Destiny Defends xQc From Aba Preach Video, Debates Redpill Expert
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июл 2024
- Destiny reacts to Aba and Preach's video on xQc's debate w/ Andrew Tate + Destiny debates PlayingWithFireDating
Andrew Tate vs xQc | "Men Dont Have To Protect Their Family... THEY HAVE TO SURVIVE" ► • Andrew Tate vs xQc | "...
▼Follow Destiny▼
►STREAM - www.destiny.gg/bigscreen
►DISCORD - discordapp.com/invite/destiny
►REDDIT - / destiny
►INSTAGRAM - / destiny
►MERCH - shop.destiny.gg/
PlayingWithFireDating
► / playingwithfiredating
Check Out My Amazon: www.amazon.com/shop/destiny
Buy My Merch: shop.destiny.gg/
00:00:00 Teasers / Intro
00:00:29 Aba and Preach react to xQc Andrew Tate debate
00:06:55 xQc needs to answer this question...
00:12:42 Women who start fights and expect their SO to finish it
00:23:21 Destiny debates PlayingWithFireDating
00:33:16 How men signal wealth
00:45:54 People w/ clout don't struggle
00:57:21 Men w/ jobs don't have options
01:07:06 An attractive guy vs fat girl
01:09:50 Is Destiny actually more redpill than the redpill expert?
01:15:25 "These two are married... how insane"
01:26:31 Mia Malkova is the perfect example
#destiny
#xQc
#Aba and preach
![[ GUILTY GEAR STRIVE: DUAL RULERS ] Teaser Trailer](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/e4TDqaE3XAg/mqdefault.jpg)
xQc Asks Destiny For Big Help ►ruclips.net/video/pfNKxBPf-cE/видео.html
xQc Gets Heated w/ Andrew Tate Moderated By Adin Ross And TrainwrecksTV ►ruclips.net/video/M-30vIb7Z9/видео.html
WHAT IF IT'S YOUR CHILD? - Aba Confronts xQc ►ruclips.net/video/PAZyGoUPs7c/видео.html
I would let her go down if she had a flare gun.
About Tulsi, she's never going to be the president of the US. The way she copy pasted Russian propaganda on her social media was staggering. About bio weapon labs etc.
Timestamps are back POG
If someone breaks into my house of course the man goes downstairs to check.
I'm gay though so it would still be hard to decide
Lmao that's gonna be a problem 🤣
As a bisexual man in a gay relationship, I can confirm that both of you should go down. Double the men, double the home-protection.
The bottom stays upstairs while the top confronts the robber. This stuff is common sense. How is the bottom going to defend himself when he can barely walk?
@@ponternal Switches just die then. Based anti-switch bigotry.
2v1 GIGACHAD
As a juicer and dgg enjoyer, this content is bringing me so much joy
Kids see ghosts is my fav kanye album :), you got taste
Boi who tf
@@empiricus2211 well, it’s a Kid Cudi album too.
@@Re-Todd_Howard Kid Cudi is an ant compared to Kanye
@@Kappatalism so cringe, what are you a high school girl who only cares about popularity? Just because Kanye is more popular than Cudi doesn’t mean we ignore that this is a Collab between two famous artists.
"Dating Advice Lesson 1: Don't be so stupid enough that you would pay 250 dollars an hour for dating advice.
Dating Advice Lesson 2: ..."
Especially from someone so clueless that he doesn’t acknowledge that men will smash almost anyone but hold higher standards for proper dating.
This is one of the most basic understandings about dating/sex that exists. This guy is utterly clueless!
Spend that money on improving yourself ( new haircut, trimmed beard, nice set of clothes) and/or your place (nice set of sheets, comfortable mattress)...
Makes all the difference in the world.
Little (often expensive) details
@@ThomasFoolery8 that shows your debasement of your phallic region if you’d have sex with anybody that’s called desperation and nasty work
@@ChristmasLore absolutely. Get a haircut, beard trim, some new outfits, maybe a nice suit jacket or shoes, decent aftershave.
Just a heads up that the title is clickbait/hyperbolic. The bridge is safe, daliban.
Which bridge? The bridge with redpill coach?
@@Daye04 Probably meant with Aba since he is helping out xQc.
@@moneygrab610 Right. So this person doesn't know what "clickbait" means, or this person thinks that just disagreeing with someone means that you can't be friends any more.
Both of which are dissapointing, as I would expect more from a DGGer
@@0doublezero0 honestly, I don't think it is. Both Destiny and Aba are level headed people who can have a mature relationship where disagreeing is fine. I posted that to avoid seeing a hundred bridge burning comments.
@@souloftheworld9810 the title is neither clickbait nor hyperbolic
Apparently Destiny and Aba both forgot what xqc ended up saying in their conversation about who goes downstairs. X said that he has had that situation in his life and that he did step up in the moment. He also mentioned how he's moved 16 times this year, largely due to swatting and harassment issues. He reacted to the question in a personal way, not a hypothetical way. Obviously that's still the wrong answer in the context of the Tate situation as it's not gonna get through to Tate or the viewers, but it's worth understanding his perspective.
Yeah Aba reacted too impulsively, instead understanding was why X actually had that stance. Most people who are talking all big and calling X a coward haven't actually been the types of situations X has experienced.
@@STARK0181 It wasn't impulse. xqc explained that to Aba verbatim during the livestream prior to the video, and then Aba just left that shit on the cutting room floor.
Then why was he saying he wouldn't go down in that moment? Probably because when that situation happened (if it did at all) he didn't actually go down.
@@kebabkebob7808 what?
@@Mountainlion118 what part did you fail to understand? XQC is a coward
It only took 2 days of me begging to get the timestamps back, August you're beyond based i love you
Man as a guy who works and Best Buy. I know it’s not the hottest job but I feel so targeted by destiny’s rhetoric. Lol
cancel him then.
@@surfingbilly9654 why? It’s just an example?
just joking lol :)
There's like 2 sides of the argument... one side seems to prefer logic and the other emotion. Funnily enough, they agree on principle, but when logic goes "there's better ways to protect everyone in the situation" and emotion goes "wow, you refuse to save your loved ones"... this argument's going nowhere.
Edit: I just really needed to add quotation marks.
I’m sure everyone in that argument silently agrees that you should do the most logical thing to prevent anyone from being harmed. However, none of them would say it out loud. I wouldn’t say it out loud. Specifically when you’re talking to females.
The thing I find the most confusing is "the singular gun."
Me an my wife would grab _a plurality of firearms_ and take turns covering each other's advance as we close on the home invader.
We're a *team,* get with it!
@@the_inquisitive_inquisitor she got raep
@@mullisb430 I don't see the point in lying about it, personally. Guess if your just trying to score or some shit that makes sense, but as a general rule, is it not better to be honest with someone who you intend to become long-term partners with? Though it would an extremely rare circumstance in this case, building false expectations for people and not following through is going to damage your relationship 100% of the time.
