SPECIAL VIDEO - NL200 Extended GamePlay [2 hours]

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 64

  • @zzxyyxxz4976
    @zzxyyxxz4976 Год назад +12

    really liking the long versions of the play and explains. thanks!

  • @joannes3392
    @joannes3392 Год назад +3

    Toujours un plaisir d’avoir un coaching de 2h gratuit. Ça fais travailler notre anglais mais on prend ahah! Super vidéo comme d’habitude. 🤝🤝💪💪

  • @rafa17453
    @rafa17453 Год назад

    Absolutly love this video. Play in this pool myself everyday and can take so much away from this video. Please consider making another one of this format it is amazing for learning. Thank you so much!!

  • @leonid1238
    @leonid1238 Год назад +4

    thank you Yolan!!! Its a realy good format)) i watch every hand on a mikrosсope. Im from Ukraine, i wait another roket attack from rasia, but i watch all your video

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Год назад +5

      This is the most funny but actually not funny comment i ever seen

  • @beniolinhox5679
    @beniolinhox5679 Год назад +5

    more this type of stuff ❤❤❤

  • @brenneisenchevy981
    @brenneisenchevy981 Год назад +3

    great content :) lately i´ve been thinking about timing tells a lot what are your toughts on snap bet´s ? For myself i noticed if its a spot where you have to find unnatural bluffs its even harder to find them instant so more value heavy. On Cards where the nuts changed i felt its more likely to be a bluff cause youre value range mostly has to think a few seconds if its still able to value bet or consider a good sizing.

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Год назад +2

      It's nearly impossible to generalise patterns when we do timing analysis. It will depends on the player too much.
      However we can see patterns that are oriented more in a way than the other.
      You're correct that often, (not always) player need to think with their value (which size do they take etc..) while bluffing is more intuitive.
      Also human has the tendency of using deception more than non-deception (deception = I make you bêle e I have the opposite of what I have) . So Snap looks stronger.
      Again we can't generalise , some players know this and snap value or polar bluffs.

  • @papapoker
    @papapoker Год назад +2

    this is that particular time when longer is better :D

  • @ramirohergenreder9713
    @ramirohergenreder9713 Год назад

    My unconscious memory appreciates your content

  • @matfab2613
    @matfab2613 Год назад +1

    this is golden nugget!!

  • @luckymaggie6594
    @luckymaggie6594 Год назад +1

    ❤️

  • @dennisje2925
    @dennisje2925 Год назад

    Thanks for the long video. Some people are saying no persons are beating the rake in 200NL. Do you know if that is correct, and if it is the same at for example 10nl, 25nl, 50nl and 100nl?

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Год назад +2

      I think its really hard to win without rb in 100nl/200 specially zoom. But its doable.
      Im be on 20k hands all played in videos for the en channel and fr channel on nl200. 10nl-50nl are beatable without rb

    • @dennisje2925
      @dennisje2925 Год назад

      @@YolanCohenPoker Thanks. For the last 6 months my bankroll was quite stable. Trying to make the transition from 10nl to 25nl. But seems i am having a bad run every time I trie it. But maybe I am not good enough. I will keep on studing and see how far I am coming. Started with 50nl on GG 1.5 years ago. Current at 2700.

    • @dennisje2925
      @dennisje2925 Год назад

      And my rake back is very low. I thing that is because GG is paying taxes to the Dutch covernment. When dutch players could play at partypoker (two years ago) i got 1 buyin rake back per week. And at GG its only 1/3 buyin. And both sites claims it is 20% :)

  • @mikekuznetsov4993
    @mikekuznetsov4993 Год назад

    Hey! Nice vid, what did you mean about sizing bigger when there are no draws instead of two FD's? Happened at around 1:51:00

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Год назад

      In theory you should use bigger sizing on turn having 2 flush draw, due to less range EQ decrease for the IP players.
      It depends on the texture tho.

  • @yenomrtgllwi
    @yenomrtgllwi Год назад

    Great content!

