Canon C80 Vs Sony Fx6 (Ultimate Cinema Camera Review)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- The Canon C80 is here, and it's got a whole lot of new features, a whole new sensor and is on a whole new level compared to the C70. The C80 is the first camera I've used that had the chance of taking the crown for best affordable cine camera on the market from Sony and their Fx6. So in this video I'm going to talk about the pros and cons of the c80 all the things that make it great, and wether or not it beats the Fx6. Check it out!
Canon c80: www.bhphotovid...
Sony Fx6: amzn.to/3CFzrfE
Check out my free filmmaking masterclass here: • How to make a Feature ...
The full Filmmaking Masterclass with over 2.5 hours of content is also available the Promo Code ‘DOCMASTER75’ for 75% off:
guy-pigden-s-s...
NEED HELP WITH YOUR FILM? Tips advice guidance on any aspect of filmmaking - Book a one on one consultation with me:
superpeer.com/...
I colour grade using Dehancer, use my promo code - SAVAGEFILMMAKER for 10% off
www.dehancer.c...
All Filmmaking equipment I use and discuss in my videos available here:
kit.co/Savage_...
I use Audiio, use my link and sign up to receive 70% off your first year!
audiio.com/par...
Get the Panasonic s5 Rigid Pro here: rigid.pro/prod...
I use Artlist music subscription for all my RUclips content, films and corporate work, use this link to get 2 extra months for free! bit.ly/3d7AuoR
Or support me for free by watching my feature film 'Older' here:
Tubi link: tubitv.com/mov...
Amazon link: amzn.to/3hySWZ9
Watch my new web series 'Immi the Vegan' here:
Amazon link: amzn.to/3qOMKyv
Tubi Link: bit.ly/3xjTed1
A huge thank you to @Nocturnal3D who was responsible for the editing and VFX in this video. Thanks to / itsrichardlambeth for the amazing performance as Mr Smith and Isaac Newcombe @isaacnz (on Instagram) for the cinematography.
Want to help me make more of these videos? Consider buying me a beer: www.buymeacoff...
Check out my alternate Filmmaking channel: bit.ly/Pigville...
LINKS USED IN THE DESCRIPTION ARE AFFILIATE LINKS
By using the affiliate links I earn a small fee from your purchase, it does not cost you anything extra to use them. They help me to be able to create more videos for you. Thank you for the support! 
Кино
Fun comparison. Unfortunately theres no camera manufacturer that's putting out anything thats SO much better than another brand, that makes it worth switching platforms. If you're a sony shooter, switching to canon, or vice versa, is not worth any extra squeeze. I mean even the best pros can't tell a difference between an fx3 and an $80k Arri in a blind test. Still fun talking about though 🙂
Very good point.
Actually someone did that test. And they could not. 😂
everyone can tell the difference between an arri and an fx3
I think the gripe about the form factor isn't totally fair. building the c80 up with monitors and what not isn't really what it's meant for. The c80 thrives with how it was designed to be used, minimal build. Built in screen, B cam to its proper cinema camera brother, the c400. The c400 is the camera to build on and is a proper comparison to the fx6
If used for a B-cam, no build out, it's a great camera. But the C400 is a much higher price point, to me C80 is Canon's Fx6. C400 is their Fx9 or even Burano. But for my budget I'd want this to be my A-cam.
Great comparison. Appreciate your straight shooter approach. This was one of the best YT vids I've seen in awhile and it helped me verbalize why I was having such a hard time shooting handheld with my c70's form factor...
Thanks! And yes it was ultimately why I ended up selling my c70. Great camera, bad shape.
@@thesavagefilmmaker Yeah, the image is really special on the c70 but not the form factor. BTW I actually think the fx6 image looks better in your tests than the c80. The c80 images look a bit washed out and digital...
I wish they would have kept to the c100mkii body style. Because used prices on the c70 are so good, I still may pick one up. I just hate the body style.