But the most logical take is understanding that trying to get into the trivial details of a hypothetical in order to avoid answering it straightforwardly is missing the point of a hypothetical entirely. It's like the classic "a monkey with a typewriter & an infinite amount of time will inevitably write a Shakespeare play" if you're sitting there wrestling in your head how a monkey could possibly use a typewriter, much less write a coherent story, you're already misinterpretinf the point of the statement
Destiny reacting to Aba n Preach reacting to Destiny and Aba and X reacting to X and Andrew Tate
I fundamentally reject that it is my responsibility as a man to die for women and children. I may choose to do so, but I will not have it forced upon me. I am not disposable. I am not a sacrifice.
this topic is actually so fucking boring to me, i can't believe how 'shocked' everyone is when you give this as an answer. just seems incredibly virtue signaly
I agree tbh, jus like women shouldn't be forced to have kids even though a lot of women truly believe that it's a women's job to have kids. The idea that our gender tells us how to approach life in any way shape or form is regressive imo.
I like this a lot. Nobody should be taking bullets for anyone, or pretending that they would.
You wouldn't expect (or want) your GF to take a bullet for you, would you? Yet you're supposed to die for her?
That's not romantic it's just misandry.
It is your responsibility as an adult to die for children, not for women.
BUT if she's your wife, or daughter, then it is.
@@emraef Your own wife and child are not the same as a random woman and random child.
You absolutely are responsible to sacrifice yourself for your wife and child, that's part of what it means to be a husband and father, you get in the way of the danger first.
Love Aba, but I wanna see Destiny, Aba, & Preach all together!
I think there is one, check it out
@Ronald Nygma Thank you Ronald, very cool!
@@kareemramzey8870 link
@@the1stmetalhead ruclips.net/video/PAZyGoUPs7c/видео.html
Their experiment ended at how many matches. They should have talked to the dudes and told them you are looking for a long term relationship and see how many stick around.
Exactly what I said under every video about this. Going downstairs makes no logical sense. Block the door, call the cops, hide.
Yeah, but that's not going to impress the redpill audience! You have to roleplay as Rambo!
Banter aside, I said I'd check downstairs mainly because I was treating the hypothetical as "You hear a noise downstairs in the middle of the night" meaning that it might not be a robber. Even if it is, robbers are exponentially less likely to go through with burglary if residents prove beyond reasonable doubt that there's still people in the house.
Of course, that comes with it's own set of risks...
Nothing but playing the video game makes sense. If XQCd died the bank whre he keeps his money has to liqudate 10 million plus inliquid assets. I will trust Bank of America to keep him safe especially in America. I don'tr see this happening very much seems like they do an ok job already!
A few observations on the dating coach:
1) recognized the bias that his clients are rich but when saying money doesn't help ignores the bais that he only gets the people who are struggling. He seems to see the average of his clients as the average of men's dating success.
2) I don't really think his view of the typical path of relationship is right. I don't have any data but it is my hunch that the average is not to fuck before a few dates / proto relationship.
3) I don't think that being lonely is solved by hooking up. I think that's part of the problem here where the Red pill side will say go be high value, fuck lots of girls, and the choose the best one but their entire selection process ignores the more fulfilling path of finding the best friend that you could also fuck. That just leans into their continual complaint about a small number of men collecting lots of women.
Exactly he says he charges $250 an hour so only rich people can afford his services but then says since he sees a lot of rich people struggling then that means that's the norm. This would be like a psychologist saying that most people suffer from mental illness because all of their clients have mental illness.
the average person IS struggling
Reminds me of a study I read a long time ago that said men with intelligent wives live longer and healthier lives and are less likely to suffer from dementia as the age, which really sounds like common sense even without the data to support it. I feel like this would be a very good point to tell to the people buying into the red pill advice that has you chasing hollow people for the wrong reasons.
@@fieldtech_meets_animols The average male you mean
Yeah when he said sex before relationships always I was just like wtf is he on
$300 for coaching yet this guy wonders why he sees only rich people paying for his lessons? LMAO
To his credit he did self-reflect on this mid-conversation
I think he did say "my hourly rate is high so obviously all my clients are well off" I see what you mean though. There is a selection bias going on that the guy doesn't see. I dont think he was wondering why he was seeing only rich people though that's a mischaractization of him.
1. He said 250. 2. He acknowledged due to this he only gets rich ppl.
He was not wondering he was acknowledging.
I feel like wealth is less of a deal maker (because you’ll be seen as shallow for pursuing a rich guy or girl) but more of a deal breaker. Especially in the dating world, compared to the hook up culture.
The fact that I had a blue-collar job and no degree was way more stressful for me than any other factor going on, and I’ve been able to have serious relationships since I started dating around 23 (and even hook up easily before I decided that shit was for me).
How have we had more content out of the drama then we do out of the entire manifesto
Because no one who actually hates Destiny has the ability to go through the manifesto and pick it apart or wants to come argue with him about it. So all it did was preach to people who already agree or further enrage people who don't.
@@grayne86 president sunday did and it was a shitshow, josie also did but she was covered by erudite. Only rose wrist properly gave a critique and pointed out a major flaw in the doc but he agreed with almost everything else. It's still a good document for history preservation imo
@@mdh_masalewale8681 What was the major flaw he found? Idk if I wanna watch his whole video just to find that part lol.
@@mdh_masalewale8681 What was the flaw he found?
@@niclastname TBH it felt more like nitpicking, but he took issue with how Destiny couldn't know _for sure_ that Vaush changed his name to avoid the Poppy drama, stuff like that. Making too strong a statement, as if it were established fact rather than speculation.
You can’t look at couples as they are now, you have to see what they looked like when they started their relationship. People change over time, especially weight.
When he talks about his tinder experiment. He said the 10/10 guy gets 140 matches and the 1/10 girl gets 500. To be fair this isn't as skewed as people think because, at least in the U.S. tinder is 75% male and 25% female. So just with raw numbers you'd already expect the girl to get 3x more matches than the guy. SO everything being equal we would assume that if the guy would get 140 matches in 24 hours on tinder than the girl would get 420 likes. This isn't even accounting the effect that the scarcity of the women on the platform would create
Also very few online interactions result in real life relationships. In one month a girl can match with 50 guys, talk to 10 and only end up meeting 3 of them in real life.
Yeah but let's not throw away the fact that means a 1/10 girl is still doing slightly better than the 10/10 guy
@@Magic4Real312 Yeah because men are the ones talking to and matching with those girls lmao. Like honestly it seems that most of the problem redpill people have with women just end up going back to men
No, you'd assume that a 10/10 guy gets 1/3 as many matches as a 10/10 girl, but way more than a 1/10 girl
Aba's friend says something like "i get it you've never been in a situation like this and you don't know what it's like" but xqc said in the discussion they are referencing that he has been in scenarios like this but doesn't want to give details. I feel like that should've been addressed.
I disagree, being SWATTED is a whole other thing from a regular break-in.
@@the_inquisitive_inquisitor if im remembering correctly someone did break into his home while he was away
@@Axel_2K Okay, point goes to X
The obvious follow-up would be the difference between a break-in while you're away and a break-in while you're home.
@@jovonn8303 Sure, but that's still a whole lot different from being _inside_ when the break-in happens.
Around the 30 min mark w/ Alex when he talks about his clients who make loads of money but get no girls... I've observed this too, but I've come to a different conclusion.
It's as if they figured that because they're well off or even wealthy, that getting that model chick they've always wanted will be a given. They've already been sold and have internalized the idea that wealth = appearing extremely attractive to women. So in large part they have adopted the strategy put forth (get money) and have succeeded in that regard.
