Prosecutor spats with judge, storms out of court room | Dan Abrams Live
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 авг 2022
- An assistant prosecutor was upset a judge continued a court case without the lead prosecutor present, after exchanging words with the judge, he stormed out of the courtroom. Law & Crime Network host Jesse Weber joins "Dan Abrams Live" to discuss the bizarre incident.
#court #prosecutor
Dan Abrams Live brings a fresh, no-holds-barred approach to covering and analyzing the news.
NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all America.
Find us online: www.newsnationnow.com/
Get our app: bit.ly/3AbFrG3
Watch us on TV or via streaming: bit.ly/3oxRmf5
![Finesse2Tymes - Pretty Ricky [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xIoP_mhYRT0/mqdefault.jpg)
People get tired of these crooked judges. They ought to investigate the judge.
AGREE
What's with those "experts"?
The judge specifically told the prosecutor not to cancel an appointment and that it would not be a problem to wait for her - and then he didn't wait for her and acted like it was her fault that she wasn't on time. That's manipulative as f*ck and should not be tollerated in the judicial system.
these experts are choking on gavels back stage
It makes me wonder what other shady stuff he's done, that's probably why he didn't hold him in contempt of court. Because he knew the prosecutor was right, so the judge was smart to not fight fire with fire 🔥. But he should be a real judge and follow the rules and laws and not play any games with anybody or anything at anytime and keep his job 100% true so is anybody ever wanted to look through his past life they couldn't pull up anything on him because he kept himself clean and he did everything by the books and was legal the whole time. Which I have doubts this judge wasn't like that. I see shady all over his face.
it's not just 'manipulative as fuck' but is actually corruption. he should be disbarred and jailed, but literally nothing happened to him after this.
The Judge had hid own inappropriate moment just the day before with his off handed Comment about putting the female defense attorney on leash. He later apologized though
There’s “reporters” are incredibly skewed. It’s the judge that was being disrespectful, and has a history of outbursts but no… it was the prosecutor who was disrespectful for standing up for their co-counsel?
EXACTLY
Dude yeah the News article I read has the same agenda!
Judges need to be held accountable
I watched this go down live. Crazy!
“Prosecutor spats with Judge, storms out of the courtroom”
Prosecutor calmly walks out of the courtroom. 🚩More clickbait
In my opinion, this judge should be dismissed. Many years ago, I witnessed arrogance in a judge....so very sad.
This is on the judge. If you tell a lead prosecutor that tells you in advance of a scheduling conflict weeks prior that she should not cancel in preexisting obligations and that it would be fine, only to push forward without her present, then you as a judge have become a problem. The man should have his lead prosecutor present. The judge had no remourse too everytime he cut the man off knowing full well he was going to explain a situation in which the judge was the unreasonable one. Judges are not infalliable. And this is coming from someone who has little respect for prosecutors.
Terrible judge.
This interviewee Jessie Webber looks and sounds to me like a complete sleezebag. The prosecutor was being disrespectful? No, he was showing standards, integrity, and professionalism and that judge was way out of line.
Brian Entin looking fresh af in studio!
But there are a lot of BAD judges these days. You could hear the lawyer try to tell the judge he was notified about her absence.
WHY DOESN'T THE JUDGE HAVE TO RESPECT THE PROSECUTORS REQUEST?????
Looks like an attempt to seed distrust in the Judicial branch.
Why would this Judge go back on his word ?! Are they Gods ? No they aren’t look at how many judges give children to criminal parents ,or are corrupt themselves .
Well the judge did say basically leave if you want and which he did.
I agree. America, am I right?
Imagine if the suspect could walk out of court because he doesn't like the ruling
He geting off now
Ok then this is a mistrial if I’m not mistaken. No true justice for the murdered woman in this particular case. Sad
prosecutor doesn't need to be present for the jury verdict. The trial was already over when she tried to play this game and her assistant did this grandstanding.
This was OH v Moore. Matheau Moore was accused of killing his wife and staging it to look like a suicide. The prosecutor here was upset his boss wouldn't be there even though it was procedural and the judge already aludded to the fact he would be denying the defense's request for an acquittal. After he left, the judge denied the defense's request and 10 minutes later both prosecutors showed up and nothing really happened. The jury ended up finding Moore not guilty and acquitted him on all charges. The prosecutor was really rude to the judge and showed an emotional outburst here. It most likely hurt the prosecution's case with the jury and the public.
The jury wasnt there though. How did it affect the jury?
Wolaver nooooo ugh I used to respect this guy
Your comments that it’s a weak case shouldn’t have been made out loud. That’s a terrible comment.
