Grenfell inquiry report accuses fire brigade of ‘serious shortcomings’
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 окт 2019
- It is two years since the terrible fire which killed 72 people at Grenfell Tower. Subscribe: bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe
The first phase of the public inquiry into what happened that night is not officially due to be published until tomorrow. But the conclusions were leaked to news organisations and published by a newspaper last night. The 1,000-page report includes fierce criticism of the London Fire Brigade and concludes fewer people would have died without its failings. A warning: this report contains images of the fire some people may find distressing.
-----------------------
Get more news at our site - www.channel4.com/news/
Follow us on Instagram - / channel4news
In 2014 Grenfell residents warned that the building was a fire trap.
The firefighters were faced by a fire for which they had received no training and which was supposed to be impossible. The big mistake on the night came from the people answering the emergency calls with the advice to 'Stay put'. Only today have I learned that the actual full advice is 'Stay put UNLESS AFFECTED BY HEAT AND SMOKE'. So who made the decision to abbreviate it?
The blame lies elsewhere, with those who made the decision to clad the building on the cheap, therefore creating the conditions for the fire to happen. I was pleased to hear that the inquiry has already ruled that the building was illegal, those truly responsible for this tragedy should be quaking in their shoes at the prospect of part 2.
Guess what every condo building has in Thailand alarms plus sprinklers in rooms and corridors and fire hose reels on every floor hardly rocket science.
Phil Sophia cause this one was clad in a flammable tiling for aesthetic reasons.
Phil Sophia somehow it’s always the primarily the government’s fault that a developer fucked things up and cut corners and not the developer.
The justice for Grenfell lady is right the buildings failures should've been the first act. All failures need to be looked at, anything that couldn't and should've been done differently needs to be addressed. Makes me feel so sick and upset every time I think of this tragedy. RIP to all of those who lost their lives. Justice must be served.
Shazin I disagree. The Fire Brigade response needs to addressed first so that their actions and failures can be rectified right away and changes implemented in order to make us all safer today! Instead of in many years time, by which we may have had another disaster happen.
it seems very unfair to blame the fire brigade, especially when they undoubtedly worked so hard to extinguish the fire. it sounds like semantics, but they believed they were dealing with a fire in a building, not a building on fire. that cladding should never have been fitted - it shouldn't be legal for it to have been fitted. according to a sky news documentary on here, in scotland it would have been illegal to fit that cladding to high-flats, but england never brought in such a law. years down the line, that cladding's still legal and still fitted to god-knows how many buildings. and we're blaming individual fire-fighters for not saving enough lives.
I agree we shouldn't blame the firefighters they were just just doing as they were trained, they risked their lives that night going against orders to leave the building continuing to attempt rescues with depleted BA cylinders a lot of firefighters that night were surprise that firefighters didn't die and a lot of them thought they would die and still continued to go forward.
What we should be doing is blaming the fire brigade as a institution for it's failures that night lack of proper training in regards to highrise fires, lack of proper equipment, failure to enforce fire safety standards and failure to learn from past events among other things as well as the other organisations and companies that have a part in this chain of events, its like blaming the builder they just got paid to build it you need to blame the people in a position to do something about it.
It's kinda like the phrase "don't shoot the messenger" don't blame the grunt for doing their job blame the people who gave them their orders.
I agree so much. Responsibility is being dumped onto lower grade workers and "Lord this" and "Dame that " earning hundreds and thousands are going scot free.
How dare these Bastards hang our brave firefighters out to dry, if cheap flammable, untested cladding hadn’t been used, all in the name of saving money, then normal firefighting protocol would have been sufficient, you cannot have a hundred people clambering down flights of dark, smoke filled stairwells, choking to death and falling on top of each other, when firefighters are trying to go up, dragging hoses and other heavy equipment with them, that’s why people are told to stay put, tower blocks where designed to keep residents safe until the section where the fire had taken place, could be extinguished and bought under control, those that brought and had the cladding installed on Grenfell, tower are guilty of murder, not our brave, heroic firefighters, but as usual, the dirty cunts in suits will walk away, having blamed somebody else, they, along with the BBC are despicable beyond belief !
Exactly correct. Glad not everybody is buying the whitewash going on.
If you separate the cladding issue, as that is not what this part of the report is about, the fire service response was terrible. How can the chief say that she would not have done anything differently? Take some responsibility for the part your department played in not getting people out of there and changing the plan!