But the reality of the situation is, their standards are too high, and their expectations make no sense. They could very likely, easily get into a relationship with an average or even above average looking girl where she'll treat him like a king, but the fact of the matter is that these guys are passing on perhaps hundreds of prospective partners because they don't meet their strict criteria.
So you have these guys who are in the top 20% (at least in the area of finances), but are in the bottom 80 percent in terms of looks and personality, and are probably passing on a lot of great girls. It's almost like the male version of the 6/10 girl swiping only for the top 20% of guys.
I always give these guys the same advice. Give people a chance! They might not be the 10/10 you picture in your head that you really want, but they could really end up surprising you.
There are a lot of unbalanced males out there. Ie. Guys who worked hard in school and have a good paying job but have poor social skills in terms of flirting and being sexually attractive to women.
Money is money. It doesn’t create attraction. It’s just another element to you that can enhance .
Poor ghetto dudes are still having lots of sex with with poor ghetto women.
If you have a solid friend group, meaning you can entertain a woman and show you are fun, women will line up to date you. Problem is for most under 30 guys, so many are socially isolated with hardly any friends, they are BORING as fuck. Internet memes don’t translate into interesting flirtatious banter and meeting a group for an outing or bar for more banter and fun. That’s what women want. “Girls just wanna have fun”
@Alboo333 Or it's very likely that Tate just isn't a pleasant person to be around. lol
Dude, so true about youtube viewers don't like the videos. I even do that too, specifically to D's videos because I just have it in my head that of course I'm still gonna watch more videos so I'm "supporting" by being a constant viewer but likes help a lot more. I like specifically for August, because they're a badass editor.
I may be wrong but I'm sure as a kid we were taught by special presentations in school from the police that if you hear a break in downstairs you should barricade your bedroom door and make as much noise as possible/contact the police
EDIT - im from the UK, this was presented as standard practice for all ages
Yeah as kid. XQC is a grown man 🤣
I got a very different lesson
Namely: how to load a shotgun
I started keeping a pump 20ga in my room when I was like 14
@@the_inquisitive_inquisitor congratulations, your more likely to get shot in your own home than someone without a gun.
No that’s for when a bear breaks in
@@the_inquisitive_inquisitor I grew up in the UK
Holy shit the fucking ladder with the lava lmao. I was dying while this was live.
Ha!
I didn't got what he was trying to do lol
I was robbed at gunpoint…. Being in that situation, I have no idea whether I would jump in front of a bullet for anyone. Probably not being that I froze. And I tried to train my mins what I would do if ppl came in.
If someone was trying to kill someone I loved and I jumped in front of them the gunman would simply keep pulling the trigger.
So you wouldn't protect your child lol
This guy doesn't realize any one desperate enough to pay for coaching who are well off financially are already at the bottom 10% socially. So his "average client" is someone who is way more awkward than the actual average person
He realizes that just fine; he's out here to sell courses and he knows which type of people buy those courses and what they want to hear
Except to be able to make 100k a year you have to have social skills. Social skills in general and making someone want to fuck you are two completely different things. That's kinda like saying someone paying for street smart lessons, don't have any book smarts or smarts in general.
@@MrGreendayzed there are plenty of engineers and IT guys on a lot of money that don't have good social skills. And obviously I'm talking about social skills specifically regarding dating, not just to anyone in the workplace
@@WhopperCheeseDota "plenty of engineers ~ don't have good social" = "the bottom 10% socially." yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah....
@@MrGreendayzed plenty is not majority... what are you implying? Have you gone to uni or college do you know the stereotypical engineering student?
my biggest gripe with the red pill guy is that he used the word "irregardless"
If your girl is a stronger fighter and stays in the room, just tell her the final boss is always strongest.
Lmmmaaaoo 😂😂😂😂
Hahahhaha I love him randomly getting triggered about GOT
Okay so I wasn’t the only one who caught that lmfao 🤣
@@vallreign I imagine most people caught it, it was in the video after all...
''Who's going downstairs?''
Why can't both go downstairs? The more the better right?
SAHARAA
If coherent thought and rational thinking goes out of the window in these situations and instinct takes over, then why do we even have these hypotheticals? How are people in normal situations supposed to think about how they would react in situations where they're not even going to be thinking about how to react? I think this is partially why XQC hesitates, because nobody can possibly know.
I don't think there's a police officer on the planet who would say _"In the event of a home invasion, instead of hiding/evacuating and calling the authorities; you should go downstairs and fistfight the robbers, but only if you're a guy! :DDDD"_
This was never about maximizing safety for either partner, it was about giving the sexiest answer so the 2-3 women listening will find you more attractive. That's it.
@@wisemage0 This feels like a very slippery slope.
BUT YOU GOTTA BE THE MAN BRO
@@wisemage0 the debate was about REAL life and XQC and Desteny showed how far disconnected streamers are from reality. in my opinion they lost big time and they will keep losing debates until they go outside and touch grass sorry to say but XQC and Destiney you do not know what it his to be a normal human anymore just like most streamers living in bubbles.
The thing is this whole U CANT THINK in these situations is bullshit in these situations u might just freeze up and shit urself u can say I WOULD JUMP IN FRONT OF THE GUN or I WOULD GO DOWN STAIRS .100% ur capping harder the gangsters when u front on them furthermore the only reason people have these ideas like I GOTTA TAKE THE BULLET FOR MY WIFE OF CHILD....is because of some idealistic system where wemon can't take care of themselfs due to the past and u can't bring up feminist would want u to protect them...no shit I would want someone to protect me to everyone would and new wave feminism also more about how bad men are
The whole point is you're a team. You don't go out to defend your partner purely because you're a man. You go out there becausw men generally have physical advantages and in that situation, that is what's needed. If your woman can beat you the fuck out then she should be the one going out there. If you have one gun and is a much better shot than you, she should have the gun.
Typically men are stronger, so they get the protector role. That is literally all it is. Using this to generalise women into certain roles in relationships is just stupid.
The fact that the dudes can't imagine a woman being better than a man at shooting... When none of the men shoot... So every woman slanging in gun ranges is just nonexistent? Only something a non-shooter would say.
So In the question of would you go down stairs to protect your woman from like a home invader or something. I actually agree with XQC here. Why the hell would anyone go down stairs do go defend material shit like a blender lmao. It’s tactically one of the most retarded things you can do. Why would anyone think that running it down at the intruder who might have a gun is a good idea. The only reason to go down there is to protect someone who is down there and is caught by the intruder and even then that can be a mistake as well. I feel like Aba and preach look at it from a non realistic perspective. just my opinion though.
Just push her down the stairs and leave through the window man. Now you dont have to be married anymore 👍
I always say there is masculine and feminine traits. Both are more common in their respective gender, but differences between individuals are always greater than between groups. In 9/10 cases the man is more fitted to combat so he should be the protector. But don't forget the 1/10 cases and make the scrawny nerd defend his MMA wife.
@@0doublezero0 Massive difference between martial arts and shooting. You're not gonna kick anyone's head off or grapple them if they shoot you. If anything women have an advantage with shooting because they are smaller and can hide. This is all ignoring the fact that going on a rambo hunt to kill imaginary shooter is ridiculous and unrealistic to anyone who's had a break in.