Great points about the body style comparison. I like the image that Canon produces, but the form factor of both the C70 and C80 are too difficult to rig in a functional way. And esthetically they are unattractive to me. I have an FX3 and A7S3 and both are easier to rig with a cage and accessories, and there are a ton of fully functional rigging options to be found that also look and feel great when filming. But as far as the cinema camera body vs. hybrid issue, I also agree with you. As a result I purchased a BM Pyxis, and I am thoroughly pleased with the build and image that it produces. And all 3 of my cameras provide me with an open selection of lenses that I can pick and choose from. The E mount and L mount both leave me with a ton of options.
Hell yeah!
Aesthetics of a camera are irrelevant. And rigging out with excessive accoutrements is unnecessary. All that matters is the image a camera produces and the skill of the cinematographer. We’re blessed/spoiled to be living in a time where all these cameras are better/more affordable than anyone could have dreamt of 20 years ago.
C70 body design was one major point for me to get to Canon. If you need to film unrigged for unintrusive documentary this form factor beats all box style cams. It simply depends on your production style.
Absolutely, completely un-rigged works great… not as well as a Fx6 unrigged…. But close 🤣
You will be missing any audio input on the fx-6 when unrigged. Total bummer for me. But well, that’s just me :)
2:12 I may be in the minority here, but I still think the C70 looks better than both FX6 and C80. It has a soft filmic look to it. If a deal comes around, that may still be a great option for film makers.
This is something I didn't get to, but you could certainly make that argument, I think the c70 softness is one of its strengths. Just means you can't really punch in, should you need to.
@@thesavagefilmmaker 9:37 I watched your short a few times already, very nice work.
Nice colors, great pacing and story telling, good acting as well.
Every camera has its shortcomings. After watching your video, I went to the site of my rental shop. C70 packages are reasonably priced. Makes it easy to rent lights etc..
Yup, you’re in the minority. The c70 is a noise machine lol
@yupthereitism that’s impossible
@@shueibdahir try using one
I love this video… Finally someone created a long awaited video with a good debate
Let the debates begin!
I’m a an fx3 owner and I still prefer the c70/c80 image, just can’t get myself to switch
Yep, I totally agree. It's the other problems that hold back returning to the Canon eco system.
Even harder to get clients to switch.
@@frankfeng2701 Really? What clients prefer Sony? I live in Cincinnati, Ohio. My current list that’s keeping me afloat is Hard Rock Casino, Paycor, Mercy Health and Cincinnati Business Courier. None of them ever preferred or asked for a specific Camera system. I’m currently working with Dooley Creative and they never mentioned what camera system I was using for a jewelry branded shoot. They’ve seen my work, they know the client list. Our first meeting was going over the creative stack which never mentioned camera systems. I got to work as a Grip in the summer for a proper commercial shoot. That director did want the ARRI Cooke look and specifically wanted it in the rental package.
To say there’s less lenses available for the c80 is madness considering the decades of EF lenses that are natively compatible.
EF lenses aren’t native, they require an adapter, and theyre not going to provide the same snappy responsive autofocus as native RF mount glass. And that means the autofocus won’t come close to Sony e mount glass. Which I’m clear to point out. I have a lot of EF glass but it’s not going to provide the same responsiveness. Canon need to change their whole perspective if they want to compete with Sony on lenses.
@@thesavagefilmmaker They already lead the lens race with Sony playing catchup. See the 28-70 f2, 100-300 2.8, 24-105 2.8, etc. There are no gaps in Canon's lens lineup now, along with having the best autofocus and image stabilization now with the c400/c80/r1 era.
Sony led the industry for a good 5-6 years but now they have to punch back or Canon will be taking the lead.
@darkroomzen not unless they make the prices of those lenses more reasonable.
Right... even sony bodies uses adapted canon lens hahaha
C80 allows Cinema Raw lite recording in 12 bit internally. FX6 provides 422 10 bit but nothing higher. To me this gives the C80 an edge.
I did in fact say exactly that. 👌😄❤
2nd base ISO is 12.800 not 128000
Did you mean ISO 12,800 instead of 128,000?
Yes.