I live in a 20 floor apartment block in Sydney and we are ALWAYS told to evacuate, no matter what, I don’t know how looking at that fire and the way it spread you could ever tell people to stay, it defies common sense...
So when you have a fire on the 1st floor, you want everyone to be subjected to having to evacuate past the fire. I don't think that is a good idea.
Also, in the UK the government as systematically taken away responsibility from firefighters to inspect buildings and shops, so we now have fire wardens who go to the fire scene and report rather than sending out fire engines. All to save money of course. We are the 5th richest country in the world yet we try to cut back our emergency services at every point.
These poor souls were abandoned (in more fatal ways than one) by the very groups they put their utmost faith in.
9:18 incredibly well said.
It was Ramadan and many Muslim men and youth were coming back from their morning prayer and they helped out many people from the fire.
Good on the men who saved life
There are still many many unsafe high rise buildings all over the country but that's OK ,just blame the fire services it's easier.
I would like to stand with LFB captain on what she said: BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT FIREFIGHTERS HAVE UPON ARRIVAL AT SCENE THEY DID EVERYTHING THEY COULD TO SAVE LIVES. THE TYPE OF INSULATION USED SHOULD NEVER BEEN USED. They wouldn't have any way to know that the building was covered in highly flammable material.
They got dispatched to a small fire, got a quick knockdown of this fire, but the exterior was engulfed in a matter of minutes. In a ‘’normal’’ building exposure would be limited to 2-3 floors above and in this case holding back an evacuation makes sense to avoid accidents in the staircases, prioritize people from floors near the fire and keep clear to emergency personnel.
The renovation process, certification of the building (with private inspectors) and the lobby of plastic industries that made this type of material legal to use in buildings are the real criminals. This insulation should never be on a building, there are way better and safer alternatives overthere, but not as profitable to some industries/politicians.
LFB can learn a lot from what happened and make improvements, but at the moment they couldn't do much more with the information they had.
The fire fighters on the night are NOT being blamed. Everyone, including the Chair of the Inquiry Moore-Blick, acknowledges that firefighters gave their life’s blood that night to save everybody but were defeated by the fire spread via cladding. In fighting this fire using their high-rise procedure, they were trying to do the impossible.
But senior fire managers are being castigated for sticking to the “stay put” policy for this building for more than an hour after it was clear that the building was effectively lost. Had they abandoned “stay put” much earlier more lives would have been saved. When they did change approach at 0247 another 32 were saved who would have been dead if “stay put”
had continued. Pity they didn’t do it earlier. And these managers are paid enough to take responsibility for their acts and omissions.
When these tower blocks were built they were designed for a 'stay put policy' during a fire. Trying to evacuate everyone during a fire is difficult. It was the refurbishment that made Grenfell Tower a tinder box. The cladding, pvc window frames and replacement of fire doors with non-fire resistant ones was the fault of the Local Authority and their contractors. Trying to blame the LFB for this is disgraceful.
every thing that Moyra Samuels had to say was bang on..! that`s an intelligent person.
if only we had more people like her at the wheel of England.
but business is business and people are there to feed it.?
It's disgusting how this 'whitewash' inquiry chose to apportion blame on the LFB , the people knew something like this could happen (again)..... I'm gutted for the people directly affected by the fire and also those first responders who did all their training and equipment would allow them to do.
They shouldn't blame the firefighters they were just just doing as they were trained, they risked their lives that night going against orders to leave the building continuing to attempt rescues with depleted BA cylinders a lot of firefighters that night were surprise that firefighters didn't die and a lot of them thought they would die and still continued to go forward.
What we should be doing is blaming the fire brigade as a institution for it's failures that night lack of proper training in regards to highrise fires, lack of proper equipment, failure to enforce fire safety standards and failure to learn from past events among other things as well as the other organisations and companies that have a part in this chain of events, its like blaming the building they just got paid to build it you need to blame the people in a position to do something about it.
It's kinda like the phrase "don't shoot the messenger" don't blame the grunt for doing their job blame the people who gave them their orders.
Blaming the LFB and making it the scapegoat,this is disgusting.
While the government that commissioned the inquiry hasn’t change the cladding regulations.
To blame it on the fire brigade is disgusting,they didn't know the building was built on the cheap with dangerous materials.
The Fire chief scapegoat should resign!/s What about the builders who put the cladding/torches on the tower blocks?
The builders should be jailed.
