The Chevy Small Block is one of the Most Important Engines Ever
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
- Follow all our accounts below!
linktr.ee/dust...
Gear I use to shoot my videos:
(Buying through these links supports the channel)
Sony A7IV: amzn.to/3CaDvQY
Sony 24mm F1.4 GM: amzn.to/3C6sZKv
Rode Mic: amzn.to/2J0lrik
Tascam DR05: amzn.to/2LvYFjR
Neewer lights: amzn.to/2Xem68x
-Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS
Don't forget the 327
And the 307, and the 400
That 327 made a lot of HP
@@oldsguy354 The 400 was actually 401 in cubic inches.
@@Olds_Pwr Yep, 400.9 inches according to my books. I wonder why they didn't advertise it as a 401. Maybe they didn't want it to be confused with the Buick or AMC 401's. I know the Olds 403 got rounded up from 402.5 and it along with the Chevy small block 400 had siamese cylinders. I think they were the only GM engines that were outfitted with that unique liability, which was especially troubling on the Oldsmobile because they had to leave alot of expansion room for those gigantic 4.351" pistons. I know hindsight is 20/20 but skipping water jackets between the cylinders to make room for a ridiculously oversized piston bore probably wasn't the smartest engineering decision they could have made. I can almost hear the discussion at the planning meeting for that, "Here's my idea, let's take a small block and bore it so large that the engine displaces 50 more inches than it was designed to so it makes a ton more heat. Then we can reduce its cooling efficiency by 20%, and use the same lower end designed for much smaller engines and put the largest piston bore we've ever used on top of it. Once we get it to meet emission standards we'll enjoy a whopping 10 horsepower gain on a car that barely gets double digit gas mileage! What could possibly go wrong?"
And the 262, 302,and 307. And yes there was a 302 chevy. It was offered as an option so chevy could compete in the trans am series.
They forgot all about the 302 that was just an animal
-That ain't a chevy small block though.-
Well, shit. Learned somethin' new today. Thanks.
They were pretty nasty small blocks for what they were
Had one in a 66 deuce. One bad mf'er
Destroke a 400 with a 350 crank put 6"rods in it and think of it as the larger version of a 302 with the same rpm characteristics with 70+ more Cubic inches.....that's makes a nasty small block!
Your mom was just an animal
The 305 dominated the driveway .
You can get 400+ HP from one if you sink enough money into them. I wouldn't, but you can.
@@TheLionAndTheLamb777 you could get more with forced induction, i still wouldnt either, but you can lol
They also dominated the drive-thru. 😂
305’s ran forever. Low hp low reving long life, put in thousands and thousands of vehicles.
@@tmprillwitz oh we all know lol I'm a chevy master tech switched to an indy shop tech, I still get the old 305s all the time lol
You missed the 327 I pushed it to 425 hp
I have a 96 V8 305 in my k1500. 200k plus with no oil leaks/consumption. Kinda crazy. Easy to work on. An tons of parts.
and no power
@@678friedbed well no shit. Lol
I mean they are kinda reliable if you just drive around as a daily and don’t get them hot. But you get them hot and it’s all over
Yeah got a 350ci 5.7 and idk a lot about engine classification when it comes to blocks but it’s not that small. What does small block mean?
@@illegalpoptart9633 Small block just refers to the external dimensions of the engine. In the 40s and 50s, all manufacturers made small block and big block v8s. Small blocks were for cars, big blocks were for trucks and didn't really fit in cars.
What about the 327 the 302s and 400 small block Chevys?
I owned all of them. They were durable, gave a long service life and could be used in other applications in addition to automotive. There are many older boats still floating that use the small block .M
My brother has a huge old wooden Chris-Craft that is powered by two 283s that still run like a top.
It was appreciated for its compactness for an OHV engine when it debuted.
now look at the size of an LS compared to a 350. unreal how much power comes out of such a small footprint
I just rebuilt a 283 for a mate, they are such a pleasure to work on
From a Ford guy the 283 and 327s were really great motors. 327 especially could really get some high rpms and had great horsepower. 👍
@@thomasfarmer8686 I love my 327❤ it sounds so good without any sound mods
The 283 was one of the worst polluting engines ever made. Horrible design.
@@raginroadrunner no one gives a shit mate
@@raginroadrunnerB.S.😂
327 ,302 zapper ..
Don't forget about the sb 400.
71 caprice came with those
Junk
@@reekz1568 72-80
@@jarvislarson6864 remember they had the orange 400 badge on the lower front fenders?
