La plus belle musique que j' adore entendre c' est le 9 Cylindres de ce splendide Polikarpov I-16, mon préféré! Bien sur le légendaire Mig-3 tout comme l' Antonov An-2!!! Bol'shoye Spasibo pour ce partage
I know im asking randomly but does any of you know a trick to log back into an instagram account?? I somehow lost the password. I would appreciate any tips you can offer me
Ich staune immer wieder wie viele I-16 es noch gibt. Was unsere Luftwaffe von denen in die Erde geschickt hat. Die AN-2 ist eines der schönsten Flugzeuge. Überhaupt die russischen Flugzeuge. Aber auch unsere sehen schön aus.
Flew in New Zealand's Yak3M at Hood Aerodrome 2 months ago.......STILL buzzing about it! Also, how did I not know about an airworthy Mig-3?!!! PS it was us Kiwi's that got all the i-16's Rebuilt.......You're Welcome World.
+ Susan Butler There are three restored Mig-3s, all completed in Russia with Allison V12 engines. (Checking on #3 because I think the Russians were trying to put an original Mikulin V12 in it, unsuccessfully if I recall.)
Now that the Russians have I-153, I-16, Yak-3/9 and MiG-3's flying up again. Its time for them to put together a Lagg-3 and La-5fn back to flying status. Also Il-4 medium bomber would be the icing on the cake and God forbid if I ever get to see a Pe-8 heavy bomber in my lifetime :D
I saw Yak 9 in Air show at Travis AFB, it was found by accident in some old factory all disassembled. So it got assembled with the original parts, made in wartime. Its all red in color, so I believe there are more birds with original engines out there
Wonderful, I had no idea any of these were flying! Apparently there are 3, all utilising Allison V12s. I would love to see one sometime, the MIg-3 is one of the most beautiful aircraft ever made. It looks like it's going 400mph sat still, and that is a hell of a roll rate.
AN-2 at the start of vid. The moust impressive thing is that it creator Antonov were largelly crityciced for it development - and it is flying now with almous 70 years of service.
Wow...an airworthy MiG-3! I have seen Yak-3/9's with Allison engines before, they are great performers. I-16's are neat. The engines in the I-16's sound a lot like Wright R-1820 Cyclone.
MiG-3 is the high-speed and high-rise in the world of combat interceptor in 1940. Миг-3 - самый скоростной и высотный в мире боевой перехватчик в 1940 году.
Yes thank you...not many made and under circumstances of their mission I'm surprised not more were destroyed. It wasn't the best bomber of the war but its a unique one that hardly many know about and it was Russia's attempt at creating their own first real long range bomber in similar dimension if not larger then the B-17. WW2 was Russia's lesson of total warfare and its because of it that Russia is a superpower today!
What plane do you mean ? Both Mig and Polikarpov were frontline fighters, and the AN-2 was designed after the War as a multifunctional airplane but not as bomber.
This is not a replicas, it is the aircrafts restored in Novosibirsk, about which a movie filmed in high definition, a link to one series of which I have left above. When testers flew on this MiG-3, they were greatly surprised by its excellent handling, in all historical documents say that the MiG-3 did not have a good handling at low altitudes (this plane is designed as a high-altitude interceptor)! It was the fastest fighter in the beginning of the 2nd World War, at the height of its speed exceeded 600 km / h
They have done a beautiful job on the restoration. I hope one day we will see an La-5 or La-7 in the sky again. there seem to be very few survivors of Lavotchkin's aircraft.
Since you seem to know something about these birds; do you know whether the Mig-3 in the clip still sports its original engine or is it converted to Merlin as most ex-Soviet fighters are these days?
Вы возможно не в курсе событий. Практически все самолёты, восстановленные из обломков, проданы за рубеж. Эта новосибирская группа зарабатывет деньги на памяти наших лёчиков, на их крови. Там нет бога.
@@ERK191 Вы возможно не в курсе событий, все работы по реставрации оплачивают буржуи, поскольку СибНИИА, где их восстанавливают сам с трудом выживает. Облетывает самолеты директор института.
that first plane kinda reminds me of the otter that we used in the north of canada a lot .. it was a very dependable plane .. you could trust that it would take you where ever you wanted to go in the north .. winter or summer .. very tough plane ..
Great video, it looked like a good airshow... :) :) I'm a modeller and am working on a MiG-3 right now, and hope to build an An-2 later on, and I was wondering if I may use parts of this video to illustrate the REAL aircraft flying and moving in the air, as part of my building reviews?? You will be given FULL CREDIT, of'course, with your channel name on the video clip and a link to your channel in the description. Thanks in advane and hoping for a positive reply.. Rob / BasicModelling
Миг 3 был высотный истребитель _ перехватчик и показывал хорошие результаты на высоте от 3 тысяч метров.а фашисты на ме-109 проводили бои от 1000 до 3000 м.где миг уступал.