Builders just did what they were paid to do, not their responsibility. They didn’t mislead anyone. Someone else signed off on the cladding, knowing full well it didn’t meet minimum fire safety requirements in order to save a little bit of money. That person/persons hold sole responsibility
so many are at fault for this tragedy ! the building design , the laws and recommendations on building such a complex , the lack community knowledge on how to cope with an emergency , etc. - IT STINKS ! - money is still playing too big a roll in how this is being viewed ! LEGAL ACTION SHOULD HAVE ALREADY BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THOSE CRIMINALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS HORROR , AND AGAINST THOSE WHO MADE IT EVEN WORSE !
I can't believe they blame the firefighters like 😡 the fire service give the advice on the structure of the building! They did not put that highly flammable cladding on it!! The council are to blame and those poor people died because of them. My heart goes out to them all and i can't ever imagine what they have through 😢 i do have respect for our emergency services who are over stretched and work so hard. Im sure what they saw that day will effect them for the rest of their lives too, god bless you all xx
i think its because they told them to stay inside
@@Gencturk92 as they do with all high rise, they didn't put that highly flammable cladding on it though, the council are to blame not the firefighters
@@KH-xv5gm yeah i know but people were constantly being told to stay inside, just like in the twin towers on 911
@@Gencturk92 that's nothing to do with the firefighters. 343 firefighters lost their lives too on 911
I think the only things the fire brigade really did wrong is evidently not adequately preparing for a major building evacuation situation, and then on the night failing to decide in a properly timely manner to change the instruction from stay put to evacuate. The first is on them entirely - it’s not common but in a city like London it is a real possibility that you’ll have to evacuate an entire large building, you should prepare for it. The second it’s easier to understand - the people on the ground that night had no way of knowing that many of the fire safety elements of the building weren’t working properly. Fire doors didn’t close, the ventilation system didn’t work, the windows didn’t keep the fire out as long as they should have, meaning it wasn’t safe for people to stay as long as they could otherwise. So it would take some time to understand that and change your approach. But that goes back to the lack of practice somewhat - they may have had better communication on the night if they’d practiced such a large scale event.
I can not understand why someone would stay in a burning building just because the emergency services told them to.
mayfield norris people people were scared and fear makes people unable to think straight or take a rational decision, that’s why so so many put their trust in the emergency services. They kept giving them the same messages stay inside every time they called or asked them.. insane put fear has allot to do with it. May they rest in peace..
@@Traveling.contess same advice was given to people on 911
In a properly designed building, in most cases, staying put may well be the safer thing to do. With fire doors and sprinkler systems and ventilation systems and so on, the amount of time you can safely stay in place with a fire in another area of the building (like not inside your actual flat) can be quite long, long enough for the fire to be put out. By contrast people opening doors and so on as they try to leave can actually increase airflow to the fire and make it worse, plus people can get hurt on the stairs trying to evacuate. The trouble here is, of course, that Grenfell was not at all a properly fire safe building by modern standards, and pretty much every single element that makes it safe to stay put was defective (like the automatic closers on doors) or simply missing (sprinkler system.) The fix is really to not have buildings so poorly done, and perhaps in the interim have a list of buildings that are not properly fire safe so the emergency services can change their advice for people in those buildings until those buildings are fixed.
If the stair well was full of smoke and you were told it was safer to stay put?
LFB incident commanders had no training on evacuations. That's their job! WTF!?
How do you train to do something that's not possible? How is the building design LFB's fault? The local council is 100% at fault. It was their building.
DonaId Trump
Stop listening to the bullshit of the Liberal, left wing press.
@@nickbreen287 why would a fireman tell people to stay indoors when the actual course of action is to tell them to evacuate that is the standard procedure especially since there was no obstruction when a fire alarm goes off everyone is evacuated and never left im glad something is being done to them for doing something so foolish
@Phil Sophia you are mixing it up with residents and the work place, in areas of residence it is the responsibility of the fire service to help evacuate members in the building and ensure their safety this responsibility also falls on the owners of the building as they should ensure that there are fire exits for people to escape and your presumption that 300 people will be squeezing through the doors is inaccurate as with the fire brigade a perfect system implemented would prevent such a disaster evidently faults are on the company that made the building and the LFB where the chief herself said the stay put policy used was wrong in this situation
@Phil Sophia i'm curious who this expert is as it was always their duty to ensure the safety of others which involves evacuating civilians from a disaster evidently someone needs to work on the definition of what a rescue involves, yes there are measures made beforehand especially in a workplace but this doesn't negate the fire services responsibility to provide support what you ultimately argued is that their job is only to take out the fire however that doesn't fully secure a civilians safety the inquiry itself even claims that its was a systematic failure on their part from lack of training and no plan B, it gets worse when you realise had the stay put policy been removed 27 minutes earlier more people would be alive, what a messed up world
From memory, these people spent a lot of time complaining at their management company before the fire about the risks, don't suppose you can complain directly at the fire brigade. I think they probably know as well, it's just another part of the puzzle in their tragedy that the fire brigade didn't know what they were doing.