@@jarvislarson6864 I swore the 71’s maybe later built in the year so 72 had the 400 sb
I feel the 383 stroker is the best option
It really is - I remember reading about the first of the car rag 383 stroker builds, called _Dragonslsyer_ in, iirc, Carcraft circa 1992, and the end result was 450hp, then. A mind boggling output for a NA small block running on pump gas. Today? A streetable 383 using current head designs and modern EFI and ignition is easily capable of 550hp on pump gas - when I went HS 3 decades ago, that was big block numbers.
@@machinist7230 Built and tuned mild for the street, they make such a wonderful and useful motor. Their balance of power reminds me of the 327, which didn't get a mention on this video. But I felt was such an outstanding engine for how it could be mild or wild also.
Use six inch rods if you are going to be racing it.
I’ve always loved the LS series for keeping that simple, pushrod design going. I was 18 and tore apart my valvetrain and put it back together with just a couple short 10 min RUclips videos 😂
Not to mention the 4.3V6. It had same bore/stroke, pistons, cam bearings, main bearings, valvetrain etc as the 350. They put them in the full size “WorkTruck” and a bazillion Astro/Safari mini vans and S10/15’s. I’d still have my 96 Safari if it hadn’t have rusted into nothingness lol. 🚙
Ah the 4.3v6 four cylinder power with v8 gas mileage
4.3 was a good v6
@@neilbrown82 🤣
@@neilbrown82 A 90hp 2.5L 4cyl. in a 1992 S10 would like a word with you.
@@kramnull8962 lol iron Duke slow turd
Thank you for pointing this out. We need history to learn what works.
Why wouldn’t U mention the 327 or the 400? Those were both excellent platforms. I get the 283 and 350 but a 305 😂
The 400 was actually a 401 in cubic inches.
@@Olds_Pwr Chevy 400 was 401? I didn’t know. So like the 396 was 402 but 396 was a cooler sounding call out.
@@Formerlywarmer Examples as the 350, 396 and the 402 all rounded up but the 400 did not. Could have been because it was around the time frame GM had the rule nothing over 400 cubic inches in an intermediate sized car. The 396 and the 402 were two different engines but Chevrolet still labeled the 402 as a 396 or a Turbo-Jet 400. Perhaps the different departments within Chevrolet was not talking to each other.
@@Olds_Pwr sounds reasonable 😂 MOPAR2YA
Old guy I used to work with used to talk about his 427 small block. Said it would tach up way faster than the big blocks and he was always the fastest car in the area. In a Nova I believe
To get 427 in a small block would take some fancy machine work. I don't know if it would fit. Cylinder wall thickness and crank to cam clearance would be a problem. I'm not saying it can't be done. I'm questioning if it could.
@@donmunro144 427/434 strokers are well established from the 400sbc. You are way behind the knowledge.
@@cuzz63 i never liked the 400. So I don't even consider it. I know that some love it.
What about the 327 and 400 they are just as important
The 283 was better than the 305.
Yes 305 don't like to Rev past 45-4800 no matter what cam is in it, I'd go with a 307 before I spent money on a 305.
cylinder bores are just too small in the 305
@@jarvislarson6864 that's all in the heads. You can build an animal 305 with the heads available; 300+ HP and 330+ lb ft torque is pretty easy to make with a 305 with the right heads.
Lmao yeah 305
@@silicon212 -valve shrouding has entered the chat.
Everything is better than a 305
I got 510 HP from a carburetor chev small block.
My buddy is a engine builder/ machinist and put together a simple 406ci that made 634hp on carb for a pulling tractor...sbc is the best size to power v8 ever produced
@@jarvislarson6864Especially if you’re on a budget. When I was messing around with hot rods & customs in the ‘90s & early ‘00s performance parts for small blocks were sometimes cheaper than the stock stuff. There was just so much of it out there! It was cheaper to build a warmed-over performance engine than it was to rebuild a stock 350 with NOS parts. That’s assuming you were shopping mostly from Jegs & Summit & not doing anything too crazy, of course. 🙂
@@grahamstrouse1165 I couldn't agree more...for example few years ago I picked up a set of AFR 190's for $500 with nothing wrong with them and they're on a scat & wiseco internals 383 that would cost 10k + for the same power in a LS
Ever work on Chevys? It seems like everything fits everything else. For years and years.
I will admit, those early 350s are a pleasure to work with. Much better than the tempermental LT1 I have now.