Спасибо за работу! "Миг-3", это высотный истребитель. Его рабочая высота от 2 700 метров, где ему не было равных. Это перехватчик. Нерадивые командиры истребительных полков, посылали работать в нижние эшелоны. А нерадивые лётчики и там, на высоте, гробили машины. А те, кто побеждал не страхом, а умением, побеждали и на малых высотах. Благодаря Покрышкину, разработавшему тактику ведения воздушного боя и проведения наземных операций с применением взаимодействия авиации между собой на всех эшелонах высот, и благодаря другим Героям Советского Союза, в том числе других родов войск, была показана возможность бить врага в любых условиях, чем они и заслужили звание Героев. Малодушие и вредительство, как и выход из боя после отстрела боезапаса, стало более заметным остальным лётчикам, которые освободились из под влияния трусов в полках. И так везде. Поэтому позже страна предала своих Героев и стали почитать всех погибших и военнопленных не сбежавших из плена, называя их всех героями. А в бою погибает неумеха, как и в жизни, доказывая своими глупыми смертями, что товарищества нет и быть не может, как не может быть Суворовского принципа побеждать. Своими гибелями ещё и делали неадекватными остальных воинов. А что с народом сейчас происходит и не говорите. На "И-16"("Ишачок") лётчики летали и кто умел побеждать, потом говорили, что самолёт этот, кто освоил, он потом мог летать на любом легко, мол те, кто утверждает противоположное, они трусы. "И-16" немцы во время Войны прозвали "Rata"(крыса) за его маневренность. Факт такой, что налёт у немецких пилотов перед первым боевым выходом был не менее 270 часов налёта в тренировках. А у Советских лётчиков иногда не состовлял и 3 часов в первый год войны. Однако били фашиста и в хвост, и в гриву. Значит было нечто иное, другое знание, которое давали во время Сталина. Это понимание и предают периодически люди в себе. Это понимание закономерностей законов Вселенной по имени Совесть.
The Mig-3 was as good, if not better than many western WW2 fighter aircraft. Luftwaffe pilots were told to treat this fighter with a great deal of respect in combat, many did not and ended up paying the price!
Может я не понимаю, объясните, пожалуйста: что может видеть перед собой пилот МиГ-3 во время взлета и посадки? Я так понимаю, только задранный капот самолета, взлетной полосы он не видит, то есть, рулит вслепую? Что то может видеть сбоку, высунувшись из кабины, а все остальное, как, наугад?
На посадке все видно, потому что посадка на основное шасси выполняется, потом можно сбоку смотреть, ну и фонарь открыть. На взлете самолёт в начале разгона сбоку смотреть, а потом он на две точки горизонтально выравнивается и все прекрасно видно. Попробуйте игру War Thunder, виртуальный кокпит, там все станет ясно.
even the shape say 'speed!'. It was the fastest high altitude plane in its day, faster than bf109 and spit, but germany go low where it mig-3 is ineffective
Поддержу АНку(стоит в п.Луговой Моск обл.по случаю люблю побродить рядом)Насчёт МИГа и сейчас лежит на шкашфу в виде модели.сложная машина так и не могу поднять.Хочет скорость при взлёте и хорошую полосу.не реклама Дмитров кто и где летает
I was fortunate to see an I-16 display at EAA. Would love to see the MiG-3! What is it using for an engine? An original, or was it converted to Allison or Rolls Royce power. I know the Il-2 flying here was converted because parts for the original engine are hard to come by.
Were the original engines Klimovs? Doesn't really matter what is in it though, the big V-12s all sound great! I wonder if any of the original engines are still capable of being run. I'm surprised there are two Bf-109s flying with the D-B engines. Those must also be next to impossible to find parts for.
AFAIK the Mikulin engines were not very reliable and had temperature/cooling problems. So, I guess those who restored the airframes decided to play "safe". But OTOH it might be difficult to get hold of any Mikulin engine anyway. Don´t think there are many complete or "almost complete" suitable left for airworthy restoration ...
The i-16 was the first plastic model plane I ever built. Very cool looking airplane, bit out dated to fight the bf-109 but still a cool plane for its time.
Это наши деды и прадеды при многих конструктивных недостатках при тяжелейшем положении страны во всех смыслах переломили хребет нацизму. не америка, не британия и уж тем более не франки. СССР колоссальными жертвами тружеников и солдат. При коммунизме. При товарище Сталине. При условии, когда таджик и башкир и татарин и русский был не чурка и не чича и не урус-а все были товарищами. Товарищами, у которых была общая цель и одна идея. Ленин показал, что религия не имеет смысла, социальность и коммунизм работает лучше...Вспомним Украину...Все мы когда то были товарищами...