If you purchased a camera today for a solo creator who short films, doc work, and travel content, would you choose a Sony Fx3, Canon R5 mark2, or Sony zve-1 any other suggestions? Keep up the good work
Out of those FX3 hands down
I would get the Fx3. Although I do actually like the a7IV image more. Fx3 has a couple extra handy features like 120fps slo mo and super low light shooting option.
Can't go wrong with FX3, with its no overheating, compact size, AF, lens selection, and accessory ecosystem.
I would agree with Johnny about the FX3 in the cameras you mentioned.But if you have a higher budget then either the FX3 or the C400. I have the R5 C, and it's great but for doc work an FX3 or C400 would be the best two choices. (I say this because I just shot a doc with the R5C and while the image was great and I had no issues with my monitor or battery using my V-Mount rig, the issue was for me the audio, you HAVE to buy a tascam to effectively capture audio on a doc shoot with that camera) and the same would be the case for the R5 MKII and the other hybrid sony cams.
The FX3 and C400 you don't have that issue, plus that cinema body is just better for rigging for that type of production to me, so FX3 hands down with the cams you mentioned, and if your budget is higher the C400
you were doing so well...better image, more codecs choices/shooting options, more convenient audio option, onboard RAW and more, I'd say all of that trumps the shape of the body...you were able to make a very nice short so you obviously found a way around what you consider shortcomings. that's not the same shape as Blackmagic camera!
Give me a c80 in a c400's body and I'm absolutely on board. But we never solved the affordable lens shortcoming issue either.
@@thesavagefilmmaker when you're a pro like yourself, buying a overpriced lens once is not an issue considering that everything we buy is overpriced.
3:25 I love do frame
me: i love Micro 34. i will call my future children Micro P***😂
My wife calls me this sometimes. 😭
I really needed this video, thanks!
Glad it was helpful!
Variable ND
Game over....
Everything you said is fair. But I believe the C80 is great for a solo shooter and being able to carry it in my backpack with 2 lenses and the rest of the accessories easily is important to me. So I guess it to each their own in regards to what you prioritize in the gear.
Hey, it's still a great camera and if you want to keep it stripped down it is an excellent choice.
Compactness is FX3 really excels, barring the internal ND.
But which one is bitter? And which one is beast?
Yes, I have an accent. I'm sorry.
Great review Sabretooth
You're welcome brother!
Great insight.
❤️
Love my c400!!
I’m jealous!!
@@thesavagefilmmakeramazingly put together video man!!
Overpriced canon garbage
@ 😂 you poor poor thing!
The C80 design is a blend in deal when in your participant observer mode, or adventurer traveler in that street market with hustlers wanting cash and consumables.
If you don't need to rig it up, absolutely. But that LCD monitor is not an ideal size.
@ Gotta love realism!
You are ignoring the fact, that you can adapt EF lenses to the C80 without downside. There is actually a bigger portfolio of lenses for the C80.
True but the Auto-focus is going to take a big hit using EF and you can also adapt those same lenses to the Sony as well.
@@thesavagefilmmaker the AF only takes a hit on really old EF lenses. And the biggest limitations are for stills really (e-shutter high fps burst).
And yes, you can adapt EF lenses to Sony E-mount, but that's the one scenario actually really suffers with EF-lenses.
You can adapt EF lenses to RF, MFT, L-mount and there is no real downside and no real degradation. You adapt them to E-mount and AF suffers. It's a Sony thing. (and yes .. i do adapt them to all those mounts.)
nah waiting for an FX6II next year is the way to go
It's strange to compare C80 and Fx6. C70 is closer to Fx6 and it's better, than Fx6. So C80 is on another level
C80 is the newer upgraded version of the C70 and a similar price to the Fx6. So of course I'm going to compare them. And this review covers wether or not the c80 is on another level.... but to do that you're need to... compare them. 🤔😂
Disagree, neither is definitely better or worse than FX6.