So they tell us poor countries have a corruption problem.
And richer countries have an even bigger corruption problem.
The fire brigade was cut to the bone, and the stay put advice was based off the government rating the cladding as fire safe.
To blame the LFB is a total failing of the Public Inquiry when the obvious cause of the tragic deaths of innocent people was the relaxation of proper Building Controls allowing a combustible cladding to be fitted to a structure that inherently relied on the individual flats being self contained units that would not allow the spread of fire.
the fire being excessive and being a major issue is the fault of the manufacturers and constructors but the method to sort the issue out is also to blame for the end result that "stay put" policy evidently cost lives and now what needs ot be knows is why take such an odd method of keeping ppl in then evacuating especially those who were told to stay in had no obstruction and could be escorted out as is the firemans job
@@naimhussain6013 No - The Architect designed the building as self contained units to comply with Fire Regulations which fully fits with the remain in place instructions given by the LFB.
@@Mike_5 except the building itself was not suitable for such a rule as evident by what happened rules were broken and from that end its clear such a policy is not appropriate to be used just because someone claims its fine to use if it is clear the building isn't then there is mo justification to use such a policy
@@naimhussain6013 No - Take a step back and think about what caused the fire to spread externally to the building
@@Mike_5 thats pretty irrelevant when we are talking about fire regulations and the evidence that the regulations themselves were flawed and the course of action taken by the council resulted in a building not fit for purpose and deemed hazardous had they had not taken such a decision this disaster would be averted had the stay put policy not been implemented less lives would have been taken
They shouldn't blame the firefighters they were just just doing as they were trained, they risked their lives that night going against orders to leave the building continuing to attempt rescues with depleted BA cylinders a lot of firefighters that night were surprise that firefighters didn't die and a lot of them thought they would die and still continued to go forward.
What we should be doing is blaming the fire brigade as a institution for it's failures that night lack of proper training in regards to highrise fires, lack of proper equipment, failure to enforce fire safety standards and failure to learn from past events among other things as well as the other organisations and companies that have a part in this chain of events, its like blaming the builder they just got paid to build it you need to blame the people in a position to do something about it.
It's kinda like the phrase "don't shoot the messenger" don't blame the grunt for doing their job blame the people who gave them their orders.
There is no way that firefighters Coul d have extinquised the blaze because it was extremely flammable material. The guy could only reach so far with the hose and the firefighters worked through confusing and thick smoke. It's vile to blame fire fighters. Try are just covering it up... Sickos
LFB made mistakes, but that should never happen in the first place! It's danger to shift blame to LFB and ignore the companies and goverment policies that allow a building like this to exist in first place. Profit over life, thats the real issue
it was the stay put policy that killed them is why they got the blame, even though thats a building policy not fire service policy but yeah
@@Gencturk92 the stay put policy would work just fine if the building was not covered in flammable materials
@@lu4414 yeah i know but sometimes stay put policy can be bad like the people on 9/11 were told to stay put aswell in the twin towers, lot of people were trapped and jumped out.
They should have just left the building alone as it is or even if they were going to regenerate it they should have put fire extinguishers or something but i get that they can get vandalized by people in council estates
@@Gencturk92 evacuate +1000 from a building in panik is not easy
@@lu4414 it depends on the scale of the fire, blueprint of the building, fire equipment's. grenfell was a death trap because the only staircase to exit was caught in flames because it had gas pipes fitted near them and they blew up.
Deregulation by out-sourcing to the manufacturers; & incompetence. Looks good tho', diversifying the LFB.
Bull. We know who is to blame and it isn’t the heroes who run into burning buildings.
how dare they blame the fire brigade ... what about the cladding and several other factors how dare they blame the fire brigade !!!
Unbelievable
What resign
They should be in jail
The London fire brigade commissioner should Resign now, especially after all they knew about the dangerous Cladding.
