateljskoj vatri - onaj koji su srušili Srbi. Dakle, zaslužni su što su uradili ono što nijedan drugi protivnik nije mogao, ali servisni rekord ovog aviona je bez presedana u njegovom uspjehu. Zašto mislite da bi NEVA mogla srušiti B-2?
This AESA technology was stolen from Russia from MIG 25 fox back in Japan 45 year a go that the U.S. know anything about this radar ability to detach motorable target.
This can be jammed GPS. The other countries have jammers. EWF.. the size of a pack of cigarettes that would cripple and blind this the USA can retaliate with fire crackers :(((( lots to be learn
Could you please turn up the music? I can still hear the voice of the narrator.
Technolgy is a beautiful thing when it comes to systems such as featured here.
AESA technology is used onboard the F22 Raptor, obviously a compact version.
AESA radars are used on most advanced 4th gens and 5th gens
And rafale 😊
And J-17
@@_ashrafm lol
@@_ashrafm Chinese stuff doesn't stay long lolz
I worked on this technology during my tour in the Air Force. The technology has tripled a thousand times sense I worked in this industry.
Airbus and Thales ads have crazy dubstep tracks.
LMAO at 02:28 B2 Spirit passing by
why no mention of RANGE in kilometers???
Range is always a classified information
@@jojototo4566 radar only goes so far.
Because that depend on atmospheric conditions and a target's radar cross section. Radar range is never a single, fixed number, but instead very variable. But for SMART-L extended range version the detection range of a 1m² target is 2.000 km.
In terms of hypersonic projectiles, the radar refresh rate needs to be higher, or the method needs to change.
it depends. they have helicopter that have extended radar to detect incoming threat over the horizon. the sm400 used mini phase array antenna. the rate it scan the air space is fast. the real problem if the hypersonic missile near the computer have very little chance to predict its course. also, the human reflex would have a hard time if the missile should be eliminated. you cant asked the commander fast enough if they have the green light to press the button to shoot it down. it could be anything flying toward them or away from them. should they used millions dollar anti missile to shoot it down or used a cheaper missile. the best course of action is survey your area with helicopter and such. so you dont have to rely on detecting short coming missile threat.
Nice, I think radars are cool in how they work and this cleared up many misconceptions.
i guess im randomly asking but does anyone know of a tool to log back into an Instagram account??
I was stupid forgot my login password. I appreciate any help you can give me
@Ryan Winston instablaster =)
@Brixton Derek Thanks so much for your reply. I found the site through google and I'm waiting for the hacking stuff now.
Takes quite some time so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
@Brixton Derek It did the trick and I now got access to my account again. Im so happy:D
Thank you so much you saved my ass !
@Ryan Winston Happy to help xD
Really super animation... Which software used for animation sir... Can u tell for me... Thank u
I don't know what software they used but "Blender" is a really popular program for 3d animation.
After remembering the British were the pioneers of RADAR technology it makes perfect sense that THALES would be the world leader in that field despite much faster implementation by the US which clouded my judgement at first.
Thales isn't a British company though. It's radar division is predominantly if not exclusively Dutch. And the main company itself is French. The British accent of the guy lending his voice to this video might have given you the impression it was British, but that's mostly becaue the Dutch can sometimes have a bit of a thick accent ;-)
@@pieterveenders9793 No it was my American bias of associating all European technology with Britain because of their past glory.
Britain, United States, and Germany all made quantum leaps in radar technology in the 1930/1940 period. Germany had a phased array search radar, Mamut, that was used operationally in WWII. In addition, German Small Wurzburg radar systems targeted allied aircraft and directed anti-aircraft batteries as well as aircraft mounted search and targeting radars on a number of fighters. The English Chain Home system was effective, but was fairly rudimentary for it's time.
How fast can it spin?
Is this a TWS radar?
The mast of the warship is interfering with the propagation of the SMART-L radar. Doesn't it have anything to do with detection?