Politics aside, I really do like the looks and sounds of that Mig and I-16. Its a shame the government they had behind them was equally as tyrannical as the one they were fighting against.
Tom John "shame the government they had behind them was equally as tyrannical as the one they were fighting against." Equally tyrannical? Not even close. Let's let the *Jews* decide which was worse, and the Ukrainians and most of the people in what later became Eastern Europe. While Stalin certainly was paranoid people died because the system itself was inefficient and a lot of peasants became superfluous when they introduced tractors and other farming machines. If you played a charade and said:"Hurray for Stalin!" they'd let you live. Stalin also wisely focused all efforts on arms manufacturing because he knew they lagged far behind Nazi Germany and if they would be invaded they'd have no arms with which to defend themselves effectively. Hitler himself admitted to the Finnish marshall Mannerheim (and this secret recording by the Finns still exists) on the latter's 75th birthday in 1942 that he (Hitler) had no idea how much arms and arms manufacturing capability the Soviets had. The Nazis did indeed rely on outdated information. So as despicable as Stalin was he did save his own people. The bottom line is that as hated as he was by the people they at least had a chance for a life with him. Play the charade and hope the old man croaks. With the Nazis you couldn't play any charade no matter how much you kissed up to them. Ask the Jews - who tried to play it for a while thinking they would be spared. Their very ideology was based on racial biology and how superior people had the right to defeat and exterminate "inferior people". Eugenics was taken to the extreme in Nazi Germany. Look up Lebensplan Ost, which is what the Nazis had in mind for the Poles, Russians, Ukrainians and other "eastern people" once the war was over. Planned genocide on a scale which would have dwarfed the holocaust of Jews. The Nazis had no peer there in all history. They sat down at Wannsee in 1942 and discussed how to exterminate the Jews most efficiently, what logistics were required and how it could be done on an industrial scale. Organised extermination as a result of their ideology. Prior to the war their extremely thorough registration of Jews and part-Jews was unprecedented. The Ukrainians had suffered through the starvation which was due to inefficient collectivization, years of bad harvests and a focus on industrial growth. The workers got what was produced and the peasants got next to nothing. Pure prioritization. Harsh but necassary. So when the Nazis invaded in 1941 the Ukrainians first greeted them as liberators. They quickly learned that the Nazis too needed their grain and other natural resources and they weren't going to ask nicely for permission. Ukrainians were also classified as "eastern people" and as such were marginally above Jews in Nazi propaganda. As for the Jews, the Ukraine had the largest number of Jews after Poland in WW2. Needless to say whoever was part Jew or married to a Jew or friends with Jews or housed Jews were given the same treatment as if they were Jews themselves. So the Ukranians fought for Stalin because at least they had a chance with him, with Hitler they were seen as "mongols" or people indoctrinated with a "Jewish mentality." Uncle Joe did the lion's share in WW2. 80% of all German casualties were on the Eastern Front. Most of their tanks, heavy guns, trucks and logistics were destroyed there. At D-day there were 60 German divisions in France, compared to over 230 German divisions tied up on the Eastern Front. Needless to say an invasion of France would have been impossible without most of the Germans tied up in the East. By this time Nazi Germany had already been on the retreat for over a year and driven back to the borders of Poland. When Romania was invaded in 1944 and switched sides Nazi Germany lost their last source of oil (the Romanian oil fields at Ploesti) and also their most numerous ally in Europe after Italy (which already had surrendered in 1943). The reality is that the western allies needed one dictator to defeat another and they went for the least bad one. Prior to the war Harry S. Truman said:"If Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union go to war it's beneficial to us but if I'd were to pick a winner I sincerily hope it's not Nazi Germany, they mustn't be allowed to win." The first American Lend-Lease to the USSR was signed in March 11th 1941, which was over three months *before* Nazi Germany invaded the USSR on June 22nd 1941. So Roosevelt had already picked a side even before the war started. Besides, the Soviets paid what they got in gold bars which were shipped to the States. Politics aside, yes these are nice looking warbirds. Shame they were designed to kill people. The Polikarpov I-16 was really innovative in the early 30's The first Messerschmitt Bf109 ever shot down (in the Spanish Civil War) was by a I-16. Good evening.
@@wezmarauder2754 You are absolutely right !!! Thank you for such detailed and historically thorough answer ! Those who don't know the history-is doomed to repeat all the horror twice & thrice...
Обидно, что нашу историю сохраняют(в частности самолёты) в основном сохраняют иностранцы, а не мы. Ибо в России днём с огнём не сыщешь летающий самолёт времён ВОВ, а если и найдёшь, то их количество по пальцам сощитать на всю страну.