128,000 ISO is not a "base" iso on either camera. 12,800 is. Did you typo your VoiceOver and your graphics to 128,000, when you really tested at 12,800, or did you actually do the tests at 128,000?
Tested at 12,800. Just added an extra zero in text and script by accident 😵💫
Thesavagetimetraveler 😮
If you are smart you'd realize he made a mistake.
@@Lydersmithwhich he said it out loud and in the graphics, multiple times, so that’s many mistakes, which is why I asked
Awesome video! We are eager to answer any questions 😃
Fx6 doesn have a 8 bit codec. Both are 10bit 422 just once is far more compressed.
In my opinion, the Canon is better than the Sony in specs, features and pricing.
From footage I've seen online, Canon has a digital/Video look to its footage. A bit too sharp even.
Definitely sharper.
the Goonies Reference had me on the floor ! 😅😂 Still gong C80, Love this review its finally got me over the fence!
Hahah, C80 is a fantastic camera, if you can get over it's shape, or that works for you. It's excellent.
FX6 II will be fire
If it ever comes, Sony is being slow as molasses.
Thanks for the great review! A question for you, forgive me if you already said this. When you were comparing the high base isos of the C80 and the fx6/fx3, what codecs were you using? Any noise reduction?
I was using the highest quality 4K XFAVC codec ALL-I highest bitrate on on both. The noise reduction on both would have been set to their default settings, I did not manually adjust those. No further noise reduction in post.
Thanks!
Great review and I completely agree, the body shape of the C80 is disappointing. But as someone who has been shooting for 26 years now and started with shoulder mounted ENG cameras, I hate all of the box style cinema cameras that need to be rigged. With that said, after shooting with Sony for the past 9 years, I pulled the trigger on a C80. It was time for something different.
It is a great camera.
You’re gonna hate the lens system
@@Yupthereitism Nah, I'm good with Canon glass. Plus there's so much used EF options out there with an adapter.
@@DiffFamilyReviews good luck
13:35 this is why not everyone should have a microphone. If you don’t like the body of the C80 there’s another camera that is similar to the square A7S3 =FX6. It is called the C400. Oh but it is more expensive and it also has more features. Just say it I don’t have the money for a C400 and I am mad
Haha come on bro, you’re reaching a little bit. If I don’t like the body of the c80 - I should explain why(so I did) I’m not mad, just helping people decide if they want to buy it. You need to lay off the Canon tribalism brother. 🤣
@ nah! You RUclipsrs transmit your bias to the weak minded by saying things that do not make sense. C80 is superior to the FX6 in every way but a squared body you know what camera is almost the same as the C80 and has a square body the C400.
The problem with C70/C80 isn't the camera -- it's the expensive lenses. Th problem with the FX6 is the lack of a compressed codec in 4K-422-10bit.
Yeah that Codec thing.... Sony missed with that one.
You didn't mention anything about ND filter.
Yes I did.
@thesavagefilmmaker my bad. Sorry for that.
That sloth bit killed me 🤣
Totally agree regarding the form factor, I find it's faster to shoot on Sony but the image is so nice on Canon hmm
It's a tough call, are you bringing Sloth home for the holidays? 😂
As a dedicated Canon filmmaker and an owner from the C100 - C400 I think this is a rock solid review.
I think (especially for documentary shooters) Canon's color science and overall image quality is simply more pleasing than Sony. It just feels more film like and dynamic. It's why I have stayed with them for so long and why I am still on board. I think their RF line is amazing. The 24-70 and the 24-100 2.8 are solid zooms and the RF 50 / 85 1.2 lenses are easily the best lenses I have ever used. But the cost is inexcusable. 3k per lens is silly and selfish. Luckily I make a lot of money and can afford them but I do think it's an unnecessary barrier.
Sony really listened to users and from the FX 7 on they just made better overall cameras with less restrictions. I see why Canon lost so much of the market and it is frustrating to see so much less support and poorer innovations (AF etc).
The C400 has really caught up with Sony on a lot of aspects and the triple base ISO is pretty remarkable. But unless they release 3rd party RF lenses soon I think the release of this and the C80 is going to fall a bit flat.