Aba and Preech my favorite gay couple on youtube. Paved the way for a generation of future youtubers.
Corny
lol
I think a good way to rephrase the question to get xqc to engage would have been to add what if you’re kids are downstairs and someone entered downstairs are you are sticking to that plan or is one of you going to confront and if so who?
Right but it’s sad that you have to create all of these details and get them all right in order to corner him logically to answer the question. He knew what the point of the mental exercise was. He just didn’t want to sound like a coward.
@@ThomasFoolery8 I think Xqc just didn't want to lie and pretend like its an easy choice.
Since he had this actually happen multiple times it seems.
When Destiny him and Aba talked he mentioned that he actually did step up when it was needed.
He is probably just bad at communicating it.
@@gaijinyade that boy is a coward Top G owned him.
@@markjohnson3196 Ok buddy, I have a hard time taking the advice of someone that unironically says shit like "power is everything" and "if you don't have mafia connections why even bother being rich" as serious.
But whatever floats your boat.
@@markjohnson3196 lol top G(roomer)
So a recap for the alex and Destiny bit, would basically be, that their difference in opinion stem almost exclusively from their personal experience.
Not true. Destiny is also citing larger data sets and pop culture trends. Destiny is right let’s face it and I don’t even like the guy.
X is the most right. If I were him I woudl sit there, realize hwo much meony I have in lqiudi assets at BoFA wealth managenmetn and begin to wonder why they would want me dead, since they lose all the money adn have to do the will. Then I would continue to yell at the juicers trying to be stupid. Seems like the option whre he getts nto not pause the game would be hs choice
Ends the intro with “do you know who Mia malkova is?” What a bait lol
Preach saying someone going "idk what I'd do tbh" is being dishonest and the honest ones would say "yeah I'd immediately fight a robber if I had to" lmao the cope
im very confident that i could beat the shit out of women. no matter her height or how qualified she is, Its not debatable.
I dont know if you have training or not but if you don't, you would get destroyed by a professional fighter.
Everything's debatable until it's proven
@@CptVein not really women are soft and squishy. Even trained badass women are still tiny in comparison. There's just no comparing the physical capabilities of men and women. A mediocre man would spike a professional trained woman into the ground the moment he got his hands on her if he felt in any way seriously threatened.
@@christopherwigfall6518 LOL!! You are clueless. Everyone goes down if they get a good hit on the chin. A shot in the nuts hurts even if you have 100 lb over the other person.
Go in a ring with Cyborg and let's see how you fare.
Freaking dumbass....
The entire "who goes downstairs" is just some internet toughguy shit. You can say you would, but you're just saying what you think sounds best. XQC is the only one being honest in this situation as no one else can actually say for sure if they would.
People saying they can beat people up online and telling us how brave and manly they are is something we used to make fun of, can we go back to that?
It's tough guy shit to feel an intrinsic duty to protect your family? I will gladly make fun of people who pretend that the female population actually does not expect provision and protection from the males they select. That's a fact that will never change
Im not sure if you saw the whole argument but the hypothetical was used because xqc kept avoiding the question of as a man do you have an innate responsibility to protect your woman also the orginal hypothetical was You and your girl at home it's night time you hear what sounds like someone breaking In Between the bossy who is going downstairs to check
Idk where you get the tough guy routine from, because Preach ( black tank top) doesn’t do that machismo shit anywhere, as someone who’s watched AnP way before I got into destiny. The conversation is about gender roles.
Say what sounds best? XqC is being honest sure, but just because u can’t imagine someone would legitimately want to risk their body and life to protect a loved one doesn’t mean it wouldn’t and doesn’t happen. No one is saying they would charge into the situation guns blazing and remove the threat no problem like an “Alpha Male”, the whole hypothetical is who would go downstairs to meet the threat and why. I think you missed the point.
Andrew Tate I don’t know shit about though, he does seem a bit like an Internet tough guy. Maybe a more well put together TonkaSaw. Don’t have a strong opinion on him either way.
@@davantebarbain3216 yes, it is internet toughguy shit to talk about how youd totally protect your woman and throw yourself infront of attackers without a second thought.
The issue here isnt the hypothetical, its how useless the question is to the vast majority of people. If you ask anyone if theyd sacrifice themself for a loved one theyre almost guaranteed to say yes, but this clearly isnt true for most people.
This is why i think XQC was being honest, whereas they werent. Everyone thinks and says theyre going to be *that guy* in these situations, but obviously very few are. Saying yes to these situations is never going to be honest unless youve literally been there, but no is far more likely to be.
@@user-es4lp3kp2w the answer is toughguy shit because its self agrandizing with no precedence. Have these guys ever gone downstairs during a robbery? No? Then i have 0 reason to believe you.
Its like someone saying "i'd totally play this song better but i dont have a guitar" in the comments of a cover, it means nothing except you think youre better.
We have no reason to believe you are capable of such things so its just circlejerking
"Remember Kids, Destiny Loves Black People."
I luuh blac peopo
Destiny is a girl's name
@@punchout2418
The kind of girl that grinds in a VIP lounge
@@sergpie he's not that man pal.
Xqc is more interesting than i had assumed. He seems like a legit good person.
You have a weird idea about being a good person...
@@uUuWolf16uUu Care to expand?
@@reubenmcmurray4377 Well, I don't see virtue signalling and grandstanding as a "good person move".
@@uUuWolf16uUu Literally everyone in this conversation is virtue signalling lmao wtf are you talking about
@@uUuWolf16uUu Neither. I think Xqc is being more honest than Tate.
I think Tate is a coward and probably wouldnt die for his family. I think hes the one virtue signalling.
But my comment wasnt actually referring to that. I was surprised by how well Xqc followed the conversation. He actually put a great deal more thought into his answered than i would have assumed.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding. If Tate's car in the analogy is invincible and 10000% cannot be broken into or stolen, I don't see how he can argue that it's "irresponsible" to leave it where people would try. There's no responsibility being neglected if nothing can happen to it. By that logic literally everything you do is "irresponsible", even more so in fact. Leaving the power to your house turned on is _more_ "irresponsible" by his standard, because in his analogy we have perfect knowledge that nothing can happen to the car, whereas in reality we do *not* have perfect knowledge that an appliance/the wiring in your house won't malfunction and start a fire at any time. He just really _really_ doesn't want to admit that the feeling he has is worry/fear, but none of his defenses logically work. Mitigating risk is entire purpose of being territorial. So if he's not worried about the security of his car/relationship, then "territorial" doesn't apply.
Also his whole "territorial" defense is admitting the insecurity. Territorial just means you're extra defensive of your property/territory _for fear of encroachment/what would happen if you don't ward off X Y Z "threats"._ The only purpose of even _being_ territorial is to alleviate the worry that a threat will take your territory or attack/take you or your property. If you had perfect knowledge of the future that your wife would never leave or cheat, then there's 0 purpose to being "territorial" about your wife.
It's not insecurity, it's his philosophy. I don't want you going out to the club, so you won't go. It's a matter of principle. You're the one introducing things like ''insecurity'' or ''worry''.