None of the beautiful aircraft in this video are Russian aircraft. Rather, they are Soviet aircraft developed in the Soviet Union of which Russia was one of many member states. While I don't want to at all diminish the Russian contribution to this, calling them "Russian" totally ignores the very significant non-Russian component. In the case of the AN-2, it could most correctly be called "Soviet" and less correctly "Ukrainian", since Antonov is in Ukraine, and "Russian" would be always wrong.
Как принято говорить у реставраторов - восстановление на деньги заказчика. Бизнес однако выше памяти и гордости. Ну да, конечно, самолёты продолжат вторую жизнь, увы не дома.
За то что поделились историчными самолетами плюс. А за тупое качество видео жирный минус. Мужики вы затрахали снимать авиацию в диком зуме! Хочешь показать самолет вблизи сними его на взлетке! Хочешь показать пилотаж держи горизонт или другой фон в кадре - кому нахер нужен трясущийся кадр нипонятно как летящего самолета?
The i-16 seems to be so much fun, small and open cockpit!!! But the star is the MiG 3, what a look and what a sound, beautiful!!!
Благодарю от всей души, ребят которые восстановили эти легендарные истребители до летного состояния !!!
МиГ-3 шикарен
И-16 просто прелесть
Ан-2 - наше всё
Подписываюсь под каждым словом)))
воистину
Не могу не выпендриться - И-16 и Ан-2 кровные братья, у них один двигатель
La plus belle musique que j' adore entendre c' est le 9 Cylindres de ce splendide Polikarpov I-16, mon préféré! Bien sur le légendaire Mig-3 tout comme l' Antonov An-2!!! Bol'shoye Spasibo pour ce partage
Love that Polikarpov I16. Thanks for posting. God Bless
The last plane sound quite similar to a Merlin engined spitfire! Great video as there seems so few videos of wonderfull Russiian aircraft.
It sounded almost exactly like an Allison engined Warhawk!
Mig 3 wow I never thought I would see one fly today
Cool that someone takes the trouble to keep these great planes airworthy. Best find on RUclips today, thanks!
I-16 : I’m a Killing Machine !!!
Me: Awww that’s cute ❤️😂
I know im asking randomly but does any of you know a trick to log back into an instagram account??
I somehow lost the password. I would appreciate any tips you can offer me
@Alessandro Josue Instablaster :)
Ja, für den Piloten der sie flog.
Ich staune immer wieder wie viele I-16 es noch gibt. Was unsere Luftwaffe von denen in die Erde geschickt hat. Die AN-2 ist eines der schönsten Flugzeuge. Überhaupt die russischen Flugzeuge. Aber auch unsere sehen schön aus.
It did very well in Spain, but was getting obsolete in -41.
Flew in New Zealand's Yak3M at Hood Aerodrome 2 months ago.......STILL buzzing about it!
Also, how did I not know about an airworthy Mig-3?!!!
PS it was us Kiwi's that got all the i-16's Rebuilt.......You're Welcome World.
+ Susan Butler There are three restored Mig-3s, all completed in Russia with Allison V12 engines. (Checking on #3 because I think the Russians were trying to put an original Mikulin V12 in it, unsuccessfully if I recall.)
Now that the Russians have I-153, I-16, Yak-3/9 and MiG-3's flying up again. Its time for them to put together a Lagg-3 and La-5fn back to flying status. Also Il-4 medium bomber would be the icing on the cake and God forbid if I ever get to see a Pe-8 heavy bomber in my lifetime :D
War thunder top
Nice to see the love of aviation crosses all borders :)
I saw Yak 9 in Air show at Travis AFB, it was found by accident in some old factory all disassembled. So it got assembled with the original parts, made in wartime. Its all red in color, so I believe there are more birds with original engines out there
The i16 would be a hoot to fly.Love it very much.
Wonderful, I had no idea any of these were flying!
Apparently there are 3, all utilising Allison V12s. I would love to see one sometime, the MIg-3 is one of the most beautiful aircraft ever made.
It looks like it's going 400mph sat still, and that is a hell of a roll rate.
Nice war birds..rare. Thanx for the video.
Magnifique présentation, bravo !
AN-2 at the start of vid.
The moust impressive thing is that it creator Antonov were largelly crityciced for it development - and it is flying now with almous 70 years of service.
Wow...an airworthy MiG-3! I have seen Yak-3/9's with Allison engines before, they are great performers. I-16's are neat. The engines in the I-16's sound a lot like Wright R-1820 Cyclone.
It's rather funny, but I-16's engine sounds like this, because its engine is Wright R-1820 Cyclone, made in ussr by license, and called M-25.