Make video in 1080p
B-2 spirit, no problem, one missile, no problem.
Darn! Only one B-2?
Who are here after Khan sir video😁
Which video ?
Me
No
Everything looks perfect in animation.
In real world : .............................🤐🤐
in real life sux.,., with cell jaming this shit not even tok tok..
You are quite correct. In the real world, U.S. adversaries almost never get close enough to even use their offensive weapons systems.
Ha ha true Russia said s-300 is best but failed to save moskva
Only good in animation...we saw how good it is in Saudi Arabia
Then the Iranians should have no trouble attacking targets defended by ASEA systems operated by American personnel. Knock yourselves out.
@@peterplotts1238 Iranians showed enough by downing US RQ-170 Sentinel...I prefer to knock you out 😉
@@d.j.9995 Is that right, D.J.? But you don't know anything about me. If you did, you might not find the thought of knocking me down so appealing. I certainly cannot blame you for concluding that all of us here have a strong tendency to weakness, given the events of the past year. But, the Biden administration does not speak for people like me. However, I do admire your command of the subject of military aviation. Instead of burdening yourself with thoughts of knocking me down, why can't we be friends instead, or at least friendly enemies.
@@peterplotts1238 War use to be my profession, French Foreign Legion and bad ass war experience before that. Military technology is my passion and I’m well informed who is doing what all over the world. Iran is not to be underestimated, we are talking about old Persia. They are a civilisation for it self in the Middle East.
@@d.j.9995 In that case, you would probably knock me down easily, but I would do my best. That is a very interesting background you have. You know, I even thought about joining the Legion at one point because I wasn't liking law school at all then. I wanted to be a soldier, but not just any soldier. So, I have great admiration for the Foreign Legion. To make a long story short, I finished law school, then I met a beautiful woman and we married. I stayed in America and had kids. I absolutely do not take Iran lightly. Iranians can be great people and their culture is ancient and more than worthwhile, but their present government seems very eager to kill Americans - and Israelis too. They want to be our enemies and I believe in giving people like that what they want. They don't speak for all Iranians either. Many Iranians have ties to America and they do not share their government's view of this country. I like military technology too, but I don't pretend to begin to know what someone like you does. It seems to me France produces some first-rate military technology. It always has. Did you take French citizenship and remain in France? Thanks for responding.
I really liked
But used on a ship to observe the hunting attack, shaving the sea water?
I thought the HARMS were gonna go for the ship, but went after the non-radar equipped rig instead lol
Very amazing in the world of American battle with the enemy.
Boran Kim Biz
This is French and Dutch
Achtung achtung!! Attention attention!! Rules of engagement are constantly changing. Year 2023/24 !!!
I THINK RADAR THAT HAS 360 DEGREE COVERAGE IS MORE ADVANCED THAN THAT WITH ROTATION TRANSMITTER.. 🤔🤔🤔
Ok, now let’s go straight to the main technical question. How many football fields can this radar cover?
Thales? Why not Raytheon or Northrop Grumman the world leaders in AESA technology.
That's a fallacy
Thales is vastly superior actually when it comes to naval radars. Thales Netherlands is 5-10 years ahead of them.
@@pieterveenders9793 Strangely enough i'm a US Navy veteran but i'm far more knowledgeble in aircraft combat systems so I have to take your word for it.