The funny thing is that, there are Japanese DOHC engines that are easier to work on than some of the modern GM pushrod engines
@@davidperry4013 Name one. I may be in the market soon.
DZ 302...Why didn't it ever get a comeback? They just let Ford go decades with making people believe they owned the monopoly on the 5.0 displacement, but they used to compete; DZ 302 vs BOSS 302.
The dz302 was made for 1 purpose. To compete in Trans-Am and when the Trans-Am series ended shortly after the dz302 was made it no longer had a purpose.
The engine wasn't all that great on the street for its time .. chevy had other small blocks making more power and competing manufacturers had engines making big numbers as well. .
Ford had made the boss 302 for trans-am racing to compete against chevys dz302
The boss (Cleveland ) 302 is different than the Windsor 302 that was produced from 68 to 2000/01 . Boss 302 had a short life span like the dz302.
And the ford 302 Windsor that was in the 5.0 mustangs was
Your last sentence is cut off...
They dropped the 302 because they changed the engine rule in 1970, allowing the 350 to compete.
305 Dominated junkyards 😅
only because of people's ignorance. it was a secret power house. 350 never made 1hp per cube stock
With the stock 305 format they were old dog motors. The power to dollar went to the 350’s. If built correctly the 305’s could be made as high rev monsters, but again the 350’s still have the most respect and resources.
@@Backyardmech1
The 302 engine Chevy made for the 5.0 liter Trans Am series of racing in the late 60's was the engine that would rev out real high with it's short stroke, it was essentially a 327 with a shorter stroke crank from one of the 50's smaller displacement V8's mentioned in this video which reduced displacement to 302.
You couldn't rev 305's any higher than a 350, they both used the same crank and therefore had the same stroke, they're even interchangeable and bear the same part number cast on them, the 305 was nothing more than a low cost solution for a more fuel efficient small block by reducing displacement, it was intended to be a low reving engine that made sufficient torque in the RPM range where passenger cars need it, it was basically just a 350 with the bore reduced to attain 305 ci.
General Motors made HO versions of the 305 as a performance option engine for Camaro's and even in HO Trans Am's in the 80's but that was simply a case of them using what was available at the time, they were pepped up a little with better cams and different ECU chips in them to up HP 10% or so but the fact is the 305 really wasn't very good performance motor, the bore vs stroke ratio isn't very good for a performance engine and aside from factory limited classes that called for stock displacement engine's no one ever bothered building them for performance.
@@DRNEGOLICIS 1st gen LT1 is typing...
305 was good at what it made to do. The problem lies in the people behind the wheel. I still have an all original drivetrain in my 91' RS Camaro 5-speed with 156K miles, and it runs as good as it did 30 years ago. Just have to do regular oil changes and filters. On a side note, don't underestimate the power of Marvel Mystery Oil.
283 for me!
everyone forgets a 305HO was around 300HP. a 350 never made 1hp per cube in any stock vehicle. 283 and 327 & 305 out performed it
🤫
Somebody forgot the 1970 LT-1 (350 CI, 370 HP)…
@@sking2173 just 70-71 thats the only time that happened 330 ftlbs too
@@DRNEGOLICIS - In your OP, you said “never” …
@@sking2173 op?
Still is way better than an LS out there
Never heard of 305 associated with peformance.
As far as the block goes it's the same as the 350, just smaller bore, that's it, it can be done.
Yeah this is true... But I've seen some pretty nasty 305s though but that being said people don't build 305s nearly as much but when you say Ford 302 which is a similar displacement engine... you think of performance with those engines and it's a smaller engine... What is it a 347 stroker you can build out of those and several other displacements...
@@motersickel strokers are fine for regular driving but larger cylinders with a smaller stroke are preferred for peformance driving
They actually made a 305h.o. and the 89' 5.0tpi 5spd manual camaro was the fastest modern until 98' ls1
Fifteen frvgv%#W
Chevy is just 100% JUNK!
You forgot the 327 that was a impressive engine
I've spent time in a camaro with a built 327 & muncie 4 speed that rode willys then my brother scored a 1979 Z-28 in mint condition with a stroker 406 (1973 sb400) bored .030 over running stroker kit & fully built out by a local machine shop, Approximately750-800hp...It Hauled!!!
327 best Chevy small block tbh
Not a single mention of the 327
Dont forget the 307 another great one its like a smaller 327
350 is one of the best motors in my opinion
I have the last iteration of the small block vortex 350s in my 1997 GMC 2500. Maintenance is still cheap and easy to do.