Thanks for the thoughtful and funny review.
Thanks mate, appreciate your perspective. I owned the Canon 5d markiii Canon c300 Mark 1, C200 and C70. I'm a Canon fan, they've just let their competitors fill in all the gaps they were confident nobody would be able to, and eventually slipped behind them as a result. Canon Prices, Canon cripple hammer, Canon 1st party exclusivity it all adds up over time and you can't count on image quality and colour science alone to keep you in the drivers seat. I really liked the image out of this, and the C400 looks amazing, but not amazing enough for it to be worth switching back from my current Sony life and incurring the associated costs. I hope they open the doors for 3rd party lenses properly again, because then it would be something to look at much more seriously. The Sigma stuff is a good start.
I love a real review/comparison! Too many influencers doin glorified unboxing vids or thinly veiled ads.
Canon almost got me with the C80. It looks great on paper, but when I look closely it doesn't make sense (for my needs)
-DR is slightly lower than fx6
-Fx6 is plenty sharp, sharpness not something I'm chasing
-I loved working with R3D files when I had a Komodo but most of my work now would be burdened by raw file sizes. S-log does everything I need. If I really need raw I dunno that I'll be reaching for that tier camera anyways
-Form factor is mayyyybe better for gimbal than fx6? But worse otherwise?
there is no need to switch brands honestly. At this point all cameras shoot great footage. The cost to sell and buy new gear isn't worth it. Both have great autofocus, look, glass etc. Its people looking to buy their first cinema camera that has to decide which system works best for them.
Yep, C80 Raw lite is closer to R3D files and smaller file sizes, but still not as good as R3D. I think this would be quite tricky to balance on a gimbal because of its height and definitely worse to handle otherwise.
I almost fell off my chair in that first scene with the C80 @ 128,000 ISO… but then I watched further and realized your error… You see I’m about to publish a new video about the R1 and your video would have totally invalidated my findings… Fun fact: The C80 and C400 use a modified R3 sensor. Canon’s all new sensor is the one inside the R1… and oh boy, what a sensor that is!
Very interesting. Always thought the R3 looked great.
im a fx3 owner nd I prefer the fx6 colors.
Can't argue they look good!
I am a Sony lover, and I like the Canon's warm look too...but canon is not ready to work on issues. Hence movie to FUJI film
Fuji has some great Cams!
To shoot clean 3200 on fx6 you set to 12800 base and cine ei set your viewing yo 3200... then in post you just set it to 3200
What external monitor are you using for the c 80?
Small HD 702 touch.
@@thesavagefilmmaker Thank you !!!!
I dont kno why i still prefer c70
No denying it's a great camera, with a pleasing softness that the C80 doesn't have.
Subscribed. Because of the jump scare.
Yeah Buddy!
Sony has no plans on upgrading their cinema camera, so the FX6 will last you a few more year, the Sony A7S line will be updated 1st
Pricing wise, I can see why you didn't compare the FX6 to the C400. But I thought the C70 and C80 were meant to be kinda Gateway Cinema Cams for those DSLR or Mirrorless shooters looking for a similar body style with cinema camera specs??? Am I wrong??? So wouldn't the market for those two cameras while they may have some intersections be different anyway?
I say that because the main grip here seems to be the body design and the fact they don't go full out on the codex due to the limits put on by an SD card. But I thought it should still be limited. And if you want a full blown cinema camera and not a hybrid, the FX3 is just that. Or if you have have more of a budget and experience with cinema camera systems then the C400? Or am I wrong?
A gateway cinema cam, can still be a cinema cam shape, it just has to be affordable and easy to use. As far as specs, ports and price go c70/c80 is Canon's Fx6 equivalent, so it should be compared to the Fx6. If Sony did a better job at making a more functional gateway cine cam in the Fx6 than Canon have in the C70/C80, then Canon should learn something from that. They also have an R5C, which suits your argument much more than the c80 does. So yes, I would disagree with you, but you're not wrong, because these are all just opinions and we can have different ones.