Get to the route of who is putting up unsafe buildings , taking shortcuts , taking back handers .
The fire service has protocol in the event that the buildings won't spread fire so they can't foresee shoddy workmanship. The fire in Barking earlier this year burnt to the ground in eleven minutes , So bring these people forward to account for these deathtraps they have built and also the people who passing these buildings fit for safe living.
ALWAYS THINK FOR YOURSELF ! ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE ASKED TO RISK YOUR LIFE ! IT'S YOUR LIFE , THINK !
X X Yes! So true!
💯 I ageee my first instinct will always be to try save myself and my family.
You cant replace lives you can replace money. Words to live by
Multi flats have been here for over sixty years. The stay put, even after Grenfel still applies. Only if the flaws like Grenfel are hidden are flats compromised.
thats right blame the fire brigade ..those people were HEROS they did what they could it wasnt their fault the cladding was flammable
Is blaming the LFB a way of shifting blame, Its believed that Chelsea Council saved a lot of money on using cheap materials.
England's fire brigade are top quality
Can we say the same about our government.
So many innocent lives lost down to cost cutting, they were told years before about safety issues,
It's not the lfb better action could of been taken but they were also shocked as the root cause it's the council and the cladding company
Dont you dare nlame the fire service. Its not their fault its iur goverment not giving a danm about us the people. Heres a fact for you. If the goverment would have gave the fire brigade the funds they needed they would have had more adoquate equipment to deal with the fire. The fire team was there within 3 mins of the first phone call. How can they be blamed ? How can they be chastises. How can the goverment not take responsibility of this situation. They still havnt removed deadly cladding from buildings in the uk. They dont care they are here for maximum profit thats all. Why do you think the public came together to help everyone ? Because the goverment and lcoal councils didnt give a toss. So sad still to this day. Rest is peace to everyone who lost their lives in the incident.
StretchGames HD No one is above criticism, everyone can do better.
@@airhab i know this but the whole blame looks like its aimed towarss to fire service when if the goverment would have never cut their budget they could have saved more lives and done more
StretchGames HD This isn’t the final report, this part was on the immediate response. Phase 2 will focus on the building and the council’s actions.
@@airhab ok must have took it in the wrong way. Hopefully the gov and council will finallydo their job and fund what needs to be funded
I think I these hard inward looking reports can be vital to keeping the fire service strong. Also we must remain vigilant with safety enforcement.
Who approved the cladding on the building.....which is on other buildings also....
My viewpoint is 1 stairwell is stupid beyond all measure
This is gives me nightmares
All residents who didn't ignore the fire brigades advice to wait for rescue died.
No, the fire brigade did go get some people, just not many.
same as 9-11. you run from any life threatening danger-not stay with it. my God.
Who & what is to blame well you dont have to be a rocket scientist to work it out if your pour petrol over yourself and light a match and die is the fire brigade to blame for not gettin to hose you down quick enuff ..how about askin why would you clad/stroke cover what should be the safest building to be in a fire situation...? Who decided to cover this block of flats in this flamible stuff...firemen are trained to go into fires to rescue people not fight fire frm the ourside..?
but they told people to stay put
💚 Grenfell 💚
~~~{{♥}}~~~
Yes, but if you over occupy (eight people, instead instead of Two) what on earth do you expect!
That your building is not actually a torch and that the fire brigade will know how to handle things properly?
Put blame on the fire brigade when it was beurocratic
Liability lies with the Manufacturer of the cladding and developers clear and simple. No one else really is to blame. The firefighters were caught off guard as a typical building usually won't spread so quick. Firefighters shouldn't be blamed on evidence and reactions based on hindsight in which the cladding was found to be so volatile. Yes, lessons in better response and organization can always be learnt from this but blame shouldn't be put on the firefighters on the ground unless there was complete negligence.
@Phil Sophia I still feel manufacturers are still the ones to blame (there are the ones that introduced the product). I would say the certification of the product was not robust enough. The certification may be ratings based but I am sure it was not really known that during such a situation that the cladding would be so voilatile. Building control inspectors in their scope ensures the buildings fitness based on product certifications/spec, installation QCs conforming to current building regs/standards. Product wise its very similar towards the treatment of asbestos products in Buildings. It was once deemed appropriate for installation once. Who bared the cost of replacements. I am sure the government took a fair share of the cost as well as building owners. How much liability was actually put on the manufacturers of the asbestos that supplied and introduced the product (which was later deemed illegal and unsafe).
