"The very thought of you".....just beautiful, Mark! Great arrangement. Love the Eastman brand. Well built, great quality, outstanding value for money guitars.
I always wanted a Gibson 175, but the UK price is now getting beyond most people’s budget....plus the whole world knows that Gibson quality has really taken a serious dive in recent years. I was VERY nervous about buying a guitar made in China, but I took the plunge and went for it with a UK stockist. Thank God I did ! My Eastman 372 is the natural violin finish model and it is a totally stunning guitar with fantastic playability, great tone, beautiful timber, perfect fretwork, perfect cellulose finish, a nut cut to perfection, and easily a match for any Gibson ( having played many over 40 years). My Eastman was £1050, and a Gibson 175 was over £3500. For anyone looking for a great arch top, but fearful of Chinese guitars, I would really recommend this Eastman model. I seriously cannot fault my guitar in any way, and bang for buck, it knocks Gibson right out of the park. I was a stupid guitar snob that only wanted the word “Gibson” on my headstock........what a fool !! I’ve learnt a great lesson with this Eastman.
I got the same with violin finish: superb, and real good jazz tone; but I had to lower the strings and adjust the pick up height to my taste of play and tone.
I am with you brother! I bought one of these in February and I LOVE IT. The ES-175's are way too overpriced, and Gibson no longer is even making them. I bought the sunburst version and it's gorgeous. Can't stop playing it.
Dude you should know that Eastman actually started with violins and cellos, which occupied more than half of the US market. So its craftsmanship is really solid to make good archtop guitars.
They sure did use a proper player. What a delight to listen to, and a consummate command he has.... It makes a pleasant contrast to the embarrassing melody/harmony free zone in which a lot pick up a guitar on RUclips with not a clue how to play LOL
Very fine playing - mucho kudos to you. This well-done offering from Eastman is a Gibson ES-175 copy done really well. Subtle differences but it's an ES-175 copy and that's just the truth. Bravo Eastman!!
I bought one yesterday in Oregon. Only mine came with a very cheaply made case. Love the guitar though. Mine is the classic color. The sunburst is beautiful .
I read an experienced luthier and designer talk about the poor working conditions under which these guitars are produced. His point was that between the quality of materials and craftsmanship and the low price something has to give and you wouldn't wish on anyone to live and work like this. It sure took all the enjoyment out of playing an Eastman guitar for me. It's a stark reminder that we need to be aware that we are living in an interconnected world.
In that article you read, did that luthier and designer talk about how they were confronted with those terrible working conditions during their factory tour or did they assume that the working conditions had to be be terrible since they couldn't find any other reason for the prices being that low?
Mark Lucas, you are exceptional... If there is any guitar I want demoed I look to your videos first... you apply the most appropriate treatment - applications of tone, selection of amps, use of pedals, stylistic approaches, licks and tricks needed for THAT specific instrument or gear being demoed. Success and prosperity to you sir!
ES-175 copy. I had a 2005 Gibson ES-175 and later an Epiphone Copy that I put Gibson pickups, pots and wiring in. It was good too. I let friends talk me out of them. Think I'll get another Chinese copy and keep it. Eastman sounds good too.
How does this compare to the T49v in your opinion? I'm willing to spend the extra cost if the 49 is an overall more articulate and quality instrument. Hard to decide because they're such nice pieces.
I have the T49v. Some immediate differences are that the T49 has upgraded pickups, ebony fingerboard, bone nut, and mildly “relic’ed” finish. It sounds amazing, with all the nuance heard in this video. The things I mentioned above comprise the main differences. I use 10-47 flat wound Thomastik-Infield strings (pricy but nice!). I am not sure if it sounds more articulate; that may be more on the player.
A lot less than it is worth. People complain these are to “bright” compared to the “Mare” that spawned them, but try the heavier brass tailpiece and tunomatic and these protests become mute. Also my 372 is wired the “old” way where ALL Pots come into play. These guitars answer prayers that companies that live off the aspirations of the genre but do not really pass it on so to speak. There are some huge new comers playing these fantastic boxes.
Hi Mark! My compliments to you! Just sayin' you guys should correct the above description for this guitar: you say that the guitar has laminated top/back/sides, while on the description it is written carved top/back. "Floating pickups" but they are not!!! And the cutaway is a Florentine, not a Venetian!!! :) But the guitar is marvelous and your playing skills are something else! Bravo!!! :) V.
+Dr. David Walter Aguado Actually, the credits that start at 5:10 at end of the video state that the amp used is a Fender '65 DRRI Limited Edition. Thanks for checking out our channel!
I was wondering the same thing, having just bought one of these myself (incredible guitar btw, and not JUST for the price) but his is a Byrdland, not an ES-175, which is what this is based on. Honestly I don't think there's much of a difference. Byrdland has a thinner (less deep) body and slightly different horn shape but I think that's about it.