  • @ramirohergenreder9713
    @ramirohergenreder9713 Год назад

    The rival's check in the river 1:22:07 seemed very creative to me, any agro would push, but he made the wrong player, excellent check-behind

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Год назад +2

      The range reading here is extremely difficult .
      He arrives river with super high frec of QQ-KK , high frec of JJ-TT And frec of AA (some players will x often flop or turn)
      He arrives river with bluff too. But because most players slightly under3b from the bb (and in this pool I would say the difference is big) , the bluff weight are difficult to find.
      So he has his KK QQ all the time and some bluff. When he check, some players always have bluffs. But firstthey need to have AK AQ (that can x flop or x turn, so river ponderation is not 1) , and second they need to call.
      Even vs a small bet he can fold, and the cost of being bluff raise here is disastrous. Better to x imo but given the small ponderation of KK QQ when he x the river , it's close, probably a bet vs most guys

    • @ramirohergenreder9713
      @ramirohergenreder9713 Год назад

      @@YolanCohenPoker If the range is strong, I still think a 1/4 or 1/3 bet might work better if the other player is bluffing, to get more value out of 99, TT, JJ and leave an infrequent push to AQ, AK. The check can be creative but it works against a very aggro player probably nothing else.

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Год назад +1

      @@ramirohergenreder9713 i agree yeah, wasnt clear on my mess above, in this specific context i think betting 1/3 is better.

  • @positivelife9720
    @positivelife9720 Год назад +3

    long versions are way betther ... i wish u can make even 5 7 hour sessions very nice play tho learning a lot from you

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Год назад +3

      Ahaha , why not doing a 10hours video as a challenge .

    • @papapoker
      @papapoker Год назад +1

      @@YolanCohenPoker we request 10 hour challenge!!!!!!!!!!! :DDD

  • @ArunasSapitavicius-of7kj
    @ArunasSapitavicius-of7kj Год назад

    Great video as always, like how you think about the game . However in some spots when u thought a guy hardly even call top pair if u bet 2big and u got snapped by 3rd pairs ir similiar stuff, I think you overestimate how fellow asian players will fold in most spots :)

  • @旋轉屁屁
    @旋轉屁屁 Год назад

    I like this video!!!!

  • @kevinlacoste9984
    @kevinlacoste9984 Год назад

    Plus de contenu comme ça c’est de l’eau benite

  • @italiandutyy4962
    @italiandutyy4962 Год назад

    how many bb/100 you can have in nl 200 pool here? nice video !

    • @BlazedBeat
      @BlazedBeat Год назад +1

      gg is very marginal wr. top 10 regs are probably having a wr of 1-2bb/100 due the high rake. there is some additonal rakeback tho to consider.

  • @Mvdd1
    @Mvdd1 Год назад +1

    i totally didnt understand what u have said at 1:51 about sizings. Can you write that in comment?

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  11 месяцев назад +1

      I dont think he has better than 99 and most of this str8 and better hand would reraise me on the turn, so I can cap his range even more

    • @Mvdd1
      @Mvdd1 10 месяцев назад

      thank you@@YolanCohenPoker

  • @SUB-tf9om
    @SUB-tf9om Год назад

    GG200NL is full of nits 😂😂

  • @zanama7177
    @zanama7177 Год назад +1

  • @IIIiiIIiIiIi-h6h
    @IIIiiIIiIiIi-h6h Год назад

    Have you ever thought that this disclosure might reduce your winrate?

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Год назад +1

      It might but it helps people getting better and going pro/win more money, so im fine with that

  • @임준우-q7w
    @임준우-q7w Месяц назад

    1:15:21 so sick;;

  • @Mauricio-kf8qx
    @Mauricio-kf8qx 10 месяцев назад

    1:17:52 how tf do u find that min raise bluff😮

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  10 месяцев назад

      Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t!

  • @johnrossi7916
    @johnrossi7916 Год назад

    Do you coach or have a cfp?

  • @DhmConstructionLtd
    @DhmConstructionLtd 5 месяцев назад

    why you tank every street in every freaking hand ? ! is this because of the algorithm God favoring

  • @_MMWWMM_
    @_MMWWMM_ Год назад

    1:11:10 did you see the SB cold call? ATs hand

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Год назад +1

      Yeah that’s a fold , 4x + call is to big , cant call there vs these sizes.
      Glad you arrived at this time :p

    • @_MMWWMM_
      @_MMWWMM_ Год назад

      ​@@YolanCohenPokeryeah I complete this spot a lot with pp's, suited QT/JT to play with the cold call fish. So 3x it's a call?

    • @_MMWWMM_
      @_MMWWMM_ Год назад

      What would you 4bet here?

  • @임준우-q7w
    @임준우-q7w Месяц назад

    1:17:51 wtf;;😂

  • @williamwilliams8997
    @williamwilliams8997 Год назад

    Why are you wearing a mask in the thumbnail? Are you trolling or do you actually think a mask protects you from a virus?
    Great video though! Thanks for uploading such great poker content.