Vortec*
The Old Chevy Small Blocks, Were Great Engines For Sure, Although GM Really Cut Back On The Horsepower In The Mid 70's on Into The 80's, Although So Didn't Chrysler, And Ford The 60's And Early 70's Engines Were The Best ! 😅 !
I agree , with the exception of the 305 Chevy . It was an under-powered gas guzzler.
I have never been a big fan of gm but I know multiple old men with sbc 350 pickups with 400-500k original miles on them.
I'm more proud of the straight-six engines from the big three car makers. While very underappreciated, those engines are what powered 95% of cars and pickups for decades. Grab any old truck that was used for real work like farming, and it's most likely going to have a six under the hood.
Yep. The 300 six from Chevrolet is big for a six cylinder and can put out some impressive numbers too! 😁
good for work but suck on the highway
They are great engines but 6 cylinder engines are expensive to build for HP and cost much more than a conventional V-8 engine will for making good HP and torque. Look up Clifford 6=8 who has been building HP 6 cylinder parts for many years and see how expensive it is to build one . I found this out because although I have built quite a few V-8 street and race engines I wanted to build a hot 6 cylinder Ford 300 6 and found out how expensive it is with not nearly as much HP or torque as a V-8 engine so decided to forget doing one .
NEVER DID OR WILL EVER HAVE THE QUALITY CONTROL OF THE JAPANESE MANUFACTURERS.
THAT HAVE BETTER GAS MILEAGE, BETTER LONGEVITY AND STOLE THE CAR MARKET WHEN THE 1973 GAS EMBARGO TOOK PLACE. THAT'S WHEN MANY MADE THE SMART SWITCH TO TOYOTA, HONDA, DATSUN.
BBC stands for Big Block Chevy, nothing else, that is the only meaning of the acronym.
Government motors 👎
95 Tahoe 5.7 TBI 350,000 miles run like new
350, 3fiddy, easy to work on, easy to soup up.👍🇺🇸
Forgot the 327
You are 100% correct!
YOU LOOK OVER THE 327 SBC🔥🔥🔥🤔👌🏾‼️
Yes the sbc is a grate motor but the new ls motors are there new big brother
The little 283 is a screamer
Boat anchors.........thats all they are good for.
Just imagine where we would be without these first small blocks. All HAIL THE MOUSE
305 did not have any real power.
The small block Chevy NEVER dies.
The SBC died in 1991. After that GM Powertrain took over.
@@Olds_Pwr I'm talking about there are still in use nowadays in old Chevys, hot rods, etc.
I've put 10k miles on a 350 with a rod knock that has 3qts of Lucas and 2qts of 30 weight and still pulls like nothings wrong 😂😂 (it's a 78 l48 with north of 230k miles)
I am pretty much a Chevy/Pontiac guy all the way, and I want to state IMO the 305 was the biggest turd GM ever shat out.
I wholeheartedly agree...the 305 was gutless.😩👎💩💩💩
When the engines were built to last
I had a Chevy 302 with 4x48 webers in my Can Am race car. It was a thing of beauty.
I owned several small blocks some with all kinds of different cubic inch configurations.... miss those days....
We should talk about Chevy's big block V6 and maybe the twin 6 that would be interesting most people are unaware of their existence
The 305 I believe it was?
@@Olds_Pwr the 305 up to 74 I think then it was the 350s replacement
You forgot the most infamous Chevy small-block of all. The 327! They would eat up the 350. And a lot of Big blocks. I'll leave it to you to look up what the stock 327 biggest horsepower was. Building them and hitting around 400 horsepower back-in-the-day quite achievable. 600 nowadays. You mentioned the 305 which was a piece of crap until about 1989 in the trucks. There was a dismal 307 as well. Better 327 then the rest of them.
Small block all the way ! Ford or Chevy. Easy to work on. Cheap. Reliable. Probably why they don't make them anymore
Where is the Ford
We made almost 800hp naturally aspirated on a 360 cubic inch small block, chevy performance block, it was basically a beefy de-stroked and bored out 400 engine.
Just look at the other gm designs in the 1970s. It becomes obvious that the Chevy engine is a 1950's design. The LS engines are so far apart in time comparing them is like comparing seatbelts in a 2015 Chevy to seatbelts in a 1955 Chevy.