@@Al-ji4gd Lol yeah everything is simple and easy when you stop after one step 😂
Yes "I don't want you going, so you won't". You have to use more than one brain cell and go another step or two: "Why do I not want you going to the club?" then the why to that answer. You have to go to the foundation, not just the super basic surface layer.
At best the other out from insecurity he could arrive at down at the foundation is "it hurts my feelings".
I got an ad from the daily wire while watching this video lmao.
I think, like with most hypotheticals, it's easy to get caught up in all the specifics and ones own interpretations and personal biases. It's on the onus of the person giving the hypothetical to not only try and isolate any unnecessary variables and keep it simple, but also try and keep those who are engaging with in on track and within the confides of the question you're trying to get at.
Xqc added all kinds of extra to a simple hypothetical though... Literally everyone else understood the hypothetical immediately
Tate built a box around xQc then closed him up in it, with rhetoric basically. That one hypothetical was the final top piece and lock to that box I feel like. X could have climbed out of it with something like "Yeah but see--" swiftly but he just sat there like a doofus.
unfortunately tate's goal isn't to give the best hypothetical, but to come out looking on top. if the way xqc dodges the question looks bad, then he just wants to push him on that rather than reframe the question
xqc is sort of on the right track by not just playing into tate's narrative, and explaining that in the vast majority of real life examples he will prioritize what increases the safety and survival of both rather than doing something less effective because it's the manly or protector role thing to do. but while bringing this all up is important, not simultaneously answering the hypothetical gives tate something to dig into and make him look back.
@@thatgeekygamerguy7664 Ok if Thor breaks into your home with a private army and says you or your wife has to suck him off and swallow who does it? It’s a simple hypothetical answer it or you are beta.
@@solaceinouroblivion2262 Maybe Tate was anticipating xqc to use the nuance in order to in his own head logically come to the conclusion he did, all the while looking bad from Tates perspective. I'm not sure Tate is really that 5Head, OR it could've just luckily worked in his favor. (assuming you have a bias against xqc)
But regardless, it was a poor hypothetical since now from a objective point of view xqc had a reasonable and logical answer because he was allowed to run free with the hypothetical, uncontested by Tate.
Xqc only looks bad if you interpret his final answer without any of his conditioning or reasoning and solely from what you can assume Tate was trying to get at; "do you feel a duty to protect your significant other?"
8:50 I think it’s bit shitty that Aba didn’t bring up that Xqc had been in a situation similar to this when Preach was ranting about X having 0 experience in a fight/flight situation. He knew damn well X had been since they discussed it during their convo but I’m guessing didn’t bring it up to not redeem X’s perspective
Being SWATTED - as shitty and traumatic as that is - isn't really equivalent to having an actual home invader.
It's the Police, they announce themselves before entering and *you are obligated to NOT resist.*
You know* that the police won't harm you as long as you comply and there's a good chance the situation will resolve itself by the end of the night.
If an actual home invader breaks in the only thing you know is that a Stranger has chosen to violate the sanctuary of your home.
* "know" ... they aren't *supposed* to - in a perfect world.
@@the_inquisitive_inquisitor he hasn't only been through swatting. He admitted himself there were breakins. He even mentioned someone breaking in with a hammer looking for him once. Like just cause he doesn't share details doesn't mean they didn't happen.
@@RB-zw6ym if he doesn't share details I don't know WHAT happened and I don't believe _anything._
53:35 that's actually why your " stats" might be very skewed. You coach rich guys , sure but also the whole point of them reaching out to you is because they are struggling. There's probably something else that is wrong there. You're ignoring the dudes that make a lot of money that DONT need to take your coaching. All I'm saying is your " stats" are not as sound as you think they are
I coached pee wee Herman to take a cricket bat to Peopels' shins for money. Ambrien had some dece vivid dream.
More stories about dealing with drunk ppl at the casino plz
This is such a lizard brain thing lol. Like yeah, it's probably a noble thing to rush downstairs and defend your family but that's not always the best or smartest course of action for the situation. You might end up putting your family in more danger by going downstairs and starting a confrontation immediately.
It could be the police busting in with a mistaken address for all you know and then they fill you full of holes because you rushed downstairs in attack mode lol
Literally one of the first things you're taught in a first aid course is to assess the situation before administering aid to anyone and this is pretty similar. If you put yourself in danger and now YOU need saving too, you can't help anybody and you've made the situation objectively worse.
@@telepathyclub They’d probably drown trying to save their wife from drowning. But tbh, for a child I would sacrifice 100%
Touch grass
@@telepathyclub so your saying the intruders won’t go upstairs???? Your acting like staying upstairs isn’t putting you in danger already
The tiktoker that the gymbro mentions around 1:14:14 is a lady who got married to her high school sweetheart. They met in high school and then later got married. He didn't meet her and then lower his standards to marry her. Gym bro seems to imply that they met when she was morbidly obese, when that's not the case.
If you, as a man, are constantly thinking that you will defend your lady wouldnt you eventually pause one day and wonder if going downstairs alone against an unknown threat or trying to fight a group of guys or jumping in front of a bullet are realistically the best options? Or perhaps have you just been watching too many action/horror movies?
We all like to think we are the heroes and we come up with wild or even realistic scenarios of us saving the day when we are bored, but perhaps we should plan out those scenarios a little better while we arent in those scenarios so that if and when we are ever in them we can then maybe remember take a less dumb overly masculine measure.
Genuine question for anyone reading... As someone without really having a father or mother figure to "raise me right" on gender stuff i like to think im fairly onjective and treat people equally regardless of gender(horror for feminists)... if so is it not incredibly cucked to be a man and hold yourself to a standard of sacrifice but not hold the woman to it ? and then not only accept that asymetry but also fight to keep it?
Unless the inherent trade off of relationships is woman gives man care and beauty and he protects and therefore has to accept being expendable to some extent
i think there needs to be a strategy sure. just jumping downstairs and dying might even expose your family to the very threat you tried to avoid. but if its me dying vs my child or wife im definitely choosing me.
sex is like a convo. i would rather have a wonderful interesting conversation with an unattractive woman than an extremely attractive woman that is an idiot. a 5 can go to a 10 with the right personality and vice versa
Not YT chat, but still liking the video regardless.
chat was so stupid they think that being swatted and being robbed in the middle of the night is the same thing. The police aren't trying to kill you and they announce themselves at the door. When you're being robbed in the middle of the night they don't know if they have weapons, how many there are, and/or if they intend hurt you.
IKR
@@Atropos6976 I mean... meth exists
I did not expect Aba to stab xqc in the back like that.
GOD DAMN. 🐍
Yeah I'm questioning my previous notion of Aba being a good dude.
Juice man and destiny content enjoyer.
Honestly, Xqc's take originally was pretty reasonable. Maybe not the "maybe she'll go down there if she's better qualified." If its just you and your partner in the house, both in the same room, you obviously call 911 first and then you avoid conflict for as long as possible. You don't know what the people breaking in have, you don't know how many of them there are. Running in blind is just stupid. Even if there's just one, you don't know if they have a gun. You lock the door to the room, sit quite, and be at the ready for conflict as you wait for the police. It doesn't make sense to give up your strategic position, as well as put both of you in harms way.