If you want a good example of a "rock" player who used a 175, check out Steve Howe from Yes. His main guitar looked almost exactly like this. However, these are not identical guitars... the Eastman has its own thing going on with a maple neck and ebony fretboard. Gibson has mahogany and rosewood, respectively, which is why some say the Eastman has a brighter tone, the Gibson warmer/darker, though that's a pretty subjective statement haha
@@alftupper9359 No, but the word "review" already has meaning. You may not know this but words are defined by their usage, not by law. The way we use the word review (and hence, the way it is defined) does not apply in the case of this video. This was a "demo" (demonstration), not a review, that's all I was saying. The title was wrong and not descriptive of the content. It was a good demo, and I was happy to view it.
Fair point @@alftupper9359 . One could accurately use the word "overview" in addition to "demo" to describe this video. And again I agree, it was a nicely done video. However it still not a review. lmgtfy.com/?q=define%3Areview
Wow! one of the few times someone demo'd a Jazz guitar what it was meant to play for. Great presentation of the pick-ups as well.
"The very thought of you".....just beautiful, Mark! Great arrangement. Love the Eastman brand. Well built, great quality, outstanding value for money guitars.
wow! combining the two pickups really gives a great tone!
Great demo! Played as it should be. Just got one of these and loving it! Thanks for a very helpful review.
I always wanted a Gibson 175, but the UK price is now getting beyond most people’s budget....plus the whole world knows that Gibson quality has really taken a serious dive in recent years. I was VERY nervous about buying a guitar made in China, but I took the plunge and went for it with a UK stockist. Thank God I did ! My Eastman 372 is the natural violin finish model and it is a totally stunning guitar with fantastic playability, great tone, beautiful timber, perfect fretwork, perfect cellulose finish, a nut cut to perfection, and easily a match for any Gibson ( having played many over 40 years). My Eastman was £1050, and a Gibson 175 was over £3500. For anyone looking for a great arch top, but fearful of Chinese guitars, I would really recommend this Eastman model. I seriously cannot fault my guitar in any way, and bang for buck, it knocks Gibson right out of the park. I was a stupid guitar snob that only wanted the word “Gibson” on my headstock........what a fool !! I’ve learnt a great lesson with this Eastman.
I'm on the same position you were. I think I'm going for this.
I got the same with violin finish: superb, and real good jazz tone; but I had to lower the strings and adjust the pick up height to my taste of play and tone.
I am with you brother! I bought one of these in February and I LOVE IT. The ES-175's are way too overpriced, and Gibson no longer is even making them. I bought the sunburst version and it's gorgeous. Can't stop playing it.
Dude you should know that Eastman actually started with violins and cellos, which occupied more than half of the US market. So its craftsmanship is really solid to make good archtop guitars.
Gorgeous guitar! Beautiful tone. Eastman guitars are top-notch pro quality instruments. Good demo!
Who is the reviewer? I love this guy's playing and his excellent reviews!
And superb fingerstyle technique!
Outstanding tones
They used the proper player to demo this style guitar :-) Great tone! Almost reminds me of a Gibson Byrdland guitar only $7000 less :-)
I was thinking more along the lines of a 175 :)
Oh yeah...you sometimes see this young person who just plays a funk 3 chord wonder thing or drown in OD....great review this one!!
They sure did use a proper player. What a delight to listen to, and a consummate command he has.... It makes a pleasant contrast to the embarrassing melody/harmony free zone in which a lot pick up a guitar on RUclips with not a clue how to play LOL
Very fine playing - mucho kudos to you. This well-done offering from Eastman is a Gibson ES-175 copy done really well. Subtle differences but it's an ES-175 copy and that's just the truth. Bravo Eastman!!
Perfect guitar for mark sounds beautiful
Eastman make fantastic guitars!
Mark, great demo, love your playing. Thanks, I want one! Cheers China !
I bought one yesterday in Oregon. Only mine came with a very cheaply made case. Love the guitar though. Mine is the classic color. The sunburst is beautiful .
loved that bossa nova groove beginning 3:35
I read an experienced luthier and designer talk about the poor working conditions under which these guitars are produced. His point was that between the quality of materials and craftsmanship and the low price something has to give and you wouldn't wish on anyone to live and work like this. It sure took all the enjoyment out of playing an Eastman guitar for me. It's a stark reminder that we need to be aware that we are living in an interconnected world.
In that article you read, did that luthier and designer talk about how they were confronted with those terrible working conditions during their factory tour or did they assume that the working conditions had to be be terrible since they couldn't find any other reason for the prices being that low?
@@JK-up7vz I'm sure there was much assuming going on. Ahh assumptions....