@@ИМЯФАМИЛИЯ-с3и8ы ну у нас их сильно модифицировали
Nicknamed the Noddy plane with attitude
MiG-3 is the high-speed and high-rise in the world of combat interceptor in 1940.
Миг-3 - самый скоростной и высотный в мире боевой перехватчик в 1940 году.
Был бы Александр Иванович живой,порадовался бы(про МиГ-3)
Yes thank you...not many made and under circumstances of their mission I'm surprised not more were destroyed. It wasn't the best bomber of the war but its a unique one that hardly many know about and it was Russia's attempt at creating their own first real long range bomber in similar dimension if not larger then the B-17. WW2 was Russia's lesson of total warfare and its because of it that Russia is a superpower today!
What plane do you mean ? Both Mig and Polikarpov were frontline fighters, and the AN-2 was designed after the War as a multifunctional airplane but not as bomber.
I didn't know there was an airworthy Mig-3. Thanks for posting. It has agreat rate of roll.
This is not a replicas, it is the aircrafts restored in Novosibirsk, about which a movie filmed in high definition, a link to one series of which I have left above. When testers flew on this MiG-3, they were greatly surprised by its excellent handling, in all historical documents say that the MiG-3 did not have a good handling at low altitudes (this plane is designed as a high-altitude interceptor)! It was the fastest fighter in the beginning of the 2nd World War, at the height of its speed exceeded 600 km / h
They have done a beautiful job on the restoration. I hope one day we will see an La-5 or La-7 in the sky again. there seem to be very few survivors of Lavotchkin's aircraft.
Since you seem to know something about these birds; do you know whether the Mig-3 in the clip still sports its original engine or is it converted to Merlin as most ex-Soviet fighters are these days?
localsheriff 1977 It's got an Allison I'm pretty sure. Most Soviet fighters nowdays use allisons not Merlins.
Миг-3 Превосходил в свое время Мессера по всем параметрам! Высотный перехватчик убийца..Красота.
So much things to see in your country !Let's pray for peace and normal relations with a beautiful people!
Богом Вас прошу.!!!воссоздайте Нашу поршневую авиацию времен СССР.!!!!
Вы возможно не в курсе событий. Практически все самолёты, восстановленные из обломков, проданы за рубеж. Эта новосибирская группа зарабатывет деньги на памяти наших лёчиков, на их крови. Там нет бога.
@@ERK191 Вы возможно не в курсе событий, все работы по реставрации оплачивают буржуи, поскольку СибНИИА, где их восстанавливают сам с трудом выживает. Облетывает самолеты директор института.
Yes, Allison one. But the whole frame original. The craft belonged to Alekseev fighter pilot of 122 fighter regiment shot down in 1941 .
Ahhh! Those Russians. Unique styling based on practicalities.
Thank you very much! These are three very historic airplanes. I want to visit Russia someday, and perhaps attend such airshows.
yes, feel free to use this video as you see fit. i've listed it under creative commons licence.
Yes, it has an Allison V-1710 engine, V-12.
Очень редко можно увидеть в работе...
Интересно,И-16 и МиГ-3 еще когда нибудь летали?За 8 лет больше их не видел.
И 16 круче ВСЕХ конечно же! От ДУШИ говорю ! Прям птичька!
that first plane kinda reminds me of the otter that we used in the north of canada a lot .. it was a very dependable plane .. you could trust that it would take you where ever you wanted to go in the north .. winter or summer .. very tough plane ..
I sure that Mig-3 is running a Allison engine instead of the original Mikulin AM-35 V-12.
Beautiful sounding Mikulin AM-35A
It is not Mikulin. Allison.
Excellent video of some great, rare warbirds.
Looks a formidable fighter, did the famous Ivan kozhedub fly these mig 3s
No.. Kozedud flyed La-5fn
It would sound like a T-28 because the Shvetsov engines were based on the Wright 1820, or these restorations could be using Wright 1820 engines also.
Есть ещё настоящие пилоты!
Спасибо за видео
@DauntlessAviation check antonov's history. his bureau was transferred to ukraine from novosibisk in 1952. an-2 maiden was in 1947.
Thank you for posting
the chap flying the polikarpov i-16 gets hero points for balls ... just look at that speed on landing ... like woow
Great video, it looked like a good airshow... :) :) I'm a modeller and am working on a MiG-3 right now, and hope to build an An-2 later on, and I was wondering if I may use parts of this video to illustrate the REAL aircraft flying and moving in the air, as part of my building reviews?? You will be given FULL CREDIT, of'course, with your channel name on the video clip and a link to your channel in the description. Thanks in advane and hoping for a positive reply.. Rob / BasicModelling
Love those piston engine aircraft! Thank you for the great video!