Now if you have a kid in the house in a separate room, that is a different story. Best case scenario would be to quickly get the kid and all be in the same room together without the trespasser hearing you. Even as obvious as it might be that the home is occupied, you don't want to let them know you're there or what room you're in. Even if its obvious, they might not think they've been heard and ultimately they have no way of knowing until they've heard or seen you.
Edit: Some are saying its best to announce yourself as well as call the cops. Which I would actually agree is better to do than remain completely silent. However I personally wouldn't announce myself until I know they're going to try and enter the room I'm in.
It's not that his take wasn't reasonable, it's that he wasn't engaging with the hypothetical in the way it was meant to be engaged with. The question was about masculine duty and the hypothetical was supposed to augment that question. Instead of answering the real question, xQc tried to reason his way out of the hypothetical. He was right in the hypothetical, you should not just jump into chaos if it can be avoided; but he didn't answer the question they were getting at
the issue is that despite his opinion being fine, by not simultaneously answering to the original purpose of the hypothetical, it gives tate something to dig into. you kind of have to answer the original point while also saying why in reality it works out far more how he says it does than in the hypothetical.
@@jovonn8303 True, the problem is you just don't know 100% the person's intentions. I agree, the average person doesn't want to kill anyone. People breaking in to steal shit don't want conflict just as much as you. Especially if they're breaking into a low income house, getting caught in that case isn't worth it.
But ultimately, I don't know the person's intentions or just how far they're willing to go. I personally wouldn't want to take that chance and reveal myself. Maybe at the point where they're trying to break into the room we're in I'd give a warning and tell them the cops are on the way.
@@VexillariusMusicEDM Then they proposed a bad hypothetical. Or one that actually contradicts their argument. Confronting a break in isn't masculine, its just stupid.
Now maybe the better hypothetical was the "if you saw your girl getting raped by a big dude or two dudes, would you fight them to stop it." Even that is a flawed hypothetical though, because it actually has literally nothing to do with being "masculine." Would a woman not try to do the same? Anyone would try to stop harm being done to someone they know. Xqc's answer might have been a bit bad faith, but essentially what he said is "well I'm fucked then, cause I can't fight for shit." Which you can argue is somewhat dodging the question, I'd agree he was avoiding answering a lot of questions.
But honestly I don't entirely blame him. Cause especially with someone like Andrew Tate, if you give the answer they're looking for they're going to run with it. He needed to point out the flaws in their questions first before answering, but I don't think he knew how to put the flaws into words.
Step 1: Grab your loved ones while your girl calls the police
Step 2: get your gun take up a position where you have clear view of the stairs
Step 3: announce your presence, that you have called the police and that you are armed and prepared to defend your family.
Step 4: wait and be prepared to fire.
Merely hiding in a room is dangerous as fuck what you gonna do when they corner your ass and have every single advantage? Your typical robber is after valuables and where is the jewelry usually kept? Thats right in the bed room. Which is upstairs. where you are hiding.
If you dont have a gun you absolutely should get one and get training on how to use it.
I get what Destiny is trying to pass here 48:30 . Men get caught up in the 6 foot stuff , when 5 9 to 5 12 is very unlikely a no , but for the real short dudes like 5 2 , 5 4 this is most certainly the biggest turn down
If it was true, men would rejoice if height was just a male driven thing.
As someone who has known short dudes 5’2 etc that pull no problem. I believe he is mostly right.
These dudes all had something about them. High school/college age - smart, outgoing, danced, etc.
Older workplace - bosses, work in interesting fields, take care of themselves physically.
A lot of women will 100% reject solely off height, but I believe most women will “settle” as long as the person is taller than them.
I’m 5’7 and it has never been something the girls I’m interested in (typically shorter than me) have ever minded (not on Tinder that is).
Women will literally laugh at a man behind their backs if they are short. It's pretty brutal.
@@kangaroomax8198 you may be right with some women doing that, but it isn’t a common thing from the type of women I interact with. Sure they want a taller man, but as long as you are taller than them they are usually fine with whatever height you are.
In my experience most girls just want a guy who is taller than they are. The ones who insist on 6+ feet are usually tall themselves so they need 6+ feet to achieve that, or they're shallow and picky.
Men who are like 5'0"-5'3" may struggle but there are still enough girls out there who don't care about height that they can find someone. They just have to look harder and make sure they're cool dudes.
Has Destiny ever talked to preach? Just wondering, I've seen a few talks with aba.
Preach has young kids and stuff, I don't think he is online as much as Aba.
Always better to choose average looks with good sexual connection than a super attractive person that is inexperienced or is just there doing nothing
Pulling a hot girl even if she can't fuck is better for the ego/confidence though, especially if you pull her at a bar with the boys looking on. Pulling a mid girl who can fuck is just better for the sexual experience. I think it depends what you're looking for.
Even if your girl is robocop, a guy will chose to go down stairs if there is a sense of danger like this can’t be twisted into an extreme take
Listen, if my girl is RoboCop. She can go downstairs. Cuz I'm not getting stabbed, while my ass is stuck in a marriage fucking essentially a brain stem attached to a Cadillac.
Why tf would anyone choose to live in Romania? Sus af.
Romania is poor so being remotely rich, you can live a really good life. Plus, easy to pick up poor girls like I assume tate does
@Alboo333 if that's true, then he's a scumbag
this discourse is really annoying to me. im 18 and don't have a kid, so how am i meant to answer the question of what i'd do if a gun was pointed at my kid? i can't do that honestly cuz i've never experienced what it's like to value something more than my life. i feel like X might have been on this train of thought too so it's annoying seeing everyone say how dishonest or morally bad X was for not answering with a yes instantly just cuz that's the answer most people will give.
I mean you have a family right? A mother and father? Unless you have a particularly bad experience you can insert or apply using them as an example. I feel bad for you if you're 18 and haven't put something above your own life by now. But i don't fully blame you because of the times we live in.
@@edwardedward842 i have nice parents but i have no connection to them really, they broke up early and since i was already quiet never really talked to me. so maybe im missing out on some big connection there that would make me side with preach, but for me i couldnt be honest if i said yes. Sorry for the pity bait at the start, i need therapy.
@@drballsofficial I agreed with preach in principle. You always answer "yes" to that question. It turns women off if you say no. But really if you're not attached to people you're not going to jump in front of the bullet.
@@edwardedward842 Okay, you can "feel bad" as much as you want; but once you swap out children for parents the hypothetical falls apart on every level. Why would a 16 year old be expected to take a bullet for a 40 year old? The older person has less life left to live.
At this point you're engaging in the same type of alpha-male posturing that I'm assuming you'd normally make fun of. Just like Preach was.
M_VG in the chat really reading my thoughts: "Is there really no new content Painstiny"
OK but if you HAD to go down stairs Who's GOING?!
To be faire "no one is going down the stairs" is a valide response
100% valid response. Assuming my family is upstairs sleeping, there’s nothing downstairs worth risking my life over. I’m not taking a bullet for my Xbox
No it isn't, because "tactics" aren't the heart of the hypothetical. The hypothetical is clearly asking do you have a duty to protect your significant other as a man. Idk why xqc or anyone else needs to keep adding things into the hypothetical making it about tactics, when literally all it is asking is if you have a duty to protect.
