Elvis & Nixon reviewed by Mark Kermode

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 июн 2016
  • Mark Kermode reviews Elvis & Nixon. The untold story of the legendary meeting between the King of Rock ‘n’ Roll and the President of the United States.
    Please tell us what you think of the film -- or Mark’s review of the film - below. We love to include your views on the show every Friday.
    www.bbc.co.uk/5live
    Fridays at 2pm on BBC 5 live.
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 33

  • @MajorAskew
    @MajorAskew 8 лет назад +26

    Surely this should have been called "The Pres and Presley".

  • @nickstoli
    @nickstoli 8 лет назад +17

    Neither actor looks remotely like the person he's playing. Nor do they sound like them, either.

  • @theelvisguru9490
    @theelvisguru9490 3 года назад +4

    I really thought I would hate this but I loved it. It’s an interpretation of their meeting with wild artistic licence but it’s great fun

  • @johnbarry1965
    @johnbarry1965 8 лет назад +1

    Mark is the doppelganger of the great and fabulous Johnny Burnette. Love the programme xxxxx

  • @MHolden1989
    @MHolden1989 8 лет назад +19

    Frank Underwood can time travel, I see.

    • @soundslave
      @soundslave 8 лет назад

      I thought the same thing

    • @nitzky8920
      @nitzky8920 8 лет назад +1

      They're gonna cast Kevin Spacey as slimy politicians till the end of time...

    • @dani.892
      @dani.892 4 года назад +1

      @@nitzky8920 not anymore...

  • @bluesjazznotes9436
    @bluesjazznotes9436 8 лет назад

    I look forward to check this one out, 2 fine actors that I like very much. Great review Mark.

  • @theelvisguru9490
    @theelvisguru9490 3 года назад +1

    The answer to why he wanted the badge is this: it would give him the right to carry a gun over state lines which is what he wanted to do when he went on tour.

  • @youchoosealex
    @youchoosealex 8 лет назад +2

    film reviews should always end "...but that's probably just me."

  • @pavanbhatia389
    @pavanbhatia389 7 лет назад +1

    How long have you got....?
    Well, just a couple of seconds....!
    Classic.

  • @molesticles
    @molesticles 8 лет назад +1

    I was hoping this would be great. Kevin Spacey and (only recently) Michael Shannon are 2 of my favourite actors. Seems a silly premise. But it's a quirky bit of history in reality. Now realized on film, though quirkily, I hope.

  • @kevingonzales5149
    @kevingonzales5149 Год назад

    It was born on January 8th and Nixon was born on January 9th like myself and Muhammad Ali on 10th.

  • @nellgwenn
    @nellgwenn 4 года назад +1

    Elvis was allergic to chocolate. A fact tat is brought up in the better movie Elvis Meets Nixon.
    That's what makes the M&M's line funny.

  • @HoussamNekkaa
    @HoussamNekkaa 7 лет назад +1

    I love. this pic

  • @felyxmillicent6538
    @felyxmillicent6538 2 года назад +1

    Michael Shannon is such a bizarre choice to play Elvis.

    • @TCBElvisAPresley
      @TCBElvisAPresley Год назад

      That's why I never worked up any enthusiasm to see it, and still haven't. Michael Shannon was around 42 -- not a lot older than Elvis was (37) when he met Nixon. Still, I couldn't get over how old the "Elvis" character looked in the trailer. So there was that, plus the entire trailer had that familiar feel of a disrespectful parody.

  • @owenwilliams105
    @owenwilliams105 6 лет назад +3

    The badge was not an honorary badge, it is a bona fide badge which made Presley a legitimate federal agent. The position of 'Agent at Large' was a real position although unsurprisingly Nixon and Halderman are not familiar with it. Brits do not understand the implications of such a badge - it empowers the holder with the credentials and all powers of a federal agent and allowed Presley to cross state lines with firearms and drugs and be virtually untouchable by local police forces. I have seen the badge and it very impressive - the film is nowhere near as good as the original with Rick Peters as Presley. Although intended to lampoon Presley it is fairly accurate as a piece of docudrama.

  • @attackofthecopyrightbots
    @attackofthecopyrightbots 5 лет назад

    lol i like how most of this isnt actually a review

  • @attackofthecopyrightbots
    @attackofthecopyrightbots 5 лет назад

    i feel like the "funny" parts didnt actually happen
    besides those scenes it was good

  • @mclark8857
    @mclark8857 8 лет назад

    first

  • @vincentcrooks2528
    @vincentcrooks2528 5 лет назад

    Elvis wanted to be a nark and took a 14 yr girl to be his wife?Him and M J would of gotten along well.

  • @tolar9
    @tolar9 8 лет назад

    Who's Nixon? Who's Elvis? Who thought today's audiences would care?

    • @paulwhitelaw3824
      @paulwhitelaw3824 8 лет назад +6

      Two of the most famous men of the last 100 years.

    • @tolar9
      @tolar9 8 лет назад

      Fame is fleeting. I mentioned Bob Dylan to a 28 year old a while back and they looked at me sideways and asked, "Who's that?" Go poll two dozen average 18-24 year olds about Elvis and Nixon and see how "famous" they are. And throw in Art Carney, Gertrude Stein, Lauren Bacall, Lech Walesa, Golda Meir and Niels Bohr for an even bigger reality check.

    • @paulwhitelaw3824
      @paulwhitelaw3824 8 лет назад +7

      Solution: stop conversing with stupid 28-year-olds. Also, none of those other people you mentioned are as widely known as Elvis or Nixon. And you know that.

    • @tolar9
      @tolar9 8 лет назад

      Paul Whitelaw: No need to be racist, my friend.

    • @ethandrood
      @ethandrood 5 лет назад +2

      @@tolar9 Fame is not important (Chaplin). Their work is what matters.