This man is a legal expert? I have seen lawyers much more passionate in court than this attorney. The judge was wrong in this situation by being under handed and giving terrible advice to the prosecutor
I think frustration just kind of creeped in on them. The female prosecutor had complained a day or two prior to that she felt the judge was trying to suppress their case, course she didnt take it quite as far as the male prosecutor did. The judge seemed to have taken it with a grain of salt. He even commented a time or two how he knew it was a frustrating case.
You are mixing up the defense attorney from the prosecution. The prosecution was not there at all the defense attorney and judge that’s who this was this news station is full of idiots they’re saying the defense attorney was the prosecution and that’s not the case the prosecution was not even there and that was an issue the prosecution had a schedule issue and the judge pretty much tried to set it up that way tbh. Appeal this case this was not done right at all.
The guy that walked out was Assistant Prosecutor. His lead wasn't there and his lead was also informed by the judge he was denying defense's motion on acquittal. He never forced the lead to carry on with her appointment but it was unlikely the lead needed to be there to argue anything and the assistant was going to be there. Had the judge granted the acquittal, prosecution could not appeal. If he continues the trial, he gives prosecution and opportunity to redeem their poor performance on closing and letting the jury decide.
Spars, not spats. English please…
Spat means a petty quarrel in some contexts, which this is. English please...
The lawyer went for some burgers 🍔 fries 🍟 and a 🥛 ice cream 🍨 shake…
these two talking heads are just clowns, the judge needs a taking too
I disagree. Judges these days take way too much latitude in proceedings. The Alex Jones case is a prime example, like or dislike Alex Jones. That was a farce.
no it wasn't. Jones was already found guilty due to refusing to comply with discovery. It was during the damages portion of the trial that he was forbidden to discuss his "innocence", since he was already found to be guilty!
The defense won this case.
The guy was found not guilty of murder.
Hahaha government throwing a fit 🤣🤣🤣
What? Are you stupid?
His wife was a beast, and needed to go!
Case dismissed!!!
What a disservice to the victim & defendant. The case is about them/crime not the behavior of lawyers & judges.
Yes but these judges can be really bad themselves so to lay all the blame on the prosecutor I don't think it's fair
@@the3js842 Hi … that’s why I said ‘& Judges’ totally agree.
Now that's contempt of court.
No it's not.
The judge was ruling on a motion and already had his opinion there were no arguments waiting. It's like the prosecutor needed his boss to hold his hand while he cross the street. I can't believe the judge did not hold him in contempt.
What prevented the judge without sending the prosecuter to jail for contemporary of court?
Because the judge knew that if he did that it would come out that he lied about the prosecutor.
I'm not a lawyer but I know a little bit. Besides being able to hold him in contempt, pretty sure he could of rules a mistrial or some other version of ending the proceedings right that second because he was reading to move on and there was no one representing the county.
And then the judge would have been investigated and he clearly wanted to avoid that.
Wokism in the Court Room?
They must be Democraps - Prosecutor not showing up
Contempt of court realness! No wonder they lost the case. Next time, channel this energy into actually building your case, man!
Dude shut up and research the case.
This video lacks a lot of context.
1. The guy objecting is a lawyer on the prosecutors team, there is no reason he can't represent the state in this matter.
2. The defendant is owed a speedy trial, if the prosecutor can just skip out, how is that possible?
3. When the judge was informed of the "scheduling conflict" he told them to do exactly this, have someone else from the prosecutors office stand in.
4. There is no appeal for the prosecutor, so if this goes south because they opted not to be there to make their case, that's on them.
Knowing what's actually going on here, I think the judge acted in a way we would want a judge to act if our own lives were on hold pending a trial.
This is also why a 60 second snippet is a bad way to form a full opinion.
I have a problem with number 3 and I think number 3 is what the lawyer’s problem was as well. This was a hearing on a motion that could have lost the prosecution’s entire case with no opportunity to appeal. That means that, even though the judge seemed ready to rule on the papers alone, the lead prosecutor could have been required to make an argument or answer outstanding questions to help in the ruling. That would require the person with extensive knowledge of the case, not merely someone from their office to sub in for the day. It’s not that easy when it takes years to investigate, build, and try a case and that’s where the knowledge comes from.
You have scheduling conferences for a reason. You state your conflicts. And if the judge notes your conflicts and conveys their understanding that you are unavailable during that time, they cannot simply then schedule a hearing at that time. Yes defendant has a right to speedy trial. Scheduling this hearing a few hours later or the day before or day after would not abrogate that right.
And while talking about speedy trial, on your point number 2, the prosecutor is not simply skipping something. They state their availability during the scheduling conference, which is what they were supposed to do, and got an affirmative response.
My more important question to you, though, is this. What if the judge had done this to the defendant’s counsel?
I appreciate the prosecutor standing up for this, even in a procedural matter, because it’s not okay when done on their side and not okay when done to the defense either. And it would be more harmful if done to the defense. For that reason, it was kind of refreshing to see.
With everything going on with YSL, this news clip did not age well.