@@haus119 I think that's the hypothetical's fault. Because it isn't clear that in that hypothetical going down would protect anybody. Not every hypothetical is well given.
@@unikracoon1913 how is it not obvious what Tate is trying to get at with the hypothetical, especially after he rephrased it and literally just said "do you have a duty to protect your woman?". What seems more likely in the context of their conversation, that Tate is asking do you have a duty to protect, or what are the perfect tactics you need to have in order to survive a home invasion?
@@haus119 because if there is an intruder the right thing to do is to stay in the bedroom and call the police. Going down is the wrong thing to do which makes the hypothetical bad.
Good point, Destiny. Not that there is anything necessarily wrong with personally wanting to fulfill gender roles, but sometimes people end up going crazy in the opposite direction of someone like xQc. For example, when Preach said his partner is a third-degree black belt and he would still be the one to go downstairs. Maybe he is an expert fighter with belts as well, I am not sure. But if a woman is a better fighter and is willing, let us not get in the way of more competent individuals just because of their chromosomes.
A woman being a black belt means nothing to raw power a man has especially not know how many people are there, if they're armed, etc. It's why a damn shotgun is one of the best home defense tools. Why punch when there's buckshot
You are wrong. It is not a matter of reason but of emotion and her skill is irrelevant. You should not be willing to risk her getting hurt. It isn’t going the other way either you just don’t understand their perspective.
Preach is also a martial artist he just doesnt have the tecnical accolades his partner does but make no mistake if she doesnt knock him out in one hit he would maul her into oblivion in a all out fight id bet my money on a man winning 999/1000 that isnt to say women are always weaker than men but their capacity for absolute violence is just not on par and their ability to take a hit and keep going is definately not even close.
The point is that even though she may be a black belt, he could whoop her ass cus he's bigger and stronger, so there's no reason she should go down instead.
Preach is trained and he has also been in quite a few life or death situations, so I believe that is why he would 100% be the one to handle the situation. His wife would go handle the children and he would handle the intruder. Without knowing that information it does seem like machismo to some degree, but when you know that it makes sense to me and probably why Aba didn’t think anything of it either.
Listen to his Machete story to understand his willingness to defend his family. Life’s hard in some places.
"women are beautiful *CREATURES* " -titi
Even tho I agree tate has shit views on women, I don't think he meant it in a derogatory way xD I think it's more like "we're all creatures" kind of thing.
I just don’t understand dudes who feel the need to listen to hours and hours of dudes who are compensating for something tell other dudes how to live their lives. Something beyond a woman or love is missing in their lives. Perspective, maybe.
@Alboo333 I don’t think most men in America view women as property, but I do think that the ultra-privatization and obsession with property in the US leads more men to adopt this mindset. Also religion. The puritanical thread runs deep in this country, our exquisite porn industry notwithstanding (then again, Americans aren’t as into fisting and pissing videos as much as Germans are lol).
@Alboo333 I think it does vary from culture to culture, in the U.K I would say clubs are more viewed mainly as a place to meet someone to have sex with. If it is a birthday or something sometimes girls will go out just do dance and have drinks etc, but 99.99% of guys in clubs are looking for sex.
However I agree, saying your girlfriend can't go clubbing but you can, is insane. The way I see it, is that we are all addicted to sex, so if you are in a committed relationship why would you put yourself in an environment, where you may be tempted whilst drunk.
It's like if you were addicted to alcohol, and had given it up, you probably wouldn't, and shouldn't go to a nightclub. I never go to nightclubs ever when I'm in a relationship, and I don't even have the urge or want etc to go to them when I'm in a relationship.
We are all capable of cheating, but if you make a real effort to not put yourself in a situation where you could cheat, you're a lot less likely too, and if you have good morals, if you don't put yourself in those possible spur of the moment situations, you just don't end up cheating. And I also feel it's just respectful to not do that to your partner, if you want to go have a drink and a dance etc, you should be going together, personally I do think it's actually quite strange to go without them even if it is for a friends birthday, male or female. You could all go out to dinner instead, or just let their single friends go with them.
@Alboo333 in the US you tell a guy no and be surprised an hour later to notice he’s tryna get up behind you and dance with you 😂
@Alboo333 it's because of the view that the club goes to cheating on either side. A strange thing is that you are less likely to be cheated on in a strip club then a regular club
What’s dating like in Germany? Do girls care about how much u make?
I love the JLP impression at the start shit kills me every time
Destiny would let Mel go downstairs
i can't be the only one that just enjoys watching the gameplay
That debate took a toll on me. One would make a good point and change my thoughts than the other would make a good point. Playing fkin seesaw
Also, how is destiny more red pill that this bloke.
I agree most those twitch coaches are a scam, but there are plenty of NBA coaches who never played competitive basketball for example. So I don't think you need to be personally proficient at what you teach, theory counts for something.
Idk how privileged you really are at 29:30. Having sex with a boring hottie is a really draining experience. I would so much rather hook up with a plain Jane who understands that she needs to participate.
Lotta people happy just to be getting laid.
I figured it out!
Professional reporter is when the camera is set up in such a way that entrance to the studio is in front of the reporter, so he can keep focusing on the audience without worrying about his surroundings.
Streamer is when the camera is set up in such a way that the entrance to the studio is behind the streamer, so he has no fucking idea what's happening there and has to keep looking back.
1:04:55 --- It's weird how both of them automatically equate overweightness as ugliness. To them... sure. But there are tons of dudes into that. Just watch some current mainstream rap videos. A whole bunch of overweight THICC girls in them. And that's great... again, for them. Attractiveness is always subjective.
Nah in general terms people have an standart of what is atractive
3:08 Black Belt girls can get overpowered by an average man. No, the average man isn't going to beat her in a Martial Arts tournament but just to purely overpower someone with mass or strength is vastly different from competing in a martial art.
That's why we have rules and regulations in martial arts.. and you know... weight classes and separated by sex...
He said that she would technically be better than him in that situation but he would still be the one going downstairs
@@henrygore2177 So, you just actually don't understand anything you hear, you just repeat them. Because that makes no sense, buddy. If she can get overpowered more easily than me she isn't 'technically' better.
If there was a surprise martial arts tournament downstairs; she would be technically better.
@@arj6571 he's quoting the guy. You clearly weren't listening
@@warrenbuffet6126 because that’s always a huge possibility??? Even if not a fist fight it can ALWAYS get physical are you dumb?
Xqc is like 6”4 weighs 120 lbs and his girl is 5”11 weighs like 190 lbs. Do you really think an untrained featherweight man would beat a black belt bbj female at cruiser weight? If not then that means xqcs girl stands the better chance. Also why is this even an argument. Andrew Tate would never go downstairs, he would hide in the bathtub pissing himself while his hired REAL MEN protect his family. Imagine acting alpha when you hired real men because you weren’t enough of a man to protect your own family 🤣
x has gone through alot of shit this last year, its sad that people dont care about peoples mental problems and think everyone should be perfect. like its sad seeing the clips of xqc's sleeping problems. i cant even imagine how scary it is to be swatted as much as he has been
So because he has mental health issues people should not call him out when he spout dumb shit??