Thank you very much.. Much appreciated!! :) :)
@mendacha , i heard it has some usa made engine, not the original one.
Миг 3 был высотный истребитель _ перехватчик и показывал хорошие результаты на высоте от 3 тысяч метров.а фашисты на ме-109 проводили бои от 1000 до 3000 м.где миг уступал.
Спасибо за работу!
"Миг-3", это высотный истребитель. Его рабочая высота от 2 700 метров, где ему не было равных. Это перехватчик. Нерадивые командиры истребительных полков, посылали работать в нижние эшелоны. А нерадивые лётчики и там, на высоте, гробили машины. А те, кто побеждал не страхом, а умением, побеждали и на малых высотах.
Благодаря Покрышкину, разработавшему тактику ведения воздушного боя и проведения наземных операций с применением взаимодействия авиации между собой на всех эшелонах высот, и благодаря другим Героям Советского Союза, в том числе других родов войск, была показана возможность бить врага в любых условиях, чем они и заслужили звание Героев.
Малодушие и вредительство, как и выход из боя после отстрела боезапаса, стало более заметным остальным лётчикам, которые освободились из под влияния трусов в полках.
И так везде. Поэтому позже страна предала своих Героев и стали почитать всех погибших и военнопленных не сбежавших из плена, называя их всех героями. А в бою погибает неумеха, как и в жизни, доказывая своими глупыми смертями, что товарищества нет и быть не может, как не может быть Суворовского принципа побеждать. Своими гибелями ещё и делали неадекватными остальных воинов.
А что с народом сейчас происходит и не говорите.
На "И-16"("Ишачок") лётчики летали и кто умел побеждать, потом говорили, что самолёт этот, кто освоил, он потом мог летать на любом легко, мол те, кто утверждает противоположное, они трусы.
"И-16" немцы во время Войны прозвали "Rata"(крыса) за его маневренность.
Факт такой, что налёт у немецких пилотов перед первым боевым выходом был не менее 270 часов налёта в тренировках. А у Советских лётчиков иногда не состовлял и 3 часов в первый год войны. Однако били фашиста и в хвост, и в гриву. Значит было нечто иное, другое знание, которое давали во время Сталина. Это понимание и предают периодически люди в себе. Это понимание закономерностей законов Вселенной по имени Совесть.
The Mig-3 was as good, if not better than many western WW2 fighter aircraft. Luftwaffe pilots were told to treat this fighter with a great deal of respect in combat, many did not and ended up paying the price!
Спасибо 👍
If only they had lengthened the fuselage on the Mig-3, how different things would be.
Может я не понимаю, объясните, пожалуйста: что может видеть перед собой пилот МиГ-3 во время взлета и посадки? Я так понимаю, только задранный капот самолета, взлетной полосы он не видит, то есть, рулит вслепую? Что то может видеть сбоку, высунувшись из кабины, а все остальное, как, наугад?
На посадке все видно, потому что посадка на основное шасси выполняется, потом можно сбоку смотреть, ну и фонарь открыть. На взлете самолёт в начале разгона сбоку смотреть, а потом он на две точки горизонтально выравнивается и все прекрасно видно. Попробуйте игру War Thunder, виртуальный кокпит, там все станет ясно.
@@felarfurlong Да, видимо, для этого надо сесть в кабину самому. Жаль, нет такой возможности.
@felarfurlong probably Allison like in the P40s and early Mustangs
Крылатые красавцы!
The MIG 3 looks like a spitfire fuselage with a hurricane wing. The growl of the Merlin is undisguisable.
I wonder if the mig has an original Mikulin engine..
even the shape say 'speed!'. It was the fastest high altitude plane in its day, faster than bf109 and spit, but germany go low where it mig-3 is ineffective
привет из новосибирска
Поддержу АНку(стоит в п.Луговой Моск обл.по случаю люблю побродить рядом)Насчёт МИГа и сейчас лежит на шкашфу в виде модели.сложная машина так и не могу поднять.Хочет скорость при взлёте и хорошую полосу.не реклама Дмитров кто и где летает
миг не самый лучший по ттх, но самый красивый
капот как у гоночного авто - длиннный
мотор от бомбера
были экспериментальные самолёты на его базе с 2000 сильным АМ-42, они разгонялись до 730
МИГ красавчик,с детства запал в душу
Seems Russia has maintained a good collocation of vintage warbirds and thats really cool.
Not as good as the Germans!!!
Jurgis Kairis?
A real Woman, an oldschool Harley and the I 16; that´s all what you need.
Love the music!
Probably an Allison, like most Yak warbirds have. Certainly sounds like one
The Mig 3 looks like a close copy of an Italian fighter La Mama Mia or something like that.
those planes have a huge landing speed....