Small blocks were so incredibly versatile, it is the go to engine for a quick running build that'll keep food on the table. Keep a spare Chevy around, because you'll never know when that junk Kia you got on credit is gonna break down. That small block will always start.
THE REASON YOU HAVE THE LS ENGINE TODAY. IS NOT BECAUSE OF THE OLD CONVENTIONAL SMALL BLOCK CHEVY. NOT ONE DESIGN ASPECT OF THE OLD SMALL BLOCK CHEVY LIVES IN THE LS. THE LS FROM TOP TO BOTTOM, FRONT TO BACK, SIDE TO SIDE IS COMPLETELY BASED ON FORD DESIGNS. IT'S A REGURGITATED FORD 427 HIGHRISER AKA RAISED PORT 351 WINDSOR.
You missed the 327 is well😂
and the 307.
I would argue that the SBC engine family set the standard for most internal camshaft engine's since the mid 50's
305 dominated performance? Lmaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Me either. Roark M50 Mustang with just beat the living s*** out of them and the 350s
Roller cam 5.0.
Comparable durability and power: Dodge 360, Chevy 350, Ford . . . 302. Hm.
Yeah, not seeing the point of a 305 for a buyer.
I've got a 350 from 75 and all I've done is throw headers, intake and new carburetor at it and she starts up every time without fail I wish I could have been alive when they were new
I think he forgot a few variants. There was the 262, 265, 267, 283, 302, 305, 307, 327, 350, and the 400 small blocks. The popular ones being the ones that people remember.
Not gonna include the amazing 327?? I had an 06 Silverado Z71 crew cab with only 25k miles and that truck was amazing. I put a 4” suspension lift with 32” MTs on 18” rims , Super 44 Flowmaster exhaust, k&n cold air intake , and an Edge Performance programming chip. That truck never had a single issue (probably bc I didn’t mud but I pulled people out). No repairs just maintenance all the way to 180k miles when I sold her.
Sorry for the rant 😂 I miss her.
I used to be a big block fan...until I turned my 360 into a 413 stroker. SBC/Dodge LA series/Ford 335 series are all capable of over 400ci and 500hp and ft lbs when built right. The only stock BB that put up more factory torque was the Buick 455...at 510. Lighter engine capable of the same power and more rpm? Yeahhh sign me up.
1973 small block 400 is my favorite!!! 4.125 bore!!!
To Hell with the 5.3L which is the 327 of yester years the LS SUCKS!
Give me back the 5.7L/350 from 1995! It's better than the motors of today!
And why did the 305 suck so much? During my days as a mechanic in the 80's at a Chevrolet dealership the 305 was one of the most replaced V8 engine, and of course the Iron Duke of the 4 cylinder world. But damn, the 305 just sucked ass constantly. Just like when I moved up the street to a Cadillac, Rolls-Royce and Oldsmobile dealership the 4100 engine was maybe one of the most replaced engine ever. Steel and aluminum did not get along in the 4100 and the floating cylinders didn't help either. Oh well, many moons ago.
Ford needs to bring back the 300 straight six !!!!
A lot of people dont quite seem to get that 400hp out of a small block was a big deal back in the early 70's. Yeah it wasnt a big block but still. The high compression 1970/71 LT1 was no joke in its time. 11:1 compression was pretty big and ive heard of guys who'd shave down the heads on a belt sander and do little tweaks here and there and get some real screamers back then. I really like small block, I LOVE the big block amd I modestly respect the LS. I only dislike it because everyone and their mother LS swaps everything these days and thinks it makes em a bad ass cause they can run a turbo 5.3 or 6.0 and get 10 seconds or less. I can get into the 9's on and N/A big block. Shit im already in the 11's on a mild 454 big block. My old 400 sbc gapped quite a few LS' and it pissed off a lot of people hearing that they just got run down by a dump truck engine
I daily drive a numbers matching 1976 Monte Carlo with a 400 cubic inch small block.. 2000 miles a month in all weather.. it’s the most reliable car I’ve ever owned.
fun fact chevy brought back the 265 v8 for 94/96 chevy caprices. its the L99 4.3 v8 based on the lt1. the amount of times ive had to pop my hood to explain my 4.3 caprice is not a v6 is hilarious 😂 people just don’t know
Today, it's common to see a naturally aspirated 550hp sbc. More so with the stroker engines. My 383 dynod 530hp @ 7,200 and 580tq at 5,100
Yeah another video where we pretend that the Ford 302 and 351 didnt exist. 302 set a standard for small displacement power, 351 was just a 302 with a taller deck, with a huge aftermarket for both. Chevys 305s were boat anchors and dime a dozen in scrap yards. Everybody always needed a built chevy 350 to compete with a Ford 302.