Why should you take into account their mental health if they have a bad argument? Should I be disingenuous just to spare their feelings? If their mental health is all that bad off, then they probably shouldn't be engaging in political/logical discussion
@@CornPopWasABadDude no the point is that preach made massively incorrect and dismissive assumptions about x's experience with home invasion/dangerous confrontation, and used his own assumption of x's background to attack his argument
I'm not failing to take his mental health into account, that's a major consideration in saying "he's not the one to be debating these topics"
@@slampey Okay, but it was still a bad argument.
This dude lives in a completely different reality than me
Miami is a unique place for sure.
Damn that title is pretty radicalizing
My ex was a black belt in karate, I used to box and did some catch-wrestling when I was younger and I'm way bigger and stronger. I could throw her around like a ragdoll regardless of her black belt, I'm going down stairs XD. Preach was making this kind of a point, I think.
Karate is also lame tho. I think there'd be more of a difference if she was a BJJ black belt or something
Well the thing is.. YOUR MORE QUALIFIED. Preach was saying his girlfriend was more qualified than him but he would still go down.
Preach is making it a masculine argument. Your making a qualified argument
Karate is dogshit though. Black belt in ju jutsu is a whole other thing.
I'm just imagining me being married to someone like Ronda Rousey and being like nah baby I protect you when I'm pretty sure she can kick my ass. Oh boy is making a completely masculine and argument. I'm the man I should protect you kind of a thing.
@@supergamergrill7734 well even if she’s more qualified to take care of the situation, I would never put my girl in a situation where She could possibly die. How do you explain to her father that you were hiding in the closet while she took care of the threat lol
1:19:28 Holy shit, this is so true and i've been thinking about the same thing for a while... Such a good and insightful video, Destiny.
so wildebeest is now a word that I use, thanks guys.
0:21 why is that so funny 💀
Is this what virtue signaling looks like for the alpha male group… if you don’t immediately say something(doesn’t matter if you’d actually do it) you’re bad, you have to virtue signal that yeah I’d defend
No the delay in answering is what makes it look bad...
@@ErnestStewart The highest rate of survival is to barricade, contact cops and make as much noise as possible. Going downstairs is a Neanderthal sub 50 iQ move. Even if you have a gun and are upstairs you secure a shooting position at a doorway or staircase to have the advantage when the perpetrator emerges. If your home got broken into and you run down stairs you are getting gunned down. The real answer is “ my name is Andrew Tate and I’m a little bitch. I hire real men to protect my family because I can’t, my hired bodyguards are going downstairs while I piss my pants and hide in the bathtub”.
@@ErnestStewart the delay in answering is indicative of a different mindset. XQC has a different point of view that is not typical and you can see this from his lack of hesitation when it came to "nobody goes downstairs". He answers a hypothetical with a very pragmatic approach and it would be interesting to see how far he goes in his analysis. So let's say somebody threatens your kid with a gun but your wife offers to give the guy a blowjob to leave you all alone...do you charge the guy or do you let your wife do the deed and you all get to live? :D I have an inkling XQC would answer yes to this scenario happening.
I actually think XQC was being more genuine than 99% of people who say they would take a bullet for their family, who you then read up on them cheating/suiciding/abusing their own family meaning that their answer was 100% bs.
I get Preach's point about that, but the part I massively disagree with is his claim that it makes xqc look intellectually dishonest. Surely instantly giving the default answer which is obviously what women want to hear, is FAR more likely to be a dishonest answer than the answer that immediately makes you look worse but could be more logical.
@@ErnestStewart yeah it’s a virtue signal… that’s what I said
I think this guy and to a lesser extent Destiny too are much in the entertainment industry bubble. I can't imagine a normal Yuppie woman that is not in that industry caring about cloud.
I think clout can be mapped to “popularity” in the regular world. It matters but it won’t matter until you’re like blue check mark famous. That’s what they mean by clout.
The Feynman Razor
Complexity and jargon are used to mask a lack of deep understanding.
If you can’t explain it to a 5-year-old, you don’t really understand it.
If someone uses a lot of complexity and jargon to explain something, they probably don’t understand it.
Are people using the gigachad emote ironically now? If so, thank god.
Destiny more red pilled than the dating coach was not the angle I was expecting
Crazy. The "coach" full of contradictions. Shame
Literally he was right over destiny on most things and if you can’t see that you either get no hoes, you are under 5’8, or your bx is ugly.
@@zambot264 Can you give me one example of a contradiction?
What did we (validly) criticize Kyle Rittenhouse for?
Going off on his own. Being separated from his pack.
In the home invasion hypothetical, you gather your ppl, you contact law enforcement, and you announce to your intruders that they should flee if they value their lives
And my life partner, no matter what gender no matter what anything, should cover my 6
While I cover theirs
I agree so damn much, I understand that there's kind of an instinct to protect the weaker. But in our day and age, where there's weapons involved and the weaker gender is able to change the outcome of the interaction. There's no valid reason why the man should be the only one to be in danger for his family, unless you see men as disposable and that women have more value than men just because of their gender.
Tell me you don't know anything about home invasions without telling me you don't know anything about home invasions.
Pushed the liked button because you said it Destiny lol. Otherwise, I wouldn't have bothered.
In that viral TikTok with that couple, she stated that they dated when they were 15, so Destiny was right.
The worst thing about Tate by far is that accent
12:02 “because at the end of the day they do sound more sensible” what just doing shit without thinking is less sensible
All these people over 20 years old still talking about clout is mind numbing to me
they're not even in their 20s lmao, they're 30-something-year-olds speaking like prepubescent boys
@@karku3fan It can't be healthy for streamers in their 30s to live like 17 year olds their entire lives
Why is the bar for the average man to have a harem of women who are 10s around him that he can pick from? If you are average - you attract and get average. I feel like people are way over valuing themselves these days.
Mansplaining!
Even if the girl is better trained see how fast she leaves your ass if you leave it up to her to protect you. If you go on a date with a girl that makes more money than you, who do you think pays for the first date? There is this idea world that people want to live in where there are no bad people, everyone is equal, there is no racism, no sexism, ETC. Then there is the real world.
If the man is a scrawny little boy with no muscle at all and stays inside 300 days of the year while the girl has been in a lot of fights while training in mma and she refuses to protect the family simply because of a man's 'masculine responsibility', watch how fast he leaves the girl as well. Who the fuck cares more about their girl leaving them than actually catching bullets just because of the way it looks or the way it's 'supposed to be'?
Destiny, have you never acted irrationally because of your masculinity?
What masculinity?
Destiny doesn't have a masculine bone in his body 🤣. If he did, he wouldn't be left leaning 🤣
@@gabemord5088 You’re confusing masculinity with willingness to commit violence. Being able to be honest and being secure and comfortable with yourself is a more admirable and masculine trait to me. I can fuck up 99.9% of dudes in a physical confrontation. Being able to just be like “yeah okay, I’m a pussy” and go on with your day takes more bravery and confidence than just knocking their teeth out.
@@gabemord5088 He’s financially conservative, but isn’t religious and believes that you should strive to be nice to people and that everyone deserves a fair shake. That makes him intelligent, not a pussy…
@@Dr.DixieRekt why do you think I believe Destiny isn't masculine?
4:40 where is it established that Barn can see the future? I must have completely missed that part. He sees the past and present.