I-16's had no flaps so yeah, they were still going like crazy when landing. One of my favourite planes ever. Good vid. :0)
I was fortunate to see an I-16 display at EAA. Would love to see the MiG-3! What is it using for an engine? An original, or was it converted to Allison or Rolls Royce power. I know the Il-2 flying here was converted because parts for the original engine are hard to come by.
MiG powered by Allison
Were the original engines Klimovs? Doesn't really matter what is in it though, the big V-12s all sound great! I wonder if any of the original engines are still capable of being run. I'm surprised there are two Bf-109s flying with the D-B engines. Those must also be next to impossible to find parts for.
The original engines for both the MiG and IL-2 were Mikulins, AM 35 and AM 38 respectively, more powerful than Klimov ones
AFAIK the Mikulin engines were not very reliable and had temperature/cooling problems. So, I guess those who restored the airframes decided to play "safe". But OTOH it might be difficult to get hold of any Mikulin engine anyway. Don´t think there are many complete or "almost complete" suitable left for airworthy restoration ...
Красота
The i-16 was the first plastic model plane I ever built. Very cool looking airplane, bit out dated to fight the bf-109 but still a cool plane for its time.
プロペラ戦闘機に乗って空を飛んでみたいです=3
wow.. would love to see a mig 3 flying in germany
Poor I-16 was born with no dihedral! Seems to have grown out of it though. It sounds like it's stomping its feet on the flyby!
Жаль что не все самолеты того времени в строю.
Это наши деды и прадеды при многих конструктивных недостатках при тяжелейшем положении страны во всех смыслах переломили хребет нацизму. не америка, не британия и уж тем более не франки. СССР колоссальными жертвами тружеников и солдат. При коммунизме. При товарище Сталине. При условии, когда таджик и башкир и татарин и русский был не чурка и не чича и не урус-а все были товарищами. Товарищами, у которых была общая цель и одна идея. Ленин показал, что религия не имеет смысла, социальность и коммунизм работает лучше...Вспомним Украину...Все мы когда то были товарищами...
YOU HAVE TO LIKE THE "RAT"
In Russia it was called "ishachok" - little donkey
Сам ты КРЫСА! Это Ишачек, или Ястребок!!!
@@АлександрАзсъм-з5т ну так-то он прав, немцы его крысой называли.
@@ИМЯФАМИЛИЯ-с3и8ы спасибо за столь ценные сведения, жизнь прожил в авиации, не знал! 😁 😃 😃
@@АлександрАзсъм-з5т я знаю, что вы знаете, я не понял, зачем вы так резко высказались на слова Рея Хансена.
Очень мало самолётов.
sounds like the mig is flying with a merlin engine in it
Almost same body style as P-51 Mustang
mig-3 is older
@@Братецревольвер Nyet comrade,
We do not trust capitalist pigs to copy allied planes from the west!!!
Hi!It`s certainly a clench.
Goode one! cheers
The I-16 sounds like a T-28.
У И-16 брутальный такой звук мотора.
как у харлея, впрочем у них конструкция двигателей схожа
Это особенности записи на микрофон цифровой камеры.
@@УралСедой-я7ы Микрофон передает звук правильно.
Миг-3 это реально аппарат
Mig 3 yes,but with Super Merlin,,engine!
+ Arturas Statkus Allison engine.
Chachacha 😄! Russkiii Aeroplano gutttt! Nastrowje! Chachacha 🥳😄😸!
Класс.
супер zer gut
Me born in Novosibirsk
Politics aside, I really do like the looks and sounds of that Mig and I-16. Its a shame the government they had behind them was equally as tyrannical as the one they were fighting against.
Tom John "shame the government they had behind them was equally as tyrannical as the one they were fighting against." Equally tyrannical? Not even close. Let's let the *Jews* decide which was worse, and the Ukrainians and most of the people in what later became Eastern Europe.
While Stalin certainly was paranoid people died because the system itself was inefficient and a lot of peasants became superfluous when they introduced tractors and other farming machines. If you played a charade and said:"Hurray for Stalin!" they'd let you live. Stalin also wisely focused all efforts on arms manufacturing because he knew they lagged far behind Nazi Germany and if they would be invaded they'd have no arms with which to defend themselves effectively. Hitler himself admitted to the Finnish marshall Mannerheim (and this secret recording by the Finns still exists) on the latter's 75th birthday in 1942 that he (Hitler) had no idea how much arms and arms manufacturing capability the Soviets had. The Nazis did indeed rely on outdated information.
So as despicable as Stalin was he did save his own people. The bottom line is that as hated as he was by the people they at least had a chance for a life with him. Play the charade and hope the old man croaks.