Sinsa? 🤔
One of the best Sinsa’s you’ve ever seen!
@@thesavagefilmmaker Good one ☺😃
You're right. The c70 form factor is terrible.
Yup! Main reason I got rid of mine.
Yep, I wish they would have kept the c100kii body design. I have no clue why they went with a DSLR body style.
He form factor is actually very helpful getting camera in small situations. Operating it in a car for example
Sorry Savage ! No play between Fx6 ( 4 Years old camera ) and C80 ! Waiting the new FX6 mark II soon for this content no ?
....Only if they release it soon. 👀👀
Don't think it will come out anytime in the next 3-4 years. The fx 6 is still in heavy demand in productions.
@ but the competition is evolving and advancing in the game, 3, 4 years would be an incredible delay with BMPC, Nikon, RED ?
ummm the fx6 now does braw output.
Not for another year mate. But nice try. 🤣
Someone hasn’t heard of the 1Dc
I love the 1Dc, shot a short film on it back in 2016!! Also not a great camera for rigging. 😂😂
The 1DC puts out a nice image… though it’s only 8-bit and records in motion jpeg… which eats tons of space.
@@thesavagefilmmakeroh I agree it’s just you didn’t reference it. Also to be fair the c80 is build specifically for people who wish not to rig and love that form factor imo, like me. Also the c400 was released before the C80, not after.
The non existant cfxpress slot and the low bitrates, the lack of 6k60 are the reason i dont consider a c80, i dont even talk about a outdated fx6
So what camera do you use?
@ lumix gh7. I bought it for the great specs, especially open gate and the 4.3 format no full frame camera can give me.. cfexpress card. 5.7k 60 , built in fan, raw recording, there is not much more to ask for at this price. If i ever upgrade it has to be a camera that can do what mine can and more.
I mean you are really trashing a body style that is very popular lol. FX3, c70, BMPCC are all wildly popular selling cameras. I think the c70/c80 is just trying to give the shooters who like that body style an option with the cinema features. If you don't like it, cool, I get it. But to trash the whole body style when clearly there is a market for it is crazy.
There's a difference between popular and practical. And just because something has been adopted, doesn't mean people should blindly adopt it. If camera companies don't get feedback, they make the same mistakes. If users don't know about the drawbacks of a camera they might make the wrong purchase. I'm just doing my bit for filmmakers like me (I mean I bought a c70) who maybe haven't thought this aspect through.
Complaining about c80 body but people using a r5c with micro hdmi…. I like the c80 /blackmagic form factor . They are meant to use the internal screen, works perfeckt with the pockets big screen and is ok for the people a c80 targets. I dont want to rig my cameras at all. You complaining about the form factor is like complaining about a two seater cant transport 5 people..
Not really. I don't use the r5c either. Cinema cameras should have cinema camera bodies and the ability to rig them out for bigger cinema style jobs. c80 is not well designed for that.
@@thesavagefilmmaker i agree but how many video people really produce for cinema? I do lots of video but i do photos as well. A good hybrid is best option for many guys. I know guys who use nothing but a few sony fx3 s and they do it for a living. Fx3 not really has a cinema body. As a musician i know some music video guys as well and they are big blackmagic pocket guys. I think any form factor has a place in commercial video world.
I hate the Sony pro camera menu system and how the camera has to reboot when you switch base frame rates and stuff. Super stupid. Much prefer the sony mirrorless ergonomics. Maybe they'll figure out the Sony pro stuff someday.
Thank you!!!!!!!! no ever says this.... my people gave me hell because I let the c70 go Because it was not sex to look at or hold. I hate a high ass set up. It's stupid looking. I tell my students to build workable sexy rigs if they need a rig at all. if you look good, you play good, when you play good they pay good.!!! Deion Sanders!
Workable functional rig is 🔑🔑
Honestly, both the Sony and Canon top handles that come inside the box look retarded and useless AF - I'd never use one, and I am sure every videographer/filmmaker has another top handle that he uses as his preferred alternative.