@@sean70729 It is mostly aviation sensors (predominantly radar) where Raytheon and Northrop Grumman excel at and are leaders in. Thales' subdivision Thales Netherlands (which was formerly Signaal) is pretty much exclusively focused on naval sensors, mostly radar, and dominate that field. Signaal produced the first digital radar in the world, the first AESA radar, and also the Goalkeeper CIWS, the superior cousin of the Phalanx. Goalkeeper isn't just superior because it uses a 30mm multi-barreled cannon versus the 20mm one of Phalanx, but it's the sensors and signal processing which make Goalkeeper so much better. While the Phalanx can simultaneously track up to 6 different targets, Goalkeeper can track up to 18, and Goalkeeper has had that capability from the very start when it came out in the early 80's while Phalanx originally was only able to track one target at a time and didn't introduce its multiple tracking capability untill it's much more recent upgrades in if I remember correctly 1998. Additionally, Goalkeeper has a much more accurate dual-band dual radar which provides it with unparalleled accuracy. The accuracy is so good that it generally hits an incoming supersonic sea-skimming missile within the first 5-6 rounds. In fact the Dutch Royal Navy has so much faith in its capabilities that somewhere during the 90's two supersonic sea-skimming missiles with dummy warheads were fired on a fully crewed Dutch Royal Navy ship to prove its capabilities. The engagement was filmed with ultra slow-motion camera's, and on that footage you can clearly see that the 1st round fired at the first missile only barely misses, landing in the sea, but the 2nd round already scores a direct hit destroying the missile (ruclips.net/video/6CHDjOCyixU/видео.html).
The SMART-L long range search radar and it's variant the S1850M are especially good and have been equipped on many NATO warships (among others of Denmark, Norway, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, UK, Italy & France), though the best is exclusively in Dutch hands at the moment. While most search radars have a range of about 400 km, and SMART-L originally had that as well, Thales Netherlands' improvement extended that to 2000 km. No navy on earth has that capability, in fact our radar has 4-5x the detection range of every other navy in existence. On top of that it's a LPI (low probability of intercept) radar and highly resistent to ECM and capable of detecting stealth threats as well. Our warships have a Dutch equivalent to AEGIS, which is even interoperable with AEGIS ships, such as those of the US Navy, with the difference that ours can detect ballistic missiles at 4-5x the distance as US Navy ships and either calculate a fire solution and intercept it ourselves, or we can relay it over the air to another NATO ship if it has a better fireing solution and let it take the shot. In fact we practised it many times by now (ruclips.net/video/6CHDjOCyixU/видео.html).
The US Navy does have a somewhat comparable capability, they also have an ESA radar for BMD with a 2000 km range like our updated SMART-L.... except it's literally a gigantic floating oil rig with a massive radome on top of it. My uncle was a NCO in the Dutch Royal Navy who retired a few years ago and he mentioned a joint test carried out by our Royal Navy and that of the US. A ballistic missile was fired at 1000+ km or so and the challenge was who could detect it first, your navy or ours. Not only did we detect it first, but our SMART-L didn't even skip a beat while doing so, it simultaneously tracked said ballistic missile and remained providing 360 degree coverage and tracking everything else in that 4000 km diameter dome over the ship. That US radar on the other hand would apparently only rotate 360 degree as it was scanning, but as soon as it did finally detect that ballistic missile it would stop rotating and aim the radar in its direction in order to track the target, only following said target while it was moving through space, thus making the radar completely useless when it came to all its order surveillance duties. When my uncle told me that I initially thought "no, it can't be, this sounds too wild, the US using a massive oil rig with a gigantic radome on it which they had to tow out to sea at a snail's pace in fear of it tipping over in rough seas, and it not even being able to do multiple simultaneous surveillance tasks, while our radar is compact enough it easily fits on top of one of our frigates and can do so much more and better than what the US has". But no it indeed was legit, you can find it in naval news sites with a bit of searching. That massive oil-rig mounted radar is this btw (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea-based_X-band_Radar).
Thales Netherlands makes a bunch of different state of the art naval radars and has made them for a century now, so there are many other groundbreaking radars and other products I didn't even mention in the list. But if you're interested in seeing some more of Thales Netherlands I suggest you watch the video where Naval News visited their facility in Hengelo, the Netherlands (ruclips.net/video/210z3RaJpxY/видео.html).
Strange that you chose to use an F-16 as your choice of depicted adversary warplane
Benjamin Fan there are two missile boats atacking the f16 destroy the missiles
@@claudiov5554 no the f16 are threats and are sending missiles to the oil platform.look at 1:40 in the top right rectangle it says threat 02 f16. And watch the trajectory of their missiles.