With the Nazis you couldn't play any charade no matter how much you kissed up to them. Ask the Jews - who tried to play it for a while thinking they would be spared. Their very ideology was based on racial biology and how superior people had the right to defeat and exterminate "inferior people". Eugenics was taken to the extreme in Nazi Germany. Look up Lebensplan Ost, which is what the Nazis had in mind for the Poles, Russians, Ukrainians and other "eastern people" once the war was over. Planned genocide on a scale which would have dwarfed the holocaust of Jews. The Nazis had no peer there in all history. They sat down at Wannsee in 1942 and discussed how to exterminate the Jews most efficiently, what logistics were required and how it could be done on an industrial scale. Organised extermination as a result of their ideology. Prior to the war their extremely thorough registration of Jews and part-Jews was unprecedented.
The Ukrainians had suffered through the starvation which was due to inefficient collectivization, years of bad harvests and a focus on industrial growth. The workers got what was produced and the peasants got next to nothing. Pure prioritization. Harsh but necassary.
So when the Nazis invaded in 1941 the Ukrainians first greeted them as liberators. They quickly learned that the Nazis too needed their grain and other natural resources and they weren't going to ask nicely for permission. Ukrainians were also classified as "eastern people" and as such were marginally above Jews in Nazi propaganda. As for the Jews, the Ukraine had the largest number of Jews after Poland in WW2. Needless to say whoever was part Jew or married to a Jew or friends with Jews or housed Jews were given the same treatment as if they were Jews themselves.
So the Ukranians fought for Stalin because at least they had a chance with him, with Hitler they were seen as "mongols" or people indoctrinated with a "Jewish mentality."
Uncle Joe did the lion's share in WW2. 80% of all German casualties were on the Eastern Front. Most of their tanks, heavy guns, trucks and logistics were destroyed there. At D-day there were 60 German divisions in France, compared to over 230 German divisions tied up on the Eastern Front. Needless to say an invasion of France would have been impossible without most of the Germans tied up in the East. By this time Nazi Germany had already been on the retreat for over a year and driven back to the borders of Poland. When Romania was invaded in 1944 and switched sides Nazi Germany lost their last source of oil (the Romanian oil fields at Ploesti) and also their most numerous ally in Europe after Italy (which already had surrendered in 1943).
The reality is that the western allies needed one dictator to defeat another and they went for the least bad one. Prior to the war Harry S. Truman said:"If Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union go to war it's beneficial to us but if I'd were to pick a winner I sincerily hope it's not Nazi Germany, they mustn't be allowed to win."
The first American Lend-Lease to the USSR was signed in March 11th 1941, which was over three months *before* Nazi Germany invaded the USSR on June 22nd 1941. So Roosevelt had already picked a side even before the war started. Besides, the Soviets paid what they got in gold bars which were shipped to the States.
Politics aside, yes these are nice looking warbirds. Shame they were designed to kill people. The Polikarpov I-16 was really innovative in the early 30's The first Messerschmitt Bf109 ever shot down (in the Spanish Civil War) was by a I-16.
Good evening.
Politics aside
goes into politics
@@wezmarauder2754 You are absolutely right !!!
Thank you for such detailed and historically thorough answer !
Those who don't know the history-is doomed to repeat all the horror twice & thrice...
"Politic aside"
Обидно, что нашу историю сохраняют(в частности самолёты) в основном сохраняют иностранцы, а не мы. Ибо в России днём с огнём не сыщешь летающий самолёт времён ВОВ, а если и найдёшь, то их количество по пальцам сощитать на всю страну.
None of the beautiful aircraft in this video are Russian aircraft. Rather, they are Soviet aircraft developed in the Soviet Union of which Russia was one of many member states. While I don't want to at all diminish the Russian contribution to this, calling them "Russian" totally ignores the very significant non-Russian component. In the case of the AN-2, it could most correctly be called "Soviet" and less correctly "Ukrainian", since Antonov is in Ukraine, and "Russian" would be always wrong.
НОВОСИБИРСК восстанавливает самолеты!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Для зарубежных миллионеров на их деньги.
Как принято говорить у реставраторов - восстановление на деньги заказчика. Бизнес однако выше памяти и гордости. Ну да, конечно, самолёты продолжат вторую жизнь, увы не дома.
Ишак Мишу по всем параметрам уступает. А в игре ил2 наоборот как бешенная табуретка крутится.
За то что поделились историчными самолетами плюс. А за тупое качество видео жирный минус. Мужики вы затрахали снимать авиацию в диком зуме! Хочешь показать самолет вблизи сними его на взлетке! Хочешь показать пилотаж держи горизонт или другой фон в кадре - кому нахер нужен трясущийся кадр нипонятно как летящего самолета?
Russian warbirds have an odd coolness about them.
Русская WarBirds имеют нечетное прохладу о них.