As always, perfect performance. I do suggest, with the greatest respect for your interpretation, that this is a bit fast. Just a bit slower would allow more if the inner works to be clear, This is a delightful piece in the ebb and flow of the lines of point and counterpoint. Clarity is essential. In the opening measures of the 3rd movement - wrong notes were hit. Better to go at a slower pace and get it delightfully correct that rush it for whatever purpose and make slight errors. And, yes, all performers make bloopers, no crime in that but I gues we all hold you in such righ regard and have great respect for your technical skills.... You understand, I think.
I agree fully. I know this piece so well, that I have learned to expect the performance to lie between certain parameters as it pertains to tempo, ornamentation, etc.
The organ is out of tune. Why? Surely for a performance of M. Dubois they should have had the organ spot tuned. I find that though he plays this piece with technical perfection it seems too fast as do other pieces on this organ. The stop changing is distracting and noisy. There is a reason why tracker organs went out of favor and this is a good example of that. Difficult to access for tuning, noisy action, hand operated. This is 2000 not 1400. With his rapid playing I note that there are a few mistakes in the performance. That is accepted. No performance is perfectly perfect. but this is one of the best of the current European organists, skilled in technical as well as artistic rendering of an incredible range of music.
Moooolto bravo, grazie mille!
Always enjoy your performances and watching you play. Wish many years of continued good work/concerts.
Your performance is enchanting! Does anyone know where I can find the organ
sheet?
Insane technique on 3rd movement, amazing
Very good, but, IMHO, a little bit fast
I am absolutely certain, that Vincent came in first in this race...
Superbe... à quel endroit ?????
...en partenariat avec Renault F1 Team bien sûr !
As always, perfect performance. I do suggest, with the greatest respect for your interpretation, that this is a bit fast. Just a bit slower would allow more if the inner works to be clear, This is a delightful piece in the ebb and flow of the lines of point and counterpoint. Clarity is essential. In the opening measures of the 3rd movement - wrong notes were hit. Better to go at a slower pace and get it delightfully correct that rush it for whatever purpose and make slight errors. And, yes, all performers make bloopers, no crime in that but I gues we all hold you in such righ regard and have great respect for your technical skills.... You understand, I think.
I agree fully. I know this piece so well, that I have learned to expect the performance to lie between certain parameters as it pertains to tempo, ornamentation, etc.
The organ is out of tune. Why? Surely for a performance of M. Dubois they should have had the organ spot tuned. I find that though he plays this piece with technical perfection it seems too fast as do other pieces on this organ. The stop changing is distracting and noisy. There is a reason why tracker organs went out of favor and this is a good example of that. Difficult to access for tuning, noisy action, hand operated. This is 2000 not 1400. With his rapid playing I note that there are a few mistakes in the performance. That is accepted. No performance is perfectly perfect. but this is one of the best of the current European organists, skilled in technical as well as artistic rendering of an incredible range of music.