Also, cages for C80 should come anytime soon and give way more mounting options for mics etc.
As for the form factor, I suspect Canon sticks with this shape for a second camera model now, aiming for the handheld run'n'gun social media creators (all that vertical stuff), so its basically holding a camera with a grip that is easy to just flip 90 degrees CCW (hence the screw hole on the side grip)
I am a Canon shooter, and for me, the C80 would be the logical choice because the C400 is above my level, and I cannot afford to switch systems because of the volume of batteries, lenses etc, that are all Canon related. And balancing the camera is, well, a matter of balance. For example, a 24-105 2.8 should be a good balance against the weight of the C80 body + a Vmount + some rods etc
Gotta admit that a bit more boxy design would've been more welcome, but hey, you work with what you have, and I find the C80 to be a pretty good tool for its price
A great tool for its price!
We all suffering from Canon Stockholm syndrome, one day we’ll rise, sell all Canon s#!t and buy Nikon Z6 iii
Nikon - the final frontier!
🤣🤣🤣
Listen I love Nikon, especially the Z8 which I think is vastly underrated, but the Z6 III has massive image quality problems in RAW. If they fix that, yes it would be the perfect camera.
👏
Buy iPhone 16 promax and save some money. You can't even tell the difference.
You can definitely tell the difference... 😂
South African Me ! 😂😂😂 ...you wanna be friends. ?
Sure thing brew!
Good call about the shape of C70/80. really, not many ppl addresses it. I think the reason why Canon created this weird shape is because they wanna keep their production plan as a hybrid camera production ( photography and video). Basically, Canon cannot beat Sony or Nikon on the photography side but still doesn't wanna give up. They even started creating the lenses for both sides. That is, no company has done that before. Even the C70/80 line is focused on Cinephotophy but still uses its iconic photography camera layout to build.
I do hate the c70 form factor. The fx6 was so much nicer to hold
💯💯
The C80 should be much better than a 4 old FX6 but it isn’t. Cuddos for Canon catching up and chiefs kiss to Sony for making a camera that is still the standard today.
from 14 minutes onward it is hilarious....I have a pair of FX30 units...very happy...might upgrade when the next FF FX3 or FX30 come out....all I am looking for is more dynamic range...maybe internal raw...that is about it...other than that I am happy with my FX30s...
The best camera is the best camera for your jobs and workflow, Don’t go high end when you don’t need to.👌
I agree I also have the FX3/FX30 and they are amazing
Can't go wrong with the FX lines because most clients ask for Sony than Canon.
FX6 SUCKS
Haha, if you say so.
C70 is just a poor ergonomic body to use. Image is nice but than than that a no go. FX6 on the other hand is just a joy to shoot with. In fact I much prefer the FX3 over the C70 and shape of the C80 tells me it's just as unpleasant to use as the C70.
Are you kidding me? First, it is ISO 12800 and not 128000. This value is not available on any camera, and well, you don’t have to be extra deep into camera technology to know that as values are mathematically predictable. But then: the form factor? For real? You are comparing the wrong cameras anyway. It is FX 6 against C400 and FX3 against C80. Yes, that tiny FX3 that shot a Hollywoodmovie, and nobody complained about its form factor, even though it is tiny and there is certainly no perfect balance on the rig. And yes, then things start to get really unfair, and there is no real comparison, as the C400 can run against the Burano and will not be too far off for a fraction of the Buranos price. But that’s how it is and we will see how Sony responds. But stop doing such bs comparisons for no reason.
Yup, ISO number had an extra zero, absolutely correct. But comparing an Fx3 to a C80? No way. Fx6 vs c80 is the closest in features, price and specs. This isn't a BS comparison, if I'd compared the c80 to an Fx3 - now THAT would be a BS comparison. But each to their own my friend.
This guy just blew in from stupid town
The Sony Fx6 blew the canon C80 away to another planet . Sony is just too good . Sony is the Apple of modern-day camera
🍎…..😂
The man is not good with numbers
What's an extra 0 between friends??😢