Of course an F16 will always be a threat to a non F16 nation....what is being depicted here is that no threat is incomprehensible ... Basically zero hype around the B2 & F16 in a battle space....you will go down
Sattelite for the win
I pray to the Divine Master, that mankind will one day start spending as much time, resources , and technology on finding ways to help fellow mankind, instead of finding more sophisticated ways to hurt, mame, kill one another.
This is a mostly defensive radar...
You're using an arcane desert mythology to try and will mankind into an Utopian future. The irony is amazing.
I feel so much safer in my bed knowing about your prayers.....
amen
and all this shit becomes just some study topics and nothing more..
Second animation not understand 😭
レーダー技術の紹介映像ですね。軍事研究家ペイソンコリンズ
but they are so big and inconvenient
Obviously you need and a big ship like a destroyer, if it is demanded to carry on board the Smart-L. If you are skepticism of buying a less heavy ship, and more inexpensive like frigate, the SM400 seems a perfect solution and for the upgrades needed in the older ships, the NS100 is a modern answer.
esta tecnologia tienen que ponerla a prueba con la fuerza aerea argentina.
wow
NISHIT JOSHI 2222F 14 qui tourne sur 20
TASOB?
Saab+Leonardo+Thales adl produsen radar canggih dunia.
Rakyat Indonesia berharap wil kedaulatan NKRI dpt d lindungi oleh alusista gabungan dr 3 produsen trsbut khususnya radar aktif+pasif @3 radar slma 2020 - 2024. Gbu-amin.
how you made this video can you plz tell me?
With an animation software, possibly Cinema 4D, but more likely something less sophisticated.
Try Blender
Pekné. Video
Is the destroy from china
🇲🇨🇲🇨👌👍💪
Os americanos tem que inventar um sistema que desligue o radar seja de avioes, navios ou terrestre do inimigo.
Você quer dizer tecnologia de interferência ou algo mais?
Philippine Air Force should fit their FA-50’s with AESA
los radares aesa sean hecho grafeno y los misiles hechos grafeno y las nuevas alas y colas sean grafeno aviones
balayage electrique
Solid!
KEK!
bubbles space craft.
So it can detect a B2 hahahahaa
Theoretically possible but the B2 Is an aircraft from the 1980s. So it's to be expected. I would be more worried about the B21 Raider.
Dear Santa...
👍
Asea have greek f 16 viper?
Radar is fore holywood educational by brain surgeon for perfect system not disclosed
AESA Radar कितनी दूर तक Detect कर सकते हैं। Please मार्गदर्शन करें।
जय मां भारती
za b2 vam je dovoljan i srpski neva sistem a f 117 sa lakocom obaramo
Zračne snage Sjedinjenih Država su povukle F-117 iz upotrebe prije četrnaest godina. Za dvadeset sedam godina službe uključujući tri rata, samo je jedan izgubljen u neprijateljskoj vatri - onaj koji su srušili Srbi. Dakle, zaslužni su što su uradili ono što nijedan drugi protivnik nije mogao, ali servisni rekord ovog aviona je bez presedana u njegovom uspjehu. Zašto mislite da bi NEVA mogla srušiti B-2?
This AESA technology was stolen from Russia from MIG 25 fox back in Japan 45 year a go that the U.S. know anything about this radar ability to detach motorable target.
😵
อื่อหึ .....
Not interested in French defense industry- Thales sod off
FLAT EARTH RADAR
Meiers Daniel Just a radar
Turks use this radar.
Lol... someone needs to get the graduates off the PR videos... this is so cheesy and vacant, it's hilarious.
Well this was 6 years ago. Now it will be like is the identified target a they/them?
pif paf
This can be jammed GPS. The other countries have jammers. EWF.. the size of a pack of cigarettes that would cripple and blind this the USA can retaliate with fire crackers :(((( lots to be learn
Weak system
It may be a weak system, but tell me how it is weak.
fake
👍