Gibson- low wages, bad conditions.
such is an excellent sound
Mark Lucas, you are exceptional... If there is any guitar I want demoed I look to your videos first... you apply the most appropriate treatment - applications of tone, selection of amps, use of pedals, stylistic approaches, licks and tricks needed for THAT specific instrument or gear being demoed. Success and prosperity to you sir!
ES-175 copy. I had a 2005 Gibson ES-175 and later an Epiphone Copy that I put Gibson pickups, pots and wiring in. It was good too.
I let friends talk me out of them. Think I'll get another Chinese copy and keep it. Eastman sounds good too.
How does this guitar compare to a 371? Is it identical other than the bridge pickup?
these slay the Ibanez artcore, that sounds so good for the price!
Beautiful. Wow.
always a delight Mark. or should I say "Tricky Fingers"??
I have one, great guitar.
How does this compare to the T49v in your opinion? I'm willing to spend the extra cost if the 49 is an overall more articulate and quality instrument. Hard to decide because they're such nice pieces.
I have the T49v. Some immediate differences are that the T49 has upgraded pickups, ebony fingerboard, bone nut, and mildly “relic’ed” finish. It sounds amazing, with all the nuance heard in this video. The things I mentioned above comprise the main differences. I use 10-47 flat wound Thomastik-Infield strings (pricy but nice!). I am not sure if it sounds more articulate; that may be more on the player.
Nice Mark!
Great playing great guitar for any price
Thanks for doing an excellent review of this Eastman guitar. It sounds fabulous.(due to your guitar skills)How much does this guitar sell for?
+Major Wheelock See the link in the video description for more information about this guitar and for pricing!
A lot less than it is worth.
People complain these are to “bright” compared to the “Mare” that spawned them, but try the heavier brass tailpiece and tunomatic and these protests become mute.
Also my 372 is wired the “old” way where ALL Pots come into play.
These guitars answer prayers that companies that live off the aspirations of the genre but do not really pass it on so to speak.
There are some huge new comers playing these fantastic boxes.
That intro !
Lacquer finish?
Yes.
Hi Mark! My compliments to you! Just sayin' you guys should correct the above description for this guitar: you say that the guitar has laminated top/back/sides, while on the description it is written carved top/back. "Floating pickups" but they are not!!! And the cutaway is a Florentine, not a Venetian!!! :) But the guitar is marvelous and your playing skills are something else! Bravo!!! :) V.
Great playing, Mark. What kind (model) of Fender amp is that? Cheers, Dave.
+Dr. David Walter Aguado List of gear used in all our videos is at the end of the video in the rolling credits...
Thank you. Cheers, Dave.
+N Stuff Music Actually, the name of the guitar is the only one mentioned at the end of the video. No other information is given. Cheers, Dave.
+Dr. David Walter Aguado Actually, the credits that start at 5:10 at end of the video state that the amp used is a Fender '65 DRRI Limited Edition. Thanks for checking out our channel!
+N Stuff Music Thank you, man. You went Hollywood on me. Great video. Excellent playing.
Cheers, Dave.
Is this guitar close to what Ted Nugent used ?? I mean, would it make a good substitute.
I was wondering the same thing, having just bought one of these myself (incredible guitar btw, and not JUST for the price) but his is a Byrdland, not an ES-175, which is what this is based on. Honestly I don't think there's much of a difference. Byrdland has a thinner (less deep) body and slightly different horn shape but I think that's about it.
If you want a good example of a "rock" player who used a 175, check out Steve Howe from Yes. His main guitar looked almost exactly like this. However, these are not identical guitars... the Eastman has its own thing going on with a maple neck and ebony fretboard. Gibson has mahogany and rosewood, respectively, which is why some say the Eastman has a brighter tone, the Gibson warmer/darker, though that's a pretty subjective statement haha
That dam amp buzz!
Florentine cutaway. Not Venetian
And just like that China gets street cred...wonderful playing. Love the Fender Deluxe Reverb as well...
Nice playing and thanks for the info but this is just a demo.
This was not a review.
sunriseshell
Has some law been passed about this then?
@@alftupper9359
No, but the word "review" already has meaning.
You may not know this but words are defined by their usage, not by law.
The way we use the word review (and hence, the way it is defined) does not apply in the case of this video.
This was a "demo" (demonstration), not a review, that's all I was saying. The title was wrong and not descriptive of the content.
It was a good demo, and I was happy to view it.
@@sunriseshell
He gives a fair run-down of the guitar's features. What did you want, a laboratory report?
Fair point @@alftupper9359 .
One could accurately use the word "overview" in addition to "demo" to describe this video.
And again I agree, it was a nicely done video.
However it still not a review.
lmgtfy.com/?q=define%3Areview
I hate Marc, he is so bad for my bank account, selling me every guitar he touches...
Y-Y-Yeah but does it Ted Nugent?