Alright this guy knows nothing about chevy small block. We have LS engines cause of fords and chevy and Chrysler. Fords every other valve, gms lower end and mopar heads . But we been making LS power since 90s. So LS is infant and with all advantages still is only keeping up. 😅
You said the 305 was a dominator in the 80s LOL😂. They barely made enough power to pull a 1/2 ton pickup down the road. And you forgot the 302s and 327s like others mentioned. The old heads gotta tell you about the old 302s in the 1st gen Camaros and 327s with double hump heads.
Been there and totally agree! Built a 301 in 1967, my 61’ Impala was too fast…..engine new less than 300 miles, never had an oil change, someone liked it. It was stolen and stripped…….got the body back, never found out where it went!
I've had a lot of small Chevys, 307, 305, 350. I learned something. Replace with a Dodge 340.
1971 351 boss was the king of factory small block power 385 hp only 10 more than the Chevrolet but i liked that engine a only 1 year make i did have a 1970 375 hp nova and dodges 340 under rated at 275 they definitely had close to 100 more than that but the Chevrolet 350 is the most famous ❤had many vehicles with a variation of some small block Chevrolet under the hood definitely the cheapest to build😊
My Firebird with a 305 has outlived two 350s I’ve had in 1500s,, that motor is bulletproof
Man .. One of these days I want to rebuild one of these small blocks for a project car. I hope that day comes when I have the room and extra cash because it always looked fun. My father was big into muscle cars before I was born and had a 390bbf falcon in my early years. It was amazing. After parents divorced it was like that part of him died but deep down I've always wanted to learn for myself. I think a nice G body or Fox body would be perfect. Someday... Someday.. ❤
The eighties wasn't GMs finest hour. The 305 was lame. Many a 350 (from trucks to Vettes) suffered rounded off cam lobes.
Main Caps Walking on the bottom of the block, no skirts,
Timing marks at one end of the engine, distributor at the other,
Water running through the intake, Have to drain the coolant to change the intake.
Oil pump, INSIDE the pan,
Oil filter underneath the engine.
rocker bolts pressed in the heads, no rocker shafts.
As they first appeared, no, not a great design.
I Built a lot of them, But they were never my favorites, But the junkyards Were full of them. All the car magazines and the after market push the hell out of them, to the point they were practically racing themselves. For along time, the after birth, I mean MARKET, didn't supply anything else.
265 V8 SBC it's awesome 283 it's even better but my favor from back in the days was 327 that was something o had a Corvette with a 327 and a 4 speed transylvania it was super fast
Just rebuilt my 350/5.7 throttle body other than some machining and valve seat work the old girl went back together and fired on the first try…rather simple….
Incorrect. The 51 Chrysler hemis were on a small block design. Chevy is not the end up be all. It's super mass produced that used parts were plentiful. That's why they're so popular.
Ha. I just tore apart the 350 in my dad's old wrecker while watching this a second time. Beat you by a full second!
He skipped the 327, but mentioned the 305... dominant...???
Parts interchangeability is the friggin key here for me!! A buddy told me that if you ever had to, you could pull a piston off a 350 and drop it in a Harley.... Just beautiful eh
Don't forget that Chevy made enough to fix every Ford and Dodge that needs a reliable replacement, just JK guys, but they made millions of them
The chevy small block was a boat anchor that survived as long as it did by being continually just good enough to get the job done and still pass emisssion testing until it couldn't. It survived as long as it did because of corporate laziness or stupidity on GM's part. And what was it finally replaced by? The LS engine, a craptastic engine so similar to the Ford windsor the cylinder heads are practically interchangeable.
Yes, please continue to tell us how GM is innovative and isn't always late to the party and showing up in a generic version of whatever Ford decided to wear to the party 3 years ago.
305 is spelled "anchor". first round of making a terrible, tiny engine that people could use to say "I got a V-8!"
My grandfather told me a long time ago about how tough the 283ci motor was. Apparently it was too bulletproof and it was discontinued.
I've owned them all over the last 58 years. Also had a 262" as well in a 79 Monza
Did it have a busted off spark plug next to the firewall on the driver's side?
@@Simon-nautic Not that I recall. I do remembering unbolting the motor mounts and lifting that side up to change the plugs. Real tight fit.