The LFB made mistakes but the main cause of Grenfell will always be austerity.
What?
Any further devlopements re the charging of the culprit who started the fire and fled with his suitcase after knocking on his neighbours door to warn them to leave?No? Thought not. He was no doubt an illegal.
@Phil Sophia nonsense.He could have attempted to put the fire out and 'they are not happening everyday'He is guilty of negligence but of coutse being an immigrant he is also a 'victim' of our dreadfull society.Hes probably living in a comfortable rent free appartment as a reward.
@roger woodhouse Why the need to discuss the nationality/status of the man (not culprit) in whose flat the fire tragically started? If this fire had taken place in Chelsea/Belgravia would you feel the need to research the individual’s nationality and make the same accusing comments? This is immigrant blaming at its absolute worst ☹️
@@laneywhite534 The whole block was overcrowded with immigrants of doubtfull status.Theres no denying that.That fire was caused by negligence on the part of the immigrant whose flat caught fire.Blaming a faulty appliance ls just another example of 'deflection' and the usual playing of the 'victim 'card.If the flat had been occupied by an English family no doubt there would be prosecutions pending.I make no appologies for the accusation of failure by this occupant to tackle the fire and /or his negligence in allowing the fire in the first place.
@Phil Sophia any proof of that claim .Was he ever questioned publicly? .Does anyone know anything about this person?Was he ever before a public enquiry?Where is he now.?Have any of those living illegally been deported? No answers to these perfectly legitimate questions are there?
roger woodhouse www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p066rd9t This might help with your preconceived social media messaging. As previously mentioned, episode 15 specifically deals with this. I find it is generally best to research things before commenting and looking stupid
Blame the Tories Boris for austerity cuts and lfb for arrogance
They're so ungrateful
Cathy Newman made mistakes in summarizing her interviewee’s responses on Jan 16, 2018. Shame on Cathy Newman!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Get over it, its been more than 18 months and you're still raving on about it. Yes she is flawed, aren't we all.
Chanel 4 News is silly
Reminds me of a song money money money here comes money nice Vila in the sun that's why they are blaming everyone
Vote labour
Vote labor is vote Muslim and Islam. Don't forget Jeremy corbyn love bin laden very much
Vote labour party is vote illegal immigration for Muslim countries and Islam terrorism
Punish labour party and liberal Democratic party
No more could have been saves, there dead, no one is to blame the firefighters did what they could, get over it. Stop blaming fire fighters there not to blame. It just happened.
Now relatives want coppensation not for there relatives but for them selves. Shame on you.
no they are deffo to blame especially with the stay put policy which was inappropriate in this situation
@Phil Sophia it gets even worse, Commanders failed to spot the compartmentation had failed meaning “stay put” policy should be lifted. it's even crazier to know that the inquiry also states that the stay put policy caused more deaths
@Phil Sophia and don't start brining in legislation as some form of defence or justification, no english law holds a major precedent in cases especially when they are constantly changing we have had judges making such modifications and parliament making many reforms that its come to the point that using legislation as a defence is pointless and holds mo weight and no placing responsibility and setting out the public service duty isn't me getting people killed but further ensuring their safety and wellbeing i find it interesting that you focus on them losing their job when the cost is someones life lool, it's people like you why this country falls back the ignorant the ones who can't face such truths and prefer to ignore and defend it as much as they can, it's pathetic and funny most of the time well the truth hurts but it's clear the LFB hold some responsibility and hopefully justice will be served and the victims will find peace
@Phil Sophia actually the stairs were not fit for people to go through around 2:47 am as stated in the inquiry in fact the inquiry themselves found the time you specified was exactly when they should have been cleared and gone had it been 'unsurvivable' why would they reach such a conclusion in fact its all the result of lack of planning and training there were firemen who went in first which was before the fire spread but there was evidence of the stay put policy to be dropped since it was evident in the inquiry that the fire had spread to other compartments, whats your next excuse.
@Phil Sophia no one said it's unusual but its clear as a result of the stay put policy as a result of the chief neglecting the fire fighters telling her to repeal the policy as ppl were getting killed yet she ignored it the statement from the inquiry provides reasonable grounds for liability had there even been an obstruction on those stairs no fire fighter would want the policy repealed and the fact the fire was breaching other compartments on those grounds alone the stay put policy would need to be removed, whats your next excuse
Torys cuts that killed em
Who cares?
Kingspan are cheap and dishonest